Primary reversed gastric tube reconstruction in long gap esophageal atresia

Isoperistaltic gastric tube for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) in newborn, infants, and toddlers: a case-control study from a tertiary center

Background

Limited evidence exists about outcomes after gastric tube formation as "rescue" technique to avoid esophageal replacement in long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). The last ERNICA Consensus Conference on the Management of LGEA has placed the techniques of gastric tubulization among the priorities for future research.

Aims

Evaluate personal experience with Isoperistaltic Gastric Tube (IGT) and compare its outcomes with other more popular techniques for LGEA.

Methods

A case-control study has been conducted. A retrospective monocentric analysis of LGEA patients (period: 2010-19) has been conducted in all consecutive IGT patients and each of these has been type matched with two cases of LGEA treated with other techniques. The follow-up (FU) considered was 24-months.

Results

IGT and controls showed no statistically significant differences regarding preoperative variables like sex, gestational age, birth weight, syndromes, and EA type. However, IGT patients had a significantly longer esophageal GAP under boost pressure (4.5 vertebral bodies vs. 3.6, p = 0.019) at time of surgery. The analysis showed no statistical difference among the two groups about perioperative outcomes, ICU, or overall postoperative stay. No differences have been shown between IGT and controls during the follow-up regarding GERD, esophagitis, fundoplication, dysphagia, vocal cord paralysis, stenosis, and dilatations, auxologic data, need for anastomosis revision, oral aversion, and death.

Conclusions

Isoperistaltic Gastric Tube is safe and effective even in LGEA patients with longer gaps, with good perioperative, post-operative and middle-term outcomes. This procedure may be considered as an alternative to avoid esophageal substitution when a primary anastomosis seems impossible for a residual gap after traction and growth techniques.

Surgical treatment and major complications Within the first year of life in newborns with long-gap esophageal atresia gross type A and B - a systematic review

BACKGROUND

The surgical repair of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still a challenge and there is no consensus on the preferred method of reconstruction. We performed a systematic review of the surgical treatment of LGEA Gross type A and B with the primary aim to compare the postoperative complications related to the different methods within the first postoperative year.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on the surgical repair of LGEA Gross type A and B within the first year of life published from January 01, 1996 to November 01, 2016.

RESULTS

We included 57 articles involving a total of 326 patients of whom 289 had a Gross type A LGEA. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was the most applied surgical method (68.4%) in both types, followed by gastric pull-up (GPU) (8.3%). Anastomotic stricture (53.7%), gastro-esophageal reflux (GER) (32.2%) and anastomotic leakage (22.7%) were the most common postoperative complications, with stricture and GER occurring more often after DPA (61.9% and 40.8% respectively) compared to other methods (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients in this review were managed by DPA and postoperative complications were common despite the surgical method, with anastomotic stricture and GER being most common after DPA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic review of case series and case reports with no comparison group (level IV).

Management of long gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review and evidence-based guidelines from the APSA Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee

BACKGROUND

Treatment of the neonate with long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is one of the most challenging scenarios facing pediatric surgeons today. Contributing to this challenge is the variability in case definition, multiple approaches to management, and heterogeneity of the reported outcomes. This necessitates a clear summary of existing evidence and delineation of treatment controversies.

METHODS

The American Pediatric Surgical Association Outcomes and Evidence Based Practice Committee drafted four consensus-based questions regarding LGEA. These questions concerned the definition and determination of LGEA, the optimal method of surgical management, expected long-term outcomes, and novel therapeutic techniques. A comprehensive search strategy was crafted and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were utilized to identify, review and report salient articles.

RESULTS

More than 3000 publications were reviewed, with 178 influencing final recommendations. In total, 18 recommendations are provided, primarily based on level 4-5 evidence. These recommendations provide detailed descriptions of the definition of LGEA, treatment techniques, outcomes and future directions of research.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence supporting best practices for LGEA is currently low quality. This review provides best recommendations based on a critical evaluation of the available literature. Based on the lack of strong evidence, prospective and comparative research is clearly needed.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study, prognosis study and study of diagnostic test.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-V.

Surgical repair of long-gap esophageal atresia: A retrospective study comparing the management of long-gap esophageal atresia in the Nordic countries

BACKGROUND

Several surgical procedures have been described in the reconstruction of long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA). We reviewed the surgical methods used in children with LGEA in the Nordic countries over a 15-year period and the postoperative complications within the first postoperative year.

METHODS

Retrospective multicenter medical record review of all children born with Gross type A or B esophageal atresia between 01/01/2000 and 12/31/2014 reconstructed within their first year of life.

RESULTS

We included 71 children; 56 had Gross type A and 15 type B LGEA. Delayed primary anastomosis (DPA) was performed in 52.1% and an esophageal replacement procedure in 47.9%. Gastric pull-up (GPU) was the most frequent procedure (25.4%). The frequency of chromosomal abnormalities, congenital heart defects and other anomalies was significantly higher in patients who had a replacement procedure. The frequency of gastroesophageal reflux (GER) was significantly higher after DPA compared to esophageal replacement (p = 0.013). At 1-year follow-up the mean body weight was higher after DPA than after organ interposition (p = 0.043).

CONCLUSION

DPA and esophageal replacement procedures were equally applied. Postoperative complications and follow-up were similar except for the development of GER and the body weight at 1-year follow-up. Long-term results should be investigated.

TYPE OF STUDY

Treatment study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Surgical outcomes of different approaches to esophageal replacement in long-gap esophageal atresia: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Esophageal replacement (ER) surgery has been widely used in long-gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) over the past few decades. The most commonly used surgical approaches in many pediatric surgical centers include colon interposition (CI), gastric pull-up (GPU), jejunal interposition (JI), and gastric tube reconstruction (GTR). However, there is no systematic evidence on which is the optimal conduit for the native esophagus. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes among these 4 replacement approaches in LGEA cases based on current evidence.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched for relevant literature on November 18 2016. Studies on ER in LGEA were reviewed and selected according to eligibility criteria. We focused on surgical outcomes regarding to different replacement approaches, including postoperative complications and long-term follow-up. Both detailed descriptions of single studies and pooled data analysis were conducted. Data were computed by Reviewer Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included (4 comparative retrospective, 3 prospective, and 16 retrospective) with a total of 593 patients (393 LGEA, 66.3%). The number of patients with available data for analysis was 534 (90.1%), including 127 patients (98 LGEA) of GPU, 335 (223 LGEA) of CI, 45 (all LGEA) of JI, and 27 (all LGEA) of GTR. Follow-up information was provided in 15 studies. Anastomotic leak and stricture, respiratory problems, and gastroesophageal reflux were analyzed as major postoperative complications. Long-term follow-ups were concentrated on growth and feeding conditions.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence on short- and long-term outcomes of ER in LGEA patients was limited, and proper prospective comparative studies were lacking. This present systematic review indicates CI and GPU as comparable and favorable approaches, especially CI in the long-term outcomes. Studies on JI and GTR were limited, which need larger sample size to assess their validity and outcomes.

Gastric tube esophagoplasty for pediatric esophageal replacement

BACKGROUND

Esophageal replacement in children is indicated in cases of esophageal atresia with or without fistula, in case of long gap esophageal atresia or failed primary repair. Intractable post corrosive esophageal stricture is considered also a major indication for replacement.

METHODS

This is a cohort retrospective study of esophageal replacement cases by gastric tube carried out at the pediatric surgery department at Cairo University between 2011 and 2015. We reported 50 patients (30 boys and 20 girls); the ages ranged from 7months to 9years. Esophageal atresia cases were 27 while caustic esophageal stricture cases were 23. Isoperistaltic gastric tube technique was done in 45 patients while antiperistaltic (reversed) gastric tube technique was done in 5 cases. Retrosternal route was chosen in 38 patients while transhiatal route was chosen in 12 patients.

RESULTS

Leakage and stricture were the most common complications. We had 5 cases of mortality, which were caused mainly by chest related complications. We had excellent to good results during long term follow up in terms of weight gain, swallowing pattern, quality of life, and overall satisfaction CONCLUSION: Gastric tube is a satisfactory surgical method for esophageal replacement in children.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Long-gap esophageal atresia

The management of long-gap esophageal atresia remains challenging with limited consensus on the definition, evaluation, and surgical approach to treatment. Efforts to preserve the native esophagus have been successful with delayed primary anastomosis and tension-based esophageal growth induction processes. Esophageal replacement is necessary in a minority of cases, with the conduit of choice and patient outcomes largely dependent on institutional expertise. Given the complexity of this patient population with significant morbidity, treatment and long-term follow-up are best done in multidisciplinary esophageal and airway treatment centers.

Postsurgical Perforation of the Esophagus Can Be Treated Using a Fully Covered Stent in Children

OBJECTIVES

Surgery and conservative treatment of esophageal or gastric perforations are both often associated with poor results and carry a high morbidity and mortality rate. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of using fully covered self-expending metallic stents (SEMS) in children with upper digestive leaks.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed all children with esophageal or gastric perforation who were treated with placement of an SEMS from January 2011 to January 2015. Closure of the perforation was the primary outcome measured. Secondary outcomes were the duration of antibiotic therapy and parenteral nutrition, adverse events, and length of hospitalization.

RESULTS

A total of 19 SEMS were placed in 10 patients (median age: 5.5 years; 5 girls) treated for postanastomotic leaks of esophageal atresia (n = 3), esophagogastroplasty (n = 4), resection of esophageal duplication (n = 1) or perforation during Toupet surgical dismantling (n = 1), and gastric rupture after Nissen surgery (n = 1). The perforation closed in 9 out of 10 patients in a mean of 36 days after stenting (range: 13-158 days). All patients received antibiotic therapy for an average of 17.5 days (3-109 days) and parenteral nutrition for 49 days (17-266 days). During a median follow-up of 8.9 months, 4 out of 9 sealed perforations developed stenosis, which was efficiently treated by endoscopic dilations in 2 patients and surgical redo in 2 patients with dilation-resistant stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Covered stents appear to be beneficial in closing esophageal perforations in children and can avoid the high morbidity of a surgical repair. Stenosis, however, occurred frequently after larger leakages.

Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND

We investigated whether removable stents, such as self-expandable plastic stents (SEPSs) and fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) could provide an alternative treatment for recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations after esophageal atresia (EA) repair.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of our study was to evaluate technical feasibility. Secondary aims were to evaluate safety and procedural success.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Tertiary-care referral center.

PATIENTS

A total of 24 children with EA.

INTERVENTIONS

Retrospective review of all children with EA who underwent dilation and esophageal stent placement from January 2010 to February 2013 at our institution.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Healing of perforation and stricture resolution at 30 and 90 days.

RESULTS

A total of 41 stents (SEPSs 14, FCSEMSs 27) were placed in 24 patients with EA during the study period, including 14 who had developed esophageal leaks. Procedural success of esophageal stent placement in the treatment of refractory strictures was 39% at 30 days and 26% at 90 days. The success rate was 80% for closure of esophageal perforations with stent therapy after dilation and 25% for perforations associated with surgical repair. Adverse events of stent placement included migration (21% of SEPSs and 7% of FCSEMSs), granulation tissue (37% of FCSEMSs), and deep ulcerations (22% of FCSEMSs).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective study with small sample size.

CONCLUSION

SEPSs and FCSEMSs can be placed successfully in small infants and children with a history of EA repair. The stents appear to be safe and beneficial in closing esophageal perforations, especially post-dilation. However, a high stricture recurrence rate after stent removal may limit their usefulness in treating recalcitrant esophageal anastomotic strictures.

Modified Collis-Nissen procedure for long gap pure esophageal atresia

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Esophageal reconstruction in long gap esophageal atresia (EA) is technically challenging, and several procedures have been described. The purpose of this study is to review our experience with the modified Collis-Nissen procedure in the repair of long gap pure EA.

METHODS

Six patients with pure EA were treated at our institution from 1985 to 2008. Patients' demographics, surgical technique, timing of repair, early and late complications, and long-term functional outcomes were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Five primary cases and 1 redo case were included. The mean gap length was 5.3 vertebral bodies (range, 4-6). Modified Collis-Nissen procedure was performed at a mean age of 11.6 months (range, 9-14 months) in primary cases. There was 1 anastomotic leak in the redo case, which healed spontaneously. Two patients had anastomotic strictures requiring balloon dilatations. Patients were weaned from tube feeding at a mean duration of 4 months (range, 1-6 months) postoperatively. All patients have normal oral intake at the last follow-up visit. Two adult patients had normal growth and development and no digestive symptoms. Endoscopic examination and pH monitoring showed no signs of significant gastroesophageal reflux.

CONCLUSIONS

Modified Collis-Nissen procedure is a good option to consider in patients with long gap pure EA and is associated with an acceptable complication rate and promising short- and long-term results.

Type A esophageal atresia: a critical review of management strategies at a single center

PURPOSE

The purpose of was to study the short- and long-term outcomes in the management of isolated esophageal atresia with different operative strategies.

METHODS

All patients undergoing type A atresia repair over a 15-year period were included. Demographic data, birth weight, gestational age, incidence of associated anomalies, management, and long-term outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with type A atresia (9 male) were treated in the study period. The mean gestational age was 35.5 weeks (range, 27-39 weeks), and the mean birth weight was 2179 g (range, 670-3520 g). Eight babies had associated anomalies. Thirteen patients underwent gastrostomy as the initial procedure, and 2 underwent the Foker procedure. In the delayed management group, 9 patients underwent primary anastomosis, with 2 patients needing proximal pouch myotomy. Two patients underwent a Collis gastroplasty. Two patients underwent a cervical esophagostomy and a gastric tube replacement at 4 months and 1 year, respectively. Eight patients (60%) in this group had anastomotic leaks. All patients are currently on prokinetics and proton pump inhibitors. Seven required antireflux surgery. The median length of hospital admission was 4 months (range, 3-19 months). The native esophagus was preserved in 13 (85%) of 15 babies. All patients are alive, and 14 of 15 are capable of feeding orally.

CONCLUSIONS

Type A esophageal atresia continues to be associated with significant morbidity despite advances in surgical technique and intensive care.

Natural history of spinal anomalies and scoliosis associated with esophageal atresia

OBJECTIVE

Clinical characteristics of spinal deformities that commonly occur in patients with esophageal atresia (EA) are unclear. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence and natural history of spinal anomalies and scoliosis in patients with EA.

METHODS

A population-based cohort of 100 adults who had an operation for EA in our hospital were examined clinically and radiographically for spinal deformities. The results were compared with data obtained from normal population-based controls.

RESULTS

Vertebral anomalies were observed in 45 patients, predominating in the cervical spine in 38 patients. Any additional anomaly was the most significant risk factor (odds ratio [OR]: 27 [95% confidence interval (CI): 8-100]) for the occurrence of vertebral anomalies. Scoliosis of >10 degrees was observed in 56 patients, >20 degrees in 11 patients, and >45 degrees in 1 patient. The risk for scoliosis of >10 degrees was 13-fold (OR: 13 [95% CI: 8.3-21]), and the risk for scoliosis of >20 degrees was 38-fold (OR: 38 [95% CI: 14-106]) compared with those in the normal population. Thoracotomy-induced rib fusions (OR: 3.6 [95% CI: 0.7-19]) and other associated anomalies (OR: 2.1 [95% CI: 0.9-2.9]) were the strongest predictive factors for scoliosis. The general clinical course of spinal deformities was mild, and none of the patients had undergone spinal surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of scoliosis is 13-fold after repair of EA in relation to general population. Nearly half of the patients have vertebral anomalies predominating in the cervical spine. Most of these deformities were not diagnosed primarily or during growth. Spinal surgery is rarely indicated.

Gastric tube-pericardial fistula: a remote complication of esophageal replacement for long gap esophageal atresia

Several short and long-term complications of esophageal replacement have been described in the literature. We report the case of a gastric tube-pericardial fistula occurring 20 years after initial repair of long gap esophageal atresia with a reversed gastric tube.

Long-gap esophageal atresia treated by growth induction: the biological potential and early follow-up results

This study had two purposes. The first was to determine whether the growth procedure would allow true primary repairs of the most severe end of the esophageal atresia (EA) spectrum with the longest gaps (LG) and most rudimentary lower esophageal segments. The second goal was to provide the first short- to mid-term (3-12 years) follow-up data on the esophageal function and quality of life (QOL) data on the patients in this series. From our series of 60 LG-EA patients who underwent a growth procedure, 42 had the true primary esophageal repair completed 3 years ago. Among these, 18 had gaps over 6 cm, and for 6, only a rudimentary lower esophagus existed well below the diaphragm. No patient was turned down and all had primary repairs. These results suggest that even the most rudimentary segment has the potential to achieve normal size and that the full EA spectrum can have a primary repair. Our follow-up studies indicated that the esophageal function of these previously grown segments was very good. All contacted (40) were eating normally with only 3 receiving supplemental g-tube feeds because of other significant defects. We have actively treated significant reflux and 41/42 had fundoplication. By endoscopy (N = 15) no esophagitis was visible, but on biopsy, mild inflammation was found in 3. No conditions were found which would suggest that there would be a late deterioration or adverse consequences would arise. Based on these ongoing evaluations, the outlook seems very favorable for a good long-term QOL.

Total gastric transposition is better than partial gastric tube esophagoplasty for esophageal replacement in children

Whenever the surgeon uses the stomach as an esophageal substitute, either one of two techniques is generally performed: total gastric transposition or gastric tube esophagoplasty. No existing reports compare the complications associated with these two surgical procedures. The purpose of this study is to review the authors' experience with total gastric transposition and verify whether this technique is superior to gastric tube esophagoplasty in children by comparing the main complications with those reported in the publications of gastric tubes esophagoplasties in the English language literature published in the last 38 years. A total of 35 children underwent total gastric transposition according to the classical technique. Most of these patients (27, or 77.1%) had long gap esophageal atresia. The most frequently observed complications were compared to those reported in nine studies of gastric tube esophagoplasty comprising 184 patients. Mortality and graft failure rates were also compared. Seven patients (20.0%) presented with leaks, all of which closed spontaneously. Six children were reoperated, three experienced gastric outlet obstruction secondary to axial torsion of the stomach placed in the retrosternal space and the other three experienced delayed gastric emptying that required revision of the piloroplasty. There were two deaths (5.7%) and no graft failure. Strictures were observed in five patients (14.2%) and all of these were resolved with endoscopic dilatations. Six patients had diarrhea that spontaneously resolved. In the late follow-up period, all patients were on full feed and thriving well. The comparisons with gastric tube patients demonstrated that the total gastric transposition group presented with significantly less leaks and strictures (P = 0.0001 and 0.001, respectively). The incidence of death and graft failure was not statistically different. In conclusion, gastric transposition is as a simple technical procedure for esophageal replacement in children with satisfactory results, and is superior to gastric tube esophagoplasty.

Congenital anomalies of the esophagus

Normal anatomy, embryology, and congenital anomalies of the esophagus are discussed in this article. The classification, epidemiology, embryology, diagnosis, and management, including outcome following repair of esophageal atresia with or without an associated tracheoesophageal fistula, are described. The diagnosis and management of less common anomalies, such as congenital esophageal stenosis and congenital esophageal duplication, are outlined.

Multistaged esophageal elongation technique for long gap esophageal atresia: experience with 7 cases at a single institution

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Esophageal reconstruction for long gap esophageal atresia (LGEA) is still controversial. We successfully managed 7 cases of patients with LGEA by doing staged elongation of the native esophagus and subsequent end-to-end anastomosis. The technique and efficacy of this procedure are evaluated.

METHODS

During the last 10 years, 7 patients with LGEA (Gross type A, 5; B, 1; C, 1) underwent multiple extrathoracic esophageal elongations (ETEEs) of the upper esophagus and subsequent esophagoesophagostomy. Medical records were reviewed in regard to the number of ETEE before definitive esophageal reconstruction, interval between each ETEE, operation time, time before initiation of sham feeding, duration of hospital stay, and complications.

RESULTS

The definitive esophageal reconstruction was successfully achieved without major complications in all patients after 2 to 4 stages of ETEE. The interval between each ETEE was 72 days on average. The average operation time was 98 minutes. The elongation was 1 to 3.5 cm during each session. Oral sham feeding was recommenced 4.1 days after each ETEE, and the hospital stay was 9.6 days on average. Gastroesophageal reflux occurred in all patients, requiring antireflux surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude from our experience (a) that effective esophageal lengthening with preservation of the native esophagus was achieved with multiple ETEE in LGEA and (b) that this procedure allows oral sham feeding at home until esophageal reconstruction.

Dynamic esophageal lengthening for long gap esophageal atresia: experience with two cases

This report describes two infants with long gap esophageal atresia managed by dynamic esophageal lengthening. Preliminary traction on the atretic ends of the esophagus permitted subsequent primary anastomosis under significant tension. One patient has done well, while the other developed an anastomotic stricture requiring resection. The esophagus was preserved in both infants.