[Endoscopic adenotomy--clinical assessment of value and safety--an own experience]

Plasma Dissection Versus Tissue Dissection in Adenoid Surgery

Aim is to compare coblation versus conventional adenoidectomy, to evaluate whether this approach is adequate, safer and could be a coblation a good alternative of conventional adenoidectomy? It is a prospective randomized controlled study done at Civil Hospital Ahmedabad from January 2016 to January 2017 with 70 patients. The study includes children between age groups 5-11 years divided into Group A (38 children underwent coblation adenoidectomy) and Group B (32 children underwent conventional adenoidectomy) with an average follow-up period of 10 days, 1 month and 3 months. Information on average time of operation, intra-operative blood loss, post-operative pain, and time required regaining normal breathing pattern, presence of residual adenoid tissue 4 weeks after surgery and postoperative hemorrhage were gathered and compared. We found statistically significant differences in average operation time (p < 0.001), intra-operative blood loss (p < 0.001), post-operative pain (p < 0.0001) and time required regaining normal nasal breathing pattern (p < 0.001) presence of residual adenoid tissue 4 weeks after surgery (p < 0.0001) However, post operative hemorrhage (p > 0.5) was not significantly different between two groups. This study suggested a significantly less intra-operative or postoperative complications and morbidity in coblation adenoidectomy in comparison with conventional method. Coblation was associated with less pain and quick return to normal nasal breathing pattern. These findings indicate that coblation adenoidectomy is a safer, method and can be a better alternative of conventional method.

Partial resection of hypertrophic torus tubarius for recurred snoring: Case series

Sleep-disordered breathing symptoms may recur in some children after successful adenoidectomy. A potential etiology that warrants consideration is torus tubarius hypertrophy (TTH) as well as residual or recurrent adenoid hypertrophy. Here, we report our experience and the treatment outcomes with microscopic coblator-assisted partial resection of TTH.Seven children who had undergone coblator-assisted partial resection of TTH under microscopy from April 2000 through January 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patient age at the time of initial adenotonsillectomy and the interval between the first operation and partial resection of TTH were identified. Lateral cephalometry and scores on the Korean version of the obstructive sleep apnea-18 (KOSA-18) questionnaire were reviewed.The median age at the time of the first operation was 3.0 years and the average time interval between the first operation and subsequent tubal tonsillectomy was 44.0 months. The average width between the torus tubarius was 2.1 mm preoperatively. Symptoms of sleep-disordered breathing were relieved in all patients after operation. Preoperative and postoperative KOSA-18 scores were 73.5 and 35.5, respectively (P = .024). On polysomnography, the preoperative and postoperative apnea-hypopnea index scores were 22.9 and 4.7, respectively (P = .068). The patients were followed up for an average of 1.3 years. One patient developed a recurrence of symptoms and underwent a revision operation. Complications such as bleeding and nasopharyngeal stenosis were not observed.Otorhinolaryngologists should keep TTH in mind as one of the differential diagnoses for recurrent upper airway obstruction symptoms after adenoidectomy. Microscopic coblator-assisted partial resection of TTH is likely to be safe and effective.

Comparative analysis of conventional cold curettage versus endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy

Objective

To compare conventional cold curettage adenoidectomy with endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy in terms of operative time, primary blood loss, post-operative residual tissue and post-operative pain.

Methods

This prospective non-randomised study was carried out on 60 patients aged 5–12 years. One group underwent conventional cold curettage adenoidectomy and the other underwent endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy, with 30 patients per group.

Results

Mean operation duration was significantly higher for endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. Mean blood loss was 44.33 ml in conventional cold curettage adenoidectomy and 32.47 ml in endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. The pain grade was significantly lower in endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. Forty per cent of patients who underwent conventional cold curettage adenoidectomy had adenoid tissue post-surgery, while it was completely absent in endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy patients.

Conclusion

Coblation adenoidectomy has significant advantages over conventional adenoidectomy in terms of reduced blood loss, no post-operative residual tissue and lower pain grade on day 1 after surgery.