The enigma of tolerance and chimerism: variable role of T cells and chimerism in induction of tolerance with bone marrow

Mixed chimerism and split tolerance: mechanisms and clinical correlations

Establishing hematopoietic mixed chimerism can lead to donor-specific tolerance to transplanted organs and may eliminate the need for long-term immunosuppressive therapy, while also preventing chronic rejection. In this review, we discuss central and peripheral mechanisms of chimerism induced tolerance. However, even in the long-lasting presence of a donor organ or donor hematopoietic cells, some allogeneic tissues from the same donor can be rejected; a phenomenon known as split tolerance. With the current goal of creating mixed chimeras using clinically feasible amounts of donor bone marrow and with minimal conditioning, split tolerance may become more prevalent and its mechanisms need to be explored. Some predisposing factors that may increase the likelihood of split tolerance are immunogenicity of the graft, certain donor-recipient combinations, prior sensitization, location and type of graft and minimal conditioning chimerism induction protocols. Additionally, split tolerance may occur due to a differential susceptibility of various types of tissues to rejection. The mechanisms involved in a tissue's differential susceptibility to rejection include the presence of polymorphic tissue-specific antigens and variable sensitivity to indirect pathway effector mechanisms. Finally, we review the clinical attempts at allograft tolerance through the induction of chimerism; studies that are revealing the complex relationship between chimerism and tolerance. This relationship often displays split tolerance, and further research into its mechanisms is warranted.

«Greffe de visage»: regards portés sur la première allotransplantation composite partielle de la face

The first facial allograft was realised in Amiens 2005 November 27th. Breaking the technical limits of the so called possible and in appearance transgressing some cultural forbidden in organ transplantation, this resolutely innovative intervention open more than new perspective in the surgery of the reconstruction after disfigurement, but also a wide field of scientific investigations about dynamic and meaning of the facial function. Obviously, it also deals with numerous ethical and medical problems. The authors here shortly described the technical points of the surgery firstly done to restore oral function and facial expressively, the principles of the immunosuppressive treatment built to control any rejection time episode and the anatomical, neurological and functional results obtained after more than 18 months follow-up. Those perfectly demonstrate the perfect morphological, dynamic and cortical integration of the graft in the recomposed face. They also allow to confirm the legitimacy of the surgical indication and to oppose the factual objective arguments to the ethical reticences dealing with the facial and psychological identity of the receptor.

[Experimental and clinical experience of composite tissues allotransplantation in reconstructive surgery]

Composite tissue allotransplantation (CTA) is a new concept in reconstructive surgery to improve major physical defects with no current solution. Although not a life-saving procedure, tissue replacement by CTA offers great potential for improving quality of life but relies on lifelong immunotherapy. This new practice has become achievable with the refinement of microsurgical techniques, with experience gained from limb and scalp replantations, with the development of organ transplantation and the release of new immunosuppressive drugs. Experimental and clinical research made it possible. The first human cases of CTA proved the reality and the feasibility of the concept. While the early functional results of these allografts are encouraging, they will need to be assessed in the long-term, and development of less toxic - more efficient immonu-suppressive drugs will be a permanent requisite to the broadening of CTA. Although long-term outcome and potential adverse effects of chronic immunosuppression remain uncertain, as for organ transplantation, CTA is already a potential solution for some highly selected patients carrying physical disabilities such as large facial defects and bilateral hand amputation.

First human face allograft: early report

BACKGROUND

Extended soft tissue defects of the face are difficult to reconstruct, and autologous tissue transfers usually lead to poor cosmetic and functional outcomes. We judged that composite tissue transplantation could be valuable in facial reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

We transplanted the central and lower face of a brain-dead woman onto a woman aged 38 years who had suffered amputation of distal nose, both lips, chin, and adjacent parts of the cheeks. Transplantation consisted of revascularisation of right and left facial arteries and veins (ischaemic time 4 h), mucosal repair of oral and nasal vestibules, bilateral anastomoses of infraorbital and mental sensitive nerves, joining of mimic muscles with motor nerve suture on mandibular branch of the left facial nerve, and skin closure. Immunosuppressive treatment was with thymoglobulin, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. Two infusions of donor bone-marrow cells were given. Follow-up included routine tests, biopsies, physiotherapy, and psychological support.

FINDINGS

The initial postoperative course was uneventful. No surgical complication occurred. Bone-marrow graft and immunosuppression were well tolerated. Mild clinical signs of rejection were seen at day 20. Increased corticoids initially did not reverse rejection, but signs of rejection disappeared after three boluses of prednisone. Anatomical and psychological integration and recovery of sensation were excellent. At the end of the first postoperative week, the patient could eat, and speech improved quickly. Passive transmission of muscle contractions to the graft already exists; physiotherapy is being done to restore dynamic motions around the lips.

INTERPRETATION

The 4-month outcome demonstrates the feasibility of this procedure. The functional result will be assessed in the future, but this graft can already be deemed successful with respect to appearance, sensitivity, and acceptance by the patient.

Production of donor T cells is critical for induction of donor-specific tolerance and maintenance of chimerism

Nonmyeloablative conditioning has significantly reduced the morbidity associated with bone marrow transplantation. The donor hemopoietic cell lineage(s) responsible for the induction and maintenance of tolerance in nonmyeloablatively conditioned recipients is not defined. In the present studies we evaluated which hemopoietic stem cell-derived components are critical to the induction of tolerance in a total body irradiation-based model. Recipient B10 mice were pretreated with mAbs and transplanted with allogeneic B10.BR bone marrow after conditioning with 100-300 cGy total body irradiation. The proportion of recipients engrafting increased in a dose-dependent fashion. All chimeric recipients exhibited multilineage donor cell production. However, induction of tolerance correlated strictly with early production of donor T cells. The chimeras without donor T cells rejected donor skin grafts and demonstrated strong antidonor reactivity in vitro, while possessing high levels of donor chimerism. These animals lost chimerism within 8 mo. Differentiation into T cells was aborted at a prethymic stage in recipients that did not produce donor T cells. Moreover, donor Ag-driven clonal deletion of recipient T cells occurred only in chimeras with donor T cells. These results demonstrate that donor T cell production is critical in the induction of transplantation tolerance and the maintenance of durable chimerism. In addition, donor T cell production directly correlates with the deletion of potentially alloreactive cells.

Long-term limb allograft survival using anti-CD40L antibody in a murine model

BACKGROUND

Costimulation blockade has been shown to be effective in achieving donor-specific immune unresponsiveness in models of organ transplantation. This study represents the first application of blockade of the CD40 costimulatory pathway to a murine model of limb allotransplantation.

METHODS

Eighteen Balb/c mice (H-2K(d)) were randomized to four groups. The control group (n=5) received syngeneic limb transplants from Balb/c donors. The experimental groups were recipients of limb allografts from C57Bl/6 mice (H-2K(b)) and received either no treatment (n=5) or treatment with MR1 (hamster antimouse CD40 ligand monoclonal antibody) 500 microg intraperitoneally (IP) on days 0, 2, 4, 6, 14, 28, and 60 (n=5). A fourth group received myocutaneous allografts from C57Bl/6 donors and the same treatment with MR1 (n=5).

RESULTS

Untreated limb allografts were rejected at a mean of 9.6+/-1.1 days postoperatively. MR1-treated limb allografts underwent rejection of the skin component at a mean of 75+/-25 days whereas the musculoskeletal component survived to a mean of 222+/-84 days with two allografts surviving more than 10 months (P<0.001). The MR1-treated myocutaneous allografts were rejected after 16.2+/-2 days. All groups demonstrated acute rejection on histology except the treated limb allograft group, which was more suggestive of a chronic process. No chimerism was detected in this group by flow cytometry.

CONCLUSIONS

CD40 costimulatory blockade significantly prolonged limb-allograft survival, and the bone-marrow component may have played an important role. Tolerance was not achieved, and histologic evaluation suggested chronic rejection as a possible cause of allograft loss.