Patient attitudes regarding treatment-related erectile dysfunction at time of early detection of prostate cancer

Psychotherapy: a missing piece in the puzzle of post radical prostatectomy erectile dysfunction rehabilitation

OBJECTIVES

To measure the impact of psychotherapy associated to the use of Tadalafil in the improvement of erectile function after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

From 132 patients surgically treated for prostate cancer, thirty sequential patients with bilateral nerve sparing, low risk controlled disease and post-surgery erectile dysfunction (ED) took Tadalafil 20mg and underwent psychotherapy sessions, both weekly for three months. Patients were interviewed to establish the quality of erection using the instrument IIEF-5 and to measure psychological features impacting erectile function, aspects related to function, dysfunction, physical and emotional discomfort were evaluated with the help of an intensity scale.

RESULTS

The average age was 62.5 (46 to 77 years), 96.7% had a stable relationship, 56.6% of the patients accepted the diagnosis and 43.2% exhibited defense mechanisms (3.3% negation, 6.6% revulsion, 33.3% concern). A positive correlation was observed between erectile function and time exposed to treatment (IIEF-5 - 9.7 to 13.3, p=0.0006), with increased satisfaction with life in general (2.1 to 2.7, P=.028) and sexual life (3.1 to 3.7, P=.028), added to facilitation of expressing feelings/emotions (1.8 to 3.0, P=.0008). Satisfaction with relationship and intimacy with partner did not present significant improve (P=.12 and P=.61, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A holistic patient care with more complete ED rehabilitation includes psychotherapy with a positive correlation between erectile function and treatment exposition. Psychotherapy allowed the identification of important spouse related factors in this scenario.

Prostatic disease and sexual dysfunction

Prostatitis and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) are common prostatic diseases. Furthermore, the incidence of prostate cancer has recently shown a rapid increase, even in Korea. Pain caused by prostatitis may induce sexual dysfunction, including erectile dysfunction and ejaculatory disturbance. And BPH itself, or treatments for BPH, may affect sexual function. In addition, with increased detection of localized prostate cancer, surgical treatments and radiation therapy have also increased, and the treatments may cause sexual dysfunction. Aging is also an important factor in the deterioration of the quality of life of men. Deterioration of quality of life caused by prostate diseases may be affected not only by the prostate diseases themselves but also by the sexual dysfunction caused by the prostate diseases secondarily. Thus, consideration of these points at the time of treatment of prostate disease is required. Therapies suitable to each condition should be selected with an understanding of the close association of prostate diseases and associated sexual dysfunction with the quality of life of males.

To what extent can response shift theory explain the variation in prostate cancer patients' reactions to treatment side-effects? A review

BACKGROUND

There appears to be a conflict between published literature and in vitro evidence concerning the effects of treatment-induced side-effects on prostate cancer patients. There is an existing body of research which indicates evidence for a phenomenon whereby quality-of-life scores of patients' post-treatment reflect no difference to healthy controls and are perhaps even higher than before treatment, despite the substantial side-effects such as sexual and urinary dysfunction. However, when observing clinical patients at Good Hope Hospital urology clinic, it appears that whilst patients are seemingly unaffected by the threat of sexual and urinary side-effects of treatment at diagnosis, they become increasingly concerned about these consequences following treatment, indicating evidence for a response shift in the opposite direction. This phenomenon is investigated here.

METHODS

Thirteen papers were selected for review and considered in terms of their contribution to research into response shift as a coping process and in particular, response shift in prostate cancer.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Based on the existing literature, an underlying model is formulated for the moderation of the extent and direction of prostate cancer patients' response shift, incorporating the function of external influences such as perceived social support.

Quality of Life for Men With Prostate Cancer

The aim of this article is to selectively review the current research findings related to quality of life and prostate cancer. English-language journals indexed in MEDLINE, PubMed, and CINAHL published between 1999 and 2005 were searched for relevant articles using the following keywords: "quality of life and prostate cancer," "prostatectomy," "radiation therapy," "brachytherapy," "cryotherapy," or "androgen deprivation therapy." References in selected articles were reviewed for potentially relevant articles not identified through database searches. All treatment modalities have a significant impact on quality of life for men with local or advanced prostate cancer. Alterations in sexual functioning cause the most significant impact on quality of life for men. Quality of life is decreased in both the short and long term for men with prostate cancer. Oncology nurses must be cognizant of the challenges that a diagnosis of prostate cancer presents to the man with prostate cancer and his partner. Patients should be fully informed of the potential for impact on quality of life with all treatment modalities, and the oncology nurse can play an important role in both providing this information and supporting the patient when quality of life is impacted.

Ejaculatory disorders may affect screening for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Ejaculatory disorders will be experienced in most men who are treated for localized prostate cancer. Baseline rates of ejaculatory disorders are unknown in men at risk for prostate cancer. Therefore, we explored the prevalence of those disorders and associated bother in men without evidence of prostate cancer who participated in an annual prostate cancer screening event.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 1,273 men without clinical evidence of prostate cancer completed the self-administered Danish Prostate Symptom Score for sexual dysfunction. This questionnaire quantifies the rate of reduced ejaculatory volume, ejaculatory pain and the rate of coexistent erectile dysfunction.

RESULTS

Mean age was 57.6 years (range 40 to 89). Of all men 46% (563) had reduced ejaculatory volume and 66% (356) of affected men were bothered by this condition. Ejaculatory pain was reported in 11% (134) and 89% (118) of these men reported associated bother. Finally, 45% (554) reported erectile dysfunction and 73% (403) reported associated bother. Reduced ejaculatory volume was associated with erectile dysfunction (p<0.001) and advanced age (p<0.001). Ejaculatory pain was not associated with one of these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtually all men will be affected by ejaculatory disorders after definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Therefore, it is important to observe that half of these individuals already have underlying reduced ejaculatory volume before treatment. Moreover, 1 of 10 men will be affected by ejaculatory pain. Both disorders are a significant source of bother and should be considered when treatment related quality of life is assessed.

Normal urinary and sexual function in men without evidence of prostate cancer from Montreal, Canada

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rates of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and erectile dysfunction (ED), and of associated bother, in men with no evidence of prostate cancer who participated in a prostate cancer-screening event.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 366 men with no established diagnosis of prostate cancer completed a questionnaire addressing SUI, ED and associated bother. Socio-economic status and presence of comorbidities were also examined.

RESULTS

The mean (range) age of the men was 54.8 (33-80) years; 90% of the men (271) had no SUI, and 76% (231) reported no urinary bother. Conversely, 62% (189) reported some degree of ED and 27% (82) some degree of sexual bother. Urinary bother (P < 0.001), erectile function (P < 0.001), and sexual bother (P < 0.02) were associated with age. Of all the men, 36% had one or more comorbidities. Men with one or more comorbidities had worse erectile function than those men with no comorbidity (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Few studies address normative values of SUI and ED rates in men with no established diagnosis of prostate cancer. We quantified the rate of SUI and it was practically negligible. Conversely, some degree of ED affected most of the present screened population. These data may be used as baseline references to evaluate the magnitude of functional and bother detriments after various prostate treatments.

Vardenafil improved patient satisfaction with erectile hardness, orgasmic function and sexual experience in men with erectile dysfunction following nerve sparing radical prostatectomy

PURPOSE

Nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy (NS-RRP) results in erectile dysfunction in a significant number of patients. Vardenafil, a potent and selective phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor, is generally safe. It improves International Index of Erectile Function erectile function domain scores, and penetration and erection maintenance success rates in patients who have undergone NS-RRP. We report additional parameters important to patient perceptions regarding erection quality and satisfaction with sexual experience following NS-RRP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 440 men at 58 centers throughout the United States and Canada participated in this randomized, placebo controlled, double-blind trial with 3 phases, namely baseline (4-week untreated period), treatment (12 weeks) and followup (7 days). Participants received placebo (145), 10 mg vardenafil (146) or 20 mg vardenafil (149) at home on demand but no more than once per calendar day. Efficacy and satisfaction with erection quality and sexual experience were determined during the trial.

RESULTS

The 10 and 20 mg vardenafil doses were significantly superior to placebo for the International Index of Erectile Function domains for intercourse satisfaction, orgasmic function and overall satisfaction with sexual experience (vs placebo p <0.0009). Significant improvement in the satisfaction rate with erection hardness were demonstrated for each vardenafil dose compared with placebo (p <0.0001). Vardenafil was generally well tolerated. Common adverse events were headache, vasodilatation and rhinitis.

CONCLUSIONS

In this difficult to treat population of men with erectile dysfunction subsequent to NS-RRP on demand treatment with vardenafil during a 3-month period significantly improved key aspects of the sexual experience important to patient quality of life.

Erectile function after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

To evaluate erectile function after permanent prostate brachytherapy using a validated patient-administered questionnaire and to determine the effect of multiple clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters on penile erectile function.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 226 patients with preimplant erectile function determined by the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaire underwent permanent prostate brachytherapy in two prospective randomized trials between February 2001 and January 2003 for clinical Stage T1c-T2c (2002 American Joint Committee on Cancer) prostate cancer. Of the 226 patients, 132 were potent before treatment and, of those, 128 (97%) completed and returned the IIEF questionnaire after brachytherapy. The median follow-up was 29.1 months. Potency was defined as an IIEF score of > or =13. The clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated included patient age; preimplant IIEF score; clinical T stage; pretreatment prostate-specific antigen level; Gleason score; elapsed time after implantation; preimplant nocturnal erections; body mass index; presence of hypertension or diabetes mellitus; tobacco consumption; the volume of the prostate gland receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed dose (V(100/150/200)); the dose delivered to 90% of the prostate gland (D(90)); androgen deprivation therapy; supplemental external beam radiotherapy (EBRT); isotope; prostate volume; planning volume; and radiation dose to the proximal penis.

RESULTS

The 3-year actuarial rate of potency preservation was 50.5%. For patients who maintained adequate posttreatment erectile function, the preimplant IIEF score was 29, and in patients with brachytherapy-related ED, the preimplant IIEF score was 25. The median time to the onset of ED was 5.4 months. After brachytherapy, the median IIEF score was 20 in potent patients and 3 in impotent patients. On univariate analysis, the preimplant IIEF score, patient age, presence of nocturnal erections, and dose to the proximal penis predicted for postimplant erectile function. However, in multivariate analysis, only the preimplant IIEF score and the D(50) to the proximal crura were statistically significant predictors of brachytherapy-related erectile function.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a patient-administered validated quality-of-life instrument, brachytherapy-induced ED occurred in 50% of patients at 3 years. On multivariate analysis, preimplant erectile function and the D(50) to the proximal crura were the best predictors of brachytherapy-related erectile function. Because the proximal penis is the most significant treatment-related predictor of brachytherapy-related ED, techniques to minimize the radiation dose to the proximal penis may result in improved rates of potency preservation.

Finding help for sexual problems after prostate cancer treatment: a phone survey of men's and women's perspectives

As part of a larger postal survey, 320 survivors of prostate cancer who reported they were likely to seek help in the next year for a sexual problem were interviewed by phone about their strategies for finding help and the types of treatment that would help resolve post-cancer sexual problems. In addition, 164 sexual partners (including 160 wives, three female partners in committed relationships, and one gay male partner) were interviewed. Educational materials were used by patients and partners to answer questions about sexual dysfunction but were less useful in helping to find professional referrals or in actually resolving sexual problems, particularly for African-American couples. Men's preferred method of finding help was to consult a urologist or prostate cancer specialist to find a medical treatment for erectile dysfunction. Ninety-one percent of men had already tried to find medical help for erectile dysfunction, but previous attempts remained unsuccessful. Men wanted an oral medication that would resolve their sexual problem naturally, without major side effects. Only 43% of men said their partners had encouraged them to find help, and indeed a large minority of women had resigned themselves to having unsatisfying sex lives. These data suggest that including the partner in counseling about medical treatments for sexual function, and giving both men and partners realistic expectations about the limitations of existing treatments could boost the success of sexual rehabilitation after prostate cancer.

Defining sexual outcomes after treatment for localized prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The objective of this survey was to identify factors associated with good sexual outcomes in a large group of survivors of localized prostate carcinoma.

METHODS

A postal survey was sent to 2636 men in the Cleveland Clinic Foundation's Prostate Cancer Registry who either were treated with definitive radiotherapy or underwent prostatectomy for localized prostate carcinoma. The survey asked about demographic items, past and current sexual functioning, partner's sexual function and health, and a number of factors hypothesized to affect sexual satisfaction. Standardized questionnaires included the Sexual Self-Schema Scale-Male Version, the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), urinary and bowel symptom scales from the Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, and the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The return rate was 49%, yielding a sample of 1236 men at an average of 4.3 years post-treatment. Comparing responders with nonresponders suggested that the sample may have been somewhat biased toward men who were more interested in maintaining sexual function. At the time they were diagnosed with prostate carcinoma, 36% of men had erectile dysfunction (ED). Within the past 6 months, however, 85% of men reported having ED. Only 13% of men were having reliable, firm erections spontaneously, and another 8% of men were having erections with the aid of a medical treatment. Men were as distressed about loss of desire and trouble having satisfying orgasms as they were about ED. Of the 84% of men who reported having a current sexual partner, 66% indicated that she had a sexual problem. Younger age was associated strongly with better sexual outcome (global IIEF score). With demographic factors taken into account, better sexual outcome was related significantly to medical factors, including not having neoadjuvant or current antiandrogen therapy, undergoing bilateral nerve-sparing prostatectomy or brachytherapy, and having better mental and physical health composite scores on the SF-36. Sexual factors that were associated with a better outcome included having normal erections before treatment for prostate carcinoma, choosing a treatment based on the hope that it would preserve sexual function, having more sexual partners in the past year, and having a sexually functional partner.

CONCLUSIONS

The great majority of men who survive prostate carcinoma do not achieve a return to functional sexual activity in the years after treatment. The priorities a man places on sexuality and on having a sexually functional partner are important factors in sexual satisfaction at follow-up, over and above the influence of age and medical factors.

Potency preservation after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary results

We sought to assess potency preservation after three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in prostate cancer patients eligible for radical prostatectomy, conventional radiotherapy, 3D-CRT, or transperineal prostate implantation. Patients with more advanced disease are commonly treated with hormonal therapy, which can cause impotence, and were consequently excluded from the analysis. Between December 1991 and June 1998, 198 prostate cancer patients were treated with 3D-CRT at the University of California, Davis Medical Center. Fifty-two of these patients had a pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 10.0 ng/ml or less, a Gleason score of 6 or less, and a 1997 AJCC clinical stage T1bN0M0 to T2bN0M0. One patient was not evaluable. None of the 51 evaluable patients had diabetes mellitus. In 40 patients, the prostate gland only was irradiated to a total dose of 66 to 79.2 Gy by using daily 1.8-Gy fractions. In 11 patients, the prostate and seminal vesicles were treated to 44 to 55.8 Gy. Lymph nodes were not included in the clinical target volume. The median age was 68 years, and the median length of follow-up was 15 months. Potency in this study is defined as an erection sufficient for vaginal penetration. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to describe potency as a function of time after 3D-CRT. Of the 51 evaluable patients, 35 (69%) were potent, 15 were impotent, and 1 was sexually inactive before 3D-CRT. Kaplan-Meier estimates of the potency preservation rates 1, 2, and 3 years after 3D-CRT are 100%, 83%, and 63%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age, total radiation dose, and a history of transurethral resection of the prostate did not significantly affect potency preservation rates. Three (43%) of 7 patients who became impotent after 3D-CRT and used sildenafil were subsequently able to achieve erections sufficient for vaginal penetration. The preliminary results reported herein suggest that approximately two thirds of prostate cancer patients will retain their potency 3 years after 3D-CRT. Further follow-up is necessary to assess long-term potency after 3D-CRT. Sildenafil should be considered in patients who develop radiation-induced impotence.

Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor

OBJECTIVES

To measure the effect of treatment choice (pelvic irradiation [XRT] versus radical prostatectomy [RP] with or without nerve sparing) on sexual function and sexual bother during the first 2 years after treatment.

METHODS

We studied sexual function and sexual bother in 438 men recently diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer and treated with XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated health-related quality-of-life instrument that includes these two domains. To minimize the influence of other factors, we adjusted for age, comorbidity, general health, and previous treatment for erectile dysfunction. All subjects were drawn from CaPSURE, a national, longitudinal data base.

RESULTS

Sexual function improved over time during the first year in all treatment groups; however, during the second year, sexual function began to decline in the XRT group. Older patients who received XRT showed substantial declines in sexual function throughout the 2 years, and older patients who underwent RP experienced a return of very low baseline sexual function. Sexual function was improved by the use of nerve-sparing procedures or erectile aids. Alterations in sexual bother were ameliorated by many factors, including age, general health perceptions, and sexual function.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing all showed comparable rates of improvement in sexual function during the first year after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. However, in the second year after treatment, patients treated with XRT began to show declining sexual function; patients treated with RP did not.