Treatment outcome after tangential radiation therapy without axillary dissection in patients with early-stage breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes

Mapping of Level I Axillary Lymph Nodes in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer: Optimal Target Delineation and Treatment Techniques for Breast and Level I Axilla irradiation

PURPOSE

To map the locations of level I axilla (Ax-L1) lymph nodes (LNs), evaluate the clinical target volume (CTV) coverage defined by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) breast cancer atlas, and assess the optimal techniques for whole-breast and Ax-L1 irradiation (WBI + Ax-L1).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 76 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients with 1-4 positive LNs confirmed by axillary dissection. The locations of 116 involved Ax-L1 LNs on diagnostic computed tomography (CT) were mapped onto simulated CT images of a standard patient. Ax-L1 LN coverage by the RTOG atlas was evaluated, and a modified Ax-L1 CTV with better coverage was proposed. Treatment plans were designed for WBI + Ax-L1 with high tangential simplified intensity-modulated radiation therapy (HT-sIMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and for WBI + RTOG Ax-L1 with VMAT with a prescription dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions, respectively. The differences in dosimetric parameters were compared.

RESULTS

The RTOG atlas missed 29.3% of LNs. Modification by extending 1 cm caudal and 0.5 cm anterior to the RTOG-defined CTV borders allowed the modified Ax-L1 CTV to encompass 90.5% of LNs. All plans met the required prescription dose to WBI and Ax-L1. The mean dose and V20 and V5 of the ipsilateral lung were 11.7Gy, 23.0%, 38.1% for HT-sIMRT WBI + Ax-L1, and 8.9 Gy, 16.4%, 32.5% for VMAT WBI + Ax-L1 plans, respectively. The mean heart doses in the left-sided plans were 3.2Gy and 3.0Gy, respectively. The V30 of the humeral head and minimum dose to the axillary-lateral thoracic vessel junction were 2.0% vs 1.8%, and 45.5Gy vs 45.7Gy for VMAT WBI + Ax-L1 and VMAT WBI + RTOG Ax-L1 plans, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified Ax-L1 CTV with expansion of the caudal and anterior borders might provide better coverage. Compared with HT-sIMRT WBI + Ax-L1, VMAT WBI+ Ax-L1 provided an adequate dose to Ax-L1 with decreasing the doses to most normal tissues. Coverage of modified Ax-L1 did not increase the dose to organs-at-risk compared with coverage of RTOG Ax-L1.

Identifying Risk Factors for Regional Recurrence in Early-Stage Breast Cancer with pT1-2 and Negative Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy

Background

Due to the low rate of regional recurrence (RR) in early-stage breast cancer with pT1-2 and negative sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), no regional therapy is suggested for them. However, whether there is a subset of patients who were with high risk of regional failure and may benefit from regional treatment is still unknown. The current study was designed to identify the patients with high risk of RR, thereby providing clues for enhanced regional therapy.

Methods

We analyzed a total of 1124 breast cancer patients with pT1-2N0 from May 2004 to Dec 2014. All the patients were treated with breast-conservation surgery (BCS) and adjuvant whole-breast radiotherapy. The regional recurrence-free survival (RRFS), local regional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to detect factors in predicting the RRFS.

Results

In multivariable analysis, both T stage and molecular type were significant predictors of RRFS. Patients with T2 stage had a lower RRFS than those with T1stage. Triple-negative patients were more likely to suffer regional failure than the patients with other molecular types. The two predictors were then employed to divide all the patients into three groups based on the risk level of RR. Patients with both T2 and triple-negative molecular type had the lower RRFS, LRRFS, DFS and OS than the patients with one or no risk factor.

Conclusion

For early-stage breast cancer patients with negative SLNB, those who were with both T2 stage and triple-negative molecular type had a high rate of RR and enhance regional therapy may be needed for them.

Ipsilateral axillary recurrence after breast conservative surgery: The protective effect of whole breast radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) is one of the possible reasons for the low rate of axillary recurrence after breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from 4,129 consecutive patients with breast cancer ⩽2cm and negative sentinel lymph node who underwent BCS between 1997 and 2007. We compared the risk of axillary lymph node recurrence between patients treated by WBRT (n=2939) and patients who received partial breast irradiation (PBI; n=1,190) performed by a single dose of electron intraoperative radiotherapy.

RESULTS

Median tumour diameter was 1.1cm in both WBRT and PBI. Women who received WBRT were significantly younger and expressed significantly more multifocality, extensive in situ component, negative oestrogen receptor status and HER2 over-expression than women who received PBI. After a median follow-up of 8.3years, 37 and 28 axillary recurrences were observed in the WBRT and PBI arm, respectively, corresponding to a 10-year cumulative incidence of 1.3% and 4.0% (P<0.001). Multivariate analysis resulted in a hazard ratio of 0.30 (95% CI 0.17-0.51) in favour of WBRT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series of women with T1 breast cancer and negative sentinel lymph node treated by BCS, WBRT lowered the risk of axillary recurrence by two thirds as compared to PBI.

Is regional nodes radiotherapy an alternative to surgery?

Sentinel node biopsy (SN) in breast cancer treatment was introduced in the mid-1990s in order to be able to stage patients before decision of definitive surgery. Since then, both the pathological examinations of the SN and the systemic adjuvant treatment have improved and cause new challenges in the correct decision making regarding whether or not to radically treat the axilla in case of a positive SN. In SN positive patients, current St. Gallen guidelines support no completion ALND (axillary lymph node dissection) in clinically node-negative patients with 1-2 macrometastatic sentinel nodes operated with breast conservation and receiving tangential field adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). ALND is being questioned due to increased morbidity compared with SN biopsy alone, and to limited long term benefit on disease free survival in selected patients. An alternative to ALND is treating the axilla with nodal RT although this treatment is mostly used as adjuvant treatment after ALND in high risk patients. Few studies have investigated the benefit of nodal RT compared to ALND, and no consensus has yet been reached. Clinical decision making regarding treating the axilla should be based on relevant data, and in this review studies aiming at deciding whether or not and how the axilla should be treated in SN positive patients will be discussed. Furthermore treatment choice will be discussed, since besides ALND, both breast irradiation and nodal irradiation might cure residual disease after SN. Also the issue of improved systemic adjuvant treatment will be discussed in relation to eventually no regional axillary treatment.

Tangential vs. defined radiotherapy in early breast cancer treatment without axillary lymph node dissection: a comparative study

PURPOSE

Recent studies have demonstrated low regional recurrence rates in early-stage breast cancer omitting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients who have positive nodes in sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND). This finding has triggered an active discussion about the effect of radiotherapy within this approach. The purpose of this study was to analyze the dose distribution in the axilla in standard tangential radiotherapy (SRT) for breast cancer and the effects on normal tissue exposure when anatomic level I-III axillary lymph node areas are included in the tangential radiotherapy field configuration.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We prospectively analyzed the dosimetric treatment plans from 51 consecutive women with early-stage breast cancer undergoing radiotherapy. We compared and analyzed the SRT and the defined radiotherapy (DRT) methods for each patient. The clinical target volume (CTV) of SRT included the breast tissue without specific contouring of lymph node areas, whereas the CTV of DRT included the level I-III lymph node areas.

RESULTS

We evaluated the dose given in SRT covering the axillary lymph node areas of level I-III as contoured in DRT. The mean VD95% of the entire level I-III lymph node area in SRT was 50.28% (range, 37.31-63.24%), VD45 Gy was 70.1% (54.8-85.4%), and VD40 Gy was 83.5% (72.3-94.8%). A significant difference was observed between lung dose and heart toxicity in SRT vs. DRT. The V20 Gy and V30 Gy of the right and the left lung in DRT were significantly higher in DRT than in SRT (p<0.001). The mean heart dose in SRT was significantly lower (3.93 vs. 4.72 Gy, p=0.005).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated a relevant dose exposure of the axilla in SRT that should substantially reduce local recurrences. Furthermore, we demonstrated a significant increase in lung and heart exposure when including the axillary lymph nodes regions in the tangential radiotherapy field set-up.

Axillary dissection versus no axillary dissection in older T1N0 breast cancer patients: 15-year results of trial and out-trial patients

BACKGROUND

Our randomized trial found no survival advantage for axillary dissection (AD) compared observation only (no AD) in older patients with early breast cancer and a clinically negative axilla, indicating that AD is unnecessary. We compared characteristics and outcomes in out-trial patients with those in trial patients to provide indications as to whether AD can be safely omitted outside the trial setting.

METHODS

The trial started in 1996, recruiting 238 patients age 65-80 years with cT1cN0 breast cancer, randomized to conservative surgery with or without AD. Over the recruitment period, 109 eligible patients who refused to participate in the trial, also received conservative breast surgery with or without AD depending on patient preference/surgeon opinion. Trial and out-trial patients received conventionally-fractioned whole breast radiation and tamoxifen for five years. Endpoints were breast cancer mortality, overall survival, and cumulative incidence of axillary disease in patients not receiving AD.

RESULTS

After 15 years of follow-up, breast cancer mortality and overall survival did not differ between the AD and no AD arms, in either the trial or out-trial cohorts. The 15-year cumulative incidence of axillary relapse was 6% in the no AD arm of the trial group, and zero in the no AD arm of the out-trial group.

CONCLUSIONS

Outside the trial setting, older patients with T1N0 breast cancer can be safely treated by conservative surgery, postoperative radiotherapy and tamoxifen for five years (if ER-positive). Axillary surgery is appropriate only for the small proportion of patients who develop overt axillary disease during follow-up.

Axillary Irradiation as an Imperative Alternative to Axillary Dissection in Clinically Lymph Node-Negative but Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients?

At the moment, positive sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) of the axilla is followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) as standard of care. Recent data proves that omitting ALND after positive SLND in clinically lymph node-negative early stage breast cancer patients is feasible with low recurrence rates. The well known effect of radiotherapy to destroy occult tumor cells highly contributes to these results as a large extent of level I and II lymph nodes are unavoidably included in standard tangential radiation treatment fields. Reviewing the up to date published data on axillary lymph node treatment with radiotherapy, we hypothesize that full dosage coverage of level I and II of the axilla in early stage breast cancer will improve outcome and should be further evaluated.

A 10-year follow-up of treatment outcomes in patients with early stage breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes treated with tangential breast irradiation following sentinel lymph node dissection or axillary clearance

We compare long-term outcomes in patients with node negative early stage breast cancer treated with breast radiotherapy (RT) without the axillary RT field after sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) or axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We hypothesize that though tangential RT was delivered to the breast tissue, it at least partially sterilized occult axillary nodal metastases thus providing low nodal failure rates. Between 1995 and 2001, 265 patients with AJCC stages I-II breast cancer were treated with lumpectomy and either SLND (cohort SLND) or SLND and ALND (cohort ALND). Median follow-up was 9.9 years (range 8.3-15.3 years). RT was administered to the whole breast to the median dose of 48.2 Gy (range 46.0-50.4 Gy) plus boost without axillary RT. Chi-square tests were employed in comparing outcomes of two groups for axillary and supraclavicular failure rates, ipsilateral in-breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), distant metastases (DM), and chronic complications. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared using log-rank test. There were 136/265 (51%) and 129/265 (49%) patients in the SLND and ALND cohorts, respectively. The median number of axillary lymph nodes assessed was 2 (range 1-5) in cohort SLND and 18 (range 7-36) in cohort ALND (P < 0.0001). Incidence of AFR and SFR in both cohorts was 0%. The rates of IBTR and DM in both cohorts were not significantly different. Median PFS in the SLND cohort is 14.6 years and 10-year PFS is 88.2%. Median PFS in the ALND group is 15.0 years and 10-year PFS is 85.7%. At a 10-year follow-up chronic lymphedema occurred in 5/108 (4.6%) and 40/115 (34.8%) in cohorts SLND and ALND, respectively (P = 0.0001). This study provides mature evidence that patients with negative nodes, treated with tangential breast RT and SLND alone, experience low AFR or SFR. Our findings, while awaiting mature long-term data from NSABP B-32, support that in patients with negative axillary nodal status such treatment provides excellent long-term cure rates while avoiding morbidities associated with ALND or addition of axillary RT field.

Five-year analysis of treatment efficacy and cosmesis by the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To present 5-year data on treatment efficacy, cosmetic results, and toxicities for patients enrolled on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite breast brachytherapy registry trial.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 1440 patients (1449 cases) with early-stage breast cancer receiving breast-conserving therapy were treated with the MammoSite device to deliver accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) (34 Gy in 3.4-Gy fractions). Of 1449 cases, 1255 (87%) had invasive breast cancer (IBC) (median size, 10 mm) and 194 (13%) had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) (median size, 8 mm). Median follow-up was 54 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven cases (2.6%) developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), for a 5-year actuarial rate of 3.80% (3.86% for IBC and 3.39% for DCIS). Negative estrogen receptor status (p=0.0011) was the only clinical, pathologic, or treatment-related variable associated with IBTR for patients with IBC and young age (<50 years; p=0.0096) and positive margin status (p=0.0126) in those with DCIS. The percentage of breasts with good/excellent cosmetic results at 60 months (n=371) was 90.6%. Symptomatic breast seromas were reported in 13.0% of cases, and 2.3% developed fat necrosis. A subset analysis of the first 400 consecutive cases enrolled was performed (352 with IBC, 48 DCIS). With a median follow-up of 60.5 months, the 5-year actuarial rate of IBTR was 3.04%.

CONCLUSION

Treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity 5 years after treatment with APBI using the MammoSite device are good and similar to those reported with other forms of APBI with similar follow-up.

Tangential radiotherapy without axillary surgery in early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective trial

PURPOSE

To determine the risk of regional-nodal recurrence in patients with early-stage, invasive breast cancer, with clinically negative axillary nodes, who were treated with breast-conserving surgery, "high tangential" breast radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy, without axillary surgery or the use of a separate nodal radiation field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between September 1998 and November 2003, 74 patients who were >/=55 years of age with Stage I-II clinically node-negative, hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer underwent tumor excision to negative margins without axillary surgery as a part of a multi-institutional prospective study. Postoperatively, all underwent high-tangential, whole-breast radiotherapy with a boost to the tumor bed, followed by 5 years of hormonal therapy.

RESULTS

For the 74 patients enrolled, the median age was 74.5 years, and the median pathologic tumor size was 1.2 cm. Lymphatic vessel invasion was present in 5 patients (7%). At a median follow-up of 52 months, no regional-nodal failures or ipsilateral breast recurrences had been identified (95% confidence interval, 0-4%). Eight patients died, one of metastatic disease and seven of other causes.

CONCLUSION

In this select group of mainly older patients with early-stage hormone-responsive breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes, treatment with high-tangential breast radiotherapy and hormonal therapy, without axillary surgery, yielded a low regional recurrence rate. Such patients might be spared more extensive axillary treatment (axillary surgery, including sentinel node biopsy, or a separate nodal radiation field), with its associated time, expense, and morbidity.

Three-year analysis of treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity by the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial in patients treated with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI)

BACKGROUND

This report presents 3 years of data on treatment efficacy, cosmetic results, and toxicities for patients enrolled on the American Society of Breast Surgeons MammoSite (Cytyc, Bedford, Mass) Breast Brachytherapy Registry Trial.

METHODS

A total of 1440 patients (1449 cases) with early stage breast cancer who were undergoing breast-conserving therapy were treated with the MammoSite device to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) (34 Gy in 3.4 Gy fractions). Of these, 1255 (87%) cases had invasive breast cancer (IBC; median size = 10 mm), and 194 (13%) cases had ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; median size = 8 mm). Median follow-up was 30.1 months.

RESULTS

Twenty-three (1.6%) cases developed an ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) for a 2-year actuarial rate of 1.04% (1.11% for IBC and 0.59% for DCIS). No variables were associated with IBTR. Six (0.4%) patients developed an axillary failure. The percentages of breasts with good to excellent cosmetic results at 12 (n = 980), 24 (n = 752), 36 (n = 403), and 48 months (n = 67 cases) were 95%, 94%, 93%, and 93%, respectively. Breast seromas were reported in 23.9% of cases (30% in open-cavity implants and 19% in closed-cavity implants). Symptomatic seromas occurred in 10.6% of cases, and 1.5% of cases developed fat necrosis. A subset analysis of the first 400 consecutive cases enrolled was performed (352 with IBC, 48 DCIS). With a median follow-up of 37.5 months, the 3-year actuarial rate of IBTR was 1.79%.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment efficacy, cosmesis, and toxicity 3 years after treatment with APBI using the MammoSite device are good and similar to those reported with other forms of APBI with similar follow-up.

Avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection in selected patients with node-positive breast cancer

AIMS

Currently, it is standard practice to avoid ALND in patients with negative SLN, whereas this procedure is mandated for those with positive SLN. However, there has been some debate regarding the necessity of complete ALND in all patients with positive SLN. This review article discusses the issues related to eliminating the need for ALND in selected patients with positive nodes.

METHODS

A review of the English language medical literature was performed using the MEDLINE database and cross-referencing major articles on the subject, focusing on the last 10 years.

RESULTS

Currently, complete ALND is mandated in patients with SLN macrometastases as well as those with clinically positive nodes. It is not clear whether SLN biopsy is appropriate for axillary staging in patients with initially clinically positive nodes (N1) that become clinically node-negative (N0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although there is debate regarding whether ALND should be performed in patients with micrometastases in the SLN, it seems premature to abandon ALND in clinical practice. Moreover, it remains unclear whether it is appropriate to avoid complete ALND in patients with ITC-positive SLN alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of data from randomised trials, the long-term impact of SLN biopsy alone on axillary recurrence and survival rate in patients with SLN micrometastases as well as those with ITC-positive SLN remains uncertain. These important issues must be determined by careful analysis of the results of ongoing clinical trials.

Regional radiotherapy versus an axillary lymph node dissection after lumpectomy: a safe alternative for an axillary lymph node dissection in a clinically uninvolved axilla in breast cancer. A case control study with 10 years follow up

BACKGROUND

The standard treatment of the axilla in breast cancer used to be an axillary lymph node dissection. An axillary lymph node dissection is known to give substantial risks of morbidity. In recent years the sentinel node biopsy has become common practice. Future randomized study results will determine whether the expected decrease in morbidity can be proven.

METHODS

Before the introduction of the sentinel node biopsy, we conducted a study in which 180 women of 50 years and older with T1/T2 cN0 breast cancer were treated with breast conserving therapy. Instead of an axillary lymph node dissection regional radiotherapy was given in combination with tamoxifen (RT-group). The study group was compared with 341 patients, with the same patient and tumour characteristics, treated with an axillary lymph node dissection (S-group).

RESULTS

The treatment groups were comparable, except for age. The RT-group was significantly older than the S-group. The median follow up was 7.2 years. The regional relapse rates were low and equal in both treatment groups, 1.1% in RT-group versus 1.5% in S-group at 5 years. The overall survival was similar; the disease free survival was significant better in the RT-group.

CONCLUSION

Regional recurrence rates after regional radiotherapy are very low and equal to an axillary lymphnode dissection.

Axillary surgery in breast cancer patients

Surgeons have routinely removed ipsilateral axillary lymph nodes from women with breast cancer for over 100 years. The procedure provides important staging information, enhances regional control of the malignancy and may improve survival. As screening of breast cancer has increased, the mean size of newly diagnosed primary invasive breast cancers has steadily decreased and so has the number of women with lymph node metastases. Recognising that the therapeutic benefit of removing normal nodes may be low, alternatives to the routine level I/II axillary lymph node dissection have been sought. A decade ago sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was introduced. Because of its high accuracy and relatively low morbidity, this technique is now widely used to identify women with histologically involved nodes prior to the formal axillary node dissection. Specifically, SLNB has allowed surgeons to avoid a formal axillary lymph node biopsy in women with histologically uninvolved sentinel nodes, while identifying women with involved sentinel nodes who derive the most benefit from a completion axillary node dissection. Despite the increasing use of SLNB for initial management of the axilla in women with breast cancer, important questions remain regarding patient selection criteria and optimal surgical methods for performing the biopsy. This article discusses the evolution of axillary node surgery for women with breast cancer.

Long-term efficacy and patterns of failure after accelerated partial breast irradiation: a molecular assay-based clonality evaluation

PURPOSE

To determine the long-term efficacy and cosmetic results of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) by reviewing our institution's experience.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 199 patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated prospectively with adjuvant APBI after lumpectomy using interstitial brachytherapy. All patients had negative margins, 82% had Stage I disease, median tumor size was 1.1 cm, and 12% had positive lymph nodes. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 8.6 years. Fifty-three patients (27%) have been followed for >or=10 years.

RESULTS

Six ipsilateral breast tumor recurrences (IBTRs) were observed, for a 5-year and 10-year actuarial rate of 1.6% and 3.8%, respectively. A total of three regional nodal failures were observed, for a 10-year actuarial rate of 1.6%. Five contralateral breast cancers developed, for a 5- and 10-year actuarial rate of 2.2% and 5.2%, respectively. The type of IBTR (clonally related vs. clonally distinct) was analyzed using a polymerase chain reaction-based loss of heterozygosity assay. Eighty-three percent of IBTRs (n = 5) were classified as clonally related. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for an association with the development of an IBTR, regional nodal failure, or contralateral breast cancer. On multivariate analysis, no variable was associated with any of these events. Cosmetic results were rated as excellent/good in 99% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term results with APBI using interstitial brachytherapy continue to demonstrate excellent long-term local and regional control rates and cosmetic results. According to a polymerase chain reaction-based loss of heterozygosity assay, 83% of recurrences were classified as clonally related.

Recurrence after sentinel lymph node biopsy with or without axillary lymph node dissection in patients with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

A regional nodal recurrence is a major concern after a sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone in patients with breast cancer. In this study we investigated patterns and risk factors of regional nodal recurrence after SLNB alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1999 and March 2005, a series of 1,704 consecutive breast cancer cases in 1,670 patients (34 bilateral breast cancer cases) with clinically negative nodes or suspicious nodes for metastasis who underwent SLNB at a single institute (Saitama Cancer Center) were studied. All 1,704 cases were classified based upon presence or absence of a metastatic lymph node, treated with or without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The site of first recurrence was classified as local, regional node, or distant. The regional node recurrences were subclassified as axillary, interpectoral, infraclavicular, supraclavicular, or parasternal.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up period of 34 months (range, 2-83 months), first recurrence occurred in local sites in 32 (1.9%) cases, regional nodes in 26 (1.5%) cases, and distant sites in 61 (3.6%) cases. In 1,062 cases with negative nodes treated without ALND and 459 cases with positive nodes treated with ALND, 11 (1.0%) and 15 (3.3%) recurred in regional nodes, respectively, and 4 (0.4%) and 2 (0.6%) recurred in axillary nodes, respectively. Of 822 cases of invasive breast cancer with negative nodes treated with SLNB alone, 10 (1.4%) recurred in regional nodes, and 4 (0.5%) recurred in axillary nodes. In the 10 patients with regional nodal failure, all of the tumors were negative for estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) and were nuclear grade (NG) 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The axillary recurrence rate was low in patients treated with SLNB alone. Omitting ALND is concluded to be safe after adequate SLNB. Risk factors for regional nodal failure after SLNB alone are negative hormone receptor status and high NG.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy Alone Has No Adverse Impact on the Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer

We do not yet know the results from multicenter randomized trials comparing survival after sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Therefore, in this study, the prognostic significance of the type of axillary surgery is analyzed in combination with other known prognostic factors in patients with breast cancer. In a series of 1325 consecutive patients with unilateral breast cancer who underwent SLNB between January 1999 and June 2004 at a single institution, 884 underwent SLNB alone following an intraoperative negative histologic investigation and 441 underwent ALND. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to correlate with clinicopathologic features and treatment methods using both univariate and multivariate analyses Cox proportional hazard regression models. With a median follow-up period of 31 months, 29 (3.3%) and 37 (8.4%) patients relapsed after SLNB alone and ALND, respectively. Tumor size (Tis, T1-2 versus T3-4), histologic nodal involvement (negative versus positive), nuclear grade (NG) (1, 2 versus 3), lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI) (absent, weak versus intense), estrogen receptor (ER) status (positive versus negative), type of axillary surgery (SLNB alone versus ALND), type of breast surgery (partial versus total mastectomy), and radiation therapy (yes versus no) significantly correlated with DFS by univariate analysis, demonstrating better DFS in the former category than the latter for each variable. The multivariate analysis revealed that NG, LVI, ER status, and radiation therapy significantly correlated with DFS, and ER and histologic nodal involvement correlated with OS. As the type of axillary surgery had no impact on the prognosis of patients with breast cancer, a SLNB alone is safe as determined by a negative histologic investigation.

Impact of Her-2 Neu Overexpression on Outcome of Elderly Women Treated With Wide Local Excision and Breast Irradiation for Early Stage Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of Her-2 neu status in elderly patients managed with breast conservation strategy for stage I-II breast cancer.

METHODS

We conducted an IRB approved retrospective review of 153 women age 70 and older with stage I-II breast cancer, managed with wide local excision and breast radiation between January 1997 and December 2002. The subset of 106 patients had a known Her-2 neu status and was analyzed for primary patient and tumor characteristics. These characteristics were correlated with cause specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and combined nodal and distant failure (NDF). Her-2 neu positivity was confirmed with FISH HercepTestTM. Statistical tests included Cox regression, contingency table and Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 55 months and patient's median age was 76. Twenty two percent of patients were Her-2 neu positive and 78% were Her-2 neu negative. Her-2 neu positivity was significantly associated with high histologic grade (P = 0.008), T2 stage (P = 0.001) and positive axillary lymph nodes (P = 0.02) among 73 patients who had surgical assessment of axilla. Overall, only 15 patients (14%) received chemotherapy. There were no recurrences in the breast. Her-2 neu positivity predicted for NDF and CSS on multivariate analysis. Projected 5-year freedom from NDF was 70% for Her-2 neu positive and 97% for Her-2 neu negative patients (P < 0.01, log-rank). CSS was 86% for Her-2 neu positive and 98% for Her-2 neu negative patients (P < 0.01, log-rank). OS was no different between Her-2 neu positive and Her-2 neu negative patients (80% versus 85%, P = 0.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Her-2 neu amplification predicts development of NDF and negatively influences CSS, but not local control or OS in elderly patients treated with breast conservation. Similar to the trend in younger patients, Her-2 neu positivity may be used in the future to consider more aggressive treatment strategies in elderly patients.

A randomized trial comparing axillary dissection to no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer: results after 5 years of follow-up

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Axillary dissection, an invasive procedure that may adversely affect quality of life, used to obtain prognostic information in breast cancer, is being supplanted by sentinel node biopsy. In older women with early breast cancer and no palpable axillary nodes, it may be safe to give no axillary treatment. We addressed this issue in a randomized trial comparing axillary dissection with no axillary dissection in older patients with T1N0 breast cancer.

METHODS

From 1996 to 2000, 219 women, 65 to 80 years of age, with early breast cancer and clinically negative axillary nodes were randomized to conservative breast surgery with or without axillary dissection. Tamoxifen was prescribed to all patients for 5 years. The primary endpoints were axillary events in the no axillary dissection arm, comparison of overall mortality (by log rank test), breast cancer mortality, and breast events (by Gray test).

RESULTS

Considering a follow-up of 60 months, there were no significant differences in overall or breast cancer mortality, or crude cumulative incidence of breast events, between the 2 groups. Only 2 patients in the no axillary dissection arm (8 and 40 months after surgery) developed overt axillary involvement during follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients with T1N0 breast cancer can be treated by conservative breast surgery and no axillary dissection without adversely affecting breast cancer mortality or overall survival. The very low cumulative incidence of axillary events suggests that even sentinel node biopsy is unnecessary in these patients. Axillary dissection should be reserved for the small proportion of patients who later develop overt axillary disease.

Irradiation with standard tangential breast fields in patients treated with conservative surgery and sentinel node biopsy: using a three-dimensional tool to evaluate the first level coverage of the axillary nodes

Recent data show that axillary coverage can be obtained, but only through a selective CT-based treatment planning, as standard tangential fields are inadequate to deliver therapeutic doses. Currently, the replacement of axillary dissection with new techniques, such as sentinel node (SN) biopsy, makes it necessary to re-address the question about the real role of axillary irradiation, complicated by the differences in the anatomy of dissected and undissected axillary regions. The purpose of this paper is the dosimetric analysis of first axillary level coverage in standard irradiation of 15 breast-cancer patients treated with quadrantectomy and SN biopsy (negative finding). During surgery a clip on the site of the SN was positioned, marking the caudal margin of first axillary level. After the breast treatment plan was completed, the first axillary level was contoured on CT scans, from the site of the surgical clip up to the sternal manubrium, for coverage analysis with dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and three-dimensional isodose visualization. The maximum dose mean ranged from 5% to 80% of the prescribed dose (mean value 48.7%). The mean total dose received by the volume of interest was lower than 40 Gy in all but one patient. No patient had total irradiation of first nodal level; only one patient had 35% of the volume enclosed in the 100% isodose. Our analysis lead to the conclusion that therapeutic doses are not really delivered to first level axillary level nodes by a standard tangential field technique, and that specific treatment planning and beam arrangement are required when adequate coverage is necessary.

Treatment of breast carcinoma in patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes using radiotherapy versus axillary dissection

BACKGROUND

The role of axillary lymph node dissection (AxD) for patients with breast carcinoma who have clinically negative lymph nodes (cN0) and undergo breast-conserving therapy has been controversial. If patients do not undergo AxD, then it is uncertain whether specific lymph node irradiation should be given. The authors compared the results obtained from patients w ho underwent AxD with the results from patients who received axillary irradiation (AxR) using one of two radiotherapy techniques.

METHODS

Patients with T1-T2cN0 breast carcinoma were treated from 1983 to 2002 with either AxD (80 patients) or AxR (1134 patients received tangential-field [2-field] irradiation, and 303 patients received 3-field irradiation). The median follow-up was 161 months for the AxD group and 66 months for the AxR group (55 months for patients who received tangential-field irradiation, and 122 months for patients who received 3-field irradiation).

RESULTS

One patient in the AxD group and 35 patients in the AxR group had axillary recurrences. The 10-year cumulative axillary recurrence rates were 1.3% and 4.6% for the AxD group and the AxR group, respectively (P = 0.21). For patients with T1 tumors, the 10-year overall survival rates for the two groups were 94.7% and 92.7%, respectively (P = 0.34); and, for patients with T2 tumors, the 10-year overall survival rates were 92.5% and 89.1%, respectively (P = 0.34). In the AxR group, the 5-year axillary recurrence rates were 2.5% for patients who received tangential-field irradiation and 1.7% for patients who received 3-field irradiation (P = 0.18), and the 5-year regional recurrence rates for the two groups were 4.8% and 2.4%, respectively (P = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, positive lymphovascular invasion, outer tumor location, and larger tumor size were significant risk factors for regional failure.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with cN0 breast carcinoma, AxD and AxR yielded the same overall survival rates. Most patients can be treated safely with tangential-field irradiation alone. Patients who are at increased risk of regional failure may benefit from three-field irradiation.

Management of T1a Breast Cancer

Identification of early-stage breast cancers has increased over the past 2 decades primarily because of mammographic screening. The general guidelines to management of breast cancer may not apply to the smallest of these tumors, as their metastatic potential may be smaller than larger tumors. Tumors < 5 mm (T1a) carry an excellent prognosis, despite a variety of treatment approaches. However, some patients' cancer returns. There appear to be some histologic features that can predict a higher risk of axillary metastases, and therefore, a higher risk of distant metastases. Controversy exists over the extent of treatment, as to whether less than conventional treatment, such as mastectomy, axillary evaluation, and breast-conserving surgery and radiation, can be done. T1a lesions associated with extensive ductal carcinoma in situ and T1a lesions in young patients should be treated with caution if less than conventional breast treatment is to be considered. In older patients with good histologic features, axillary assessment may not be necessary. Very wide excision alone may be appropriate for some patients, but partial breast irradiation is under study and may provide a reasonable compromise. Systemic therapy for node-negative patients is not recommended. Recurrences within the breast occur later in early-stage breast cancers than with extensive-stage breast cancers, requiring annual imaging and evaluation for many years.

Evaluation of novel modified tangential irradiation technique for breast cancer patients using dose–volume histograms

PURPOSE

We have previously reported that entire axillary lymph node regions could be irradiated by the modified tangential irradiation technique (MTIT). In this study, MTIT was compared with a conventional irradiation technique (CTIT) using dose-volume histograms to verify how adequately MTIT covers the breast and axillary lymph node region and the extent to which it involves the lung and heart.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-four patients with early-stage breast cancer were treated by lumpectomy, axillary dissection, and postoperative radiotherapy. Twenty-two patients were treated with MTIT and 22 with CTIT. In 25 patients, the breast tumor was on the left and in 19 on the right. During axillary dissection, surgical clips were left as markers at the border of the axillary lymph node region. MTIT was planned by setting the dorsal edge of the radiation field on a lateral-view simulator film at the dorsal edge of the humeral head and the cranial edge of the radiation field at the caudal edge of the humeral head. CTIT was planned to ensure radiation of the breast tissue without considering the axillary region. In this study, all patients underwent computed tomography, and the CT data were transmitted on-line to a radiotherapy planning system, in which the dose-distribution computed tomography images and dose-volume histograms were calculated by defining the breast, axillary region (levels I, II, and III), lung, and heart region.

RESULTS

Dose-volume histogram analysis demonstrated that breast tissue was radiated with an 86.5-100% volume (median 96.5%) by MTIT and an 83-100% volume (median, 95%) by CTIT at >95% of the isocenter dose. The axillary lymph node regions at Levels I, II, and III were irradiated with 84-100% (median, 94.5%), 59-100% (median, 89%), and 70-100% (median, 89.5%) volumes, respectively, by MTIT and with 2-84% (median, 38%), 0-53% (median, 15%), and 0-31% (median, 0%) volumes, respectively, by CTIT at >70% of the isocenter dose. The ipsilateral lung was irradiated with a 5-22% volume (median, 11.5%) by MTIT and 5-15% volume (median 9%) by CTIT at >90% of the isocenter dose. In all 25 left-sided breast cancer patients, the volumes irradiated with an 80% isocenter dose were <30 cm(3).

CONCLUSION

The results of our study demonstrated that the breast tissue was sufficiently irradiated with both CTIT and MTIT planning, the axillary lymph node areas irradiated by MTIT were much wider than those irradiated by CTIT at all levels, and the lung and heart volumes irradiated by MTIT were small.

Is it necessary to perform prospective randomized studies before sentinel node biopsy can replace routine axillary dissection?

BACKGROUND AND METHODS

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is a useful way of assessing axillary nodal status in breast cancer patients. Recently, several surgeons have begun to abandon routine axillary dissection on the basis of negative SLN biopsy results. However, there is no long-term data comparing outcomes of SLN biopsy alone with those of axillary dissection. This paper reviews and discusses the significance of ongoing prospective randomized clinical trials aiming at the elimination of axillary dissection.

RESULTS

SLN biopsy is known to have a false-negative rate. It can thus be assumed that SLN biopsy alone may fail to remove the disease completely from the axilla in some patients. As a result, it is not known whether SLN biopsy alone will increase the axillary recurrence rate, particularly in patients with a high risk of axillary lymph node metastasis. Recently, moreover, locoregional control appears to be important for enhancing survival in conjunction with adjuvant systemic therapy. It is therefore still unclear to what extent the benefits of SLN biopsy outweigh the risks and, if so, for which patient groups.

CONCLUSION

Before SLN biopsy can replace routine axillary dissection, research using long-term regional controls and investigation of survival in a prospective randomized trial are essential. Except for clinical research studies, routine axillary dissection should not be abandoned until and unless there is documentation of extensive experience and a low false negative rate. Even with such evidence, however, patients undergoing SLN biopsy without concomitant axillary dissection should be informed of the risk of a false-negative result.

Radiation therapy as an adjuvant treatment after sentinel lymph node surgery for breast cancer

Radiation therapy is an effective treatment of micrometastatic disease involving lymph nodes. Correspondingly, radiation may be an important adjuvant treatment for selected patients who undergo sentinel lymph node surgery. The specific cohorts for whom radiation maybe of benefit include those at risk for a false-negative surgery, patients with a positive sentinel lymph node who elect to forgo an axillary dissection, and patients with drainage to the internal mammary lymph nodes. For these patients, radiation treatment fields must be specifically designed to include the appropriate nodal regions within the target treatment volumes.

Risk factors for regional nodal failure after breast-conserving therapy: regional nodal irradiation reduces rate of axillary failure in patients with four or more positive lymph nodes

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of, and risk factors for, regional nodal failure (RNF) and to evaluate the effectiveness of, and indications for, regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in patients with Stage I-II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

A total of 1500 cases of Stage I-II breast cancer were treated with breast-conserving therapy between February 1980 and December 2000. All patients underwent excisional biopsy, and 925 (62%) underwent re-excision. Level I-II axillary lymph node dissection was done in 94% of patients. The lymph nodes were pathologically involved in 335 patients (22%); 255 with 1-3 nodes and 80 with >/=4 nodes involved. All patients received whole breast irradiation to a median dose of 45 Gy, and 97% received a tumor bed boost to a median dose of 61 Gy. Treatment included the breast only in 1309 patients (87%), and the breast and regional lymphatics in 191 (13%).

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 35 patients had failure within the regional nodes: 12 patients (6%) who received RNI and 23 patients (2%) who did not. The 5- and 10-year rate for any RNF was 1.9% and 2.8%, respectively. The 5 and 10-year rates of axillary failure and supraclavicular failure were 0.6% and 1.0% and 0.9% and 1.6%, respectively. In patients with >/=4 positive lymph nodes, RNI reduced the 10-year rate of any RNF from 11% to 2% (p = 0.024), the rate of axillary failure from 5% to 0% (p = 0.019), and the rate of supraclavicular failure from 11% to 2% (p = 0.114). RNI did not affect the rate of axillary failure or supraclavicular failure in patients with 1-3 positive nodes. In node-negative patients, the rate of RNF was significantly greater if <6 nodes were removed at the time of axillary dissection. Multiple clinical, pathologic, and treatment-related factors were analyzed for association with RNF. On univariate analysis, RNF was associated with the number of nodes excised, number of positive nodes, percentage of positive nodes, size of nodal metastasis, presence of angiolymphatic invasion, estrogen receptor status, age, systemic chemotherapy, and RNI. Three subsets of patients had unusually high rates of RNF, those with >/=67% nodes positive (16%), nodal metastasis >/=2.0 cm (44%), or age </=35 years (14%). On multivariate analysis, the only significant predictor of RNF was the maximal size of the nodal metastasis. RNI did not improve the overall survival for any subset of patients. The number of lymph nodes excised had an impact on overall survival, with a 10-year survival rate of 33%, 65%, and 69% in patients with <6, 6-10, and >10 nodes excised, respectively (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Failure within the regional lymph nodes as an isolated site of first relapse is uncommon in patients with Stage I-II breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. RNI can significantly reduce the rate of RNF (axillary failure) in patients with >/=4 positive lymph nodes. The maximal size of the lymph node metastasis was found to be the only significant independent predictor of RNF, with nodal metastases >/=2.0 cm associated with extremely high regional failure rates. Despite this, young age and the extent of axillary dissection (particularly as related to the number of positive nodes) also appear to be important and should be considered when evaluating patients for RNI. Inadequate axillary dissection was not only associated with increased regional failure, but also reduced survival.

Age-related variations in the use of axillary dissection: a survival analysis of 8038 women with T1-ST2 breast cancer

PURPOSE

The use of axillary dissection (AD) in women with invasive breast cancer is increasingly questioned. This study analyzes the survival in women with T1-2 breast cancer according to age and AD use.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from the Breast Cancer Outcomes Unit Database were analyzed for 8038 women aged 50-89 years referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency between 1989 and 1998 with invasive T1-2,M0 breast cancer. Tumor and treatment characteristics were compared between women treated with and without AD (AD+ vs. AD-) according to three age groups: 50-64, 65-74 and 75+ years. Regional relapse and actuarial 5-year overall and breast cancer-specific survival were compared between AD+ and AD- women. Multivariate analysis of age, tumor and treatment factors, and adjusted hazard ratios with AD omission were performed.

RESULTS

AD was omitted more frequently with advancing age (4% vs. 8% vs. 22% in women aged 50-64, 65-74, and 75+ years, respectively, p <0.0001). Tumor characteristics were more favorable in AD- women, with fewer having Grade III disease, T2 tumors, or lymphovascular invasion (all p <0.0001). Women treated without AD were also less likely to undergo radiotherapy after lumpectomy or mastectomy (both p <0.0001). Systemic therapy use and regional relapse rates were comparable between AD- and AD+ women in each age-specific cohort. Multivariate analysis identified age, tumor size, grade, lymphovascular invasion, estrogen receptor status, clinical nodal palpability, type of surgery, and radiotherapy use as independent variables affecting survival. Hazard ratios adjusted for these variables showed AD omission to be associated with lower overall survival in the entire cohort (hazard ratio 1.52, p <0.0001) and lower breast cancer-specific survival in women aged 65-74 years (hazard ratio 1.99, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

AD was more frequently omitted with advancing age. The lack of differences in systemic therapy use, regional relapse, and breast cancer-specific survival among AD- compared with AD+ women aged 75+ years suggests that AD use may be selectively omitted in this elderly cohort. However, the lower survival associated with AD omission among women aged 65-74 years, and the lack of a survival advantage among AD- women aged 50-64 years despite more favorable tumor characteristics and comparable systemic therapy use support the hypothesis that definitive locoregional therapy has an impact on survival.

Are the axillary lymph nodes treated by standard tangent breast fields?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

With the increasing use of sentinel lymph node biopsy, a growing proportion of women with early-stage invasive breast cancer are undergoing breast conserving surgery without a formal axillary lymph node dissection. A frequent question raised is whether the level I-II axillary lymph nodes are treated with standard breast tangent fields. In an attempt to answer this question, surgical clips placed at the time of the level I-II axillary lymph node dissection were used as a surrogate for the location of the nodes and the simulator films for tangent fields of 45 patients were analyzed.

METHODS

Study criteria were as follows: five or more clips placed in the axilla, and all clips and the humeral head visualized on the medial tangent film. Clips were scored as "in" or "out" of the tangent field, as defined by the delineator wires. All technical parameters were analyzed to determine whether any reproducible techniques would consistently include all of the clips and, hypothetically, the axillary nodes at levels I and II.

RESULTS

All clips were included in the medial tangent breast radiation field in only 38% (17 of 45) of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The standard, two-field tangent breast fields do not reliably encompass the all level I-II axillary lymph nodes as defined by this study, but some of the nodes were treated in all 45 cases.

Axillary radiotherapy instead of axillary dissection: a randomized trial. Italian Oncological Senology Group

BACKGROUND

Surgical dissection of the axilla is a standard part of the treatment of breast cancer but, by itself, does not improve prognosis; furthermore, most patients with small-sized breast cancer and a clinically uninvolved axilla never develop axillary metastases. We evaluated disease-free and overall survival in patients with early breast cancer treated by breast-conservation surgery without dissection of axillary lymph nodes, receiving or not receiving axillary radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

From 1995 to 1998, 435 patients older than 45 years with breast cancer up to 1.2 cm were randomized, 214 to breast conservation without axillary treatment and 221 to breast conservation plus axillary RT.

RESULTS

After a follow-up of 28 to 68 months (median, 42 months), two women (1%) in the no axillary treatment group and one (.5%) in the axillary RT group developed axillary metastases. Rates of distant metastases and local treatment failure were also very low, and 5-year overall survival was 99%.

CONCLUSIONS

After a mean of 46 months of follow-up, our results indicate that axillary dissection can be safely avoided in patients with very small invasive carcinomas and a clinically negative axilla. Whether axillary RT should be added can be assessed only by longer follow-up.

Relationship of sentinel and axillary level I-II lymph nodes to tangential fields used in breast irradiation

PURPOSE

To evaluate the volume of nodal irradiation associated with breast-conserving therapy, we defined the anatomic relationship of sentinel lymph nodes and axillary level I and II lymph nodes in patients receiving tangential breast irradiation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis of 65 simulation fields in women with breast cancer treated with sentinel lymph node surgery and 39 women in whom radiopaque clips demarcated the extent of axillary lymph node dissection was performed. We measured the relationship of the surgical clips to the anatomic landmarks and calculated the percentage of prescribed dose delivered to the sentinel lymph node region.

RESULTS

A cranial field edge 2.0 cm below the humeral head the sentinel lymph node region was included or at the field edge in 95% of the cases and the entire extent of axillary I and II dissection in 43% of the axillary dissection cases. In the remaining 57%, this field border encompassed an average of 80% of cranial/caudal extent of axillary level I and II dissection. In 98.5% of the cases, all sentinel lymph nodes were anterior to the deep field edge and 71% were anterior to the chest wall-interface, whereas 61% of the axillary dissection cohort had extension deep to the chest wall-lung interface. If the deep field edge had been set 2 cm below the chest wall-lung interface, the entire axillary dissection would have been included in 82% of the cases, and the entire sentinel lymph node would have been covered with a 0.5-cm margin. The median dose to the sentinel lymph node region was 98% of the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSIONS

By extending the cranial border to 2 cm below the humeral head and 2 cm deep to the chest wall-lung interface, the radiotherapy fields used to treat the breast can include the sentinel lymph node region and most of axillary levels I and II.

Evaluation of level I and II axillary nodes included in the standard breast tangential fields and calculation of the administered dose: results of a prospective study

PURPOSE

To evaluate if Level I and II axillary nodes are included in the standard breast tangential fields, and to calculate the dose administered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In 35 patients treated with conservative surgery and axillary dissection, three clips were surgically positioned: one at the beginning of Level I, one between Level I and II, and another at the end of Level II. The breast was irradiated with two tangential fields. On simulation films, the volume between the clips was scored as "entirely included" or "not entirely included" in the treatment fields. Computed tomography (CT) scans were performed; CT data were imported into a treatment planning system, and three-dimensional plans were devised. Axillary Levels I and II were delineated on CT slices on the basis of anatomic landmarks. Fields and isodose curves previously obtained were superimposed to calculate the dose administered to the first two axillary node levels and to 90% of both volumes.

RESULTS

On X-rays, the volume between clips corresponding to Level I was completely included in the medial field in 66.7% of cases and in the lateral field in 63.7% of cases, whereas the volume of Level II was entirely included in the medial field in 54.5% of cases and in the lateral field in 45.4% of cases. The median dose administered to Level I and II was 38.58 Gy +/- 11.01 (range 3.46-47.14) and 20.65 Gy +/- 14.07 (range 0.95-38.94), respectively. The median dose to 90% of both volumes of Level I and II was 6.75 Gy +/- 14.01 (range 1.9-39) and 1.75 Gy +/- 9.72 (range 0.8-29), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The standard tangential fields do not entirely include Levels I and II axillary nodes.

Factors correlating with lymph node metastases in patients with T1 breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Identification of reliable predictors of axillary metastases (ALNM) may be useful in selecting appropriate management for patients with T1-size breast cancer. This study was undertaken to determine the degree of correlation between ALNM and several variables, including age, race, menopausal status, palpability, tumor size, positive margin on initial excision, histology, grade, lymphatic invasion (LI), estrogen receptor status (ER), progesterone receptor status, S-phase, and ploidy.

METHODS

Data from 1416 patients with T1 breast cancers treated at Columbia-Presbyterian Medical Center between 1989 and 1998 was reviewed. Patients with multifocal tumors were excluded.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 57.5 years (SD = 12.0); 65% of the patients were postmenopausal. One hundred thirty-one patients with Tla (< or =0.5 cm), 435 with T1b (0.6-1.0 cm), and 850 patients with T1c (1.1-2.0 cm) lesions were studied. The overall rate of ALNM was 23%. AM was identified in 11% of T1a, 15% of T1b, and 29% of T1c patients. Statistically significant factors from univariate analysis were age, palpability, skin changes, tumor size, LI, histology, grade, ER status, and positive margin on initial excision.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary staging by either sentinel lymph node biopsy or level I/II axillary dissection is indicated for most T1 breast cancer patients. Omission of axillary staging can be considered for highly selected patients with T1a cancers.

Observation of the breast cancer patient with a tumor-positive sentinel node: implications of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial

Axillary lymph node status has been the most important prognostic factor for breast cancer throughout the past century. During the past decade, intraoperative lymphatic mapping with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) has been investigated as an alternative staging modality. This technique may be as accurate as ALND, and certainly is less invasive. Adjuvant treatment recommendations, which historically were made on the basis of lymph node status alone, now take into account primary tumor features, molecular markers, and patient characteristics. This evolution of current treatment patterns is driven in part by the diminishing size of tumors, the simultaneous decrease in the presence of axillary metastases, and a better understanding of tumor-specific risk factors. How do these trends affect the interpretation of a tumor-positive sentinel node (SN)? Can an axilla with a positive SN be observed? Should it be observed? This review examines the implications of a positive SN in the context of smaller tumor size, decreased nodal disease, and increased reliance on alternative prognostic factors for treatment decisions. The historical data comparing ALND to no ALND in clinically node-negative patients is reviewed and discussed in the context of observation for a positive SN. These are the issues underlying the ACOSOG Z0010 and Z0011 trials.

The relationship between lymphatic vessell invasion, tumor size, and pathologic nodal status: can we predict who can avoid a third field in the absence of axillary dissection?

PURPOSE

Tangential (2-field) radiation therapy to the breast and lower axilla is typically used in our institution for treating patients with early-stage breast cancer who have 0-3 positive axillary nodes, as determined by axillary dissection, whereas a third supraclavicular/axillary field is added for patients with 4 or more positive nodes. However, dissection may result in complications and added expense. We, therefore, assessed whether clinical or pathologic factors of the primary tumor could reliably predict, in the absence of an axillary dissection, which patients with clinically negative axillary nodes have such limited pathologic nodal involvement that they might be effectively treated with only tangential fields. This would eliminate both the complications of axillary dissection and the added complexity and potential morbidity of a supraclavicular/axillary field.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this study, 722 women with clinical Stage I or II unilateral invasive breast cancer of infiltrating ductal histology, with clinically negative axillary nodes, at least 6 lymph nodes recovered on axillary dissection, and central pathology review were treated with breast-conserving therapy from 1968 to 1987. Pathologic nodal status was assessed in relation to clinical T stage, the presence of lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI), age, histologic grade, and the location of the primary tumor.

RESULTS

LVI, T stage, and tumor location were each significantly correlated with nodal status on univariate analysis. Ninety-seven percent of LVI-negative patients had 0-3 positive axillary nodes compared to 87% of LVI-positive patients. There was no association between T stage and extent of axillary involvement within LVI-negative and LVI-positive subgroups. In a logistic regression model, only LVI remained a significant predictor of having 4 or more positive nodes, although tumor size was of borderline significance. The odds ratio for LVI (positive vs. negative) as a predictor of having 4 or more positive nodes was 3.9 (95% CI, 2.0-7.6).

CONCLUSION

For patients with clinical T1-2, N0, infiltrating ductal carcinomas, the presence of LVI is predictive of having 4 or more positive axillary nodes. Only 3% of patients with clinical T1-2, N0, LVI-negative breast cancers had 4 or more positive nodes on axillary dissection. Such patients may be reasonable candidates for treatment with tangential radiation fields in the absence of axillary dissection.

The significance of extracapsular extension of axillary lymph node metastases in early-stage breast cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate if extracapsular extension (ECE) of axillary lymph node metastases predicts for a decreased rate of disease-free survival or an increased rate of regional recurrence of breast carcinoma.

METHODS

The study population consisted of 368 patients with T1 or T2 breast cancer and pathologically-positive lymph nodes treated with breast-conserving therapy between 1968 and 1986. The median number of sampled lymph nodes was 10. Median follow-up time for the surviving patients was 139 months (range 70-244). Twenty percent of the patients were treated with supraclavicular RT, and 64% received both axillary and supraclavicular RT, with a median dose to the nodes of 45 Gy. The following factors were evaluated: presence of ECE, number of sampled lymph nodes (LN), number of involved LN, size of primary tumor, histologic grade of tumor, presence of lymphatic vessel invasion (LVI), presence of an extensive intraductal component (EIC), radiation dose, use of adjuvant chemotherapy, and age of patient. Recurrences were reported as the 5-year crude sites of first failure, and were divided into breast recurrences (LR), regional nodal failure (RNF, defined as isolated axillary, supraclavicular, or internal mammary recurrence), and distant metastases (DM).

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-two patients (33%) had ECE and 246 patients did not. The median number of LN with ECE was 1 (range 1-10) and 20% of patients had ECE in > or =4 LN. Patients with ECE tended to be older (median age 51 vs. 47, p = 0.01), and had a higher number of involved LN (median 3 vs. 2, p = 0.005) than patients without ECE. Forty-three percent of patients with ECE had > or =4 involved LN compared to 15% of patients without ECE (p<0.0001). Models of ECE and the above factors revealed no significant correlation between ECE and either disease-free or overall survival. There was no statistically significant increase in local, regional nodal, or distant failures in patients with ECE as compared to patients without ECE.

CONCLUSION

In this population of patients with nodal involvement, the presence of ECE correlates with the number of involved LN but does not appear to add predictive power to models of local, regional, or distant recurrence when the number of positive LN is included.

Management of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer: a national patterns of care study of 17,151 patients

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rates of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) and axillary irradiation (AI) in patients with breast cancer and to identify the factors influencing them.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Routine performance of ALND in the treatment of breast cancer has become controversial. AI has been proposed as an alternative to ALND, and it has been suggested that AI in addition to ALND may decrease local failure in high-risk patients.

METHODS

A joint study was conducted by the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons and the American College of Radiology. A total of 17,151 patients with stage I and II breast cancer treated at 819 institutions in 1994 were studied.

RESULTS

A total of 15,992 patients underwent ALND (93%). The mean ages of patients who did and did not undergo ALND were 60.4 and 73.0 years. Univariate analysis demonstrated significantly decreased rates of ALND for women age 70 or older (86% vs. 97%), patients with clinical T1 a tumors (81% vs. 93%), grade I histology (90% vs. 95%), and patients with favorable tumor types (88% vs. 94%). The ALND rate did not vary between palpable and nonpalpable tumors. Multivariate analysis of variables affecting the rate of ALND identified type of surgery, age, tumor size, histology, and payer status as significant. A total of 889 patients received AI. Patients not undergoing ALND were more likely to receive AI (10% vs. 5%). A total of 1.6% of patients with no lymph node metastasis underwent AI, 8.9% of those with one to three positive nodes underwent AI, 24.0% of those with four to nine positive lymph nodes underwent AI, and 29.9% of those with > or = 10 positive lymph nodes underwent AI. Multivariate analysis of variables affecting the proportion of patients who received AI and had undergone ALND identified nodal status and type of surgery as significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary lymph node dissection continues to be routinely applied in the treatment of breast cancer, and AI remains underused in patients at high risk for local regional relapse.

Utility of three-dimensional planning for axillary node coverage with breast-conserving radiation therapy: early experience

PURPOSE

To examine the dosimetric axillary nodal coverage with standard tangential breast radiation fields and determine the utility of three-dimensional treatment planning for such coverage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six consecutive patients who were to undergo whole-breast irradiation underwent computed tomographic scanning with 5-mm sections at the time of treatment simulation. Contours were made with a commercial workstation for the lower axillary tissues, lungs, and heart. Axillary coverage was examined with three-dimensional isodose visualization and dose-volume histograms for four plans for each patient: (a) standard tangential radiation fields designed to cover only the breast, with clinical setup; (b) standard tangential fields with beam's-eye-view optimization of collimator angles for axillary and breast coverage; (c) standard tangential fields with adjustment of field width and collimator angles; and (d) customized fields, by adjusting width, collimator angle, and gantry angle and by using customized blocks.

RESULTS

With plan a, only one patient had a simulated mean axillary dose greater than 90% of that prescribed. Underdosing occurred primarily in the posterior-superior axillary nodal region. Plan b improved axillary coverage; five patients had a simulated mean axillary dose of 89% or more of the prescribed dose, with adequate whole-breast coverage and no increased pulmonary or cardiac doses. Adjusting the field width and gantry angle further improved simulated mean axillary doses; however, customized blocking was then required to avoid increased mean pulmonary and cardiac doses and unacceptable contralateral breast doses.

CONCLUSION

When coverage of lower axillary nodal tissue is desired at breast irradiation, three-dimensional planning with beam's-eye-view adjustment of tangential fields should be considered.

Accuracy of AJCC staging for breast cancer patients undergoing re-excision for positive margins. American Joint Committee on Cancer

BACKGROUND

The current AJCC protocol for breast cancer staging does not include additional tumor found at the time of re-excision in the calculation of tumor size. We hypothesize that the AJCC protocol may result in understaging and undertreatment of breast cancer patients who have additional tumor found at re-excision.

METHODS

In a retrospective chart review of breast cancer patients, patients with tumor present at re-excision for positive margins were placed in group 1 (n=72); patients with no tumor present at re-excision, or who underwent a single, negative margin procedure were placed in group 2 (n=147).

RESULTS

Patients in group 1 had a higher risk of nodal metastases when compared to patients in group 2. Mean tumor size did not differ significantly between the subgroups. Positive re-excision was strongly associated with lymph node metastases on multivariate analysis after correction for age, grade, stage, and lymphatic invasion (odds ratio=3.13, 95% CI=1.58 6.18, P=.0011).

CONCLUSIONS

Current AJCC guidelines may result in undertreatment of breast cancer patients with positive re-excisions. The presence of additional tumor at the time of re-excision should be considered when determining the need for systemic therapy, and may be relevant in determining T stage.

Outcome in breast cancer managed without an initial axillary lymph node dissection

PURPOSE

The role of an elective axillary lymph node dissection (AxLND) in the initial management of patients with early stage breast cancer has recently become controversial. The objective of this current study is to review the reasons as to why patients from a single institution were managed without an initial AxLND and their outcome in terms of survival and recurrence rates.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 126 women referred to the Princess Margaret Hospital with the diagnosis of breast cancer who did not undergo an initial AxLND.

RESULTS

The median age of this population was 69 years, with the vast majority (93%) being post-menopausal. Fifty-seven patients had T1 tumors and the remainder had T2-3 tumors. Adjuvant radiation therapy to the breast was administered to 65 patients and systemic adjuvant treatment was administered to 24 patients. In approximately one-third of these cases, the reasons cited for not performing an AxLND were related to the patient's age, a medical contraindication, or the patient's choice. The 5-year actuarial cause-specific survival was 92%; the local breast relapse-free rate (RFR) was 85% and the axillary RFR was 86%. No patients in this study experienced debilitating symptoms from their axillary disease. Only 16 patients underwent a subsequent AxLND, with the lymph nodes being pathologically uninvolved in six of these patients.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the concept that. in selected patients, adopting an approach of a delayed AxLND does not appear to compromise the patients' outcome, with only 13% of patients requiring a subsequent AxLND.