Prognosis of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

Change in hip laxity after anterior capsular suture in total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach

It is clinically unclear whether anterior capsular suture improves hip laxity in total hip arthroplasty using direct anterior approach (DAA-THA). This study aimed to clarify the impact of anterior capsular suture for hip laxity in DAA-THA. In this study, 121 hips of 112 patients who underwent DAA-THA were prospectively enrolled. Mean age was 64.7 ± 10.1 years, and the subjects consisted of 35 hips in 32 men and 86 hips in 80 women. To evaluate hip laxity after implantation, axial head transfer distance (HTD) when the hip was pulled axially at 15 kg was compared before and after anterior capsular suture at the hip intermediate and 10° extension positions. HTD in the intermediate and 10° extension positions averaged 5.9 ± 4.6 mm and 6.3 ± 4.6 mm before the suture, and 2.6 ± 2.7 mm and 2.9 ± 3.1 mm after the suture, respectively. HTD after the suture significantly decreased in both hip positions (p < 0.0001). The amount of change by the suture was greater in cases with greater pre-suturing HTD. In DAA-THA, the anterior capsular suture significantly improved hip laxity against axial traction force, it may contribute to improvement of postoperative hip stability, especially in cases with greater laxity before the suture.

Hip Abduction Can Be Considered the Sole Posterior Precaution Strategy to Lower the Rate of Impingement After Posterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty With Large Femoral Head: A Computer Simulation Study

BACKGROUND

Studies suggest that posterior hip precautions are unnecessary after total hip arthroplasty; however, many surgeons and patients choose to follow these precautions to some extent. In this study, we hypothesized that 20° of hip abduction would be sufficient to prevent impingement and dislocation in motions requiring hip flexion when using larger prosthetic heads (≥36 mm) when the acetabular implant is placed within a reasonable orientation (anteversion:15-25° and inclination: 40-60°).

METHODS

Using a robotic hip platform, we investigated the effect of hip abduction on prosthetic and bony impingement in 43 patients. For the flexed seated position, anterior pelvic tilt angles of 10 and 20° were chosen, while anterior pelvic tilt angles of 70 and 90° were chosen for the bending forward position. An additional 10° of hip external rotation and 10 or 20° of hip internal rotation were also added to the simulation. One hip received a 32-mm head; otherwise, 36-, 40-mm, or dual-mobility heads were used. The study power was 0.99, and the effect size was 0.644.

RESULTS

In 65% of the cases, bone-bone impingement between the calcar and anterior-inferior iliac spine was the main type of impingement. The absolute risk of impingement decreased between 0 and 16.3% in both tested positions with the addition of 20° hip abduction.

CONCLUSION

With modern primary total hip arthroplasty stems (low neck diameter) and an overall acceptable cup anteversion angle, small degrees of hip abduction may be the only posterior hip precaution strategy required to lower the risk of dislocation among patients. Future studies can potentially investigate the concept of personalized hip precautions based on preoperative computer simulations, utilized implants, hip-spine relations, and final implant orientation.

Laceration of the Sciatic Nerve After Closed Reduction of a Dislocated Total Hip Arthroplasty

Sciatic nerve injury after closed reduction of a dislocated total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an exceedingly rare but tremendously devastating complication. Closed reduction is the standard of care and is typically associated with a low complication rate. There have only been seven sciatic nerve injuries after closed reduction of a dislocated THA reported in the literature, and none were secondary to nerve laceration. We report a case of sciatic nerve laceration after attempted closed reduction of a dislocated THA. This resulted in complete loss of sensory and motor sciatic nerve function. This case highlights the importance of a detailed neurologic examination before and after closed reduction of a dislocated total hip, the importance of using careful reduction maneuvers, and transitioning to open reduction when necessary.

Variability in Acetabular Component Position in Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty Who Have Concomitant Spine Pathology

BACKGROUND

Hip instability following total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be a major cause of revision surgery. Physiological patient position impacts acetabular anteversion and abduction, and influences the functional component positioning. Osteoarthritis of the spine leads to abnormal spinopelvic biomechanics and motion, but there is no consensus on the degree of component variability for THAs performed by anterior approach. Therefore, we sought to present guidelines for changes in acetabular component positioning between supine and standing positions for patients undergoing primary THA by a uniform anterior approach.

METHODS

Perioperative patient radiographs of the pelvis and lumbar spine were collected. Images were used to determine acetabular component positioning and degree of coexisting spinal pathology, categorized as a Lane Grade (LG). Final analysis of variance was performed on a sample size of 643 anterior primary THAs.

RESULTS

From supine to standing position, as the severity of lumbar pathology increased the change in anteversion also increased (LG:0 = -0.11° ± 4.65°, LG:1 = 2.02° ± 4.09°, LG:2-3 = 5.78° ± 5.72°, P < .001). The mean supine anteversion in patients with absent lumbar pathology was 19.72° ± 5.05° and was lower in patients with worsening lumbar pathology (LG:1 = 18.25° ± 4.81°, LG:2-3 = 16.73° ± 5.28°, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing primary THA by anterior approach with worsening spinal pathology have larger increases in component anteversion when transitioning from supine to standing positions. Consideration should be given to this expected variability when placing the patient's acetabular component.

Identification of risk factors for treatment failure of closed reduction and abduction bracing after first-time total hip arthroplasty dislocation

INTRODUCTION

After a first-time total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocation, a closed reduction followed by partial immobilization in an abduction brace is the recommended therapy. Despite modern abduction braces the success rate of conservative therapy is limited and evidence is scarce. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for failure of conservative treatment after THA dislocation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Eighty-seven patients, with conservative treatment of a first-time dislocation of a primary or revision THA, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Success was defined as a stable THA for a minimum of 6 months. Re-dislocation, open reduction or revision was defined as failure. The following risk factors were analyzed: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score, time of dislocation, head size, cup orientation, leg length, center of rotation and offset.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven percent of all patients experienced a re-dislocation, despite standardized conservative therapy. A BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², early THA dislocation, and low cup anteversion were associated with a statistically significantly higher risk for re-dislocation. None of the other risk-factors achieved statistical significance. A multifactorial risk-factor analysis was performed to assess whether a cup position outside of Lewinnek's safe zone in combination with gender, BMI and time to dislocation showed statistical significance for re-dislocation. Both BMI ≥ 25 kg/m² and early dislocation showed a statistically higher failure rate. Cup position and gender were not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

BMI ≥ 25 kg/m², early THA dislocation and low cup anteversion were identified as significant risk factors for failure of conservative treatment with an abduction brace for first-time THA dislocation.

Acetabular Lip Augmentation Devices for the Unstable Total Hip Replacement-A Systematic Review

Background

The optimal management strategy for instability afte total hip arthroplasty remains unclear. Acetabular lip augmentation devices may offer an operative solution for recurrent instability. This systematic review reports the clinical outcomes of acetabular lip augmentation devices in comparison to other treatment options.

Methods

A literature search strategy was performed of Medline, EMBASE, and CENTRAL on September 19, 2020, for all studies reporting outcomes of acetabular lip augmentation devices for recurrent dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Non-English language articles were excluded. Clinical and survivorship data were collated and analyzed.

Results

Thirteen studies describing acetabular augmentation were included for analysis. A total of 644 hips in 636 patients were augmented with a mean age of 75 years (39 to 103). Five different augmentation devices were used. The posterior lip augmentation device (PLAD, DePuy) was the most used (406 hips). Overall, acetabular lip augmentation devices had a 10% postoperative dislocation rate at a mean follow-up of 49 months (0.2 to 132). The PLAD had a 3.9% subsequent dislocation rate with a mean follow-up of 51 months (0.2 to 132). Only one study compared the PLAD to a dual-mobility cup, which demonstrated shorter operative times with the PLAD but higher rates of dislocation and revision surgery.

Conclusion

The quality of literature on lip acetabular augmentation devices is poor. In these studies, the postoperative dislocation rate after lip acetabular augmentation was relatively high. The PLAD (DePuy) has the most evidence and may offer a therapeutic option for recurrent instability, in very specific clinical situations.

Outcome of revision surgery in recurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The cause of recurrent dislocation following primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) is multifactorial. A re-dislocation rate of up-to 34% following revision is reported. The aim of this study was to determine the re-dislocation rates following revision for recurrent THR dislocation.

METHODOLOGY

Patients who underwent revision for recurrent dislocation between January 2008 and January 2015 were identified. We identified the date and type of primary implant, overall number and reasons for dislocation, revision implant details and complication data.

RESULTS

Over an 8-year period, 24 patients underwent revision. The median age was 77 (68-85) years, median time to first dislocation was 78 (23-160) months and median number of dislocations was 3 (2-4) with a mean follow-up of 18 months. Socket Mal-Orientation (10) and Abductor deficiency (5) were the main causes of recurrent dislocation. 21 patients (88%) underwent revision of both components, 1 patient underwent isolated cup revision and 2 patients had revision of acetabular component with insertion of a BioBall. There were no dislocations within 90 days of revision surgery. 4 patients had late dislocations (3 recurrent, 1 isolated). There was no significant increase risk of dislocation after revision surgery in the neck of femur group (p = 0.467).

CONCLUSIONS

We report favourable outcomes for revision of both components for recurrent dislocation with no dislocations within 90 days. The overall late dislocation rate was 16.7%, however, these patients have settled following closed reduction. Due to its multifactorial aetiology, both component revision can be considered in this patient population.

Association between Hemiarthroplasty vs Total Hip Arthroplasty and Major Surgical Complications among Patients with Femoral Neck Fracture

Previous studies have shown better clinical outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to hemiarthroplasty (HA) for displaced femoral neck fracture. However, few studies have focused on the surgical risks of the two procedures. Therefore, we investigated the perioperative complications of HA and THA in femoral neck fracture, using a large nationwide inpatient database. A total of 286,269 patients (281,140 patients with HA and 5129 with THA) with a mean age of 81.7 were enrolled and HA and THA patients were matched by a propensity score to adjust for patient and hospital characteristics. Patients in a matched cohort were analyzed to compare complications and mortality. The systemic complication rate was not significantly different after a propensity score matching of 4967 pairs of patients. However, the incidence of both hip dislocation and revision surgery was more frequent in the THA group (Risk difference (RD), 2.74; 95% Confidence interval (CI), 2.21–3.27; p < 0.001; RD, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.27–3.37; p < 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in 30 day in-hospital mortality among the two groups. The risk of dislocation and reoperation was higher for THA than for HA in elderly patients with a femoral neck fracture in this retrospective study using a nationwide database.

Intra-prosthetic dislocation of dual mobility hip prosthesis: an original and unusual complication

A 78-year-old female presented with dislocation of a dual mobility hip prosthesis. On standard radiographs after closed reduction, the hip prosthesis appeared to be properly reduced, but clinically the hip was unstable. A Computed Tomography showed a round foreign body, that was in fact a dislocation of the intra-prosthetic implant. This was confirmed intra-operatively during revision surgery. Intra-prosthetic dislocation is a specific complication of dual mobility system. Classically, it's a late complication, linked to the wear of retention area of the polyethylene insert. In this case report we describe an unusual reason of intra-prosthetic dislocation caused by a reduction maneuver of a dislocated dual mobility total hip prosthesis, which to our knowledge has never been documented with Computed Tomography imagery and intra operative pictures. The aim of this article is to analyse the advantages and complications of this implant and to establish recommendations. Dealing with an intra-prosthetic dislocation of a dual mobility hip prosthesis, we recommend attempting a reduction under general anesthesia to avoid mechanical complications. In case of persistent instability after reduction, we recommend performing a Computed Tomography scan.

Effect of dislocation timing following primary total hip arthroplasty on the risk of redislocation and revision

INTRODUCTION

There is little data regarding timing of index dislocation in patients who undergo primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and subsequent risk of redislocation and revision.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 2013, 21,490 primary THAs were performed at a single institution. 189 patients (190 hips) had a first episode of dislocation within one year of index surgery (0.9 %). 32 patients (32 hips) were excluded for the following reasons: complex THA secondary to fracture malunion, Crowe III/IV developmental hip dysplasia, periprosthetic fracture, prior hip surgery, incomplete information, and hip abductor avulsion. The final cohort consisted of 157 patients (158 hips) who experienced dislocation within 1 year of primary non-complex THA. 88 patients were female (56%), mean age was 61 years (SD = 14), and mean follow-up was 76 months (range 0-229). Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression models with fractional polynomial models were used to estimate the association between timing of index dislocation and subsequent redislocation and revision surgery.

RESULTS

69 patients (44%) redislocated at final follow-up. Revision for any cause occurred in 26 out of 157 hips (17%). Time lapse from index THA to first dislocation was significantly associated with the risk of redislocation (p = 0.004) and with the risk of revision (p = 0.04). For every additional 7 days from surgery, risk of redislocation increased by a factor of 1.1 and risk of revision was increased by a factor of 1.13.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates there is a lower risk of redislocation and revision in patients who have a first episode of dislocation closer to primary THA.

Causes of and treatment options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty

The second most common complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is dislocation. The majority of dislocations occur early in the post-operative period and are due to either patient-associated or surgical factors. The patient-associated factors that have been implicated as causes of post-operative dislocation include previous surgery, lumbar spine fusion surgery and/or neurological impairment. The surgical factors include surgical approach, component orientation and prosthetic and/or bony impingement. In order to delineate the cause of the hip instability a thorough history and physical and a radiographic assessment (possibly including advanced imaging) needs to be performed. Approximately two thirds of cases are successfully treated; one third of cases will require surgical treatment (e.g., revision arthroplasty (including constrained liners, the use of elevated rim liners and dual mobility implants or trochanteric advancement). In this review, we discuss the causes leading to dislocation following THA and evaluate the different treatment options available.

Can an Augmented Reality Headset Improve Accuracy of Acetabular Cup Orientation in Simulated THA? A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Accurate implant orientation reduces wear and increases stability in arthroplasty but is a technically demanding skill. Augmented reality (AR) headsets overlay digital information on top of the real world. We have developed an enhanced AR headset capable of tracking bony anatomy in relation to an implant, but it has not yet been assessed for its suitability as a training tool for implant orientation.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) In the setting of simulated THA performed by novices, does an AR headset improve the accuracy of acetabular component positioning compared with hands-on training by an expert surgeon? (2) What are trainees' perceptions of the AR headset in terms of realism of the task, acceptability of the technology, and its potential role for surgical training?

METHODS

Twenty-four study participants (medical students in their final year of school, who were applying to surgery residency programs, and who had no prior arthroplasty experience) participated in a randomized simulation trial using an AR headset and a simulated THA. Participants were randomized to two groups completing four once-weekly sessions of baseline assessment, training, and reassessment. One group trained using AR (with live holographic orientation feedback) and the other received one-on-one training from a hip arthroplasty surgeon. Demographics and baseline performance in orienting an acetabular implant to six patient-specific values on the phantom pelvis were collected before training and were comparable. The orientation error in degrees between the planned and achieved orientations was measured and was not different between groups with the numbers available (surgeon group mean error ± SD 16° ± 7° versus AR 14° ± 7°; p = 0.22). Participants trained by AR also completed a validated posttraining questionnaire evaluating their experiences.

RESULTS

During the four training sessions, participants using AR-guidance had smaller mean (± SD) errors in orientation than those receiving guidance from the surgeon: 1° ± 1° versus AR 6° ± 4°, p < 0.001. In the fourth session's assessment, participants in both groups had improved (surgeon group mean improvement 6°, 95% CI, 4-8°; p < 0.001 versus AR group 9°, 95% CI 7-10°; p < 0.001). There was no difference between participants in the surgeon-trained and AR-trained group: mean difference 1.2°, 95% CI, -1.8 to 4.2°; p = 0.281. In posttraining evaluation, 11 of 12 participants would use the AR platform as a training tool for developing visuospatial skills and 10 of 12 for procedure-specific rehearsals. Most participants (11 of 12) stated that a combination of an expert trainer for learning and AR for unsupervised training would be preferred.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel head-mounted AR platform tracked an implant in relation to bony anatomy to a clinically relevant level of accuracy during simulated THA. Learners were equally accurate, whether trained by AR or a surgeon. The platform enabled the use of real instruments and gave live feedback; AR was thus considered a feasible and valuable training tool as an adjunct to expert guidance in the operating room. Although there were no differences in accuracy between the groups trained using AR and those trained by an expert surgeon, we believe the tool may be useful in education because it demonstrates that some motor skills for arthroplasty may be learned in an unsupervised setting. Future studies will evaluate AR-training for arthroplasty skills other than cup orientation and its transfer validity to real surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, therapeutic study.

[Revision total hip arthroplasty : Significance of instability, impingement, offset and gluteal insufficiency]

BACKGROUND

Instability is a common cause of failure in primary and, especially, revision total hip arthroplasty. The reasons for instability include implant malpositioning, impingement, inadequate offset reconstruction, and gluteal insufficiency. Impingement following THA and revision THA is divided into prosthetic and bony impingement, and in addition to instability also causes pain in the area of the hip joint. Offset reconstruction during revision THA is of particular biomechanical importance, since insufficient reconstruction leads not only to instability and pain but also to dislocation. Abductor deficiency often occurs after revision THA and leads to a change in gait pattern, instability and pain.

AIM

Current diagnostic and treatment procedures for instability, impingement, insufficient offset reconstruction and abductor deficiency after THA and revision THA are summarized.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Diagnosis of an instable THA and painful THA includes patient history, physical examination and medical imaging. Thus, in almost all cases, the cause can be determined and treated. Dislocation after primary THA in the early postoperative period can often be treated conservatively if accurate component placement is observed, while a late-onset and recurrent dislocation after primary and revision THA usually needs surgical procedures. To avoid bony and prosthetic THA impingement intraoperative control is absolutely necessary. If possible, the offset reconstruction is based on the condition of the native hip joint and can be achieved by using modular prostheses, neck adapters and different head lengths. Abductor deficiency also occurs frequently after revision THA and can be treated surgically if severe clinical symptoms and fatty degeneration of the abductors have been diagnosed.

Course of dislocated posterior hip arthroplasty: A continuous 232-patient series at a mean 10 years' follow up (range, 1-22 years)

BACKGROUND

Dislocation rates in posterior total hip arthroplasty (THA) range between 2% and 5%, but long-term course (recurrence of dislocation or revision surgery) is not known, most series having short follow-up or small populations. We therefore conducted a retrospective study on a large series, to determine long-term rates of recurrence and surgical revision and recurrence risk factors.

HYPOTHESIS

Long-term follow-up of a large cohort of THA dislocations enables recurrence rate and factors to be determined.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

Five hundred and nine cases of THA dislocation were admitted to our center between 1994 and 2008. A hundred and twenty seven incomplete files and 150 patients who had received their THA elsewhere were excluded, leaving 232 patients: 150 female, 82 male. Mean age at THA (163 primary, 69 revision) was 63 years (range, 15-90 years), and 65 years (range 20-90 years) at first dislocation, with a mean interval to dislocation of 25 months. Minimum follow-up was 8 years up to 2016, or 1 year taking account of deaths (111 deaths). There were 46 anterior, 185 posterior and 1 multidirectional dislocations. The following potential recurrence factors were assessed: gander, age, body-mass index (BMI), etiology, surgical history, bearing diameter and type, component fixation means, dislocation direction, and time to dislocation.

RESULTS

A hundred and thirty three of the 232 patients (57%) showed at least 1 recurrence, at a mean 38 months (range, 0.5-252 months); 78 experienced a second and 32 a third recurrence. Ninety-nine (43%) had only 1 dislocation, without recurrence, but 17 of these (17%) underwent reoperation for other causes. The reoperation rate was 17/232 (7%) excluding recurrent instability, and 84/232 (36%) for instability. Fourty-eight months after the first dislocation, 84/133 cases of recurrence (63%) had been reoperated on: 16 complete replacements, 18 bearing replacements, 42 dual mobility cups, one large diameter cup, seven Lefèvre retentive cups. The rate of revision surgery for instability was high, at 84/232 (36%), and higher again in relation to recurrence (84/133: 63%). Only posterior dislocation emerged as a factor for recurrence (HR=1.774, 95% CI [1.020-3.083]), the other tested factors showing no correlation.14 of the 84 revision surgeries for instability (16.6%) were followed by recurrence, without identifiable risk factors.

CONCLUSION/DISCUSSION

The recurrence rate was 57%, with posterior dislocation as the only risk factor. The rate of revision surgery for recurrence was 84/232 (36%), with 14/84 revision procedures (16.6%) followed by further recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective, without control group.

Investigation of the Unstable Total Hip Arthroplasty

The investigation of recurrent instability after total hip arthroplasty requires a thorough history and physical examination focused on characterizing the dislocation events and the patient factors that contribute to instability. Radiographic studies include plain radiographs, in particular a cross-table lateral, and computed tomography to accurately assess the implant orientation relative to the patient's native anatomy. More advanced imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging may be useful to assess abductor tendon integrity. A classification system, based on etiology of recurrent instability, is available and helpful to guide treatment strategy. Finally, emerging research has debunked the previous characterization of an acetabular "safe zone" and further identified lumbar spine disease and surgical fusion as a significant risk factor for recurrent instability. Current and future research efforts target radiographic assessment of lumbopelvic alignment in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of recurrent total hip arthroplasty instability.

The unstable total hip arthroplasty

One of the most common causes for revision surgery following total hip arthroplasty (THA) is dislocation.

Dislocation is associated with a considerable amount of suffering and risks for the patient, and extra costs for the health care system.

Compared with degenerative arthritis, the dislocation rate is doubled for avascular necrosis and multiplied by three times for congenital dislocation, four for fracture, five for nonunion, malunion or a failed hip arthroplasty, and eleven times after surgery for prosthetic instability.

In analysing instability the cause may be assessed as 1) locally caused within the hip with explanatory radiographic findings, 2) locally caused without explanatory radiographic findings or 3) non-locally caused, i.e. non-compliant patient, neuromuscular or cognitive disorders.

Revision strategies for instability are typically directed to correct the underlying aetiology, but also to strive for an upsizing of the head and liner.

Cite this article: Ullmark G. The unstable total hip arthroplasty. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:83-88. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000022.

Evaluation and management of chronic total hip instability

Given the increasing number of total hip arthroplasty procedures being performed annually, it is imperative that orthopaedic surgeons understand factors responsible for instability. In order to treat this potentially complex problem, we recommend correctly classifying the type of instability present based on component position, abductor function, impingement, and polyethylene wear. Correct classification allows the treating surgeon to choose the appropriate revision option that ultimately will allow for the best potential outcome.

Effective prevention of recurrent dislocation following primary cemented Endo-MarkIII/SP2 total hip arthroplasty using a posterior lip augmentation device

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was performed to determine the effectiveness of preventing recurrent dislocation following primary cemented Endo-MarkIII/SP2 total hip replacement using a posterior lip augmentation device (PLAD).

METHODS

Between January 2003 and Dezember 2006, 27 PLADs were used in the treatment of recurrent hip dislocation in 27 patients who had received a cemented primary total hip arthroplasty using Endo-MarkIII/SP2 (Waldemar LINK, Hamburg, Germany) components. The mean number of dislocations prior to stabilization with this specific device was 2.6 (range 2-4, SD ± 0.4) with a mean time to revision surgery of 10 months (IQR 13). The mean age of the patients at time of revision surgery was 81.5 years (range 70-94, SD ± 6.9). The control group evaluating the clinical outcome using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) also received a cemented primary total hip arthroplasty using the same implants. A retrospective clinical and radiological review was carried out at a mean follow-up of 68.5 months (range 30-103, SD ± 17.7).

RESULTS

Of the 27 patients, 6 had died at the time of the latest review, with the posterior lip augmentation device still in situ and without reported further dislocation after PLAD application. In 2 of the remaining 21 patients recurrent dislocation occurred, thus a subsequent revision of respective implants had to be performed to achieve persistent joint stability. At latest follow-up no deep infection or implant loosening occurred.

CONCLUSION

Surgical treatment of recurrent dislocation following primary cemented Endo-MarkIII/SP2 total hip replacement using a posterior lip augmentation device is a safe and effective procedure which can lead to a secondary stabilization of the total hip arthroplasty in about 90 % of the patients.

Reconstruction of chronic abductor deficiency after revision hip arthroplasty using an extensor mechanism allograft

This study reports the clinical outcome of reconstruction of deficient abductor muscles following revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), using a fresh-frozen allograft of the extensor mechanism of the knee. A retrospective analysis was conducted of 11 consecutive patients with a severe limp because of abductor deficiency which was confirmed on MRI scans. The mean age of the patients (three men and eight women) was 66.7 years (52 to 84), with a mean follow-up of 33 months (24 to 41). Following surgery, two patients had no limp, seven had a mild limp, and two had a persistent severe limp (p = 0.004). The mean power of the abductors improved on the Medical Research Council scale from 2.15 to 3.8 (p < 0.001). Pre-operatively, all patients required a stick or walking frame; post-operatively, four patients were able to walk without an aid. Overall, nine patients had severe or moderate pain pre-operatively; ten patients had no or mild pain post-operatively. At final review, the Harris hip score was good in five patients, fair in two and poor in four. We conclude that using an extensor mechanism allograft is relatively effective in the treatment of chronic abductor deficiency of the hip after THA when techniques such as local tissue transfer are not possible. Longer-term follow-up is necessary before the technique can be broadly applied.

The effect of temperature on the viability of human mesenchymal stem cells

Introduction

Impaction allograft with cement is a common technique used in revision hip surgeries for the last 20 years. However, its clinical results are inconsistent. Recent studies have shown that mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) seeded onto allograft can enhance bone formation. This in vitro study investigates whether the increase in temperature related to the polymerisation of bone cement will affect the viability of human MSCs.

Methods

The viability of human MSCs was measured after incubating them at temperatures of 38°C, 48°C and 58°C; durations 45 seconds, 80 seconds and 150 seconds. A control group was kept at 37°C and 5% carbon dioxide for the duration of the investigation (7 days). During the course of the study the human MSCs were analysed for cell metabolic activity using the alamarBlue™ assay, cell viability using both Trypan Blue dye exclusion and calcein staining under fluorescent microscopy, and necrosis and apoptosis using Annexin V and propidium iodide for flow cytometric analysis. A one-way analysis of variance with a priori Dunnett’s test was used to indicate the differences between the treatment groups, when analysed against the control. This identified conditions with a significant difference in cell metabolic activity (alamarBlue™) and cell viability (Trypan Blue).

Results

Results showed that cell metabolism was not severely affected up to 48°C/150 seconds, while cells in the 58°C group died. Similar results were shown using Trypan Blue and calcein analysis for cell viability. No significant difference in apoptosis and necrosis of the cells was observed when human MSCs treated at 48°C/150 seconds were compared with the control group.

Conclusions

The study suggests that human MSCs seeded onto allograft can be exposed to temperatures up to 48°C for 150 seconds. Exposure to this temperature for this time period is unlikely to occur during impaction allograft surgery when cement is used. Therefore, in many situations, the addition of human MSCs to cemented impaction grafting may be carried out without detrimental effects to the cells. Furthermore, previous studies have shown that this can enhance new bone formation and repair the defects in revision situations.

Acetabular cup revision combined with tensor facia lata reconstruction for management of massive abductor avulsion after failed total hip arthroplasty

We report on 17 patients with massive abductor avulsions after total hip arthroplasty (THA) treated with medialization of the acetabular component and tensor fascia lata (TFL) reconstruction. All patients had severe limp, positive Trendelenburg sign, and avulsion of the abductor insertion confirmed on MRI. Mean age was 69 years (range, 50-83 years), and mean follow-up period was 36 months (range, 18-78 months). After surgery, 9 patients had no limp (47%), 8 patients had a mild limp, and abductor power improved from mean 2.5/5 to mean 3.8 (P < 0.0001). At latest follow-up, the Harris Hip Score was excellent in 6 hips (37%), good in 7 (43%) hips, and fair or poor in 3 (23%). Two patients with mild limp were not satisfied with their procedure.

Ipsilateral Fracture Shaft Femur with Neglected Dislocation of Prosthesis: A Case Report

Introduction:

Neglected hip dislocation is rare in today’s world and after prosthesis replacement even rarer finding. However such patients may not report to surgeons until they develop secondary complications. Management of such patient’s is a challenge to the treating surgeon and need to be tailored suiting to patient’s demands, expectations and constraints of financial resources. We did not find a similar case in the electronic and print media and therefore report this case which was innovatively managed.

Case Report:

A 60 year farmer presented with fracture shaft femur and ipsilateral dislocation prosthesis of right hip. He had a hemiarthroplasty done for fracture neck of femur in the past but used to walk with a lurch since he started to ambulate after discharge. However he was satisfied despite “some problems” which had caused shortening of his limb. The patient was informed of the various treatment options and their possible complications. He expressed his inability to afford a Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) at any stage and consented for other options discussed with him. The patient was positioned supine and adductor tenotomy done. Next he was positioned laterally and the fracture was fixed with heavy duty broad dynamic compression plate and screws. The wound was temporarily closed. Now through the previous scar via posterior approach the hip was exposed. The prosthesis was found to be firmly fixed to the proximal femur. The acetabulum was cleared with fibrous tissue. All attempts the prosthesis to relocate the prosthesis failed after several attempts and it was best decided to leave alone. Post operatively period was uneventful. At follow up he refused for any further manoeuvre in future inform of heavy traction and attempts to reduce the same. At one year when he was walking unaided and his X-rays showed that fracture had well united his SF-36 score was PCS - 49.6 and MCS – 51.9.

Conclusion:

Ipsilateral shaft femur fracture in chronically dislocated prosthesis, done for fracture neck of femur is a rare clinical entity. Increased stress transfers due to dislocation compounded with osteoporosis makes the shaft vulnerable to fracture even with low velocity injury as in our case. Though fixation of fracture shaft femur is clear and straightforward; management of neglected prosthesis dislocation have to be guided by patient’s level of expectations and subjective contentment to adaptation to the altered hip state which influence the overall functional outcome.

Hip abductor defect repair by means of a vastus lateralis muscle shift

Scarring or detachment of the hip abductors, particularly of the gluteus medius, from their insertion may lead to severe abductor weakness, recurrent dislocations, pain, and diminished quality of life. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate whether vastus lateralis shift is associated with satisfactory results and low rate of complications. Eleven adults underwent vastus lateralis shift to bridge a well-documented abductor muscles' insertion defect. Preoperative and postoperative hip functions were assessed applying the Merle d'Aubigne score, British Medical Council scale, and Visual Analog Scale. Significant postoperative improvement was noted in mean Merle d'Aubigne score, gluteus medius muscle force, and quality of life. Vastus lateralis shift represents a viable treatment option for hip abductor deficiency, significantly improving abductor strength and overall quality of life.

Is an algorithmic approach to the treatment of recurrent dislocation after THA effective?

BACKGROUND

The indications for surgical techniques for treatment of recurrent hip dislocation after THA differ, and their rates of achievement of stability may not be similar.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We (1) describe our indications for different approaches for recurrent dislocation, (2) outline an algorithmic approach to the management of recurrently dislocating hips after THA, and (3) determine the overall rate of restoration of stability via this algorithmic approach and for each of four procedures with our indications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 66 patients (69 hips) with revision THA for symptomatic recurrent dislocation from 1993 to 2008. We determined the rate of achievement of stability for the overall patient population and with each revision technique. Minimum followup was 2.8 years (mean, 7.8 years; range, 2.8-12.7 years).

RESULTS

Fifty-one of the 69 hips (74%) had no further dislocations while nine (13%) required two revisions and nine (13%) required three or more revisions. Ultimately, all of the 69 hips (100%) were stable at followup. Use of a large (36-mm-diameter) head, constrained cup, trochanteric advancement, correction of malposition, and a combination of techniques was effective in achieving stability in 67%, 68%, 86%, 91%, and 90% of cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Separating the treatment of patients based primarily on the presence or absence of (1) component malposition, (2) an intact abductor mechanism, and (3) implants accommodating a large-diameter femoral head, we were able to achieve hip stability with one operation in 74% of cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lower rates of dislocation with increased femoral head size after primary total hip replacement

Increased femoral head size may reduce dislocation rates following total hip replacement. The National Joint Registry for England and Wales has highlighted a statistically significant increase in the use of femoral heads ≥ 36 mm in diameter from 5% in 2005 to 26% in 2009, together with an increase in the use of the posterior approach. The aim of this study was to determine whether rates of dislocation have fallen over the same period. National data for England for 247 546 procedures were analysed in order to determine trends in the rate of dislocation at three, six, 12 and 18 months after operation during this time. The 18-month revision rates were also examined.

Between 2005 and 2009 there were significant decreases in cumulative dislocations at three months (1.12% to 0.86%), six months (1.25% to 0.96%) and 12 months (1.42% to 1.11%) (all p < 0.001), and at 18 months (1.56% to 1.31%) for the period 2005 to 2008 (p < 0.001). The 18-month revision rates did not significantly change during the study period (1.26% to 1.39%, odds ratio 1.10 (95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.24), p = 0.118). There was no evidence of changes in the coding of dislocations during this time.

These data have revealed a significant reduction in dislocations associated with the use of large femoral head sizes, with no change in the 18-month revision rate.

Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surface and risk of revision due to dislocation after primary total hip replacement

Dislocation is a common reason for revision following total hip replacement. This study investigated the relationship between the bearing surface and the risk of revision due to dislocation. It was based on 110 239 primary total hip replacements with a diagnosis of osteoarthritis collected by the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry between September 1999 and December 2007. A total of 862 (0.78%) were revised because of dislocation. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces had a lower risk of requiring revision due to dislocation than did metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene surfaces, with a follow-up of up to seven years. However, ceramic-on-ceramic implants were more likely to have larger prosthetic heads and to have been implanted in younger patients. The size of the head of the femoral component and age are known to be independent predictors of dislocation. Therefore, the outcomes were stratified by the size of the head and age. There is a significantly higher rate of revision for dislocation in ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces than in metal-on-polyethylene implants when smaller sizes (< or = 28 mm) of the head were used in younger patients (< 65 years) (hazard ratio = 1.53, p = 0.041) and also with larger (> 28 mm) and in older patients (> or = 65 years) (hazard ratio = 1.73, p = 0.016).

Modular femoral head and liner exchange for the unstable total hip arthroplasty

Outcomes of femoral head and nonconstrained liner exchange in treating hip instability were evaluated. Forty-eight modular component exchanges performed in 45 patients for recurrent hip dislocations were retrospectively reviewed. Mean follow-up was 4.7 years. Overall success rate was 73% (35/48 hips). Thirty-two (67%) of 48 hips experienced no further dislocations. Three patients had 1 dislocation each with no subsequent dislocations. Ten patients (13 hips) had additional surgery to stabilize their hips (27% failure rate). Demographic, clinical, and implant variables were not associated with outcome. Isolated modular component exchange can be successful in treating recurrent hip dislocations; however, a significant failure rate, not easily predicted, exists. This represents the largest series of modular head and nonconstrained liner exchange for hip dislocation (122/125).

Outcome of treatment for dislocation after primary total hip replacement

We have studied the natural history of a first episode of dislocation after primary total hip replacement (THR) to clarify the incidence of recurrent dislocation, the need for subsequent revision and the quality of life of these patients.

Over a six-year period, 99 patients (101 hips) presented with a first dislocation of a primary THR. A total of 61 hips (60.4%) had dislocated more than once. After a minimum follow-up of one year, seven patients had died. Of the remaining 94 hips (92 patients), 47 underwent a revision for instability and one awaits operation (51% in total). Of these, seven re-dislocated and four needed further surgery. The quality of life of the patients was studied using the Oxford Hip Score and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. A control group of patients who had not dislocated was also studied. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1 to 20), the mean Oxford Hip Score was 26.7 (15 to 47) after one episode of dislocation, 27.2 (12 to 45) after recurrent dislocation, 34.5 (12 to 54) after successful revision surgery, 42 (29 to 55) after failed revision surgery and 17.4 (12 to 32) in the control group. The EuroQol-5 dimension questionnaire revealed more health problems in patients undergoing revision surgery.

Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report

BACKGROUND

The stability of total hip replacements has been directly related to the diameter of the femoral head in several studies; however, durability has necessitated the use of femoral heads with a relatively small diameter. Recent developments in metal-on-metal technology have allowed for the use of femoral head bearings that are anatomic in diameter. In this case series, we report on the early results of patients who were at greater risk for dislocation because of anatomic deficiencies or increased range-of-motion activities and underwent hip arthroplasty with implants that had articulating surfaces approaching anatomic dimensions.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients underwent forty total hip arthroplasties with use of a modular metal-on-metal articulation with an anatomic diameter femoral head and a press-fit stem. Thirty patients were active, and four patients were profoundly disabled and had bone or soft-tissue deficiencies that would increase the risk for dislocation. Dislocation precautions were maintained for six weeks, and patients were allowed extreme ranges of motion at three months.

RESULTS

There were no dislocations. Active patients continued in extreme range-of-motion activities. Disabled patients improved but were limited by their comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomic diameter femoral heads offer distinct theoretical advantages in total hip arthroplasty. These short-term results are encouraging, and further study of this new technology in a larger series with a longer follow-up period is warranted.

Resolving inconsistencies in defining the target orientation for the acetabular cup angles in total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Dislocation following total hip arthroplasty is a major complication and malorientation of the acetabular cup is one of the primary factors affecting dislocation. Different conventions used to describe the cup orientation produce significant variations in the recommendations for correct positioning, which in turn make it difficult for clinicians to properly interpret and apply previously reported studies.

METHODS

We examined nine articles presenting recommendations for the range of target orientations of the acetabular cup to minimize the risk of dislocation (referred to as the 'safe zone'). Those studies included five ways to define the cup orientation and two methods to define the reference frame. We converted those recommendations to a single representation based on the radiographic angles expressed in the pelvic frame reference.

FINDINGS

After conversion, the mean recommended anteversion angle was shifted downward by 5 degrees (P<0.01). Also, the target orientation recommendations became more consistent, especially for the anteversion angles where the standard errors of the upper and lower limits were reduced by 61% (P=0.02) and 23% (P=0.04), respectively.

INTERPRETATION

The choice of reference frame and the definition for acetabular cup orientation angles can have a significant effect on the target orientation for the acetabular cup. Recommendations for the target orientation should always explicitly state which reference frame and angle definition is being used. The averaged recommendation of the studies assessed here is 41 degrees inclination and 16 degrees anteversion in radiographic angles or 39 degrees inclination and 21 degrees anteversion in operative angles, both expressed in the pelvic reference frame.

Functional outcomes after nonrecurrent dislocation of primary total hip arthroplasty

The influence of dislocation on functional outcomes of primary total hip arthroplasty is unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of nonrecurrent dislocations treated with closed reduction after primary total hip arthroplasty on postoperative outcome in the short to medium term. Ninety-six patients were enrolled in this retrospective case-control study. There were 32 patients who had a postoperative dislocation. The control group consisted of 64 matched patients who did not dislocate. All patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up. The 2 groups were compared using the SF-12, reduced WOMAC, and satisfaction questionnaire. There was no statistical difference between the 2 groups in subjective functional outcomes using the WOMAC or SF-12. However, there was a trend toward better quality of life scores in the control group, and they were more satisfied with their surgery compared with the dislocation group.

Operative and non-operative treatment options for dislocation of the hip following total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Dislocation following hip replacement is associated with significant morbidity and functional cost. The cause is usually multifactorial. A variety of treatment options are available which can broadly be classified into operative and non-operative.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the best methods of treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The following databases were searched until August 2006: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Health Technology Assessment database (HTA), Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness (DARE), International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Register (ISRCTN), and MetaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing operative and non-operative treatments for recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two independent reviewers applied the inclusion criteria to identified studies.

MAIN RESULTS

Searches identified 269 studies. None fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The authors invite researchers to perform RCTs comparing different treatment options for recurrent dislocation of the hip. The heterogeneity of the population and variety of underlying causes would favour a multi-centre study to achieve an adequate sample size.

Dislocation of the hip after reimplantation for infection: an analysis of risk factors

Dislocation is a well documented complication after a two-stage revision arthroplasty for a deep periprosthetic hip infection. We are aware of no reports specifically evaluating the risk factors for dislocation after reimplantation for infection. We hypothesized greater age, increase in the number of operations on the hip, increase in the length of time from resection to reimplantation, greater limb length discrepancy, smaller femoral offset, and using smaller femoral heads would increase the risk of dislocation. We retrospectively reviewed 34 patients who had a two-stage hip revision for periprosthetic infection with a minimum followup of 2 years. Risk factors for dislocation were evaluated. We compared the rate of dislocation in this group to those patients having revision for aseptic failure. Sixteen dislocations occurred in five (14.7%) of 34 patients. Dislocation occurred in three (1.7%) of 171 patients having revision for aseptic failure. In this small series, age at reimplantation, number of previous operations on the hip, length of time from resection to reimplantation, limb length discrepancy, femoral offset, and femoral head size did not seem to be risk factors for dislocation.

Reliable acetabular cup orientation with a new gravity-assisted guidance system

Acetabular cup orientation is a key factor determining hip stability, and standard mechanical guides have shown little help in improving alignment. An in vitro study was carried out to compare the accuracy and precision of a new gravity-assisted guidance system with a standard mechanical guide. Three hundred ten cups were impacted by 5 surgeons, and the final cup orientation was measured. With the new guide, the average error in anteversion was 0.4 degrees , compared with 10.4 degrees with the standard guide and 0.3 degrees and -4.7 degrees , respectively, for abduction angles. The average time required for orienting the cups was similar for both guides. The accuracy and reproducibility obtained with the new guide were better (P < .0001). These good results would require a clinical validation.

Socket wall addition device in the treatment of recurrent hip prosthesis dislocation: good outcome in 12 patients followed for 4.5 (1-9) years

BACKGROUND

Recurrent dislocation in total hip replacement is difficult to treat and causes severe morbidity.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

12 patients suffering dislocations were reoperated with a socket wall addition device (anti-luxation ring) for the Lubinus SPII prosthesis, and were followed up after a mean of 4.5 (1-9) years with regard to redislocation, function and radiographic loosening.

RESULTS

1 of the patients suffered a redislocation after almost 7 years of use. There was no loosening during the follow-up time. A Harris hip score of 87 (60-100), a health-related quality of life (EQ-5D) index of 0.8 (0.6-1.0) and total range of motion of 145 degrees (125-165) indicate that the patients had a level of function comparable to that of age-matched hip surgery patients with no complications.

INTERPRETATION

The anti-luxation ring shows promising mid-term results and seems to provide an alternative to more extensive revision surgery for selected patients.

Dislocation of bipolar hemiarthroplasty: rate, contributing factors, and outcome

Dislocation of bipolar hemiarthroplasty of the hip is a rare complication. The objectives of our study were to assess the incidence, contributing factors, and outcomes of bipolar prosthesis dislocation. From 1974 to 2001, 1812 primary bipolar hemiarthroplasties were done at our institution. Seventy-four percent were done in patients with fractures of the femoral neck. An anterolateral surgical approach was used in 79% of hips, a posterolateral approach was used in 14% of hips, and a transtrochanteric approach was used in 7% of hips. Thirty-two hips dislocated. The cumulative probabilities of dislocation at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, and 20 years were 1.1% (95% CI range, 0.6%-1.6%), 1.5% (95% CI range, 0.9%-2.1%), 2.1% (95% CI range, 1.2%-3.1%), and 5% (95% CI range, 1.9%-9.6%), respectively. There was no significant association of dislocation with the surgical approach or with the primary operative diagnosis. More than (1/2) of the dislocations occurred within 6 months postoperative. Late dislocations occurred most commonly in patients with Bateman prostheses and osteonecrosis and were associated with inner bearing dissociation. Closed reduction was successful in preventing additional surgery in only 30% of patients. The surgeon must be aware that closed reduction may be unsuccessful, and open reduction with replacement of components may be necessary.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IV (case series). See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component

Malposition of the acetabular component is a risk factor for post-operative dislocation after total hip replacement (THR). We have investigated the influence of the orientation of the acetabular component on the probability of dislocation. Radiological anteversion and abduction of the component of 127 hips which dislocated post-operatively were measured by Einzel-Bild-Röentgen-Analysis and compared with those in a control group of 342 patients. In the control group, the mean value of anteversion was 15 degrees and of abduction 44 degrees. Patients with anterior dislocation after primary THR showed significant differences in the mean angle of anteversion (17 degrees), and abduction (48 degrees) as did patients with posterior dislocation (anteversion 11 degrees, abduction 42 degrees). After revision patients with posterior dislocation showed significant differences in anteversion (12 degrees) and abduction (40 degrees). Our results demonstrate the importance of accurate positioning of the acetabular component in order to reduce the frequency of subsequent dislocations. Radiological anteversion of 15 degrees and abduction of 45 degrees are the lowest at-risk values for dislocation.

Medicolegal aspects of hip and knee arthroplasty

Hip and knee arthroplasties usually are satisfying for the patient and the surgeon; however, these procedures also have considerable risks for generating a medical malpractice lawsuit. Strict adherence to the standard of care and recently implemented patient safety strategies should reduce the surgeon's liability. Expert technical execution of the surgery, timely evidence-based patient treatment, and detailed documentation in the medical record will not only improve the quality of patient care but also will serve as a strong legal defense should the need arise.

Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls

The purpose of this study was to review safety and efficacy of total hip arthroplasty using large-diameter femoral heads in treatment and prevention of dislocation. One hundred forty hips in 135 patients were replaced using femoral heads at least 36 mm in diameter. The average age of the patients was 61.6 years. The patients were grouped into three categories depending on their diagnoses: recurrent dislocations from previous total hip replacements (Group 1; 29 hips); revision surgeries not including revisions for dislocations (Group 2; 54 hips); and primary surgeries (Group 3; 57 hips). The average followup was 5.5 years (range, 1-17 years). A total of 16 hips were revised: six for instability, four for fracture or disassociation of a conventional polyethylene liner, three for aseptic loosening of the socket, and three for sepsis. One hip from Group 1 dislocated at 12.5 years postoperatively, was treated with closed reduction, and since has been nonrecurring. UCLA hip scores all improved significantly. The prevalence of dislocation varied among the three groups, with 13.7% for Group 1, 1.8% for Group 2, and 3.5% for Group 3. The failure in the six cases that required revision for instability was attributable to poor socket orientation. All the hips became stable after revision without the use of a constrained acetabular liner. Large-diameter femoral heads provide additional stability not only for patients with recurrent dislocations, but also for patients having revision. The new, more wear-resistant bearings now enable the surgeon to extend the use of big femoral heads to primary total hip arthroplasty. Metal-on-metal seems to be the material of choice for a bone-conserving reconstruction with large femoral heads.

Efficacy of abduction bracing in the management of total hip arthroplasty dislocation

A retrospective review of total hip arthroplasty (THA) dislocations was performed to determine the effectiveness of abduction bracing following closed reduction. Patients were grouped as a first-time dislocation (n = 91) or recurrent dislocation (n = 58) and whether or not they received an abduction brace; re-dislocation defined failure of treatment. The mean follow-up was 4.0 years in the first-time group and 3.7 years in the recurrent group. Among patients treated for first-time dislocations, 61% re-dislocated with a brace and 64% of nonbraced patients re-dislocated. In the recurrent group, 55% re-dislocated with a brace, whereas 56% re-dislocated without a brace. Chi-square analysis revealed that observed differences were not significant. There was no significant difference among groups with regards to age, sex, operative side, or significant surgical parameters. Abduction bracing following closed reduction of THA dislocation is ineffective in preventing re-dislocation.

Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty

Dislocation is one of the most common complications after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Risk factors include neuromuscular and cognitive disorders, patient non-compliance, and previous hip surgery. Surgical considerations that must be addressed include approach, soft-tissue tension, component positioning, impingement, head size, acetabular liner profile, and surgeon experience. Recent improvements in posterior soft-tissue repair after primary THA have shown a reduced incidence of dislocation. When dislocation occurs, a thorough history, physical examination, and radiographic assessment help in choosing the proper intervention. Closed reduction usually is possible, and nonsurgical management frequently succeeds in preventing recurrence. When these measures fail, first-line revision options should target the underlying etiology. This most often involves tensioning or augmentation of soft tissues, as in capsulorrhaphy or trochanteric advancement; correction of malpositioned components; or improving the head-to-neck ratio. If instability persists, or if a primary THA repeatedly dislocates without a clear cause, a constrained cup or bipolar femoral prosthesis may be as effective as a salvage procedure.

The accuracy of free-hand cup positioning--a CT based measurement of cup placement in 105 total hip arthroplasties

We studied 105 patients who received a total hip arthroplasty between June 1985 and August 2001 using freehand positioning of the acetabular cup. Using pelvic CT scan and the hip-plan module of SurgiGATE-System (Medivision, Oberdorf, Switzerland), we measured the angles of inclination and anteversion of the cup. Mean inclination angle was 45.8 degrees +/-10.1 degrees (range: 23.0-71.5 degrees ) and mean anteversion angle was 27.3 degrees +/-15.0 degrees (range: -23.5 degrees to 59.0 degrees ). We compared the results to the "safe" position as defined by Lewinnek et al. and found that only 27/105 cups were implanted within the limits of the safe position. We conclude that a safe position as defined by Lewinnek et al. [13] was only achieved in a minority of the cups that were implanted freehand.

Advancement of the vastus lateralis muscle for the treatment of hip abductor discontinuity

Impaired abductor function of the hip resulting from a discontinuous gluteus medius often is encountered in revision hip surgery. If the gluteus medius can be reattached to the proximal femur, functional results are satisfactory. If this is not possible, it would be desirable to restore the continuity of the gluteus medius by bridging the defect with local tissue. An anatomic study was performed in 15 cadavers, and proximal advancement of the vastus lateralis without injury to the neurovascular pedicle was 8 cm (range, 7-10 cm). Clinically, the technique was used in 3 patients. At follow-up, both living patients walked without a cane and both were able to hold the leg abducted against moderate pressure. Proximal advancement of the vastus lateralis can successfully bridge defects of the gluteus medius and partially restores abductor function.

Failed closed reduction of hip arthroplasty secondary to prosthetic incarceration in the pelvis

This report describes a patient with dislocation of a unipolar hemiarthroplasty that could not be reduced by closed reduction methods because of perforation of the prosthesis through the ileum.

Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement

BACKGROUND

The lengths of acute hospital stays following total hip replacement have diminished substantially in recent years. As a result, a greater proportion of complications occurs following discharge. Data on the incidence trends of major complications of total hip replacement would facilitate recognition and management of these adverse events.

METHODS

We used Medicare claims data on beneficiaries sixty-five years and older who had had elective, primary total hip replacement for a reason other than a fracture (58,521 patients) or had had revision total hip replacement (12,956 patients) between July 1, 1995, and June 30, 1996. We calculated incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep hip infection per 10,000 person-weeks for four time-periods following the admission for the surgery (during the index hospitalization, from discharge to four weeks postoperatively, from five to thirteen weeks postoperatively, and from fourteen to twenty-six weeks postoperatively). We then used life-table methods to estimate the cumulative incidence of each complication over the first six postoperative months.

RESULTS

Of the patients who had had a primary total hip replacement, 3.9% had a dislocation, 0.9% had a pulmonary embolism, and 0.2% had a deep infection in the first twenty-six postoperative weeks. In the revision total hip replacement cohort, the proportions with dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection were 14.4%, 0.8%, and 1.1%, respectively. The rates of these adverse outcomes were highest during the index hospitalization, diminished considerably in the period from discharge to four weeks postoperatively, and continued to drop in the periods from five to thirteen and fourteen to twenty-six weeks postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection are highest immediately after total hip replacement, but they continue to be elevated throughout the first three postoperative months. With the lengths of hospital stays continuing to diminish, an increasing proportion of complications will occur in outpatients. These findings provide a basis for developing strategies to prevent these complications in the postdischarge management of patients who have had elective total hip replacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic study, Level II-1 (retrospective study). See p. 2 for complete description of levels of evidence.

Early dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: are postoperative restrictions necessary?

We studied prospectively 499 cases of primary total hip arthroplasty done through an anterolateral approach to establish the early dislocation rate when restrictions on postoperative mobilization were not imposed. There were 3 early dislocations (within 6 weeks of surgery). All were reduced closed, and every patient subsequently achieved a stable hip without further intervention. Our results suggest that a low early dislocation rate can be achieved using an anterolateral approach without the need to restrict patients' postoperative mobilization. It may not be appropriate, however, to remove these restrictions when using other surgical approaches to the hip.