Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancer

Real-time detection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in thoracoscopic esophagectomy using artificial intelligence

BACKGROUND

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been largely investigated in the field of surgery, particularly in quality assurance. However, AI-guided navigation during surgery has not yet been put into practice because a sufficient level of performance has not been reached. We aimed to develop deep learning-based AI image processing software to identify the location of the recurrent laryngeal nerve during thoracoscopic esophagectomy and determine whether the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis is reduced using this software.

METHODS

More than 3000 images extracted from 20 thoracoscopic esophagectomy videos and 40 images extracted from 8 thoracoscopic esophagectomy videos were annotated for identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. The Dice coefficient was used to assess the detection performance of the model and that of surgeons (specialized esophageal surgeons and certified general gastrointestinal surgeons). The performance was compared using a test set.

RESULTS

The average Dice coefficient of the AI model was 0.58. This was not significantly different from the Dice coefficient of the group of specialized esophageal surgeons (P = 0.26); however, it was significantly higher than that of the group of certified general gastrointestinal surgeons (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Our software's performance in identification of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was superior to that of general surgeons and almost reached that of specialized surgeons. Our software provides real-time identification and will be useful for thoracoscopic esophagectomy after further developments.

Efficacy of Intraoperative Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Monitoring During Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP), a severe complication of mini-invasive esophagectomy, usually occurs during lymphadenectomy adjacent to recurrent laryngeal nerve. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) in reducing RLNP incidence during mini-invasive esophagectomy. Methods: Systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCO, Web of Knowledge, and Cochrane Library until June 4, 2021 was performed using the terms "(nerve monitoring) OR neuromonitoring OR neural monitoring OR recurrent laryngeal nerve AND (esophagectomy OR esophageal)." Primary outcome was postoperative RLNP incidence. Secondary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for IONM; complications after esophagectomy; number of dissected lymph nodes; operation time; and length of hospital stay. Results: Among 2,330 studies, five studies comprising 509 patients were eligible for final analysis. The RLNP incidence was significantly lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.12-0.88, p < 0.05), the number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes was significantly higher (mean difference 4.30, 95%CI 2.75-5.85, p < 0.001), and the rate of hoarseness was significantly lower (OR 0.14, 95%CI 0.03-0.63, p = 0.01) in the IONM group than in the non-IONM group. The rates of aspiration (OR 0.31, 95%CI 0.06-1.64, p = 0.17), pneumonia (OR 1.08, 95%CI 0.70-1.67, p = 0.71), and operation time (mean difference 7.68, 95%CI -23.60-38.95, p = 0.63) were not significantly different between the two groups. The mean sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for IONM were 53.2% (0-66.7%), 93.7% (54.8-100%), 71.4% (0-100%), and 87.1% (68.0-96.6%), respectively. Conclusion: IONM was a feasible and effective approach to minimize RLNP, improve lymphadenectomy, and reduce hoarseness after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer, although IONM did not provide significant benefit in reducing aspiration, pneumonia, operation time, and length of hospital stay.

The presence of metastatic thoracic duct lymph nodes in Western esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

The thoracic lymphadenectomy during an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer includes resection of the thoracic duct (TD) compartment containing the thoracic duct lymph nodes (TDLN). However, the role of TD compartment resection is still a topic of debate since metastatic TDLNs have only been demonstrated in squamous cell carcinomas in Eastern esophageal cancer patients. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the presence and metastatic involvement of TDLNs in a Western population, in which adenocarcinoma is the predominant type of esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From July 2017 to May 2020 all consecutive patients undergoing an open or robot-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy with concurrent lymphadenectomy and resection of the TD compartment in the University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands and the Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital in Turin, Italy were included. The TD compartment was resected en bloc and was separated in the operation room by the operating surgeon after which it was macro- and microscopically assessed for (metastatic) TDLNs by the pathologist.

RESULTS

A total of 117 patients with an adenocarcinoma (73%) or squamous cell carcinoma (27%) of the esophagus were included. In 61 (52%) patients TDLNs were found, containing metastasis in 9 (15%) patients. No major complications related to TD compartment resection were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to demonstrate the presence of metastatic TDLNs in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus. This result provides a valid argument to routinely extend the thoracic lymphadenectomy with resection of the TD compartment during an esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Combined Intraoperative Identification and Monitoring of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paresis during Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Surgical Technique Using Nerve Integrity Monitoring for Esophageal Carcinoma

Recurrent laryngeal palsy occurs after No. 106 rec RL lymphadenectomy procedure, which is assumed to cause postoperative respiratory complications. A 71-year-old Japanese man with T1b N0 M0 stage 1 esophageal cancer was scheduled for thoracoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymph node dissection using nerve integrity monitoring (NIM). The patient demonstrated an uneventful postoperative course with 56 days remission. Under general anesthesia conditions, a single-lumen intubation tube was inserted for NIM. The automatic periodic stimulation electrode was placed on the bilateral vagus nerves on the left and right, respectively. The NIM had set and enabled the identification of the nerve accurately and continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring using impulses from the stimulation probe. The postoperative outcomes and comparison of the potential amplitudes of electromyography were observed while no postoperative vocal cord paresis was present. Combined intraoperative identification and monitoring of recurrent laryngeal nerve significantly changes the quality of the lymphadenectomy procedure and is a promising optical imaging technique. It has gained recognition for being able to reduce or prevent recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis. It was considered a reasonable method, but it has been superseded by NIM, which is a novel technology.

Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during totally robot-assisted Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

Purpose

The robot-assisted approach for Ivor Lewis esophagectomy offers an enlarged, three-dimensional overview of the intraoperative situs. The vagal nerve (VN) can easily be detected, preserved, and intentionally resected below the separation point of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN). However, postoperative vocal cord paresis can result from vagal or RLN injury during radical lymph node dissection, presenting a challenge to the operating surgeon.

Methods

From May to August 2019, 10 cases of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) with extended 2-field lymphadenectomy, performed at the University Medical Center Mainz, were included in a prospective cohort study. Bilateral intermittent intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) of the RLN and VN was performed, including pre- and postoperative laryngoscopy assessment.

Results

Reliable mean signals of the right VN (2.57 mV/4.50 ms) and the RLN (left 1.24 mV/3.71 ms, right 0.85 mV/3.56 ms) were obtained. IONM facilitated the identification of the exact height of separation of the right RLN from the VN. There were no cases of permanent postoperative vocal paresis. Median lymph node count from the paratracheal stations was 5 lymph nodes.

Conclusion

IONM was feasible during RAMIE. The intraoperative identification of the RLN location contributed to the accuracy of lymph node dissection of the paratracheal lymph node stations. RLN damage and subsequent postoperative vocal cord paresis can potentially be prevented by IONM.

Usefulness of intraoperative nerve monitoring in esophageal cancer surgery in predicting recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy and its severity

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) palsy is a critical postoperative complication in esophageal cancer surgery. However, intraoperative prediction of its occurrence and severity is difficult. In this prospective study, we evaluated the usefulness of intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) in predicting RLN palsy and its severity.

METHODS

Twenty patients who underwent subtotal esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection were enrolled. Intraoperative electromyography (EMG) amplitudes of the vocal cords were measured by IONM at RLN and vagus nerve (VN) stimulation. Comparison was made between the vocal cords with RLN palsy and those without palsy and additionally between the vocal cords with transient RLN palsy and those with persistent palsy.

RESULTS

Among 40 vocal cords in 20 patients, 26 were intact and 14 were paralyzed. Seven had transient, six had permanent palsy. The mean EMG amplitude of intact vocal cords was significantly larger than that of paralyzed ones at VN (506 ± 498 µV vs. 258 ± 226 µV, p = 0.022) and RLN stimulation (642 ± 530 µV vs. 400 ± 308 µV, p = 0.038). The cut-off value for postoperative palsy were 419 µV [positive predictive value (PPV): 48.0%, negative predictive value (NPV): 84.6%] at VN and 673 µV (PPV: 44.8%, NPV: 90.9%) at RLN stimulation. The mean EMG amplitude of persistently paralyzed vocal cords tended to be small, compared with that of recovered ones at both VN (168 ± 173 µV vs. 336 ± 266 µV, p = 0.11) and RLN (244 ± 223 µV vs. 536 ± 344 µV, p = 0.051) stimulation.

CONCLUSION

The absolute EMG amplitude of IONM might be helpful to predict the occurrence and severity of RLN palsy after esophageal surgery although the predictive value is low.

Pathologic lymph node ratio is a predictor of esophageal carcinoma patient survival: a literature-based pooled analysis

The positive lymph node ratio (LNR) has been suggested as a predictor of survival in patients with esophageal carcinoma (EC). However, existed evidences did not completely agree with each other. We sought to examine whether LNR was associated with overall survival (OS). Electronic database was searched for eligible literatures. The primary outcome was the relationship between LNR and OS, which was presented as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using STATA 11.0 software. A total of 18 relevant studies which involved 7,664 cases were included. Patients with an LNR of 0.3 or greater had an increased risk of death compared to those with an LNR of less than 0.3(HR = 2.33; 95% CI 2.03-2.68; P<0.01). Similarly, patients with an LNR greater than 0.5 was also associated with a decreased OS(HR = 1.95; 95% CI 1.52-2.50; P<0.01). No publication bias was found. This meta-analysis confirmed that LNR was a significant predictor of survival in patients with EC and should be considered in prognostication.

Critical care of patients with cancer

Answer questions and earn CME/CNE The increasing prevalence of patients living with cancer in conjunction with the rapid progress in cancer therapy will lead to a growing number of patients with cancer who will require intensive care treatment. Fortunately, the development of more effective oncologic therapies, advances in critical care, and improvements in patient selection have led to an increased survival of critically ill patients with cancer. As a consequence, critical care has become an important cornerstone in the continuum of modern cancer care. Although, in many aspects, critical care for patients with cancer does not differ from intensive care for other seriously ill patients, there are several challenging issues that are unique to this patient population and require special knowledge and skills. The optimal management of critically ill patients with cancer necessitates expertise in oncology, critical care, and palliative medicine. Cancer specialists therefore have to be familiar with key principles of intensive care for critically ill patients with cancer. This review provides an overview of the state-of-the-art in the individualized management of critically ill patients with cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2016;66:496-517. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

What should be the gold standard for the surgical component in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer: transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2014;260:1016-1022. [PMID: 24950288 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000000335]

OBJECTIVE

To analyze survival differences between transthoracic esophagectomy (TTE) and limited transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in clinically (cT3) and pathologically (pT3) staged advanced tumors without neoadjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND

Debate exists whether in the type of resection in locally advanced cancer plays a role in prognosis and whether THE is a valuable alternative to TTE regarding oncological doctrine and overall survival.

METHODS

In a retrospective study of 2 high-volume centers, 468 patients with cT3NXM0 esophageal cancer, including 242 (51.7%) squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) and 226 (48.3%) adenocarcinomas (ACs), were analyzed. A total of 341 (72.9%) TTE and 127 (27.1%) THE were performed. We used the propensity score matching to build comparable groups. Primary endpoint was the overall survival; secondary endpoints included resection status and lymph node yield.

RESULTS

TTE achieved a higher rate of R0 resections (86.2% vs 73.2%; P = 0.001) and a higher median lymph node yield (27.0 ± 12.4 vs 17.0 ± 6.4; P < 0.001) than THE. Thirty-day mortality rate was 6.6% (8/121) for TTE and 7.4% (9/121) for THE (P = 0.600). In the matched groups, TTE was beneficial for pT3 SCC (P = 0.004), pT3 AC (P = 0.029), cT3 SCC (P = 0.018), and cT3 AC (P = 0.028) patients. TTE was either beneficial in pN2 disease for cT3 AC + SCC or pT3 SCC but not for pT3 AC patients, without nodal stratification in pT3 and cT3 SCC node-positive patients. On multivariable analysis, TTE remained an independent factor for survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Extended TTE achieved a higher rate of R0 resections, a higher lymph node yield, and resulted in a prolonged survival than THE in pT3, cT3, and node-positive patients.

Intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring: a useful method for patients with esophageal cancer

It is well accepted that recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis is a severe complication of esophagectomy or lymphadenectomy performed adjacent to the recurrent laryngeal nerves. Herein, determination of the effectiveness of implementing continuous recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring to reduce the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy was sought. A total of 115 patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer were enrolled in the thoracic section of the Tangdu Hospital of the Fourth Military Medical University from April 2008 to April 2009. Clinical parameters of patients, the morbidity, and the mortality following esophageal resection were recorded and compared. After the surgery, a 2-year follow up was completed. It was found that recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and postoperative pneumonia were more frequently diagnosed in the patients that did not receive continuous recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring (6/61 vs. 0/54). Furthermore, positive mediastinal lymph nodes (P = 0.015), total mediastinal lymph nodes (P < 0.001), positive total lymph nodes (P = 0.027), and total lymph nodes (P < 0.001) were more often surgically removed in the patients with continuous recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring. These patients also had a higher 2-year survival rate (P = 0.038) after surgery. It was concluded that continuous intraoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring is technically safe and effectively identifies the recurrent laryngeal nerves. This may be a helpful method for decreasing the incidence of recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis and postoperative pneumonia, and for improving the efficiency of lymphadenectomy.

Prognostic impact of lymph node involvement and the extent of lymphadenectomy (LAD) in adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG)

BACKGROUND

The prognostic importance of lymph node (LN) involvement for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) is well-known. In the latest edition of the UICC staging system, the number of metastatic LNs was taken into account, while the extent of lymphadenectomy (LAD) remains unaddressed. Removal of at least six LNs is recommended, but there is no defined minimum number as to classify as (y)pN0. We examined the prognostic value of the number of positive LNs, number of LNs removed, and LN ratio (LNR) in order to determine the influence of an adequate LAD on overall survival (OS).

METHODS

We analyzed data of 316 patients with AEG treated in our institution (2001-2011) regarding clinicopathological data, treatment, morbidity, mortality, and long-term prognosis. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed using Cox regression to evaluate the prognostic impact of(y)pN category, number of LNs removed and LNR.

RESULTS

OS decreased with higher count of positive LNs (p < 0.001) and higher LNR (p < 0.001). Whether >6, >15, or >30 LNs were removed did not influence OS, neither in the entire study population nor within individual (y)pT or (y)pN categories. Multivariate analysis revealed LNR (p < 0.001) besides M category (p = 0.015) and tracheotomy during the postoperative course (p = 0.005) as independent predictors of OS.

CONCLUSION

The classification according to the number of involved LNs in the latest edition of the UICC staging system improves prognostication in patients with AEG. The importance of an adequate LAD is shown by the high prognostic relevance of the LNR rather than the absolute number of LNs removed.

Effect of postoperative course on midterm outcome after esophageal resection for cancer

Esophageal resections are challenging procedures often associated with postoperative complications and a prolonged hospital stay. This study investigated the impact of postoperative course on midterm survival in 35 patients undergoing esophageal resection for malignancy between January 2002 and November 2007. The impact of preoperative and operative variables, pathology, staging, early postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay on midterm survival was determined with Cox regression analysis. During the follow-up period, 17 (48.6%) patients died. Multivariate analysis identified surgical stage and length of stay as independent predictors of midterm survival; in addition, the total number of complications reached statistical significance. In conclusion, in addition to surgical stage, postoperative course has an impact upon midterm survival after esophageal resection.

The positive lymph node ratio predicts long-term survival in patients with operable thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in China

BACKGROUND

Controversy exists concerning the optimal cutoff points for the positive lymph node ratio (PLNR) to predict overall survival. We aim to propose reasonable PLNR categories for the discrimination of the survival difference between groups.

METHODS

We used data from two centers to establish a training (n = 1006) and a validation (n = 783) cohort. All of the patients underwent curative surgical treatment. Martingale residuals from a Cox proportional hazards regression model were used to determine the optimal cutoff points for PLNR to predict overall survival. The survival rate was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and a log-rank test was used to assess the survival differences between groups. The results obtained from the training cohort were tested with the validation cohort at each step.

RESULTS

We classified the patients into four revised nodal categories: R-pN0 (PLNR = 0), R-pN1 (0< PLNR ≤0.1), R-pN2 (0.1< PLNR ≤0.3), and R-pN3 (PLNR >0.3). Subgroup analysis for the pT2 and pT3 cases showed that the survival differences could be well discriminated between groups based on PLNR in both the training cohort and validation cohort. When we modified the current staging system using revised nodal categories (based on PLNR) instead of the AJCC nodal categories, the survival rate could also be easily distinguished between patients in different stages in both cohorts of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The survival rate of ESCC can be discriminated between four groups: PLNR = 0, 0< PLNR ≤0.1, 0.1< PLNR ≤0.3, and PLNR >0.3. Further studies are required to confirm these results.

Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for the treatment of esophagogastric cancer: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To study the differences in short and long-term outcomes of transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer.

BACKGROUND

Studies have compared transthoracic with transhiatal esophagectomy with varying results. Previous systematic reviews (1999, 2001) do not include the latest randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

Systematic review of English-language studies comparing transthoracic with transhiatal esophagectomy up to January 31, 2010. Meta-analysis was used to summate the study outcomes. Methodological and surgical quality of included studies was assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-two studies, comprising 5905 patients (3389 transthoracic and 2516 transhiatal) were included in the analysis. No study met all minimum surgical quality standards. Transthoracic operations took longer and were associated with a significantly longer length of stay. There was no difference in blood loss. The transthoracic group had significantly more respiratory complications, wound infections, and early postoperative mortality, whereas anastomotic leak, anastomotic stricture, and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy rate was significantly higher in the transhiatal group. Lymph node retrieval was reported in 4 studies and was significantly greater in the transthoracic group by on average 8 lymph nodes. Analysis of 5-year survival showed no significant difference between the groups and was subject to significant heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis of studies comparing transthoracic with transhiatal esophagectomy for cancer demonstrates no difference in 5-year survival, however lymphadenectomy and reported surgical quality was suboptimal in both groups and the transthoracic group had significantly more advanced cancer. The finding of equivalent survival should therefore be viewed with caution.

Perioperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) for locally advanced esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma: a multicenter phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Although perioperative chemotherapy for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (ADC) improves survival, the overall poor prognosis suggests that further refinement of treatment is required. Docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) is effective for metastatic ADC of the upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract; we thus sought to investigate the efficacy of this regimen in patients with resectable disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable ADC of the upper GI tract received DCF [docetaxel (Taxotere) 75 mg/m(2) I.V. day 1, cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) I.V. day 1, 5-FU 750 mg/m(2) continuous infusion for 120 h, every 3 weeks] for three cycles before and after resection. Primary end point was complete resection; secondary end points were response, toxicity, surgical morbidity, and overall survival.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients with ADC of the esophagus (11), gastroesophageal junction (25), or stomach (7) started treatment and 86% completed all preoperative cycles with grade 3-4 toxicity arising in 47%. Metabolic response to chemotherapy (reduction in maximal standard uptake value >35%) was achieved in 25/33 (76%) patients. Surgery was carried out in 41/43 and complete resection was achieved in all 41 patients with pathologic complete response in 4/41. Postoperative chemotherapy was started in 29 patients and completed in 24. Three-year overall survival was 60%.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative DCF is a tolerable and highly effective regimen for the treatment of esophagogastric ADC.

Systematic review of the impact of volume of oesophagectomy on patient outcome

PURPOSE

This systematic review aims to assess whether overall survival, mortality, morbidity, length of stay and cost of performing oesophagectomy are related to surgical volume.

METHODS

A systematic search strategy from 1997 until December 2006 was used to retrieve relevant studies. Inclusion of articles was established through application of a predetermined protocol, independent assessment by two reviewers and a final consensus decision.

RESULTS

A total of 55 studies were identified of which 27 studies, representing 68 882 patients, met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one of these solely examined hospital volume, 5 examined both hospital and surgeon volume, and 1 examined surgeon volume in isolation. All but one of the studies were retrospective in nature, and because of the heterogeneity of the literature, no meta-analysis could be performed. Of the studies exploring the relationship between hospital volume and mortality, 20 reported a statistically significant benefit to large volume centres. Five of six included studies showed significant evidence for a reduced mortality risk with greater surgeon volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evidence from these retrospective studies, oesophagectomy performed in high volume centres would appear to be associated with better outcome compared with low volume centres.

Endoscopic versus surgical therapy for early cancer in Barrett's esophagus: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy for early esophageal adenocarcinoma is associated with increased operative mortality and morbidity, but possibly a decreased recurrence rate compared with endoscopic therapy when using EMR and radiofrequency ablation.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of esophagectomy and endoscopic therapy in the treatment of early esophageal adenocarcinoma.

DESIGN

Decision analysis model.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.

RESULTS

During the 5-year study period, endoscopic therapy cost $17,000.00 and yielded 4.88 quality-adjusted life years, compared with $28,000.00 and 4.59, respectively, for esophagectomy. Varying the recurrence rates of cancer or Barrett's esophagus metaplasia after endoscopic therapy did not change the overall outcome. The sensitivity analysis demonstrated, however, that the outcome depended on the rate of lymph node involvement and operative mortality. Under the best of circumstances in favor of esophagectomy, such as 2% operative mortality, no reduced quality of life after esophagectomy, and a low 5-year survival rate after recurrence of endoscopic ablation, the risk of positive lymph nodes still needed to exceed 25% before esophagectomy became the preferred treatment option. This threshold is twice as high as the values reported for early submucosal cancer invasion.

LIMITATIONS

Limited data are available about the long-term outcome of EMR and radiofrequency ablation.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopic therapy for early Barrett's esophagus adenocarcinoma is more effective and less expensive than esophagectomy. Even in early esophageal adenocarcinoma with submucosal invasion, endoscopic therapy is a cost-effective alternative to esophagectomy, especially in patients with a high operative risk.

Lymph node ratio after curative surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) is rare but its incidence is rising worldwide. The value of lymph node dissection for ICC is under discussion; the current staging systems do not differentiate between numbers of involved nodes.

METHODS

Ninety-three patients who underwent laparotomy for ICC between 1997 and 2007 were identified retrospectively; 46 who underwent curative resection and systematic lymphadenectomy around the hepatoduodenal ligament were analysed further. Univariable and multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Tumour size and advanced tumour stage were associated with worse overall and recurrence-free survival in univariable analysis. An increased ratio of positive to total harvested lymph nodes (LNR) was also prognostic for adverse outcome in lymph node-positive patients: crude hazard ratio 8.93 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.52 to 32.50) for overall survival and 8.76 (1.96 to 39.22) for recurrence-free survival. Adjusted hazard ratios for LNR in multivariable regression analysis were 9.81 (1.52 to 43.44) and 10.63 (2.04 to 55.31) respectively. The total number of retrieved lymph nodes was not related to survival or recurrence.

CONCLUSION

LNR appears to be a good prognostic factor for survival or recurrence after curative resection for ICC.

Impact of the number of resected and involved lymph nodes on esophageal cancer survival

BACKGROUND

Using a large data set, we investigated the impact of the number of resected and involved lymph nodes on overall survival for patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

From the National Oncology Database, esophageal cancer cases with data available on the total number of resected and involved nodes as well as other variables were evaluated as it relates to overall survival by multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards method. Patients with 0, exactly 1 or 1-3 positive nodes were separately studied to determine the association between the number of lymph nodes resected and overall survival.

RESULTS

From 1969 to 2002, 3,144 (17%) of 18,390 esophageal cancer cases with complete data were identified. Increasing number of involved nodes predicted poorer outcome (P < 10(-6)). Results from studying patients with 0, exactly 1 or 1-3 positive nodes showed that survival improved with increasing number of nodes analyzed up to 12. Three-tier nodal grouping with increasing risk of death were identified, 0, 1-3, and >or=4 positive nodes (P < 10(-5)).

CONCLUSIONS

The pathological assessment of minimal 12 lymph nodes provides sufficient prognostic information. Three-tier nodal grouping is suggested for the next version of AJCC staging system for esophageal cancer.

Patients with cancer on the ICU: the times they are changing

A recent paper by Taccone and coworkers showed that 15% of patients from 198 European intensive care units (ICUs) had a malignancy, mostly solid tumors but also hematological malignancies. Over the past years, the prognosis of cancer patients has improved significantly, even when ICU admission is necessary. Refusal of ICU admission should not be based on a diagnosis of cancer as the underlying condition. In contrast, these decisions should be based on the availability of treatment options, and on patients' own preferences.

Reflux esophagitis, high-grade neoplasia, and early Barrett's carcinoma-what is the place of the Merendino procedure?

INTRODUCTION

Because of the increasing frequency of Barrett's cancer in Western industrialized countries, the management of reflux disease with the potential development of Barrett's esophagus, neoplasia, and early carcinoma is very important. In case of established Barrett's esophagus, the malignant degeneration of the specialized epithelium cannot definitely be prevented by antireflux surgery or continuous medication. Mucosal adenocarcinomas nearly never develop lymph node metastasis and can mostly be treated by endoscopic mucosectomy. The deeper the submucosa is infiltrated, the higher is the rate of lymph node metastasis which is, on the average, 30% for submucosal carcinoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, radical subtotal esophagectomy is the treatment of choice for submucosal carcinoma, whereas distal esophageal resection with limited lymph node dissection is only indicated in mucosal carcinoma which cannot be completely removed by interventional endoscopy.

Transhiatal esophagectomy in a high volume institution

Background

The optimal operative approach for carcinoma at the lower esophagus and esophagogastric junction remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess a single unit experience of transhiatal esophagectomy in an era when the use of systemic oncological therapies has increased dramatically.

Study Design

Between January 2000 and November 2006, 215 consecutive patients (182 males, 33 females, median age = 65 years) underwent transhiatal esophagectomy; invasive malignancy was detected preoperatively in 188 patients. 90 patients (42%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Prospective data was obtained for these patients and cross-referenced with cancer registry survival data.

Results

There were 2 in-hospital deaths (0.9%). Major complications included: respiratory complications in 65 patients (30%), cardiovascular complications in 31 patients (14%) and clinically apparent anastomotic leak in 12 patients (6%). Median length of hospital stay was 14 days. The radicality of resection was inversely related to T stage: an R0 resection was achieved in 98–100% of T0/1 tumors and only 14% of T4 tumors. With a median follow up of 26 months, one and five year survival rates were estimated at 81% and 48% respectively.

Conclusion

Transhiatal esophagectomy is an effective operative approach for tumors of the infracarinal esophagus and the esophagogastric junction. It is associated with low mortality and morbidity and a five survival rate of nearly 50% when combined with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Patient preferences for the disclosure of prognosis after esophagectomy for cancer with curative intent

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to determine the preferences for content, style, and format of prognostic information of patients after potentially curative esophagectomy for cancer and to explore predictors of these preferences.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter study included a consecutive series of patients who underwent surgical resection for cancer in the past 2 years and who did not have evidence of cancer recurrence. A questionnaire was used to elicit patient preferences for the content, style, and format of prognostic information. Sociodemographic characteristics, clinicopathological factors, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-30 and OES18) were explored as predictors for certain preferences.

RESULTS

Of the 204 eligible patients, 176 patients (86%) returned the questionnaire. The majority of patients desired prognostic information. Information preferences declined when information became more specific and more negative. Married patients and higher-educated patients were more likely to want all prognostic information. The majority of patients wanted their specialist to start the discussion about prognosis. However, a significant proportion of these patients wanted their specialist to first ask if they want to have prognostic information. The percentage of patients wanted a realistic and individualistic approach was 97%. Words and numbers were preferred over visual presentations.

CONCLUSION

After potentially curative esophagectomy for cancer, the majority of patients want detailed prognostic information and want their specialist to begin the prognostic discussion. Patients prefer their doctor to be realistic; words and numbers are preferred over figures and graphs.

En bloc esophagectomy reduces local recurrence and improves survival compared with transhiatal resection after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant therapy is commonly used for esophageal adenocarcinoma. We have reported reduced local recurrence rates and improved survival after an en bloc esophagectomy compared with a transhiatal resection as primary therapy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. The aim of this study was to determine whether the benefits of an en bloc resection would extend to patients after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

The charts of all patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma that had neoadjuvant therapy and en bloc or transhiatal esophagectomy from 1992-2005 were reviewed. Patients found to have systemic metastatic disease at the time of the operation or who had an incomplete resection were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 58 patients: 40 had an en bloc resection and 18 had a transhiatal esophagectomy. A complete pathologic response occurred in 17 (29.3%) of 58 patients. Median follow-up was 34.1 months after en bloc resection and 18.3 months after transhiatal resection (P = .18). Overall survival at 5 years and survival in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy was significantly better with an en bloc resection (overall survival: 51% for en bloc resection and 22% for transhiatal resection [P = .04]; survival with residual disease: 48% for en bloc resection and 9% for transhiatal resection [P = .02]). Survival in patients with complete pathologic response tended to be better after an en bloc resection (en bloc, 70%; transhiatal, 43%; P = .3).

CONCLUSION

An en bloc resection provides a survival advantage to patients after neoadjuvant therapy compared with a transhiatal resection, particularly for those with residual disease. Similar to patients treated with primary resection, an en bloc esophagectomy is the procedure of choice after neoadjuvant therapy.

Prognostic significance of the number of lymph node metastases in esophageal cancer. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;206:239-246. [PMID: 18222375 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.09.003]

BACKGROUND

Regional lymph node (LN) involvement is one of the most important predictors of survival for patients with esophageal cancer. The current staging classification differentiates only between the presence and absence of LN metastasis. In this study, we examined whether involvement of a higher number of LNs is associated with worse survival among esophageal cancer patients.

STUDY DESIGN

We identified all patients who underwent operations for node-positive esophageal cancer between 1988 and 2003 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry. Because the number of positive LNs is confounded by the total number of LNs removed, patients were classified into three groups by the ratio of positive-to-total number of LNs removed (LN ratio [LNR]): <or= 0.2, 0.21 to 0.5, and>0.5. Esophageal cancer-specific survival was compared among these groups using Kaplan-Meier curves. Stratified and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the relationship between the LNR and survival after adjusting for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The study cohort included 838 esophageal cancer patients. Disease-specific survival rates decreased with higher LNR. Five-year disease-specific survival was 30% among patients with an LNR<or=0.2, compared with 16% and 13% for those with LNs of 0.21 to 0.5 and>0.5, respectively (p < 0.001). In stratified and multivariable analyses controlling for age, race, gender, histology, tumor-status, and postoperative radiotherapy, a higher LNR was independently associated with worse disease-specific survival.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that a higher LNR among patients with node-positive esophageal cancer is associated with worse survival. If validated, this prognostic criterion may be included in staging classifications.

Clinical impact of lymphadenectomy extent in resectable esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer (EC) frequently presents with advanced stages and is associated with high recurrence rates after esophagectomy. The value of an extended lymph node dissection (ELND) remains unclear in this setting. An EC data set was created from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results 1973-2003 database. Relationships between the number of lymph nodes (LNs) examined and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. From a cohort of 40,129 EC patients, 5,620 individuals were selected. The median age was 65 (range: 11-102), and 75% were men. The median tumor size was 5.0 cm (0.1-30). On multivariate analysis, total LN count (or negative LN count, respectively) was an independent prognostic variable, aside from age, race, resection status, radiation, T category, N category (all at p < 0.0001), and M category (p = 0.0003). Higher total LN count (>30) and negative LN count (>15) categories were associated with best OS and lowest 90-day mortality (p < 0.0001). The numeric LN effect on OS was independent from nodal status or histology. Greater total and negative LN counts are associated with longer EC survival. Although the mechanism remains uncertain, it does not appear to be limited to stage migration. ELND during potentially curative esophagectomy for EC can be supported by the data.

An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate prognostic factors and tumor staging in patients after esophagectomy for cancer.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Several reports have questioned the appropriateness of the sixth edition of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM guidelines for staging esophageal cancer. Additional pathologic characteristics, besides the 3 basic facets of anatomic spread (tumor, node, metastases), might also have prognostic value.

METHODS

All patients who underwent resection of the esophagus for carcinoma between January 1995 and March 2003 were extracted from a prospective database. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify prognostic factors for survival. The goodness of fit and accuracy of 3 staging models (UICC-TNM, Korst classification, Rice classification) predicting survival were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 292 patients (mean age, 63 years) underwent esophagectomy. The 5-year overall survival rate was 29% (median, 21 months). pT-, pN-, pm-stage, and radicality of the resection were independent prognostic factors. Subdivision of T1 tumors into mucosal and submucosal showed significant differences in 5-year survival between both groups: 90% versus 47%, respectively (P = 0.01). Subdivision of pN-stage into 3 groups based on the number of positive nodes (0, 1-2, and >3 nodes positive) or the lymph node ratio (0, 0.01-0.2, and >0.2) also refined staging (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The current subclassification of M1 (M1a and M1b) is not warranted (P = 0.41). The staging model of Rice was more accurate than the UICC-TNM classification in predicting survival.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the view that the current (6th edition) UICC-TNM staging model for esophageal cancer needs to be revised.

Appraisal of a revised lymph node classification system for esophageal squamous cell cancer

BACKGROUND

Node-positive patients with esophageal carcinoma constitute a heterogeneous population with a variable prognosis, which the current staging system insufficiently addresses. To that end, 863 patients with a curative resection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma were analyzed to evaluate a useful and simple nodal classification system.

METHODS

Along with standard conventional clinicopathologic factors, data for metastatic lymph node (MLN) number, metastatic to examined LN ratio (MLN ratio), and MLN size were evaluated. The greatest microscopic dimension of the metastatic tumor inside the largest MLN (MLN size) was measured on histopathologic slides. Patients with MLNs were classified into n1 (< 9 mm) and n2 (> or = 9 mm) groups, according to size of MLNs (n-stage).

RESULTS

The paratracheal LNs most frequently contained the largest MLN and among them the right recurrent laryngeal LNs were the most common site (81.8%). Patients were stratified into significant groups by all the nodal criteria. In multivariable analysis, MLN size n-stage and MLN ratio N-stage were the best independent predictors for disease-free and overall survival, respectively. In the disease-free survival, MLN ratio N-stage subcategories were divided into prognostic groups according to the n-stage. A combined nodal staging strategy combining the n-stage and N-stage had the strongest prognostic value and was used for the tumor-node-metastasis classification with distinct separation of patients into prognostic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this study indicate that the MLN size may serve as an accurate metric to classify node-positive patients and a combination of the MLN ratio and size may have synergism in classifying node-positive patients into prognostically homogenous groups.

Staging of esophageal carcinoma: length of tumor and number of involved regional lymph nodes. Are these independent prognostic factors?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

New potential prognostic indicators aside from the TNM classification have been proposed. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic relevance of tumor length as well as number of involved regional lymph nodes (LNM) in patients with esophageal carcinoma.

METHODS

Two hundred thirteen patients with esophageal carcinoma (116 squamous cell- and 97 adenocarcinoma) were included in this study. Treatment of choice was subtotal en bloc esophagectomy including "2-field" lymphadenectomy. The median number of examined lymph nodes (LNs) was 28. Eighty patients (38%) received preoperative radio-chemotherapy according to a standardized protocol. Histopathology consisted of tumor stage, residual tumor, grading, and number of examined and involved LN. Univariate and multivariate prognostic values were calculated.

RESULTS

Length of tumor correlated with pT/ypT-category (P<0.01). Univariate but not multivariate analysis showed better survival for tumors<or=3 cm (P<0.05). Patients with 1-5 LNM had significantly better prognoses than those with more than 5 LNM (Hazard ratio 2.7, 95% CI=1.7-4.2) (P<0.01). Patients without LNM and more than 15 examined LN showed significantly better prognosis than those with fewer examined LN (Hazard ratio=0.3, 95% CI=0.1-0.6) (P<0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

A revision of the TNM classification for esophageal carcinoma should subdivide the pN1-category according to the number of LNM.

Prognostic factors in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

The incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is rising rapidly in Western Europe and North America. It is an aggressive disease with early lymphatic and hematogenous dissemination. TNM cancer staging systems predict survival on the basis of the anatomic extent of the tumor. However, the adequacy of the current TNM staging system for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) is questioned repeatedly. Numerous prognostic factors have been described, but are not included in the TNM system. This review describes clinical parameters, aspects of operative technique, response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy therapy, complications and established pathologic determinants found in the resection specimen that have a prognostic impact. Furthermore, their potential application in the clinical setting in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or GEJ is discussed. Future directions to improve staging systems are given.

Reconstruction of recurrent laryngeal nerve with involvement by metastatic node in esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis represents one of the major complications in esophageal cancer surgery, and patients with esophageal cancer sometimes develop recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis before treatment. We evaluated recurrent laryngeal nerve reconstruction in patients with lymph node metastasis infiltrating the recurrent laryngeal nerve.

METHODS

Five patients with preoperative recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis as a result of involvement of metastasis were enrolled in the present study. Ansa cervicalis-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis in the neck was performed in 4 patients and direct anastomosis of recurrent laryngeal nerve in the mediastinum in 1 patient.

RESULTS

Six months after surgery, 3 patients who had undergone ansa cervicalis-recurrent laryngeal nerve anastomosis in the neck displayed good quality of life without hoarseness or aspiration. The patient who underwent direct anastomosis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the mediastinum experienced occasional aspiration and hoarseness. The remaining patient displayed poor condition because of recurrent lung tumor, and quality of life was decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

If patients with recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis before treatment can undergo potentially curative resection with lymph node dissection, including the metastatic lymph node infiltrating the recurrent laryngeal nerve, recurrent laryngeal nerve reconstruction should be performed to improve quality of life.

Extracapsular lymph node involvement in node-positive patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction

In adenocarcinoma of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction, little attention has been paid to the biologic significance of extracapsular lymph node involvement (LNI). In the present study, a consecutive series of 251 patients with lymph node dissemination were reviewed. All patients underwent esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma and were prospectively followed. A total of 1562 positive lymph nodes were reexamined. Extracapsular LNI was identified in 456 lymph nodes (29%) in 166 patients (66%). Extracapsular LNI was confined to one lymph node in 63 patients (38%). The occurrence of extracapsular LNI increased significantly with the depth of invasion, presence of positive resectable truncal nodes, number of resected nodes, number of positive nodes, and lymph node ratio. The median potential follow-up period was 58 months (range, 12-143 months). In this period, 178 patients died of recurrent disease. The pattern of recurrence was comparable between patients with and without extracapsular LNI (P = 0.938). The median survival in patients with extracapsular LNI was 15 months (95% confidence interval, 12-18 months) compared with 41 months (95% confidence interval, 19-64 months) in those without extracapsular LNI (P < 0.001). Median survival of patients with 2 or more lymph nodes was 12 months (95% confidence interval, 8-15 months). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that T-stage, extracapsular LNI, and lymph node ratio were independent prognostic factors. The presence of extracapsular LNI identifies a subgroup with a significantly worse long-term survival. Together with the T-stage and the lymph node ratio, extracapsular LNI reflects a particularly aggressive biologic behavior and has significant prognostic potential.

The Influence of Technical Complications on Postoperative Outcome and Survival After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The dismal survival associated with esophagectomy for cancer has led to the search for potentially correctable factors responsible for this poor prognosis. Although it is intuitive that technical complications could increase postoperative mortality, the effect on long-term survival is controversial.

METHODS

From 1990 to 2002, 434 patients underwent resection for squamous cell carcinoma of the intrathoracic esophagus. Prospectively collected data were reviewed for the presence of technical complications. Patient, tumor, and operative variables, postoperative outcome, and survival were compared between patients with technical complications and those without. Prognostic factors were assessed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Technical complications occurred in 98 (22.6%) patients. Patients with technical complications had a higher prevalence of cardiac disease, more proximal tumors, and more cervical anastomoses. Technical complications were associated with an increased rate of pulmonary complications (37.8% vs. 10.7%; P<.001) and increased hospital mortality (9.2% vs. 3.3%; P=.025), but no difference in 30-day mortality (2% vs. 1.2%; P=.6). Poor-prognostic factors for survival included male sex, stage III/IV disease, cirrhosis, proximal tumors, and R1/R2 resection, but not technical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Although immediate postoperative outcome and hospital mortality rates were increased, no effect on long-term survival was seen in patients with complications related to errors in surgical technique.

Validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy esophageal cancer subscale

BACKGROUND

To develop and validate a quality of life subscale for patients with esophageal cancer to be used with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of patients with esophageal cancer treated with surgery alone or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery evaluating the validity, internal consistency, and responsiveness to change of the FACT-Esophageal (FACT-E) when comparing it with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ 30) and esophageal (OES 24) as well as clinical factors.

RESULTS

The FACT-E demonstrated very good convergent and divergent validity when compared with the EORTC QLQ30 and OES 24 and clinical variables. Internal consistency was also good with coefficient alpha > 0.70 for all subscales and individual items. Stability coefficients were > 0.80. Changes in clinical status were reflected in changes in FACT-E scores demonstrating responsiveness to change, particularly in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy before surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The FACT-E met or exceeded all standards for validity, providing an option to measure health-related quality of life for different treatment strategies for esophageal cancer.

Transhiatal Esophagectomy

Controversy still remains regarding the appropriateness of THE asa cancer operation. Critics argue that without an en bloc mediastinal lymphadenectomy, THE does not provide accurate staging or the potential for a curative procedure; however, operative margins are similar after transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy, and van Sandick and co-workers reported that 73% of margins were microscopically negative. In many cases, esophageal carcinoma appears to be a systemic disease at the time of diagnosis. According to Orringer and colleagues, 46% of patients have Stage III or IV disease at the time of operation, and Altorki and co-authors found that 35% of patients thought to be potentially curable were found to have occult cervical lymph node disease after three-field lymph node dissection. In addition, survival after THE is similar to that reported after transthoracic esophagectomy as well as radical esophagectomy with mediastinal lymphadenectomy. The most important determinants of survival appear to be the biologic behavior of the tumor and the stage at the time of resection rather than the operative approach, and esophageal carcinoma will likely require systemic therapy for a cure. Transhiatal esophagectomy has been used increasingly in the resection of benign and malignant disease, and has several potential advantages over transthoracic esophagectomy, including significantly decreased respiratory complications and mediastinitis due to the avoidance of thoracotomy and intrathoracic anastomosis. In a meta-analysis of fifty studies comparing transthoracic and transhiatal resection, Hulscher et al found significantly higher early morbidity and mortality rates after transthoracic resections, which was confirmed in a later randomized study of 220 patients(Table 2). Survival after THE is also equivalent to or better than that seen after transthoracic esophagectomy, and transhiatal esophagectomy should be considered in all patients requiring esophagectomy for benign or malignant disease.

Useful benchmarks to evaluate outcomes after esophagectomy and pancreaticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

Multiple publications have suggested that outcomes after complex operations are better at high-volume centers. However, of all the potential "outcomes" to measure, only mortality has been studied extensively. The broadest difference in mortality between low- and high-volume centers has been measured after esophagectomy (EG) and pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). If a low-volume center recorded high mortality, then a broader set of outcomes beyond mortality would be useful for self-assessment.

METHODS

Two single-surgeon prospective databases for outcomes of EG and PD were reviewed in a multispecialty clinic within a tertiary-referral, resident-training hospital. Between January 1996 and December 2002, 174 consecutive patients underwent EG performed by 1 surgeon (25 cases/y), and 232 consecutive patients underwent PD performed by another surgeon (34 cases/y). We measured hospital and 30-day mortality rate, mean operation time (OR time), mean estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL), mean length of stay (LOS), and the anastomotic leak rate. These outcomes were compared with those of recently published cases for EG and PD.

RESULTS

Mortality for both operations was zero. After EG, OR time was 394 minutes (literature = 336), EBL was 204 mL (literature = 964), transfusion rate was 3.5% (literature = 34%), LOS was 11.1 days (literature = 16.6), leak was 2.9% (literature = 9.1%), and reoperation was 1.7% (literature = not stated). After PD, OR time was 450 minutes (literature = 431), EBL was 382 mL (literature = 1,183), transfusion rate was 7.3% (literature = not stated), LOS was 11.2 days (literature = 17.8), leak was 6.5% (literature = 9.9%), and reoperation was 0.4% (literature = 3.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

These 2 single-surgeon series provide benchmarks to help better define acceptable outcomes after EG and PD. This assessment demonstrated lower mortality and LOS in a high-volume surgical practice. These outcomes are not associated with OR time but with lower EBL, less need for transfusion, and lower need for reoperation. Anastomotic leaks occurred in both series; however, this was not associated with mortality because of early recognition and the use of nonsurgical minimally invasive techniques. If mortality is high at a low-volume center, then the additional benchmarks of this study, in addition to mortality and LOS, could be used to lower mortality through self-assessment by identifying specific outcomes that need improvement.

Extended surgery for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

The overall prognosis of patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) remains poor mainly because of the advanced stage of the disease at the time of presentation. As a result, controversy persists over the appropriate extent of surgery. This article reviews the impact of aggressive surgery on staging, disease-free survival, and cure rate. Despite recent advances in staging including positron emission tomography (PET), the findings after aggressive surgery indicate that the overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of clinical staging are still too low. These shortcomings in clinical staging therefore question the value of the indications, results, and interpretation of outcomes in multimodality treatment regimens. Extended surgery increases the R(0) resection rate, which seems to have an undeniable beneficial effect on the incidence of locoregional recurrence and which should be considered as a parameter of surgical quality, especially within the context of multimodality trials. As to the effect on cure rate, the only randomized trial with published results did not indicate a significant difference between extended and more limited resections for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and GEJ, albeit that a subsequent subanalysis did show a significant survival benefit favoring more extended surgery in distal third adenocarcinomas. However, the bulk of current literature suggests that better survival is achieved by more aggressive surgery. For three-field lymphadenectomy the available data suggest a potential survival benefit. It appears that positive cervical lymph nodes in patients with middle or proximal third carcinoma should no longer be considered as M(1a/b) distant lymph node metastasis but rather as N(1) regional disease.

Clinical implications of p53 tumor suppressor gene mutation and protein expression in esophageal adenocarcinomas: results of a ten-year prospective study

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to characterize the spectrum of p53 alterations (mutations and protein expression) in surgically resected esophageal adenocarcinomas, and to correlate molecular alterations with clinicopathologic findings and outcome.

METHODS

Between 1991 and 2001, 91 consecutive patients with esophageal adenocarcinomas underwent subtotal esophagectomy. No patient received induction therapy. Strict clinicopathologic criteria were used to define primary esophageal adenocarcinomas. Genomic DNA was extracted from esophageal tumors, each matched with histologically normal esophageal epithelium (internal control) from the resection margin. Polymerase chain reaction was used to amplify p53 exons 4 through 10. Mutations were studied by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis and direct DNA sequencing. Immunohistochemical testing (monoclonal antibody DO7) was used to evaluate p53 protein distribution.

RESULTS

Five-year overall survival was 27.3%. No p53 alterations (mutations and/or protein overexpression) were found in normal esophageal epithelium. A total of 57.1% (n = 52) of tumors had p53 alterations (mutations and/or protein overexpression), which on univariate analysis were associated with poor tumor differentiation (P =.001), advanced pTNM stage (P =.009), and number of involved lymph nodes (0, 1-3, >3; P =.04). Patients with p53 alterations had significantly reduced 5-year overall survival relative to patients with wild-type p53 (15% vs 46%; P =.004). The p53 mutations were predominantly G:C to A:T transitions at CpG dinucleotides (52.2%, 24/46)

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that p53 alterations (mutations and/or protein overexpression) are a predictor of reduced postoperative survival after surgical resection of esophageal adenocarcinomas and that p53 may be a clinically useful molecular marker for stratifying patients in future clinical trials. Patterns of p53 mutations suggest endogenous mutational mechanisms.

Evolution and critical appraisal of anastomotic technique following resection of esophageal adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to critically evaluate acute and long-term complications of hand-sewn and semimechanical cervical esophagogastric anastomosis following resection of primary esophageal adenocarcinoma. Between February 1991 and 2001, 91 consecutive patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy (transthoracic, n=49; transhiatal, n=42), transposing a gastric tube based on the right gastroepiploic artery. All esophagogastric anastomoses were performed in the left neck using a hand-sewn technique (n=53) and, from September 1997, a side-to-side semimechanical technique (n=38). Outcomes evaluated were anastomotic leak rates, length of stay, and development of strictures. Postoperative mortality was 4.4% (all cardiopulmonary causes). Fifty-eight patients (63.7%) had an uncomplicated postoperative course, with a median postoperative length of stay of 10 days (vs. 20 days with associated morbidity; P </= 0.001). Anastomotic leaks were the leading cause of postoperative morbidity (16.5%, 15/91), and were classified into four types based on severity. The semimechanical anastomotic technique was associated with a reduced leak rate compared with the hand-sewn technique (7.9%, 3/38 vs. 22.6%, 12/53; P=0.08), although different patterns of anastomotic failure were seen following semimechanical anastomoses, with increased mediastinal and pleural sepsis. Anastomotic strictures developed in nine (17.0%) hand-sewn and three (7.9%) semimechanical anastomoses. Our conclusion was that a semimechanical technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy is associated with reduced anastomotic leak rates compared with hand-sewn anastomoses, resulting in a shorter postoperative stay. Patterns of anastomotic failure varied between each technique, possibly as a consequence of a longer cervical esophageal segment required for construction of a semimechanical anastomosis. The association between anastomotic technique and stricture development was not clear from this study.