Meal type affects heartburn severity

Review of recent evidence on the management of heartburn in pregnant and breastfeeding women

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one the most common medical complaints in pregnant women. Some women continue to experience GERD symptoms after delivery. Effective management of GERD symptoms is important to improve productivity and quality of life. Management of heartburn in pregnant and breastfeeding women involves lifestyle modifications, dietary modifications, non-pharmaceutical remedies and pharmaceutical drugs. For most patients, lifestyle/dietary modifications are helpful in reducing GERD symptoms. For patients who require a more intense intervention, various types of pharmaceutical drugs are available. However, the suitability of each treatment for use during pregnancy and lactation must be taken into consideration. This article explores the reported efficacy and safety of these treatment options in pregnant and breastfeeding women. Recommended treatment algorithm in pregnant and breastfeeding women have been developed.

Regional postprandial differences in pH within the stomach and gastroesophageal junction

Our objective was to determine regional differences in intragastric pH after different types of meals. Ten normal subjects underwent 27-hr esophagogastric pH monitoring using a four-probe pH catheter. Meals were a spicy lunch, a high-fat dinner, and a typical bland breakfast. The fatty dinner had the highest postprandial buffering effect, elevating proximal and mid/distal gastric pH to 4.9 +/- 0.4 and 4.0 +/- 0.4, respectively, significantly (P < 0.05) higher compared to 4.2 +/- 0.3 and 3.0 +/- 0.4 for the spicy lunch and 3.0 +/- 0.3 and 2.5 +/- 0.8 for the breakfast. The buffering effect of the high-volume fatty meal to pH > 4 was also longer (150 min) compared to that of the spicy lunch (45 min) and the bland breakfast, which did not increase gastric pH to > 4 at any time. Proximal gastric acid pockets were seen between 15 and 90 min postprandially. These were located 3.4 +/- 0.8 cm below the proximal LES border, extending for a length of 2.3 +/- 0.8 cm, with a drop in mean pH from 4.7 +/- 0.4 to 1.5 +/- 0.9. Acid pockets were seen equally after the spicy lunch and fatty dinner but less frequently after the bland breakfast. We conclude that a high-volume fatty meal has the highest buffering effect on gastric pH compared to a spicy lunch or a bland breakfast. Buffering effects of meals are significantly higher in the proximal than in the mid/distal stomach. Despite the intragastric buffering effect of meals, focal areas of acidity were observed in the region of the cardia-gastroesophageal junction during the postprandial period.

Changing impact of gastroesophageal reflux in medical and otolaryngology practice

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

A major trend in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an observed increased prevalence of the problem, with an associated burden on health care resources. There are relatively few objective reports of increasing prevalence of this disease, and there are no epidemiologic reports that discuss changing practice strategies in managing the disease. The clinical problem is of critical importance to practicing otolaryngologists, who manage the impact of GERD on diseases affecting the ear, nose, and throat. The hypothesis of this thesis is that 1) GERD is an increasing problem affecting outpatient office visits over time, and 2) the disease is increasingly managed with prescription pharmacotherapy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective national medical database review using the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey.

METHODS

Twelve years of data (1990-2001) were examined with visits weighted to provide U.S. estimates of care. Average annual frequencies and visit rates were calculated for total visits and by age, sex, race, and physician specialty. Selected issues in GERD treatment were also examined, including prescriptions and physician/patient counseling regarding stress management, tobacco abuse, and diet modification. Trends were reported based on changes in care across three time periods to satisfy statistical significance: 1990 to 1993, 1994 to 1997, and 1998 to 2001.

RESULTS

Between 1990 and 1993 and 1998 and 2001, there was a significant increase in U.S. ambulatory care visits for GERD, from a rate of 1.7 per 100 to 4.7 per 100. There were no significant changes in race, although there was a small trend toward increased GERD visits in the age group over 44 years old and in the male sex. Office visits to otolaryngologists increased from 89,000 to 421,000 between the time periods of 1990 to 1993 and 1998 to 2001. This also represented a percent increase in office encounters by otolaryngologists compared with visits by all specialties from 2.9% to 4.4%. Over the three time periods, there was a fall in prescriptions for histamine (H2) blockers from 58.1% to 20.7% of total prescriptions. Over the same three time periods, prescriptions of proton pump inhibitors increased from 13.2% to 64.6%. Physician recommendations for over the counter medications fell from 18.8% to 6.6%. Average annual counseling during ambulatory care visits for GERD was assessed for the period from 1998 to 2001 as follows: diet counseling was provided at 27.2% of encounters, tobacco cessation counseling was provided at 3.9%, and stress management was discussed at 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

During the 1990s, there was a substantial increase in the use of ambulatory care services for GERD. Although much of this increase was among the primary care community, otolaryngologists appeared to have an increasingly prominent role in the management of this disease. There have also been dramatic changes in physician prescribing patterns for GERD, with the emergence of the predominant role of proton pump inhibitors. However, the use of physician counseling for lifestyle modification of factors known to affect GERD remains very low. The increasing impact of GERD on physician practice emphasizes the importance of both physician and patient education in the delivery of health care related to this disease.

Contemporary understanding and management of reflux and constipation in the general population and pregnancy: a consensus meeting

BACKGROUND

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and constipation have a major impact on public health; however, the wide variety of treatment options presents difficulties for recommending therapy. Lack of definitive guidelines in pharmacy and general practice medicine further exacerbates the decision dilemma.

AIMS

To address these issues, a panel of experts discussed the principles and practice of treating GERD and constipation in the general population and in pregnancy, with the aim of developing respective treatment guidelines.

RESULTS

The panel recommended antacids 'on-demand' as the first-line over-the-counter treatment in reflux, and as rescue medication for immediate relief when reflux breaks through with proton pump inhibitors. Calcium/magnesium-based antacids were recommended as the treatment of choice for pregnant women because of their good safety profile. In constipation, current data do not distinguish a hierarchy between polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based laxatives and other first-line treatments, although limitations are associated with stimulant- and bulk-forming laxatives. Where data are available, PEG is superior to lactulose in terms of efficacy. In pregnancy, PEG-based laxatives meet the criteria for the ideal treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts developed algorithms that present healthcare professionals with clear treatment options and management strategies for GERD and constipation in pharmacy and general practice medicine.

Colonic fermentation influences lower esophageal sphincter function in gastroesophageal reflux disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Colonic fermentation of carbohydrates is known to influence gastric and esophageal motility in healthy subjects. This study investigated the effects of colonic fermentation induced by oral administration of fructooligosaccharides (FOS) in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).

METHODS

In the cross-over design used in the study, 9 patients with symptomatic GERD were administered a low-residue diet (i.e., 10 g fiber/day) during 2, 7-day periods, receiving either 6.6 g of FOS or placebo 3 times daily after meals. Each period was separated by a wash out of at least 3 weeks. On day 7, esophageal motility and pH were recorded in fasting conditions and after a test meal containing 6.6 g of FOS or placebo. Breath hydrogen concentrations (reflecting colonic fermentation) and plasma concentrations of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), peptide YY, and cholecystokinin were monitored.

RESULTS

Compared with placebo, FOS led to a significant increase in the number of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) and reflux episodes, esophageal acid exposure, and the symptom score for GERD. The integrated plasma response of GLP-1 was significantly higher after FOS than placebo.

CONCLUSIONS

Colonic fermentation of indigestible carbohydrates increases the rate of TLESRs, the number of acid reflux episodes, and the symptoms of GERD. Although different mechanisms are likely to be involved, excess release of GLP-1 may account, at least in part, for these effects.

Clinical effectiveness of a new antacid chewing gum on heartburn and oesophageal pH control

BACKGROUND

Oesophageal acid neutralization with antacids depends on the duration of oesophageal antacid exposure and acid neutralizing capacity. A gum that releases antacid as it is chewed could take advantage of both mechanisms to enhance heartburn relief.

METHODS

Twenty-four subjects were crossed over to four regimens: placebo, chewable antacid tablets (1000 mg CaCO3), lower dose gum (600 mg CaCO3) and higher dose gum (900 mg CaCO3). A dual pH probe was placed, subjects ate a standardized provocative meal and self-dosed once as needed. Symptoms were recorded every 15 min using visual analogue and Likert scales.

RESULTS

SYMPTOMS

Both gums decreased heartburn compared to placebo for 120 min. Higher dose gum decreased heartburn more than chewable antacids up to 120 min post-dose. pH: Active chewable antacid and gums immediately increased oesophageal pH, with significant improvement 15-30 min post-dose.

SUMMARY

(i) both gums promptly decreased heartburn and elevated oesophageal pH; (ii) both gums provided sustained relief for 120 min; (iii) antacid gums provided faster and more prolonged symptom relief and pH control than chewable antacids.

CONCLUSIONS

Calcium carbonate gum effectively neutralizes oesophageal acidity and relieves symptoms following a meal, and is superior to chewable antacids in terms of the duration of heartburn relief.

Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux and gastroesophageal reflux disease

Gastroesophageal reflux is a physiological phenomenon, occurring with different severity and duration in different individuals. Reflux occurs when this normal event results in the occurrence of symptoms/signs or complications. The pathophysiology of gastroesophageal reflux is complex and diverse, since it is influenced by factors that are genetic, environmental (e.g., diet smoking), anatomic, hormonal, and neurogenic. However, many mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Future research should focus on a better understanding of the physiology of the upper and lower esophageal sphincters, and of gastric motility. The afferent and efferent neural pathways and neuropharmacologic mediators of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations and gastric dysmotility require further study. The role of anatomic malformations such as hiatal hernia in children has been underestimated. While therapeutic possibilities are greater in number and largely improved, the outcomes of some treatments are far from satisfactory in many cases. In addition to development of new forms of treatment, research should address better use of currently available medical and surgical treatments.

Effects of antacid formulation on postprandial oesophageal acidity in patients with a history of episodic heartburn

BACKGROUND

Heartburn self-treatment with antacids is extremely common. If the oesophagus is the primary site of antacid action, chewable antacids might raise the oesophageal pH more effectively than swallowable tablets.

AIM

To establish a model to assess postprandial acid reflux and to compare the onset and duration of action on oesophageal pH of different antacid formulations.

METHODS

Twenty subjects with a history of episodic heartburn underwent eight pH monitoring sessions each for 5.5 h postprandially. One hour after consuming a meal consisting of chili, cheese, raw onions and cola, subjects received 750 mg, 1500 mg and 3000 mg of either chewable or swallowable CaCO3 tablets, an effervescent bicarbonate solution or placebo. Oesophageal and gastric pH data were collected.

RESULTS

Mean intra-oesophageal pH remained lower than baseline for more than 1 h (pH range 5-5.5) postprandially, indicating reflux of somewhat acidic intragastric contents into the oesophagus. The onset of action on oesophageal pH was similar for all antacids (30-35 min). The duration of action on pH varied: chewable tablets and effervescent bicarbonate had relatively long durations of action (oesophagus, 40-45 min; stomach, 100-180 min); swallowable tablets had little effect.

CONCLUSIONS

The meal model used in this study dependably produced acidic gastro-oesophageal reflux. Antacids increased oesophageal pH independent of gastric pH, demonstrating that chewing antacids controls oesophageal acidity more effectively than swallowing antacid tablets.

Why alternative medicine cannot be evidence-based

The concept of evidence-based medicine (EBM) has been widely adopted by orthodox Western medicine. Proponents of EBM have argued that complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) modalities ought to be subjected to rigorous, controlled clinical trials in order to assess their efficacy. However, this does not represent a scientific necessity, but rather is a philosophical demand: promoters of EBM seek to establish their particular epistemology as the primary arbiter of all medical knowledge. This claim is problematic. The methods for obtaining knowledge in a healing art must be coherent with that art's underlying understanding and theory of illness. Thus, the method of EBM and the knowledge gained from population-based studies may not be the best way to assess certain CAM practices, which view illness and healing within the context of a particular individual only. In addition, many alternative approaches center on the notion of non-measurable but perceptible aspects of illness and health (e.g., Qi) that preclude study within the current framework of controlled clinical trials. Still, the methods of developing knowledge within CAM currently have limitations and are subject to bias and varied interpretation. CAM must develop and defend a rational and coherent method for assessing causality and efficacy, though not necessarily one based on the results of controlled clinical trials. Orthodox medicine should consider abandoning demands that CAM become evidence-based, at least as "evidence" is currently narrowly defined, but insist instead upon a more complete and coherent description and defense of the alternative epistemic methods and tools of these disciplines.

Review article: alginate-raft formulations in the treatment of heartburn and acid reflux

Alginate-based raft-forming formulations have been marketed word-wide for over 30 years under various brand names, including Gaviscon. They are used for the symptomatic treatment of heartburn and oesophagitis, and appear to act by a unique mechanism which differs from that of traditional antacids. In the presence of gastric acid, alginates precipitate, forming a gel. Alginate-based raft-forming formulations usually contain sodium or potassium bicarbonate; in the presence of gastric acid, the bicarbonate is converted to carbon dioxide which becomes entrapped within the gel precipitate, converting it into a foam which floats on the surface of the gastric contents, much like a raft on water. Both in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that alginate-based rafts can entrap carbon dioxide, as well as antacid components contained in some formulations, thus providing a relatively pH-neutral barrier. Several studies have demonstrated that the alginate raft can preferentially move into the oesophagus in place, or ahead, of acidic gastric contents during episodes of gastro-oesophageal reflux; some studies further suggest that the raft can act as a physical barrier to reduce reflux episodes. Although some alginate-based formulations also contain antacid components which can provide significant acid neutralization capacity, the efficacy of these formulations to reduce heartburn symptoms does not appear to be totally dependent on the neutralization of bulk gastric contents. The strength of the alginate raft is dependant on several factors, including the amount of carbon dioxide generated and entrapped in the raft, the molecular properties of the alginate, and the presence of aluminium or calcium in the antacid components of the formulation. Raft formation occurs rapidly, often within a few seconds of dosing; hence alginate-containing antacids are comparable to traditional antacids for speed of onset of relief. Since the raft can be retained in the stomach for several hours, alginate-based raft-forming formulations can additionally provide longer-lasting relief than that of traditional antacids. Indeed, clinical studies have shown Gaviscon is superior to placebo, and equal to or significantly better than traditional antacids for relieving heartburn symptoms. Alginate-based, raft-forming formulations have been used to treat reflux symptoms in infants and children, and in the management of heartburn and reflux during pregnancy. While Gaviscon is effective when used alone, it is compatible with, and does not interfere with the activity of antisecretory agents such as cimetidine. Even with the introduction of new antisecretory and promotility agents, alginate-rafting formulations will continue to have a role in the treatment of heartburn and reflux symptoms. Their unique non-systemic mechanism of action provides rapid and long-duration relief of heartburn and acid reflux symptoms.

The effects of capsaicin on reflux, gastric emptying and dyspepsia

AIMS

To evaluate capsaicin's effects on heartburn, dyspepsia, gastric acidity and emptying, and gastro-oesophageal reflux, and to test the hypothesis that capsaicin induces heartburn and exacerbates symptoms by sensitizing the oesophagus.

METHODS

Eleven heartburn sufferers underwent two separate pH monitoring sessions and assessments of gastric emptying (13C-octanoic acid breath test), heartburn and dyspepsia (100 mm VAS) after a non-irritant meal. The meal consisted of a sausage biscuit with egg, cheese and 30 g raw onion, 8 oz chocolate milk and a peppermint patty. Thirty minutes prior to meal consumption, subjects were administered a placebo capsule. On visit 1, subjects consumed the meal containing 100 microl 13C-octanoic acid cooked in the egg, over 15 min. On visit 2, subjects consumed the meal plus 5 mg capsaicin in gelatin capsules.

RESULTS

Oesophageal and gastric pH profiles and gastric emptying were not different between meals. Capsaicin did not alter mean heartburn and dyspepsia scores (P > 0.05), but significantly decreased time to peak heartburn (120 min vs. 247 min; P < 0.003). Time to peak dyspepsia was not altered by capsaicin (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Capsaicin enhances noxious postprandial heartburn, presumably by direct effects on sensory neurons.