Palaeoanthropology. Fossil muzzles and other puzzles

Does the primate pattern hold up? Testing the functional significance of infraorbital foramen size variation among marsupials

OBJECTIVES

The relative size of the infraorbital foramen (IOF) has been used to infer the ecology of extinct primates for several decades. Primates have relatively smaller IOFs than most other mammals, which may result from the fact that they pre-process and manipulate food with their hands rather than their muzzles. In primates, relative IOF area co-varies with diet, where insectivores and folivores have relatively smaller IOFs than frugivores. We wanted to determine whether the observed patterns associated with IOF variation hold across other orders.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We examined how relative IOF area differs among marsupials occupying different ecological niches. Marsupials were chosen because they converge with primates in both ecology and morphology, but unlike primates, some marsupials approach and pre-process foods only with their muzzles. We measured IOF area and cranial lengths from 72 marsupial species, and behavioral feeding data were obtained from a subset of this sample (N = 20).

RESULTS

Relative IOF area did not vary significantly between substrate preferences. However, relative IOF area differed significantly by diet category (P < 0.001). Species that specialize in feeding on non-grassy leaves have significantly smaller relative IOF areas than species which primarily feed on grasses, insects, vertebrates, or some combination thereof. Behavioral analyses support that folivorous marsupials approach and remove food with the hands more often than marsupials from other dietary groups.

DISCUSSION

Results suggest that relatively small IOF area may reflect increased reliance on the hands while feeding, and that relative IOF size can be used as an indicator of feeding behavior.

Enamel and dentine development and the life history profile of Victoriapithecus macinnesi from Maboko Island, Kenya

Two permanent lower second molar teeth (KNM-MB 19841 and KNM-MB 27844) attributed to Victoriapithecus macinnesi were prepared for histological analysis. A further five male and three female canine teeth were replicated with a silicone impression material and perikymata counts subsequently made on epoxy casts over the whole crown surface. Daily enamel cross striations averaged 6 microm apart in both cuspal and lateral enamel of the molars and the total crown formation times were approximately 1.24 years in the molars and, using the same periodicity determined from the molars, 1.84 and 1.36 years respectively in the male and female canines. Rates of dentine formation matched those known for extant macaques and were used to calculate root extension rates, which averaged 11.5 microm per day over the whole 8 mm root length of KNM-MB 19841. The period between M2 initiation and gingival emergence was estimated to be approximately 1.95 years in Victoriapithecus which is greater than estimates for Cebus albifrons and Chlorocebus aethiops, (which are similar in body mass to Victoriapithecus), but less than estimates made here for several macaque species. A speculative picture of dental development in Victoriapithecus emerges that is slower than that known for modern vervet monkeys and may have been more similar to that in some smaller modern macaque species.