Are changes in HLA Ags responsible for leukemia relapse after HLA-matched allogeneic hematopoietic SCT?

Strategies to reduce relapse risk in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukaemia

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation is a centrally important curative strategy in adults with acute myeloid leukaemia; however, relapse occurs in a significant proportion of patients and remains the leading cause of treatment failure. The prognosis for patients who relapse post-transplant remains poor, and the development of new strategies with the ability to reduce disease recurrence without increasing transplant toxicity remains a priority. In this review, within the context of our understanding of disease biology and the graft-versus-leukaemia (GVL) effect, we will discuss established, evolving and novel approaches for increasing remission rates, decreasing measurable residual disease pretransplant, future methods to augment the GVL effect and the opportunities for post-transplant maintenance. Future progress depends upon the development of innovative trials and networks, which will ensure the rapid assessment of emerging therapies in prospective clinical trials.

[Relapse with HLA loss after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with non-HLA identical donor: Guidelines from the Francophone society of bone marrow transplantation and cellular therapy (SFGM-TC)]

Loss of heterozygosity or HLA loss is a genomic-type escape mechanism highlighted in certain types of relapses after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with a non-HLA identical donor, and especially after haplo-identical transplantation. The diagnosis must be made with certainty because the result conditions the therapy. In this article, the different mechanisms and techniques that can be used for the diagnosis of loss of heterozygosity, as well as the therapeutic options are reviewed, making it possible to establish clinico-biological recommendations for the diagnosis confirmation and management of the patients in relapse.

Loss of heterozygosity leading to incorrect HLA typing for platelet-transfusion refractory patient

BACKGROUND

Management of platelet-transfusion refractory (PR) patients due to anti-HLA antibodies includes the provision of HLA-matched (HLAm) platelets (PLT) or PLTs that are negative for HLA antigens corresponding to the recipient antibodies. Obtaining HLAm PLTs is predicated on accurate HLA antigen typing of the recipient and donor. Here, we present the clinical implications of a case involving loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in a patient presented for PR workup.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

HLA typing was performed by three methods: (1) Real-time PCR; (2) Sequence-specific oligonucleotide (SSO) typing test; and (3) Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS). Cytogenomic SNP microarray was utilized to assess LOH.

RESULTS

A 30-year-old female with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia was found to be PR secondary to HLA sensitization. A peripheral blood (PB) sample, containing 93% myeloid blast cells, was sent for HLA typing for the provision of HLAm PLTs. HLA typing revealed homozygosity at the HLA-A locus but was heterozygous at the -B and -C loci. After chemotherapy, HLA typing on a new PB sample, devoid of blast cells, identified HLA-A locus heterozygosity, which was subsequently confirmed by real-time PCR and NGS. Cytogenomic SNP microarray analysis demonstrated LOH of the HLA-A locus on chromosome 6p in the pretreatment sample but not in the posttreatment sample.

CONCLUSION

In hematologic patients with high tumor burden, HLA homozygosity should be viewed with suspicion for potential LOH. Therefore, HLA testing should be repeated, preferably with a non-hematological source (e.g., buccal swab) or following successful reduction of the tumor burden.

Clinical Characteristics and Outcome Analysis for HLA Loss Patients Following Partially Mismatched Related Donor Transplantation Using HLA Chimerism for Loss of Heterozygosity Analysis by Next-Generation Sequencing

Genomic loss of mismatched human leukocyte antigen (HLA loss) is one of the most vital immune escape mechanisms of leukemic cells after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). However, the methods currently used for HLA loss analysis have some shortcomings. Limited literature has been published, especially in lymphoid malignancies. This study aims to evaluate the incidences, risk factors of HLA loss, and clinical outcomes of HLA loss patients. In all, 160 patients undergoing partially mismatched related donor (MMRD) transplantation from 18 centers in China were selected for HLA loss analysis with the next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based method, which was validated by HLA-KMR. Variables of the prognostic risk factors for HLA loss or HLA loss–related relapse were identified with the logistic regression or the Fine and Gray regression model. An HLA loss detection system, HLA-CLN [HLA chimerism for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) analysis by NGS], was successfully developed. Forty (25.0%) patients with HLA loss were reported, including 27 with myeloid and 13 with lymphoid malignancies. Surprisingly, 6 of those 40 patients did not relapse. The 2-year cumulative incidences of HLA loss (22.7% vs 22.0%, P = 0.731) and HLA loss–related relapse (18.4% vs 20.0%, P = 0.616) were similar between patients with myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. The number of HLA mismatches (5/10 vs <5/10) was significantly associated with HLA loss in the whole cohort [odds ratio (OR): 3.15, P = 0.021] and patients with myeloid malignancies (OR: 3.94, P = 0.021). A higher refined-disease risk index (OR: 6.91, P = 0.033) and donor–recipient ABO incompatibility (OR: 4.58, P = 0.057) contributed to HLA loss in lymphoid malignancies. To sum up, HLA-CLN could overcome the limitations of HLA-KMR and achieve a better HLA coverage for more patients. The clinical characteristics and outcomes were similar in patients with HLA loss between myeloid and lymphoid malignancies. In addition, the results suggested that a patient with HLA loss might not always relapse.

The novel HLA-DRB1*12:02:11 allele identified by next-generation sequencing in a Chinese bone marrow donor

HLA-DRB1*12:02:11 differs from HLA-DRB1*12:02:01:01 by a single nucleotide substitution at position 579 T > G. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

A practical guide to chimerism analysis: Review of the literature and testing practices worldwide

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Currently there are no widely accepted guidelines for chimerism analysis testing in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) patients. The objective of this review is to provide a practical guide to address key aspects of performing and utilizing chimerism testing results. In developing this guide, we conducted a survey of testing practices among laboratories that are accredited for performing engraftment monitoring/chimerism analysis by either the American Society for Histocompatibility & Immunogenetics (ASHI) and/or the European Federation of Immunogenetics (EFI). We interpreted the survey results in the light of pertinent literature as well as the experience in the laboratories of the authors.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

In recent years there has been significant advances in high throughput molecular methods such as next generation sequencing (NGS) as well as growing access to these technologies in histocompatibility and immunogenetics laboratories. These methods have the potential to improve the performance of chimerism testing in terms of sensitivity, availability of informative genetic markers that distinguish donors from recipients as well as cost.

SUMMARY

The results of the survey revealed a great deal of heterogeneity in chimerism testing practices among participating laboratories. The most consistent response indicated monitoring of engraftment within the first 30 days. These responses are reflective of published literature. Additional clinical indications included early detection of impending relapse as well as identification of cases of HLA-loss relapse.

Immune Reconstitution after Haploidentical Donor and Umbilical Cord Blood Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is the only potentially curative therapy for a variety of hematologic diseases. However, this therapeutic platform is limited by an initial period when patients are profoundly immunocompromised. There is gradual immune recovery over time, that varies by transplant platform. Here, we review immune reconstitution after allogeneic HCT with a specific focus on two alternative donor platforms that have dramatically improved access to allogeneic HCT for patients who lack an HLA-matched related or unrelated donor: haploidentical and umbilical cord blood HCT. Despite challenges, interventions are available to mitigate the risks during the immunocompromised period including antimicrobial prophylaxis, modified immune suppression strategies, graft manipulation, and emerging adoptive cell therapies. Such interventions can improve the potential for long-term overall survival after allogeneic HCT.

T cell optimization for graft-versus-leukemia responses

Protection from relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is partly due to donor T cell-mediated graft-versus-leukemia (GVL) immune responses. Relapse remains common in HCT recipients, but strategies to augment GVL could significantly improve outcomes after HCT. Donor T cells with αβ T cell receptors (TCRs) mediate GVL through recognition of minor histocompatibility antigens and alloantigens in HLA-matched and -mismatched HCT, respectively. αβ T cells specific for other leukemia-associated antigens, including nonpolymorphic antigens and neoantigens, may also deliver an antileukemic effect. γδ T cells may contribute to GVL, although their biology and specificity are less well understood. Vaccination or adoptive transfer of donor-derived T cells with natural or transgenic receptors are strategies with potential to selectively enhance αβ and γδ T cell GVL effects.

Mechanisms of Leukemia Immune Evasion and Their Role in Relapse After Haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Over the last decade, the development of multiple strategies to allow the safe transfer from the donor to the patient of high numbers of partially HLA-incompatible T cells has dramatically reduced the toxicities of haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (haplo-HCT), but this was not accompanied by a similar positive impact on the incidence of post-transplantation relapse. In the present review, we will elaborate on how the unique interplay between HLA-mismatched immune system and malignancy that characterizes haplo-HCT may impact relapse biology, shaping the selection of disease variants that are resistant to the “graft-vs.-leukemia” effect. In particular, we will present current knowledge on genomic loss of HLA, a relapse modality first described in haplo-HCT and accounting for a significant proportion of relapses in this setting, and discuss other more recently identified mechanisms of post-transplantation immune evasion and relapse, including the transcriptional downregulation of HLA class II molecules and the enforcement of inhibitory checkpoints between T cells and leukemia. Ultimately, we will review the available treatment options for patients who relapse after haplo-HCT and discuss on how a deeper insight into relapse immunobiology might inform the rational and personalized selection of therapies to improve the largely unsatisfactory clinical outcome of relapsing patients.

The role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the management of acute myeloid leukaemia: a triumph of hope and experience

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the commonest indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) worldwide. The accumulated experience of allografting in AML over the last four decades has provided critical insights into both the contribution of the conditioning regimen and the graft-versus-leukaemia effect to the curative potential of the most common form of immunotherapy utilised in standard clinical practice. Coupled with advances in donor availability and transplant technologies, this has resulted in allo-SCT becoming an important treatment modality for the majority of adults with high-risk AML. At the same time, advances in genomic classification, coupled with progress in the accurate quantification of measurable residual disease, have increased the precision with which allo-mandatory patients can be identified, whilst simultaneously permitting accurate identification of those patients who can be spared the toxicity of an allograft. Despite this progress, disease recurrence still remains a major cause of transplant failure and AML has served as a paradigm for the development of strategies to reduce the risk of relapse - notably the novel concept of post-transplant maintenance, utilising pharmacological or cellular therapies.

Immune Escape after Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT): From Mechanisms to Novel Therapies

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the most common type of acute leukemia in adults. Recent advances in understanding its molecular basis have opened the way to new therapeutic strategies, including targeted therapies. However, despite an improvement in prognosis it has been documented in recent years (especially in younger patients) that allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) remains the only curative treatment in AML and the first therapeutic option for high-risk patients. After allo-HSCT, relapse is still a major complication, and is observed in about 50% of patients. Current evidence suggests that relapse is not due to clonal evolution, but instead to the ability of the AML cell population to escape immune control by a variety of mechanisms including the altered expression of HLA-molecules, production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, relevant metabolic changes and expression of immune checkpoint (ICP) inhibitors capable of “switching-off” the immune response against leukemic cells. Here, we review the main mechanisms of immune escape and identify potential strategies to overcome these mechanisms.

Immune Escape of Relapsed AML Cells after Allogeneic Transplantation

BACKGROUND

As consolidation therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML), allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation provides a benefit in part by means of an immune-mediated graft-versus-leukemia effect. We hypothesized that the immune-mediated selective pressure imposed by allogeneic transplantation may cause distinct patterns of tumor evolution in relapsed disease.

METHODS

We performed enhanced exome sequencing on paired samples obtained at initial presentation with AML and at relapse from 15 patients who had a relapse after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (with transplants from an HLA-matched sibling, HLA-matched unrelated donor, or HLA-mismatched unrelated donor) and from 20 patients who had a relapse after chemotherapy. We performed RNA sequencing and flow cytometry on a subgroup of these samples and on additional samples for validation.

RESULTS

On exome sequencing, the spectrum of gained and lost mutations observed with relapse after transplantation was similar to the spectrum observed with relapse after chemotherapy. Specifically, relapse after transplantation was not associated with the acquisition of previously unknown AML-specific mutations or structural variations in immune-related genes. In contrast, RNA sequencing of samples obtained at relapse after transplantation revealed dysregulation of pathways involved in adaptive and innate immunity, including down-regulation of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II genes ( HLA-DPA1, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DQB1, and HLA-DRB1) to levels that were 3 to 12 times lower than the levels seen in paired samples obtained at presentation. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemical analysis confirmed decreased expression of MHC class II at relapse in 17 of 34 patients who had a relapse after transplantation. Evidence suggested that interferon-γ treatment could rapidly reverse this phenotype in AML blasts in vitro.

CONCLUSIONS

AML relapse after transplantation was not associated with the acquisition of relapse-specific mutations in immune-related genes. However, it was associated with dysregulation of pathways that may influence immune function, including down-regulation of MHC class II genes, which are involved in antigen presentation. These epigenetic changes may be reversible with appropriate therapy. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and others.).

Selected biological issues affecting relapse after stem cell transplantation: role of T-cell impairment, NK cells and intrinsic tumor resistance

The graft vs. leukemia (GvL) effect as a method of preventing relapse is well described after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but the mechanisms to this effect and how tumor sometimes develops resistance to GvL are just beginning to be understood. This article reviews and expands upon data presented at the Third International Workshop on Biology, Prevention and Treatment of Relapse after Stem Cell Transplantation held in Hamburg, Germany, in November 2016. We first discuss in detail the role that T-cell impairment early after HCT plays in relapse by looking at data from T cell-depleted approaches as well as the clear role that early T-cell recovery has shown in improving outcomes. We then review key findings regarding the role of specific KIR donor/recipient pairings that contribute to relapse prevention after HCT for several tumor types. Finally, we discuss a unique mouse model following the development of tumor resistance to GvL. Detailed molecular characterization of events marking the development of tumor resistance to the immunotherapy of GvL may help in developing future strategies to overcome immune escape.

Loss of Mismatched HLA on the Leukemic Blasts of Patients With Relapsed Lymphoid Malignancies Following Bone Marrow Transplantation From Related Donors With HLA Class II Mismatches in the Graft Versus Host Direction

Mechanisms of relapse of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) after human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remain unclear. We report two children with relapsed ALL after HSCT from related donors with HLA-DRB1 and -DQB1 mismatches in the graft versus host direction. One lost HLA-DRB1, DQB1, and DPB1 alleles, and the other lost one HLA haplotype of the leukemic blasts at relapse. HLA class II loss may be a triggering event for ALL relapse after partially HLA-mismatched-related HSCT. In addition, HLA typing of relapsed leukemic blasts could be vital in the selection of retransplant donors.