Peripheral blood progenitor cell collection in pediatric patients optimized by high pre-apheresis count of circulating CD34+ cells and high blood flow

Effect of Autograft CD34+ Dose on Outcome in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for Central Nervous System Tumors

BACKGROUND

Consolidation with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) has improved survival for patients with central nervous system tumors (CNSTs). The impact of the autologous graft CD34+ dose on patient outcomes is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the relationship between CD34⁺ dose, total nucleated cell (TNC) dose, and clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), relapse, non-relapse mortality (NRM), endothelial-injury complications (EIC), and time to neutrophil engraftment in children undergoing autologous HSCT for CNSTs.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of the CIBMTR database was performed. Children aged <10 years who underwent autologous HSCT between 2008-2018 for an indication of CNST were included. An optimal cut point was identified for patient age, CD34⁺ cell dose, and TNC, using the maximum likelihood method and PFS as an endpoint. Univariable analysis for PFS, OS, and relapse was described using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. Cox models were fitted for PFS and OS outcomes. Cause-specific hazards models were fitted for relapse and NRM.

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen patients met the inclusion criteria. A statistically significant association was identified between autograft CD34+ content and clinical outcomes. Children receiving >3.6×10⁶/kg CD34⁺ cells experienced superior PFS (p=0.04) and OS (p=0.04) compared to children receiving ≤3.6×10⁶/kg. Relapse rates were lower in patients receiving >3.6×10⁶/kg CD34⁺ cells (p=0.05). Higher CD34⁺ doses were not associated with increased NRM (p=0.59). Stratification of CD34⁺ dose by quartile did not reveal any statistically significant differences between quartiles for 3-year PFS (p=0.66), OS (p=0.29), risk of relapse (p=0.57), or EIC (p=0.87). There were no significant differences in patient outcomes based on TNC, and those receiving a TNC >4.4×10⁸/kg did not experience superior PFS (p=0.26), superior OS (p=0.14), reduced risk of relapse (p=0.37), or reduced NRM (p=0.25). Children with medulloblastoma had superior PFS (p<0.001), OS (p=0.01), and relapse rates (p=0.001) compared to those with other CNS tumor types. Median time to neutrophil engraftment was 10 days vs 12 days in the highest and lowest infused CD34+ quartiles, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For children undergoing autologous HSCT for CNSTs, increasing CD34⁺ cell dose was associated with significantly improved OS and PFS, and lower relapse rates, without increased NRM or EICs.

A high-throughput microfluidic device based on controlled incremental filtration to enable centrifugation-free, low extracorporeal volume leukapheresis

Leukapheresis, the extracorporeal separation of white blood cells (WBCs) from red blood cells (RBCs) and platelets (PLTs), is a life-saving procedure used for treating patients with cancer and other conditions, and as the initial step in the manufacturing of cellular and gene-based therapies. Well-tolerated by adults, leukapheresis poses a significant risk to neonates and low-weight infants because the extracorporeal volume (ECV) of standard centrifugation-based machines represents a particularly large fraction of these patients' total blood volume. Here we describe a novel high-throughput microfluidic device (with a void volume of 0.4 mL) based on controlled incremental filtration (CIF) technology that could replace centrifugation for performing leukapheresis. The CIF device was tested extensively using whole blood from healthy volunteers at multiple hematocrits (5-30%) and flow rates (10-30 mL/min). In the flow-through regime, the CIF device separated WBCs with > 85% efficiency and 10-15% loss of RBCs and PLTs while processing whole blood diluted with saline to 10% hematocrit at a flow rate of 10 mL/min. In the recirculation regime, the CIF device demonstrated a similar level of separation performance, virtually depleting WBCs in the recirculating blood (~ 98% reduction) by the end of a 3.5-hour simulated leukapheresis procedure. Importantly, the device operated without clogging or decline in separation performance, with minimal activation of WBCs and PLTs and no measurable damage to RBCs. Compared to the typical parameters of centrifugation-based leukapheresis, the CIF device had a void volume at least 100-fold smaller, removed WBCs about twice as fast, and lost ~ 2-3-fold fewer PLTs, while operating at a flow rate compatible with the current practice. The hematocrit and flow rate at which the CIF device operated were significantly higher than previously published for other microfluidic cell separation methods. Finally, this study is the first to demonstrate a highly efficient separation of cells from recirculating blood using a microfluidic device. Overall, these findings suggest the feasibility of using high-throughput microfluidic cell separation technology to ultimately enable centrifugation-free, low-ECV leukapheresis. Such a capability would be particularly useful in young children, a vulnerable group of patients who are currently underserved.

Peripheral blood stem and progenitor cell collection in pediatric candidates for ex vivo gene therapy: a 10-year series

Hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell (HSPC)-based gene therapy (GT) requires the collection of a large number of cells. While bone marrow (BM) is the most common source of HSPCs in pediatric donors, the collection of autologous peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) is an attractive alternative for GT. We present safety and efficacy data of a 10-year cohort of 45 pediatric patients who underwent PBSC collection for backup and/or purification of CD34⁺ cells for ex vivo gene transfer. Median age was 3.7 years and median weight 15.8 kg. After mobilization with lenograstim/plerixafor (n = 41) or lenograstim alone (n = 4) and 1−3 cycles of leukapheresis, median collection was 37 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. The procedures were well tolerated. Patients who collected ≥7 and ≥13 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg in the first cycle had pre-apheresis circulating counts of at ≥42 and ≥86 CD34⁺ cells/μL, respectively. Weight-adjusted CD34⁺ cell yield was positively correlated with peripheral CD34⁺ cell counts and influenced by female gender, disease, and drug dosage. All patients received a GT product above the minimum target, ranging from 4 to 30.9 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. Pediatric PBSC collection compares well to BM harvest in terms of CD34⁺ cell yields for the purpose of GT, with a favorable safety profile.

Plerixafor-based mobilization in pediatric healthy donors with unfavorable donor/recipient body weight ratio resulted in a better CD34+ collection yield: A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

In order to propose risk-adapted mobilization algorithms, several authors have tried to look for predictive factors of the CD34⁺ yield in healthy pediatric donors. Donor recipient body weight ratio (D/R ratio) was identified as one of the main variables related with the success to achieve the target cell dose for transplantation. According to this variable we modified the mobilization schedule.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We report the results of 46 mobilizations and apheresis procedures performed in our center with unfavorable D/R ratio. Mobilization was attempted by the standard regime of G-CSF (10 mcg/kg/24 hours) in 28 cases (60.9%), with high dose G-CSF (10 mcg/kg/12 hours) in 9 cases (19.6%), and with plerixafor and G-CSF single dose regime in 9 cases (19.6%).

RESULTS

CD34⁺ cell quantification before apheresis is closely related to CD34⁺ yield, being the only factor related to collected CD34⁺ cells (beta .71; P < .0001). The mobilization efficiency was higher in plerixafor group compared to the other two schedules (P < .0001). By using plerixafor for mobilization, we achieved the target CD34⁺ cell dose of ≥2 × 10⁶ /kg per recipient body weight in all cases with unfavorable D/R ratio. It was observed that 17.4% of cases that not reached the established target cell dose were located in the standard or high-dose mobilization regimes. This difference is even greater for optimal collections (≥5 × 10⁶ /kg), since of the 54.3% cases that did not reach this goal none was mobilized by plerixafor.

CONCLUSION

Tailoring the mobilization regime we can reach the target cell dose, even in those cases with the worst D/R ratio.