1
|
Pozniak J, Pedri D, Landeloos E, Van Herck Y, Antoranz A, Vanwynsberghe L, Nowosad A, Roda N, Makhzami S, Bervoets G, Maciel LF, Pulido-Vicuña CA, Pollaris L, Seurinck R, Zhao F, Flem-Karlsen K, Damsky W, Chen L, Karagianni D, Cinque S, Kint S, Vandereyken K, Rombaut B, Voet T, Vernaillen F, Annaert W, Lambrechts D, Boecxstaens V, Saeys Y, van den Oord J, Bosisio F, Karras P, Shain AH, Bosenberg M, Leucci E, Paschen A, Rambow F, Bechter O, Marine JC. A TCF4-dependent gene regulatory network confers resistance to immunotherapy in melanoma. Cell 2024; 187:166-183.e25. [PMID: 38181739 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.11.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
To better understand intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), we established a comprehensive view of the cellular architecture of the treatment-naive melanoma ecosystem and studied its evolution under ICB. Using single-cell, spatial multi-omics, we showed that the tumor microenvironment promotes the emergence of a complex melanoma transcriptomic landscape. Melanoma cells harboring a mesenchymal-like (MES) state, a population known to confer resistance to targeted therapy, were significantly enriched in early on-treatment biopsies from non-responders to ICB. TCF4 serves as the hub of this landscape by being a master regulator of the MES signature and a suppressor of the melanocytic and antigen presentation transcriptional programs. Targeting TCF4 genetically or pharmacologically, using a bromodomain inhibitor, increased immunogenicity and sensitivity of MES cells to ICB and targeted therapy. We thereby uncovered a TCF4-dependent regulatory network that orchestrates multiple transcriptional programs and contributes to resistance to both targeted therapy and ICB in melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Pozniak
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Dennis Pedri
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Laboratory for Membrane Trafficking, Center for Brain and Disease Research, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ewout Landeloos
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Asier Antoranz
- Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven and UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lukas Vanwynsberghe
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ada Nowosad
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Niccolò Roda
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Samira Makhzami
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Greet Bervoets
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lucas Ferreira Maciel
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Carlos Ariel Pulido-Vicuña
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lotte Pollaris
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Ruth Seurinck
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fang Zhao
- Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Immunology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Karine Flem-Karlsen
- Department of Dermatology, Yale University, 15 York Street, New Haven, CT 05610, USA
| | - William Damsky
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Yale University, 15 York Street, New Haven, CT 05610, USA
| | - Limin Chen
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Despoina Karagianni
- Immune Regulation and Tumor Immunotherapy Group, Cancer Immunology Unit, Research Department of Haematology, UCL Cancer Institute, London WC1E 6DD, UK
| | - Sonia Cinque
- Laboratory for RNA Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Sam Kint
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Katy Vandereyken
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Benjamin Rombaut
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thierry Voet
- Laboratory of Reproductive Genomics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; KU Leuven Institute for Single Cell Omics (LISCO), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Wim Annaert
- Laboratory for Membrane Trafficking, Center for Brain and Disease Research, VIB, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Laboratory of Translational Genetics, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Center for Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Yvan Saeys
- Data Mining and Modeling for Biomedicine Group, VIB Center for Inflammation Research, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joost van den Oord
- Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, Department of Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesca Bosisio
- Laboratory of Translational Cell and Tissue Research, Department of Pathology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Panagiotis Karras
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Hunter Shain
- Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marcus Bosenberg
- Departments of Dermatology, Pathology and Immunobiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 05610, USA
| | - Eleonora Leucci
- Laboratory for RNA Cancer Biology, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Annette Paschen
- Laboratory of Molecular Tumor Immunology, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Florian Rambow
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Applied Computational Cancer Research, Institute for AI in Medicine (IKIM), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.
| | - Oliver Bechter
- Department of General Medical Oncology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| | - Jean-Christophe Marine
- Laboratory for Molecular Cancer Biology, Center for Cancer Biology, VIB, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Addala V, Newell F, Pearson JV, Redwood A, Robinson BW, Creaney J, Waddell N. Computational immunogenomic approaches to predict response to cancer immunotherapies. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:28-46. [PMID: 37907723 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00830-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Cancer immunogenomics is an emerging field that bridges genomics and immunology. The establishment of large-scale genomic collaborative efforts along with the development of new single-cell transcriptomic techniques and multi-omics approaches have enabled characterization of the mutational and transcriptional profiles of many cancer types and helped to identify clinically actionable alterations as well as predictive and prognostic biomarkers. Researchers have developed computational approaches and machine learning algorithms to accurately obtain clinically useful information from genomic and transcriptomic sequencing data from bulk tissue or single cells and explore tumours and their microenvironment. The rapid growth in sequencing and computational approaches has resulted in the unmet need to understand their true potential and limitations in enabling improvements in the management of patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapies. In this Review, we describe the computational approaches currently available to analyse bulk tissue and single-cell sequencing data from cancer, stromal and immune cells, as well as how best to select the most appropriate tool to address various clinical questions and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Venkateswar Addala
- Cancer Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Felicity Newell
- Cancer Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - John V Pearson
- Cancer Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alec Redwood
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Institute of Respiratory Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Biomedical Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Bruce W Robinson
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Institute of Respiratory Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Jenette Creaney
- National Centre for Asbestos Related Diseases, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Institute of Respiratory Health, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- School of Biomedical Science, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Nicola Waddell
- Cancer Program, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pickering C, Aiyetan P, Xu G, Mitchell A, Rice R, Najjar YG, Markowitz J, Ebert LM, Brown MP, Tapia-Rico G, Frederick D, Cong X, Serie D, Lindpaintner K, Schwarz F, Boland GM. Plasma glycoproteomic biomarkers identify metastatic melanoma patients with reduced clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1187332. [PMID: 37388743 PMCID: PMC10302726 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1187332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The clinical success of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in both resected and metastatic melanoma has confirmed the validity of therapeutic strategies that boost the immune system to counteract cancer. However, half of patients with metastatic disease treated with even the most aggressive regimen do not derive durable clinical benefit. Thus, there is a critical need for predictive biomarkers that can identify individuals who are unlikely to benefit with high accuracy so that these patients may be spared the toxicity of treatment without the likely benefit of response. Ideally, such an assay would have a fast turnaround time and minimal invasiveness. Here, we utilize a novel platform that combines mass spectrometry with an artificial intelligence-based data processing engine to interrogate the blood glycoproteome in melanoma patients before receiving ICI therapy. We identify 143 biomarkers that demonstrate a difference in expression between the patients who died within six months of starting ICI treatment and those who remained progression-free for three years. We then develop a glycoproteomic classifier that predicts benefit of immunotherapy (HR=2.7; p=0.026) and achieves a significant separation of patients in an independent cohort (HR=5.6; p=0.027). To understand how circulating glycoproteins may affect efficacy of treatment, we analyze the differences in glycosylation structure and discover a fucosylation signature in patients with shorter overall survival (OS). We then develop a fucosylation-based model that effectively stratifies patients (HR=3.5; p=0.0066). Together, our data demonstrate the utility of plasma glycoproteomics for biomarker discovery and prediction of ICI benefit in patients with metastatic melanoma and suggest that protein fucosylation may be a determinant of anti-tumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Pickering
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Paul Aiyetan
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Gege Xu
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Alan Mitchell
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Rachel Rice
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Yana G. Najjar
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| | - Joseph Markowitz
- Department of Cutaneous Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
- Immuno-Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Lisa M. Ebert
- Centre for Cancer Biology, South Australia (SA) Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Michael P. Brown
- Centre for Cancer Biology, South Australia (SA) Pathology and University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Gonzalo Tapia-Rico
- Cancer Clinical Trials Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Dennie Frederick
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Xin Cong
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Daniel Serie
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Flavio Schwarz
- InterVenn Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Genevieve M. Boland
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dickerson LK, Carter JA, Kohli K, Pillarisetty VG. Emerging interleukin targets in the tumour microenvironment: implications for the treatment of gastrointestinal tumours. Gut 2023:gutjnl-2023-329650. [PMID: 37258094 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2023-329650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
The effectiveness of antitumour immunity is dependent on intricate cytokine networks. Interleukins (ILs) are important mediators of complex interactions within the tumour microenvironment, including regulation of tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte proliferation, differentiation, migration and activation. Our evolving and increasingly nuanced understanding of the cell type-specific and heterogeneous effects of IL signalling has presented unique opportunities to fine-tune elaborate IL networks and engineer new targeted immunotherapeutics. In this review, we provide a primer for clinicians on the challenges and potential of IL-based treatment. We specifically detail the roles of IL-2, IL-10, IL-12 and IL-15 in shaping the tumour-immune landscape of gastrointestinal malignancies, paying particular attention to promising preclinical findings, early-stage clinical research and innovative therapeutic approaches that may properly place ILs to the forefront of immunotherapy regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jason A Carter
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Karan Kohli
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Flatiron Bio, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Venu G Pillarisetty
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pulanco MC, Madsen AT, Tanwar A, Corrigan DT, Zang X. Recent advancements in the B7/CD28 immune checkpoint families: new biology and clinical therapeutic strategies. Cell Mol Immunol 2023:10.1038/s41423-023-01019-8. [PMID: 37069229 DOI: 10.1038/s41423-023-01019-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The B7/CD28 families of immune checkpoints play vital roles in negatively or positively regulating immune cells in homeostasis and various diseases. Recent basic and clinical studies have revealed novel biology of the B7/CD28 families and new therapeutics for cancer therapy. In this review, we discuss the newly discovered KIR3DL3/TMIGD2/HHLA2 pathways, PD-1/PD-L1 and B7-H3 as metabolic regulators, the glycobiology of PD-1/PD-L1, B7x (B7-H4) and B7-H3, and the recently characterized PD-L1/B7-1 cis-interaction. We also cover the tumor-intrinsic and -extrinsic resistance mechanisms to current anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapies in clinical settings. Finally, we review new immunotherapies targeting B7-H3, B7x, PD-1/PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in current clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc C Pulanco
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Anne T Madsen
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA
- Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Ankit Tanwar
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA
- Department of Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Devin T Corrigan
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA
| | - Xingxing Zang
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA.
- Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA.
- Department of Oncology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, 10461, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chen S, Zhang L, Lin H, Liang Y, Wang Y. Functional Gene Expression Signatures from On-Treatment Tumor Specimens Predict Anti-PD1 Blockade Response in Metastatic Melanoma. Biomolecules 2022; 13. [PMID: 36671443 DOI: 10.3390/biom13010058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Functional gene expression signatures (FGES) from pretreatment biopsy samples have been used to predict the responses of metastatic melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies. However, there are no predictive FGE signatures from patients receiving treatment. Here, using the Elastic Net Regression (ENLR) algorithm, we analyzed transcriptomic and matching clinical data from a dataset of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with ICB therapies and produced an FGE signature for pretreatment (FGES-PRE) and on-treatment (FGES-ON). Both the FGES-PRE and FGES-ON signatures are validated in three independent datasets of metastatic melanoma as the validation set, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.44-0.81 and 0.82-0.83, respectively. Then, we combined all test samples and obtained AUCs of 0.71 and 0.82 for the FGES-PRE and FGES-ON signatures, respectively. The FGES-ON signatures had a higher predictive value for prognosis than the FGES-PRE signatures. The FGES-PRE and FGES-ON signatures were divided into high- and low-risk scores using the signature score mean value. Patients with a high FGE signature score had better survival outcomes than those with low scores. Overall, we determined that the FGES-ON signature is an effective biomarker for metastatic melanoma patients receiving ICB therapy. This work would provide an important theoretical basis for applying FGE signatures derived from on-treatment tumor samples to predict patients' therapeutic response to ICB therapies.
Collapse
|
7
|
Seyhan AA, Carini C. Insights and Strategies of Melanoma Immunotherapy: Predictive Biomarkers of Response and Resistance and Strategies to Improve Response Rates. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 24:ijms24010041. [PMID: 36613491 PMCID: PMC9820306 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the recent successes and durable responses with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), many cancer patients, including those with melanoma, do not derive long-term benefits from ICI therapies. The lack of predictive biomarkers to stratify patients to targeted treatments has been the driver of primary treatment failure and represents an unmet medical need in melanoma and other cancers. Understanding genomic correlations with response and resistance to ICI will enhance cancer patients' benefits. Building on insights into interplay with the complex tumor microenvironment (TME), the ultimate goal should be assessing how the tumor 'instructs' the local immune system to create its privileged niche with a focus on genomic reprogramming within the TME. It is hypothesized that this genomic reprogramming determines the response to ICI. Furthermore, emerging genomic signatures of ICI response, including those related to neoantigens, antigen presentation, DNA repair, and oncogenic pathways, are gaining momentum. In addition, emerging data suggest a role for checkpoint regulators, T cell functionality, chromatin modifiers, and copy-number alterations in mediating the selective response to ICI. As such, efforts to contextualize genomic correlations with response into a more insightful understanding of tumor immune biology will help the development of novel biomarkers and therapeutic strategies to overcome ICI resistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Attila A. Seyhan
- Laboratory of Translational Oncology and Experimental Cancer Therapeutics, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
- Joint Program in Cancer Biology, Lifespan Health System and Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
- Legorreta Cancer Center, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
- Correspondence:
| | - Claudio Carini
- School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, New Hunt’s House, Guy’s Campus, King’s College London, London SE1 1UL, UK
- Biomarkers Consortium, Foundation of the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roviello G, Bersanelli M, Catalano M. The latest developments in biomarkers predicting response to immunotherapy. Immunotherapy 2022; 14:1085-1088. [PMID: 35924468 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2022-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Tweetable abstract Biomarkers predicting response to immune checkpoint inhibitors can facilitate the selection of patients who benefit from immunotherapy, avoiding rapid disease progression in nonresponders and needless toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giandomenico Roviello
- Department of Health Sciences, Section of Clinical Pharmacology & Oncology, University of Florence, Viale Pieraccini, 6, Florence, 50139, Italy
| | - Melissa Bersanelli
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Parma, Via Gramsci 14, Parma, 43126, Italy
| | - Martina Catalano
- School of Human Health Sciences, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, Florence, 50134, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Engelsen AST, Lotsberg ML, Abou Khouzam R, Thiery JP, Lorens JB, Chouaib S, Terry S. Dissecting the Role of AXL in Cancer Immune Escape and Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibition. Front Immunol 2022; 13:869676. [PMID: 35572601 PMCID: PMC9092944 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.869676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The development and implementation of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI) in clinical oncology have significantly improved the survival of a subset of cancer patients with metastatic disease previously considered uniformly lethal. However, the low response rates and the low number of patients with durable clinical responses remain major concerns and underscore the limited understanding of mechanisms regulating anti-tumor immunity and tumor immune resistance. There is an urgent unmet need for novel approaches to enhance the efficacy of ICI in the clinic, and for predictive tools that can accurately predict ICI responders based on the composition of their tumor microenvironment. The receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) AXL has been associated with poor prognosis in numerous malignancies and the emergence of therapy resistance. AXL is a member of the TYRO3-AXL-MERTK (TAM) kinase family. Upon binding to its ligand GAS6, AXL regulates cell signaling cascades and cellular communication between various components of the tumor microenvironment, including cancer cells, endothelial cells, and immune cells. Converging evidence points to AXL as an attractive molecular target to overcome therapy resistance and immunosuppression, supported by the potential of AXL inhibitors to improve ICI efficacy. Here, we review the current literature on the prominent role of AXL in regulating cancer progression, with particular attention to its effects on anti-tumor immune response and resistance to ICI. We discuss future directions with the aim to understand better the complex role of AXL and TAM receptors in cancer and the potential value of this knowledge and targeted inhibition for the benefit of cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnete S. T. Engelsen
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Maria L. Lotsberg
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Raefa Abou Khouzam
- Thumbay Research Institute for Precision Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
| | - Jean-Paul Thiery
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
- Guangzhou Laboratory, Guangzhou, China
- Inserm, UMR 1186, Integrative Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France
| | - James B. Lorens
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Department of Biomedicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Salem Chouaib
- Thumbay Research Institute for Precision Medicine, Gulf Medical University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Inserm, UMR 1186, Integrative Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University Paris Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Stéphane Terry
- Inserm, UMR 1186, Integrative Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy, Villejuif, France
- Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
- Faculty of Medicine, University Paris Sud, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
- Research Department, Inovarion, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Du K, Wei S, Wei Z, Frederick DT, Miao B, Moll T, Tian T, Sugarman E, Gabrilovich DI, Sullivan RJ, Liu L, Flaherty KT, Boland GM, Herlyn M, Zhang G. Pathway signatures derived from on-treatment tumor specimens predict response to anti-PD1 blockade in metastatic melanoma. Nat Commun 2021; 12:6023. [PMID: 34654806 PMCID: PMC8519947 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-26299-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Both genomic and transcriptomic signatures have been developed to predict responses of metastatic melanoma to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapies; however, most of these signatures are derived from pre-treatment biopsy samples. Here, we build pathway-based super signatures in pre-treatment (PASS-PRE) and on-treatment (PASS-ON) tumor specimens based on transcriptomic data and clinical information from a large dataset of metastatic melanoma treated with anti-PD1-based therapies as the training set. Both PASS-PRE and PASS-ON signatures are validated in three independent datasets of metastatic melanoma as the validation set, achieving area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.45-0.69 and 0.85-0.89, respectively. We also combine all test samples and obtain AUCs of 0.65 and 0.88 for PASS-PRE and PASS-ON signatures, respectively. When compared with existing signatures, the PASS-ON signature demonstrates more robust and superior predictive performance across all four datasets. Overall, we provide a framework for building pathway-based signatures that is highly and accurately predictive of response to anti-PD1 therapies based on on-treatment tumor specimens. This work would provide a rationale for applying pathway-based signatures derived from on-treatment tumor samples to predict patients' therapeutic response to ICB therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuang Du
- Department of Computer Science, Ying Wu College of Computing, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA
| | - Shiyou Wei
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Zhi Wei
- Department of Computer Science, Ying Wu College of Computing, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
| | | | - Benchun Miao
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Tabea Moll
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Tian Tian
- Department of Computer Science, Ying Wu College of Computing, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA
| | - Eric Sugarman
- Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, 19131, USA
| | | | - Ryan J Sullivan
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Lunxu Liu
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Keith T Flaherty
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
| | - Genevieve M Boland
- Department of Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02114, USA.
| | - Meenhard Herlyn
- Molecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program and Melanoma Research Center, The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Gao Zhang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- The Preston Robert Tisch Brain Tumor Center, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Department of Pathology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luo H, Bu D, Shao L, Li Y, Sun L, Wang C, Wang J, Yang W, Yang X, Dong J, Zhao Y, Li F. Single-cell Long Non-coding RNA Landscape of T Cells in Human Cancer Immunity. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics 2021; 19:377-393. [PMID: 34284134 PMCID: PMC8864193 DOI: 10.1016/j.gpb.2021.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Revised: 12/03/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
The development of new biomarkers or therapeutic targets for cancer immunotherapies requires deep understanding of T cells. To date, the complete landscape and systematic characterization of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in T cells in cancer immunity are lacking. Here, by systematically analyzing full-length single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data of more than 20,000 libraries of T cells across three cancer types, we provided the first comprehensive catalog and the functional repertoires of lncRNAs in human T cells. Specifically, we developed a custom pipeline for de novotranscriptome assembly and obtained a novel lncRNA catalog containing 9433 genes. This increased the number of current human lncRNA catalog by 16% and nearly doubled the number of lncRNAs expressed in T cells. We found that a portion of expressed genes in single T cells were lncRNAs which had been overlooked by the majority of previous studies. Based on metacell maps constructed by the MetaCell algorithm that partitions scRNA-seq datasets into disjointed and homogenous groups of cells (metacells), 154 signature lncRNA genes were identified. They were associated with effector, exhausted, and regulatory T cell states. Moreover, 84 of them were functionally annotated based on the co-expression networks, indicating that lncRNAs might broadly participate in the regulation of T cell functions. Our findings provide a new point of view and resource for investigating the mechanisms of T cell regulation in cancer immunity as well as for novel cancer-immune biomarker development and cancer immunotherapies
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haitao Luo
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China; Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
| | - Dechao Bu
- Bioinformatics Research Group, Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Advanced Computing Research Center, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Lijuan Shao
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China; Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
| | - Yang Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China
| | - Liang Sun
- Bioinformatics Research Group, Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Advanced Computing Research Center, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Ce Wang
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China; Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
| | - Wei Yang
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China
| | - Xiaofei Yang
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China
| | - Jun Dong
- Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine Postdoctoral Research Station, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China.
| | - Yi Zhao
- Bioinformatics Research Group, Key Laboratory of Intelligent Information Processing, Advanced Computing Research Center, Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China.
| | - Furong Li
- Translational Medicine Collaborative Innovation Center, The Second Clinical Medical College (Shenzhen People's Hospital), Jinan University, Shenzhen 518020, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Research and Clinical Transformation, Shenzhen 518020, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Sun S, Xu L, Zhang X, Pang L, Long Z, Deng C, Zhu J, Zhou S, Wan L, Pang B, Xiao Y. Systematic Assessment of Transcriptomic Biomarkers for Immune Checkpoint Blockade Response in Cancer Immunotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13071639. [PMID: 33915876 PMCID: PMC8037221 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13071639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2021] [Revised: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The aim of our study was to evaluate the predictive performance of transcriptomic biomarkers to immune response. The study collected 22 transcriptomic biomarkers and constructed multiple benchmark datasets to evaluate their predictive performance of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) response in pre-treatment patients with distinct ICB agents in diverse cancers. We found “Immune-checkpoint molecule” biomarkers PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4 and IMPRES and the “Effector molecule” biomarker CYT showed significant associations with ICB response and clinical outcomes. These immune-checkpoint biomarkers and another immune effector IFN-gamma presented predictive ability in melanoma, urothelial cancer and clear cell renal-cell cancer. Interestingly, for anti-PD-1 therapy and anti-CTLA-4 therapy, the top-performing response biomarkers were usually mutually exclusive even though in the same biomarker category and most of biomarkers with outstanding predictive power were observed in patients with combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Abstract Background: Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has yielded successful clinical responses in treatment of a minority of patients in certain cancer types. Substantial efforts were made to establish biomarkers for predicting responsiveness to ICB. However, the systematic assessment of these ICB response biomarkers remains insufficient. Methods: We collected 22 transcriptome-based biomarkers for ICB response and constructed multiple benchmark datasets to evaluate the associations with clinical response, predictive performance, and clinical efficacy of them in pre-treatment patients with distinct ICB agents in diverse cancers. Results: Overall, “Immune-checkpoint molecule” biomarkers PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA-4 and IMPRES and the “Effector molecule” biomarker CYT showed significant associations with ICB response and clinical outcomes. These immune-checkpoint biomarkers and another immune effector IFN-gamma presented predictive ability in melanoma, urothelial cancer (UC) and clear cell renal-cell cancer (ccRCC). In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), only PD-L2 and CTLA-4 showed preferable correlation with clinical response. Under different ICB therapies, the top-performing biomarkers were usually mutually exclusive in patients with anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy, and most of biomarkers presented outstanding predictive power in patients with combined anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 therapy. Conclusions: Our results show these biomarkers had different performance in predicting ICB response across distinct ICB agents in diverse cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shangqin Sun
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Liwen Xu
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Xinxin Zhang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Lin Pang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Zhilin Long
- School of Life Sciences, Westlake University, Hangzhou 310024, China;
| | - Chunyu Deng
- Wenzhou Research Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Wenzhou 325001, China;
| | - Jiali Zhu
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Shuting Zhou
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Linyun Wan
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
| | - Bo Pang
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
- Correspondence: (B.P.); (Y.X.)
| | - Yun Xiao
- College of Bioinformatics Science and Technology, Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150081, China; (S.S.); (L.X.); (X.Z.); (L.P.); (J.Z.); (S.Z.); (L.W.)
- Correspondence: (B.P.); (Y.X.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhou Z, Zhang J, Xu C, Yang J, Zhang Y, Liu M, Shi X, Li X, Zhan H, Chen W, McNally LR, Fung KM, Luo W, Houchen CW, He Y, Zhang C, Li M. An integrated model of N6-methyladenosine regulators to predict tumor aggressiveness and immune evasion in pancreatic cancer. EBioMedicine 2021; 65:103271. [PMID: 33714027 PMCID: PMC7966986 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2020] [Revised: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most abundant mRNA modification. Whether m6A regulators can determine tumor aggressiveness and risk of immune evasion in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unknown. METHODS An integrated model named "m6Ascore" is constructed based on RNA-seq data of m6A regulators in PDAC. Association of m6Ascore and overall survival is validated across several different datasets. Overlaps of m6Ascore and established molecular classifications of PDAC is examined. Immune infiltration, enriched pathways, somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs), mutation profiles and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors are compared between m6Ascore-high and m6Ascore-low tumors. FINDINGS m6Ascore is associated with dismal overall survival and increased tumor recurrence in PDAC as well as several other solid tumors including colorectal cancer and breast cancer. Basal-like (Squamous) PDAC has higher m6Ascore than that in the classical PDAC. Mechanism study showed m6Ascore-high tumors are characterized with reduced immune infiltration and T cells exhaustion. Meanwhile, m6Ascore is associated with genes regulating cachexia and chemoresistance in PDAC. Furthermore, distinct SCNAs patterns and mutation profiles of KRAS and TP53 are present in m6Ascore-high tumors, indicating immune evasion. m6Ascore-low tumors have higher response rates to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). INTERPRETATION These findings indicate m6Ascore can predict aggressiveness and immune evasion in pancreatic cancer. This model has implications for pancreatic cancer prognosis and treatment response to ICIs. FUNDING This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) grants to M. Li (R01 CA186338, R01 CA203108, R01 CA247234 and the William and Ella Owens Medical Research Foundation) and NIH/National Cancer Institute Q39 award P30CA225520 to Stephenson Cancer Center.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhijun Zhou
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Junxia Zhang
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Chao Xu
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Hudson College of Public Health, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Jingxuan Yang
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Yuqing Zhang
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Mingyang Liu
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Xiuhui Shi
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Xiaoping Li
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Hanxiang Zhan
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Wei Chen
- Digestive Diseases Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Lacey R McNally
- Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Kar-Ming Fung
- Department of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Wenyi Luo
- Department of Pathology, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Courtney W Houchen
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States
| | - Yulong He
- Digestive Diseases Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, China
| | - Changhua Zhang
- Digestive Diseases Center, The Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, 628 Zhenyuan Road, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518107, China.
| | - Min Li
- Department of Medicine, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States; Department of Surgery, The University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Binder H, Schmidt M, Loeffler-Wirth H, Mortensen LS, Kunz M. Melanoma Single-Cell Biology in Experimental and Clinical Settings. J Clin Med 2021; 10:506. [PMID: 33535416 PMCID: PMC7867095 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 01/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Cellular heterogeneity is regarded as a major factor for treatment response and resistance in a variety of malignant tumors, including malignant melanoma. More recent developments of single-cell sequencing technology provided deeper insights into this phenomenon. Single-cell data were used to identify prognostic subtypes of melanoma tumors, with a special emphasis on immune cells and fibroblasts in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, treatment resistance to checkpoint inhibitor therapy has been shown to be associated with a set of differentially expressed immune cell signatures unraveling new targetable intracellular signaling pathways. Characterization of T cell states under checkpoint inhibitor treatment showed that exhausted CD8+ T cell types in melanoma lesions still have a high proliferative index. Other studies identified treatment resistance mechanisms to targeted treatment against the mutated BRAF serine/threonine protein kinase including repression of the melanoma differentiation gene microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) and induction of AXL receptor tyrosine kinase. Interestingly, treatment resistance mechanisms not only included selection processes of pre-existing subclones but also transition between different states of gene expression. Taken together, single-cell technology has provided deeper insights into melanoma biology and has put forward our understanding of the role of tumor heterogeneity and transcriptional plasticity, which may impact on innovative clinical trial designs and experimental approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Binder
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany; (H.B.); (M.S.); (H.L.-W.); (L.S.M.)
| | - Maria Schmidt
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany; (H.B.); (M.S.); (H.L.-W.); (L.S.M.)
| | - Henry Loeffler-Wirth
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany; (H.B.); (M.S.); (H.L.-W.); (L.S.M.)
| | - Lena Suenke Mortensen
- Interdisciplinary Center for Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, 04107 Leipzig, Germany; (H.B.); (M.S.); (H.L.-W.); (L.S.M.)
| | - Manfred Kunz
- Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Philipp-Rosenthal-Str. 23-25, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Smart JA, Oleksak JE, Hartsough EJ. Cell Adhesion Molecules in Plasticity and Metastasis. Mol Cancer Res 2020; 19:25-37. [PMID: 33004622 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-20-0595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 09/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Prior to metastasis, modern therapeutics and surgical intervention can provide a favorable long-term survival for patients diagnosed with many types of cancers. However, prognosis is poor for patients with metastasized disease. Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer, yet in situ and localized, thin melanomas can be biopsied with little to no postsurgical follow-up. However, patients with metastatic melanoma require significant clinical involvement and have a 5-year survival of only 34% to 52%, largely dependent on the site of colonization. Melanoma metastasis is a multi-step process requiring dynamic changes in cell surface proteins regulating adhesiveness to the extracellular matrix (ECM), stroma, and other cancer cells in varied tumor microenvironments. Here we will highlight recent literature to underscore how cell adhesion molecules (CAM) contribute to melanoma disease progression and metastasis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica A Smart
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Julia E Oleksak
- Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences and Professional Studies, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Edward J Hartsough
- Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zhou X, Qu M, Tebon P, Jiang X, Wang C, Xue Y, Zhu J, Zhang S, Oklu R, Sengupta S, Sun W, Khademhosseini A. Screening Cancer Immunotherapy: When Engineering Approaches Meet Artificial Intelligence. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2020; 7:2001447. [PMID: 33042756 PMCID: PMC7539186 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202001447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 05/16/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Immunotherapy is a class of promising anticancer treatments that has recently gained attention due to surging numbers of FDA approvals and extensive preclinical studies demonstrating efficacy. Nevertheless, further clinical implementation has been limited by high variability in patient response to different immunotherapeutic agents. These treatments currently do not have reliable predictors of efficacy and may lead to side effects. The future development of additional immunotherapy options and the prediction of patient-specific response to treatment require advanced screening platforms associated with accurate and rapid data interpretation. Advanced engineering approaches ranging from sequencing and gene editing, to tumor organoids engineering, bioprinted tissues, and organs-on-a-chip systems facilitate the screening of cancer immunotherapies by recreating the intrinsic and extrinsic features of a tumor and its microenvironment. High-throughput platform development and progress in artificial intelligence can also improve the efficiency and accuracy of screening methods. Here, these engineering approaches in screening cancer immunotherapies are highlighted, and a discussion of the future perspectives and challenges associated with these emerging fields to further advance the clinical use of state-of-the-art cancer immunotherapies are provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xingwu Zhou
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringHenry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied SciencesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Moyuan Qu
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- State Key Laboratory of Oral DiseasesNational Clinical Research Center for Oral DiseasesWest China Hospital of StomatologySichuan UniversityChengdu610041China
| | - Peyton Tebon
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Xing Jiang
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- School of NursingNanjing University of Chinese MedicineNanjing210023China
| | - Canran Wang
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Yumeng Xue
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Jixiang Zhu
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringSchool of Basic Medical SciencesGuangzhou Medical UniversityGuangzhou511436China
| | - Shiming Zhang
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Rahmi Oklu
- Minimally Invasive Therapeutics LaboratoryDivision of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyMayo ClinicPhoenixAZ85054USA
| | - Shiladitya Sengupta
- Harvard–Massachusetts Institute of Technology Division of Health Sciences and TechnologyHarvard Medical SchoolBostonMA02115USA
| | - Wujin Sun
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
| | - Ali Khademhosseini
- Department of BioengineeringUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Center for Minimally Invasive TherapeuticsCalifornia NanoSystems InstituteUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular EngineeringHenry Samueli School of Engineering and Applied SciencesUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Department of RadiologyDavid Geffen School of MedicineUniversity of California, Los AngelesLos AngelesCA90095USA
- Terasaki Institute for Biomedical InnovationLos AngelesCA90064USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lee JH, Shklovskaya E, Lim SY, Carlino MS, Menzies AM, Stewart A, Pedersen B, Irvine M, Alavi S, Yang JYH, Strbenac D, Saw RPM, Thompson JF, Wilmott JS, Scolyer RA, Long GV, Kefford RF, Rizos H. Transcriptional downregulation of MHC class I and melanoma de- differentiation in resistance to PD-1 inhibition. Nat Commun 2020; 11:1897. [PMID: 32312968 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15726-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 136] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2019] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Transcriptomic signatures designed to predict melanoma patient responses to PD-1 blockade have been reported but rarely validated. We now show that intra-patient heterogeneity of tumor responses to PD-1 inhibition limit the predictive performance of these signatures. We reasoned that resistance mechanisms will reflect the tumor microenvironment, and thus we examined PD-1 inhibitor resistance relative to T-cell activity in 94 melanoma tumors collected at baseline and at time of PD-1 inhibitor progression. Tumors were analyzed using RNA sequencing and flow cytometry, and validated functionally. These analyses confirm that major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I downregulation is a hallmark of resistance to PD-1 inhibitors and is associated with the MITFlow/AXLhigh de-differentiated phenotype and cancer-associated fibroblast signatures. We demonstrate that TGFß drives the treatment resistant phenotype (MITFlow/AXLhigh) and contributes to MHC class I downregulation in melanoma. Combinations of anti-PD-1 with drugs that target the TGFß signaling pathway and/or which reverse melanoma de-differentiation may be effective future therapeutic strategies. A significant proportion of patients develop innate or acquired resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Here, the authors show that resistance to anti-PD-1 blockade is associated with TGF-beta driven major histocompatibility complex I (MHCI) down-regulation and a de-differentiated phenotype in melanoma patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Filipovic A, Miller G, Bolen J. Progress Toward Identifying Exact Proxies for Predicting Response to Immunotherapies. Front Cell Dev Biol 2020; 8:155. [PMID: 32258034 PMCID: PMC7092703 DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical value and utility of checkpoint inhibitors, a drug class targeting adaptive immune suppression pathways (PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4), is growing rapidly and maintains status of a landmark achievement in oncology. Their efficacy has transformed life expectancy in multiple deadly cancer types (melanoma, lung cancer, renal/urothelial carcinoma, certain colorectal cancers, lymphomas, etc.). Despite significant clinical development efforts, therapeutic indication of approved checkpoint inhibitors are not as wide as the oncology community and patients would like them to be, potentially bringing into question their universal efficacy across tumor histologies. With the main goal of expanding immunotherapy applications, identifying of biomarkers to accurately predict therapeutic response and treatment related side-effects are a paramount need in the field. Specificities surrounding checkpoint inhibitors in clinic, such as unexpected tumor response patterns (pseudo- and hyper-progression), late responders, as well as specific immune mediated toxicities, complicate the management of patients. They stem from the complexities and dynamics of the tumor/host immune interactions, as well as baseline tumor biology. Search for clinically effective biomarkers therefore calls for a holistic approach, rather than implementation of a single analyte. The goal is to achieve dynamic and comprehensive acquisition, analyses and interpretation of immunological and biologic information about the tumor and the immune system, and to compute these parameters into an actionable, maximally predictive value at the individual patient level. Limitation delaying swift incorporation of validated immuno-oncology biomarkers span from standardized biospecimens acquisition and processing, selection of proficient biomarker discovery and validation methods, to establishing multidisciplinary consortiums and data sharing platforms. Multi-disciplinary efforts have already yielded some approved (PDL-1 and MSI-status) and other advanced tests (TMB, neoantigen pattern, and TIL infiltration rate). Importantly, clinical trial taskforces now recognize the imperative of the biomarker-driven trial design and execution, to enable translating biomarker discoveries into the clinical setting. This will ensure we utilize the “conspiracy” between the peripheral and intra-tumoral dynamic markers in shaping responses to checkpoint blockade, for the ultimate patient benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - George Miller
- New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Auslander N, Lee JS, Ruppin E. Reply to: 'IMPRES does not reproducibly predict response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy in metastatic melanoma'. Nat Med 2019; 25:1836-1838. [PMID: 31806908 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-019-0646-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Noam Auslander
- National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Joo Sang Lee
- Cancer Data Science Lab (CDSL), National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.,Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Eytan Ruppin
- Cancer Data Science Lab (CDSL), National Cancer Institute, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|