Prevalence of self-reported arm morbidity following treatment for breast cancer in the Australian Breast Cancer Family Study

Risk factors for long-term arm morbidities following breast cancer treatments: A systematic review

PURPOSE

To examine the risk factors for arm morbidity following breast cancer treatments, taking a broad view of all types of physical morbidity, including prolonged pain, lymphedema, decreased range of motion, and functional limitations.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines. Studies exploring the risk factors for prolonged arm morbidity following breast cancer surgery and treatments were included. The studies were assessed independently according to pre-eligibility criteria, following data extraction and methodological quality assessment.

RESULTS

1,242 articles were identified. After removing duplicates, the full texts of 1,153 articles were examined. Sixty-nine of these articles met the criteria and were included in the review. These 69 articles identified 29 risk factors for arm morbidity following treatments for breast cancer. The risk of bias was evaluated using NIH study quality assessment tools. The studies reviewed were published between 2001 and 2021 and included a total of 22,886 patients who were followed up for between three months and 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The main risk factors for long-term morbidity are removal of lymph nodes from the axilla, body mass index >30, having undergone a mastectomy, the stage of the disease, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, infection and trauma to the affected arm after surgery. An understanding of the risk factors for prolonged arm morbidity after surgery can help doctors and therapists in making personalized decisions about the need and timing of rehabilitation treatments.

Long-Term Effects of Breast Cancer Therapy and Care: Calm after the Storm?

Breast cancer is still a lethal disease and the leading cause of death in women, undermining patients' survival and quality of life. Modern techniques of surgery and radiotherapy allow for the obtaining of good results in terms of survival, however they cause long-term side effects that persist over time, such as lymphedema and neuropathy. Similarly, the advent of new therapies such as endocrine therapy revolutionized breast cancer outcomes, but side effects are still present even in years of follow-up after cure. Besides the side effects of medical and surgical therapy, breast cancer is a real disruption in patients' lives considering quality of life-related aspects such as the distortion of body image, the psychological consequences of the diagnosis, and the impact on family dynamics. Therefore, the doctor-patient relationship is central to providing the best support both during treatment and afterwards. The aim of this review is to summarize the consequences of medical and surgical treatment on breast cancer patients and to emphasize the importance of early prevention of side effects to improve patients' quality of life.

The effects of complex decongestive therapy on pain and functionality in individuals with breast cancer who developed adhesive capsulitis due to lymphedema: an evaluation by an isokinetic computerized system

Background

This study aimed to determine the impact of complex decongestive therapy applications on upper extremity function in breast cancer patients who developed adhesive capsulitis after lymphedema.

Methods

Thirty patients who developed adhesive capsulitis due to lymphedema were divided into two groups as study (n = 15) and control (n = 15) groups. Both groups received 20 minutes of exercise five days a week for three weeks using a Biodex isokinetic dynamometer, as well as a hot pack and TENS (Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation) treatment to the shoulder joint. The study group received 45 minutes of intensive decongestive therapy along with the adhesive capsulitis treatment. The visual analogue scale was used to assess pain, circumference, and volumetric measurements were used to assess edema, and the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Problems Questionnaire (DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) was used to assess upper extremity functionality. The shoulder range of motion was evaluated.

Results

Both groups had improvements in pain (P < 0.001), shoulder joint range of motion (P < 0.001), and upper extremity functionality (P < 0.001) after the treatment. There was a significant decrease in circumference and volumetric measurements in the study group (P < 0.001). However, no differences were seen in measurements in the control group.

Conclusions

The results showed that complex decongestive therapy was beneficial in reducing lymphedema in breast cancer patients who acquired adhesive capsulitis due to lymphedema. Consequently, the authors believe that supplementing conventional physiotherapy with complex decongestive therapy will benefit patients.

Upper limb rehabilitation system based on virtual reality for breast cancer patients: Development and usability study

Background

Functional exercise is crucial for breast cancer patients after surgery, and the use of virtual reality technology to assist patients with postoperative upper limb functional rehabilitation has gradually attracted the attention of researchers. However, the usability of the developed rehabilitation system is still unknown to a large extent. The purpose of this study was to develop a virtual reality upper limb rehabilitation system for patients after breast cancer surgery and to explore its usability.

Methods

We built a multidisciplinary team based on virtual reality and human-computer interaction technology and designed and developed an upper limb function rehabilitation system for breast cancer patients after surgery. Breast cancer patients were recruited from a grade III-a general hospital in Changchun city for the experiment. We used the System Usability Scale to evaluate the system availability, the Presence Questionnaire scale to measure the immersive virtual reality scene, and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire subjective measurement scale for simulator sickness symptoms.

Results

This upper limb rehabilitation system hardware consisted of Head-mounted Display, a control handle and notebook computers. The software consisted of rehabilitation exercises and game modules. A total of 15 patients were tested on this system, all of whom were female. The mean age was 54.73±7.78 years, and no patients were excluded from the experiment because of adverse reactions such as dizziness and vomiting. The System Usability Scale score was 90.50±5.69, the Presence Questionnaire score was 113.40±9.58, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-nausea score was 0.93±1.16, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-oculomotor score was 0.80±1.27, the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire-disorientation score was 0.80±1.27, and the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire total score was 2.53±3.40.

Conclusions

This study fills in the blanks regarding the upper limb rehabilitation of breast cancer patients based on virtual reality technology system usability research. As the starting point of research in the future, we will improve the system’s function and design strictly randomized controlled trials, using larger samples in the promotion, to evaluate its application in breast cancer patients with upper limbs and other physiological functions and the feasibility and effects of rehabilitation.

Risk Factors for Lymphedema After Breast Conservation Therapy and Oncoplastic Reduction

BACKGROUND

Lymphedema is a known complication after the surgical management of breast cancer, yet the incidence is poorly defined after breast conserving therapy and oncoplastic reduction. The primary aim of this study was to define lymphedema incidence in this population. Furthermore, we sought to correlate demographic factors, surgical approach, and complementary treatment modalities with incidence.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively on patients who underwent breast conserving therapy at our institution from 2012 to 2015 with greater than 1 year of follow-up. Patients were excluded if they underwent breast surgery before treatment, completion mastectomy, delayed breast reconstruction, or delayed breast reduction.

RESULTS

Five hundred and eighty-four patients met study criteria with a 11% lymphedema rate. Patients developing lymphedema had higher preoperative body mass index (P = 0.02), larger breast mass resection volume (P < 0.01), higher rate of axillary dissection (P < 0.01), increased rate of adjuvant whole-breast radiation (P = 0.03), supraclavicular radiation (P < 0.01), axillary radiation (P < 0.01), and neoadjuvant medical therapy (P < 0.01). Multivariate analysis showed breast specimen mass, axillary radiation, and neoadjuvant medical therapy, which were associated with lymphedema (P < 0.05). There was no difference in lymphedema incidence between partial mastectomy and oncoplastic reduction cohorts with independent multivariate analyses for each showing axillary radiation and neoadjuvant medical therapy were significantly associated with lymphedema (P < 0.05), although breast specimen mass was not.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated preoperative body mass index, radiation, axillary dissection, and neoadjuvant medical therapy are associated with an increased risk of lymphedema after breast conserving surgery. Oncoplastic reconstruction is not a risk factor for lymphedema.

Patient-Reported Shoulder Morbidity and Fatigue among Breast Cancer Survivors: An Insight from a Tertiary Care Cancer Hospital

Context: Breast cancer is the most common cancer in Indian women with an annual mortality of around 87,000. Treatment for breast carcinoma may lead to swelling of the ipsilateral arm, shoulder stiffness, arm pain, and cancer-related fatigue. Very few centers in India have reported the arm and shoulder morbidity treated in their hospitals. Aims: The aim was to evaluate the predictive factors of arm and shoulder morbidity and fatigue among breast cancer survivors. Settings and Design: This was a retrospective analysis based on a prospectively maintained database. Materials and Methods: Early and locally advanced cases of breast cancer patients were screened for the study during 2015–2018. Eligible participants were invited to fill up the predetermined questionnaire, and their demographic and treatment-related information was accrued from a file archive. Follow-up period was estimated from the date of tissue diagnosis to last contact/time of interview. Results: Shoulder stiffness was the most common complaint followed by arm numbness. Obesity and diabetes played a crucial role in most of the morbidities and fatigue. The median fatigue score was 34, and the median time of appearance of lymphedema was 13 months. Modified radical mastectomy and radiotherapy to axilla were statistically significantly (P = 0.04 and 0.01, respectively) associated with greater shoulder stiffness and arm swelling. Conclusions: Obesity, diabetes, type of surgery, the extent of axillary dissection, and radiation plan are the major predictive factors of arm and shoulder morbidity. Further prospective validation is necessary for future breast cancer survivorship programs.

Feasibility of Prehabilitation Prior to Breast Cancer Surgery: A Mixed-Methods Study

Background

Breast cancer surgery results in numerous acute and long-term adverse outcomes; the degree to which these can be mitigated or prevented through prehabilitation is unknown.

Methods

We conducted a longitudinal, single-arm, mixed-methods study to examine the feasibility of prehabilitation in 22 women undergoing breast cancer surgery. All participants received an individualized exercise prescription including upper quadrant-specific resistance and mobility training and aerobic exercise for the duration of their surgical wait time. Feasibility was assessed by recruitment, adherence, attrition, and intervention-related adverse event rates. An exploratory investigation of intervention efficacy was conducted via a 6-min walk test, upper-quadrant strength and range of motion, volumetric chances associated with lymphedema, and participant-reported quality of life, fatigue, pain, and disability. Outcome assessments were conducted at baseline, prior to surgery, and at six and 12 weeks after surgery. Semi-structured interviews with a subset of participants (n = 5) and health-care providers (H; n = 2) were conducted to provide further insights about intervention feasibility. Qualitative data were analyzed using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic analysis approach.

Results

Recruitment and attrition rates were 62 and 36%, respectively. Average prehabilitation duration was 31 days (range = 7–69 days). Seventy six percent of participants complied with at least 70% of their prehabilitation prescription. There was a clinically significant increase in the 6-min walk distance from baseline to the preoperative assessment (57 m, 95% CI = −7.52, 121.7). The interviews revealed that the intervention was favorably received by participants and HCPs and included suggestions that prehabilitation (i) should be offered to all surgical candidates, (ii) is an avenue to regain control in the preoperative period, (iii) is a facilitator of postoperative recovery, and (iv) is an opportunity to provide education regarding postoperative rehabilitation protocols. A preference for multimodal prehabilitation (including dietetic and psychological counseling) was also highlighted.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that surgical prehabilitation in women with breast cancer is feasible. Data are hampered by study sample size and lack of a control group. Thus, randomized controlled trials to examine prehabilitation efficacy in people with breast cancer, especially interventions employing a multimodal strategy, are warranted.

Cancer Rehabilitation:: Acute and Chronic Issues, Nerve Injury, Radiation Sequelae, Surgical and Chemo-Related, Part 2

Cancer affects millions of individuals, and approximately half will develop functional impairments. Cancers that commonly, either from direct effects or from its treatments, result in functional impairments include breast, head and neck, brain, and spinal cord tumors. There is a plethora of potential impairments including pain, spasticity, dystonia, weakness, and neurogenic bowel or bladder. This article reviews the functional impairments frequently encountered in breast, head and neck, brain, and spinal cord tumors. The authors also discuss management and treatment options incorporated in comprehensive cancer rehabilitation to address these impairments to maximize and maintain function and quality of life.

Mechanical Properties of Muscles around the Shoulder in Breast Cancer Patients: Intra-rater and Inter-rater Reliability of the MyotonPRO

BACKGROUND

Patients with breast cancer typically experience changes in the properties of muscles around the shoulder. However, there is no appropriate evaluation tool for these changes.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective was to investigate the inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of muscle-related parameters measured by the MyotonPRO, a myotonometer device. The secondary objective was to investigate differences in properties of muscle around the shoulder between the mastectomy side and the other side.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional reliability study.

SETTING

Outpatient clinic in a tertiary care university-affiliated hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two patients with breast cancer who underwent mastectomy.

METHODS

Muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity of the pectoralis major (PM), sternocleidomastoid (SCM), and upper trapezius (UT) were measured using the MyotonPRO. Rater 1 performed two sets of measurements with a time interval of 30 minutes to determine intra-rater reliability. Rater 2 performed measurements during the interval between the two sets of rater 1. Reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Bland-Altman analysis. A paired t-test was used to compare muscle properties between the affected and unaffected sides.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Frequency (tone, Hz), stiffness (N/m), and decrement (elasticity).

RESULTS

Intra-rater reliability was excellent (ICC > 0.75, 0.85-0.98) for all parameters of the PM, SCM, and UT in the affected and unaffected upper limbs of patients with breast cancer. Inter-rater reliability was fair to excellent for all parameters except unaffected PM elasticity (ICC = 0.34). There were significant differences in all parameters of the PM between the affected and unaffected sides. There were no significant differences in the parameters of the SCM and UT between the two sides.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that the MyotonPRO device is a feasible tool to quantify PM, UT, and SCM muscle properties (stiffness, tone, and elasticity) in patients with breast cancer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Effect of breast cancer surgery on chest tightness and upper limb dysfunction

This study aimed to investigate the possible changes in anterior chest tightness after breast cancer surgery. We also try to investigate whether anterior chest tightness is associated with upper-limb dysfunction after breast cancer surgery. Eighty-three women who underwent breast cancer surgery were evaluated before and 2 weeks, 3 months, and 9 months after surgery. Anterior chest tightness was measured using the length of the pectoralis minor muscle through 2 methods (length from the coracoid process to the fourth rib and linear distance from the table to the posterior acromion with supine position). Shoulder range of motion and the K-DASH (Korean version of Disability Arm and Shoulder Questionnaire) score were measured to quantify functional performance of upper limb. Anterior chest tightness of patients with breast cancer significantly increased after surgery. Upper limb dysfunction was observed such as reduced shoulder range-of-motion and increased K-DASH score over time. Increase in chest tightness was correlated with shoulder range-of-motion reduction. Chest tightness was not correlated with K-DASH score directly. However, shoulder range-of-motion reduction was significantly correlated with K-DASH score. Chest tightness and upper limb dysfunction increased in breast cancer survivor. Increase in chest tightness after surgery is associated with upper limb dysfunction and careful attention is required.

Obese patients have higher risk of breast cancer-related lymphedema than overweight patients after breast cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

Increasing scientific evidences suggest that body weight is a risk factor for breast cancer-related lymphedema (LE) in breast cancer patients, but many existing studies have yielded inconclusive results. This meta-analysis aims to provide a more precise estimation of the effects of body mass index (BMI) on LE in breast cancer patients.

Methods

Two authors searched independently in the main English-language databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the main Chinese databases, including China National Knowledge Infrastructure and WanFang Data from inception through June 1, 2018 in human. Odds ratios with 95% confidence interval were calculated to evaluate the effect of BMI on LE.

Results

Twelve studies were identified with a total of 8,039 breast cancer patients, including 2102 patients who were suffered from LE; therefore, the total incidence of LE was 26.15%.The meta-analysis results reveal that the odds ratios were 1.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.20 to 1.68] for BMI 25-30 kg/m² versus BMI <25 kg/m² group, 1.39 (95% CI, 1.21 to 1.60) for BMI ≥30 kg/m² versus BMI 25-30 kg/m² group, and 1.84 (95% CI, 1.47 to 2.32) for BMI ≥30 kg/m² versus BMI <25 kg/m² group.

Conclusions

Our results will generate awareness of LE, especially obese patients should pay more attention to LE after breast cancer than overweight patients. Thus, it is necessary and meaningful to distinguish obese from overweight patients.

Future Developments in Neoadjuvant Therapy for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Breast cancer is the 2nd leading cause of cancer-related death in women in the United States. In general, advances in targeted treatment for breast cancer have improved over the last twenty years, except in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtype. TNBC is an aggressive breast cancer subtype with limited treatment options as compared to hormone positive breast cancers. Recently, genomic profiling of TNBC shows promise in aiding clinicians to develop personalized targeted agents. Prioritizing novel molecular-based therapies in the neoadjuvant setting may help investigators understand mechanisms of resistance and ultimately improve patient outcomes in TNBC.

Prevalence and risk factors associated with pain 21 months following surgery for breast cancer

PURPOSE

This study investigated (1) the prevalence of pain following breast cancer treatment including moderate-to-severe persistent pain and (2) the association of risk factors, present 1 month following surgery, with pain at 21 months following surgery. This information may aid the development of clinical guidelines for early pain assessment and intervention in this population.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of core and breast modules of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaire from 121 participants with early breast cancer. The relationships between potential risk factors (subscales derived from the EORTC), measured within 1 month following surgery, and pain at 21 months following surgery were analysed using univariable and multi-variable logistic regression.

RESULTS

At 21 months following surgery, 46.3 % of participants reported pain, with 24 % categorised as having moderate or severe pain. Prevalence of pain was similar between those who underwent axillary lymph node dissection versus biopsy. Univariate logistic regression identified baseline pain (odds ratio (95 % CI): 2.7 (1.1 to 6.4)); baseline arm symptoms (11.2 (1.4 to 89.8)); emotional function (0.4 (0.1 to 0.8)) and insomnia (2.3 (1.1 to 4.7) as significantly associated with pain at 21 months. In multi-variable analysis, two factors were independently associated with pain at 21 months-baseline arm symptoms and emotional subscale scores.

CONCLUSION

Pain is a significant problem following breast cancer treatment in both the early post-operative period and months following surgery. Risk factors for pain at long-term follow-up included arm symptoms and higher emotional subscale scores at baseline.

Usefulness of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography in Monitoring Adhesive Capsulitis After Breast Cancer Treatment.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39:349-355. [PMID: 25700225 DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000222]

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the usefulness of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET/CT) in the monitoring of adhesive capsulitis (AC), a joint problem commonly observed in the upper arm after breast cancer treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 230 patients who underwent F-FDG PET/CT before and after modified radical mastectomy of whom 22 patients were identified as having AC and categorized into 2 groups: with severely and mildly limited range of motion in the shoulder joint. The F-FDG uptake patterns and mean and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVs) were analyzed.

RESULTS

The overall incidence of AC after MRM was 9.57%. The SUVs were significantly higher in patients with severely limited range of motion compared with the other group. There was no association between the SUV and radiotherapy. The F-FDG uptake pattern differed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT is useful in evaluating AC after breast cancer treatment.

Systemic analysis on risk factors for breast cancer related lymphedema

BACKGROUND

To evaluate risk factors for upper extremity lymphedema due to breast cancer surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical studies published on PubMed, Ovid, EMbase, and Cochrane Library from January 1996 to December 2012 were selected.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies were identified, including 12,104 patients. Six risk factors related to the incidence of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment were detected: axillary lymph node dissection (OR=3.73, 95%CI 1.16 to 11.96), postoperative complications (OR=2.64, 95%CI 1.10 to 6.30), hypertension (OR=1.83, 95%CI 1.38 to 2.42), high body mass index (OR=1.80, 95%CI 1.30 to 2.49), chemotherapy (OR=1.38, 95%CI 1.07 to 1.79) and radiotherapy (OR=1.35, 95%CI 1.10 to 1.66). We found significant protective factors for lymphedema: pathologic T classification (OR=0.57, 95%CI 0.36 to 0.91) and stage (OR=0.60, 95%CI 0.39 to 0.93), while some factors, like age, number of positive lymph nodes, number of lymph node dissection, demonstrated no obvious correlation.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary lymph node dissection, postoperative complications, hypertension, body mass index, chemotherapy, radiotherapy are risk factors for lymphedema after breast cancer treatment. Attention should be paid to patients with risk factors to prevent the occurrence of lymphedema.

Incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The body of evidence related to breast-cancer-related lymphoedema incidence and risk factors has substantially grown and improved in quality over the past decade. We assessed the incidence of unilateral arm lymphoedema after breast cancer and explored the evidence available for lymphoedema risk factors.

METHODS

We searched Academic Search Elite, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (clinical trials), and Medline for research articles that assessed the incidence or prevalence of, or risk factors for, arm lymphoedema after breast cancer, published between Jan 1, 2000, and June 30, 2012. We extracted incidence data and calculated corresponding exact binomial 95% CIs. We used random effects models to calculate a pooled overall estimate of lymphoedema incidence, with subgroup analyses to assess the effect of different study designs, countries of study origin, diagnostic methods, time since diagnosis, and extent of axillary surgery. We assessed risk factors and collated them into four levels of evidence, depending on consistency of findings and quality and quantity of studies contributing to findings.

FINDINGS

72 studies met the inclusion criteria for the assessment of lymphoedema incidence, giving a pooled estimate of 16.6% (95% CI 13.6-20.2). Our estimate was 21.4% (14.9-29.8) when restricted to data from prospective cohort studies (30 studies). The incidence of arm lymphoedema seemed to increase up to 2 years after diagnosis or surgery of breast cancer (24 studies with time since diagnosis or surgery of 12 to <24 months; 18.9%, 14.2-24.7), was highest when assessed by more than one diagnostic method (nine studies; 28.2%, 11.8-53.5), and was about four times higher in women who had an axillary-lymph-node dissection (18 studies; 19.9%, 13.5-28.2) than it was in those who had sentinel-node biopsy (18 studies; 5.6%, 6.1-7.9). 29 studies met the inclusion criteria for the assessment of risk factors. Risk factors that had a strong level of evidence were extensive surgery (ie, axillary-lymph-node dissection, greater number of lymph nodes dissected, mastectomy) and being overweight or obese.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that more than one in five women who survive breast cancer will develop arm lymphoedema. A clear need exists for improved understanding of contributing risk factors, as well as of prevention and management strategies to reduce the individual and public health burden of this disabling and distressing disorder.

FUNDING

The National Breast Cancer Foundation, Australia.

Avaliação dos fatores de risco no linfedema pós-tratamento de câncer de mama

A principal complicação tardia no pós-operatório de câncer de mama é o desenvolvimento do linfedema, uma doença crônica, progressiva, geralmente incurável. O aumento do volume do membro pode desfigurar a imagem corporal, assim como aumentar a morbidade física e psicológica da paciente, além de promover significativo prejuízo para as funções. O presente estudo foi desenvolvido por meio de uma revisão sistemática a partir do cruzamento aleatório das palavras-chave: "linfedema", "compensações linfáticas", "sistema linfático", "dissecção axilar", "fatores de risco" e "câncer de mama". Foram selecionados 18 artigos entre os anos de 1979 e 2009, nos quais foram encontrados como principais fatores de risco para o desenvolvimento do linfedema a radioterapia, radioterapia axilar, infecção, dissecção axilar seguida de radioterapia, obesidade, número de linfonodos retirados e comprometidos e agressividade da cirurgia. As formas de compensação linfática após a dissecção axilar, como as anastomoses linfo-linfáticas, podem ser prejudicadas pela formação cicatricial, seroma pós-operatório, radioterapia e exercícios inadequados para reabilitação de ombro no câncer de mama.

Older breast cancer survivors: factors associated with self-reported symptoms of persistent lymphedema over 7 years of follow-up

Lymphedema of the arm is a common complication of breast cancer with symptoms that can persist over long periods of time. For older women (over 50% of breast cancer cases) it means living with the potential for long-term complications of persistent lymphedema in conjunction with the common diseases and disabilities of aging over survivorship. We identified women > or =65 years diagnosed with primary stage I-IIIA breast cancer. Data were collected over 7 years of follow-up from consenting patients' medical records and telephone interviews. Data collected included self-reported symptoms of persistent lymphedema, breast cancer characteristics, and selected sociodemographic and health-related characteristics. The overall prevalence of symptoms of persistent lymphedema was 36% over 7 years of follow-up. Having stage II or III (OR = 1.77, 95% CI: 1.07-2.93) breast cancer and having a BMI >30 (OR = 3.04, 95% CI: 1.69-5.45) were statistically significantly predictive of symptoms of persistent lymphedema. Women > or =80 years were less likely to report symptoms of persistent lymphedema when compared to younger women (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95). Women with symptoms of persistent lymphedema consistently reported worse general mental health and physical function. Symptoms of persistent lymphedema were common in this population of older breast cancer survivors and had a noticeable effect on both physical function and general mental health. Our findings provide evidence of the impact of symptoms of persistent lymphedema on the quality of survivorship of older women. Clinical and research efforts focused on risk factors for symptoms of persistent lymphedema in older breast cancer survivors may lead to preventative and therapeutic measures that help maintain their health and well-being over increasing periods of survivorship.

Decreased muscle strength following management of breast cancer

PURPOSE

To assess whether muscle strength, power and endurance at the affected shoulder were reduced in women treated for breast cancer. Secondly, we assessed whether muscle performance was explained by management or other symptoms.

METHODS

Participants were 40 women (mean +/- SD: 56.7 +/- 11.6 yr) who had completed all treatments for breast cancer at least 6 m previously. We measured dynamic concentric strength at one repetition maximum (1RM), endurance at 90% 1RM, and power through a range of 40-100% 1RM for shoulder protractors, extensors and retractors. Strength and endurance, but not power, were measured for shoulder flexors. Additionally, maximal grip strength, passive shoulder range of motion and arm circumference were measured. Self-reported symptoms were recorded using a questionnaire.

RESULTS

Shoulder protractors (p = 0.011), retractors (p = 0.007), and extensors (p = 0.009), but not flexors, were significantly weaker on the affected side compared to the unaffected side. Muscle power and endurance at the shoulder and grip strength were not impaired. Inter-limb differences in muscle strength were not explained by the surgical and medical management of the cancer. Self-reported weakness correlated poorly with our measures of muscle strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term weakness occurs about the shoulder secondary to treatment for breast cancer. Strategies to prevent weakness need to be considered.

A contemporary, population-based study of lymphedema risk factors in older women with breast cancer

BACKGROUND

We studied potential risk factors for lymphedema in a contemporary population of older breast cancer patients.

METHODS

Telephone surveys were conducted among women (65-89 years) identified from Medicare claims as having initial breast cancer surgery in 2003. Lymphedema was classified by self-report. Surgery and pathology information was obtained from Medicare claims and the state cancer registries.

RESULTS

Of 1,338 patients treated by 707 surgeons, 24% underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 57% axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). At a median of 48 months postoperatively, 193 (14.4%) had lymphedema. Lymphedema developed in 7% of the 319 patients who underwent SLNB and in 21% of the 759 patients who underwent ALND. When controlling for patient age, tumor size, type of breast cancer, type of breast and axillary surgery, receipt of radiation, chemotherapy, and hormonal therapy, and surgeon case volume, the independent predictors of lymphedema were removal of more than five lymph nodes [odds ratio (OR) 4.68-5.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-19.74 for 6-15 nodes; OR 10.50, 95% CI 2.88-38.32 for >15 nodes] and presence of lymph node metastases (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.21-3.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Four years postoperatively, 14% of a contemporary, population-based cohort of elderly breast cancer survivors had self-reported lymphedema. In this group of predominantly community-based surgeons, the number of lymph nodes removed is more predictive of lymphedema rather than whether SLNB or ALND was performed. As more women with breast cancer undergo only SLNB, it is essential that they still be counseled on their risk for lymphedema.

Prognosis of the upper limb following surgery and radiation for breast cancer

The aim of this systematic review was to identify the prevalence and severity of upper limb problems following surgery and radiation for early breast cancer. Additionally, the independent prognostic contribution of radiation, type of breast surgery, type of axillary surgery, age and body mass index (BMI) was evaluated. Searches of electronic databases were conducted to identify articles that reported upper limb and quality of life outcomes after breast cancer surgery and external radiation. Eligible studies for prognosis were longitudinal in design, with > or =95% of patients treated by surgery and radiation that excluded the axilla. Cross-sectional studies were also included for identification of prognostic factors. Where possible, the contribution of independent prognostic factors was analyzed. The review identified 32 relevant studies. Shoulder restriction was reported in between <1% and 67% of participants, lymphedema was reported in between 0 and 34% of participants, shoulder/arm pain was reported in between 9 and 68% of participants and arm weakness was reported in between 9 and 28% of participants. Quality of life was high across studies. Irradiated patients had slightly increased odds of lymphedema (OR = 1.46, 95% CI 1.16-1.84) and shoulder restriction (OR = 1.67, 95% CI 0.98-2.86) compared with non-irradiated patients. For patients undergoing surgery and radiation for breast cancer, the prognosis is good in terms of the upper limb and quality of life. Radiation that excludes the axilla does not appear to be a strong prognostic indicator of adverse upper limb outcomes.

Test-retest reliability of pressure pain threshold measurements of the upper limb and torso in young healthy women

The goal of this study was to determine the intra- and interday reliability of pressure pain thresholds (PPT) in the upper extremity and torso of asymptomatic women. Nineteen healthy women (20-39 years) with no underlying musculoskeletal problems had 3 PPT trials performed on 8 different locations in the upper extremity and torso over 4 consecutive days. The test-retest reliability of PPT values was robust and highly consistent over the 4 days. The PPT intraclass correlations (ICC) were highly consistent and repeatable over the 4 days of testing (day 1: ICC = 0.94; day 2: ICC = 0.96; day 3: ICC = 0.97 and day 4: ICC = 0.96). When compared with baseline measurements obtained on day 1, the PPT values were significantly lower (P < .05) on days 2, 3, and 4 at all 8 locations. Although the PPT test-retest reliability is robust and consistent throughout the 4 days, there appears to be a similar overall decline in the magnitude of the absolute PPT response at each of the 8 locations. A specific explanation for this greater overall sensitivity in PPTs at all 8 locations is lacking; however, a centrally mediated alteration in pressure/pain sensation could contribute to the overall trend observed in this study.

PERSPECTIVE

PPT measurements of the upper limb and torso will be significantly lower with repeated measures over a short period time. A standardized evaluation grid should be included in baseline so as to accurately evaluate the progression in shoulder rehabilitation in women with shoulder dysfunction.

The development of an arm activity survey for breast cancer survivors using the Protection Motivation Theory

Background

Current research evidence indicates that women should return to normal use of their arm after breast cancer surgery. However, it appears some women continue to hold the view that they are supposed to protect their arm from strenuous activities because of the risk of lymphoedema. Many factors contribute to women's perceptions about lymphoedema and their ability to use their affected arm, and it is the aim of this study to explore and understand these perceptions.

Methods/design

A survey, based on the Protection Motivation Theory, has been developed and tested. The survey assesses whether subjective norms, fear and/or coping attributes predict women's intention to use their affected arm. In addition, the survey includes questions regarding cancer treatment and demographic characteristics, arm and chest symptoms, and arm function. Recruitment of 170 breast cancer survivors has begun at 3 cancer treatment sites in Sydney, Australia.

Discussion

This study will identify perceptions that help predict the extent women use their affected arm. The results will also determine whether upper limb impairments arise secondary to over-protection of the affected arm. Identification of factors that limit arm use will enable appropriate prevention and better provision of treatment to improve upper limb outcomes.

Progressive resistance training and stretching following surgery for breast cancer: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Currently 1 in 11 women over the age of 60 in Australia are diagnosed with breast cancer. Following treatment, most breast cancer patients are left with shoulder and arm impairments which can impact significantly on quality of life and interfere substantially with activities of daily living. The primary aim of the proposed study is to determine whether upper limb impairments can be prevented by undertaking an exercise program of prolonged stretching and resistance training, commencing soon after surgery.

Methods/design

We will recruit 180 women who have had surgery for early stage breast cancer to a multicenter single-blind randomized controlled trial. At 4 weeks post surgery, women will be randomly assigned to either an exercise group or a usual care (control) group. Women allocated to the exercise group will perform exercises daily, and will be supervised once a week for 8 weeks. At the end of the 8 weeks, women will be given a home-based training program to continue indefinitely. Women in the usual care group will receive the same care as is now typically provided, i.e. a visit by the physiotherapist and occupational therapist while an inpatient, and receipt of pamphlets. All subjects will be assessed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 6 months later. The primary measure is arm symptoms, derived from a breast cancer specific questionnaire (BR23). In addition, range of motion, strength, swelling, pain and quality of life will be assessed.

Discussion

This study will determine whether exercise commencing soon after surgery can prevent secondary problems associated with treatment of breast cancer, and will thus provide the basis for successful rehabilitation and reduction in ongoing problems and health care use. Additionally, it will identify whether strengthening exercises reduce the incidence of arm swelling.

Trial Registration

The protocol for this study is registered with the Australian Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN012606000050550).

Upper-extremity pain disorders in breast cancer

Upper-extremity pain is a common and debilitating problem for patients with breast cancer. Although there is considerable literature describing symptoms, little is available on the specific disorders responsible for pain and debility in these patients. Cervical radiculopathy, brachial plexopathy, neuropathy, rotator cuff tendonitis, adhesive capsulitis, epicondylitis, postmastectomy syndrome, swelling, and bone metastases are among the common disorders responsible for upper-extremity pain in breast cancer patients.

OVERALL ARTICLE OBJECTIVE

To discuss common upper-extremity pain disorders in patients with breast cancer.

Complications of Breast-cancer Radiotherapy

Although the beneficial effect of postoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer is well documented, this treatment may be related to a number of complications, which may affect patient quality of life and possibly survival. Among significant long-term irradiation sequelae are cardiac and lung damage, lymphoedema, brachial plexopathy, impaired shoulder mobility and second malignancies. The risk of these complications, particularly high with old, suboptimal irradiation techniques, has decreased with the introduction of modern technologies. In this paper, we review the contemporary knowledge on the toxicity of breast-cancer radiotherapy and discuss possible preventive measures.

Two-step axillary operation increases risk of arm morbidity in breast cancer patients

An investigation of the impact of axillary surgery on arm morbidity in patients who underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), axillary clearance in a one-step procedure, and axillary clearance in a two-step procedure, respectively, was performed. Over a period of 2 years 438 patients with invasive breast carcinoma or carcinoma in situ underwent SLNB at our clinic. Of these 393 were interviewed on symptoms of swelling, numbness, pain, reduced strength, reduced mobility and fatigue more than 1 year postoperatively. Using a standardised symptom score system postoperative morbidity was registered and differences between the patients were compared in a logistic regression analysis. Of the 393 patients who received the questionnaire 370 responded (94%). The mean follow-up was 23.5 months (range 12-37). SLNB resulted in significantly lower arm morbidity than axillary clearance. Doing stepwise logistic regression of the data the two-step axillary clearance represented the most important influential factor of the development of arm morbidity symptoms of swelling and numbness.

Impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions 6 and 12 months after breast cancer operation

OBJECTIVE

To describe the impairments of upper body and limbs, activity limitations and participation restrictions 6 and 12 months after operation for breast cancer and to examine the impact of impairments on activity limitations.

DESIGN

A prospective survey 6 and 12 months after operation.

PATIENTS

Ninety-six breast cancer patients.

METHODS

A questionnaire for assessing the impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions was developed.

RESULTS

The most common impairments 6 months after operation were breast and axilla scar tightness, axilla oedema and neck-shoulder pain. At 12-month follow-up the breast scar tightness (p=0.008) and axilla oedema (p=0.023) decreased, and limb ache (p=0.005) increased significantly. The most limiting impairments were axilla oedema and limb numbness 6 months after operation, and at 12-month follow-up axilla oedema. Lifting, carrying and reaching out caused worsening of impairments to more than half of the respondents at 6-month follow-up. Regression analysis showed that many impairments together were determinants of activity limitations and sleep impairment. Participation restrictions were constant. Respondents had not given up participation in activities in the home, but some had abandoned leisure activities and felt that their work ability had decreased.

CONCLUSION

Impairments and their impact on activities were frequent and constant. There is an urgent need for developing rehabilitation protocols for breast cancer patients.

Factors Associated with Arm Swelling after Breast Cancer Surgery

PURPOSE

As life expectancy improves for women with breast cancer, more women will be living with symptoms of lymphedema. This study reports the incidence of arm or hand swelling and associated risk factors in women with invasive breast cancer following surgery.

METHODS

Data were obtained from baseline and follow-up interviews of women with invasive breast cancer (n = 145), and mammography and pathology records. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the probability of developing arm or hand swelling over time. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify risk factors for arm or hand swelling.

RESULTS

Of women in this study, 38% self-reported arm or hand swelling. There was a significantly increased risk of arm swelling if women were under 50 years of age, had axillary node dissection, received chemotherapy, worked outside the home, and had a high household income. There was no association of body weight with swelling. A significantly decreased risk of arm swelling was found in women who were on treatment for high blood pressure. After adjustment for nodal dissection, only age had a significant independent effect.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights two important areas of future research that could reduce the incidence of lymphedema. There is a need to better understand the role that treatment for high blood pressure may play in protecting women from arm edema. Second, the potential effect of weight as a modifiable lymphedema risk factor needs to be studied in more detail in light of the conflicting results of different studies.

Improving supportive care for women with breast cancer in Australia: the challenge of modifying health systems

Although the benefits of many psychosocial support strategies in improving well being in women with breast cancer have been demonstrated, few women receive these programs as part of routine care. This paper provides some recommendations, based on experience in Australia, about how access to evidence-based supportive care strategies might be improved through modification of health systems. It demonstrates the paucity of research about the costs and health service implications of psychosocial support strategies, which is vital to health planning and service delivery change. It outlines the systematic approach taken in Australia to improving psychosocial support nationally by: the development of research reviews; preparation of guidelines about supportive care; implementation of programs to foster the adoption of guidelines through modification of policy, health service delivery and clinician training; and monitoring programs. Coalitions of government, health care professionals and consumers are key to effective lobbying for change. If all women with breast cancer are to receive better supportive care, there is a need for approaches which: refocus the research effort in psycho-oncology; develop more strategic approaches to generating change in health systems and health policy and foster partnerships to advocate for improved resources.

Axilla surgery severely affects quality of life: results of a 5-year prospective study in breast cancer patients

No long-term prospective study has investigated arm morbidity and patient quality of life. It is unclear to what extent breast cancer patients suffer from arm problems, how long such problems affect their lives, and whether quality of life improves as arm problems abate. This prospective cohort study aims to provide data on the clinical factors associated with arm dysfunction, to estimate its prevalence and to relate arm morbidity to quality of life. The Munich Cancer Registry records clinical details of all cancer patients in and around Munich. Quality of life information was provided directly by breast cancer patients (n = 990) over 5 years. Arm morbidity, including movement limitations, swelling and lymph drainage, and quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30) were assessed. Up to 5 years after diagnosis, 38% of patients were still experiencing arm problems (swelling and limited movement). Consistently over the 5 years, quality of life was significantly (p < 0.001) lower for patients with arm difficulties. For those whose arm problems dissipated, quality of life significantly improved (p < 0.01). A logistic regression analysis showed that extent of axilla surgery (p < 0.003), comorbidity (CVD and diabetes) (p < 0.003), employment (p < 0.01), younger age (p < 0.02), and operating clinic (p < 0.05) significantly contributed to arm problems. Axilla surgery should be re-evaluated since arm morbidity has such a profound effect on patient quality of life.