Effects of long-term treatment with GH in the bone mineral density of adults with hypopituitarism and GH deficiency and after discontinuation of GH replacement

Effects of discontinuation of growth hormone replacement in adult GH-deficient patients: a cohort study and a systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) replacement is advocated in adult growth hormone-deficient (GHD) patients to increase bone mass and improve lipid profile, body composition, and quality of life. The long-term effects of discontinuation of rhGh replacement are unknown.

METHODS

This cohort study and systematic review aim to evaluate the long-term metabolic effects of discontinuation of rhGh replacement in adult GHD patients, with a subgroup analyses according to age (< or > 60 years). Data on anthropometry, lipids, glucose, and bone mass density (BMD) were assessed for 3 years after discontinuation.

RESULTS

Cohort study included 64 patients who had discontinued rhGh replacement for >12 months. Fat percentage increased from 31.5±9.5% to 33.8±9.0% (mean difference 2.3, P=0.003). BMI decreased only in subjects <60 years (P=0.014). Glucose, total cholesterol, and LDL-cholesterol levels did not change; however, the percentage of patients on statins increased slightly from 39% to 44%. HDL-C concentration increased only in patients <60 years (mean difference 0.2, P=0.043). Lumbar spine BMD did not change; however, femoral neck BMD and bone turnover markers decreased in subjects <60 years (P=0.001). Systematic review included eight studies (n=166 patients) with a follow-up duration of 6-18 months. Of the Please check the edit of the sentence 'Of the eight studies "'.eight studies, three qualified as low risk of bias and five as having an intermediate risk of bias. None of the studies reported handling of statins, bisphosphonates, and glucose-lowering medication or excluded patients using these medications.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, discontinuation of rhGh replacement resulted in metabolic changes only in patients <60 years after 3 years. Further research warrants to determine the optimal strategies for (dis)continuation of rhGh replacement in adult patients with GHD.

Reviewing the safety of GH replacement therapy in adults

CONTEXT

Systematic data on safety of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adult GH deficiency is lacking.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically describe safety of adult GH replacement therapy on glucose metabolism and long term safety.

DESIGN

A systematic web-based search of PubMed was performed guided by the Standard Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA).

OUTCOME

Randomised controlled trials of ≥3 months and open trials for ≥12 months with more than 50 adult patients (50 patient years, prospective and retrospective) including adverse event reporting as well as articles on mortality primarily on adult onset patients, reporting mortality ratios on GH treated patients, were included for the review.

RESULTS

Based on the defined selection criteria 94 studies were included. The short-term early placebo controlled trials did not demonstrate an increased frequency of diabetes mellitus (DM) and the long-term open studies did not consistently show an increased incidence of DM during GH replacement. The concern that long-term GH replacement might increase the risk of primary cancer, secondary neoplasia after tumour treatment and recurrence of previous tumours was not evident in the study data.

CONCLUSION

Based on available data, short- and long-term adult GH replacement in patients with severe GH deficiency and hypopituitarism is safe. However, the small number of subjects, limitation of long-term of GH treatment data and absence of an adequate control population is still a limitation for the interpretation of these data.

Osteoporosis in pituitary diseases: lessons for the clinic

Osteoporosis is a systemic disease characterized by bone mass and density loss leading to fragility fractures. Osteoporosis due to endocrine disorders is an example of secondary osteoporosis. The harmful effects on bones are common in patients harboring pituitary tumors (acromegaly, prolactinoma, Cushing's disease) and suffering from hypopituitarism. Increased fracture risk and high healthcare costs of fractured patients are their consequences. The coexistence of some of these disorders and hypogonadism results in severe osteoporosis. The influence of the certain diseases, their activity and therapy and accompanying hypogonadism on bone turnover, bone mineral density and fracture incidence is presented.

Pituitary disorders and osteoporosis

Various hormonal disorders can influence bone metabolism and cause secondary osteoporosis. The consequence of this is a significant increase of fracture risk. Among pituitary disorders such effects are observed in patients with Cushing's disease, hyperprolactinemia, acromegaly, and hypopituitarism. Severe osteoporosis is the result of the coexistence of some of these disorders and hypogonadism at the same time, which is quite often.

Effects of recombinant human growth hormone therapy on bone mineral density in adults with growth hormone deficiency: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

GH deficiency is associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. Because the effects of recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy on BMD and bone mineral content have not been systematically investigated, we conducted a meta-analysis of pertinent studies.

DESIGN

A thorough search of the literature (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register) was performed. Relevant studies were divided and analyzed according to their design (randomized/controlled or prospective/retrospective) and duration of rhGH therapy (≤12 months and > 12 months).

RESULTS

Administration of rhGH led to a significant increase in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in randomized/controlled studies of more than 1 year [weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval)] of 0.038 g/cm(2) (0.011-0.065) and 0.021 g/cm(2) (0.006-0.037) at the LS and FN, respectively, and a nonsignificant drop at the same sites in studies of shorter duration. In prospective studies, a significant increase in the LS and FN BMD was obtained. On meta-regression, a negative association was observed between the change in LS and FN BMD and subjects' age and a positive association between the BMD change and treatment duration. In a subgroup analysis, the increase in LS and FN BMD was significant in men [0.048 g/cm(2) (0.033-0.064) and 0.051 g/cm(2) (0.003-0.098), respectively] but not in women.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis suggests a beneficial effect of rhGH replacement on BMD in adults with GH deficiency. This effect is affected by gender, age, and treatment duration. Larger studies are needed to evaluate the effect of rhGH on fracture risk.

Effect of GH/IGF-1 on Bone Metabolism and Osteoporsosis

Background. Growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1) are fundamental in skeletal growth during puberty and bone health throughout life. GH increases tissue formation by acting directly and indirectly on target cells; IGF-1 is a critical mediator of bone growth. Clinical studies reporting the use of GH and IGF-1 in osteoporosis and fracture healing are outlined. Methods. A Pubmed search revealed 39 clinical studies reporting the effects of GH and IGF-1 administration on bone metabolism in osteopenic and osteoporotic human subjects and on bone healing in operated patients with normal GH secretion. Eighteen clinical studies considered the effect with GH treatment, fourteen studies reported the clinical effects with IGF-1 administration, and seven related to the GH/IGF-1 effect on bone healing. Results. Both GH and IGF-1 administration significantly increased bone resorption and bone formation in the most studies. GH/IGF-1 administration in patients with hip or tibial fractures resulted in increased bone healing, rapid clinical improvements. Some conflicting results were evidenced. Conclusions. GH and IGF-1 therapy has a significant anabolic effect. GH administration for the treatment of osteoporosis and bone fractures may greatly improve clinical outcome. GH interacts with sex steroids in the anabolic process. GH resistance process is considered.

Effects of growth hormone withdrawal in obese premenopausal women

OBJECTIVE

We previously reported improved body composition and cardiovascular risk markers plus a small decrease in glucose tolerance with GH administration vs placebo for 6 months to abdominally obese premenopausal women. The objective of this study was to determine whether the effects of GH treatment on cardiovascular risk markers, body composition and glucose tolerance in obese women persist 6 months after GH withdrawal.

DESIGN AND PATIENTS

Fifty abdominally obese premenopausal women completed a trial of rhGH vs placebo for 6 months; thirty-nine women completed a subsequent 6-month withdrawal observation period.

MEASUREMENTS

IGF-I, body composition by CT, (1) H-MRS and DXA, serum cardiovascular risk markers, oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

RESULTS

IGF-I standard deviation scores (SDS) within the GH group were -1.7 ± 0.1 (pretreatment),-0.1 ± 0.3 (after 6 months of GH) and -1.7 ± 0.1 (6 months post-GH withdrawal). Six months after GH withdrawal, total abdominal and subcutaneous adipose tissue, total fat, trunk fat, trunk/extremity fat, hsCRP, apoB, LDL, and tPA were higher than at the 6-month (GH discontinuation) timepoint (P ≤ 0.05). All body composition and cardiovascular risk markers that had improved with GH returned to baseline levels by 6 months after GH discontinuation, as did fasting and 2-h OGTT glucose levels.

CONCLUSION

The effects of GH administration to abdominally obese premenopausal women have a short time-course. The beneficial effects on body composition and cardiovascular risk markers, and the side effect of altered glucose tolerance returned to pretreatment levels after GH withdrawal. There was no suppression of endogenous IGF-I levels, which returned to baseline after GH withdrawal.

Peripheral bone mineral density in correlation to disease-related predisposing conditions in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) often have low bone mineral density (BMD) attributed to primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT). However, in MEN1 patients, other endocrine dysfunctions and conditions such as hypercortisolism, hypogonadism, and GH deficiency due to pituitary manifestation, and surgery on the upper gastrointestinal tract may affect BMD.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In 23 patients with MEN1 (10 females, 13 males; 46±12 yr), BMD was determined by quantitative computed tomography at the forearm (pqCT), compared to a reference population and related to different conditions suspected to affect bone metabolism in MEN1.

RESULTS

In this cohort, Z-score for trabecular BMD was -0.85±1.18 and for total BMD -1.16±1.04. There was a similar trend towards lower BMD in uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism, hypercortisolism, hypogonadism/GH deficiency and the state after surgery at the upper gastrointestinal tract.

CONCLUSIONS

These data while confirming previous observations on reduced BMD in patients with MEN1, however, challenge its only or even predominant association with pHPT. Other conditions such as hypercortisolism, somatotrophic/ gonadotrophic pituitary insufficiency, and previous upper gastrointestinal surgery seem to be factors contributing to the risk of developing osteoporosis.

Body composition and quality of life in adults treated with GH therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the evidence about the efficacy and safety of using GH in adults with GH deficiency focusing on quality of life and body composition.

DATA SOURCES

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science and Scopus through April 2011. We also reviewed reference lists and contacted experts to identify candidate studies.

STUDY SELECTION

Reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, selected randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared GH to placebo.

DATA SYNTHESIS

We pooled the relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) by the random effects model and assessed heterogeneity using the I(2) statistic.

RESULTS

Fifty-four RCTs were included enrolling over 3400 patients. The quality of the included trials was fair. GH use was associated with statistically significant reduction in weight (WMD, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -2.31 kg, -2.66 and -1.96) and body fat content (WMD, 95% CI: -2.56 kg, -2.97 and -2.16); increase in lean body mass (WMD, 95% CI: 1.38, 1.10 and 1.65), the risk of oedema (RR, 95% CI: 6.07, 4.34 and 8.48) and joint stiffness (RR, 95% CI: 4.17, 1.4 and 12.38); without significant changes in body mass index, bone mineral density or other adverse effects. Quality of life measures improved in 11 of the 16 trials although meta-analysis was not feasible.

RESULTS

GH therapy in adults with confirmed GH deficiency reduces weight and body fat, increases lean body mass and increases oedema and joint stiffness. Most trials demonstrated improvement in quality of life measures.

[Growth hormone therapy in adult patients: a review]

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) can frequently be expected in hypopituitarism of adult patients. If GHD is proven by dynamic testing of the somatotrophic axis, growth hormone substitution is useful for improving quality of life, body composition, bone and lipid metabolism, and myocardial function according to the criteria of evidence-based medicine and is admitted by most national health authorities. There are no other reasonable indications for growth hormone treatment in adulthood.

Growth hormone, IGF-I and insulin and their abuse in sport

There is widespread anecdotal evidence that growth hormone (GH) is used by athletes for its anabolic and lipolytic properties. Although there is little evidence that GH improves performance in young healthy adults, randomized controlled studies carried out so far are inadequately designed to demonstrate this, not least because GH is often abused in combination with anabolic steroids and insulin. Some of the anabolic actions of GH are mediated through the generation of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), and it is believed that this is also being abused. Athletes are exposing themselves to potential harm by self-administering large doses of GH, IGF-I and insulin. The effects of excess GH are exemplified by acromegaly. IGF-I may mediate and cause some of these changes, but in addition, IGF-I may lead to profound hypoglycaemia, as indeed can insulin. Although GH is on the World Anti-doping Agency list of banned substances, the detection of abuse with GH is challenging. Two approaches have been developed to detect GH abuse. The first is based on an assessment of the effect of exogenous recombinant human GH on pituitary GH isoforms and the second is based on the measurement of markers of GH action. As a result, GH abuse can be detected with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Testing for IGF-I and insulin is in its infancy, but the measurement of markers of GH action may also detect IGF-I usage, while urine mass spectroscopy has begun to identify the use of insulin analogues.

Investigating the role of the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor (GH-IGF) axis as a determinant of male bone mineral density (BMD)

INTRODUCTION

The GH-IGF axis has profound effects on bone metabolism and may be important in the etiology of idiopathic osteoporosis. Serum IGF-I is often low in men with osteoporosis, which may be attributable to GH hypo-secretion or hepatic GH insensitivity. We studied the GH-IGF axis in depth to look for evidence to support these hypotheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

28 healthy 60- to 70-year-old men with low, intermediate, or normal BMD were studied. GH secretion was measured by overnight urine collection. GH reserve was assessed by exercise and glucagon stimulation tests. Hepatic IGF-I production was investigated using a GH-IGF-I generation test. Data were analyzed using Pearson's correlation coefficient, linear regression, and analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Serum IGF-I was reduced in subjects with low BMD (P = 0.009). There was no difference in GH secretion or reserve between the groups. Overall, GH reserve and IGF-I were positively related but this was attenuated in the low BMD group. However, no statistically significant difference in IGF-I generation capacity between BMD groups was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Men with reduced BMD have low IGF-I but normal GH secretion and reserve. Our data suggested, but could not confirm, hepatic resistance to GH as a mechanism for this association.

Clinical effects of growth hormone on bone: a review

Growth hormone (GH) stimulates bone turnover. Deficiency of GH due to hypopituitarism is related to low bone mineral density and increased fracture risk. GH substitution increases and thus normalizes bone mineral density in these patients, which is one of a number of arguments for GH substitution in hypopituitarism. In contrast, a possible therapeutic use of GH in idiopathic osteoporosis and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is speculative and not established. Reduction of osteoporosis risk is an argument brought up for a use of GH in healthy elderly persons (anti-aging medicine). However, since only very limited data are available yet, this cannot be based on scientific evidence, and there are important concerns about the safety of use of GH in healthy elderly persons.

Ostéoporoses secondaires en médecine interne

INTRODUCTION

The term 'primary' osteoporosis refers to osteoporosis that results from the involutional losses associated with aging and, in women, additional losses related to natural menopause. Osteoporosis that is caused or exacerbated by other disorders or medication exposures is referred to as 'secondary' osteoporosis.

CURRENT KNOWLEDGE AND KEY POINTS

This article describes the major causes and provides a framework for the diagnostic investigation of patients with suspected of having secondary osteoporosis. There are numerous causes of secondary bone loss, including endocrine disorders, disorders of the gastrointestinal or biliary tract, rheumatic diseases, haematological diseases, immobilization, adverse effects of drug therapy, and a wide miscellaneous group.

FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

Secondary osteoporosis is potentially reversible during the treatment of the underlying disease. It must be identified and induce a symptomatic treatment in all cases plus an etiologic treatment when possible.

Growth hormone replacement in adults and bone mineral density: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of GH replacement on bone mineral density (BMD) in adults with GH deficiency (GHD) is uncertain. We carried out a systematic review of randomized trials that compared GH to no active treatment, with BMD as an outcome.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases to identify articles, abstracts and conference proceedings to March 2002. We also checked reference lists in included studies and expert reviews. Two reviewers independently extracted the data on study design and change in BMD. The results of individual trials were combined by fixed effects model meta-analysis using weighted mean difference (WMD) of change in BMD at the lumbar spine (our primary outcome) and other sites.

FINDINGS

Eighteen trials that included 700 patients met the inclusion criteria. Maximum follow-up was for 12 weeks (1 trial), 6 months (14 trials), 12 months (1 trial), 18 months (1 trial) and 24 months (1 trial). Reporting quality of both study design and results was poor. Ten trials (458 subjects) were included in the meta-analysis. We excluded those eight trials from which sufficient data could not be extracted. We found a mean change in BMD, at the lumbar spine with GH treatment, of 0.01 g/cm2 after 6 and 12 months, 0.02 g/cm2 after 18 months and 0.03 g/cm2 after 24 months. Statistical significance at the 0.05 level was just achieved at 6 and 12 months but was significant at 18 and 24 months. These changes are small and may be influenced by bias.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence of a small effect of GH replacement on bone mineral density in adults with GH deficiency. The clinical importance of this is uncertain.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Somatropin for Adult Growth Hormone Deficiency

The beneficial effects of somatropin (growth hormone [GH] replacement therapy) in adults are now established. Long-term somatropin administration in GH-deficient adults improves body composition, muscle strength, quality of life, bone mass and density, and lipoprotein pattern. The extent to which somatropin therapy can also reduce cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in GH-deficient adults remains to be determined. By starting with a low dose of somatropin, which is gradually increased based on clinical response (body composition, well-being, and serum insulin-like growth factor-1 concentration), effective treatment can be achieved with a minimum of fluid-related adverse effects. Thorough long-term monitoring of glucose metabolism, cardiovascular measurements, and underlying pituitary disease, is, however, mandatory.

Osteoporosis in men: pathophysiology, evaluation, and therapy

Osteoporosis is a serious health problem for men. An advance in our understanding of the pathophysiology and treatment of this disorder has resulted in the possibility of a gender-specific approach to screening, diagnosis, and treatment. Here we review the data on osteoporosis in men, discuss controversies regarding whom to screen, whom to treat, and how to treat. Recent treatment data as they relate to men are reviewed, and a clinical treatment algorithm is presented.

Growth hormone and sex steroid effects on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in healthy aged women and men

BACKGROUND

Aging is associated with concomitant declines in activity of the growth hormone (GH) and gonadal steroid axes, and in bone mineral density (BMD), in both sexes. Long-term estrogen replacement slows bone loss and prevents fractures in postmenopausal women, whereas the effects of supplementation of GH or testosterone on bone metabolism and BMD in aged individuals remains uncertain.

METHODS

Using a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study design, we investigated the separate and interactive effects of 6 months of administration of recombinant human GH and/or gonadal steroids on bone biochemical markers and BMD in 125 healthy, older (>65 years) women (n = 53) and men (n = 72) with age-related reductions in GH and gonadal steroids.

RESULTS

In women, administration of GH, but not GH + hormone replacement therapy (HRT), increased serum levels of osteocalcin and procollagen peptide (PICP) and increased urinary excretion of deoxypyridinoline (DPD) crosslinks. Urinary calcium excretion decreased after HRT. In men, GH, and to a greater extent GH + T, increased osteocalcin. GH increased serum PICP, and GH + T increased urinary DPD. Urinary calcium excretion was unaffected by hormone treatment in men. In women, administration of HRT and GH + HRT, but not GH, increased BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal radius. In men, GH + T led to a small decrease in BMD at the proximal radius; there were no other significant effects of hormone administration on BMD.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that short-term administration of HRT exerts beneficial effects on bone metabolism and BMD in postmenopausal women, which are not significantly altered by the coadministration of GH. In andropausal men, T administration to achieve physiologic levels did not result in significant effects on bone metabolism or BMD, whereas GH + T increased one marker of bone formation and decreased one marker of bone resorption. Given the known biphasic actions of GH on bone and the apparent favorable biochemical effects of GH + T in men, the longer-term effects of GH + T on BMD in aged men remain to be clarified.

Currently used growth-promoting treatment of children results in normal bone mass and density. A prospective trial of discontinuing growth hormone treatment in adolescents

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The need for continued GH replacement in patients with childhood-onset GH deficiency (GHD) into adulthood has been recognized. The consequences of discontinuing GH treatment on bone mineralization in adolescent patients with GHD and short stature were examined over a period of 2 years.

PATIENTS

Forty adolescents (aged 16-21 years) treated with GH for more than 3 years and 16 closely matched healthy controls were studied. After a baseline visit, GH treatment was discontinued. The patients were then re-examined with the same protocol after 1 and 2 years. Twenty-one patients had continuing severe GHD into adulthood, while 19 patients were regarded as having sufficient endogenous GH secretion (GHS).

RESULTS

At baseline, there were no differences between the groups in total bone mineral content (BMC) or bone mineral density (BMD). After 2 years without GH treatment, BMC increased similarly in the GHD and GHS groups. BMC of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) increased only in the GHD group. Lumbar spine BMD increased in the GHD and the GHS groups. No changes were observed in the femoral neck region. Biochemical measurements showed that carboxy-terminal cross-linked telopeptide of type I collagen (ICTP) and bone specific alkaline phosphates (ALP) were higher in the GHD and GHS groups at baseline compared with controls. Osteocalcin, carboxy-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PICP), ICTP and ALP decreased during the 2 years off treatment in both the GHD and GHS groups. PICP was also lower after 2 years in the GHD group compared with both the GHS group and controls.

CONCLUSIONS

After discontinuation of GH therapy in adolescents at or near final height, there was a continued increase in BMC and BMD both for adolescents with growth hormone deficiency and for those classified as growth hormone sufficient. These groups did not differ from controls at baseline or after 2 years. In the growth hormone deficiency group, biochemical markers for bone formation decreased to levels below those in the growth hormone sufficient and healthy control groups. Although the number of patients and controls in this study were small, the results indicate that the present treatment of Swedish GH-deficient children to final height results in normal BMD.

The influence of combined parathyroid hormone and growth hormone treatment on cortical bone in aged ovariectomized rats

The influence of combined parathyroid hormone (PTH) and growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone formation and mechanical strength was investigated in femoral middiaphysial cortical bone from 20-month-old ovariectomized (OVX) rats. The animals were OVX at 10 months of age, and at 18 months they were treated daily for 56 days with PTH(1-34) alone (60 microg/kg), recombinant human GH (rhGH) alone (2.7 mg/kg), or a combination of PTH(1-34) plus rhGH. Vehicle was given to OVX control rats. All animals were labeled at day 28 (calcein) and at day 49 (tetracycline) of the treatment period. PTH(1-34) alone gave rise to formation of a new zone of bone at the endocortical surface. rhGH alone caused substantial bone deposition at the periosteal surface without influencing the endocortical surface. Combined PTH(1-34) plus rhGH administration enhanced bone deposition at the periosteal surface to the same extent as that of rhGH alone. However, the combined treatment resulted in a more pronounced formation of new bone at the endocortical surface than was induced by PTH(1-34) alone. Both PTH(1-34) alone and rhGH alone increased the mechanical strength of the femoral diaphysis, and further increase in mechanical strength resulted from combined PTH(1-34) plus rhGH treatment. OVX by itself induced the characteristic increase in medullary cavity cross-sectional area and a minor decrease in the mechanical quality of the osseous tissue.

Should we start and continue growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency?

During the last decade, growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in adults has been described as a clinical syndrome. Central features of this entity include increased fat mass, reduced muscle and bone mass, as well as impaired exercise capacity and quality of life. GH replacement therapy has been initiated on a wide scale, but patients do not profit equally from this expensive therapy. The decision to start and continue GH replacement should be made individually for each patient. An eligible patient should have a clear diagnosis of GHD. In addition, GH replacement therapy should be efficacious. Especially, the unique and valuable effects of GH replacement on exercise performance and quality of life are strong arguments in favour of continuation of therapy. In osteopenic patients, GH replacement increases bone mass. Also, GH induces improvements in the cardiovascular risk profile. However, it has not yet been proved whether GH replacement reduces the incidence of bone fractures and cardiovascular mortality and improves life expectancy. Thus far, long-term physiological GH replacement does not appear to be complicated by adverse effects. Therefore, available evidence warrants continuation of long-term GH replacement therapy in patients with a clear-cut diagnosis of GHD who demonstrate beneficial effects of this therapy, especially with regard to exercise performance and quality of life.