Orthotopic liver transplantation for idiopathic portal hypertension: indications and outcome

Outcomes of Proximal Spleno-Renal Shunt Operations for Idiopathic Portal Hypertension in Tertiary Hospital in the Sub-Sahara

Purpose

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) also known as non-cirrhotic portal hypertension is an entity of hepatic conditions including disorders of blood vessels that leads to portal hypertension (PHT). Current management of PHT includes medical or endoscopic therapy. A proximal spleno-renal shunt (PSRS) operation has been shown to improve the outcomes of patients with IPH with upper gastrointestinal bleeding refractory to medical and endoscopic therapy in high income countries but the same has not been well described in our resource limited setting.

Patients and methods

This study consecutively included patients who were diagnosed with IPH on pre-operative imaging and underwent PSRS surgery. Data on four patients across the time period of 3 years was obtained with a male to female ratio of 1:1 and age range of 7 to 34 years.

Results

All patients in this study had features of upper gastrointestinal bleeding and, after an endoscopy they were all diagnosed with grade IV esophageal varices. Symptom duration prior to admission varied between 3 months to 8 years. All these patients had multiple episodes of rebleeding varices with recurrent admissions and were managed conservatively by multiple blood transfusions and propranolol tablets, pre-operatively. Only one patient had previous variceal band ligation done though he developed rebleeding. All four patients underwent both PSRS surgery and splenectomy and were intra-operatively verified to have a normal smooth liver and thus IPH was the cause of the esophageal varices. After an average follow-up period of 26.5 months, we found that all patients were alive with early symptomatic relief, no recurrent bleeding and no long-term complications.

Conclusion

Good outcomes were achieved in terms of symptom resolution, endoscopic variceal resolution at follow-up endoscopy, length of stay ranging from 8 to 15 days and all four patients were alive at the time of follow-up, that ranged from 14 to 46 months.

Liver Transplantation for Porto-sinusoidal Vascular Liver Disorder: Long-term Outcome

BACKGROUND

Porto-sinusoidal vascular liver disorder (PSVD) is a rare disease that occasionally requires liver transplantation (LT), despite usually presenting preserved liver function. There remains a paucity of data pertaining to LT in PSVD. The aim was to identify features associated with post-LT outcomes in PSVD.

METHODS

Retrospective multicentre study of 79 patients who received LT for PSVD.

RESULTS

Median post-LT follow-up was 37 (range 1-261) mo. Refractory ascites 24 (30%), hepatic encephalopathy 16 (20%), and hepatopulmonary syndrome 13 (16.3%) were the most frequent indications for LT. Hepatocellular carcinoma was the indication in only 2 patients. Twenty-four patients died, 7 due to liver and 17 to non-liver related causes. Post-LT survival was 82.2%, 80.7%, and 68.6% at 1, 2, and 5 y, respectively. Post-LT survival was significantly better in patients without (n = 58) than in those with a persistent severe PSVD-associated condition (n = 21). Pre-LT hyperbilirubinemia levels and creatinine >100 µmol/L were also independently associated with poor survival. Six patients (7.6%) required a second LT. Recurrence of PSVD was confirmed by liver biopsy in only 1 patient and in 3 further patients it was likely.

CONCLUSIONS

LT in PSVD is associated with an acceptable outcome in the absence of associated severe conditions. However, persistence of a severe associated condition, pre-LT high bilirubin levels, or creatinine >100 µmol/L impact outcome, and these are features that should be considered when evaluating PSVD patients for LT. PSVD recurrence is possible after LT and needs to be explored, at least, in cases of posttransplant portal hypertension.

Identifying Patients at High Risk of Developing Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension

The term porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) has been recently proposed to replace the term idiopathic non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) to describe patients with or without signs of portal hypertension and typical histological lesions involving the portal venules or sinusoids in the absence of cirrhosis. According to the new definition, the presence of known causes of liver disease as well as of portal vein thrombosis does not rule out PSVD. Therefore, the patients in whom the diagnosis of PSVD is possible are much more than the patients strictly fulfilling the diagnostic criteria for INCPH. In this setting, the clinical challenge for the hepatologist is to identify patients at risk of developing PSVD and to indicate liver biopsy to confirm the diagnosis. We describe some possible scenarios in which PSVD should always be suspected, and we provide some tools useful to reach the diagnosis of PSVD.

Living donor liver transplantation for idiopathic portal hypertension with extrahepatic portal vein stenosis and splenic artery aneurysms: a case report and review of the literature

Background

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) generally has a good prognosis and rarely results in liver transplantation. Furthermore, there are few reports of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for IPH with extrahepatic portal vein stenosis.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 51-year-old female patient diagnosed with IPH more than 20 years ago. She suffered severe jaundice, massive ascites, and encephalopathy at the time of her visit to our hospital. The patient’s extrahepatic portal vein showed a scar-like stenosis, and the portal flow was completely hepatofugal. Collateral circulation such as the splenorenal shunt was well developed, and multiple splenic artery aneurysms up to 2 cm were observed in the splenic hilum. Her Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score increased to over 40 because of renal dysfunction, requiring temporary dialysis. We performed LDLT using her husband’s right lobe graft and splenectomy. The extrahepatic stenotic portal vein was completely resected, and the superficial femoral vein (SFV) graft collected from the recipient’s right leg was used for portal reconstruction as an interposition graft. Although the clinical course after LDLT had many complications, the patient was discharged on postoperative day 113 and has been fine for 2 years after LDLT. Histopathologically, the explanted liver had obliterative portal venopathy, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal cirrhosis.

Conclusion

This case showed that severe IPH is occasionally associated with extrahepatic portal vein stenosis and can be treated with LDLT with portal vein reconstruction using an interposition graft. It was also suggested that the SFV is a useful choice for the interposition graft.

Causes and Management of Non-cirrhotic Portal Hypertension​

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (NCPH) includes a heterogeneous group of conditions. The aim of this paper is to make an overview on the denominations, diagnostical features and management of porto-sinusoidal vascular disease (PSVD) and chronic portal vein thrombosis (PVT) being the main causes of NCPH in the Western world.

RECENT FINDINGS

The management of NCPH consists in the treatment of associated diseases and of portal hypertension (PH). PH due to PSVD or PVT is managed similarly to PH due to cirrhosis. TIPS placement and liver transplantation are considerable options in patients with refractory variceal bleeding/ascites and with progressive liver failure. Anticoagulation is a cornerstone both in the treatment of thrombosis in PSVD and in the prevention of thrombosis recurrence in patients with portal cavernoma. Physicians should be aware of the existence of PSVD and chronic PVT and actively search them in particular settings. To now, the management of portal hypertension-related complications in NCPH is the same of those of cirrhosis. Large cooperative studies on the natural history of NCPH are necessary to better define its management.

Idiopathic Portal Hypertension

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is a rare disorder characterized by clinical portal hypertension in the absence of a recognizable cause such as cirrhosis. Laboratory tests often reveal a preserved liver function with anemia, leukopenia, and thrombocytopenia due to splenomegaly. Imaging studies reveal signs of portal hypertension, whereas liver stiffness and portal pressure values are usually normal or slightly elevated. Liver biopsy is considered mandatory in order to rule out other causes of portal hypertension, mainly cirrhosis. Liver histology may only show subtle or mild changes, and the definite diagnosis of IPH often requires an expert pathologist and a high-quality specimen. The most frequent clinical presentation is variceal bleeding. Ascites is rarely observed initially, although it may occasionally appear during follow-up. Typical histological findings associated with IPH have been described in patients without portal hypertension, probably representing early stages of the disease. Although the pathophysiology of this entity remains largely unknown, it is frequently associated with underlying immunological disorders, bacterial infections, trace metal poisoning, medications, liver circulatory disturbances, and thrombotic events. The long-term prognosis of patients with IPH, where ascites and the underlying condition are important prognostic factors, is better than in patients with cirrhosis. Treatments that modify the natural history of the disease remain an unmet need, and management of IPH is frequently restricted to control of portal hypertension-related complications.

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia rarely leads to liver transplantation: A 20-year cohort study in all Dutch liver transplant units

BACKGROUND

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is an uncommon liver condition associated with several autoimmune disorders and drugs. The clinical symptoms of nodular regenerative hyperplasia vary from asymptomatic to severe complications of portal hypertension (nodular regenerative hyperplasia-syndrome).

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the prognosis and optimal management, as well as the role of liver transplantation, in nodular regenerative hyperplasia.

METHODS

The pathology databases of all three Dutch liver transplant units were retrospectively scrutinised for explanted livers diagnosed with nodular regenerative hyperplasia or without clear diagnosis. Pre- and post-transplantation clinical, biochemical, radiological and histological information was obtained from electronic and paper records.

RESULTS

In total, 1886 patients received a liver transplant. In 255 patients, nodular regenerative hyperplasia could not be excluded. After detailed chart review, the native livers of 11 patients (0.6%) (82% male, median age: 44 years) displayed nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Seven patients (64%) had underlying disorders or drug exposure which possibly caused nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Laboratory and imaging abnormalities were present in all patients but did not contribute to the diagnosis of nodular regenerative hyperplasia. Five-year survival was 73% (median follow-up: four years, range: 2-248 months).

CONCLUSION

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is a rare finding in patients, predominantly young males, transplanted for end-stage liver disease with unknown aetiology. Nonetheless, liver transplantation may have an important role in end-stage nodular regenerative hyperplasia-syndrome.

Management of hepatic vascular diseases

Primary damage to hepatic vessels is rare. (i) Hepatic arterial disorders, related mostly to iatrogenic injury and occasionally to systemic diseases, lead to ischemic cholangiopathy. (ii) Hepatic vein or inferior vena cava thrombosis, causing primary Budd-Chiari syndrome, is related typically to a combination of underlying prothrombotic conditions, particularly myeloproliferative neoplasms, factor V Leiden, and oral contraceptive use. The outcome of Budd-Chiari syndrome has markedly improved with anticoagulation therapy and, when needed, angioplasty, stenting, TIPS, or liver transplantation. (iii) Extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis is related to local causes (advanced cirrhosis, surgery, malignant or inflammatory conditions), or general prothrombotic conditions (mostly myeloproliferative neoplasms or factor II gene mutation), often in combination. Anticoagulation at the early stage prevents thrombus extension and, in 40% of the cases, allows for recanalization. At the late stage, gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension can be prevented in the same way as in cirrhosis. (iv) Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (or venoocclusive disease), caused by agents toxic to bone marrow progenitors and to sinusoidal endothelial cells, induces portal hypertension and liver dysfunction. Decreasing the intensity of myeloablative regimens reduces the incidence of sinusoidal toxicity. (v) Obstruction of intrahepatic portal veins (obliterative portal venopathy) can be associated with autoimmune diseases, prothrombotic conditions, or HIV infection. The disease can eventually be complicated with end-stage liver disease. Extrahepatic portal vein obstruction is common. Anticoagulation should be considered. (vi) Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is induced by the uneven perfusion due to obstructed sinusoids, or portal or hepatic venules. It causes pure portal hypertension.

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension is associated with poor survival: results of a long-term cohort study

BACKGROUND

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is a rare disease in the Western world. As a result, little is known about the clinical characteristics and outcome of these patients. Survival in these patients is considered to be similar to that of the general population.

AIM

To investigate the clinical manifestations, pathophysiology, outcome and determinants of survival in Western INCPH patients.

METHODS

Multicentre cohort study of INCPH patients.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were followed for a median time of 90 months (range 24-310). Initial manifestations leading to the diagnosis of INCPH were related to portal hypertension in 82% of the patients. Histological signs of portal blood supply disturbances were present in nearly all patients. During follow-up, 12 of 62 patients developed liver decompensation, of which four were considered for liver transplantation. One patient died in the context of variceal bleeding. Hepatocellular carcinoma was not observed during follow-up. A total of 23 patients died during follow-up, only four of them due to liver related mortality. The Kaplan-Meier estimates for overall survival were 100% (95% CI 95-100%), 78% (95% CI 67-89%) and 56% (95% CI 40-72%) at 1, 5 and 10 years respectively. Survival for INCPH was significantly decreased (P < 0.001) compared to survival of the general population. Ascites was an independent predictor of poor outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to the general population, survival in INCPH patients is poor. Mortality is related to associated disorders and medical conditions occurring at older age. Patients rarely die due to liver related complications. Patients with ascites have a poor prognosis.

Liver transplantation for the treatment of nodular regenerative hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is the leading cause of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in Western countries. Although some patients are successfully managed medically or with shunting procedures, others require liver transplantation. The aim of this review was to assess the overall results obtained with liver transplantation and to better define its role in this setting.

METHODS

Systematic review of all published studies on liver transplantation for NRH without language restrictions, in Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases through March 2010.

RESULTS

17 studies including a total of 73 patients were identified; 47 (64.3%) were excluded due to lacking inclusion criteria or clinical data and 26 (35.7%) were analysed. Before liver transplantation, the most frequent clinical presentation was gastroesophageal bleeding (65.3%) followed by ascites (61.5%), hepatic encephalopathy (30.7%) and liver failure (11.5%). The mean follow-up reported after liver transplantation was 30.6±27.6 months and patient and graft survival rate was 78.3%. Only one case reported a NRH recurrence 7 years after liver transplantation (LT).

CONCLUSIONS

Although there are no hard data supporting the role of liver transplantation in symptomatic NRH, onset of severe portal hypertension in this setting may represent a valid indication.

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension

Idiopathic noncirrhotic portal hypertension (INCPH) is characterized by an increased portal venous pressure gradient in the absence of a known cause of liver disease and portal vein thrombosis. In contrast to the high prevalence of this disorder in India, INCPH is a rare disease in the Western world. The etiology of INCPH can be divided in five categories: chronic infections, exposure to medication or toxins, thrombophilia, immunological disorders, and genetic disorders. Multifactorial etiology can also be encountered. Chronic abdominal infection is incriminated as the most important etiological factor in Eastern patients and thrombophilia in Western patients. The majority of patients with INCPH initially present with signs or complications of portal hypertension (mainly variceal bleeding and splenomegaly). These patients usually have preserved liver function. Liver function impairment occurs mainly in the context of intercurrent conditions. Patients with INCPH are often clinically and radiologically misdiagnosed as liver cirrhosis, so that a liver biopsy is indispensable to discriminate cirrhosis from INCPH. Histopathological characteristics of INCPH are heterogeneous, demonstrating overlap between several pathological entities (e.g., hepatoportal sclerosis, nodular regenerative hyperplasia, and incomplete septal cirrhosis). Even though hemodynamical changes in INCPH patients are not comparable to those in cirrhotics, prophylaxis and treatment of variceal bleeding are recommended to be similar. Anticoagulation therapy must be considered only in patients who develop portal vein thrombosis. INCPH has been considered a disorder with a relatively benign disease course. However, liver failure, hepatic encephalopathy, and hepatopulmonary syndrome can occur and are considered indications for liver transplantation.

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia: Evolving concepts on underdiagnosed cause of portal hypertension

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is a rare liver condition characterized by a widespread benign transformation of the hepatic parenchyma into small regenerative nodules. NRH may lead to the development of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. There are no published systematic population studies on NRH and our current knowledge is limited to case reports and case series. NRH may develop via autoimmune, hematological, infectious, neoplastic, or drug-related causes. The disease is usually asymptomatic, slowly or non-progressive unless complications of portal hypertension develop. Accurate diagnosis is made by histopathology, which demonstrates diffuse micronodular transformation without fibrous septa. Lack of perinuclear collagen tissue distinguishes NRH from typical regenerative nodules in the cirrhotic liver. While the initial treatment is to address the underlying disease, ultimately the therapy is directed to the management of portal hypertension. The prognosis of NRH depends on both the severity of the underlying illness and the prevention of secondary complications of portal hypertension. In this review we detail the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, management, and prognosis of NRH.

Obliterative portal venopathy: portal hypertension is not always present at diagnosis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Previous studies on obliterative portal venopathy (OPV) have been biased due to the selection of patients with non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. The aim of this study was to clarify the characteristics of OVP diagnosed by liver biopsy.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients with OPV were retrospectively selected on strict histological criteria. Clinical, laboratory, portal vein patency, and associated disorders potentially involving vascular alterations were analyzed. The occurrence of complications was recorded during follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age at diagnosis was 38.5±15 years old. Initial presentation was portal hypertension (64% of patients) and/or extrahepatic portal vein thrombosis (EHPVT) (22%) or isolated abnormal laboratory tests (20%). Associated diseases found at diagnosis were: prothrombotic disorders (30% of patients) and immune-mediated disorders (17%); 53% of patients had no causal factor (idiopathic OPV). During follow-up (median 8.6 years, range 1-23 years), features of portal hypertension worsened in 46% of patients; EHPVT and portal hypertension were finally found in 44% and 88% of patients. Anti-coagulation and beta-blockers were administered in 47% and 59% of patients, respectively. Severe complications (liver transplantation and/or death) occurred in 11 (19%) patients, 8 had idiopathic OPV. Patients with prothrombotic disorders received earlier anticoagulation therapy; all survived without transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

A confident diagnosis of OPV can be done by biopsy and is conceivable in patients under 40 years without clinically significant portal hypertension. Poor outcome was noted in 19% of patients, most of them affected with idiopathic OPV. Patients with prothrombotic disorders received early anticoagulation and appeared to have a better outcome despite a high proportion of EHPVT.

Non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis related end stage liver disease in adults: evaluation from a study on living donor liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

That non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis (NCPF) can lead to end stage chronic liver disease (CLD) has been convincingly demonstrated only recently after the study of explant livers from clinically cirrhosis cases.

AIMS

This study attempted to determine the frequency of NCPF among adults transplanted for end stage CLD and to identify parameters for a pre-transplant diagnosis of NCPF.

METHODS

Several parameters were analyzed in three categories of cases: pure NCPF (n = 10), overlap NCPF (n = 10), and NAFLD cirrhosis controls (n = 44). Morphologic features of NCPF were looked for in explant livers of all these.

RESULTS

Explant livers in the pure NCPF group were non-cirrhotic and showed histologic features of NCPF. These features were also present in all cases of overlap NCPF in the background of established cirrhosis of other etiologies but absent in the NAFLD cirrhosis controls. Values of seven objective and two subjective parameters showed significant differences between pure NCPF and NAFLD control groups. Compared to NAFLD controls, the model for end stage liver disease (MELD) score, body mass index (BMI), bilirubin, albumin, aspartate amino transferase (AST), and international normalized ratio (INR) were significantly less, whereas variceal grade was higher in the pure NCPF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concludes that in our population, NCPF constitutes about 5% of the subset of end stage CLD considered eligible for liver transplantation (LT), presenting mostly as cryptogenic cirrhosis (CC). A diagnosis of NCPF should be considered when patients presumed to have cryptogenic or other cirrhosis become eligible for LT even in the presence of relatively well-preserved liver function and low MELD scores. End stage CLD manifests at earlier age, when cirrhosis of another etiology supervenes on pre-existent NCPF.

Colon Capsule Endoscopy compared to Conventional Colonoscopy under routine screening conditions

Background

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) has been recently recognized as an emergent cause of liver disease in HIV-infected patients. NRH may cause non-cirrhotic portal hypertension with potentially severe consequences such as refractory ascites, variceal bleeding and hypersplenism. Obliteration of the small intrahepatic portal veins in association with prothrombotic disorders linked to HIV infection itself or anti-retroviral therapy seem to be the causes of NRH and thus the term HIV-associated obliterative portopathy has been proposed.

Case Presentation

Here we describe a case of a HIV-infected patient with biopsy-proven NRH and listed for liver transplantation (LT) because of refractory ascites and repeated upper gastrointestinal bleedings. A transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was placed as a bridge to LT and did not improve liver function. However, anticoagulant therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was associated with rapid improvement in the liver condition and allowed to avoid LT in this patient.

Conclusions

Thus, this case underscores the relation between thrombophilia and HIV-associated NRH and emphasizes anticoagulant therapy as possible treatment.

Pathology and pathogenesis of portal venopathy in idiopathic portal hypertension: Hints from systemic sclerosis

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) is a non-cirrhotic presinuosidal portal hypertension of unknown etiology. Stenosis of smaller portal veins with portal fibrosis is a pathologic hallmark of IPH. Association of systemic sclerosis (SSc) with IPH is recognized, and similar pathologic features are reported in small portal tracts and skin of IPH and SSc, respectively. In addition, levels of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) and connective tissue growth factor are elevated in serum and in affected skin and portal tracts of these two diseases, suggesting that IPH share fibrogenetic mechanisms with SSc. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition (EndMT) of microvasculatures of skin could be responsible for dermal fibrosis in SSc. In IPH, EndMT of portal vein endothelium via TGF-beta/Smad activation may also be involved in small portal venpathy. In IPH, enhanced expression of pSmad2 in venous endothelium of smaller portal veins was associated with reduced CD34 expression. CD34 and S100A4, and CD34 and type I collagen were colocalized to portal vein endothelium in IPH. Such myofibroblastic phenotypes may be responsible for periportal-venous deposition of collagen and compressive portal venous obliteration. These small portal venous lesions may in turn lead to portal venous insufficiency followed by subcapsular atrophy in IPH.

Endothelial to mesenchymal transition via transforming growth factor-beta1/Smad activation is associated with portal venous stenosis in idiopathic portal hypertension

Idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) represents noncirrhotic portal hypertension of unknown etiology, mainly due to stenosis of peripheral portal veins. This study was performed to clarify the mechanism of portal venous stenosis in IPH from the viewpoint of the contribution of the endothelial to mesenchymal transition of the portal vein endothelium via transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1)/Smad activation. In vitro experiments using human dermal microvascular endothelial cells demonstrated that TGF-beta1 induced myofibroblastic features in human dermal microvascular endothelial cells, including spindle cell morphology, reduction of CD34 expression, and induction of S100A4, alpha-smooth muscle actin, and COL1A1 expression, as well as the increased nuclear expression of phospho-Smad2. Bone morphogenic protein-7 preserved the endothelial phenotype of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells. Immunohistochemical analysis showed that endothelial cells of the peripheral portal veins in IPH were characterized by the decreased expression of CD34 and the enhanced nuclear expression of phospho-Smad2; these results also confirmed the expression of S100A4 and COL1A1 in the portal vein endothelium. Serum TGF-beta1 levels in patients with IPH were significantly higher than those of healthy volunteers and patients with chronic viral hepatitis/liver cirrhosis, while an elevation of serum bone morphogenic protein-7 levels was not observed. These results suggest that the endothelial to mesenchymal transition of the portal venous endothelium via TGF-beta1/Smad activation is associated with portal venous stenosis in IPH, and bone morphogenic protein-7 may therefore be a suitable therapeutic candidate for IPH.

Acute deterioration of idiopathic portal hypertension requiring living donor liver transplantation: a case report

Case reports of severe idiopathic portal hypertension (IPH) requiring liver transplantation are very rare. We report the case of a 65-year-old woman who was diagnosed as having IPH. At the age of 60 years, her initial symptom was hematemesis, due to ruptured esophageal varices. Computed tomography of the abdomen showed splenomegaly and a small amount of ascites, without liver cirrhosis. She was diagnosed as having IPH and followed-up as an outpatient. Five years later, she developed symptoms of a common cold and rapidly progressive abdominal distension. She was found to have severe liver atrophy, liver dysfunction, and massive ascites. Living donor liver transplantation was then performed, and her postoperative course was uneventful. Histopathological findings of the explanted liver showed collapse and stenosis of the peripheral portal vein. The areas of liver parenchyma were narrow, while the portal tracts and central veins were approximate one another, leading to a diagnosis of IPH. There was no liver cirrhosis. The natural history of refractory IPH could be observed in this case. Patients with end-stage liver failure due to severe IPH can be treated by liver transplantation.

A new indication for liver transplantation: nodular regenerative hyperplasia in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

Nodular regenerative hyperplasia is one of the causes of noncirrhotic portal hypertension and has recently been described in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients, and the potential role of a prothrombotic state and hepatotoxic antiretroviral medication has been suggested. Moreover, it is now established that liver transplantation is feasible in HIV-infected patients. We describe here our experience concerning 3 HIV-infected patients with severe complications of nodular regenerative hyperplasia treated with liver transplantation.

Liver transplantation for severe intrahepatic noncirrhotic portal hypertension

Intrahepatic noncirrhotic portal hypertension can be idiopathic or associated with known toxic, developmental, vascular, or biliary tract diseases. Most patients are successfully managed medically or with shunting procedures. The goal of this study was to explore the reasons some patients require orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The clinical features, gross and microscopic liver explant pathology, and posttransplantation course in 16 patients who underwent OLT for intrahepatic noncirrhotic portal hypertension were studied. There were 11 men and 5 women with a mean age of 47 years. Clinical manifestations included gastrointestinal varices (n = 12), ascites (n = 8), encephalopathy (n = 3), and hepatopulmonary syndrome (n = 3). Cirrhosis was misdiagnosed clinically, radiographically and/or histologically in 13 patients (81%). Grossly, liver explants weighed a mean of 1,100 g, and 12 had a nodular appearance. Histologically, all 16 livers had portal tract vascular abnormalities, 15 had nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and 9 had incomplete septal cirrhosis. After OLT, mild NRH features were noted in 2 patients, and 1 of these patients developed evidence of portal hypertension. This study demonstrates that a subset of patients with intrahepatic noncirrhotic portal hypertension have severe symptoms requiring OLT. Accurate pre-OLT diagnosis is frequently difficult at advanced stages of the disease; 81% of our patients carried a diagnosis of cirrhosis. Morphologically, the explanted livers showed evidence of vascular abnormalities, NRH, and increased fibrosis, but not cirrhosis. Importantly, however, a diagnosis of cirrhosis is not required in this group of patients to qualify them for OLT, and these patients have good long-term graft function after OLT.

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A