Clinical utility of venoarterial-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) in patients with drug-induced cardiogenic shock: a retrospective study of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organizations’ ECMO case registry

Calcium Channel Blocker Overdose: What Role Does Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Have in Support? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has had increasing prevalence and indications in the last decade. Calcium channel blocker overdose (CCBOD) can lead to significant cardiopulmonary dysfunction and has also increased in recent years. CCBOD results in cardiac depression, vasoplegia, and hyperglycemia. Expert consensus recommends treatment with calcium, high-dose insulin, inotropes, and vasopressors. Our systematic review evaluated when to initiate ECMO in the CCBOD population and the mortality rate associated with use. Electronic literature review identified all relevant studies for CCBOD and ECMO. PRISMA guidelines for systematic review were followed. Three independent authors reviewed abstracts and full texts, and only CCB ingestion without polypharmacy was included. Two authors independently collected data, which included demographics, current medical treatments, ECMO type, and survival. From 314 abstracts, 25 papers were included with a median publication year of 2019. Twenty-six patients were included with an average age of 32.7 years and 42%/58% male/female. Average time on ECMO 4.3 days. VA and VV ECMO use were 92.3% and 7.7%, respectively, and 84.6% of patients survived to hospital discharge. Before ECMO, most patients received 4-5 medical treatments (53.8%). Our systematic review demonstrates ECMO is a newly used, yet valuable therapy for CCBOD when medical treatment fails. Survival to discharge after ECMO for CCBOD is substantially higher than standard VV or VA ECMO. Medical management is still the mainstay therapy for CCBOD, but we show that a persistently unstable patient may benefit from prompt evaluation at an ECMO center for treatment.

Ethylene glycol poisoning requiring veno-arterial ECMO: A case report

Supportive care is the cornerstone of the poisoned patient's treatment, waiting for eventual antidotes to act. We recently treated a case of a severe Ethylene Glycol intoxication with early-onset veno-arterial ECMO. The patient was taken to our Emergency Department with the suspicion of acute cerebrovascular accident, since he was found unconscious at home. The arterial blood gas and blood tests showed a severe metabolic acidosis with high serum lactates and creatinine levels. The cerebral Computed Tomography was negative. The rapid increase in serum lactates suggested Ethylene Glycol intoxication. Although the patient was not in shock yet, arterial and venous introducers were placed in to the femoral vessels so that when the patient showed the first signs of cardiogenic shock, veno-arterial ECMO could be initiated in a very short time. The hemodynamic state progressively improved and V-A ECMO was removed after 16 h of support with complete recovery.

Intensive Care Interventions Among Children With Toxicologic Exposures to Cardiovascular Medications

OBJECTIVES

Interventions requiring a PICU are rare in toxicologic exposures, but cardiovascular medications are high-risk exposures due to their hemodynamic effects. This study aimed to describe prevalence of and risk factors for PICU interventions among children exposed to cardiovascular medications.

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of Toxicology Investigators Consortium Core Registry from January 2010 to March 2022.

SETTING

International multicenter research network of 40 sites.

PATIENTS

Patients 18 years old or younger with acute or acute-on-chronic toxicologic exposure to cardiovascular medications. Patients were excluded if exposed to noncardiovascular medications or if symptoms were documented as unlikely related to exposure.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 1,091 patients in the final analysis, 195 (17.9%) received PICU intervention. One hundred fifty-seven (14.4%) received intensive hemodynamic interventions and 602 (55.2%) received intervention in general. Children less than 2 years old were less likely to receive PICU intervention (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% CI, 0.20-0.86). Exposures to alpha-2 agonists (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.11-3.72) and antiarrhythmics (OR, 4.26; 95% CI, 1.41-12.90) were associated with PICU intervention. In the sensitivity analysis removing atropine from the composite outcome PICU intervention, only exposures to calcium channel antagonists (OR, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.09-4.11) and antiarrhythmics (OR, 4.82; 95% CI, 1.57-14.81) were independently associated with PICU intervention. No independent association was identified between PICU intervention and gender, polypharmacy, intentionality or acuity of exposure, or the other medication classes studied.

CONCLUSIONS

PICU interventions were uncommon but were associated with exposure to antiarrhythmic medications, calcium channel antagonists, and alpha-2 agonists. As demonstrated via sensitivity analysis, exact associations may depend on institutional definitions of PICU intervention. Children less than 2 years old are less likely to require PICU interventions. In equivocal cases, age and exposure to certain cardiovascular medication classes may be useful to guide appropriate disposition.

Extracorporeal cardio-pulmonary resuscitation in poisoning: A scoping review article

Background

Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) represents last-line salvage therapy for poisoning-induced cardiac arrest but no review has focused on this specific area.

Objective

This scoping review sought to evaluate the survival outcomes and characteristics of published cases of ECPR for toxicological arrest, with the aim of highlighting the potential and limitations of ECPR in toxicology.Eligibility Criteria.We searched PubMed and Cochrane for eligible papers from database inception to October 1, 2022 using the keywords "toxicology", "ECLS" and "CPR". References of included publications were searched to identify additional relevant articles. Qualitative synthesis was used to summarize the evidence.

Results

85 articles were chosen: 15 case series, 58 individual cases and 12 other publications that were analyzed separately due to ambiguity. ECPR may improve survival outcomes in selected poisoned patients, although the extent of benefit is unclear. As ECPR for poisoning-induced arrest may have better prognosis compared to from other aetiologies, it is likely reasonable to apply ELSO ECPR consensus guideline recommendations to toxicological arrest.Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest alone may not be sufficient grounds to deny ECPR if effective resuscitation had been promptly instituted. Poisonings involving membrane-stabilizing agents and cardio-depressive drugs, and cardiac arrests with shockable rhythms appear to have better outcomes. ECPR may permit excellent neurologically-intact recovery despite prolonged low-flow time of up to four hours. Early ECLS activation and pre-emptive catheter placement can significantly shorten time-to-ECPR and possibly improve survival.

Conclusion

As effects of poisoning may be reversible, ECPR can potentially support poisoned patients through the critical peri-arrest state.

Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment: circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Circulatory support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is being increasingly used in several critical situations but evidence of its impact on outcomes is inconsistent. Understanding of the specific indications and appropriate timing of implantation of this technology might lead to improved results. Indeed, the line between success and futility may be sometimes very thin when facing a patient in critical condition. New techniques with lighter, simpler and effective devices are being developed. Hence, ECMO has become an accessible technology that is being increasingly used outside of the operating room by heart failure specialists, critical care cardiologists and intensivists. Proper timing of utilization and choice of device may lead to better outcomes. We herein aim to improve this knowledge gap by conducting a literature review to provide simple information, evidence-based indications and a practical approach for cardiologists who may encounter acutely ill adult patients that may be ECMO candidates. This article is part of the Emerging concepts in heart failure management and treatment Special Issue: https://www.drugsincontext.com/special_issues/emerging-concepts-in-heart-failure-management-and-treatment.

Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Drug Intoxication: A Retrospective Comparison of Survivors and Nonsurvivors

Selecting patients most likely to benefit from venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) to treat refractory drug-induced cardiovascular shock remains a difficult challenge for physicians. This study reported short-term survival outcomes and factors associated with mortality in V-A ECMO-treated patients for poisoning. Twenty-two patients placed on V-A ECMO after drug intoxication from January 2014 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint of this study was survival at hospital discharge. Univariate descriptive analysis was performed to compare survivors and nonsurvivors during hospitalization. The overall survival at hospital discharge was 45.4% (n = 10/22). Survival rate tended to be higher in patients treated for refractory shock (n = 7/10) compared with those treated for refractory cardiac arrest (n = 3/12, p = 0.08). Low-flow duration and time from admission to ECMO cannulation were shorter in survivors ( p = 0.02 and p = 0.03, respectively). Baseline characteristics before ECMO, including the class of drugs involved in the poisoning, between survivors and nonsurvivors were not statistically different except pH, bicarbonate, serum lactate, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, and Survival After Veno-arterial-ECMO (SAVE) score. All patients with SAVE-score risk classes II/III survived whereas 85.7% (n = 12/14) of those with SAVE-score risk classes IV/V died. A lactic acid >9 mmol/L predicts mortality with a sensitivity/specificity ratio of 83.3%/100%. V-A ECMO for severe drug intoxication should be reserved for highly selected poisoned patients who do not respond to conventional therapies. Shortening the timing of V-A ECMO initiation should be a key priority in improving outcomes. Low-flow time >60min, lactic acid >9mmol/L, and SAVE-score may be good indicators of a worse prognosis.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Pediatric Toxin Exposures: Review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry

Evidence for the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in children with refractory respiratory failure or shock following ingestion or toxin exposure, has been confined to single-center experiences, individual case reports, and extrapolated from adult cohorts; no pediatric multicenter cohorts exist. The objective of this retrospective review of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry is to describe pediatric ECMO use following ingestion or toxin exposure, and define factors associated with mortality. Twenty-eight children between the ages of 30 days and 18 years met inclusion criteria between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2017. The primary outcome measure was mortality before hospital discharge, which occurred in 32% of patients. Factors associated with in-hospital mortality included pre-ECMO use of inhaled nitric oxide (44.4% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.026), lower pre-ECMO arterial blood gas pH (6.97 [6.80-7.17] vs. 7.20 [7.15-7.32], p = 0.034), and higher pre-ECMO PaCO2 (79 [57-85] vs. 49 [38-63], p = 0.014). Receipt of inotropic support during ECMO was more common in nonsurvivors (66.7% vs. 21.1%, p = 0.035). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered in the most severe pediatric toxin exposures as a bridge to recovery, providing time for both toxin elimination and end-organ recovery.

Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for drug intoxications: A single center, 14-year experience

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY

Acute cardiovascular failure remains a leading cause of death in severe poisonings. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) has been increasingly used as a rescue therapeutic option for those cases refractory to optimal conventional treatment. We sought to evaluate the outcomes after VA-ECMO used for drug intoxications in a single-center experience.

METHODS

We performed an observational analysis of our prospective institutional database. The primary endpoint was survival to hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Between January 2007 and December 2020, 32 patients (mean age: 45.4 ± 15.8 years; 62.5% female) received VA-ECMO for drug intoxication-induced refractory cardiogenic shock (n = 25) or cardiac arrest (n = 7). Seven (21.8%) patients developed lower limb ischemia during VA-ECMO support. Twenty-six (81.2%) patients were successfully weaned after a mean VA-ECMO support of 2.9 ± 1.3 days. One (3.1%) patient died after VA-ECMO weaning for multiorgan failure and survival to hospital discharge was 78.1% (n = 25). In-hospital survivors were discharged from hospital with a good neurological status. Survival to hospital discharge was not statistically different according to sex (male = 75.0% vs. female = 80.0%; p = .535), type of intoxication (single drug = 81.8% vs. multiple drugs = 76.1%; p = .544) and location of VA-ECMO implantation (within our center = 75% vs. peripheral hospital using our Mobile Unit of Mechanical Circulatory Support = 100%; p = .352). Survival to hospital discharge was significantly lower in patients receiving VA-ECMO during on-going cardiopulmonary resuscitation (42.8% vs. 88.0%; p = .026).

CONCLUSIONS

VA-ECMO appears to be a feasible therapeutic option with a satisfactory survival rate and acceptable complications rate in poisonings complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest.

Refractory vasodilatory shock secondary to metformin overdose supported with VA ECMO

•

Metformin overdose can lead to vasodilatory shock refractory to medical management.

•

Extracorporeal circulatory support with venoarterial ECMO is an effective way to manage profound shock associated with metformin overdose.

•

We report the highest recorded serum metformin level in the literature to date.

Metformin overdose may result in vasodilatory shock, lactic acidosis and death. Hemodialysis is an effective means of extracorporeal elimination, but may be insufficient in the shock setting. We present a case of a 39 yo male who presented with hypotension, coma, hypoglycemia, and lactate of 6.5 mmol/L after ingesting an unknown medication. Metformin overdose was suspected, and he was started on hemodialysis. He developed profound vasoplegia refractory to high doses of norepinephrine, vasopressin, epinephrine and phenylephrine. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) was initiated and he had full recovery. Serum analysis with high resolution liquid chromatography mass spectrometry revealed a metformin level of 678 μg/mL and trazodone level of 2.1 μg/mL. This case is one of only a handful of reported cases of metformin overdose requiring ECMO support, and we report the highest serum metformin levels in the literature to date. We recommend early aggressive hemodialysis and vasopressor support in all suspected cases of metformin toxicity as well as VA ECMO if refractory to these therapies.

Objective

We present a case of vasodilatory shock secondary to metformin overdose requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) support. This case is one of only a handful of reported cases of metformin overdose requiring ECMO support, and we report the highest serum metformin levels in the literature to date.

Data sources

University of San Francisco, Fresno.

Study design

Case report.

Data extraction

Clinical records and high resolution liquid chromatography mass spectroscopy analysis.

Data synthesis

None.

Conclusions

Venoarterial ECMO provided an effective means of hemodynamic support for a patient with severe metformin toxicity.

Predicting factors for the need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for suicide attempts by cardiac medication: a single-center cohort study

BACKGROUND

Severe poisoning due to the overdosing of cardiac drugs can lead to cardiovascular failure. In order to decrease the mortality rate, the most severe patients should be transferred as quickly as possible to an extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center. However, the predictive factors showing the need for venous-arterial ECMO (VA-ECMO) had never been evaluated.

METHODS

A retrospective, descriptive, and single-center cohort study. All consecutive patients admitted in the largest ICU of Reunion Island (Indian Ocean) between January 2013 and September 2018 for beta-blockers (BB), calcium channel blockers (CCB), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers, digoxin or anti-arrythmic intentional poisonings were included. ECMO implementation was the primary outcome.

RESULTS

A total of 49 consecutive admissions were included. Ten patients had ECMO, 39 patients did not have ECMO. Three patients in ECMO group died, while no patients in the conventional group died. The most relevant ECMO-associated factors were pulse pressure and heart rate at first medical contact and pulse pressure, heart rate, arterial lactate concentration, liver enzymes and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at ICU-admission. Only pulse pressure at first medical contact and LVEF were significant after logistic regression.

CONCLUSION

A transfer to an ECMO center should be considered for a pulse pressure < 35 mmHg at first medical contact or LVEF < 20% on admission to ICU.

Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An Expert Consensus Statement From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists-Part I, Technical Aspects of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Given ECMO's increased use in adults and the fact that many ECMO patients are cared for by anesthesiologists, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ECMO working group created an expert consensus statement that is intended to help anesthesiologists manage adult ECMO patients who are cared for in the operating room. In the first part of this 2-part series, technical aspects of ECMO are discussed, and related expert consensus statements are provided.

Case Report: Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support for Caowu-Induced Cardiac Arrest

Introduction: Caowu, the main root of the Aconitum plant, is widely used in China. Aconitine is the main toxic component of Aconitum, which can cause a variety of malignant arrhythmias and lead to death. Four patients who developed malignant arrhythmia after drinking medicinal wine containing Caowu were reported in this study. Cardiac arrest occurred soon after symptom onset. All patients received venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support after conservative medical treatment had failed. Patients who were directly transferred to our hospital received VA-ECMO support earlier than patients who were first treated at a local hospital. One patient received hemoperfusion in the emergency room before VA-ECMO support; the other three patients began hemoperfusion after VA-ECMO treatment. Surviving patients who received VA-ECMO earlier after symptom onset showed no obvious neurological complications. The patient who received a longer cardiopulmonary resuscitation time but received hemoperfusion before VA-ECMO had mild neurological complications. The mortality rate was 25% (1 of 4 patients). Two patients had thrombotic complications in venous vessels.

Conclusions: Cardiogenic shock due to refractory ventricular tachycardia caused by aconitine is lethal. Conservative supportive treatment did not provide a short-term antiarrhythmic effect and the cardiogenic shock was not well controlled. VA-ECMO treatment combined with hemoperfusion is promising temporary support to successfully treat aconitine-induced cardiogenic shock caused by refractory ventricular tachycardia.

Intraoperative Management of Adult Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: an Expert Consensus Statement From the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists-Part I, Technical Aspects of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Given ECMO's increased use in adults and the fact that many ECMO patients are cared for by anesthesiologists, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ECMO working group created an expert consensus statement that is intended to help anesthesiologists manage adult ECMO patients who are cared for in the operating room. In the first part of this 2-part series, technical aspects of ECMO are discussed, and related expert consensus statements are provided.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Acute Toxic Inhalations: Case Reports and Literature Review

Previous studies have shown that poisoning is a major threat to human health. Inhalation of acute toxic gas has been linked to serious health consequences. Among the antidotes for poisoning currently used, supportive care is the most common intervention in clinical practice. Severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and/or refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest caused by toxins are associated with high mortality and are difficult to treat. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is an aggressive supportive measure used to manage severely poisoned patients. This study presents two cases of acute toxic gases inhalation, severe ARDS and circulatory instability induced by bromine inhalation, and ARDS induced by nitric acid inhalation which were successfully treated with ECMO. The ECMO techniques used in the animal models and in human cases to treat severe poisoning are described as well as the indications, contraindications, complications, and weaning of ECMO.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in poisoning: a narrative review with clinical recommendations

CONTEXT

Poisoning may lead to respiratory failure, shock, cardiac arrest, or death. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be used to provide circulatory support, termed venoarterial (VA) ECMO; or respiratory support termed venovenous (VV) ECMO. The clinical utility of ECMO in poisoned patients remains unclear and guidelines on its use in this setting are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To perform a literature search and narrative review on the use of ECMO in poisonings. Additionally, to provide recommendations on the use of ECMO in poisonings from physicians with expertise in ECMO, medical toxicology, critical care, and emergency medicine.

METHODS

A literature search in Ovid MEDLINE from 1946 to October 14, 2020, was performed to identify relevant articles with a strategy utilizing both MeSH terms and adjacency searching that encompassed both extracorporeal life support/ECMO/Membrane Oxygenation concepts and chemically-induced disorders/toxicity/poisoning concepts, which identified 318 unique records. Twelve additional manuscripts were identified by the authors for a total of 330 articles for screening, of which 156 were included for this report.

NARRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW

The use of ECMO in poisoned patients is significantly increasing over time. Available retrospective data suggest that patients receiving VA ECMO for refractory shock or cardiac arrest due to poisoning have lower mortality as compared to those who receive VA ECMO for non-poisoning-related indications. Poisoned patients treated with ECMO have reduced mortality as compared to those treated without ECMO with similar severity of illness and after adjusted analyses, regardless of the type of ingestion. This is especially evident for poisoned patients with refractory cardiac arrest placed on VA ECMO (termed extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation [ECPR]).

INDICATIONS

We suggest VA ECMO be considered for poisoned patients with refractory cardiogenic shock (continued shock with myocardial dysfunction despite fluid resuscitation, vasoactive support, and indicated toxicologic therapies such as glucagon, intravenous lipid emulsion, hyperinsulinemia euglycemia therapy, or others), and strongly considered for patients with cardiac arrest in institutions which are structured to deliver effective ECPR. VV ECMO should be considered in poisoned patients with ARDS or severe respiratory failure according to traditional indications for ECMO in this setting.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

Patients with pre-existing comorbidities with low expected survival or recovery. Relative contraindications vary based on each center's experience but often include: severe brain injury; advanced age; unrepaired aortic dissection or severe aortic regurgitation in VA ECMO; irreversible organ injury; contraindication to systemic anticoagulation, such as severe hemorrhage.

CONCLUSIONS

ECMO may provide hemodynamic or respiratory support to poisoned patients while they recover from the toxic exposure and metabolize or eliminate the toxic agent. Available literature suggests a potential benefit for ECMO use in selected poisoned patients with refractory shock, cardiac arrest, or respiratory failure. Future studies may help to further our understanding of the use and complications of ECMO in poisoned patients.

The Surgeon's Role in Cardiogenic Shock

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiogenic shock represents a very challenging patient population due to the undifferentiated pathologies presenting as cardiogenic shock, difficult decision-making, prognostication, and ever-expanding support options. The role of cardiac surgeons on this team is evolving.

RECENT FINDINGS

The implementation of a shock team is associated with improved outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock. Early deployment of mechanical circulatory support devices may allow an opportunity to rescue these patients. Cardiothoracic surgeons are a critical component of the shock team who can deploy timely mechanical support and surgical intervention in selected patients for optimal outcomes.

Emergency department extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may also include noncardiac arrest patients

Background/aim

The primary purpose of this study is to report the experience on the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) process for patients in the critical care unit (CCU) of an emergency department of a tertiary hospital in Turkey, from cannulation to decannulation, including follow-up procedures.

Materials and methods

This retrospective and observational study included eight patients who received ECMO from January 2018 to January 2020. We evaluated the demographics, indications for ECMO, laboratory values, Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction, Survival After Veno-Arterial ECMO and ECMO net scores, the management process, and patient outcomes. Blood gas analyses done after the first hour of ECMO initiation and the reevaluation of the patients’ Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores in the 24th hour of ECMO were recorded.

Results

The mean age was 52.7 ± 14.2 years. The median duration of the ECMO run was 81 (min–max: 4–267) h, and the mean length of CCU stay was 10.2 ± 6.7 days. Of the 8 patients studied, 5 (62.5%) had veno-arterial and 3 (37.5%) had veno-venous ECMO. Three patients were successfully weaned (37.5%). The overall survival-to-discharge rate was 25%. Carbon dioxide levels were significantly decreased 1 h after ECMO initiation (P = 0.038) as well as the need for vasopressors. Lactate levels were lower in decannulated patients. Changes in the APACHE II score were more consistent with the clinical deterioration in patients than SOFA score changes were.

Conclusions

In the early phase of ECMO, vital signs improve, and the need for vasopressors and carbon dioxide levels decrease. Thus, CCUs in Emergency Departments with ECMO capabilities could potentially be designed, and emergency department ECMO algorithms could be tailored for critically ill patients in addition to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation combined with sequential blood purification in the treatment of myocardial damage and cardiac arrest caused by mushroom poisoning

Mushroom poisoning is a common clinical problem. Severe mushroom poisoning often causes liver and kidney failure. Although severe myocardial damage is rare, the fatality rate is extremely high. This case report describes a 56-year-old male suffered severe myocardial damage, multiple organ dysfunction, circulatory failure, recurrent malignant arrhythmia, and cardiac arrest after the ingestion of wild mushrooms. He was administered venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) combined with hemoperfusion, plasma exchange and continuous renal replacement therapy. The heart rhythm gradually stabilized 3 hours after ECMO surgery. On the 6th day after ECMO, heart function recovered. The patient was then weaned from ECMO, and he ultimately recovered and was discharged. In patients with fatal mushroom poisoning leading to refractory arrhythmia and cardiac arrest, early implementation of VA-ECMO combined with sequential blood purification treatment can improve the prognosis and increase the survival rate.

Bail-out extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for hydroxychloroquine intoxication: a warning for COVID-19 health-care givers

This case report describes an intentional intoxication with 18 g of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) presenting with unconsciousness, ventricular dysrhythmias, cardiogenic shock and pulmonary oedema. Initial treatment consisted of sodium bicarbonate, lipid emulsion, diazepam and norepinephrine. Because of persistent cardiogenic shock veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) was successfully used as a bridge to recovery. This case underscores the possible side effects of HCQ and the importance of considering ECMO in cardiogenic shock caused by HCQ intoxication which may occur also in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) based on the currently frequent use of such a compound.

Extracorporeal treatment for calcium channel blocker poisoning: systematic review and recommendations from the EXTRIP workgroup

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are commonly used to treat conditions such as arterial hypertension and supraventricular dysrhythmias. Poisoning from these drugs can lead to severe morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the utility of extracorporeal treatments (ECTRs) in the management of CCB poisoning.

METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature, screened studies, extracted data, summarized findings, and formulated recommendations following published EXTRIP methods.

RESULTS

A total of 83 publications (6 in vitro and 1 animal experiments, 55 case reports or case series, 19 pharmacokinetic studies, 1 cohort study and 1 systematic review) met inclusion criteria regarding the effect of ECTR. Toxicokinetic or pharmacokinetic data were available on 210 patients (including 32 for amlodipine, 20 for diltiazem, and 52 for verapamil). Regardless of the ECTR used, amlodipine, bepridil, diltiazem, felodipine, isradipine, mibefradil, nifedipine, nisoldipine, and verapamil were considered not dialyzable, with variable levels of evidence, while no dialyzability grading was possible for nicardipine and nitrendipine. Data were available for clinical analysis on 78 CCB poisoned patients (including 32 patients for amlodipine, 16 for diltiazem, and 23 for verapamil). Standard care (including high dose insulin euglycemic therapy) was not systematically administered. Clinical data did not suggest an improvement in outcomes with ECTR. Consequently, the EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using ECTR in addition to standard care for patients severely poisoned with either amlodipine, diltiazem or verapamil (strong recommendations, very low quality of the evidence (1D)). There were insufficient clinical data to draft recommendation for other CCBs, although the workgroup acknowledged the low dialyzability from, and lack of biological plausibility for, ECTR.

CONCLUSIONS

Both dialyzability and clinical data do not support a clinical benefit from ECTRs for CCB poisoning. The EXTRIP workgroup recommends against using extracorporeal methods to enhance the elimination of amlodipine, diltiazem, and verapamil in patients with severe poisoning.

Management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning

BACKGROUND

Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis.

METHODS

A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N-acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.

The physiological basis of clinical decision-making in venoarterial extracorporeal life support

Venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal life support (ECLS) or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) as it is commonly known is used in many clinical situations to support both the pumping action of the heart and the gas exchange function of the lungs. This review hopes to refresh, in the mind of the reader, aspects of basic physiological principles that have relevance in VA ECLS therapy. The dynamics of the interaction of the machine with the patient and vice versa plays an important role in clinical outcome. An understanding of the variation from normal physiology imposed both by the machine and the disease process will help make enlightened decisions in the use of this challenging therapy. The key physiological changes during initiation, maintenance, and weaning are discussed as well as certain specific clinical scenarios.

Intoxication and overdose should not preclude veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Introduction

Acute intoxication (AI) related morbidity and mortality are increasing in the United States. For patients with severe respiratory failure in the setting of an acute ingestion, veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) can provide salvage therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with overdose-related need for VV ECMO.

Methods:

We performed a retrospective review of all patients admitted to a specialty VV ECMO unit between August 2014 and August 2018. Patients were stratified by those whose indication for VV ECMO was directly related to an acute ingestion (alcohol, illicit drug, or prescription drug overdose) and those with unrelated diagnoses. Demographics, pre-cannulation clinical characteristics, ECMO parameters, and outcomes data was collected and analyzed with parametric and non-parametric statistics as indicated.

Results:

189 patients were enrolled with 27 (14%) diagnosed with AI. Patients requiring VV ECMO for an AI were younger, had lower median BMI and PaO2/FiO2, and higher RESP scores than non-AI patients (p = 0.002, 0.01, 0.03 and 0.01). There was no difference in pre-cannulation pH, lactate, or SOFA scores between the two groups (p = 0.24, 0.5, 0.6). There was no difference in survival to discharge (p = 0.95). Among survivors, there was no difference in ECMO time or hospital stay (p = 0.24, 0.07).

Conclusion:

We demonstrate no survival difference for patients with and without an AI-related need for VV ECMO. AI patients should be supported with VV ECMO when traditional therapies fail despite potential stigma against acceptance on referral.