Current Practice and Outcomes of Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia and Tracheoesophageal Fistula Repair: A Multi-institutional Analysis in Japan

Retrospective Analysis of Neonatal Surgery at Tottori University over the Past Ten Years

Background

In recent years, the number of neonatal surgeries has been on the rise despite the decline in the number of births, and we examined the actual trends and problems at Tottori University Hospital located in the Sanin region.

Methods

Medical records were retrospectively searched for patients who underwent major surgery during the neonatal period (within 30 days of age) at the Tottori University Hospital over the past 10 years (Jan. 2011 to Dec. 2020).

Results

Sixty-five cases were included. Early birth infants (< 37 gestational weeks) comprised 15 cases (23%) and low birth weight (< 2500 g) infants involved 27 cases (42%). In the latter half (2016-2020), early birth and low birth weight infants were significantly less than in the first half (2011-2015). The common diseases were anorectal malformation (14 cases), esophageal atresia (10), duodenal atresia (10), and diaphragmatic hernia (9). Prenatal diagnosis was obtained in 26 cases (40%), with high diagnostic rate obtained in duodenal atresia (100%), abdominal wall defect (100%), ileal atresia (75%), meconium peritonitis (67%), and diaphragmatic hernia (67%). Fifty-five cases (85%) were operated on within 7 days of age. Other major malformations were associated in 23 cases (35%). There were 6 deaths (9%), of which 3 cases were low birth weight infants with gastrointestinal perforation, 2 cases with severe chromosomal abnormalities (esophageal atresia, omphalocele), and 1 case with diaphragmatic hernia with severe pulmonary hypertension. Home medical care has been required with gastrostomy tube in 2 cases.

Conclusion

Neonatal surgery at Tottori University has been well performed as required with acceptable results along with the progression of other perinatal care. However, further investigation for improvements in premature delivery or organ hypoplasia may be required.

Intraoperative Bronchoscopic Inspection Facilitates Thoracoscopic Repair of Esophageal Atresia with Tracheoesophageal Fistula

Aim: The value of intraoperative bronchoscopic inspection (IBI) for accurate confirmation of the location and distance between the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and the proximal blind end of the esophagus (GAP) was evaluated in Type C esophageal atresia (EA)+TEF. Methods: IBI involved inserting the tip of a bronchoscope into the TEF and a nasogastric tube into the blind end of the EA and measuring GAP with fluoroscopy. EA+TEF patients (n = 23) treated thoracoscopically between 2007 and 2020 were classified according to IBI as IBI+ (n = 16) and IBI- (n = 7) to compare demographics, operative time, and time taken for TEF division. Results: Demographics were similar. Mean time for TEF division (15.4 ± 4.6 minutes for IBI+ versus 38.6 ± 20.9 minutes for IBI-; p < .05) and mean operative time (215.3 ± 48.9 minutes for IBI+ versus 286.4 ± 51.7 minutes for IBI+; p < .05) were significantly shorter. Mean GAP measured radiographically was 0.5 cm (range: 0-1.2 cm); mean GAP measured with IBI was 0.9 cm (range: 0-2.2 cm). Postoperative complications were 3 anastomotic leakages (1/16 in IBI+ and 2/7 in IBI-) that resolved without surgery and 8 strictures (3/16 in IBI+ and 5/7 in IBI-) treated by dilatation. Conclusions: IBI was effective for measuring GAP and is recommended for improving the efficiency of thoracoscopic repair.

Thoracoscopy Approach in Prone Position for Esophagoplasty in Children

Congenital esophageal stenosis (CES) is a very rare clinical condition found in 1 per 25,000 to 50,000 live births. There are three histological types of CES described: tracheobronchial remnants, fibromuscular stenosis (FMS), and membranous stenosis. The first-line treatment in most cases is the conservative treatment (dilatation with a Savary bougie or balloon), but in some CES types, dilatation may be ineffective or result in esophageal perforation with serious complications or lethal outcome. Resection of the stenotic segment and end-to-end esophageal anastomosis was formerly presented as the most common surgical treatment option for CES. However, esophagoplasty is a safe and feasible alternative for surgical treatment of esophageal stenosis in children. Our aim is to report two cases of FMS submitted to thoracoscopic esophagoplasty. Both cases started with dysphagia and refusal after transition to solid diet, at 6 months old, and the radiological examination showed stricture of the distal esophagus. Esophagoplasty was performed with the patients in prone position. The stenotic esophageal wall was incised longitudinally and transverse synthesis was performed. After surgery, the patients had prompt recovery, without recurrent stenosis, remaining asymptomatic, with good diet acceptance.

Esophageal atresia with right aortic arch: An experience of thoracoscopic repair through left thorax

Right aortic arch (RAA) is one of congenital cardiovascular anomalies associated with esophageal atresia (EA). The surgical treatment for EA with RAA is still challenging. Although most pediatric surgeons are familiar with the right-sided approach, the division of the tracheoesophageal fistula and the anastomosis of the esophagus through right thorax are often difficult in cases of RAA. There are a few reports on thoracoscopic repair for EA with RAA. We report a case of EA with RAA treated by left-sided thoracoscopic approach. With left-sided thoracoscopic approach, identification and anastomosis of the esophagus could be safely performed without obstruction by the right-sided descending aorta. There was no leakage or stricture. Thoracoscopic repair of EA with RAA through the left thorax is feasible and safe without obstruction by the right-sided descending aorta.

Thoracoscopic Esophageal Atresia Repair: Outcomes Analysis Between Primary and Staged Procedures

PURPOSE

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia (EA) is analyzed in this systematic review that compares outcomes between primary and staged repairs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed/Embase databases were reviewed for articles on thoracoscopic repair of EA, and articles were selected for primary and staged repairs. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative parts of the study.

RESULTS

Thirty-six articles identified between 1999 and 2019 met the inclusion criteria and offered 776 patients for this analysis. Primary repairs were performed in n=703 and staged repairs in n=73. Comparative analysis showed that esophageal anastomosis was performed using absorbable suture in 88% primary and 78% staged repairs. Anastomotic leak rates were comparable between primary n=65/696 (9%) and staged repairs n=8/73 (11%). The re-fistulation rate was 2% in primary and 1% in staged repairs. There was no difference between suture material and re-fistulation (P>0.05; NS). In primary repairs, nonabsorbable sutures were found to be associated with more leaks than absorbable sutures (P<0.05*). The conversion rate was similar between 2 approaches; primary n=49/680 (7%) and staged n=6/73 (8%); P>0.05. No significant differences were found in the rate of anastomosis strictures between primary n=135/703 (19%) and staged repair n=21/73 (29%); P>0.05. The overall mortality was n=20/703 (3%) in primary and n=1/73 (1%) in staged repairs; P>0.05.

CONCLUSIONS

Successful thoracoscopic primary- and staged-EA repairs have been reported with low rate of complications. Outcomes between primary and staged repairs do not show significant differences with regards to re-fistulation, anastomotic leaks, conversion rates, and mortality.

Thoracoscopic versus conventional open repair of tracheoesophageal fistula in neonates: A short-term comparative study

PURPOSE

Esophageal atresia with or without a tracheo-esophageal fistula is a challenging anomaly in neonates. Thoracoscopic repair is gaining popularity now in pediatric surgery community. The present study aims at comparing the short term outcomes of thoracoscopy versus classic thoracotomy for repair of such conditions.

METHODS

Thirty neonates with tracheoesophageal fistula were randomly divided into two equal groups (n=15) after excluding patients with birth weight <2000g, multiple associated anomalies and cardiorespiratory instability. One group had conventional open repair while the other had thoracoscopic repair. Demographic data, intraoperative result and post-operative findings were recorded and compared between both groups.

RESULTS

Both groups showed similar results regarding demographic and patients' characteristics. Thoracoscopic repair had relatively longer, yet non-significant operative time but with highly significant difference in preserving azygos vein. There was low conversion rate with thoracoscopy (6.66%). Open repair resulted in a longer hospital stay (11.73±5.68 vs 9.2±2.95). Complication rate was comparable in both groups; however, thoracoscopy was associated with better cosmetic results as reported by parents and surgeons (p=0.00).

CONCLUSION

Compared to thoracotomy, thoracoscopic repair offers a less invasive, effective and safe technique with similar short term outcomes, but with superior cosmetic results and better ability to spare azygos vein.

TYPE OF STUDY

Therapeutic/Treatment study LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy for the repair of esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Esophageal atresia (EA) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) require emergency surgery in the neonatal period to prevent aspiration and respiratory compromise. Surgery was once exclusively performed via thoracotomy; however, there has been a push to correct this anomaly thoracoscopically. In this study, we compare intra- and post-operative outcomes of both techniques. A systematic review and meta-analyses was performed. A search strategy was developed in consultation with a librarian which was executed in CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception until January 2017. Two independent researchers screened eligible articles at title and abstract level. Full texts of potentially relevant articles were then screened again. Relevant data were extracted and analyzed. 48 articles were included. A meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between thoracoscopy and thoracotomy in our primary outcome of total complication rate (OR 0.98, [0.29, 3.24], p = 0.97). Likewise, there were no statistically significant differences in anastomotic leak rates (OR 1.55, [0.72, 3.34], p = 0.26), formation of esophageal strictures following anastomoses that required one or more dilations (OR 1.92, [0.93, 3.98], p = 0.08), need for fundoplication following EA repair (OR 1.22, [0.39, 3.75], p = 0.73)-with the exception of operative time (MD 30.68, [4.35, 57.01], p = 0.02). Considering results from thoracoscopy alone, overall mortality in patients was low at 3.2% and in most cases was due to an associated anomaly rather than EA repair. Repair of EA/TEF is safe, with no statistically significant differences in morbidity when compared with an open approach.Level of evidence 3a systematic review of case-control studies.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia (EA) has been performed with increasing frequency over the last two decades, with the expectation of improved outcomes by avoiding thoracotomy. To understand the current practice and outcomes of TR of EA, we reviewed the relevant literature, including 15 case series, 7 comparative studies, and 3 meta-analysis comparing TR with conventional open repair (COR). Most of the studies had a retrospective design and small numbers of patients. Although the evidence level is low because of the lack of prospective studies, this review found that TR is as safe as COR, with comparative outcomes. Moreover, there were several advantages of TR over COR, such as less blood loss and a shorter hospital stay. The long-term outcomes of TR remain unclear because of limited data. Moreover, there is a significant learning curve over the first 10-20 TRs performed. We conclude that TR of EA, when conducted by experienced surgeons, is a safe and minimally invasive alternative to COR and may yield better results than COR in appropriately selected patients.

Impact of congenital heart disease on outcomes after primary repair of esophageal atresia: a retrospective observational study using a nationwide database in Japan

PURPOSE

To verify the association between congenital heart disease (CHD) and postoperative complications after primary repair of esophageal atresia in patients from a Japanese nationwide database.

METHODS

We identified babies in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database who underwent radical surgery for esophageal atresia from 2010 to 2016. We used multivariable logistic regression analyses to evaluate the occurrence of anastomotic leakage and anastomotic stricture.

RESULTS

Among 431 patients who underwent primary anastomosis, 114 patients (27%) had CHD. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 77 patients (17.9%) and stricture in 154 (35.7%). Compared with patients whose anesthetic duration was less than 240 min, those with anesthesia lasting from 240 to 360 min (odds ratio 2.49; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-5.27; p = 0.02) or more than 360 min (odds ratio 4.10; 95% CI 1.69-9.96; p = 0.002) were more likely to experience anastomotic leakage. Male patients had a lower risk of anastomotic stricture than female patients (odds ratio 0.65; 95% CI 0.43-0.9; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

CHD was not associated with anastomotic leakage or stricture. The only significant predictor of anastomotic leakage was duration of anesthesia.

Thoracoscopic esophagoesophagostomy for a refractory stricture in a patient with esophageal atresia

Anastomosis stricture is a well-known complication after esophageal atresia repair. Endoscopic dilatation is the gold standard treatment for esophageal stenosis. However, surgical interventions are indicated for refractory cases. We present a 2-year-old girl with esophageal stricture refractory to regular endoscopic dilatation after esophageal atresia repair that underwent thoracoscopic stricture resection and reanastomosis. Although thoracoscopic approach is widely used for esophageal atresia repair, this approach has not been used before for the treatment of anastomosis stricture.

Location of TEF at the carina as an indicator of long-gap C-type esophageal atresia

We analyzed retrospectively the outcomes in long gap Gross type C esophageal atresia. We hypothesized that outcomes in type C (long gap) atresia differ from type C (normal gap) and be similar with outcomes in Gross type A and B esophageal atresia. Location of the distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) at the carina was chosen as the hallmark of type C atresia (long gap). We compared the type of esophageal repair, major reoperations for anastomotic complications and gastroesophageal reflux, and long-term mucosal changes between type C (normal gap), type C (long gap), and type A/B. We analyzed the hospital charts of 247 successive patients from 1984 to 2014 who either underwent repair of esophageal atresia in our institution (n = 232) or were referred from elsewhere because of anastomotic complications (n = 15). Among the 232 patients of our institution, 181 had type C and 21 type A or B esophageal atresia. Twenty-two (12%) of type C patients had TEF at the carina and were considered as type C (long gap). The referred patients included a disproportionately high number (42%) of patients with type C (long gap). We attempted primary anastomosis in 98% of patients with type C (normal gap), in 95% with type C (long gap), and 53% with type A/B underwent delayed primary anastomosis. Leakage after primary anastomosis occurred in 40% of patients with type A/B and in 23% with type C (long gap) compared with 6% in patients with type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). Recalcitrant anastomotic stricture that eventually required esophageal resection occurred in 30% of patients with type A/B and in 18% with type C (long gap) compared with 3% in patients with type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). The overall rate of major reoperations for anastomotic complications after primary anastomosis, type A/B (36%), type C (long gap) (27%), and antireflux surgery, type A/B (100%) and type C (long gap) (61%) were higher than in type C (normal gap), (9% and 24%), (P < 0.05 in both). Ten (47%) patients with type A/B esophageal atresia (primary anastomosis not possible n = 10), three (14%) with type C (long gap) (primary anastomosis not possible n = 1, significant loss of esophageal length after complications n = 2) and two (1%) with type C (normal gap) (significant loss of esophageal length after complications n = 2) underwent esophageal reconstruction. Endoscopic follow-up, median length 7.0 (IQR: 3.0-14) years, disclosed gastric metaplasia in 31% and 33% of patients with type A/B and type C (long gap) compared with 11% in type C (normal gap) (P < 0.05). Intestinal metaplasia was found in one patient type C (normal gap) (0.7%) and one with type C (long gap) (5.6%), (P = 0.21), only. The outcomes of type C (long gap) esophageal atresia are associated with more frequent complications, gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal mucosal changes than outcomes in type C (normal gap). Outcomes in type C (long gap) esophageal atresia resemble those in type A/B. The percentage of patients who remain with their native esophagus is, however, higher in type C (long gap) atresia (86%) than in type A/B (53%).

Congenital Heart Disease and Its Impact on the Development of Anastomotic Strictures after Reconstruction of Esophageal Atresia

Background

The aim was to explore if severe congenital heart disease (CHD) influenced the need for dilatation of anastomotic strictures (AS) after the repair of esophageal atresia (EA).

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted examining AS in children with EA and Gross type C. The spectra of CHD and cardiac interventions were reviewed. The frequency of dilatations of AS during the first year following EA reconstruction was compared between children with and without severe CHD requiring cardiac surgery during their first year of life. Endoscopic signs of stricture were an indication for dilatation.

Results

Included in the follow-up for AS were 94 patients who had EA reconstructions, of whom 10 (11%) children had severe CHD requiring surgery during the first year including 19 different cardiac interventions. In total, 38 patients needed dilatation of esophageal AS, distributed as six (60%) with severe CHD and 32 (38%) without severe CHD (p = 0.31).

Conclusion

Severe CHD was present in 11% of children with EA. Esophageal AS developed in 60% children with concomitant CHD, but although high, it did not reach statistical difference from children without CHD (38%).

Anastomotic Strictures after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Timing of Dilatation during the First Two Postoperative Years

Background  We determined time frames for dilatation of anastomotic strictures (ASs) occurring during the first 2 years after esophageal atresia (EA) repair. Methods  A retrospective study was conducted on children with EA (Gross type C) who underwent direct repair between January 2008 and March 2015 at a single tertiary center of pediatric surgery. Endoscopic signs of stricture were indications for dilatation because the endoscopy provides more reliable information than X-ray imagining methods. Results  Among our cohort of 49 children with EA, 19 (39%) required at least one esophageal dilatation. All children required initial dilatation within the first year of life and none was older than 1 year during initial dilatation ( p  < 0.01). A median of three dilatations (range: 1-13) took place per patient, with 87% performed during the first postoperative year. The timing of initial dilatation in the first year (< 6 months, 14/19 [74%] vs. 6-12 months, 5/19 [26%]) was predictive of the need for dilatation beyond the first year (9/14 [64%] vs. 0/5 [0%]; p  = 0.03) but not of more numerous dilatations (median, 3 vs. 1; p  = 0.07). Conclusion  The need for dilatation within 6 months postoperatively predicts the need for dilatation after 1 year, but it does not indicate the number of dilatations that will be needed.

Learning curve for the thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula

AIM

Thoracoscopic repair (TR) of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (EA/TEF) remains a considerable challenge, even for the most experienced pediatric surgeons. The aim of this study is to report the outcomes of our experience with TR of EA/TEF and to determine the learning curve for this procedure.

METHODS

Eleven consecutive cases that had undergone TR of EA/TEF at our institutes were included in this study. The medical charts were reviewed retrospectively. To determine the learning curve for TR of EA/TEF, a logarithmic curve-fitting analysis was performed. The data were expressed as medians with ranges.

RESULTS

The median age and birth weight were 1 day (range, 1-3 days) and 2.8 kg (range, 2.5-3.7 kg), respectively. TR was completed in all cases without any complications. The median operative time was 230 min (range, 164-383 min). There were no cases of anastomotic leakage. One patient with a long gap required repeated balloon dilatation for refractory anastomotic stricture. No mortality or recurrence of tracheoesophageal fistula occurred. The operative time was significantly longer in patients with a long gap (>20 mm) than in those with a shorter gap. Once the three cases with a long gap had been excluded, the operative time decreased as the number of treated cases increased. The relationship between the operative time and case number fit a logarithmic function curve well (operative time in minutes = 300 - 62 × log (case number), R²  = 0.8359, P = 0.0015).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that TR of EA/TEF is a safe procedure. It has a considerable learning curve, but requires advanced endoscopic surgical skills.

Comparison of outcomes of thoracoscopic primary repair of gross type C esophageal atresia performed by qualified and non-qualified surgeons

PURPOSE

Although thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia has become widespread, most studies are based on operations performed by expert surgeons. Therefore, the outcomes of operations performed by non-expert surgeons are not well known. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes based on operator skill level.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the demographics and outcomes of patients with Gross type C esophageal atresia, who underwent primary thoracoscopic repair at our hospital between January 2014 and August 2016. Outcomes of surgeries performed by qualified surgeons, as determined by the Japanese Society for Endoscopic Surgery were compared with those of non-qualified surgeons. All operations were performed by or under the supervision of one qualified surgeon.

RESULTS

Nine operations were performed by qualified surgeons and six operations by non-qualified surgeons with >10 years of experience in surgery. None of the patients developed anastomotic leakage or recurrent tracheoesophageal fistula. However, the operative time and rate of stricture formation at the beginning of the weaning period were significantly higher in the latter group (P = 0.008 and 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Although supervision of experts would improve results in thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia, the results indicate that good skill is necessary to avoid anastomotic stricture.

Isolated tracheoesophageal fistula versus esophageal atresia - Early morbidity and short-term outcome. A single institution series

PURPOSE

We compared the postnatal course, morbidity and early results after repair for cases of isolated or "pure" TEF with those for cases of esophageal atresia (EA) with distal tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF).

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive infants were divided into two groups: isolated TEF [TEF group] (n = 5) and EA with distal TEF [EA group] (n = 19).

RESULTS

A high rate of prematurity (29%) and major cardiac and other surgically-relevant malformations (0.8 vs. 0.7 per infant) was found in both groups. The median age at surgery was 8 days for the TEF group vs. 1 day for the EA group (p < 0.01). Most infants of both cohorts had stable acid-base and respiratory parameters at admission. Generally, tracheoscopy provided valuable information regarding the position of the TEF. Surgery for isolated TEF was performed via right cervicotomy in 4 cases and via thoracotomy in one. Postoperative thoracostomy tubes were inserted in 3 cases and one emergency gastrostomy was created for acute gastric overextension (exclusively in patients with EA). The duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation (49 vs. 113 h, p = 0.045) and the median length of stay in the pediatric surgery unit (10 vs. 20.5 days, p = 0.003) were shorter for the isolated TEF group. Four EA patients experienced severe events. Total mortality was 8% (0 out of 5 with TEF vs. 2 out of 19 with EA).

CONCLUSION

Developmental delay and a high rate of morbidity were found in both groups. More complex surgery increased perioperative morbidity in cases of EA. With early recognition of isolated TEF, a less complicated course can be expected in comparison with esophageal atresia.

Multicentre survey on the current surgical management of oesophageal atresia in Belgium and Luxembourg

INTRODUCTION

The surgical management of oesophageal atresia (OA) differs between pediatric surgical teams without consensus. We aimed to describe the current practice of OA treatment in Belgium and Luxembourg and compare this to the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was created and sent to all 18 hospitals (14 pediatric surgical units) performing OA surgery in Belgium and Luxembourg. The results were compared to the literature.

RESULTS

Most units treat an average of 2-5 OA+TOF (71%) and ≤1 pure OA (pOA) per year (86%). The preferred surgical approach for OA+TOF is thoracotomy (86%), mostly extra-pleural (75%). Thoracoscopic OA repair is performed in 21%. All centers perform an end-to-end anastomosis (interrupted sutures), and all leave a transanastomotic tube. A chest drain is routinely used in 8units (57%). In pOA the preferred surgical approach is gastrostomy formation with delayed primary anastomosis (77%). The timing for delayed anastomosis is 2 to 24months. Intra-operative lengthening is mostly attempted with Foker technique (46%). If oesophageal replacement is needed, gastric interposition is mostly used (75%). A postoperative contrast study is routinely performed in 86% for OA+TOF and in 100% for pOA. Anti-reflux medication is routinely prescribed by all units but one.

CONCLUSION

There are still many differences and controversies in the perioperative management of OA. Part of this is based on habits and is difficult to change without scientific evidence. There is a need for prospective (inter)national registries to further identify the existing differences, leading to a more widely accepted consensus.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Anastomotic Strictures after Esophageal Atresia Repair: Incidence, Investigations, and Management, Including Treatment of Refractory and Recurrent Strictures

Improved surgical techniques, as well as preoperative and postoperative care, have dramatically changed survival of children with esophageal atresia (EA) over the last decades. Nowadays, we are increasingly seeing EA patients experiencing significant short- and long-term gastrointestinal morbidities. Anastomotic stricture (AS) is the most common complication following operative repair. An esophageal stricture is defined as an intrinsic luminal narrowing in a clinically symptomatic patient, but no symptoms are sensitive or specific enough to diagnose an AS. This review aims to provide a comprehensive view of AS in EA children. Given the lack of evidence-based data, we critically analyzed significant studies on children and adults, including comments on benign strictures with other etiologies. Despite there is no consensus about the goal of the luminal diameter based on the patient's age, esophageal contrast study, and/or endoscopy are recommended to assess the degree of the narrowing. A high variability in incidence of ASs is reported in literature, depending on different definitions of AS and on a great number of pre-, intra-, and postoperative risk factor influencing the anastomosis outcome. The presence of a long gap between the two esophageal ends, with consequent anastomotic tension, is determinant for stricture formation and its response to treatment. The cornerstone of treatment is endoscopic dilation, whose primary aims are to achieve symptom relief, allow age-appropriate capacity for oral feeding, and reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. No clear advantage of either balloon or bougie dilator has been demonstrated; therefore, the choice is based on operator experience and comfort with the equipment. Retrospective evidences suggest that selective dilatations (performed only in symptomatic patients) results in significantly less number of dilatation sessions than routine dilations (performed to prevent symptoms) with equal long-term outcomes. The response to dilation treatment is variable, and some patients may experience recurrent and refractory ASs. Adjunctive treatments have been used, including local injection of steroids, topical application of mitomycin C, and esophageal stenting, but long-term studies are needed to prove their efficacy and safety. Stricture resection or esophageal replacement with an interposition graft remains options for AS refractory to conservative treatments.

Complications in neonatal surgery

Neonatal surgery is recognized as an independent discipline in general surgery, requiring the expertise of pediatric surgeons to optimize outcomes in infants with surgical conditions. Survival following neonatal surgery has improved dramatically in the past 60 years. Improvements in pediatric surgical outcomes are in part attributable to improved understanding of neonatal physiology, specialized pediatric anesthesia, neonatal critical care including sophisticated cardiopulmonary support, utilization of parenteral nutrition and adjustments in fluid management, refinement of surgical technique, and advances in surgical technology including minimally invasive options. Nevertheless, short and long-term complications following neonatal surgery continue to have profound and sometimes lasting effects on individual patients, families, and society.

Thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula: Basics of technique and its nuances

Aim:

To review the technique of thoracoscopic repair of esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula (TREAT) and results reported in literature and with authors’ experience.

Patients and Methods:

The technique of TREAT was reviewed in detail with evaluation in patients treated at authors’ institution. The patients were selected based on selection criteria and were followed postoperatively. The results available in literature were also reviewed.

Results:

A total of 29 patients (8 females) were operated by TREAT. Mean age was 2.8 days (range 2-6 days). Mean weight was 2.6 kg (range 1.8-3.2 kg). There was a leak in four patients, and two patients had to be diverted. They are now awaiting definitive repair. Twenty-one patients have completed a mean follow-up of 1.5 years and are doing well except for two patients who had a stricture and underwent serial esophageal dilatations. The results from current literature are provided in tabulated form.

Conclusions:

TREAT is now a well-established procedure and currently is the preferred approach wherever feasible. The avoidance of thoracotomy is a major advantage to the newborn and is proven to benefit the recovery in the postoperative patient. The technique demonstrated, and the tweaks reported make the procedure easy and is helpful to beginners. The outcome is very much comparable to the open repair as proven by various series. Various parameters like leak rate, anastomotic stricture are the same. The outcome is comparable if you TREAT these babies well.

Outcomes of thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy for esophageal atresia with tracheoesophageal fistula repair: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A thoracoscopic approach for repair of esophageal atresia (EA) with tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) has become a standard procedure in many pediatric surgical centers. However, whether thoracotomy or thoracoscopy offer advantages in terms of surgical outcomes is not known.

METHODS

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic repair (TR) versus conventional open repair (COR) for EA with TEF.PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched to identify relevant literature until 2016.Studies comparing surgical outcomes of patients undergoing TR versus COR for EA with TEF were reviewed.The quality of each included study was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale score. A fixed or random-effect model was applied depending on heterogeneity tests.

RESULTS

Eight observational clinical studies involving 452 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The meta-analysis of 2 major postoperative complications (leaks and strictures) did not show significant differences between TR and COR. Overall estimates of the odds ratio (OR) of TR versus COR for leaks and strictures were: 1.57 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-3.20; P = 0.22) and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.27-2.97; P = 0.86), respectively. However, meta-analysis of operation time (OR = 19.59, 95% CI = 0.77-38.40, P = 0.04), timing of extubation (OR = -2.50, 95% CI = -3.39 to -1.62, P < 0.001), time to 1st oral feeding (OR = -2.58, 95% CI = -3.79 to -1.36, P < 0.001), and duration of hospital stay (OR = -10.76, 95% CI = -16.39 to -5.12, P < 0.001) showed significant differences.No randomized controlled trial was included, and most studies had small sample sizes and were based on retrospective analysis.

CONCLUSION

TR and COR show a similar complication rates of leaks and strictures for EA/TEF repair. Although associated with a longer operative time, TR has the advantages of an earlier time to extubation and 1st oral feeding, and shorter hospital stay.

Does continuous positive airway pressure for extubation in congenital tracheoesophageal fistula increase the risk of anastomotic leak? A retrospective cohort study

AIM

Immediate post-operative care of tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) and oesophageal atresia (EA) requires mechanical ventilation. Early extubation is preferred, but subsequent respiratory distress may warrant re-intubation. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is a well-established modality to prevent extubation failures in preterm infants. However, it is not favoured in TEF/EA, because of the theoretical risk of oesophageal anastomotic leak (AL). The aim of this study was to find out if post-extubation CPAP is associated with increased risk of AL.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study (2007-2014).

RESULTS

Fifty-one infants underwent primary repair in the newborn period. Median age at surgery was 24 h (interquartile range: 12, 24). In the post-extubation period, 10 received CPAP, whereas 41 did not. The median post-operative day at the commencement of CPAP was 2.5 days (interquartile range: 1, 6 days). Zero out of 10 in the CPAP group and 4/41 in the 'no CPAP' group developed AL on routine post-operative contrast studies (P = 0.57). Zero out of 10 in the CPAP group and 1/41 in the 'no CPAP group' developed recurrence of TEF necessitating re-surgery (P = 1.00). The neonate with recurrent fistula also had coarctation of aorta and needed protracted hospitalisation of 6 months, mainly because of the recurrence of TEF.

CONCLUSION

The use of CPAP in the immediate post-extubation period after corrective surgery for TEF/EA appears to be safe and may not be associated with increased risk of AL or recurrence of the fistula. Information from other centres, surveys and large databases is needed to define the benefits and risks of use of CPAP in these infants.