1
|
Molino AR, Andersen KM, Sawyer SB, Ðoàn LN, Rivera YM, James BD, Fox MP, Murray EJ, D’Agostino McGowan L, Jarrett BA. The Expert Next Door: Interactions With Friends and Family During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Am J Epidemiol 2022; 191:552-556. [PMID: 34618006 PMCID: PMC8513408 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Revised: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic thrust the field of public health into the spotlight. For many epidemiologists, biostatisticians, and other public health professionals, this caused the professional aspects of our lives to collide with the personal, as friends and family reached out with concerns and questions. Learning how to navigate this space was new for many and required refining our communication depending on context, setting, and audience. Some of us took to social media, utilizing our existing personal accounts to share information after sorting through and summarizing the rapidly emerging literature to keep loved ones safe. However, those in our lives sometimes asked unanswerable questions, or began distancing themselves when we suggested more stringent guidance than they hoped, causing additional stress during an already traumatic time. We often had to remind ourselves that we are also individuals experiencing this pandemic, and that our time-intensive efforts were meaningful, relevant, and impactful. As this pandemic and other public health crises continue, we encourage our discipline to consider how we can best use shared lessons from this period, and recognize that our professional knowledge, when used in our personal lives, can promote, protect, and bolster confidence in public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea R Molino
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Correspondence to Andrea R. Molino, Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205 (e-mail: )
| | - Kathleen M Andersen
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Center for Drug Safety and Effectiveness, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Simone B Sawyer
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, George Washington University, Milken Institute School of Public Health, Washington, DC, United States
| | - Lan N Ðoàn
- Department of Population Health Section for Health Equity, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
| | - Yonaira M Rivera
- Department of Communication, Rutgers University School of Communication & Information, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| | - Bryan D James
- Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Epidemiology Research, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, United States
| | - Matthew P Fox
- Departments of Epidemiology and Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Eleanor J Murray
- Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Lucy D’Agostino McGowan
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
| | - Brooke A Jarrett
- Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fox MP, Carr K, D'Agostino McGowan L, Murray EJ, Hidalgo B, Banack HR. Will Podcasting and Social Media Replace Journals and Traditional Science Communication? No, but... Am J Epidemiol 2021; 190:1625-1631. [PMID: 34089048 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwab172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
The digital world in which we live is changing rapidly. The evolving media environment is having a direct impact on traditional forms of communication and knowledge translation in public health and epidemiology. Openly accessible digital media can be used to reach a broader and more diverse audience of trainees, scientists, and the lay public than can traditional forms of scientific communication. The new digital landscape for delivering content is vast, and new platforms are continuously being added. In this article, we focus on several, including Twitter and podcasting, and discuss their relevance to epidemiology and science communication. We highlight 3 key reasons why we think epidemiologists should be engaging with these mediums: 1) science communication, 2) career advancement, and 3) development of a community and public service. Other positive and negative consequences of engaging in these forms of new media are also discussed. The authors of this commentary are all engaged in social media and podcasting for scientific communication, and we reflect on our experiences with these mediums as tools to advance the field of epidemiology.
Collapse
|
3
|
Besançon L, Peiffer-Smadja N, Segalas C, Jiang H, Masuzzo P, Smout C, Billy E, Deforet M, Leyrat C. Open science saves lives: lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodol 2021; 21:117. [PMID: 34090351 PMCID: PMC8179078 DOI: 10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last decade Open Science principles have been successfully advocated for and are being slowly adopted in different research communities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic many publishers and researchers have sped up their adoption of Open Science practices, sometimes embracing them fully and sometimes partially or in a sub-optimal manner. In this article, we express concerns about the violation of some of the Open Science principles and its potential impact on the quality of research output. We provide evidence of the misuses of these principles at different stages of the scientific process. We call for a wider adoption of Open Science practices in the hope that this work will encourage a broader endorsement of Open Science principles and serve as a reminder that science should always be a rigorous process, reliable and transparent, especially in the context of a pandemic where research findings are being translated into practice even more rapidly. We provide all data and scripts at https://osf.io/renxy/ .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lonni Besançon
- Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
- Media and Information Technology, Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden
| | - Nathan Peiffer-Smadja
- Université de Paris, IAME, INSERM, Paris, F-75018 France
- National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit in Healthcare Associated Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Corentin Segalas
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Haiting Jiang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Paola Masuzzo
- IGDORE, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education, Box 1074, Kristinehöjdsgatan 9A, Gothenburg, 412 82 Sweden
| | - Cooper Smout
- IGDORE, Institute for Globally Distributed Open Research and Education, Box 1074, Kristinehöjdsgatan 9A, Gothenburg, 412 82 Sweden
| | | | - Maxime Deforet
- Sorbonne Université, CNRS, Institut de Biologie Paris-Seine (IBPS), Laboratoire Jean Perrin (LJP), Paris, France
| | - Clémence Leyrat
- Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
- Inequalities in Cancer Outcomes Network, Department of Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Korman TM, McMahon JH. Early Outpatient Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19): A Comment. Am J Med 2021; 134:e220-e221. [PMID: 33637180 PMCID: PMC7901364 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2020.08.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Tony M Korman
- Adjunct Clinical Professor, Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Department of Medicine, School of Clinical Sciences at Monash Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Director, Monash Infectious Diseases, Director, Microbiology, Monash Pathology, Monash Health, Clayton Australia.
| | - James H McMahon
- Head of Clinical Research Unit and Infectious Diseases Physician, Department of Infectious Diseases, The Alfred and Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia; Level 2, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Infectious Diseases Physician, Monash Infectious Diseases, Monash Health, Clayton, Australia
| |
Collapse
|