1
|
Rohani R, Malakismail J, Njoku E. Pharmacological and Behavioral Interventions to Mitigate Premature Aging in Patients with HIV. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2023; 20:394-404. [PMID: 37917387 DOI: 10.1007/s11904-023-00677-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We sought to review pharmacological and behavioral interventions that have been publicly presented, published, or are currently ongoing to prevent or mitigate the effect of premature HIV-associated comorbidities. RECENT FINDINGS Multiple studies have been conducted in hopes of finding an effective intervention. While the choice of antiretroviral regimen influences recovery of immune function, several drugs used as adjunct treatments have proven effective to mitigate premature aging. Additionally, few behavioral interventions have exhibited some efficacy. Statins, angiotensin-receptor blockers, and anti-hyperglycemic agents as well as optimal adherence, exercise, and intermittent fasting among others have had beneficial impact on markers of immune activation and levels of inflammatory biomarkers. However, several investigations had inconclusive outcomes so further studies with larger sample sizes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxane Rohani
- Discipline of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, 3333 Green Bay Road BSB 3.266, North Chicago, IL, USA.
- Department of Pharmacy, Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Jacob Malakismail
- Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Emmanuel Njoku
- Section of Infectious Disease, Captain James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center, North Chicago, IL, USA
- Discipline of Internal Medicine, Chicago Medical School, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Serra A, Mozgunov P, Jaki T. A Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage clinical trial design incorporating information about treatment ordering. Stat Med 2023; 42:2841-2854. [PMID: 37158302 PMCID: PMC10962588 DOI: 10.1002/sim.9752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2022] [Revised: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Multi-Arm Multi-Stage (MAMS) designs can notably improve efficiency in later stages of drug development, but they can be suboptimal when an order in the effects of the arms can be assumed. In this work, we propose a Bayesian multi-arm multi-stage trial design that selects all promising treatments with high probability and can efficiently incorporate information about the order in the treatment effects as well as incorporate prior knowledge on the treatments. A distinguishing feature of the proposed design is that it allows taking into account the uncertainty of the treatment effect order assumption and does not assume any parametric arm-response model. The design can provide control of the family-wise error rate under specific values of the control mean and we illustrate its operating characteristics in a study of symptomatic asthma. Via simulations, we compare the novel Bayesian design with frequentist multi-arm multi-stage designs and a frequentist order restricted design that does not account for the order uncertainty and demonstrate the gains in the sample sizes the proposed design can provide. We also find that the proposed design is robust to violations of the assumptions on the order.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pavel Mozgunov
- MRC Biostatistics UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- MRC Biostatistics UnitUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- Faculty for Informatics and Data ScienceUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Judge C, Murphy R, Reddin C, Cormican S, Smyth A, O'Halloran M, O'Donnell MJ. Trends in Adaptive Design Methods in Dialysis Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review. Kidney Med 2021; 3:925-41. [PMID: 34939002 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Adaptive design methods are intended to improve the efficiency of clinical trials and are relevant to evaluating interventions in dialysis populations. We sought to determine the use of adaptive designs in dialysis clinical trials and quantify trends in their use over time. Study Design We completed a novel full-text systematic review that used a machine learning classifier (RobotSearch) for filtering randomized controlled trials and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Setting & Study Populations We searched MEDLINE (PubMed) and ClinicalTrials.gov using sensitive dialysis search terms. Selection Criteria for Studies We included all randomized clinical trials with patients receiving dialysis or clinical trials with dialysis as a primary or secondary outcome. There was no restriction of disease type or intervention type. Data Extraction & Analytical Approach We performed a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a completed a narrative synthesis of the data. Results 57 studies, available as 68 articles and 7 ClinicalTrials.gov summaries, were included after full-text review (initial search, 209,033 PubMed abstracts and 6,002 ClinicalTrials.gov summaries). 31 studies were conducted in a dialysis population and 26 studies included dialysis as a primary or secondary outcome. Although the absolute number of adaptive design methods is increasing over time, the relative use of adaptive design methods in dialysis trials is decreasing over time (6.12% in 2009 to 0.43% in 2019, with a mean of 1.82%). Group sequential designs were the most common type of adaptive design method used. Adaptive design methods affected the conduct of 50.9% of trials, most commonly resulting in stopping early for futility (41.2%) and early stopping for safety (23.5%). Acute kidney injury was studied in 32 trials (56.1%), kidney failure requiring dialysis was studied in 24 trials (42.1%), and chronic kidney disease was studied in 1 trial (1.75%). 27 studies (47.4%) were supported by public funding. 44 studies (77.2%) did not report their adaptive design method in the title or abstract and would not be detected by a standard systematic review. Limitations We limited our search to 2 databases (PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov) due to the scale of studies sourced (209,033 and 6,002 results, respectively). Conclusions Adaptive design methods are used in dialysis trials but there has been a decline in their relative use over time.
Collapse
|
4
|
Garcia-Mesa Y, Xu HN, Vance P, Gruenewald AL, Garza R, Midkiff C, Alvarez-Hernandez X, Irwin DJ, Gill AJ, Kolson DL. Dimethyl Fumarate, an Approved Multiple Sclerosis Treatment, Reduces Brain Oxidative Stress in SIV-Infected Rhesus Macaques: Potential Therapeutic Repurposing for HIV Neuroprotection. Antioxidants (Basel) 2021; 10:416. [PMID: 33803289 DOI: 10.3390/antiox10030416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF), an antioxidant/anti-inflammatory drug approved for the treatment of multiple sclerosis, induces antioxidant enzymes, in part through transcriptional upregulation. We hypothesized that DMF administration to simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV)-infected rhesus macaques would induce antioxidant enzyme expression and reduce oxidative injury and inflammation throughout the brain. Nine SIV-infected, CD8+-T-lymphocyte-depleted rhesus macaques were studied. Five received oral DMF prior to the SIV infection and through to the necropsy day. Protein expression was analyzed in 11 brain regions, as well as the thymus, liver, and spleen, using Western blot and immunohistochemistry for antioxidant, inflammatory, and neuronal proteins. Additionally, oxidative stress was determined in brain sections using immunohistochemistry (8-OHdG, 3NT) and optical redox imaging of oxidized flavoproteins containing flavin adenine dinucleotide (Fp) and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH). The DMF treatment was associated with no changes in virus replication; higher expressions of the antioxidant enzymes NQO1, GPX1, and HO-1 in the brain and PRDX1 and HO-2 in the spleen; lower levels of 8-OHdG and 3NT; a lower optical redox ratio. The DMF treatment was also associated with increased expressions of cell-adhesion molecules (VCAM-1, ICAM-1) and no changes in HLA-DR, CD68, GFAP, NFL, or synaptic proteins. The concordantly increased brain antioxidant enzyme expressions and reduced oxidative stress in DMF-treated SIV-infected macaques suggest that DMF could limit oxidative stress throughout the brain through effective induction of the endogenous antioxidant response. We propose that DMF could potentially induce neuroprotective brain responses in persons living with HIV.
Collapse
|
5
|
Burnett T, Mozgunov P, Pallmann P, Villar SS, Wheeler GM, Jaki T. Adding flexibility to clinical trial designs: an example-based guide to the practical use of adaptive designs. BMC Med 2020; 18:352. [PMID: 33208155 PMCID: PMC7677786 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-020-01808-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 10/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Adaptive designs for clinical trials permit alterations to a study in response to accumulating data in order to make trials more flexible, ethical, and efficient. These benefits are achieved while preserving the integrity and validity of the trial, through the pre-specification and proper adjustment for the possible alterations during the course of the trial. Despite much research in the statistical literature highlighting the potential advantages of adaptive designs over traditional fixed designs, the uptake of such methods in clinical research has been slow. One major reason for this is that different adaptations to trial designs, as well as their advantages and limitations, remain unfamiliar to large parts of the clinical community. The aim of this paper is to clarify where adaptive designs can be used to address specific questions of scientific interest; we introduce the main features of adaptive designs and commonly used terminology, highlighting their utility and pitfalls, and illustrate their use through case studies of adaptive trials ranging from early-phase dose escalation to confirmatory phase III studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Burnett
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Fylde College, Lancaster, LA1 4YF UK
| | - Pavel Mozgunov
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Fylde College, Lancaster, LA1 4YF UK
| | - Philip Pallmann
- Centre for Trials Research, College of Biomedical & Life Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| | - Sofia S. Villar
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| | - Graham M. Wheeler
- Cancer Research UK & UCL Cancer Trials Centre, University College London, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 4TJ UK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Fylde College, Lancaster, LA1 4YF UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge, CB2 0SR UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Judge C, Murphy RP, Cormican S, Smyth A, O'Halloran M, O'Donnell M. Adaptive design methods in dialysis clinical trials: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e036755. [PMID: 32859663 PMCID: PMC7454175 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-036755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Revised: 04/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Adaptive design methods are a potential solution to improve efficiency of clinical trials but their uptake in dialysis is unknown. We aim to investigate the use of adaptive design methods in dialysis clinical trials and to cultivate further adoption of adaptive design methods by the nephrology community. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines and the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. We will perform a literature search through MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and CENTRAL, a detailed data extraction of trial characteristics and a narrative synthesis of the data. There will be no language restrictions. We will estimate the percentage of adaptive clinical trials per year in dialysis. Subgroup analysis will be performed by dialysis modality, funder and geographical location. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval will not be required for this study as data will be obtained from publicly available clinical trials. We will disseminate our results in a peer-reviewed publication. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor Judge
- HRB-Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland
- Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland
- Wellcome Trust - HRB, Irish Clinical Academic Training, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Deparrtment of Nephrology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Robert P Murphy
- HRB-Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland
| | - Sarah Cormican
- Wellcome Trust - HRB, Irish Clinical Academic Training, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Deparrtment of Nephrology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Andrew Smyth
- HRB-Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland
- Deparrtment of Nephrology, Galway University Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Martin O'Halloran
- Translational Medical Device Lab, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland
| | - Martin O'Donnell
- HRB-Clinical Research Facility, National University of Ireland, Galway, Co. Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, Todd S, Jaki T, Julious SA, Mander AP, Weir CJ, Koenig F, Walton MK, Nicholl JP, Coates E, Biggs K, Hamasaki T, Proschan MA, Scott JA, Ando Y, Hind D, Altman DG. The adaptive designs CONSORT extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. Trials 2020; 21:528. [PMID: 32546273 PMCID: PMC7298968 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04334-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Adaptive designs (ADs) allow pre-planned changes to an ongoing trial without compromising the validity of conclusions and it is essential to distinguish pre-planned from unplanned changes that may also occur. The reporting of ADs in randomised trials is inconsistent and needs improving. Incompletely reported AD randomised trials are difficult to reproduce and are hard to interpret and synthesise. This consequently hampers their ability to inform practice as well as future research and contributes to research waste. Better transparency and adequate reporting will enable the potential benefits of ADs to be realised.This extension to the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement was developed to enhance the reporting of randomised AD clinical trials. We developed an Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) guideline through a two-stage Delphi process with input from multidisciplinary key stakeholders in clinical trials research in the public and private sectors from 21 countries, followed by a consensus meeting. Members of the CONSORT Group were involved during the development process.The paper presents the ACE checklists for AD randomised trial reports and abstracts, as well as an explanation with examples to aid the application of the guideline. The ACE checklist comprises seven new items, nine modified items, six unchanged items for which additional explanatory text clarifies further considerations for ADs, and 20 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text. The ACE abstract checklist has one new item, one modified item, one unchanged item with additional explanatory text for ADs, and 15 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text.The intention is to enhance transparency and improve reporting of AD randomised trials to improve the interpretability of their results and reproducibility of their methods, results and inference. We also hope indirectly to facilitate the much-needed knowledge transfer of innovative trial designs to maximise their potential benefits. In order to encourage its wide dissemination this article is freely accessible on the BMJ and Trials journal websites."To maximise the benefit to society, you need to not just do research but do it well" Douglas G Altman.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munyaradzi Dimairo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
| | | | - James Wason
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, Reading, UK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| | - Steven A Julious
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Adrian P Mander
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher J Weir
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Franz Koenig
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Marc K Walton
- Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Titusville, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jon P Nicholl
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coates
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Katie Biggs
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - Michael A Proschan
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA
| | - John A Scott
- Division of Biostatistics in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, USA
| | - Yuki Ando
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - Douglas G Altman
- Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dimairo M, Pallmann P, Wason J, Todd S, Jaki T, Julious SA, Mander AP, Weir CJ, Koenig F, Walton MK, Nicholl JP, Coates E, Biggs K, Hamasaki T, Proschan MA, Scott JA, Ando Y, Hind D, Altman DG. The Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) statement: a checklist with explanation and elaboration guideline for reporting randomised trials that use an adaptive design. BMJ 2020; 369:m115. [PMID: 32554564 PMCID: PMC7298567 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Adaptive designs (ADs) allow pre-planned changes to an ongoing trial without compromising the validity of conclusions and it is essential to distinguish pre-planned from unplanned changes that may also occur. The reporting of ADs in randomised trials is inconsistent and needs improving. Incompletely reported AD randomised trials are difficult to reproduce and are hard to interpret and synthesise. This consequently hampers their ability to inform practice as well as future research and contributes to research waste. Better transparency and adequate reporting will enable the potential benefits of ADs to be realised.This extension to the Consolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement was developed to enhance the reporting of randomised AD clinical trials. We developed an Adaptive designs CONSORT Extension (ACE) guideline through a two-stage Delphi process with input from multidisciplinary key stakeholders in clinical trials research in the public and private sectors from 21 countries, followed by a consensus meeting. Members of the CONSORT Group were involved during the development process.The paper presents the ACE checklists for AD randomised trial reports and abstracts, as well as an explanation with examples to aid the application of the guideline. The ACE checklist comprises seven new items, nine modified items, six unchanged items for which additional explanatory text clarifies further considerations for ADs, and 20 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text. The ACE abstract checklist has one new item, one modified item, one unchanged item with additional explanatory text for ADs, and 15 unchanged items not requiring further explanatory text.The intention is to enhance transparency and improve reporting of AD randomised trials to improve the interpretability of their results and reproducibility of their methods, results and inference. We also hope indirectly to facilitate the much-needed knowledge transfer of innovative trial designs to maximise their potential benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Munyaradzi Dimairo
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - James Wason
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, UK
| | - Susan Todd
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Reading, UK
| | - Thomas Jaki
- Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Lancaster University, UK
| | - Steven A Julious
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Adrian P Mander
- Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, UK
- MRC Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher J Weir
- Edinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Franz Koenig
- Centre for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Jon P Nicholl
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Elizabeth Coates
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | - Katie Biggs
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | | | - Michael A Proschan
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, USA
| | - John A Scott
- Division of Biostatistics in the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, USA
| | - Yuki Ando
- Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, Japan
| | - Daniel Hind
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S1 4DA, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|