Association Between Infliximab Trough Levels and the Occurrence of Paradoxical Manifestations in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Case-Control Study

Identifying risk factors of anti-TNF induced skin lesions and other adverse events in paediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVES

While higher infliximab (IFX) trough concentrations (TCs) are associated with better outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), they could pose a risk for adverse events (AEs), including IFX-induced skin lesions. Therefore, we studied correlations between IFX TCs and occurrence of AEs in paediatric IBD patients.

METHODS

In this single-centre study, all children with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) receiving IFX maintenance therapy who underwent proactive drug monitoring between March 2015 and August 2022 were included. IFX doses/intervals/TCs and patient characteristics were systematically registered, as well as AEs and skin lesions appearance.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (72 CD and 37 UC) contributed 2913 IFX TCs. During a median follow-up of 3.0 [1.5-4.5] years, we observed 684 AEs in 101 patients and 49 skin lesions in 35 patients. There was no significant difference (p = .467) in median TCs between patients with and without skin lesions. However, higher median IFX doses were associated with an increased hazard rate of skin lesions [HR 1.084 (1.024-1.148), p = .005], in addition to female sex [2.210 (1.187-5.310), p = .016] and diagnosis of CD [1.695 (1.241-1.877), p = .011]. Considering IFX therapeutic TC cut-offs of 5.0 and 9.0 µg/mL, there was no significant difference in AE rate (p = .749 and p = .833, respectively). Also, no significant association between IFX doses and AE rate (p = .159).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing the IFX dose to achieve therapeutic TCs may not increase the overall risk of AEs in paediatric IBD patients. However, concerns arise regarding the risk of skin lesions, especially in female CD patients.

A Case of Paradoxical Arthralgia Following Anti-TNF Monoclonal Antibody Administration in a Patient With New-Onset Pediatric Crohn's Disease

Anti-TNF antibodies have become a first-line therapy in moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel diseases. However, there may be some rare paradoxical events and those affecting joints causing severe symptoms need a scrupulous differential diagnosis. When these events occur, it may be necessary to discontinue treatment and shift to another drug class. Herein, we report the case of a 15-year-old boy affected by Crohn's disease, who developed a paradoxical reaction after the second dose of infliximab. Clinical remission was achieved shifting to budesonide and azathioprine and continuing maintenance therapy with azathioprine alone. To date, no other paradoxical events have occurred.

Paradoxical reactions and biologic agents: a French cohort study of 9,303 patients

BACKGROUND

Paradoxical reactions (PRs) are defined as the occurrence during biologic therapy of a pathological condition that usually responds to these drugs.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of PRs and identify risk factors.

METHODS

Multicenter study of the database for the Greater Paris University Hospitals including biological-naïve patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor-α, anti-interleukin-12/23, anti-interleukin-17 or anti-α4ß7-integrin agents for psoriasis, inflammatory rheumatism or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We used natural language processing algorithms to extract data. A cohort and a case-control study nested in the cohort with controls selected by incidence density sampling was used to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Most of the 9,303 included patients (median age 43.0; 53.8% women) presented an IBD (3,773 [40.6%]) or a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease (3,708 [39.9%]), and 8,487 (91.2%) received anti-TNF-α agents. A total of 293 (3.1%) had a PR. The global incidence rate was 7.6 per 1,000 person-years (95%CI 6.7-8.4). Likelihood of PR was associated with IBD (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.9, 95%CI 1.1-3.2, p=0.021) and a combination of two inflammatory diseases (aOR 6.1, 95%CI 3.6-10.6, p<0.001) and was reduced with conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and corticosteroids (aOR 0.6, 95%CI 0.4-0.8, p=0.003; 0.4, 0.2-0.7, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Likelihood of PRs was associated with IBD or a combination of a least two inflammatory diseases. More studies are needed to assess the benefit of systematically adding csDMARDs for such high-risk patients.

Effect of antinuclear antibodies on pharmacokinetics of anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE

The detection of antinuclear antibodies (ANA) in serum of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has been associated with a worse response to anti-TNF therapy and the development of cutaneous or arthritic manifestations. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association of serum ANA with infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) trough levels (TLs) and anti-drug antibodies in IBD patients treated with IFX or ADA.

METHODS

Consecutive IBD patients under maintenance therapy with IFX or ADA in whom there was at least one available measurement of anti-TNF TLs, antibodies to IFX or ADA, and ANA in serum were included. The correlation of ANA positivity with demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment, TLs and anti-drug antibodies, of all patients was analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred two IBD patients under maintenance therapy with IFX or ADA were enrolled. Of these, 53 (52%) were ANA positive with 28 (27.5%) positive also to anti-ds-DNA in serum. In the univariate analysis ANA positivity was found to be correlated with age (P = 0.008), female gender (P = 0.03), duration of treatment (P = 0.06), arthralgias (P = 0.04) and TLs (P = 0.005). However, in multivariate logistic regression analysis only age and TLs remained significantly associated with the presence of ANA positivity (P = 0.04 and P =  = 0.006, respectively). No significant association of ANA positivity with the development of cutaneous or rheumatological manifestations was found.

CONCLUSIONS

In IBD patients under maintenance therapy with anti-TNF ANA positivity is associated with lower TLs. The clinical significance of this finding remains to be defined in future larger prospective studies.

Articular manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases treated with anti-TNF

Objective

To describe and identify factors associated with articular manifestations occurring in patients treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs).

Methods

Retrospective monocentric study, including all patients who received an anti-TNF for an IBD in our hospital. All incident articular manifestations occurring during treatment were analysed. Characteristics of patients with paradoxical articular manifestations were compared with that of patients without inflammatory articular manifestations.

Results

Between February 2013 and May 2017, we identified 442 patients (36.2±15 years, 50.5% men) who had ever received an anti-TNF for an IBD: Crohn’s disease (n=277), ulcerative colitis (n=154) and undetermined colitis (n=11). 115 (26%) patients developed new articular manifestations after a mean of 20 (±22) months of treatment. Among them, 59 (13.3%) had inflammatory manifestations: paradoxical in 39%, concomitant of an IBD flare in 27%, linked to an immunisation against anti-TNF in 27% and 7% to another diagnosis. Among paradoxical articular manifestations, 19 (83%) were new articular symptoms, including 8 (35%) de novo spondyloarthritis. There were no predictive factors of paradoxical articular manifestation. Paradoxical manifestations spontaneously resolved in 16 (70%) patients despite continuation of anti-TNF.

Conclusion

Inflammatory articular manifestations occurred in about 13% of patients treated with anti-TNF for IBD. More than a quarter were linked to an immunisation against anti-TNF, which has to be searched in this situation. About 40% were paradoxical. In most of cases, they were transitory and did not require anti-TNFs discontinuation.

Clinical Relevance of Anti-TNF Antibody Trough Levels and Anti-Drug Antibodies in Treating Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Background and Aims

The majority of patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy develop anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), which might result in loss of treatment efficacy. Strict guidelines on measuring trough levels (TLs) and ADA in clinical routine do not exist. To provide real-world data, we took advantage of our tertiary inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center patient cohort and determined indicators for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and actual consequences in patient care.

Methods

We retrospectively collected clinical data of 104 IBD patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab in our IBD clinic. Patients with TL and ADA measurements between June 2015 and February 2018 were included.

Results

The main reason for determining TL was increased clinical disease. Subtherapeutic TLs were found in 33 patients, therapeutic TLs in 33 patients, and supratherapeutic TLs in 38 patients. Adjustments in anti-TNF therapy occurred more frequently (p = 0.01) in patients with subtherapeutic TL (24 of 33 patients; 73%) as compared to patients with therapeutic and supratherapeutic TLs (26 of 71 patients; 37%). No correlation could be found between TL and disease activity (p = 0.16). Presence of ADA was found in 16 patients, correlated with the development of infusion reactions (OR: 10.6, RR: 5.4, CI: 2.9-38.6), and was associated with subtherapeutic TL in 15 patients (93.8%). Treatment adaptations were based on TL and/or ADA presence in 36 of 63 patients.

Conclusions

TDM showed significant treatment adaptations in patients with subtherapeutic TL. Conversely, in patients with therapeutic and supratherapeutic TLs, reasons for adaptations were based on considerations other than TL, such as clinical disease activity. Further studies should focus on decision-making in patients presenting with supratherapeutic TL in remission.

Is there a correlation between infliximab trough levels and the development of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The measurement of infliximab trough levels (IFX-TLs) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is performed to optimize treatment. However, the association between the development of adverse events (AEs) and IFX-TLs has not been sufficiently studied thus far. To investigate the possible association of IFX-TLs with AEs in Greek patients with IBD receiving maintenance treatment with IFX.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the registry data of the Gastroenterology Department of the University Hospital of Heraklion, from IBD patients with at least one available IFX-TL measurement during the years 2016 to 2017 was conducted. AEs reported 4 months before and 4 months after the measured IFX-TLs were recorded. The IFX-TLs of patients with or without AEs were compared.

RESULTS

Of a total of 83 IBD patients (61 Crohn's disease [73%]; 52 men [63%]; mean age ± standard deviation, 43.3 ± 16.0 years), 147 measurements of IFX-TLs were available (median 4.69 μg/ mL [1.32-9.16]), and 99 AEs (67.3%, 14 severe) were registered. The median IFX-TL of patients with AEs was 5.79 μg/mL (1.36- 10.25), higher than the median IFX-TL of patients without AEs (3.40 μg/mL [1.30-5.92]), but the difference was not significant (P= 0.97). The presence of infections or dermatologic reactions was not correlated with IFX-TLs. There was no difference in the prevalence of the total AEs (66.7% vs. 73.3%, P= 0.77) or in the analysis of AEs by group between patients with IFX-TLs ≥ 15 μg/ mL and patients with IFX-TLs < 15 μg/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

IFX-TLs are not significantly associated with the development of AEs in IBD patients receiving maintenance treatment with IFX.

Infliximab levels and antibodies in IBD-related peripheral arthralgia

BACKGROUND

Extra-intestinal manifestations (EIM) are common in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and may affect up to 40% of the patients during the course of the disease. Peripheral arthralgia (PA) is by far the most common EIM. To date, TNFα inhibitors are the most established treatment for EIMs in IBD. Infliximab (IFX) trough levels (TL) and anti-IFX antibodies (ATI) are correlated with multiple outcomes in IBD such as clinical response and remission, mucosal healing, fistular healing, and more. So far, a correlation between PA and IFX TL\ATI has not been evaluated.

METHODS

This retrospective study included IBD patients followed by the gastroenterology department of Sheba Medical Center. Patients with active PA at onset of IFX treatment were included. IFX TL and ATI were evaluated at week 6, 14, and 26 and correlated with PA persistence.

RESULTS

Forty patients (37 Crohn's and 3 ulcerative colitis) with IBD-related PA were included. The overall prevalence of PA was 55% (22/40), 42.5% (17/40), and 55% (22/40) after 6, 14, and 26 weeks, respectively. IFX trough drug levels were not associated with reported PA at week 6 [median, 11.8 μg/ml (IQR 6.6-15.5) vs 10.05 μg/ml (IQR 7.35-12.87), p = 0.56], week 14 [median, 4.7 μg/ml (IQR 2.3-7) vs 3.1 μg/ml (IQR 1.35-7.35), p = 0.55], and week 26 [median, 3 μg/ml (IQR 1.15-5.17) vs 3.4 μg/ml (IQR 0.13-6.75), p = 0.94]. Detectable ATI were significantly more prevalent in patients with PA than in patients without PA at week 26 [11/22 (50%) vs 3/18 (16.7%), p = 0.028].

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with IBD-related PA, ATI are associated with an increased risk of persistence of PA. No direct correlation was demonstrated between IFX TL and persistence of PA.

Intensified Infliximab Induction is Associated with Improved Response and Decreased Colectomy in Steroid-Refractory Paediatric Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Infliximab pharmacokinetics in steroid-refractory [SR] ulcerative colitis [UC] suggest a need for higher dosing, but data concerning efficacy of intensification in this setting are lacking in children and inconsistent overall.

METHODS

Paediatric patients [N = 125] treated with infliximab for SR or steroid-dependent UC were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes [clinical response and remission, colectomy, mucosal healing, safety] with standard vs intensified induction [mean induction dose ≥7 mg/kg or interval ≤5 weeks between doses 1 and 3] were compared.

RESULTS

Among 125 patients [median age 14 years, median UC duration 0.7 years, 74 SR], 73 [58%] received standard induction and 52 [42%] received intensified induction. Overall, 73 [58%] achieved remission (judged by physician global assessment [PGA] and paediatric UC activity index [PUCAI]≤10]. Among patients in remission, 7 [10%] experienced secondary loss of response by a median of 0.7 [IQR 0.4-1.0] years. Of the 74 SR patients, 17 [23%] underwent colectomy, and of the 51 steroid-dependent patients, 12 [24%] underwent colectomy. Intensified induction in SR patients was associated with a higher chance of remission (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2, p = 0.02) and a lower chance of colectomy [HR 0.4, p = 0.05], but did not improve outcomes in steroid-dependent patients. During follow-up, 46/73 [63%] patients in remission had regimen individualization, with similar rates of return to standard dosing after 1 year between those with initial intensified or standard induction. Follow-up endoscopy, performed in 35/73 patients in remission, demonstrated mucosal healing for 66%. Adverse events were rare, despite use of intensified regimens.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest a benefit from intensified infliximab induction specifically among children with steroid-refractory UC. Prospective studies comparing dosing regimens and incorporating therapeutic drug monitoring should be undertaken.

Higher adalimumab serum levels do not increase the risk of adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Background: The relationship between serum adalimumab concentrations and adverse events in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is unknown. We aimed to determine whether patients with IBD using adalimumab are at increased risk of adverse events if they have higher adalimumab serum levels compared to those with lower adalimumab levels. Methods: This was a retrospective study of 191 IBD patients with at least one serum adalimumab level measurement available. The cohort was divided using a cutoff level of 10 mcg/mL. The primary outcome was the rate of overall adverse events between the two groups. Secondary outcomes included rate of infections, dermatologic reactions, injection-site reactions and other adverse events in both groups. Rates of discontinuation of adalimumab due to adverse events were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between adalimumab levels and adverse events. Results: A total of 41 adverse events were reported in 191 patients in the overall cohort. Among 86 patients with higher adalimumab levels, 22 adverse events were reported, vs. 19 adverse events among 105 patients with lower adalimumab levels (25.6% vs. 18.1%, p = .21). Analysis according to adalimumab level tertiles also did not show significant differences in the rates of adverse events. A multivariate forward selection model also did not find higher odds of an adverse event in IBD patients with higher adalimumab levels compared to lower levels (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.77-3.08). Conclusions: There does not appear to be a relationship between adalimumab exposure and risk of adverse events in IBD patients.

Dose de-escalation to adalimumab 40 mg every three weeks in patients with inflammatory bowel disease-A multicenter, retrospective, observational study

BACKGROUND

Data about the outcomes after adalimumab dose de-escalation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are scarce.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the outcomes after adalimumab dose de-escalation, and to identify potential factors associated with failure.

METHODS

Retrospective, observational study including all IBD patients who had undergone adalimumab dose de-escalation to 40 mg every three weeks across seven GETAID centers, between June 2011 and September 2017. Failure of adalimumab dose de-escalation was defined as the need for treatment re-escalation, discontinuation of adalimumab, or clinical, biochemical and/or morphologic disease relapse.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients were identified (n = 46 Crohn's disease, n = 10 ulcerative colitis). Median (IQR) duration of follow-up after adalimumab dose de-escalation was 15.9 (7.9-30.6) months. Adalimumab dose de-escalation was a failure in 21/56 (37.5%) patients and successful in 35/56 (62.5%) patients. Median (IQR) time until failure was 8.9 (4.6-15.6) months. At multivariate analysis, inactive disease at magnetic resonance imaging and/or endoscopy in the year before adalimumab dose de-escalation decreased the risk of failure with a factor five (P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab dose de-escalation to 40 mg every three weeks is possible in almost two thirds of IBD patients. Objective morphologic signs of active disease should be ruled out before considering a de-escalation strategy with adalimumab.

Impact of vedolizumab therapy on extra-intestinal manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicentre cohort study nested in the OBSERV-IBD cohort

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of vedolizumab as a treatment for extraintestinal manifestations (EIM) is questionable due to its gut-specificity.

AIM

To assess effectiveness of vedolizumab for EIM in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a large real-life experience cohort.

METHODS

Between June and December 2014, 173 patients with Crohn's disease and 121 with ulcerative colitis were treated with vedolizumab. Patients were followed until week 54. EIM activity was assessed at weeks 0, 6, 14, 22, 30 and 54 by using a 3-step scale: complete remission, partial response and no response.

RESULTS

At baseline, 49 (16.7%) patients had EIMs of which 47 had inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis, four had cutaneous lesions and two had both rheumatologic and skin EIM. At week 54, 21 (44.7%) patients had complete remission for inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis and three (75%) for cutaneous EIM. In multivariate analysis, complete remission of inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis was associated with clinical remission of IBD (OR = 1.89, IC95% [1.05-3.41], P = .03) and recent onset of inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis (OR = 1.99, IC95% [1.12-3.52], P = .02). During the follow-up period, 34 (13.8%) patients without any EIM at baseline, developed incident cases of inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis consisting mostly of peripheral arthralgia without evidence of arthritis and 14 (4.8%) incident cases of paradoxical skin manifestation.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab therapy is commonly associated with improvement in EIM. This was associated with quiescent IBD and recent EIM. However, paradoxical skin manifestation and inflammatory arthralgia/arthritis may occur upon vedolizumab therapy.

The Evolving Evidence for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Monoclonal Antibodies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Biological medications are effective in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but adverse events, cost, and loss of response make their use challenging. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) allows clinicians to more safely, effectively, and efficiently use medications. The purpose of this article is to review and summarize the most recent literature pertaining to TDM in IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Measurement of biological drug trough levels predicts ongoing patient response and can be used to titrate the medication to be more effective and efficient. Antibodies against the medications predict loss of response and adverse events. Using both parameters can predict response to subsequent biologicals. Newer biologicals show similar characteristics to those more commonly used. Management protocols using drug and antibody levels optimize medication use and may be cost-effective. Recent evidence suggests benefit to TDM of biologicals in IBD.

Dose de-escalation to adalimumab 40 mg every 3 weeks in patients with Crohn's disease - a nested case-control study

BACKGROUND

Data on dose de-escalation in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) are limited.

AIM

To evaluate outcomes of dose de-escalation from adalimumab (ADM) every other week (EOW) to every three weeks (ETW).

METHODS

We selected patients with CD receiving maintenance therapy with ADM 40 mg ETW with serum levels (SL) available before and after dose de-escalation. Sex- and age-matched controls continuing ADM 40 mg EOW were identified. Patient reported outcome, C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin were collected.

RESULTS

Out of 898 patients, we identified 40 (11 male, median 37 years) who de-escalated to ADM 40 mg ETW for ADM-related adverse events (AE, n = 1), ADM SL >7 μg/mL (n = 8), or both (n = 31). Compared to controls, ADM SL dropped significantly within 4 months, without associated clinical or biochemical changes. In 53% of patients, dose de-escalation was associated with disappearance of AE (8/16 skin manifestation, 3/6 arthralgia, 5/7 frequent infectious episodes). During a median follow-up of 24 months, 65% of patients maintained clinical response, but 35% needed dose escalation back to ADM 40 mg EOW because of clinical relapse (n = 8), ADM SL <4 μg/mL (n = 2), or both (n = 4). CRP <3.5 mg/L at dose de-escalation was independently associated with dose escalation-free survival [odds ratio 6.28 (95% CI 1.83-21.59), P = 0.004]. We could not define a minimal ADM SL to consider or maintain dose de-escalation.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, 65% of patients who de-escalated to adalimumab 40 mg every 3 weeks remained in clinical remission for a median of 24 months. In 53% of patients, adalimumab-related adverse events disappeared after dose de-escalation. Regardless of adalimumab SL, disease remission should be assessed objectively prior to dose de-escalation.

Development of psoriasis in IBD patients under TNF-antagonist therapy is associated neither with anti-TNF-antagonist antibodies nor trough levels

BACKGROUND

The cause of anti-TNF-induced psoriasis is still unknown.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate if the appearance of psoriasis under anti-TNF therapy is associated with anti-TNF antibody levels and TNF-antagonist trough levels.

METHODS

In this case-control study we identified 23 patients (21 with Crohn's disease [CD], two with ulcerative colitis [UC]) who developed psoriasis under infliximab (IFX, n = 20), adalimumab (ADA, n = 2), and certolizumab pegol (CZP, n= 1) and compared them regarding the anti-TNF-antagonist antibody levels with 85 IBD patients (72 with CD, 13 with UC) on anti-TNF therapy without psoriasis.

RESULTS

Median disease duration was not different between the two groups (7 years in the group with psoriasis under TNF-antagonists vs. 10 years in the control group, p = 0.072). No patient from the psoriasis group had antibodies against TNF-antagonists compared to 10.6% in the control group (p = 0.103). No difference was found in IFX trough levels in the group of patients with psoriasis compared to the control group (2.6 μg/mL [IQR 0.9-5.5] vs. 3.4 μg/mL [IQR 1.4-8.1], p = 0.573). TNF-antagonist therapy could be continued in 91.3% of patients with TNF-antagonist related psoriasis and most patients responded to topical therapies.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF-induced psoriasis seems to be independent of anti-TNF antibodies and trough levels. Interruption of Anti-TNF therapy is rarely necessary.

Increased Cumulative Incidence of Dermatomyositis in Ulcerative Colitis: a Nationwide Cohort Study

On a molecular level, two autoimmune diseases: ulcerative colitis (UC) and dermatomyositis share common genetic determinants. On a clinical level, case reports evidenced the co-occurrence of these two diseases. We therefore hypothesize that UC is potentially associated with increased cumulative incidence of dermatomyositis. The goals of this retrospective cohort study were to evaluate whether UC is associated with increased cumulative incidence of dermatomyositis independent of sex and age. For comparison, we also assessed the cumulative incidence of polymyositis in UC and control subjects. The study enrolled 3,133 UC subjects and 14,726 control subjects. The cumulative incidence of dermatomyositis was significantly higher in UC than that of control subjects (p = 0.026), but the cumulative incidence of polymyositis was comparable between UC and control subjects (p = 0.596). UC was independently associated with the increased incident dermatomyositis (hazard ratio: 6.19, 95% confidence interval = 1.77-21.59, p = 0.004) after adjusting for sex, age, and concomitant rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and systemic sclerosis. Similar trends of increased dermatomyositis in UC were observed when patients were stratified based on sex and age. In conclusion, our findings suggest that UC is probably associated with increased cumulative incidence of dermatomyositis, independent of sex, age, and concomitant autoimmune diseases.

Advances in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologic Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: 2015 in Review

OPINION STATEMENT

Monoclonal antibody therapy directed against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (anti-TNFs) has revolutionized the care of patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. These large proteins are potentially immunogenic. Early clinical trials demonstrated an association with both serum concentrations of these agents as well as the presence of antidrug antibodies generated by the host with loss of response. More recent research has provided further evidence to confirm the impact of low drug trough concentrations and antidrug antibodies on subsequent clinical course in CD and UC. Given these clinical implications, treatment algorithms have been developed to aid clinicians in interpreting trough drug levels and antibody concentrations in those with confirmed active disease. Several studies have demonstrated the utility of these approaches. Furthermore, there are growing data supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in a prospective fashion in those patients who are clinically stable on anti-TNF therapies to ensure they are receiving appropriate dosing and have not yet developed antibodies. In addition, for those who have developed low-level antibodies, increasing the dose of an anti-TNF or adding an immunomodulator may help to overcome this immunologic response. Further research is required to assess these proposed strategies, as well as to determine the role of trough drug level assessment and antibody testing for new anti-TNFs and biologic medication with alternative mechanisms of action.

A safety assessment of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy for treatment of Crohn's disease

INTRODUCTION

Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) therapy has revolutionized the medical treatment of Crohn's disease (CD). Nevertheless, anti-TNF-α therapy has been associated with serious adverse events (SAE) raising safety concerns. This review focuses on the safety profile of anti-TNF-α agents in CD.

AREAS COVERED

We performed a literature search until August 2015 to collect safety data on infliximab, adalimumab and certolizumab pegol monotherapy or combined with immunomodulators (IMM). We have mainly focused on infections and malignancies. Safety in pregnancy, the elderly and children are also presented.

EXPERT OPINION

Available data in CD suggest that anti-TNF-α monotherapy or in combination with IMM is relatively safe, although it may be associated with an elevated risk of serious infections, skin cancer and lymphoma. However, as this data derive mainly from cohort studies, post-marketing registries, and meta-analyses of RCTs, often characterized by inherited methodological weaknesses that may hinder their validity, data from large, statistically powered, prospective studies of sufficient follow up are required to define the actual risk of SAE during anti-TNF-α therapy in IBD. The role of therapeutic drug monitoring in predicting and preventing SAE awaits confirmation.