Usefulness of HANBAH Score in Japanese Patients With Acute Heart Failure

The HANBAH score is a novel simple risk score consisting of hemoglobin level, age, sodium (N) level, blood urea nitrogen level, atrial fibrillation, and high-density lipoprotein. We aimed to validate this score in an external population. This retrospective study included 744 patients hospitalized for acute heart failure between 2015 and 2019. Each of the following criteria was scored as 1 point: hemoglobin level (<13.0 g/L for men and <12.0 g/L for women), atrial fibrillation, age (>70 years), serum blood urea nitrogen level (>26 mg/100 ml for men and >28 mg/100 ml for women), serum high-density lipoprotein level (<25 mg/100 ml), and serum sodium level (<135 mg/100 ml). HANBAH scores were available for 736 patients (age, 75 ± 13 years; 60% male; reduced [<40%] and preserved ejection fraction [≥50%]: 35% and 49%, respectively). All-cause death during follow-up, a composite of death and heart failure rehospitalization, and in-hospital death were observed in 173, 274, and 51 patients, respectively. The HANBAH score was significantly associated with these end points after adjustment for covariates (adjusted hazard ratio 1.38 [95% confidence interval 1.16 to 1.64], p <0.001; 1.27 [1.11 to 1.45], p <0.001; and 1.66 [1.18 to 2.33], p <0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic and net reclassification improvement analyses showed that the HANBAH score performed significantly better than AHEAD (atrial fibrillation, hemoglobin [anemia], elderly, abnormal renal parameters, diabetes mellitus) and AHEAD-U (AHEAD with uric acid) scores and similar to the multi-domain ACUTE HF score for all end points. In conclusion, the HANBAH score showed powerful risk stratification in this external Japanese cohort. Despite its simplicity, it performed better than other simple risk scores and similar to a multidomain risk score.

Short-term mechanical support with the Impella 5.x for mitral valve surgery in advanced heart failure-protected cardiac surgery

Introduction

Surgical treatment of patients with mitral valve regurgitation and advanced heart failure remains challenging. In order to avoid peri-operative low cardiac output, Impella 5.0 or 5.5 (5.x), implanted electively in a one-stage procedure, may serve as a peri-operative short-term mechanical circulatory support system (st-MCS) in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

Methods

Between July 2017 and April 2022, 11 consecutive patients underwent high-risk mitral valve surgery for mitral regurgitation supported with an Impella 5.x system (Abiomed, Inc. Danvers, MA). All patients were discussed in the heart team and were either not eligible for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) or surgery was considered favorable. In all cases, the indication for Impella 5.x implantation was made during the preoperative planning phase.

Results

The mean age at the time of surgery was 61.6 ± 7.7 years. All patients presented with mitral regurgitation due to either ischemic (n = 5) or dilatative (n = 6) cardiomyopathy with a mean ejection fraction of 21 ± 4% (EuroScore II 6.1 ± 2.5). Uneventful mitral valve repair (n = 8) or replacement (n = 3) was performed via median sternotomy (n = 8) or right lateral mini thoracotomy (n = 3). In six patients, concomitant procedures, either tricuspid valve repair, aortic valve replacement or CABG were necessary. The mean duration on Impella support was 8 ± 5 days. All, but one patient, were successfully weaned from st-MCS, with no Impella-related complications. 30-day survival was 90.9%.

Conclusion

Protected cardiac surgery with st-MCS using the Impella 5.x is safe and feasible when applied in high-risk mitral valve surgery without st-MCS-related complications, resulting in excellent outcomes. This strategy might offer an alternative and comprehensive approach for the treatment of patients with mitral regurgitation in advanced heart failure, deemed ineligible for TEER or with need of concomitant surgery.

Early predicting improvement of severe systolic heart failure by left atrial volume

Left atrium (LA) modulates left ventricle (LV) filling and cardiac performance. We aimed to assess the effect of heart failure (HF) therapy on LA and LV function, and the relationship between LA/LV improvement and clinical outcome in acute HF with reduced LV ejection fraction (LVEF). Totally, 224 hospitalized patients with acute HF and LVEF < 35% were enrolled and underwent echocardiography. They all received maximal tolerable doses of evidence-based medications. Patients received echocardiographic measurements at each visit including stroke volume, LVEF, LA minimal/maximal volume (LAV_min/LAV_max), LA expansion index, and tissue Doppler parameters. The threshold of LV functional improvement was LVEF > 45% ever occurred before study end. During the mean follow-up of 6.3 years, 62 cases improved well, mean LVEF 49 ± 5% at study end. The reduction of LV filling pressure occurring as early as 2 weeks later, LV systolic function improvement took longer (> 1 month). The reductions in LAV_min and LAV_max between initial stabilization and 2 weeks after HF treatment (Initial-2 W) and the increase of LA expansion index (Initial-2 W) were associated independently with LVEF improvement (p 0.002, 0.006, and 0.007, respectively). The best predictor of LVEF improvement was LAV_min reduction (Initial-2 W) > 5 ml with 77% sensitivity, 76% specificity. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses for cardiovascular events revealed LVEF improvement reduced 74% of events (hazard ratio 0.264, 95% CI 0.192-0.607, p < 0.0001); and LA expansion index (per 1% increase) reduced 14% of events (hazard ratio 0.862, 95% CI 0.771-0.959, p < 0.0001). The early reduction of LAV (Initial-2 W), especially LAV_min, is a powerful early predictor of LVEF improvement. Its occurrence reduces cardiovascular events significantly. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01307722.

Impact of mitral regurgitation in patients with acute heart failure: insights from the RELAX-AHF-2 trial

AIMS

The impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF) is not well established. We assessed the role of MR in patients enrolled in the Relaxin in Acute Heart Failure 2 (RELAX-AHF-2) trial.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients enrolled in RELAX-AHF-2 with available data regarding MR status were included in this analysis. Baseline characteristics, in-hospital data, and clinical outcomes through 180-day follow-up were evaluated. The impact of moderate/severe MR was assessed. Among 6420 AHF patients with known MR status, 1810 patients (28.2%) had moderate/severe MR. Compared to patients with no/mild MR, those with moderate/severe MR were more likely to have history of heart failure (HF), prior HF hospitalization, more comorbidities, symptoms/signs of HF, lower left ventricular ejection fraction and higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Moderate/severe MR was associated with longer length of hospital stay, higher rates of residual dyspnoea, increased jugular venous pressure through the index hospitalization and a higher unadjusted risk of the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or rehospitalization for HF/renal failure (RF) through 180 days (crude hazard ratio [HR] 1.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.27, p = 0.01). The association between moderate/severe MR and poorer outcomes was not maintained in a multivariable model including several covariates of interest (adjusted HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.17, p = 0.65). Similar findings were observed for HF/RF rehospitalization alone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with AHF, moderate/severe MR was associated with a worse clinical profile but did not have an independent prognostic impact on clinical outcomes.

External validation of the ACUTE HF score for risk stratification in acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

The ACUTE HF score is a simple risk score that predicts the prognosis of patients with acute heart failure (HF) using clinical and echocardiographic parameters. As this score was developed for a small European population, we aimed to validate this score in an external population.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective observational cohort analysis included patients hospitalized with acute HF during 2015-2019. Of 744 patients, 703 patients with available ACUTE HF scores were analyzed (75 ± 13 years; 61% male; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 49 ± 17%). Approximately one-third (34.4%) of the patients had reduced LVEF (<40%), and 51.4% exhibited preserved LVEF (≥50%). During a median follow-up of 452 days, primary and secondary outcomes were observed in 110 and 204 patients, respectively. The ACUTE HF score successfully stratified patients for primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary endpoints (a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure rehospitalization) in Kaplan-Meier analyses (log-rank test, P < 0.001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models showed that the score was significantly independently associated with both primary and secondary endpoints after adjusted by covariates (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

We validated the risk prediction ability of ACUTE HF score in an Asian population. This score may be applicable in clinical practice.

Mitral Regurgitation and Mortality Risk in Medicare Beneficiaries With Heart Failure and Preserved Ejection Fraction

The association of mitral regurgitation (MR) severity and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is uncertain. We sought to evaluate the relation between MR severity on transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and subsequent all-cause mortality in Medicare beneficiaries with HFpEF. We linked 57,608 patients referred for TTE at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center to Medicare inpatient claims from 2003 to 2017. In those with a history of HF and a physician-reported left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, we evaluated the relation of MR severity and time to the primary end point of all-cause mortality using Kaplan-Meier methods. A total of 7,778 individuals (14.5%) met inclusion criteria (mean age 75.5 years ± 11.9, 55.9% female). Over a median follow-up of 8.1 years, 2,016 (25.9%) died at a median (interquartile range) of 1.7 (0.3 to 4.1) years. At 1 year, 15.8% with 3 to 4+ MR had died versus 10.5% with 0 to 2+ MR (hazard ratio 1.54, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.95, p <0.001). After multivariable adjustment, 3 to 4+ MR continued to be associated with increased all-cause mortality (hazard ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.94, p = 0.004) except in the subset with atrial fibrillation (interaction p = 0.03) or recent (<3 months) HF hospitalization (p = 0.54). In conclusion, in this large, single-institution retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries with HFpEF who underwent TTE, moderate-to-severe and severe MR were significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after multivariable adjustment, except in those with atrial fibrillation or recent HF. Prospective studies are needed to assess the role of MR reduction in mitigating this risk.

The Prognostic Role of Mitral Valve Regurgitation Severity and Left Ventricle Function in Acute Heart Failure

Aims: Data about the prognostic interplay between mitral regurgitation MR and left ventricular (LV) function in the outcome of patients admitted with acute heart failure (AHF) are scarce. We evaluated the prognostic impact of MR severity and LV function on mortality and on recurrent heart failure hospitalization (re-HFH) in patients admitted with AHF. Methods and Results: In total, 6843 patients admitted with AHF were evaluated: 2521 patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 40% (reduced LVEF), 1238 of them (51%) having ≥moderate MR; and 4322 with LVEF > 40% (preserved LVEF), 1175 of them (27%) having ≥moderate MR. One-year mortality and re-HFH rates were higher in patients with ≥moderate MR unrelated to the baseline LV function (p = 0.028 and p < 0.001, respectively). After multivariable analysis, only reduced LVEF, and not the severity of MR, predicted mortality risk (HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 1.12−1.53] for patients with reduced LV function and ≤mild MR; HR: 1.44 [95% CI: 1.25−1.67] for patients with reduced LV function and ≥moderate MR); p < 0.001 for both. There was an increased risk for re-HFH in each group (HR: 1.35 [95% CI: 1.17−1.52] for patients with preserved LV function and ≥moderate MR; HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 1.15−1.51] for patients with reduced LV function and mild MR; and HR: 1.65 [95% CI: 1.45−1.88] for patients with reduced LV function and ≥moderate MR); p < 0.001 for all. Conclusions: In patients admitted with AHF, the LV function is the main prognostic determinant for mortality after 1 year. Significant (≥moderate) MR is associated with an increased risk of recurrent hospitalization.

Clinical impact of changes in mitral regurgitation severity after medical therapy optimization in heart failure

Background

Few data are available regarding changes in mitral regurgitation (MR) severity with guideline-recommended medical therapy (GRMT) in heart failure (HF). Our aim was to evaluate the evolution and impact of MR after GRMT in the Biology study to Tailored treatment in chronic heart failure (BIOSTAT-CHF).

Methods

A retrospective post-hoc analysis was performed on HF patients from BIOSTAT-CHF with available data on MR status at baseline and at 9-month follow-up after GRMT optimization. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization.

Results

Among 1022 patients with data at both time-points, 462 (45.2%) had moderate-severe MR at baseline and 360 (35.2%) had it at 9-month follow-up. Regression of moderate-severe MR from baseline to 9 months occurred in 192/462 patients (41.6%) and worsening from baseline to moderate-severe MR at 9 months occurred in 90/560 patients (16.1%). The presence of moderate-severe MR at 9 months, independent from baseline severity, was associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57–2.63; p < 0.001), also after adjusting for the BIOSTAT-CHF risk-prediction model (adjusted HR, 1.85; 95% CI 1.43–2.39; p < 0.001). Younger age, LVEF ≥ 50% and treatment with higher ACEi/ARB doses were associated with a lower likelihood of persistence of moderate-severe MR at 9 months, whereas older age was the only predictor of worsening MR.

Conclusions

Among patients with HF undergoing GRMT optimization, ACEi/ARB up-titration and HFpEF were associated with MR improvement, and the presence of moderate-severe MR after GRMT was associated with worse outcome.

Graphical abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00392-022-01991-7.

Prevalence and Mortality of Moderate or Severe Mitral Regurgitation Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With or Without Heart Failure: Results From CIN Study With 28,358 Patients

Aim

This study investigated the prevalence and mortality associated with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation (MR) among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), with or without heart failure (HF).

Methods

We analyzed patients undergoing PCI without mitral valve surgery from the Cardiorenal ImprovemeNt (CIN) study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04407936). Patients without echocardiography to determine MR occurrence or lacking follow-up death data were excluded. Primary endpoints were 1-year and long-term all-cause mortality, with a median follow-up time of 5 years (interquartile range: 3.1–7.6).

Results

Of 28,358 patients undergoing PCI treatment [mean age: 62.7 ± 10.7; women: 6,749 (25.6%)], 3,506 (12.4%) had moderate or severe MR, and there was a higher rate of moderate or severe MR in HF group than non-HF group (28.8 vs. 5.6%, respectively). Regardless of HF conditions, patients with moderate or severe MR were older and had worse cardio-renal function and significantly increased 1-year mortality [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 1.82, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.51–2.2], and long-term mortality [aHR: 1.43, 95% CI: 1.3–1.58]. There was no significant difference between patients with HF and those with non-HF (P for interaction > 0.05).

Conclusion

One-eighth of the patients undergoing PCI had moderate or severe MR. Furthermore, one-third and one-seventeenth experienced moderate or severe MR with worse cardiorenal function in the HF and non-HF groups, and increased consistent mortality risk. Further studies should explore the efficacy of mitral interventional procedures for moderate or severe MR after PCI treatment, regardless of HF.

Impact of mitral regurgitation in patients with worsening heart failure: insights from BIOSTAT-CHF

AIMS

Few data regarding the prevalence and prognostic impact of mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with worsening chronic or new-onset acute heart failure (HF) are available. We investigated the role of MR in the BIOlogy Study to TAilored Treatment in Chronic Heart Failure (BIOSTAT-CHF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective post-hoc analysis including patients from both the index and validation BIOSTAT-CHF cohorts with data regarding MR status. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization. Among 4023 patients included, 1653 patients (41.1%) had moderate-severe MR. Compared to others, patients with moderate-severe MR were more likely to have atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease and had larger left ventricular (LV) dimensions, lower LV ejection fraction (LVEF), worse quality of life, and higher plasma concentrations of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). A primary outcome event occurred in 697 patients with, compared to 836 patients without, moderate-severe MR [Kaplan-Meier 2-year estimate: 42.2% vs. 35.3%; hazard ratio (HR) 1.28; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.41; log-rank P < 0.0001]. The association between MR and the primary endpoint remained significant after adjusting for baseline variables and the previously validated BIOSTAT-CHF risk score (adjusted HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.00-1.23; P = 0.041). Subgroup analyses showed a numerically larger impact of MR on the primary endpoint in patients with lower LVEF, larger LV end-diastolic diameter, and higher plasma NT-proBNP.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-severe MR is common in patients with worsening chronic or new-onset acute HF and is strongly associated with outcome, independently of other features related to HF severity.

Chest pain and palpitations in postmenopausal women with mitral valve prolapse, is there a gastroesophageal origin?

INTRODUCTION

mitral valve prolapse(MVP) is a common disease in women, causing chest pain and palpitation, due to structural and functional valve abnormality, sometime associated with gastro-esophageal-reflux-disease(GERD).This is a challenging clinical problem in clinical practice,requires targeted diagnostic assessment,to identify the underlying causes of the symptoms because treatment needs to be tailored,according to the causes themselves, to resolve the symptoms. Our aim is to assess the prevalence of GERD in a population of postmenopausal women affected by MVP and if there is any correlation between the two conditions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MVP diagnosis was performed by echocardiograpic examination,according to ASE(American-Society-Echocardiography) criteria. 289 consecutive MVP women,symptomatic for chest pain and palpitation,were included,250 consecutive women without MVP, symptomatic for chest pain and palpitation were control group(CG).GERD diagnosis was performed according to 2013 ACG(American-College-Gastroenterology) criteria,women affected by thyroid disorders, all heart disease, including mitral disease with moderate or severe mitral regurgitation,gastrointestinal diseases assessed by gastroscopy were excluded.

RESULTS

31(11%) women were affected by GERD,among 289 with MVP, 11(4.4%) women were affected by GERD,among 250 on CG,Chi-squared 8.1,Odds ratio 2.7,c.i.95%,p<0.0044.26(9%) women,affected by GERD,with MVP,presented mild mitral regurgitation,7(2.8%) women of CG presented mild mitral regurgitation too,Chi-squared 8.95,Odds ratio 3.4,c.i.95%,p<0.0028.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

GERD is relatively common in women with MVP.Moreover,women with MVP have the chance of about three times more to be affected by GERD,the two conditions are correlated in a statistically-high- significant-way. GERD assessment needs to be included into routine follow-up strategies,in MVP women, to optimize medical therapy, improving symptoms relief, for a better quality of life. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Prevalence and Prognostic Significance of Mitral Regurgitation in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: The ARIC Study

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the prevalence and prognostic significance of mitral regurgitation (MR) in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) patients.

BACKGROUND

Few studies characterize the burden of MR in heart failure.

METHODS

The ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study surveilled ADHF hospitalizations for residents ≥55 years of age in 4 U.S. communities. ADHF cases were stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): <50% and ≥50%. Odds of moderate or severe MR in patients with varying sex and race, and odds of 1-year mortality in those with higher MR severity were estimated using multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

From 2005 to 2014, there were 17,931 weighted ADHF hospitalizations of which 49.2% had an LVEF <50% and 50.8% an LVEF ≥50%. Moderate or severe MR prevalence was 44.5% in those with an LVEF <50% and 27.5% in those with an LVEF ≥50%. Moderate or severe MR was more likely in females than males regardless of LVEF; LVEF <50% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.21 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11 to 1.33]), LVEF ≥50% (OR: 1.52 [95% CI: 1.36 to 1.69]). Among hospitalizations with an LVEF ≥50%, moderate or severe MR was less likely in blacks than whites (OR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.64 to 0.82]). Higher MR severity was independently associated with increased 1-year mortality in those with an LVEF <50% (OR: 1.30 [95% CI: 1.16 to 1.45]).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ADHF have a significant MR burden that varies with sex and race. In ADHF patients with an LVEF <50%, higher MR severity is associated with excess 1-year mortality.

The Prognostic Value of the Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Is Dependent upon the Severity of Mitral Regurgitation in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

The prognostic value of the left ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been questioned even though it is an accurate marker of left ventricle (LV) systolic dysfunction. This study aimed to examine the prognostic impact of LVEF in patients with AMI with or without high-grade mitral regurgitation (MR). A total of 15,097 patients with AMI who received echocardiography were registered in the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) between January 2005 and July 2011. Patients with low-grade MR (grades 0-2) and high-grade MR (grades 3-4) were divided into the following two sub-groups according to LVEF: LVEF ≤ 40% (n = 2,422 and 197, respectively) and LVEF > 40% (n = 12,252 and 226, respectively). The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiac events (MACE), cardiac death, and all-cause death during the first year after registration. Independent predictors of mortality in the multivariate analysis in AMI patients with low-grade MR were age ≥ 75 yr, Killip class ≥ III, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide > 4,000 pg/mL, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein ≥ 2.59 mg/L, LVEF ≤ 40%, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, PCI was an independent predictor in AMI patients with high-grade MR. No differences in primary endpoints between AMI patients with high-grade MR (grades 3-4) and EF ≤ 40% or EF > 40% were noted. MR is a predictor of a poor outcome regardless of ejection fraction. LVEF is an inadequate method to evaluate contractile function of the ischemic heart in the face of significant MR.

Cost-utility analysis of percutaneous mitral valve repair in inoperable patients with functional mitral regurgitation in German settings

BACKGROUND

To determine the cost-effectiveness of the percutaneous mitral valve repair (PMVR) using Carillon® Mitral Contour System® (Cardiac Dimensions Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA) in patients with congestive heart failure accompanied by moderate to severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) compared to the prolongation of optimal medical treatment (OMT).

METHODS

Cost-utility analysis using a combination of a decision tree and Markov process was performed. The clinical effectiveness was determined based on the results of the Transcatheter Implantation of Carillon Mitral Annuloplasty Device (TITAN) trial. The mean age of the target population was 62 years, 77% of the patients were males, 64% of the patients had severe FMR and all patients had New York Heart Association functional class III. The epidemiological, cost and utility data were derived from the literature. The analysis was performed from the German statutory health insurance perspective over 10-year time horizon.

RESULTS

Over 10 years, the total cost was €36,785 in the PMVR arm and €18,944 in the OMT arm. However, PMVR provided additional benefits to patients with an 1.15 incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and an 1.41 incremental life years. The percutaneous procedure was cost-effective in comparison to OMT with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €15,533/QALY. Results were robust in the deterministic sensitivity analysis. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis with a willingness-to-pay threshold of €35,000/QALY, PMVR had a 84 % probability of being cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous mitral valve repair may be cost-effective in inoperable patients with FMR due to heart failure.

Mitral regurgitation - Unmet need for improved management strategies

Background

The management of mitral regurgitation (MR) is challenging — patients may be asymptomatic, oligosymptomatic, older with comorbidities, or clinically symptomatic and not appropriate for surgery. The current review assesses morbidity, mortality, and risk factors associated with functional and organic MR, with a focus on severe MR.

Methods

A structured literature review was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and via hand-searching of conference proceedings. Prospective randomised controlled trials and observational studies including adult patients with MR reporting on treatment response rates, survival, time-to-treatment failure, quality of life, and adverse events were eligible for inclusion.

Results

In total, 32 publications met the inclusion criteria (9 in functional, 18 in organic, and 5 in functional/organic). Despite study heterogeneity, an increased risk of mortality and morbidity was observed which increased with MR severity. Risk factors associated with mortality and morbidity included advancing age, presence of atrial fibrillation, increasing effective regurgitant orifice, ejection fraction, left ventricle end systolic diameter, diabetes, and increasing New York Heart Association class.

Conclusions

The current review represents one of the most comprehensive conducted in the medical/conservative management of MR. An increased risk of mortality and morbidity, which appeared to rise with greater severity, was associated with MR (versus no MR). An unmet need exists in the management of patients with severe symptomatic MR and a high surgical risk as they have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Further research into alternative medical strategies and patient management is needed to improve prognoses and reduce mortality and morbidity.

Aetiology of mitral regurgitation differentially affects 2-year adverse outcomes after MitraClip therapy in high-risk patients

AIMS

To assess, and identify predictors of 2-year adverse outcomes of surgical high-risk patients after successful MitraClip therapy (MC), differentiated by the aetiology of mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survival free from death, heart failure rehospitalization, and reintervention up to 2 years in 202 successfully treated patients [74 ± 9 years, 132 men (65%); secondary MR aetiology in 140 patients, primary MR in 62]. Predictors for study endpoints were determined using Cox regression analyses. Mortality was 20% at 1 year and 33% at 2 years in both primary and secondary MR patients; independent predictors of death were reduced forward stroke volume, impaired LV function, and renal failure in primary MR, yet only an increased logistic EuroSCORE in functional MR patients. The rate of rehospitalizations was not different between the patient subgroups for 6 months, but then diverged significantly in favour of primary MR patients (estimated 2-year incidence, primary MR 40% vs. secondary MR 66%). No predictor was found for primary MR patients, but increased LV end-diastolic volume significantly increased the risk of rehospitalization in functional MR patients. Reinterventions were overall rare (7.4% at 1 year, 9.7% at 2 years); primary MR patients required all except one reintervention within 2 months of MC, with again no predictors found, whereas secondary MR patients (all except one with discharge MR of 2+) exhibited a steadily declining freedom from reintervention curve throughout follow-up.

CONCLUSION

MR aetiology affects rehospitalization and reintervention, but not mortality, differently after successful MC.

Mitral regurgitation in patients with heart failure. Interventional therapies

Mitral regurgitation (MR) is a common complication in heart failure patients, severely worsening their outcome. Because of the high perioperative risk, mitral valve surgery, which is the standard therapy for MR, is often not offered to these patients. Interventional therapies for mitral valve therapy might therefore constitute a novel therapeutic option particularly in this group. This article gives an overview of the available and evolving interventional strategies for mitral valve repair with a special emphasis on heart failure patients.