Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Competent blastocyst and receptivity endometrium improved clinical pregnancy in fresh embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Embryo quality is usually regarded as a key predictor of successful implantation and clinical pregnancy potential. The identification of embryos that have the capacity to implant and result in a healthy pregnancy is a crucial part of in vitro fertilization (IVF). Usually, morphologically high-quality embryos are chosen for embryo transfer in IVF treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the association between the available blastocyst formation rate and the clinical pregnancy outcome following the first fresh embryo transfer cycle and provide systematic individual treatment to adjust endometrial receptivity for the next transfer cycle.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-center study included 512 fresh embryo transfers conducted between 11/2019 and 08/2021, which consisted of 385 cleavage-stage (Day 3) and 127 blastocyst-stage (Day 5) embryo transfers. The two groups were divided into a clinical pregnancy group and a nonclinical pregnancy group for comparison. The association between the available blastocyst formation rate and the clinical pregnancy rate in the Day 3 and Day 5 transfer groups were considered.

RESULTS

In the Day 3 group, there were 275 clinical pregnancies, and the clinical pregnancy rate was 71.43%. Although the two pronuclei (2PN) oocyte rate and available embryo rate at Day 3 were significantly higher in the clinical pregnancy group than the nonclinical pregnancy group (P < 0.05), the blastocyst formation rate and the available blastocyst formation rate were not significantly different between the clinical pregnancy group and the nonclinical pregnancy group (P > 0.05). In the Day 5 group, there were 81 clinical pregnancies, and the clinical pregnancy rate was 63.78%. No baseline characteristics showed any obvious differences between the clinical pregnancy group and nonclinical pregnancy group (P > 0.05). The blastocyst formation rate in the nonclinical pregnancy group was higher than that in the clinical pregnancy group, but the difference was not statistically significant (81.06% vs. 77.03%, P = 0.083). Interestingly, the available blastocyst formation rate and the Day 5 available blastocyst formation rate were significantly higher in the nonclinical pregnancy group than the clinical pregnancy group (66.19% vs. 60.79%, P = 0.014; 54.58% vs. 46.98%, P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

In fresh cycles, the available blastocyst formation rate was not associated with the clinical pregnancy outcome for Day 3 embryo transfers, and the available blastocyst formation rate was not positively correlated with the clinical pregnancy outcome for Day 5 embryo transfers.

Extracellular vesicles secreted by human aneuploid embryos present a distinct transcriptomic profile and upregulate MUC1 transcription in decidualised endometrial stromal cells

STUDY QUESTION

Do extracellular vesicles (EVs) secreted by aneuploid human embryos possess a unique transcriptomic profile that elicits a relevant transcriptomic response in decidualized primary endometrial stromal cells (dESCs)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Aneuploid embryo-derived EVs contain transcripts of PPM1J, LINC00561, ANKRD34C, and TMED10 with differential abundance from euploid embryo-derived EVs and induce upregulation of MUC1 transcript in dESCs.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

We have previously reported that IVF embryos secrete EVs that can be internalized by ESCs, conceptualizing that successful implantation to the endometrium is facilitated by EVs. Whether these EVs may additionally serve as biomarkers of ploidy status is unknown.

STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION

Embryos destined for biopsy for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) were grown under standard conditions. Spent media (30 μl) were collected from euploid (n = 175) and aneuploid (n = 140) embryos at cleavage (Days 1-3) stage and from euploid (n = 187) and aneuploid (n = 142) embryos at blastocyst (Days 3-5) stage. Media samples from n = 35 cleavage-stage embryos were pooled in order to obtain five euploid and four aneuploid pools. Similarly, media samples from blastocysts were pooled to create one euploid and one aneuploid pool. ESCs were obtained from five women undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS

EVs were isolated from pools of media by differential centrifugation and EV-RNA sequencing was performed following a single-cell approach that circumvents RNA extraction. ESCs were decidualized (estradiol: 10 nM, progesterone: 1 µM, cAMP: 0.5 mM twice every 48 h) and incubated for 24 h with EVs (50 ng/ml). RNA sequencing was performed on ESCs.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Aneuploid cleavage stage embryos secreted EVs that were less abundant in RNA fragments originating from the genes PPM1J (log2fc = -5.13, P = 0.011), LINC00561 (log2fc = -7.87, P = 0.010), and ANKRD34C (log2fc = -7.30, P = 0.017) and more abundant in TMED10 (log2fc = 1.63, P = 0.025) compared to EVs of euploid embryos. Decidualization per se induced downregulation of MUC1 (log2fc = -0.54, P = 0.0028) in ESCs as a prerequisite for the establishment of receptive endometrium. The expression of MUC1 transcript in decidualized ESCs was significantly increased following treatment with aneuploid compared to euploid embryo-secreted EVs (log2fc = 0.85, P = 0.0201).

LARGE SCALE DATA

Raw data have been uploaded to GEO (accession number GSE234338).

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

The findings of the study will require validation utilizing a second cohort of EV samples.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The discovery that the transcriptomic profile of EVs secreted from aneuploid cleavage stage embryos differs from that of euploid embryos supports the possibility to develop a non-invasive methodology for PGT-A. The upregulation of MUC1 in dESCs following aneuploid embryo EV treatment proposes a new mechanism underlying implantation failure.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The study was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions fellowship awarded to SM by the European Commission (CERVINO grant agreement ID: 79620) and by a BIRTH research grant from Theramex HQ UK Ltd. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients

STUDY QUESTION

What are the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in women who underwent up to two more euploid blastocyst transfers after three failures in the absence of another known factor that affects implantation?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The fourth and fifth euploid blastocyst transfers resulted in similar live birth rates of 40% and 53.3%, respectively, culminating in a cumulative live birth rate of 98.1% (95% CI = 96.5-99.6%) after five euploid blastocyst transfers.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The first three euploid blastocysts have similar implantation and live birth rates and provide a cumulative live birth rate of 92.6%.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

An international multi-center retrospective study was conducted at 25 individual clinics. The study period spanned between January 2012 and December 2022. A total of 123 987 patients with a total of 64 572 euploid blastocyst transfers were screened for inclusion.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients with a history of any embryo transfer at another clinic, history of any unscreened embryo transfer at participating clinics, parental karyotype abnormalities, the use of donor oocytes or a gestational carrier, untreated intracavitary uterine pathology (e.g. polyp, leiomyoma), congenital uterine anomalies, adenomyosis, communicating hydrosalpinx, endometrial thickness <6 mm prior to initiating of progesterone, use of testicular sperm due to non-obstructive azoospermia in the male partner, transfer of an embryo with a reported intermediate chromosome copy number (i.e. mosaic), preimplantation genetic testing cycles for monogenic disorders, or structural chromosome rearrangements were excluded. Ovarian stimulation protocols and embryology laboratory procedures including trophectoderm biopsy followed the usual practice of each center. The ploidy status of blastocysts was determined with comprehensive chromosome screening. Endometrial preparation protocols followed the usual practice of participating centers and included programmed cycles, natural or modified natural cycles.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 105 (0.085% of the total population) patients met the criteria and underwent at least one additional euploid blastocyst transfer after failing to achieve a positive pregnancy test with three consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers. Outcomes of the fourth and fifth euploid blastocyst transfers were similar across participating centers. Overall, the live birth rate was similar with the fourth and fifth euploid blastocysts (40% vs 53.3%, relative risk = 1.33, 95% CI = 0.93-1.9, P value = 0.14). Sensitivity analyses excluding blastocysts biopsied on Day 7 postfertilization, women with a BMI >30 kg/m2, cycles using non-ejaculate or donor sperm, double-embryo transfer cycles, and cycles in which the day of embryo transfer was modified due to endometrial receptivity assay test result yielded similar results. Where data were available, the fourth euploid blastocyst had similar live birth rate with the first one (relative risk = 0.84, 95% CI = 0.58-1.21, P = 0.29). The cumulative live birth rate after five euploid blastocyst transfers was 98.1% (95% CI = 96.5-99.6%).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Retrospective design has its own inherent limitations. Patients continuing with a further euploid embryo transfer and patients dropping out from treatment after three failed euploid transfers can be systematically different, perhaps with regard to ovarian reserve or economic status.

WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS

Implantation failure seems to be mainly due to embryonic factors. Given the stable and high live birth rates up to five euploid blastocysts, unexplained recurrent implantation failure should have a prevalence of <2%. Proceeding with another embryo transfer can be the best next step once a known etiology for implantation failure is ruled out.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

When the Embryo Meets the Endometrium: Identifying the Features Required for Successful Embryo Implantation

Evaluation of the optimal number of embryos, their quality, and the precise timing for transfer are critical determinants in reproductive success, although still remaining one of the main challenges in assisted reproduction technologies (ART). Indeed, the success of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments relies on a multitude of events and factors involving both the endometrium and the embryo. Despite concerted efforts on both fronts, the overall success rates of IVF techniques continue to range between 25% and 30%. The role of the endometrium in implantation has been recently recognized, leading to the hypothesis that both the "soil" and the "seed" play a central role in a successful pregnancy. In this respect, identification of the molecular signature of endometrial receptivity together with the selection of the best embryo for transfer become crucial in ART. Currently, efforts have been made to develop accurate, predictive, and personalized tests to identify the window of implantation and the best quality embryo. However, the value of these tests is still debated, as conflicting results are reported in the literature. The purpose of this review is to summarize and critically report the available criteria to optimize the success of embryo transfer and to better understand current limitations and potential areas for improvement.

Moonshots and last miles: what it may take to treat infertility for all

Innovation in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) is at an all-time high, with new technologies being developed for the laboratory and around the patient experience, and deployed quickly and effectively. Nevertheless, substantial improvements in the success of infertility care seem to elude the field. This article presents the view that MAR is missing the key innovation motor of mechanistic knowledge, which historically relates to a lack of public resources of the kind afforded to other diseases. It is posited that unless and until we raise infertility at the level of an urgent unmet medical need in the eyes of government and national funding body, innovation will be limited in scope and impact, and be incremental in nature.

Diagnostic or prognostic? Decoding the role of embryo selection on in vitro fertilization treatment outcomes

In this review, we take a fresh look at embryo assessment and selection methods from the perspective of diagnosis and prognosis. On the basis of a systematic search in the literature, we examined the evidence on the prognostic value of different embryo assessment methods, including morphological assessment, blastocyst culture, time-lapse imaging, artificial intelligence, and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

Management strategies following implantation failure of euploid embryos

Background

Euploid blastocyst implantation failure may result from embryonic factors undetectable by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A); however, various nonembryonic factors can also intricately interfere with implantation. This review seeks to clarify evidence-based testing and treatments for implantation failure after euploid embryo transfer.

Methods

We conducted a review of the literature on implantation failure after euploid embryo transfer or multiple embryo transfer cycles, which mainly included systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Results

The recommended tests for implantation failure include (1) hysteroscopy, (2) endometrial CD138 immunohistochemistry and bacterial culture, (3) serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D3, and (4) thrombophilia screening. Based on diagnostic findings, the following treatments have been recommended: (1) antibiotics for chronic endometritis, (2) vitamin D replacement, (3) lifestyle modification, and (4) low-dose aspirin starting from the postimplantation period for thrombophilia. Moreover, frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer using assisted hatching and hyaluronan-enriched transfer medium may support embryo implantation.

Conclusion

To ensure a successful pregnancy in subsequent embryo transfers, simple, inexpensive, and evidence-based tests and treatments should be selected.

PGT-A: Houston, we have a problem

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a common add-on to IVF cycles. As it is presently performed, PGT-A relies on whole genome amplification of small amounts of DNA from cells removed from the trophectoderm (TE) of a blastocyst for determination of gain or loss of chromosomal material by next-generation sequencing. Whole genome amplification may introduce artifacts such as allele dropout and loss of heterozygosity in up to 25% of cases. In addition, the high prevalence of mosaicism in human embryos is a complicating factor in interpreting the results of PGT-A screening. In the presence of mosaicism, biopsy of TE cells cannot provide accurate results regarding the chromosomal make-up of the inner cell mass. The available clinical data suggest that PGT-A is probably harmful when IVF outcomes are analyzed by intention to treat or by live birth rate per cycle started rather than per embryo transfer, especially in women with three or fewer blastocysts. In addition, hypothesized advantages of reduced spontaneous abortion rate and reduced time to conception may be modest at best.