A retrospective 'real-world' cohort study of azole therapeutic drug monitoring and evolution of antifungal resistance in cystic fibrosis

Evaluation of the drug-drug interaction between triazole antifungals and cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator modulators in a real-life cohort

Limited data on the clinical management of drug-drug interactions between triazoles and Cystic Fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulators are available. We retrospectively evaluated azole target attainment and dose adaptations in patients from two Dutch CF centres concomitantly receiving triazoles and CFTR modulators. In total, 21 patients with 59 triazole trough concentrations were evaluated. Subtherapeutic concentrations were frequently observed, especially for itraconazole and voriconazole. Of the investigated antifungal agents, posaconazole appears the most preferable option. Our results emphasize the importance of adequate management of this interaction and underpin the added value of therapeutic drug monitoring of triazoles in this population.

Utility of triazole antifungal therapeutic drug monitoring: Insights from the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists: Endorsed by the Mycoses Study Group Education and Research Consortium

Triazole antifungals (i.e., fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole) are commonly used in clinical practice to prevent or treat invasive fungal infections. Most triazole antifungals require therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) due to highly variable pharmacokinetics, known drug interactions, and established relationships between exposure and response. On behalf of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP), this insight describes the pharmacokinetic principles and pharmacodynamic targets of commonly used triazole antifungals and provides the rationale for utility of TDM within each agent.

Novel Applications of Biomarkers and Personalized Medicine in Cystic Fibrosis

As routine care in cystic fibrosis (CF) becomes increasingly personalized, new opportunities to further focus care on the individual have emerged. These opportunities are increasingly filled through research in tools aiding drug selection, drug monitoring and titration, disease-relevant biomarkers, and evaluation of therapeutic benefits. Herein, we will discuss such research tools presently being translated into the clinic to improve the personalization of care in CF.

Tackling the emerging threat of antifungal resistance to human health

Invasive fungal infections pose an important threat to public health and are an under-recognized component of antimicrobial resistance, an emerging crisis worldwide. Across a period of profound global environmental change and expanding at-risk populations, human-infecting pathogenic fungi are evolving resistance to all licensed systemic antifungal drugs. In this Review, we highlight the main mechanisms of antifungal resistance and explore the similarities and differences between bacterial and fungal resistance to antimicrobial control. We discuss the research and innovation topics that are needed for risk reduction strategies aimed at minimizing the emergence of resistance in pathogenic fungi. These topics include links between the environment and One Health, surveillance, diagnostics, routes of transmission, novel therapeutics and methods to mitigate hotspots for fungal adaptation. We emphasize the global efforts required to steward our existing antifungal armamentarium, and to direct the research and development of future therapies and interventions.

Successful Management of Mixed Mycosis in HIV-Negative Patients With Different Immune Status: A Case Series Report

Objective

The limited information available on mixed mycosis involving the lungs makes the understanding of mixed fungal diseases insufficient and affects prognosis. Our study aims to improve understanding by exploring experience in the successful management of mixed fungal infections.

Methods

Patients who had two types of mycosis involving the lung at the same disease course were retrospectively enrolled.

Results

Between September 2011 and December 2019, 17 patients with proven mixed mycosis were enrolled. Four patients were immunocompromised, with one case each of lung transplantation, corticosteroid treatment, STAT3 hyper-IgE syndrome, and anti-IFN-γ autoantibody-associated immunodeficiency syndrome. Among 13 patients who were not immunocompromised, 9 had type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eight cases were coinfection with Mucor and Aspergillus, 4 cases were Cryptococcus and Aspergillus, 2 cases were Talaromyces marneffei and Cryptococcus, 2 cases were Talaromyces marneffei and Aspergillus, and 1 case was Candida and Aspergillus. Seven patients were diagnosed with mixed pulmonary mycosis at almost the same time. Among the remaining 10 patients, the initial treatment was ineffective in four cases, and six patients showed a partial response to the initial antifungal treatment, but the original fungal lesions became re-enlarged. Three patients were admitted to the intensive care unit during hospitalization, and one patient died. Another Mucor coinfection patient died due to treatment refusal.

Conclusion

Mixed mycosis involving the lungs is not uncommon in patients without apparent immune deficiency diseases. During the management of mycosis, we recommend keeping mixed mycosis in mind for patients with a poor response to initial antifungal treatment, even in immunocompetent populations, and identifying the cause of illness through a rigorous procedure.

Collateral consequences of agricultural fungicides on pathogenic yeasts: A One Health perspective to tackle azole resistance

Candida and Cryptococcus affect millions of people yearly, being responsible for a wide array of clinical presentations, including life-threatening diseases. Interestingly, most human pathogenic yeasts are not restricted to the clinical setting, as they are also ubiquitous in the environment. Recent studies raise concern regarding the potential impact of agricultural use of azoles on resistance to medical antifungals in yeasts, as previously outlined with Aspergillus fumigatus. Thus, we undertook a narrative review of the literature and provide lines of evidence suggesting that an alternative, environmental route of azole resistance, may develop in pathogenic yeasts, in addition to patient route. However, it warrants sound evidence to support that pathogenic yeasts cross border between plants, animals and humans and that environmental reservoirs may contribute to azole resistance in Candida or other yeasts for humans. As these possibilities could concern public health, we propose a road map for future studies under the One Health perspective.