Expression of the chemokine receptor CCR1 in human renal allografts

B cells in the formation of tertiary lymphoid organs in autoimmunity, transplantation and tumorigenesis

Tertiary lymphoid organs named also tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) often occur at sites of autoimmune inflammation, organ transplantation and cancer. Although the mechanisms for their formation/function are not entirely understood, it is known that TLS can display features of active germinal centres supporting the proliferation and differentiation of (auto)-reactive B cells. In this Review, we discuss current knowledge on TLS-associated B cells with particular reference on how within diseased tissues these structures are linked to either deleterious or protective outcomes in patients and the potential for therapeutic targeting of TLS through novel drugs.

Spoiling for a Fight: B Lymphocytes As Initiator and Effector Populations within Tertiary Lymphoid Organs in Autoimmunity and Transplantation

Tertiary lymphoid organs (TLOs) develop at ectopic sites within chronically inflamed tissues, such as in autoimmunity and rejecting organ allografts. TLOs differ structurally from canonical secondary lymphoid organs (SLOs), in that they lack a mantle zone and are not encapsulated, suggesting that they may provide unique immune function. A notable feature of TLOs is the frequent presence of structures typical of germinal centers (GCs). However, little is known about the role of such GCs, and in particular, it is not clear if the B cell response within is autonomous, or whether it synergizes with concurrent responses in SLOs. This review will discuss ectopic lymphoneogenesis and the role of the B cell in TLO formation and subsequent effector output in the context of autoimmunity and transplantation, with particular focus on the contribution of ectopic GCs to affinity maturation in humoral immune responses and to the potential breakdown of self-tolerance and development of humoral autoimmunity.

Allo-specific immune response profiles indicative of acute rejection in kidney allografts using an in vitro lymphocyte culture-based model

BACKGROUND

Ability to predict the manner in which a recipient's immune system would respond to a transplanted graft by analyzing cytokine profiles of the "allograft antigen sensitized" recipient lymphocytes in vitro might provide a means to identify patients at risk to adverse clinical endpoints.

METHODS

Cytokine/chemokine gene expression profiles of peripheral blood mononuclear cells co-cultured with allograft antigen-pulsed macrophages were studied in 49 renal transplant recipients-12 with acute cellular rejection (ACR) with or without antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), 7 with AMR (without ACR), and 30 with stable allografts (SA). An 86-gene inflammatory cytokines and receptors PCR array was used to measure fold changes in gene expression between pulsed and un-pulsed cultures.

RESULTS

On linear discriminant analysis and multivariate analysis of variance, a gene set comprising C3, CCL3, IL1B, TOLLIP, IL10, CXCL5, ABCF1, CCR3, IL10RB, CXCL1, and IL1R1 differentiated the ACR-AMR from the SA group. Similarly, a gene set comprising IL10, C3, IL37, IL1B, CCL3, CARD18, and TOLLIP differentiated the AMR from the SA group. No significant difference was found between the ACR-AMR vs AMR groups.

CONCLUSION

Distinct post in vitro stimulation cytokine profiles at the time of transplantation thus correlated with the occurrence of post-transplantation rejection episodes which indicated feasibility of this in vitro model to assess the recipient's anti-graft response at an early stage.

Immunological characteristics of renal transplant tolerance in humans

Establishing allograft tolerance is a highly desirable therapeutic goal in kidney transplantation, from which recipients would greatly benefit by withdrawing or minimizing immunosuppression. Identifying biomarkers in predicting tolerance or early diagnosing rejection is essential to direct personalized management. Recent findings have revealed that multiple populations of immune cells have involved in promoting long-term graft function or inducing rejection in renal transplant recipients. Thus, roles of immune cells add another level to predict the renal tolerant state; tailoring their functional and/or phenotypic characteristics would provide insights into mechanism involved in transplant tolerance that may aid in designing new therapies. Here, we review these findings and discuss the current understanding immunological characteristics of renal transplant tolerance in humans, and their potential clinical translation to immune tolerance biomarkers.

The lymphotoxin β receptor is a potential therapeutic target in renal inflammation

Accumulation of inflammatory cells in different renal compartments is a hallmark of progressive kidney diseases including glomerulonephritis (GN). Lymphotoxin β receptor (LTβR) signaling is crucial for the formation of lymphoid tissue, and inhibition of LTβR signaling has ameliorated several non-renal inflammatory models. Therefore, we tested whether LTβR signaling could also have a role in renal injury. Renal biopsies from patients with GN were found to express both LTα and LTβ ligands, as well as LTβR. The LTβR protein and mRNA were localized to tubular epithelial cells, parietal epithelial cells, crescents, and cells of the glomerular tuft, whereas LTβ was found on lymphocytes and tubular epithelial cells. Human tubular epithelial cells, mesangial cells, and mouse parietal epithelial cells expressed both LTα and LTβ mRNA upon stimulation with TNF in vitro. Several chemokine mRNAs and proteins were expressed in response to LTβR signaling. Importantly, in a murine lupus model, LTβR blockade improved renal function without the reduction of serum autoantibody titers or glomerular immune complex deposition. Thus, a preclinical mouse model and human studies strongly suggest that LTβR signaling is involved in renal injury and may be a suitable therapeutic target in renal diseases.

Dendritic cells and macrophages in the kidney: a spectrum of good and evil

Renal dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages represent a constitutive, extensive and contiguous network of innate immune cells that provide sentinel and immune-intelligence activity; they induce and regulate inflammatory responses to freely filtered antigenic material and protect the kidney from infection. Tissue-resident or infiltrating DCs and macrophages are key factors in the initiation and propagation of renal disease, as well as essential contributors to subsequent tissue regeneration, regardless of the aetiological and pathogenetic mechanisms. The identification, and functional and phenotypic distinction of these cell types is complex and incompletely understood, and the same is true of their interplay and relationships with effector and regulatory cells of the adaptive immune system. In this Review, we discuss the common and distinct characteristics of DCs and macrophages, as well as key advances that have identified the renal-specific functions of these important phagocytic, antigen-presenting cells, and their roles in potentiating or mitigating intrinsic kidney disease. We also identify remaining issues that are of priority for further investigation, and highlight the prospects for translational and therapeutic application of the knowledge acquired.

Evidence of enhanced systemic inflammation in stable kidney transplant recipients with low Framingham risk scores

BACKGROUND

While the Framingham risk score (FRS) predicts cardiovascular risk in the general population, it underestimates cardiovascular events in renal transplant recipients (RTR). Inflammation is common in RTR, and it is also a hallmark of vascular injury contributing to cardiovascular events.

OBJECTIVE

To explore the relationship between inflammatory chemokines (CCL family) and FRS in a stable RTR.

METHODS

The modified FRS (2009) was used to calculate the 10-yr probability of CVE in 150 RTR. A cross-sectional study measured plasma levels of 14 CCLs by Luminex technique in 53% (79/150) of the cohort and 28 controls.

RESULTS

43.3% of RTR was classified as low, 16% moderate, and 40.7% high FRS. FRS correlated with eGFR and all CCLs with R of <0.2(p = n.s). Compared with controls, CCL 1,4,8,15, and 27 were equally increased in both the high and low FRS groups (p < 0.04 and 0.03, respectively). The percentage of patients with low FRS and CCL 8,15, and 27 values above the 95% cutoff control levels was 46.1%, 76.9%, and 53.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Over one half of stable RTR, including those with low FRS, have increased inflammatory chemokine levels. Inflammation is not accounted for in the FRS, and this may explain the poor performance of FRS in transplant patients.

Danger control programs cause tissue injury and remodeling

Are there common pathways underlying the broad spectrum of tissue pathologies that develop upon injuries and from subsequent tissue remodeling? Here, we explain the pathophysiological impact of a set of evolutionary conserved danger control programs for tissue pathology. These programs date back to the survival benefits of the first multicellular organisms upon traumatic injuries by launching a series of danger control responses, i.e., 1. Haemostasis, or clotting to control bleeding; 2. Host defense, to control pathogen entry and spreading; 3. Re-epithelialisation, to recover barrier functions; and 4. Mesenchymal, to repair to regain tissue stability. Taking kidney pathology as an example, we discuss how clotting, inflammation, epithelial healing, and fibrosis/sclerosis determine the spectrum of kidney pathology, especially when they are insufficiently activated or present in an overshooting and deregulated manner. Understanding the evolutionary benefits of these response programs may refine the search for novel therapeutic targets to limit organ dysfunction in acute injuries and in progressive chronic tissue remodeling.

The role of macrophage lineage cells in kidney graft rejection and survival

Large numbers of macrophage lineage cells are present in transplants undergoing ischemia-reperfusion injury and rejection, and their presence correlates with a high probability of rejection. However, the extent to which monocytes and macrophages contribute to kidney graft rejection is poorly understood. The heterogeneity of the monocyte/macrophage lineage cells could be one of the reasons why these cells have been neglected up to now. Circulating monocytes can be divided into various subsets, which are able to give rise to tissue macrophages and dendritic cells. Macrophages are believed to be highly plastic cells that can respond to environmental signals by changing their phenotype and function. Macrophages have established roles in early and late kidney graft inflammation, tissue homeostasis, remodeling, and repair. In kidney transplantation, macrophages are believed to play a role in both damage and repair of the graft, depending on the type of macrophages involved, the environmental drive, and the time after transplantation. The heterogeneity and plasticity of monocytes and macrophages are obstacles to translating the functional relevance of this cell lineage to diagnostic and prognostic clinical parameters and to defining specific, macrophage-related, therapeutic targets. Recent evidence has indicated an immunomodulatory role for the so-called regulatory macrophages in induction of tolerance in kidney transplant recipients. In this article, we summarize current views on monocyte/macrophage immunobiology in kidney transplantation. Key issues for ongoing research are discussed.

Four danger response programs determine glomerular and tubulointerstitial kidney pathology: clotting, inflammation, epithelial and mesenchymal healing

Renal biopsies commonly display tissue remodeling with a combination of many different findings. In contrast to trauma, kidney remodeling largely results from intrinsic responses, but why? Distinct danger response programs were positively selected throughout evolution to survive traumatic injuries and to regenerate tissue defects. These are: (1) clotting to avoid major bleeding, (2) immunity to control infection, (3) epithelial repair and (4) mesenchymal repair. Collateral damages are acceptable for the sake of host survival but causes for kidney injury commonly affect the kidneys in a diffuse manner. This way, coagulation, inflammation, deregulated epithelial healing or fibrosis contribute to kidney remodeling. Here, I focus on how these ancient danger response programs determine renal pathology mainly because they develop in a deregulated manner, either as insufficient or overshooting processes that modulate each other. From a therapeutic point of view, immunopathology can be prevented by suppressing sterile renal inflammation, a useless atavism with devastating consequences. In addition, it appears as an important goal for the future to promote podocyte and tubular epithelial cell repair, potentially by stimulating the differentiation of their newly discovered intrarenal progenitor cells. By contrast, it is still unclear whether selectively targeting renal fibrogenesis can preserve or bring back lost renal parenchyma, which would be required to maintain or improve kidney function. Thus, renal pathology results from ancient danger responses that evolved because of their evolutional benefits upon trauma. Understanding these causalities may help to shape the search for novel treatments for kidney disease patients.

Genetic polymorphisms of inflammatory molecules in Tunisian kidney transplantation

As chemokines and adhesion molecules play major roles in the process by which leukocytes are recruited from the bloodstream into sites of inflammation, genetic variations in the production or activity of molecules may influence susceptibility to acute rejection episodes. This study sought to determine the impact of recipient monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), chemokine receptor (CCR2, CCR5), and adhesion molecule (ICAM-1, PECAM-1 and L/E selectin) polymorphisms on acute rejection after renal transplantation. We selected 169 healthy blood donors and 173 renal transplant recipients for analysis according to the presence or absence of graft rejection in the first 30 days after transplantation. Using molecular methods DNA was genotyped for 11 polymorphisms of these inflammatory molecules genes. Results were stratified by the incidence of rejection episodes and by human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching. No association was detected between adhesion molecule polymorphisms and the incidence of acute rejection episodes. However, a significant risk of acute renal loss was observed among HLA-identical recipients who possessed the CCR2-64I allele (odds ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.06; P=.035). In conclusion, the observed association of CCR2-64I with acute rejection episodes should be added to the spectrum of immunogenetic factors known to be involved in renal allograft rejection.

Chemokines and their receptors in human renal allotransplantation

BACKGROUND

Chemokines and their receptors play a critical role in leukocyte trafficking, and inhibition of select chemokines has been shown to attenuate kidney disease and allograft rejection in animal models. Therefore, we evaluated chemokine and chemokine receptor transcripts in human renal allograft biopsies, correlating transcript levels with clinical course and immunohistochemical analysis to relate chemokine expression to relevant clinical human disease phenotypes.

METHODS

Renal biopsies were grouped as postreperfusion (n=10), stable function (n=10), subclinical (n=10) or acute rejection (n=17), or calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity (n=9) based on clinical presentation and histopathologic assessment. Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis, chemokine transcripts were assessed relative to transcript levels in preprocurement biopsies from live donor kidneys (n=15).

RESULTS

Transcripts from several inflammatory chemokines (CCL3, CCL5, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11) and chemokine receptors (CCR5, CCR7, and CXCR3) were significantly increased in allografts with subclinical and clinical acute rejection, indicating a strong polarization toward a T-helper 1 effector phenotype during rejection. These transcripts also distinguished acutely rejecting allografts from allografts with nonrejection causes of renal dysfunction. Biopsies from patients with stable function without histologic evidence of rejection had increased chemokine transcript levels that were qualitatively similar but quantitatively reduced compared with rejecting allografts.

CONCLUSIONS

This comprehensive evaluation of chemokines and their receptors in human renal transplantation defines associations between chemokine expression and clinical phenotypes, may have diagnostic utility, and highlights relevant pathways for therapeutic intervention.

Differential regulation of chemokine CCL5 expression in monocytes/macrophages and renal cells by Y-box protein-1

The Y-box protein-1 (YB-1) belongs to the family of cold shock proteins that have pleiotropic functions such as gene transcription, RNA splicing, and mRNA translation. YB-1 has a critical role in atherogenesis due to its regulatory effects on chemokine CCL5 (RANTES) gene transcription in vascular smooth muscle cells. Since CCL5 is a key mediator of kidney transplant rejection, we determined whether YB-1 is involved in allograft rejection by manipulating its expression. In human kidney biopsies, YB-1 transcripts were amplified 17-fold in acute and 21-fold in chronic allograft rejection with a close correlation between CCL5 and YB-1 mRNA expression in both conditions. Among three possible YB-1 binding sites in the CCL5 promoter, a critical element was mapped at -28/-10 bps. This site allowed up-regulation of CCL5 transcription in monocytic THP-1 and HUT78 T-cells and in human primary monocytes; however, it repressed transcription in differentiated macrophages. Conversely, YB-1 knockdown led to decreased CCL5 transcription and secretion in monocytic cells. We show that YB-1 is a cell-type specific regulator of CCL5 expression in infiltrating T-cells and monocytes/macrophages and acts as an adaptive controller of inflammation during kidney allograft rejection.

"To B or not to B?" B-cells and graft rejection

There is increasing evidence that various maturational stages of B-cells infiltrate various solid organ transplants undergoing acute rejection. The presence of immature CD20 and mature CD138 plasma cells associate with more aggressive and steroid-recalcitrant graft rejection and portend poor graft outcomes. Though associative, the causal role of B-cells in graft rejection remains to be better understood. This review discusses the possible roles of B-cells in graft rejection, whether involved as antigen presenting, as indirect effector, or antibody producing cells.

Renal allograft rejection: the contribution of chemokines to the adhesion and retention of alphaE(CD103)beta7 integrin-expressing intratubular T cells

Recruitment of activated T cells to the tubules is a defining feature of cell-mediated renal allograft rejection. Many of these intratubular T cells express the alphaE(CD103)beta7 integrin, potentially allowing adhesion to epithelial cells which express the only defined counter-receptor, E-cadherin. However, the potential of rejection-associated intratubular chemokines to modulate the adhesive function of this integrin has not been investigated. This study demonstrated that CCL7 is expressed within the tubules during renal allograft rejection. Modelling with CD103-expressing MOLT-16 T cells demonstrated chemotactic responses to the chemokines CXCL10, CXCL12, CCL5 and, most significantly, CCL7 (p<0.001); these responses were consistent with the expression of CXCR3, CXCR4 and CCR1 by these cells. A solid-phase adhesion assay showed little background binding of MOLT-16 cells to immobilised human E-cadherin.Fc fusion protein but alphaEbeta7 integrin-specific adhesion was greatly increased by the addition of either Mn2+ or 10nM CCL7 (p<0.01 or <0.001, respectively). Treatment of activated human peripheral T cells with TGFbeta1 for 3 days induced the expression of CD103 on a mean 53% of these cells; a similar proportion of CD103+ and CD103- T cells within these cultures expressed receptors for the chemokine CCL7. CD103+ T cell fractions were sorted from mitogen- or alloantigen-activated, TGFbeta1-treated T cell cultures and also showed specific enhancement of adhesion to E-cadherin.Fc fusion protein following stimulation with Mn2+ or 10nM CCL7 (p<0.01 in all cases); CD103- T cells were not adherent under any conditions. Together these data suggest that although the alphaEbeta7 integrin is induced on activated intratubular T cells by the presence of TGFbeta, the adhesive function of this integrin is promoted by the presence of chemokines such as CCL7, which are also expressed within tubules during renal allograft rejection.