1
|
Jicha C, Pham K. Neuromodulation for primary headache disorders: Advantages and challenges. Headache 2024; 64:226-228. [PMID: 38284241 DOI: 10.1111/head.14671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Crystal Jicha
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
| | - Kendra Pham
- Department of Neurology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Monteith TS, Stark-Inbar A, Shmuely S, Harris D, Garas S, Ironi A, Kalika P, Irwin SL. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) wearable device for adolescents with migraine: a real-world study of high-frequency abortive treatment suggests preventive effects. Front Pain Res (Lausanne) 2023; 4:1247313. [PMID: 38028429 PMCID: PMC10657883 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2023.1247313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Migraine is a chronic neurological disease manifesting as attacks of disabling head pain and associated symptoms. Remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) is a non-pharmacological, prescribed, wearable device (Nerivio®). This device has been certified by the FDA for the acute and/or preventive treatment of migraine with or without aura in patients 12 years of age or older. The device is affixed to the user's arm during 45-min treatment sessions and is operated using a smartphone app. This study (NCT05769322) aims to evaluate whether frequent use of REN for the acute treatment of migraine in adolescents resulted in a reduction in monthly migraine treatment days (MMTD), as previously demonstrated in adults through a dedicated prevention clinical trial (NCT04828707). Methods The study included real-world prospective data from adolescent patients who used REN on at least 10 days every 28-day month, following the REN migraine prevention guideline of an every-other-day pattern. Additional requirements were at least three REN treatment days in each of the two subsequent months. The number of MMTD was used as a proxy measure for the number of monthly migraine days (MMD). The change in MMTD from the first month, taken as a "baseline," to each of the following months was used to evaluate the presence and size of potential migraine preventive benefits of REN in adolescents. Results A total of 83 adolescents were eligible for analysis. The users were 15.9 ± 1.3 years of age (mean ± SD), and 89% of them were female. The results demonstrated a substantial month-to-month reduction in the mean (±SD) number of REN treatment days from 12.6 (±3.2) MMTD in the first month to 9.0 (±4.8) MMTD in the second month (p < 0.001), and a further decrease to 7.4 (±4.2) MMTD in the third month (p < 0.001). This indicates an accumulative reduction of 5.2 (±4.8) mean REN MMTD from the first month to the third month of consecutive REN treatment. The users also reported consistent 2-h acute pain responses in at least 50% of their treated attacks, with 61.9% of the users reported experiencing pain relief, 24.5% reported pain freedom, 67.4% indicated relief in functional disability, and 41.3% reported complete freedom from functional disability. Conclusion The frequent use of REN among adolescents as an acute treatment for migraine attacks resulted in a decrease in the mean number of monthly treatment days in the subsequent months, suggesting that REN may have potential preventive benefits for migraine in this subpopulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Sharon Shmuely
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Dagan Harris
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Sandy Garas
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Alon Ironi
- Clinical Development Department, Theranica, Netanya, Israel
| | - Paige Kalika
- Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Samantha L. Irwin
- Department of Neurology, UCSF Benioff Children’s Hospitals, San Francisco, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blumenfeld AM, Lipton RB, Silberstein S, Tepper SJ, Charleston L, Landy S, Kuruvilla DE, Manack Adams A. Multimodal Migraine Management and the Pursuit of Migraine Freedom: A Narrative Review. Neurol Ther 2023; 12:1533-1551. [PMID: 37542624 PMCID: PMC10444724 DOI: 10.1007/s40120-023-00529-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 07/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a neurologic disease with a complex pathophysiology that can be controlled with current treatment options but not cured. Therefore, treatment expectations are highly variable. The concept of migraine freedom was recently introduced and can mean different things, with some, for example, expecting complete freedom from headache and associated symptoms and others accepting the occasional migraine attack if it does not impact functioning. Therefore, migraine management should be optimized so that patients can have the best opportunity to achieve their optimal treatment goals. With migraine freedom as a goal and, given the complex pathophysiology of migraine and the high incidence of comorbidities among individuals with migraine, treatment with a single modality may be insufficient, as it may not achieve migraine freedom in those with more frequent or disabling attacks. In this clinical perspective article, we have identified four key, partially overlapping principles of multimodal migraine treatment: (1) manage common comorbidities; (2) control modifiable risk factors for progression by addressing medication and caffeine overuse; (3) diagnose and treat secondary causes of headache, if present; and (4) individualize acute and preventive treatments to minimize pain, functional disability, and allodynia. There are many barriers to pursuing migraine freedom, and strategies to overcome them should be optimized. Migraine freedom should be an aspirational goal both at the individual attack level and for the disease overall. We believe that a comprehensive and multimodal approach that addresses all barriers people with migraine face could move patients closer to migraine freedom.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Stewart J Tepper
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Larry Charleston
- Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tepper SJ, Rabany L, Cowan RP, Smith TR, Grosberg BM, Torphy BD, Harris D, Vizel M, Ironi A, Stark-Inbar A, Blumenfeld AM. Remote electrical neuromodulation for migraine prevention: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Headache 2023; 63:377-389. [PMID: 36704988 DOI: 10.1111/head.14469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical efficacy of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN), used every other day, for the prevention of migraine. BACKGROUND Preventive treatment is key to managing migraine, but it is often underutilized. REN, a non-pharmacological acute treatment for migraine, was evaluated as a method of migraine prevention in patients with episodic and chronic migraine. METHODS We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center trial, with 1:1 ratio. The study consisted of a 4-week baseline observation phase, and an 8-week double-blind intervention phase in which participants used either REN or a placebo stimulation every other day. Throughout the study, participants reported their symptoms daily, via an electronic diary. RESULTS Two hundred forty-eight participants were randomized (128 active, 120 placebo), of which 179 qualified for the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) analysis (95 active; 84 placebo). REN was superior to placebo in the primary endpoint, change in mean number of migraine days per month from baseline, with mean reduction of 4.0 ± SD of 4.0 days (1.3 ± 4.0 in placebo, therapeutic gain = 2.7 [confidence interval -3.9 to -1.5], p < 0.001). The significance was maintained when analyzing the episodic (-3.2 ± 3.4 vs. -1.0 ± 3.6, p = 0.003) and chronic (-4.7 ± 4.4 vs. -1.6 ± 4.4, p = 0.001) migraine subgroups separately. REN was also superior to placebo in reduction of moderate/severe headache days (3.8 ± 3.9 vs. 2.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.005), reduction of headache days of all severities (4.5 ± 4.1 vs. 1.8 ± 4.6, p < 0.001), percentage of patients achieving 50% reduction in moderate/severe headache days (51.6% [49/95] vs. 35.7% [30/84], p = 0.033), and reduction in days of acute medication intake (3.5 ± 4.1 vs. 1.4 ± 4.3, p = 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the ITT analysis. No serious device-related adverse events were reported in any group. CONCLUSION Applied every other day, REN is effective and safe for the prevention of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart J Tepper
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | | | - Robert P Cowan
- Division of Headache Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | | | | | - Bradley D Torphy
- Chicago Headache Center and Research Institute, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - Maya Vizel
- Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd., Netanya, Israel
| | - Alon Ironi
- Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd., Netanya, Israel
| | | | - Andrew M Blumenfeld
- The Los Angeles Headache Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
- San Diego Headache Center, San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Esparham A, Stark-Inbar A, Jekel L, Tamir S, Rabany L, Ironi A, Gautreaux J, Rao R. Acute Treatment of Migraine in Adolescents: Real-World Analysis of Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN). Pediatr Neurol 2023; 142:51-5. [PMID: 36931109 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Nearly 10% of children and adolescents in the United States experience migraine. Pharmacologic treatment of migraine in adolescents is limited due to only few US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medications, limited efficacy, or lack of tolerability. Remote Electrical Neuromodulation (REN) is a nonpharmacologic abortive treatment for migraine, cleared by the FDA for patients aged 12 years and above. This study evaluated real-world efficacy of REN in adolescents aged 12 to 17 years. Real-world data were collected from patients aged 12 to 17 years treated with the REN device (Nerivio) from January 1, 2021, to May 31, 2022. Study's end points included consistent efficacy two hours after treatment, use of REN as a standalone versus as an adjunct therapy, treatment intensity, and safety. Of 1629 adolescents included in the study, consistent response in at least 50% of treatments at two hours posttreatment was achieved by 60.3% of patients for pain relief, 26.3% for pain freedom, 66.3% for functional disability relief, and 41.2% for functional disability freedom. Of 2365 treatments in which medication usage was reported, REN was used as standalone therapy in 64.4% of the treatments, REN was combined with over-the-counter medications in 18.6%, and it was combined with prescription medications in 17%. Mean treatment intensity from 13,716 treatments was 28.5% (±13.6%) of the max stimulator output. Only three device-related adverse events were reported, all minor. This real-world analysis demonstrates the persistent efficacy of REN for abortive treatment of migraine in adolescents, extending findings of prior clinical trials in adolescents and real-world studies in adults.
Collapse
|
6
|
Grosberg B, Rabany L, Vizel M, Ironi A, Harris D, Stark-Inbar A, Smith TR. Effectiveness comparison of remote electrical neuromodulation and standard-care medications for acute treatment of chronic migraine: a post-hoc analysis. Pain Manag 2022; 12:837-844. [PMID: 36097974 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2022-0053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: The current study compared the effectiveness of remote electrical neuromodulation (REN) to that of standard-care medications for acute treatments of migraine, using a within-subjects design. Materials & methods: Post-hoc within-subject analysis was performed on data from 78 adult chronic migraine patients who participated in a clinical trial with REN, on four end points: single-treatment pain relief, single-treatment pain freedom, consistency of pain relief and consistency of pain freedom. Results: No statistical differences were found between REN and the tested medications, in any of the effectiveness outcomes: single-treatment pain relief p = 0.056, single-treatment pain freedom p = 0.532, consistency of pain relief p = 0.369, consistency of pain freedom p = 1.00. Conclusion: The results suggest that REN may provide an effective non-pharmacological alternative for standard care abortive medications in individuals impacted by chronic migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Grosberg
- Hartford Hospital, 65 Memorial Rd #508, West Hartford, CT 06107, USA
| | - Liron Rabany
- Theranica Bio-Electronics, Ha'Omanut St. 4, Netanya, 4250438, Israel
| | - Maya Vizel
- Theranica Bio-Electronics, Ha'Omanut St. 4, Netanya, 4250438, Israel
| | - Alon Ironi
- Theranica Bio-Electronics, Ha'Omanut St. 4, Netanya, 4250438, Israel
| | - Dagan Harris
- Theranica Bio-Electronics, Ha'Omanut St. 4, Netanya, 4250438, Israel
| | - Alit Stark-Inbar
- Theranica Bio-Electronics, Ha'Omanut St. 4, Netanya, 4250438, Israel
| | - Timothy R Smith
- StudyMetrix Research, LLC 3862 Mexico Rd, St. Peters, MO 63303, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Nierenburg H, Stark-Inbar A. Nerivio ® remote electrical neuromodulation for acute treatment of chronic migraine. Pain Manag 2021; 12:267-281. [PMID: 34538078 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Nerivio® (by Theranica Bio-Electronics Ltd, Tel Aviv, Israel) is a wireless, wearable, noninvasive, battery-operated, remote electrical neuromodulation device controlled by a smartphone application. It is US FDA authorized for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in people 12 years and older in the US, and European Conformity (CE) marked for the same indication in the EU. The American Headache Society Consensus Statement recommends Nerivio as a tier 2 treatment for migraines. This review summarizes a series of five independent clinical trials and two real-world evidence studies that established safety, tolerability and efficacy of Nerivio in treating migraine attacks. It further provides up-to-date practical information on device usability. Based on findings of this review, Nerivio offers a safe and effective nonpharmacological alternative for acute treatment in patients with chronic (and nonchronic) migraine.
Collapse
|