• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
  • Find an Author
Download
For: Morán P, Chevalier M, Ten JI, Fernández Soto JM, Vañó E. A survey of patient dose and clinical factors in a full-field digital mammography system. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2005;114:375-9. [PMID: 15933140 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch514] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Parmaksız A, Ataç GK, Bulur E, İnal T, Alhan A. AVERAGE GLANDULAR DOSES AND NATIONAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN MAMMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS IN TURKEY. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2020;190:100-107. [PMID: 32556186 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2020] [Revised: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 05/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
2
Acho SN, Boonzaier WPE, Nel IF. EXPOSURE PARAMETERS OF MAMMOGRAMS WITH AND WITHOUT MASS LESIONS FROM A SOUTH AFRICAN BREAST CARE CENTRE. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017;177:348-355. [PMID: 28444247 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
3
Alakhras MM, Mello-Thoms C, Bourne R, Rickard M, Diffey J, Brennan PC. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RADIATION DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2017;173:351-360. [PMID: 26895769 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncw005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2015] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
4
Baek JE, Kang BJ, Kim SH, Lee HS. Radiation dose affected by mammographic composition and breast size: first application of a radiation dose management system for full-field digital mammography in Korean women. World J Surg Oncol 2017;15:38. [PMID: 28153022 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-017-1107-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]  Open
5
Suleiman ME, McEntee MF, Cartwright L, Diffey J, Brennan PC. Diagnostic reference levels for digital mammography in New South Wales. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2016;61:48-57. [DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.12540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
6
Suleiman ME, Brennan PC, McEntee MF. Diagnostic reference levels in digital mammography: a systematic review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015;167:608-619. [PMID: 25543130 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2014] [Accepted: 12/03/2014] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
7
Kelaranta A, Toroi P, Timonen M, Komssi S, Kortesniemi M. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2015;164:342-353. [PMID: 25114321 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
8
Kawaguchi A, Matsunaga Y, Otsuka T, Suzuki S. Patient investigation of average glandular dose and incident air kerma for digital mammography. Radiol Phys Technol 2013;7:102-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s12194-013-0239-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2013] [Revised: 10/20/2013] [Accepted: 10/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
9
Borg M, Badr I, Royle GJ. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2013;156:168-183. [PMID: 23525916 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
10
Vano E, Ten JI, Fernandez-soto JM, Sanchez-casanueva RM. Experience With Patient Dosimetry and Quality Control Online for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Using DICOM Services. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;200:783-90. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.12.10179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
11
Chen B, Wang Y, Sun X, Guo W, Zhao M, Cui G, Hu L, Li P, Ren Y, Feng J, Yu J. Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:868-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2011] [Accepted: 02/10/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
12
Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Kwon D, Linet MS. Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present). Radiat Res 2012;177:92-108. [PMID: 21988547 PMCID: PMC3876279 DOI: 10.1667/rr2241.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
13
Hauge IHR, Pedersen K, Sanderud A, Hofvind S, Olerud HM. Patient doses from screen-film and full-field digital mammography in a population-based screening programme. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2012;148:65-73. [PMID: 21335333 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
14
Alizadeh Riabi H, Mehnati P, Mesbahi A. Evaluation of mean glandular dose in a full-field digital mammography unit in Tabriz, Iran. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;142:222-227. [PMID: 20823039 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncq218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
15
Elbakri IA, McIntosh BJ, Rickey DW. Physical characterization and performance comparison of active- and passive-pixel CMOS detectors for mammography. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:1743-55. [PMID: 19242050 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/6/022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
16
Mettler FA, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT, Mahesh M. Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 2008;248:254-63. [PMID: 18566177 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2481071451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1303] [Impact Index Per Article: 81.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
17
Thierens H, Bosmans H, Buls N, De Hauwere A, Bacher K, Jacobs J, Clerinx P. Typetesting of physical characteristics of digital mammography systems for screening within the Flemish breast cancer screening programme. Eur J Radiol 2008;70:539-48. [PMID: 18374533 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.01.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2007] [Accepted: 01/28/2008] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
18
Fischmann A. Full-field Digital Mammography versus Film-screen Mammography. Cancer Imaging 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-012374212-4.50038-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]  Open
19
Elbakri IA, Tesic MM, Xiong Q. Physical characterization of a high-resolution CCD detector for mammography. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:2171-83. [PMID: 17404462 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/8/009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 1 1Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA