Continued lamivudine versus delavirdine in combination with indinavir and zidovudine or stavudine in lamivudine-experienced patients: results of Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 370

Tenofovir in second-line ART in Zambia and South Africa: collaborative analysis of cohort studies

OBJECTIVES

Tenofovir (TDF) is increasingly used in second-line antiretroviral treatment (ART) in sub-Saharan Africa. We compared outcomes of second-line ART containing and not containing TDF in cohort studies from Zambia and the Republic of South Africa (RSA).

METHODS

Patients aged 16 years and older starting protease-inhibitor-based second-line ART in Zambia (1 cohort) and RSA (5 cohorts) were included. We compared mortality, immunological failure (all cohorts), and virological failure (RSA only) between patients receiving and not receiving TDF. Competing risk models and Cox models adjusted for age, sex, CD4 count, time on first-line ART, and calendar year were used to analyze mortality and treatment failure, respectively. Hazard ratios (HRs) were combined in fixed-effects meta-analysis.

FINDINGS

1687 patients from Zambia and 1556 patients from RSA, including 1350 (80.0%) and 206 (13.2%) patients starting TDF, were followed over 4471 person-years. Patients on TDF were more likely to have started second-line ART in recent years and had slightly higher baseline CD4 counts than patients not on TDF. Overall, 127 patients died, 532 were lost to follow-up, and 240 patients developed immunological failure. In RSA, 94 patients had virologic failure. Combined HRs comparing TDF with other regimens were 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41 to 0.87) for immunologic failure and 0.63 (0.38-1.05) for mortality. The HR for virologic failure in RSA was 0.28 (0.09-0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

In this observational study, patients on TDF-containing second-line ART were less likely to develop treatment failure than patients on other regimens. TDF seems to be an effective component of second-line ART in southern Africa.

Optimizing measurement of self-reported adherence with the ACTG Adherence Questionnaire: a cross-protocol analysis. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007;46:402-409. [PMID: 18077832 DOI: 10.1097/qai.0b013e318158a44f]

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) Adherence Questionnaire is used extensively, but investigators frequently only use the first item of the questionnaire (4-day recall).

DESIGN/METHODS

A secondary analysis was conducted to (1) estimate the validity and reliability of each of the 5 scale items and (2) compare the approach commonly used to summarize adherence data collected with the instrument (average 4-day recall) with alternate approaches derived using principal component (PC) analysis and the full questionnaire. We hypothesized that an estimate of adherence taking all items of the questionnaire into account would provide a stronger measure of adherence.

RESULTS

Logistic regression analyses showed that the first PC identified (PC1) was significantly correlated with plasma HIV RNA outcome (P < 0.0001 for ACTG 370 data and P = 0.006 for ACTG 398 data) and correlated with plasma HIV RNA better than average 4-day recall. An adherence index formulated using weights of PC1 showed substantially greater variability in the range of adherence scores in comparison to average 4-day adherence recall alone. PC1 compared favorably with 2 indices derived from medication event monitoring system data as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings indicate that a superior assessment of antiretroviral adherence may be obtained with the ACTG Adherence Questionnaire by using the method employed in this analysis.

Rate of Thymidine Analogue Resistance Mutation Accumulation With Zidovudine- or Stavudine-Based Regimens

Zidovudine (ZDV) and stavudine (d4T) select for the same set of thymidine analogue resistance mutations (TAMs). To compare the rate at which TAMs emerge, genotypic analysis of HIV-1 was performed on serial plasma samples from treatment-naive subjects randomly assigned to receive ZDV or d4T in combination with lamivudine. After 72 weeks of follow-up, TAMs were detected in samples from 50% of ZDV-treated subjects and 45% of d4T-treated subjects (P = 0.79). The frequency of K70R and T215Y or F mutations was similar in both groups, although M41L was observed more frequently in samples from ZDV-treated subjects. This randomized study shows that TAMs accumulate at similar rates during treatment with ZDV or d4T, but the specific pattern of mutations may differ somewhat in patients treated with these thymidine analogues.

Estimating and Comparing Reduction in HIV-1 RNA in Clinical Trials Using Methods for Interval Censored Data

The magnitude of reduction in HIV-1 RNA levels provides an important complement to the end point based on the percentage of patients achieving HIV-1 RNA levels below a threshold value. Analyses and interpretation of this end point, however, is difficult due to the lower limit of quantification. Crude methods of analyzing HIV-1 RNA data provide biased estimates of the HIV-1 RNA reduction. Censored methods that take into account the censoring of HIV-1 RNA measurements by the limit of quantification greatly improve the analysis of HIV-1 RNA reduction end points. It was shown, however, that when there is a high percentage of censoring, those methods can overestimate HIV-1 RNA reduction. We suggest going a step further, considering that HIV-1 RNA reduction is left-censored by the limit of quantification and right-bounded by the HIV-1 RNA levels at baseline. We then suggest using nonparametric and parametric methods introduced for interval-censored data to analyze such data. A convenient feature of the methodology is the ability to easily handle missing HIV-1 RNA data, although some assumptions are required. For instance, the HIV-1 RNA reduction can be estimated using the so-called "missing = failure" scenario. Graphic procedures to check the validity of using parametric methods are described. The methods are discussed and illustrated with data of 2 recent clinical trials. Surprisingly, it was found that the log10 transformation of the HIV-1 RNA reduction was not appropriate in our data.

Virological significance, prevalence and genetic basis of hypersusceptibility to nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) are used to treat HIV-infected individuals in combination with nucleoside analogues (NRTI) and protease inhibitors. Long-term treatment with antiretroviral agents results in the emergence of strains with decreased susceptibility (resistance) to the drugs and is one of the major factors in loss of drug efficacy. Conversely, there have been recent reports of HIV strains with increased susceptibility (hypersusceptibility) to NNRTIs. These isolates emerge in patients on long-term antiretroviral therapy particularly in individuals receiving NRTIs. The prevalence of NNRTI hypersusceptibility ranges between 17.5 and 50% in NRTI-treatment experienced compared to 10% in NRTI-naïve patients. There is an inverse correlation between NNRTI hypersusceptibility and phenotypic NRTI resistance and a direct correlation between the number of NRTI resistance mutations present in the HIV reverse transcriptase. Re-sensitisation of phenotypic NNRTI resistance has been reported by NRTI mutations and is not likely to be detected using genotypic resistance assays. Recent studies demonstrate that NNRTI hypersusceptible virus at baseline is likely to predict better virological outcomes in patients on NNRTI-based salvage regimens compared to patients with NNRTI susceptible virus. These studies have implications for the sequence of antiretroviral drug use where patients may benefit from NRTI therapy before the introduction of NNRTIs, however more studies are needed to examine this treatment rationale.

Efficacy of zidovudine compared to stavudine, both in combination with lamivudine and indinavir, in human immunodeficiency virus-infected nucleoside-experienced patients with no prior exposure to lamivudine, stavudine, or protease inhibitors (novavir trial)

We compared the efficacy and the toxicity of zidovudine (AZT) versus stavudine (d4T), in combination with lamivudine (3TC) and indinavir, in AZT-, dideoxyinosine (ddI)-, and/or dideoxycytosine (ddC)-experienced patients in a randomized comparative multicenter trial. One hundred seventy human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1)-infected patients, who had received AZT, ddI, and/or ddC for at least 6 months but were naive for d4T, 3TC, and protease inhibitors, were randomized to AZT at 250 to 300 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h or to d4T at 40 mg twice daily, 3TC at 150 mg twice daily, and indinavir at 800 mg every 8 h. The primary endpoint was time to virological failure, defined as plasma HIV-1 RNA levels of >5,000 copies/ml after at least 8 weeks of antiretroviral therapy. Additional endpoints were change from baseline in CD4 cell counts, AIDS-defining events and adverse events, and proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml and HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml. At week 80, 15 patients in the AZT arm and 14 patients in the d4T arm had reached the primary endpoint, and time to virological failure did not differ between the two arms (P = 0.98). In the d4T and in the AZT arms, 67 and 73% of patients, respectively, had HIV-1 RNA levels of <500 copies/ml (P = 0.50). The median change from baseline in CD4 cell count was 195 x 10(6) and 175 x 10(6)/liter for the d4T- and AZT-containing arms, respectively. The proportions of patients with HIV-1 RNA levels of <50 copies/ml at weeks 8, 16, and 24 were similar in the two arms. The occurrence of serious adverse events was not significantly different between arms. In conclusion, in these patients heavily pretreated with AZT, switching from AZT to d4T when initiating indinavir and 3TC did not bring any additional benefit compared to maintaining AZT.

On the use of magnitude of reduction in HIV-1 RNA in clinical trials: statistical analysis and potential biases

Clinical trials endpoints based on magnitude of reduction in HIV-1 RNA levels provide an important complement to endpoints based on either virologic failure or a proportion of patients having HIV-1 RNA levels below a threshold value. However, reductions in HIV-1 RNA often are not completely observed, because many patients have HIV-1 RNA levels below the limit of quantification at the primary follow-up visit. The crude method of analyzing such data is to define all HIV-1 RNA levels that fall below the limit of quantification as being equal to that limit of quantification. This method is widely used even though the underestimation inherent in such a method may also lead to underestimation of treatment difference in terms of HIV-1 RNA reduction. Analyses based on Kaplan-Meier method and censored regression can be used to estimate such a reduction. When a high percentage of patients have HIV-1 RNA levels below the limit of quantification at the time of primary follow-up, which corresponds to censored observations, the Kaplan-Meier method does not always provide an estimate of the median HIV-1 RNA reduction. We discuss a statistical method to provide lower and upper limits of such median reduction or of other percentiles of reduction. We found that when the percentage of censoring is high, the censored method may overestimate the HIV-1 RNA reduction and then may also overestimate the treatment difference. Although the censored method is preferable to the crude method, when the level of censoring is high, we suggest computation of the upper and lower limits either to provide a range of potential values of HIV-1 RNA reduction or to detect overestimation by the censored method.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.

Consequences and Determinants of Adherence to Antiretroviral Medication: Results from Adult Aids Clinical Trials Group Protocol 370

Objectives

(1) To document rates and patterns of adherence from enrollment until week 24 of an AIDS clinical trial; (2) to examine the association of adherence to clinical end-points including plasma HIV-1 RNA level and CD4 cell count; and (3) to identify predictors of adherence from clinical, behavioural, psychosocial and demographic factors.

Design

Sub-study of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, comparison-controlled trial; 21 collaborating units of the Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group. Observational, prospective analysis.

Methods

Ninety-three subjects with baseline plasma HIV-1 RNA levels >500 copies/ml, who completed clinical assessment, plasma HIV-1 RNA titres and CD4 cell counts at study entry, weeks 2, 4 and every 4 weeks thereafter until week 24. All patients were antiretroviral-experienced but were naive to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and protease inhibitors. Self-reported adherence to antiretroviral therapies prescribed as part of the trial was assessed every 4 weeks from trial, week 4 until week 24.

Results

Average adherence was high, with 63% of subjects reporting >95% adherence across the trial. However, there was a significant decline in adherence over time on trial. After controlling for potential confounding variables, patients who were less than 95% adherent to medications were 3.5-times more likely to have treatment failure (HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/ml) than subjects with adherence rates of 95–100%. The strongest predictor of adherence was adverse clinical events (for example, dermatological, gastrointestinal symptoms): patients with adverse events were 12.8-times less likely to have 95–100% adherence. Other clinical, demographic, psychosocial and behavioural factors were also significant predictors of adherence.

Conclusions

Adherence influences virological outcome even in AIDS clinical trials where overall adherence rates are high and should therefore be monitored in future trials. Intervention may be warranted to enhance adherence for subjects who have early toxicities, express concern about taking medications as directed, and for women and minorities.

Delavirdine: clinical pharmacokinetics and drug interactions

Delavirdine, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), is a potent and specific inhibitor of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. The approved therapeutic regimen for delavirdine is 400mg 3 times daily in combination with appropriate antiretroviral agents; however, a dose of 600mg twice daily appears to provide similar systemic exposure. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of delavirdine are not appreciably affected by food. Delavirdine undergoes extensive metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) with little urinary excretion of unchanged drug. Metabolic drug interactions between delavirdine and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors are unlikely as their metabolic pathways differ; delavirdine has no effect on the pharmacokinetics of zidovudine. Concomitant use of CYP inducers, such as rifampicin (rifampin), rifabutin, phenytoin, phenobarbital or carbamazepine, should be avoided since delavirdine plasma concentrations are significantly lowered. Reduction in gastric acidity (pH > 3) decreases the extent of delavirdine absorption, so administration of antacids and the buffered formulations of didanosine should be separated from that of delavirdine by at least 1 hour. Delavirdine, unlike other currently available NNRTI agents, is an inhibitor rather than an inducer of CYP isozymes. Consequently, the drug interaction profile and rationale for combining delavirdine with other antiretroviral agents is unique among the current NNRTI agents. Delavirdine inhibits the CYP3A4-mediated metabolism of HIV protease inhibitors and thereby increases systemic exposure to protease inhibitors. The ability of delavirdine to enhance the pharmacokinetic profiles of protease inhibitors may permit the use of simplified administration regimens. Combining delavirdine and indinavir removes the food restrictions during indinavir administration. Furthermore, the superior virological response observed in antiretroviral regimens containing delavirdine and protease inhibitors has been attributed to the favourable pharmacokinetic interactions and the introduction of a new drug class in NNRTI-naïve therapy-experienced patients. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions are an important consideration in selecting an HIV treatment regimen, due to the multiplicity of drugs that are coadministered and the varying direction and magnitude of interaction that can occur. Considerations for utilising delavirdine in a treatment regimen are different than for other NNRTI agents due to the unique drug interaction profile of delavirdine.

Combination therapy with indinavir, ritonavir, and delavirdine and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in patients with HIV/AIDS who have failed multiple antiretroviral combinations

PURPOSE

Ritonavir (RTV) and delavirdine (DLV) are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, the specific CYP that metabolizes indinavir (IDV). We hypothesized that patients who have failed multiple therapies containing protease inhibitors would still respond to IDV if high plasma concentrations were achieved. We retrospectively examined the antiviral efficacy of the combination of RTV, DLV, and IDV in heavily antiretroviral-experienced patients.

METHOD

A chart review of patients treated with IDV/RTV/DLV and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) drugs was performed. Only patients who failed at least three highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens and remained on IDV/RTV/DLV therapy for at least 2 months were included. Plasma concentrations for IDV and RTV were obtained if patients were still on therapy.

RESULTS

Ten participants were identified who qualified for this study. The median plasma HIV RNA prior to initiating IDV/RTV/DLV was 359,300 copies/mL. Nine of the 10 patients had failed nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens in the past. Eight out of 10 patients had at reduction in HIV RNA. Four of eight patients maintained the 1 log(10) reduction in HIV RNA past 6 months. Mean CD4 cell count increased from 142+/-99 to 273+/-126 cells/mm(3). Genotypic data available on six patients showed multiple protease gene mutations. Plasma concentration of IDV in three patients (two troughs and one 7 hours postdose) were >1,000 ng/mL.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that in heavily antiretroviral drug-treated patients, partial antiretroviral response to RTV/IDV/DLV can still be achieved. The use of IDV/RTV/DLV and two NRTIs as salvage therapy has merit in patients who have no viable treatment options. A prospective trial utilizing this drug combination is warranted.

Delavirdine: a review of its use in HIV infection

Delavirdine, a bisheteroarylpiperazine derivative, is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that allosterically binds to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase, inhibiting both the RNA- and DNA-directed DNA polymerase functions of the enzyme. Delavirdine in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) produced sustained reductions in plasma viral loads and improvements in immunological responses in large randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of 48 to 54 weeks' duration. In patients with advanced HIV infection, triple therapy with delavirdine, zidovudine and lamivudine, didanosine or zalcitabine for 1 year significantly prolonged the time to virological failure compared with dual therapy (delavirdine plus zidovudine or 2 NRTIs; p < 0.0001). After 50 weeks' treatment, plasma HIV RNA levels were below the limit of detection (LOD; <50 copies/ml) for 40% of patients receiving triple therapy but for only 6% of those receiving dual NRTI therapy. Preliminary results suggest that delavirdine also has beneficial effects on surrogate markers as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple regimens. At 16 to 48 weeks, the minimum mean reduction in plasma viral load from baseline was 2.5 log10 copies/ml and mean CD4+ counts increased by 100 to 313 cells/microl. The proportion of patients with plasma HIV RNAlevels below the LOD (usually 200 to 500 copies/ml) ranged from 48 to 100% after > or = 16 weeks. Delavirdine was also effective as a component of saquinavir soft gel capsule-containing salvage regimens. Since delavirdine shares a common metabolic pathway (cytochrome P450 3A pathway) with other NNRTIs, HIV protease inhibitors and several drugs used to treat opportunistic infections in patients infected with HIV, the drug is associated with a number of pharmacokinetic interactions. Some of these drug interactions are clinically significant, necessitating dosage adjustments or avoidance of co-administration. Delavirdine is not recommended for use with lovastatin, simvastatin, rifabutin, rifampicin, sildenafil, ergot derivatives, quinidine, midazolam, carbamazepine, phenobarbital or phenytoin. Importantly, the drug favourably increases the plasma concentration of several protease inhibitors. Delavirdine is generally well tolerated. Skin rash is the most frequently reported adverse effect, occurring in 18 to 50% of patients receiving delavirdine-containing combination therapy in clinical trials. Although a high proportion of patients developed a rash, it was typically mild to moderate in intensity, did not result in discontinuation or adjustment of treatment in most patients and resolved quickly. The occurrence of Stevens-Johnson syndrome was rare (1 case in 1,000 patients). A retrospective analysis of pooled clinical trial data indicated that there was no significant difference in the incidence of liver toxicity, liver failure or noninfectious hepatitis between delavirdine-containing and non-delavirdine-containing antiretroviral treatment groups. In addition, the incidence of lipodystrophy, metabolic lipid disorders, hyperglycaemia and hypertriglyceridaemia was not significantly different between these 2 treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In combination with NRTIs. delavirdine produces sustained improvements in surrogate markers of HIV disease and prolongs the time to virological failure in adult patients with HIV infection. Preliminary data of delavirdine as a component of protease inhibitor-containing triple or quadruple highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens indicate that patients achieve marked improvements in virological and immunological markers. The drug is generally well tolerated, with a transient skin rash, typically of mild to moderate intensity, being the most common adverse effect. Delavirdine is an effective component of recommended antiretroviral treatment strategies for adult patients with HIV infection and, in combination with 2 NRTIs as a first-line therapy, the drug has the advantage of sparing protease inhibitors for subsequent use. Since delavirdine favourably increases plasma concentrations of several protease inhibitors, the drug may also be beneficial as a component of salvage therapy in combination with protease inhibitors.