Biomechanical evaluation of anterior and posterior fixations in an unstable calf spine model

A comparative study of two reconstruction procedures for osteoporotic vertebral fracture with lumbar spinal stenosis: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion versus posterior and anterior and combined surgery

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) with neurological deficit due to osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) has been controversial. We assessed the usefulness, safety, and efficacy of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) for LSS with neurological deficit due to OVFs and compared this procedure to posterior/anterior combined surgery (PACS).

METHODS

Of 36 consecutive patients with LSS with neurological deficit due to OVFs, 15 underwent PLIF (6 males, 9 females; mean age, 74 years), and 21 underwent PACS (4 males, 17 females; mean age, 70 years). Surgical complications, clinical outcomes (operative time, blood loss, American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale [AIS], activities of daily living [ADLs]), and sagittal alignment were investigated. Bony fusion was assessed using plain and functional X-rays and computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in age, sex, or disease or follow-up duration between the groups. Operative time was significantly shorter and intraoperative blood loss significantly less in the PLIF than in the PACS groups. AIS and ADL improved significantly postoperatively in both groups. No significant difference was observed in neurological improvement, correction angle, loss of correction, and surgical complications. No pseudarthrosis occurred, and no patient required additional surgery in the PLIF group.

CONCLUSIONS

PLIF for LSS with neurological deficit due to OVFs achieves posterior rigid fixation with instrumentation, anterior column reconstruction by interbody fusion, and adequate decompression using a single posterior approach. This less invasive procedure is a useful reconstructive surgery option.

Comparison of Cervical Spine Anatomy in Calves, Pigs and Humans

Background Context

Animals are commonly used to model the human spine for in vitro and in vivo experiments. Many studies have investigated similarities and differences between animals and humans in the lumbar and thoracic vertebrae. However, a quantitative anatomic comparison of calf, pig, and human cervical spines has not been reported.

Purpose

To compare fundamental structural similarities and differences in vertebral bodies from the cervical spines of commonly used experimental animal models and humans.

Study Design

Anatomical morphometric analysis was performed on cervical vertebra specimens harvested from humans and two common large animals (i.e., calves and pigs).

Methods

Multiple morphometric parameters were directly measured from cervical spine specimens of twelve pigs, twelve calves and twelve human adult cadavers. The following anatomical parameters were measured: vertebral body width (VBW), vertebral body depth (VBD), vertebral body height (VBH), spinal canal width (SCW), spinal canal depth (SCD), pedicle width (PW), pedicle depth (PD), pedicle inclination (PI), dens width (DW), dens depth (DD), total vertebral width (TVW), and total vertebral depth (TVD).

Results

The atlantoaxial (C1–2) joint in pigs is similar to that in humans and could serve as a human substitute. The pig cervical spine is highly similar to the human cervical spine, except for two large transverse processes in the anterior regions ofC4–C6. The width and depth of the calf odontoid process were larger than those in humans. VBW and VBD of calf cervical vertebrae were larger than those in humans, but the spinal canal was smaller. Calf C7 was relatively similar to human C7, thus, it may be a good substitute.

Conclusion

Pig cervical vertebrae were more suitable human substitutions than calf cervical vertebrae, especially with respect to C1, C2, and C7. The biomechanical properties of nerve vascular anatomy and various segment functions in pig and calf cervical vertebrae must be considered when selecting an animal model for research on the spine.

Contribution of Round vs. Rectangular Expandable Cage Endcaps to Spinal Stability in a Cadaveric Corpectomy Model

BACKGROUND

Expandable cages are gaining popularity in anterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine following corpectomy as they can provide adjustable distraction and deformity correction. Rectangular, rather than circular, endcaps provide increased resistance to subsidence by spanning the apophyseal ring; however their impact on construct stability is not known. The objective of this study was to investigate the contribution of expandable corpectomy cage endcap shape (round vs. rectangular) and fixation method (anterior plate vs. posterior pedicle screws) to the stability of an L1 sub-total corpectomy construct.

METHODS

Eight fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens (T11-L3) were subjected to multi-directional flexibility testing to 6 N·m with a custom spine simulator. Test conditions were: intact, L1 sub-total corpectomy defect, expandable cage (round endcap) alone, expandable cage (round endcap) with anterior plate, expandable cage (round endcap) with bilateral pedicle screws, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) alone, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) with anterior plate, expandable cage (rectangular endcap) with bilateral pedicle screws. Range-of-motion across T12-L2 was measured with an optoelectronic system.

RESULTS

The expandable cage alone with either endcap provided significant stability to the corpectomy defect, reducing motion to intact levels in flexion-extension with both endcap types, and in lateral bending with rectangular endcaps. Round endcaps allowed greater motion than intact in lateral bending, and axial rotation ROM was greater than intact for both endcaps. Supplemental fixation provided the most rigid constructs, although there were no significant differences between instrumentation or endcap types.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest anterior-only fixation may be adequate when using an expandable cage in a sub-total corpectomy application and choice of endcap type may be driven by other factors such as subsidence resistance.

Is lateral stabilization enough in thoracolumbar burst fracture reconstruction? A biomechanical investigation

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Traditional reconstruction for burst fractures involves columnar support with posterior fixation at one or two levels cephalad/caudad; however, some surgeons choose to only stabilize the vertebral column.

PURPOSE

The aim was to distinguish biomechanical differences in stability between a burst fracture stabilized through a lateral approach using corpectomy spacers of different end plate sizes with and without integrated screws and with and without posterior fixation.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This was an in vitro biomechanical study assessing thoracolumbar burst fracture stabilization.

METHODS

Six human spines (T11-L3) were tested on a six-degrees-of-freedom simulator enabling unconstrained range of motion (ROM) at ±6 N·m in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR) after a simulated burst fracture at L1. Expandable corpectomy spacers with/without integrated screws (Fi/F; FORTIFY Integrated/FORTIFY; Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA, USA) were tested with different end plate sizes (21×23 mm, 22×40-50 mm). Posterior instrumentation (PI) via bilateral pedicle screws and rods was used one level above and one level below the burst fracture. Lateral plate (LP) fixation was tested. Devices were tested in the following order: intact; Fi21×23; Fi21×23+PI; F21×23+PI+LP; F21×23+LP; F22×40-50+LP; F22×40-50+PI+LP; Fi22×40-50+PI; Fi22×40-50.

RESULTS

In FE and AR, constructs without PI showed no significant difference (p<.05) in stability compared with intact. In LB, F22×40-50+LP showed a significant increase in stability relative to intact, but no other construct without PI reached significance. In FE and LB, circumferential constructs were significantly more stable than intact. In AR, no construct showed significant differences in motion when compared with the intact condition.

CONCLUSIONS

Constructs without posterior fixation were the least stable of all tested constructs. Circumferential fixation provided greater stability in FE and LB than lateral fixation and intact. Axial rotation showed no significant differences in any construct compared with the intact state.

Biomechanical stability of transverse connectors in the setting of a thoracic pedicle subtraction osteotomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Transverse connectors (TCs) are often used to improve the rigidity of posterior spinal instrumentation as previous investigations have suggested that TCs enhance torsional rigidity in long-segment thoracic constructs. Posterior osteotomies, such as pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), are used in severe thoracic deformities and provide a significant amount of correction; as a consequence, however, PSOs also induce three-column spinal instability. In theory, augmentation of longitudinal constructs with TC after a thoracic PSO may provide additional rigidity, but the concept has not been previously evaluated.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the biomechanical contribution of TC to the rigidity of a long-segment pedicle screw-rod construct after a thoracic PSO.

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro fresh-frozen human cadaveric biomechanical analysis.

METHODS

Seven human cadaveric thoracic spines were prepared and instrumented from T4-T10 with bilateral pedicle screws/rods and a PSO was performed at T7. Intact range of motion (ROM) testing was performed with nondestructive loading and analyzed by loading modality (axial rotation [AR], flexion/extension [FE], and lateral bending [LB]). Range of motion analysis was performed in the unaugmented construct, the construct augmented with one TC, and the construct augmented with two TCs.

RESULTS

After PSO and an unaugmented longitudinal pedicle screw-rod construct, T4-T10 (overall construct) and T6-T8 (PSO site) ROMs were significantly reduced in all planes of motion compared with intact condition (AR: 11.8° vs. 31.7°; FE: 2.4° vs. 12.3°; 3.4° vs. 17.9°, respectively, p<.05). Augmentation of longitudinal construct with either one or two TCs did not significantly increase construct rigidity in FE or LB compared with the unaugmented construct (p>.05). In contrast, during AR, global ROM was significantly reduced by 43% and 48% at T6-T8 (1.7° and 1.2° vs. 2.38°, respectively) after addition of one and two TCs (p<.05), respectively. One TC did not significantly reduce torsional ROM from the intact state.

CONCLUSIONS

Two TCs significantly improved torsional rigidity of the entire construct and at the PSO site, with no differences in rigidity for FE and LB or with the addition of only one TC. In the setting of a PSO and long-segment pedicle screw-rod construct, augmentation with at least two TCs should be considered to improve torsional rigidity.

Impact of constrained dual-screw anchorage on holding strength and the resistance to cyclic loading in anterior spinal deformity surgery: a comparative biomechanical study

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical in vitro laboratory study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical performance of 3 fixation concepts used for anterior instrumented scoliosis correction and fusion (AISF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

AISF is an ideal estimate for selective fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Correction is mediated using rods and screws anchored in the vertebral bodies. Application of large correction forces can promote early weakening of the implant-vertebra interfaces, with potential postoperative loss of correction, implant dislodgment, and nonunion. Therefore, improvement of screw-rod anchorage characteristics with AISF is valuable.

METHODS

A total of 111 thoracolumbar vertebrae harvested from 7 human spines completed a testing protocol. Age of specimens was 62.9 ± 8.2 years. Vertebrae were potted in polymethylmethacrylate and instrumented using 3 different devices with identical screw length and unicortical fixation: single constrained screw fixation (SC fixation), nonconstrained dual-screw fixation (DNS fixation), and constrained dual-screw fixation (DC fixation) resembling a novel implant type. Mechanical testing of each implant-vertebra unit using cyclic loading and pullout tests were performed after stress tests were applied mimicking surgical maneuvers during AISF. Test order was as follows: (1) preload test 1 simulating screw-rod locking and cantilever forces; (2) preload test 2 simulating compression/distraction maneuver; (3) cyclic loading tests with implant-vertebra unit subjected to stepwise increased cyclic loading (maximum: 200 N) protocol with 1000 cycles at 2 Hz, tests were aborted if displacement greater than 2 mm occurred before reaching 1000 cycles; and (4) coaxial pullout tests at a pullout rate of 5 mm/min. With each test, the mode of failure, that is, shear versus fracture, was noted as well as the ultimate load to failure (N), number of implant-vertebra units surpassing 1000 cycles, and number of cycles and related loads applied.

RESULTS

Thirty-three percent of vertebrae surpassed 1000 cycles, 38% in the SC group, 19% in the DNS group, and 43% in the DC group. The difference between the DC group and the DNS group yielded significance (P = 0.04). For vertebrae not surpassing 1000 cycles, the number of cycles at implant displacement greater than 2 mm in the SC group was 648.7 ± 280.2 cycles, in the DNS group was 478.8 ± 219.0 cycles, and in the DC group was 699.5 ± 150.6 cycles. Differences between the SC group and the DNS group were significant (P = 0.008) as between the DC group and the DNS group (P = 0.0009). Load to failure in the SC group was 444.3 ± 302 N, in the DNS group was 527.7 ± 273 N, and in the DC group was 664.4 ± 371.5 N. The DC group outperformed the other constructs. The difference between the SC group and the DNS group failed significance (P = 0.25), whereas there was a significant difference between the SC group and the DC group (P = 0.003). The DC group showed a strong trend toward increased load to failure compared with the DNS group but without significance (P = 0.067). Surpassing 1000 cycles had a significant impact on the maximum load to failure in the SC group (P = 0.0001) and in the DNS group (P = 0.01) but not in the DC group (P = 0.2), which had the highest number of vertebrae surpassing 1000 cycles.

CONCLUSION

Constrained dual-screw fixation characteristics in modern AISF implants can improve resistance to cyclic loading and pullout forces. DC constructs bear the potential to reduce the mechanical shortcomings of AISF.

"Transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion" in the management of lower thoracic spine fracture dislocations: technical note

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control clinical study.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the usefulness and safety of a novel reconstructive procedure known as transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion (TTIF) in the treatment of lower thoracic spine fracture dislocations, and to compare its efficacy with posterior/anterior combined surgery (PACS).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

We developed a TTIF procedure for thoracic spine lesions, and obtained good clinical outcomes for degenerative disorders of the thoracic spine. However, the technique of TTIF in the lower thoracic spine fracture dislocation has never been reported.

METHODS

Seven consecutive patients with lower thoracic spine fracture dislocations underwent TTIF (6 males, 1 female; mean age, 32 y), and 16 consecutive patients with lower thoracic spine fracture dislocations underwent PACS (14 males, 2 females; mean age, 37 y). Surgical complications, clinical outcomes, and sagittal alignment were investigated. Bony fusion was assessed using plain and functional x-rays and computed tomography scans.

RESULTS

In the TTIF group and the PACS group, the mean operative times were 153 and 224 minutes, respectively, and the mean operative bleeding was 421 and 698 mL, respectively. All patients in the TTIF group were ambulatory within 2 days after surgery. Preoperative local sagittal alignments (kyphotic angles) were 22.9 and 22.5 degrees, respectively. Postoperative local sagittal alignments were 9.9 and 7.2 degrees, respectively. There were no instances of instrumentation failure or nonunion, and there were no serious complications such as neurological deficits in either group. In addition, a chest tube was necessary in 11 cases (69%) of PACS after thoracotomy, but was not required in any TTIF cases.

CONCLUSIONS

TTIF achieves posterior rigid fixation with instrumentation, and anterior column reconstruction by interbody fusion. This procedure also enables early postoperative ambulation without respiratory problems. TTIF can be a useful option for reconstructive surgery of the lower thoracic spine after fracture dislocations.

Compression and contact area of anterior strut grafts in spinal instrumentation: a biomechanical study

Background

Anterior bone grafts are used as struts to reconstruct the anterior column of the spine in kyphosis or following injury. An incomplete fusion can lead to later correction losses and compromise further healing. Despite the different stabilizing techniques that have evolved, from posterior or anterior fixating implants to combined anterior/posterior instrumentation, graft pseudarthrosis rates remain an important concern. Furthermore, the need for additional anterior implant fixation is still controversial. In this bench-top study, we focused on the graft-bone interface under various conditions, using two simulated spinal injury models and common surgical fixation techniques to investigate the effect of implant-mediated compression and contact on the anterior graft.

Methods

Calf spines were stabilised with posterior internal fixators. The wooden blocks as substitutes for strut grafts were impacted using a “pressfit” technique and pressure-sensitive films placed at the interface between the vertebral bone and the graft to record the compression force and the contact area with various stabilization techniques. Compression was achieved either with posterior internal fixator alone or with an additional anterior implant. The importance of concomitant ligament damage was also considered using two simulated injury models: pure compression Magerl/AO fracture type A or rotation/translation fracture type C models.

Results

In type A injury models, 1 mm-oversized grafts for impaction grafting provided good compression and fair contact areas that were both markedly increased by the use of additional compressing anterior rods or by shortening the posterior fixator construct. Anterior instrumentation by itself had similar effects. For type C injuries, dramatic differences were observed between the techniques, as there was a net decrease in compression and an inadequate contact on the graft occurred in this model. Under these circumstances, both compression and the contact area on graft could only be maintained at high levels with the use of additional anterior rods.

Conclusions

Under experimental conditions, we observed that ligamentous injury following type C fracture has a negative influence on the compression and contact area of anterior interbody bone grafts when only an internal fixator is used for stabilization. Because of the loss of tension banding effects in type C injuries, an additional anterior compressing implant can be beneficial to restore both compression to and contact on the strut graft.

FRACTURE-DISLOCATION OF THE THORACIC SPINE DURING SECOND TRIMESTER OF PREGNANCY: CASE REPORT AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Spinal fractures associated with spinal cord injury rarely affect pregnant patients. The authors present the case of a 20-year-old woman in her 20^th week of pregnancy, who suffered fracture-dislocation of the thoracic spine (T4-T5) and underwent decompression, reduction and posterior fusion with pedicle screws. Despite the complete spinal cord injury presented, the pregnancy progressed uneventfully and resulted in birth via normal delivery of a healthy newborn at term. Some particular features of this case, like the care needed in using ionizing radiation, the surgical approach and delivery, use of steroids and pregnancy complications in such patients are discussed here. Only a multidisciplinary team composed by physicians from different specialties (spinal surgeons, obstetricians and physiatrists), nurses and physiotherapists is capable of assisting pregnant patients with spinal cord injuries satisfactorily.

Implications of the center of rotation concept for the reconstruction of anterior column lordosis and axial preloads in spinal deformity surgery

OBJECT

In thoracolumbar deformity surgery, anterior-only approaches are used for reconstruction of anterior column failures. It is generally advised that vertebral body replacements (VBRs) should be preloaded by compression. However, little is known regarding the impact of different techniques for generation of preloads and which surgical principle is best for restoration of lordosis. Therefore, the authors analyzed the effect of different surgical techniques to restore spinal alignment and lordosis as well as the ability to generate axial preloads on VBRs in anterior column reconstructions.

METHODS

The authors performed a laboratory study using 7 fresh-frozen specimens (from T-3 to S-1) to assess the ability for lordosis reconstruction of 5 techniques and their potential for increasing preloads on a modified distractable VBR in a 1-level thoracolumbar corpectomy. The testing protocol was as follows: 1) Radiographs of specimens were obtained. 2) A 1-level corpectomy was performed. 3) In alternating order, lordosis was applied using 1 of the 5 techniques. Then, preloads during insertion and after relaxation using the modified distractable VBR were assessed using a miniature load-cell incorporated in the modified distractable VBR. The modified distractable VBR was inserted into the corpectomy defect after lordosis was applied using 1) a lamina spreader; 2) the modified distractable VBR only; 3) the ArcoFix System (an angular stable plate system enabling in situ reduction); 4) a lordosizer (a customized instrument enabling reduction while replicating the intervertebral center of rotation [COR] according to the COR method); and 5) a lordosizer and top-loading screws ([LZ+TLS], distraction with the lordosizer applied on a 5.5-mm rod linked to 2 top-loading pedicle screws inserted laterally into the vertebra). Changes in the regional kyphosis angle were assessed radiographically using the Cobb method.

RESULTS

The bone mineral density of specimens was 0.72 ± 22.6 g/cm(2). The maximum regional kyphosis angle reconstructed among the 5 techniques averaged 9.7°-16.1°, and maximum axial preloads averaged 123.7-179.7 N. Concerning correction, in decreasing order the LZ+TLS, lordosizer, and ArcoFix System outperformed the lamina spreader and modified distractable VBR. The order of median values for insertion peak load, from highest to lowest, were lordosizer, LZ+TLS, and ArcoFix, which outperformed the lamina spreader and modified distractable VBR. In decreasing order, the axial preload was highest with the lordosizer and LZ+TLS, which both outperformed the lamina spreader and the modified distractable VBR. The technique enabling the greatest lordosis achieved the highest preloads. With the ArcoFix System and LZ+TLS, compression loads could be applied and were 247.8 and 190.6 N, respectively, which is significantly higher than the insertion peak load and axial preload (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Including the ability for replication of the COR in instruments designed for anterior column reconstructions, the ability for lordosis restoration of the anterior column and axial preloads can increase, which in turn might foster fusion.

In vitro biomechanics of an expandable vertebral body replacement with self-adjusting end plates

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Unstable burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine may be treated surgically. Vertebral body replacements (VBRs) give anterior column support and, when used with supplemental fixation, impart rigidity to the injured segments. Although some VBRs are expandable, device congruity to the vertebral end plates is imprecise and may lead to stress risers and device subsidence.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to compare the rigidity of a VBR that self-adjusts to the adjacent vertebral end plates versus structural bone allograft and with an unsupported anterior column in a traumatic burst fracture reconstruction model.

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical flexibility testing with rod strain measurement.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twelve T11-L3 human spine segments.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Range of motion, neutral zone, and posterior fixation rod stress (moments).

METHODS

Flexibility testing was performed to ± 6 Nm in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation on 12 intact human T11-L3 specimens. Burst fractures were created in L1, and flexibility testing was repeated in three additional states: subtotal corpectomy with posterior instrumentation (PI) only from T12 to L2, reconstruction with a femoral strut allograft and PI, and reconstruction with a VBR (with self-adjusting end plates) and PI. The PI consisted of pedicle screws and strain gage instrumented rods that were calibrated to measure rod stress via flexion-extension bending moments.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in range of motion or neutral zone between the strut graft and VBR constructs, which both had less motion than the PI-only construct in flexion/extension and torsion and were both less than the intact values in flexion/extension and lateral bending (p < .05). Posterior rod moments were significantly greater for the PI-only construct in flexion/extension relative to the strut graft and VBR states (p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

This study, which simulated the immediate postoperative state, suggests that a VBR with self-adjusting end plate components has rigidity similar to the standard strut graft when combined with PI. Posterior rod stress was not significantly increased with this type of VBR compared with the strut graft reconstruction. The benefits of burst fracture stabilization using a self-adjusting VBR ultimately will not be known until long-term clinical studies are performed.

Operative treatment of 733 patients with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries: comprehensive results from the second, prospective, Internet-based multicenter study of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery

The second, internet-based multicenter study (MCSII) of the Spine Study Group of the German Association of Trauma Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie) is a representative patient collection of acute traumatic thoracolumbar (T1-L5) injuries. The MCSII results are an update of those obtained with the first multicenter study (MCSI) more than a decade ago. The aim of the study was to assess and bring into focus: the (1) epidemiologic data, (2) surgical and radiological outcome, and (3) 2-year follow-up (FU) results of these injuries. According to the Magerl/AO classification, there were 424 (57.8%) compression fractures (A type), 178 (24.3%) distractions injuries (B type), and 131 (17.9%) rotational injuries (C type). B and C type injuries carried a higher risk for neurological deficits, concomitant injuries, and multiple vertebral fractures. The level of injury was located at the thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) in 67.0% of the case. 380 (51.8%) patients were operated on by posterior stabilization and instrumentation alone (POSTERIOR), 34 (4.6%) had an anterior procedure (ANTERIOR), and 319 (43.5%) patients were treated with combined posteroanterior surgery (COMBINED). 65% of patients with thoracic (T1-T10) and 57% with lumbar spinal (L3-L5) injuries were treated with a single posterior approach (POSTERIOR). 47% of the patients with thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) injuries were either operated from posterior or with a combined posterior-anterior surgery (COMBINED) each. Short angular stable implant systems have replaced conventional non-angular stable instrumentation systems to a large extent. The posttraumatic deformity was restored best with COMBINED surgery. T-spine injuries were accompanied by a higher number and more severe neurologic deficits than TL junction or L-spine injuries. At the same time T-spine injuries showed less potential for neurologic recovery especially in paraplegic (Frankel/AISA A) patients. 5% of all patients required revision surgery for perioperative complications. Follow-up data of 558 (76.1%) patients were available and collected during a 30-month period from 1 January 2004 until 31 May 2006. On average, a posterior implant removal was carried out in a total of 382 COMBINED and POSTERIOR patients 12 months after the initial surgery. On average, the rehabilitation process required 3-4 weeks of inpatient treatment, followed by another 4 months of outpatient therapy and was significantly shorter when compared with MCSI in the mid-1990s. From the time of injury until FU, 80 (60.6%) of 132 patients with initial neurological deficits improved at least one grade on the Frankel/ASIA Scale; 8 (1.3%) patients deteriorated. A higher recovery rate was observed for incomplete neurological injuries (73%) than complete neurological injuries (44%). Different surgical approaches did not have a significant influence on the neurologic recovery until FU. Nevertheless, neurological deficits are the most important factors for the functional outcome and prognosis of TL spinal injuries. POSTERIOR patients had a better functional and subjective outcome at FU than COMBINED patients. However, the posttraumatic radiological deformity was best corrected in COMBINED patients and showed significantly less residual kyphotic deformity (biseg GDW -3.8° COMBINED vs. -6.1° POSTERIOR) at FU (p = 0.005). The sagittal spinal alignment was better maintained when using vertebral body replacement implants (cages) in comparison to iliac strut grafts. Additional anterior plate systems did not have a significant influence on the radiological FU results. In conclusion, comprehensive data of a large patient population with acute thoracolumbar spinal injuries has been obtained and analyzed with this prospective internet-based multicenter study. Thus, updated results and the clinical outcome of the current operative treatment strategies in participating German and Austrian trauma centers have been presented. Nevertheless, it was not possible to answer all remaining questions to contradictory findings of the subjective, clinical outcome and corresponding radiological findings between different surgical subgroups. Randomized-controlled long-term investigations seem mandatory and the next step in future clinical research of Spine Study Group of the German Trauma Society.

Transpedicular plate fixator as effective system of spine stabilisation: biomechanical characteristics

INTRODUCTION

Zespol fixator, which was created in Poland by Ramatowski and Granowski, has an angular stable connection of screws and plate. These properties of this plate fixator, that is effective and not an expensive system of osteosynthesis of shaft of long bone widely used in Poland, impelled us to adapt it as a transpedicular plate fixator of spine.

AIM

The aim of our in vitro study was to measure loads acting on spine stabilized by transpedicular plate fixator and to determine if its stability is comparable with uninjured spine. We also hypothesized that the spine stability with examined fixator had similar properties as spine fixators constructed with screws and rods.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We tested its biomechanical properties and compared it with a CD device by using specimens of four human spines. Each spine with damage induced in laboratory conditions was stabilised by one of those stabilisers in one (L4-L5) or two (Th12-L2) motion segments and subsequently were subject to load. The spines without and with one of transpedicular stabilization were subject to an unsymmetrical shift of +3/-4 mm for extension-compression and symmetrical shift for bending, in the frontal plane (+0.14/-0.14 rad) and the sagittal plane (+0.11/-0.11 rad), respectively.

RESULTS

Loads during extension-compression and bending in the sagittal plane were similar to the uninjured spine for short stabilization by using both stabilizers and amounted to 92.3 and 98.26%, respectively, of the load range sums of healthy spines. For long stabilization these loads amounted to 93.2 and 84.4%, respectively. Only following short and long stabilization for both devices in case of bending in the frontal plane the increase in loads up to 144.2 and 163.3% of the range sums of uninjured spines was achieved.

CONCLUSION

It corroborates the fact that the application of the modified Zespol device for spine stabilisation provides the possibility of restoring its load transfer capacity similar to that in the healthy spine and comparable with the CD device.

Biomechanical comparison of three fixation techniques for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Laboratory investigation

OBJECT

Increased structural stability is considered sufficient justification for higher-risk surgical procedures, such as circumferential fixation after severe spinal destabilization. However, there is little biomechanical evidence to support such claims, particularly after traumatic lumbar burst fracture. The authors sought out to compare the biomechanical performance of the following 3 fixation strategies for spinal reconstruction after decompression for an unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture: 1) short-segment anterolateral fixation; 2) circumferential fixation; and 3) extended anterolateral fixation.

METHODS

Thoracolumbar spines (T10-L4) from 7 donors (mean age at death 64+/-6 years; 1 female and 6 males) were tested in pure moment loading in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Thoracolumbar burst fractures were surgically induced at L-1, and testing was repeated sequentially for each of the following fixation techniques: short-segment anterolateral, circumferential, and extended anterolateral. Primary and coupled 3D motions were measured across the instrumented site (T12-L2) and compared across treatment groups.

RESULTS

Circumferential and extended anterolateral fixations were statistically equivalent for primary and off-axis range-of-motions in all loading directions, and short-segment anterolateral fixation offered significantly less rigidity than the other 2 methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study strongly suggest that extended anterolateral fixation is biomechanically comparable to circumferential fusion in the treatment of unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior column and posterior ligamentous injury. In cases in which an anterior procedure may be favored for load sharing or canal decompression, extension of the anterior instrumentation and fusion one level above and below the unstable segment can result in near equivalent stability to a 2-stage circumferential procedure.

Biomechanical testing of a novel four-rod technique for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction

STUDY DESIGN

A biomechanical testing protocol was used to study different lumbo-pelvic fixation techniques in a human cadaveric lumbar spine model.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the in vitro biomechanics of a novel four-rod lumbo-pelvic reconstruction technique with and with out cross-links, to that of a conventional cross-linked two-rod technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Numerous lumbo-pelvic reconstruction methods based on the Galveston two-rod technique have been proposed for cases involving total sacrectomy. Recently a technique that proposes novel use of 4 supporting longitudinal rods across the lumbo-pelvic junction has been reported. No comparative in vitro biomechanical testing has been previously done to evaluate these different reconstruction methods.

METHODS

Five spines were evaluated in flexion, extension, left-right lateral bending and left-right axial rotation in a human total sacrectomy model. The model was comprised of cadaveric lumbar spines (L1-L5) with custom fabricated polyethylene blocks used to simulate pelvic fixation. Three conditions were evaluated: Linked Four-Rod, Linked Two-Rod, and Four-Rod (no cross-links). Flexibility and motion data were compared using a one-way repeated measures analysis of variance and SNK tests.

RESULTS

The Linked Four-Rod and Four-Rod conditions significantly decreased flexibility and reduced L5-Pelvic motion over the Linked Two-Rod construct in flexion and extension. The Linked Four-Rod condition significantly decreased flexibility in left-right axial rotation compared with the Four-Rod and Linked Two-Rod conditions. No significant differences occurred in relative lateral movement between left and right pelvic polyethylene blocks.

CONCLUSION

The four-rod technique improved fixation stability over the conventional linked two-rod technique in flexion and extension, and when cross-linked, in left-right axial rotation. The four-rod technique also significantly reduced L5-Pelvic junction movement in flexionand extension, which may have implications for bony fusion. The use of cross-links is recommended.

Augmentation of an anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior plate or pedicle screw fixation: a comparative biomechanical in vitro study

OBJECT

Posterior pedicle screw (PS) instrumentation is often used to augment anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) but at the cost of an increase in the morbidity rate due to the second approach and screw placement. If anterior plates were found to be biomechanically equivalent to PS fixation (PSF) after ALIF, then this second approach could be avoided without decreasing vertebral stability.

METHODS

Eight cadaveric L5-S1 spinal segments were tested under four conditions: intact, following anterior discectomy and interbody spacer placement, after placement of an anterior plate, and following PSF. The elastic zone and stiffness were calculated for axial compression, flexion/extension, lateral bending, and torsion. Neither anterior plate stabilization nor PSF showed significant intergroup differences in stiffness or the elastic zone. Both exhibited greater stiffness in flexion than the intact specimens (p < 0.001). Pedicle screw fixation was associated with a decreased elastic zone in lateral bending compared with the intact specimen (p < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior plate fixation is biomechanically similar to PSF following ALIF. Surgeons may wish to use anterior plates in place of PSs to avoid the need for a posterior procedure. This may lead to a decrease in operative morbidity and improved overall outcomes.

Pullout strength of anterior spinal instrumentation: a product comparison of seven screws in calf vertebral bodies

A lot of new implant devices for spine surgery are coming onto the market, in which vertebral screws play a fundamental role. The new screws developed for surgery of spine deformities have to be compared to established systems. A biomechanical in vitro study was designed to assess the bone-screw interface fixation strength of seven different screws used for correction of scoliosis in spine surgery. The objectives of the current study were twofold: (1) to evaluate the initial strength at the bone-screw interface of newly developed vertebral screws (Universal Spine System II) compared to established systems (product comparison) and (2) to evaluate the influence of screw design, screw diameter, screw length and bone mineral density on pullout strength. Fifty-six calf vertebral bodies were instrumented with seven different screws (USS II anterior 8.0 mm, USS II posterior 6.2 mm, KASS 6.25 mm, USS II anterior 6.2 mm, USS II posterior 5.2 mm, USS 6.0 mm, USS 5.0 mm). Bone mineral density (BMD) was determined by quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Failure in axial pullout was tested using a displacement-controlled universal test machine. USS II anterior 8.0 mm showed higher pullout strength than all other screws. The difference constituted a tendency (P = 0.108) when compared to USS II posterior 6.2 mm (+19%) and was significant in comparison to the other screws (+30 to +55%, P < 0.002). USS II posterior 6.2 mm showed significantly higher pullout strength than USS 5.0 mm (+30%, P = 0.014). The other screws did not differ significantly in pullout strength. Pullout strength correlated significantly with BMD (P = 0.0015) and vertebral body width/screw length (P < 0.001). The newly developed screws for spine surgery (USS II) show higher pullout strength when compared to established systems. Screw design had no significant influence on pullout force in vertebral body screws, but outer diameter of the screw, screw length and BMD are good predictors of pullout resistance.

Two column lesions in the thoracolumbar junction: anterior, posterior or combined approach? A comparative biomechanical in vitro investigation

There are various surgical techniques for the treatment of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar region. Several implants have been developed for anterior or posterior instrumentation. Optimal treatment of unstable thoracolumbar osseous and ligamentous injuries remains controversial. To compare the stabilizing effects of an antero-lateral, thoracoscopically implantable plate system (macsTL, Aesculap, Germany) with the stability provided by a fixateur interne (SOCON, Aesculap, Germany), this in vitro investigation examined six human bisegmental (T12-L2) spinal units. Specimens were tested intact, and with simulation of osseous lesions in the anterior and ligamentous lesions in the posterior column (combined A/B-fracture). While loaded in the main anatomical planes such as flexion/extension, left and right lateral bending and left and right axial rotation with a bending moment of 7.5 Nm in a special testing jigs, motion analysis was performed. Quantitative interpretation of the stabilizing effect was achieved using a contactless three-dimensional motion analysis system. Each specimen was tested in four different scenarios: the first step measured movements of intact spinal segments. For the second step, specimens underwent simulation of combined A/B-fracture provided with bisegmental (T12/L2) antero-lateral fixation and bone strut graft from the iliac crest. For the third step, segments were additionally stabilized by the fixateur interne. The last measurement (fourth step) was performed after removing the anterior instrumentation. Range of motion (ROM) values were compared and statistically evaluated. Compared to the intact specimens the anterior instrumentation of the combined lesion, simulated A/B-fracture, leads to a stabilizing effect in flexion/extension and lateral bending. In contrast to these findings the torsional instability increased for the upper segment and bisegmentally. A maximum rigidity, beyond intact values, was registered for each anatomical plane with the combined instrumentation: antero-lateral and fixateur interne. After removing the anterior screw plate system maximum movements, in all segments for flexion/extension and lateral bending, bisegmentally and for the upper segment in axial rotation, were less than ROM values measured with the anterior system only. With respect to these findings a combined ventro-dorsal stabilization procedure should be considered for ligamentous disruptions of the posterior column in combination with A-fractures in the thoracolumbar junction.

Anterior stabilization of three-column thoracolumbar spinal trauma

Object

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results obtained in patients who underwent anterior stabilization for three-column thoracolumbar fractures.

Methods

The authors retrospectively reviewed available clinical and radiographic data (1997–2006) to classify three-column thoracolumbar fractures according to the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO) system, neurological status, spinal canal compromise, pre- and postoperative segmental angulation, and arthrodesis rate.

The mean computed tomography–measured preoperative spinal canal compromise was 48.3% (range 8–92%), and the mean vertebral body height loss was 39.4%. The mean preoperative kyphotic deformity of 14.9° improved to 4.6° at the final follow-up examination. Although this angulation had increased a mean of 1.8° during the follow-up period, the extent of correction was still significant compared with the preoperative angulation (p < 0.01). There were no cases of vascular complication or neurological deterioration.

Conclusions

Contemporary anterior spinal reconstruction techniques can allow certain types of unstable three-column thoracolumbar fractures to be treated via an anterior approach alone. Compared with traditional posterior approaches, the anterior route spares lumbar motion segments and obviates the need for harvesting of the iliac crest.

Bone mineral density of the thoracolumbar spine in relation to burst fractures: a quantitative computed tomography study

The most common pattern among thoracolumbar burst fractures involves failure of the superior vertebra end-plate. There have been many biomechanical studies of thoracolumbar burst fractures, but the biomechanics related to the internal architecture of thoracolumbar vertebrae has been rarely documented. The objective of this study was to test the hypotheses that distribution of the bone mineral density (BMD) of the thoracolumbar spine is related to the stress concentration in this region and therefore, supports the pattern of burst fractures that occur most commonly. We measured spinal BMD of the first lumbar vertebra in 22 individuals using quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in three levels. At each level, the BMD for the trabecular compartment was determined from each of six sites and from one site within each pedicle. Thus the trabecular density was measured at a total of 20 sites for each person. The highest average QCT BMD was in the pedicle (sites 13 and 14), whereas the BMD was abruptly decreased at the posterior part of the vertebral body near the pedicles. The results of the study indicate that stress concentration of the spine related to the regional variation in vertebral bone density may be implicated in the biomechanical mechanism underlying thoracolumbar burst fractures. This finding may be correlated with the injury mechanism of thoracolumbar burst fractures and of clinical significance.

Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

Operative management of a thoracolumbar burst fracture varies according to many factors. Fracture morphology, neurologic status, and surgeon preference play major roles in deciding upon anterior, posterior, or combined approaches. Optimizing neural decompression while providing stable internal fixation over the least number of spinal segments is the goal. Short-segment constructs via a single-stage approach (anterior versus posterior) have become viable options with advances in instrumentation and techniques. This study compares anterior-only fixation utilizing a corpectomy strut graft and a modern thoracolumbar plating system with a posterior-only construct using pedicle screws and load sharing hooks for the treatment of unstable burst fractures. Functional outcome and sagittal plane restoration and maintenance of sagittal plane alignment were evaluated. Fifty-three patients with unstable burst fractures were assessed with 40 undergoing an anterior-only construct and 13 having a short-segment posterior-only construct. The posterior-only group had no hardware failures; however, the loss of sagittal plane correction averaged 8.1 degrees, whereas the anterior-only group averaged only a 1.8-degree increase in sagittal plane kyphosis. Both techniques resulted in statistically significant initial improvement in sagittal alignment; however, the posterior short-segment group lost this statistical significance at follow-up whereas the anterior-only group continued to demonstrate statistically significant improvement in sagittal alignment at follow-up compared to preoperative measurements.

Biomechanical evaluation of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device

BACKGROUND

Recent innovations in dynamic devices have promised a reduction in stress shielding, protection of adjacent segment degeneration, and decreased implant failure. However, there have been few studies comparing the biomechanical properties of a rigid device in comparison to a dynamic posterior fixation device. The purpose of this study was to compare the immediate stability of a new dynamic pedicle screw fixation device with an equivalent rigid device.

METHODS

Six thoracolumbar cadaver spines (T10-L4) were fixed in a biomechanical testing frame. Pure moments of 10Nm were loaded in six directions: flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. For each spine, four different stages were tested: intact, destabilization of the middle segment, fixation with the dynamic device, and fixation with the rigid device. Ranges of motion were measured using stereophotogrammetry. The specimens with each device were then subjected to flexion-compression loading for five cycles on a MTS 858 Universal Testing Machine. The average stiffness of the last three cycles was recorded.

FINDINGS

Both dynamic and rigid devices were found to provide stability for the injured segment in flexion-extension and lateral bending. In axial rotation, the devices could restore the stability to levels similar to those in an intact spine. Results also indicated a slight increase in range of motion in flexion-extension and significant reduction in stiffness of flexion-compression with the dynamic device (P < 0.01), in comparison to the rigid device.

INTERPRETATION

The dynamic device offers a system that may alter favorably the movement and load transmission of a spinal motion segment without sacrificing construct stability.

Biomechanical evaluation of a novel lumbosacral axial fixation device

BACKGROUND

Interbody arthrodesis is employed in the lumbar spine to eliminate painful motion and achieve stability through bony fusion. Bone grafts, metal cages, composite spacers, and growth factors are available and can be placed through traditional open techniques or minimally invasively. Whether placed anteriorly, posteriorly, or laterally, insertion of these implants necessitates compromise of the anulus--an inherently destabilizing procedure. A new axial percutaneous approach to the lumbosacral spine has been described. Using this technique, vertical access to the lumbosacral spine is achieved percutaneously via the presacral space. An implant that can be placed across a motion segment without compromise to the anulus avoids surgical destabilization and may be advantageous for interbody arthrodesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the in vitro biomechanical performance of the axial fixation rod, an anulus sparing, centrally placed interbody fusion implant for motion segment stabilization.

METHOD OF APPROACH

Twenty-four bovine lumbar motion segments were mechanically tested using an unconstrainedflexibility protocol in sagittal and lateral bending, and torsion. Motion segments were also tested in axial compression. Each specimen was tested in an intact state, then drilled (simulating a transaxial approach to the lumbosacral spine), then with one of two axial fixation rods placed in the spine for stabilization. The range of motion, bending stiffness, and axial compressive stiffness were determined for each test condition. Results were compared to those previously reported for femoral ring allografts, bone dowels, BAK and BAK Proximity cages, Ray TFC, Brantigan ALIF and TLIF implants, the InFix Device, Danek TIBFD, single and double Harms cages, and Kaneda, Isola, and University plating systems.

RESULTS

While axial drilling of specimens had little effect on stiffness and range of motion, specimens implanted with the axial fixation rod exhibited significant increases in stiffness and decreases in range of motion relative to intact state. When compared to existing anterior, posterior, and interbody instrumentation, lateral and sagittal bending stiffness of the axial fixation rod exceeded that of all other interbody devices, while stiffness in extension and axial compression were comparable to plate and rod constructs. Torsional stiffness was comparable to other interbody constructs and slightly lower than plate and rod constructs.

CONCLUSIONS

For stabilization of the L5-S1 motion segment, axial placement of implants offers potential benefits relative to traditional exposures. The preliminary biomechanical data from this study indicate that the axial fixation rod compares favorably to other devices and may be suitable to reduce pathologic motion at L5-S1, thus promoting bony fusion.

Comparison of two interbody fusion cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model

Although the Brantigan cage and Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cage have different geometrical characteristics, clinical observations suggest that they are equally effective in restoring disc height and stability across the involved spinal segments. This study was designed to compare their performance as posterior lumbar interbody fusion devices at two levels in fresh ligamentous cadaver lumbar spines (L2-S1). After mounting in a testing frame, the three-dimensional load-displacement behaviour of each vertebra was quantified using the Selspot II Motion Measurement System for; the intact state, posterior decompression, and stabilisation, using a pair of Brantigan or BAK cages across L4-S1, additional stabilisation using Isola spinal instrumentation across L4-S1, and cyclic loading in flexion/extension. In the "cage-only" state, the Brantigan cage did not restore the stability in right axial rotation, whereas the BAK cage not only restored stability in all six directions but also improved lateral bending. After implanting the posterior instrumentation, both groups exhibited similar stability, and cyclic loading did not alter this. Although the Brantigan cage appears less effective than the BAK cage, implantation of posterior instrumentation significantly improves stability and reduces the differences between them. This underscores the need to use posterior instrumentation to achieve a higher initial stability.

Range of motion in reconstruction situations following corpectomy in the lumbar spine: a question of bone mineral density?

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical study to evaluate the stability of different types of instrumentation in the lumbar spine following corpectomy in relation to bone mineral density (BMD).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the relation between the stability of a spinal instrumentation and BMD. To determine a threshold value of BMD allowing a single ventral instrumentation following corpectomy in the lumbar spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Some in vitro studies determined the biomechanical properties of different spinal instrumentations in various spinal injury models. To the authors' knowledge, there are no published data available concerning stabilization in relation to BMD. A guideline for the treatment of a corpectomy depending on BMD would be helpful in order to choose the appropriate surgical method.

METHODS

Twenty-four fresh frozen human lumbar cadaveric spine specimens L1-L3 were used for testing of biomechanical properties. Plain radiographs were taken. BMD was determined using quantitative computed tomography (QCT). Testing in a 6 df loading device included native specimens and specimens after corpectomy of L2, restoration of the defect with a titanium cage, and two reconstruction situations: single ventral and additional dorsal instrumentation. Load-displacement curves and range of motion parameters were recorded and correlated with BMD.

RESULTS

A significant (P < 0.05) influence of BMD on range of motion was found. Single ventral instrumentation was critical concerning axial rotation. Combined dorsoventral instrumentation offered sufficient stability. The threshold value for use of single ventral instrumentation is a BMD > or = 0.22 g/cm.

CONCLUSIONS

Single ventral instrumentation can provide sufficient stability following corpectomy in the lumbar spine under the condition of a high BMD. Determination of BMD and the use of this guideline provides a valid tool for surgical planning.

Is a single anterolateral screw-plate fixation sufficient for the treatment of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction? A biomechanical in vitro investigation

Controversy exists about the indications, advantages and disadvantages of various surgical techniques used for anterior interbody fusion of spinal fractures in the thoracolumbar junction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the stabilizing effect of an anterolateral and thoracoscopically implantable screw-plate system. Six human bisegmental spinal units (T12-L2) were used for the biomechanical in vitro testing procedure. Each specimen was tested in three different scenarios: (1) intact spinal segments vs (2) monosegmental (T12/L1) anterolateral fixation (macsTL, Aesculap, Germany) with an interbody bone strut graft from the iliac crest after both partial corpectomy (L1) and discectomy (T12/L1) vs (3) bisegmental anterolateral instrumentation after extended partial corpectomy (L1), and bisegmental discectomy (T12/L1 and L1/L2). Specimens were loaded with an alternating, nondestructive maximum bending moment of +/-7.5 Nm in six directions: flexion/extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Motion analysis was performed by a contact-less three-dimensional optical measuring system. Segmental stiffness of the three different scenarios was evaluated by the relative alteration of the intervertebral angles in the three main anatomical planes. With each stabilization technique, the specimens were more rigid, compared with the intact spine, for flexion/extension (sagittal plane) as well as in left and right lateral bending (frontal plane). In these planes the bisegmental instrumentation compared to the monosegmental case had an even larger stiffening effect on the specimens. In contrast to these findings, axial rotation showed a modest increase of motion after bisegmental instrumentation. To conclude, the immobilization of monosegmental fractures in the thoracolumbar junction can be secured by means of bone grafting and the implant used in this study for all three anatomical planes. After bisegmental anterolateral stabilization a sufficient reduction of the movements was registered for flexion/extension and lateral bending. However, the observed slight increase of the range of motion in the transversal plane may lead to loosening of the implant before union. Therefore, the use of an additional dorsal fixation device should be considered.

Biomechanical in vitro comparison of different mono- and bisegmental anterior procedures with regard to the strategy for fracture stabilisation using minimally invasive techniques

Endoscopic minimally invasive techniques have become an established method of fracture stabilisation in the spine. In view of this fact, anterior stabilisation strategies must be reconsidered, as monosegmental A 3.1 compression fractures are increasingly being stabilised endoscopically from the anterior aspect using minimally invasive techniques. This study investigated the biomechanical necessity of anterior two-point or four-point stabilisation in the instrumentation of mono- and bisegmental fractures. In three biomechanical in vitro studies, burst fracture stabilisation was simulated, and anterior short fixation devices were tested under load with pure moments up to 3.75 Nm to evaluate the biomechanical stabilising characteristics of different kinds of instrumentations in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. Only anterior four-point stabilisation resulted in sufficient primary stability both in mono- and bisegmental instrumentation and therefore represents the standard procedure in open as well as in minimally invasive spinal surgery.

Anterior-Only Stabilization of Three-Column Thoracolumbar Injuries

OBJECTIVE

The optimal treatment of "unstable" thoracolumbar injuries remains controversial. Studies have shown the advantages of direct anterior decompression of thoracolumbar injuries along with supplemental posterior instrumentation as a combined or staged procedure. Others have also shown success in decompression as a single-stage anterior procedure, largely limited to two-column (anterior and middle) injuries. A retrospective review of all available clinical and radiographic data was used to classify unstable three-column thoracolumbar fractures according to the Association for the Study of Internal Fixation (AO) classification system. This was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of stand-alone anterior decompression and reconstruction of unstable three-column thoracolumbar injuries, utilizing current-generation anterior spinal instrumentation.

METHODS

Between 1992 and 1998, 40 patients underwent anterior decompression and two-segment anteriorly instrumented reconstruction for three-column thoracolumbar fractures. Retrospective review of all available clinical and radiographic data was used to classify these unstable injuries according to the AO classification system, evaluating for neurologic changes, spinal canal compromise, preoperative and postoperative segmental angulation, and arthrodesis rate.

RESULTS

According to the AO classification system, there were 24 (60%) type B1.2, 10 (25%) type B2.3, 5 (12.5%) type C1.3, and 1 (2.5%) type C2.1 three-column injuries. Preoperative canal compromise averaged 68.5% and vertebral height loss averaged 44.5%. There were no cases of neurologic deterioration, and 30 (91%) patients with incomplete neurologic deficits improved by at least one modified Frankel grade. Mean preoperative segmental kyphosis of 22.7 degrees was improved to an early mean of 7.4 degrees (P < 0.0001). At latest follow-up, angulation had increased by an average 2.1 degrees but maintained significant improvement from preoperative measurements (P < 0.0001). There was one early construct failure due to technical error. Thirty-seven of the remaining patients (95%) went on to apparently stable arthrodesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Current types of anterior spinal instrumentation and reconstruction techniques can allow some types of unstable three-column thoracolumbar injuries to be treated in an anterior stand-alone fashion. This allows direct anterior decompression of neural elements, improvement in segmental angulation, and acceptable rates of arthrodesis without the need for supplemental posterior instrumentation.

Posterior instrumentation reduces differences in spine stability as a result of different cage orientations: an in vitro study

STUDY DESIGN

A multisegmental cadaveric spine model was used to quantify the load-displacement behavior of intact spine specimens, specimens injured and stabilized using Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cages as lumbar interbody fusion devices with or without posterior instrumentation across two levels.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the stabilities imparted by the cages placed using an oblique and conventional posterior approaches and to determine the effects of supplementary posterior instrumentation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The BAK cage as posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) has been used to restore disc height, reduce morbidity, provide immediate stability to the patients, and enhance fusion rates. The obliquely inserted BAK cage has the advantages of reducing exposure and precise implantation. The biomechanical efficacy of this procedure is sparse, especially in comparison to the PLIF with and without posterior instrumentation.

METHODS

Nine fresh human ligamentous spines (L2-S1) were affixed within a testing frame for determining their load-displacement behaviors. Load testing in clinically relevant modes was performed sequentially for the intact and the following procedures across the L4-S1 segment: posterior destabilization, stabilization using two parallel BAK cages (CBAK group) or one oblique BAK cage (OBAK group), further stabilization with posterior instrumentation, and finally cyclic loading in flexion-extension. Spatial positions of the LEDs attached to vertebral bodies were recorded using a three-dimensional motion measurement system.

RESULTS

When used alone to restore stability, the orientation of the cage affected the outcome. In flexion OBAK orientation and in extension CBAK orientation provided better stability (decrease in motion with respect to intact case), compared with the other orientation. In lateral bending, CBAK orientation was found to be better than OBAK. In axial mode, CBAK orientation was effective in both directions while OBAK was effective only in right axial rotation. With the supplementary posterior fixation, the differences in stability resulting from the orientations were not noticeable at all, both before and after cyclic tests.

CONCLUSIONS

Owing to the differences in the surgical approach and the amount of dissection, the stability for the cages when used alone as a function of cage orientation was different. These subtle differences were reduced by the use of posterior fixation device, underscoring the importance of using instrumentation when cages are used as PLIFs. However, the oblique insertion may be more favorable since it requires less exposure, enables precise implantation, and is less expensive, especially when used with supplementary instrumentation.

Biomechanical testing of anterior and posterior thoracolumbar instrumentation in the cadaveric spine

Object. Thoracolumbar burst fractures frequently require surgical intervention. Although the use of either anterior or posterior instrumentation has advantages and disadvantages, there have been few studies in which these two approaches have been compared biomechanically.

Methods. Ten human cadaveric spines were subjected to subtotal L-3 corpectomy. In five spines placement of L-3 wooden strut grafts with lateral L2–4 dual rod and screw instrumentation was performed. Five other spines underwent L1–5 pedicle screw fixation. The spines were fatigued between steps of the experiment. The spines were load tested with pure moments of 1.5, 3, 4.5, and 6 Nm in the intact state and after placement of instrumentation in six degrees of freedom (flexion, extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation).

In axial rotation posterior instrumentation significantly increased spinal rigidity compared with that of the intact state, whereas anterior instrumentation did not. Combined anterior—posterior instrumentation did not significantly increase the rigidity of the spine when compared with anterior or posterior instrumentation alone. Posterior instrumentation alone provided a greater reduction in angular rotation compared with anterior instrumentation alone in all degrees of freedom; however, statistical significance was achieved only in extension at 6 Nm.

Conclusions. The increased rigidity provided by pedicle screw instrumentation compared with the intact state or with anterior instrumentation is due to the longer construct spanning five levels and the three-column engagement of the pedicle screws. The decision to use anterior or posterior instrumentation should be based on the clinical necessity of canal decompression and correction of angulation.

Thoracoscopic Placement of Dual-Rod Instrumentation in Thoracic Spinal Trauma

OBJECTIVE AND IMPORTANCE

Traditionally, thoracic fractures that require anterior stabilization are treated through an open thoracotomy approach. Thoracoscopic instrumentation avoids many of the complications associated with an open thoracotomy but is technically challenging. We report the first cases of dual-rod internal fixation systems placed thoracoscopically for thoracic spinal trauma.

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Two male patients sustained midthoracic spinal trauma falling from motorcycles in separate incidents. Both injuries led to unstable spinal columns, but the patients had no neurological deficits and had minimal spinal cord compression. One patient had a complex spiral fracture from T6 to T8; the other had T7 burst and T8 compression fractures. Based on the complex morphological features of the patients' fractures, anterior internal fixation was the treatment of choice for both. The two available options for an anterior stabilization were open thoracotomy and thoracoscopic instrumentation. Because extensive decompression was unnecessary, a thoracoscopic approach was used.

INTERVENTION

A dual-rod internal fixation system (Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc., Memphis, TN) was placed with two screws each in the T6 and T9 vertebral bodies of each patient. Thoracoscopy was used for direct visualization of the operative site with fluoroscopic guidance for screw placement. Surgery was completed without complications, and both patients did well afterward. Upright and supine x-rays demonstrated that the constructs were stable at 10 weeks and 6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Thoracoscopic instrumentation offers the advantages of a minimally invasive approach but is technically challenging. The characteristics of dual-rod fixation systems (small-profile components and step-wise insertion) provide the best biomechanical profile and facilitate thoracoscopic instrumentation.

Thoracolumbar fracture stabilization: comparative biomechanical evaluation of a new video-assisted implantable system

Minimally invasive techniques for spinal surgery are becoming more widespread as improved technologies are developed. Stabilization plays an important role in fracture treatment, but appropriate instrumentation systems for endoscopic circumstances are lacking. Therefore a new thoracoscopically implantable stabilization system for thoracolumbar fracture treatment was developed and its biomechanical in vitro properties were compared. In a biomechanical in vitro study, burst fracture stabilization was simulated and anterior short fixation devices were tested under load with pure moments to evaluate the biomechanical stabilizing characteristics of the new system in comparison with a currently available system. With interbody graft and fixation the new system demonstrated higher stabilizing effects in flexion/extension and lateral bending and restored axial stability beyond the intact spine, as well as having comparable or improved effects compared with the current system. Because of this biomechanical characterization a clinical trial is warranted; the usefulness of the new system has already been demonstrated in 45 patients in our department and more than 300 cases in a multicenter study which is currently under way.

Biomechanical evaluation of contemporary posterior spinal internal fixation configurations in an unstable burst-fracture calf spine model: special references of hook configurations and pedicle screws

STUDY DESIGN

This study attempts to determine the most biomechanically rigid posterior spinal instrumentation configuration in a burst-fracture calf spine model.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the biomechanical stability of contemporary posterior spinal instrumentation in various hook and screw configurations in an unstable calf spine model.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Burst-fractures are relatively common injuries seen in the setting of spinal trauma. The use of posterior-only configurations in the treatment of this deformity has become a much more popular approach because of the relative ease of applying the instrumentation.

METHODS

Fresh frozen in vitro study using 10 calf spines involving the T11-S1 vertebral segments. Pure moment forces including flexion, extension, axial rotation, and lateral bending were applied to the top of the spinal column at T11. Testing was first performed on all intact specimens. A corpectomy was then performed at L2. Testing was then repeated on each of the ten specimens after internal fixation with different posterior spinal configurations using ISOLA instrumentation (DePuy AcroMed Inc., Raynham, MA).

RESULTS

With regards to flexion-extension and lateral bending, all configurations except for distraction hook-rod construct provided stability greater than the intact spine. The distraction hook-rod configuration failed to control extension (P > 0.05) above the intact specimen. All pedicle screw constructs were more rigid than the hook-rod constructs in axial rotation at the level of injury (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The motion segment at the corpectomy site is adequately stabilized by contemporary spinal internal fixation configurations tested except for the distraction-hook stabilization. Axial rotation is generally poorly controlled by posterior-only internal fixation. Pedicle screw instrumentation was the most rigid compared with other forms of stabilization in stabilizing a burst-corpectomy defect. Based on this study, pedicle screw configurations are preferred over hook-rod strategies in the posterior stabilization of a burst-corpectomy anterior defect. Among hook-rod configurations, the distraction hook-rod strategy provided the least stability.

Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study using a thoracolumbar corpectomy model to compare load sharing capabilities and stiffnesses of six different anterior instrumentation systems (three rod styles and three plate styles) for stabilizing the thoracic and lumbar spine.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the axial load sharing capabilities of the instrumentation in a thoracolumbar corpectomy model and to measure the bending stiffness of the anterior instrumentation systems for the axes of flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation with and without an anterior column graft in place.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Prior publications have analyzed biomechanical characteristics of many spinal instrumentation systems. These reports have compared anterior instrumentation systems with posterior instrumentation systems, in situ fusion techniques, intervertebral spacers, structural allograft and instrumentation, and combined anterior and posterior instrumentation. Other reports have published data on the biomechanical characteristics of typical anterior and posterior spinal instrumentation systems. However, there are no published reports that specifically compare the characteristics of anterior plate-style with anterior rod-style systems, or examining load sharing capabilities.

METHODS

Six constructs of each of six instrumentation systems were mounted on simulated vertebral bodies. A custom four-axis spine simulator was used to apply independent flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation moments as well as axial compressive loads. Axial load sharing was measured through a range of applied axial loads from 50 N to 500 N with rotational moments maintained at 0 Nm. The bending stiffness of each construct was calculated in response to +/-5.0 Nm moments about each axis of rotation with a 50 N compressive axial load with a full-length corpectomy graft in place, simulating reconstruction of the anterior column, and with no graft in place, simulating catastrophic graft failure. Statistical significance was determined using an analysis of variance and Fisher PLSD post hoc test with an alpha <or= 0.05.

RESULTS

Load sharing results ranged from 63% to 89%. There was an inverse relationship between load sharing and stiffness. No correlation was found between load sharing and implant style (rod vs. plate). With the graft in place, stiffness result varied by instrumentation system rather than by plate/rod style. Without the graft, the stiffness of the constructs decreased approximately one-third in flexion-extension, two-thirds in lateral bending, and one-fifth in axial rotation, underlying the importance of the graft in overall construct stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

For both load sharing and stiffness, there is more influence from the design of the instrumentation system, than whether it is a plate or rod style system. The graft contributed to overall construct stiffness, particularly in lateral bending.

Posterior thoracic extrapedicular fixation: a biomechanical study

STUDY DESIGN

In vitro biomechanical testing of thoracic spine specimens using a standardized three-dimensional spine flexibility protocol.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the mechanical stability of the intrapedicular and extrapedicular technique for pedicle screw placement. The hypothesis was that extrapedicular screw placement provides an equally rigid construct.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screws provide rigid fixation of instabilities in the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Anatomic considerations and the potential risk of neurologic complications are the main reasons to hesitate using pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Extrapedicular fixation would allow safer insertion due to an increased distance to the spinal canal.

METHODS

Twelve human cadaveric thoracic spines (six intra-, six extrapedicular) were instrumented with the USS system, using computed tomography-based computer navigation to ensure accurate placement. The specimens were tested in flexion-extension, torsion, and lateral bending. The ROM was measured using an optoelectronic system, and the two methods were compared before and after implantation of the USS construct and before and after fatigue testing of the construct.

RESULTS

The ROM of the instrumented spine was reduced to less than 50% that of its original ROM. There were no statistically significant differences in the ROM reduction between the intra- and the extrapedicular technique. Cyclic fatiguing of the construct did not significantly increase the ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

The extrapedicular technique provides a construct for stabilization of the thoracic spine that is as rigid as the conventional intrapedicular technique, but has the advantage of a safer surgical screw insertion.

Axial compression force measurement acting across the strut graft in thoracolumbar instrumentation testing

OBJECTIVE

Current recommendations for spinal implant testing do not consider the determination of axial compression forces of the overbridging implant on the strut graft. No direct data exist on the influence of load transfer through the strut graft and of the kind of instrumentation, especially in thoracolumbar corpectomy models.

DESIGN

Therefore in this biomechanical in vitro study a method for measurement of the axial compression force acting across the strut graft in different thoracolumbar instrumentations was developed.

METHODS

In this in vitro study, a corpectomy model was simulated and anterior, posterior and combined short fixation devices currently available were tested under pure moments to evaluate their biomechanical stabilizing characteristics. Range of motion, neutral zone and the axial compressive force acting on the strut graft were measured continuously in the three primary directions.

RESULTS

Without loads, the combined stabilization and followed by anterior instrumentation created a higher axial compression force than the dorsal instrumentation on the strut graft. Especially during maximal extension there was no axial compression of the dorsal instrumentation on the strut graft, which resulted in an increase of the range of motion.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of the new method was demonstrated in this study. For the purpose of standardization and comparison it should be considered in spinal implant testing.

Enhanced primary stability through additional cementable cannulated rescue screw for anterior thoracolumbar plate application

OBJECT

The authors conducted a study to investigate the biomechanical in vitro influence of a new anchorage system for fixation of anterior stabilization devices and the possibility of using additional cement after screw insertion to compensate for poor bone quality. The incidence of osteoporosis-related fractures has increased nearly twofold in the last decade. Because of problems associated with anterior screw fixation such as loosening, mechanical failure, and the weakness of osteoporotic bone, current surgical treatments of vertebral body (VB) fractures are problematic. This is due to poor fixation strength of anterior screws in the adjacent segments. The aim of this study was to determine whether a new cemented and uncemented VB screw provides improved primary stability following placement of anterior instrumentation in cases of fracture.

METHODS

The primary stability-related parameters of a new uncemented/cemented screw were compared with those of conventional monocortical screw fixation in a burst fracture model in which strut graft and anterior overbridging instrumentation were used. The use of the new uncemented screw improved the range of motion (ROM) of the stabilized spine in flexion-extension by approximately 22%, in rotation by 20%, and in lateral bending by 15%. Additional cementation improved the ROM by approximately 41% in flexion-extension, 32% in rotation, and 30% in lateral bending compared with conventional monocortical screw fixation.

CONCLUSIONS

The new cannulated screw improves fixation strength and primary stability parameters. It is useful in the initial treatment of fractures in cases of poor bone quality and as a rescue device if previously inserted screws do not remain securely in place.

Current concepts in anterior surgery for thoracolumbar trauma

Our goals in writing this article are to facilitate understanding of issues related to (1) why anterior fixation for thoracolumbar fractures are an important tool for managing these injuries, (2) when to perform these as a single procedure, or in combination with other procedures such as vertebrectomy and/or posterior stabilization and fusion, (3) to appreciate the biomechanical and design-related issues of available systems, and (4) what the clinical outcomes are following these procedures.

Reconstruction of the anterior column of the thoracic and lumbar spine with a carbon fiber stackable cage system

A carbon fiber stackable cage system is presented to promote the reconstruction of the anterior column after vertebrectomy or corpectomy in tumor and trauma surgery. Modularity, immediate stability, early fusion of the graft, radiolucency, and no risk of disease transmission are the main advantages of this system.

Biomechanical evaluation of diagonal fixation in pedicle screw instrumentation

STUDY DESIGN

Flexibility tests and finite element analyses were performed for the biomechanical evaluation of diagonal transfixation in pedicle screw instrumentation.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the biomechanical advantages of diagonal transfixation compared with conventional horizontal transfixation.

SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA

A few pedicle screw instrumentation systems allow the use of cross-links in the diagonal direction. Such a diagonal transfixation is anticipated to improve the surgical construct stability, but its biomechanical qualities have not been completely evaluated.

METHODS

Flexibility tests were performed on 10 calf lumbar spines (L2-L5). Specimens were subjected to pure moments up to 8.2 Nm in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and extension while the resulting movements of L3 and L4 were measured by a three-dimensional motion analysis system. The tested cases included (1) intact, (2) pedicle screw fixation without transfixation after total removal of the L3-L4 disc, (3) pedicle screw fixation with diagonal transfixation, and (4) pedicle screw fixation with horizontal transfixation. Three-dimensional finite element models of the tested surgical constructs were also developed by use of three-dimensional beam elements to investigate the effect of diagonal transfixation and horizontal transfixation on the construct stability and the corresponding stress changes in the screws.

RESULTS

When compared with no transfixation, horizontal transfixation significantly improved the lateral bending and axial rotation stability by 15.7% and 13.9%, respectively, but there was no improvement of stability in flexion and extension. By contrast, diagonal transfixation significantly improved the flexion and extension stability by 12% and 10.7%, respectively, but not the lateral bending and axial rotation stability in comparison with no transfixation. Comparison between horizontal transfixation and diagonal transfixation showed that the stabilizing effect of diagonal transfixation was greater in flexion and extension (13% and 11%, P < 0.01) than that of horizontal transfixation but smaller in lateral bending (11%, P < 0.05) and axial rotation (6.6%, P > 0.1). Finite element model predictions of the motion changes were similar to the changes observed in flexibility tests. In horizontal transfixation, the load changes, compared with no transfixion, were a 0.02% increase in flexion-extension, a 27.5% increase in lateral bending, and a 58% decrease in axial rotation, and the magnitudes of the moments applied on both the right and left pedicle screws were identical. However, when diagonal transfixation was achieved by connecting the left superior screw and the right inferior screw, the loads in the left screw were increased by 11.5% in flexion-extension, 43.6% in lateral bending, and 7.9% in axial rotation, whereas the loads in the right screw were decreased by 10.9% in flexion-extension, increased by 0.06% in lateral bending, and decreased by 18.1% in axial rotation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that diagonal transfixation provides more rigid fixation in flexion and extension but less in lateral bending and axial rotation in comparison with horizontal transfixation. Furthermore, greater stresses in the pedicle screws were predicted in the diagonal transfixation model. These limitations of diagonal transfixation should be considered carefully for clinical application.

Pedicle screw adjustments affect stability of thoracolumbar burst fracture

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro biomechanical study of the stabilizing effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on experimental thoracolumbar burst fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of different adjustments applied by the pedicle screw fixation device on the stability of the spine-device construct.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Pedicle screw devices are widely used to accomplish spinal reduction and provide stability to an injured spine. In previous biomechanical studies the stability of the spine-device constructs has been examined for many devices. However, no study has quantitatively assessed the associations between the device adjustments and the stability of the construct.

METHODS

Five-vertebrae human cadaveric specimens with burst fracture at L1 vertebra were studied. Pedicle screw fixation device was attached to the T12 and L2 vertebrae. Five device adjustments (pure compression, pure distraction, pure extension, a combination distraction-extension, and neutral posture) were studied. Multidirectional flexibility test was performed when intact, after burst fracture, and after each device adjustment to document spinal stability.

RESULTS

The construct stability had a complex association to the device adjustment. For example, the maximum flexion and extension stabilities were achieved by pure compression and distraction-extension combination adjustments, respectively. Pure distraction and pure extension adjustments decreased the construct stability.

CONCLUSIONS

The device adjustments affected the spinal construct stability differently in different directions. Although pure compression provided the most stability in most directions, the combined distraction-extension adjustment may be more suitable considering the neural decompression also.

In vitro biomechanical analysis of three anterior thoracolumbar implants

OBJECT

The goal of this study was to evaluate the comparative efficacy of three commonly used anterior thoracolumbar implants: the anterior thoracolumbar locking plate (ATLP), the smooth-rod Kaneda (SRK), and the Z-plate.

METHODS

In vitro testing was performed using the T9-L3 segments of human cadaver spines. An L-1 corpectomy was performed, and stabilization was achieved using one of three anterior devices: the ATLP in nine spines, the SRK in 10, and the Z-plate in 10. Specimens were load tested with 1.5-, 3-, 4.5-, and 6-Nm in flexion and extension, right and left lateral bending, and right and left axial rotation. Angular motion was monitored using two video cameras that tracked light-emitting diodes attached to the vertebral bodies. Testing was performed in the intact state in spines stabilized with one of the three aforementioned devices after the devices had been fatigued to 5000 cycles at +/- 3 Nm and after bilateral facetectomy. There was no difference in the stability of the intact spines with use of the three devices. There were no differences between the SRK- and Z-plate-instrumented spines in any state. In extension testing, the mean angular rotation (+/- standard deviation) of spines instrumented with the SRK (4.7 +/- 3.2 degrees) and Z-plate devices (3.3 +/- 2.3 degrees) was more rigid than that observed in the ATLP-stabilized spines (9 +/- 4.8 degrees). In flexion testing after induction of fatigue, however, only the SRK (4.2 +/- 3.2 degrees) was stiffer than the ATLP (8.9 +/- 4.9 degrees). Also, in extension postfatigue, only the SRK (2.4 +/- 3.4 degrees) provided more rigid fixation than the ATLP (6.4 +/- 2.9 degrees). All three devices were equally unstable after bilateral facetectomy. The SRK and Z-plate anterior thoracolumbar implants were both more rigid than the ATLP, and of the former two the SRK was stiffer.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' results suggest that in cases in which profile and ease of application are not of paramount importance, the SRK has an advantage over the other two tested implants in achieving rigid fixation immediately postoperatively.

Primary lumbosacral stability after open posterior and endoscopic anterior fusion with interbody implants: a roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis

STUDY DESIGN

After posterior stabilization of the spondylolytic lumbosacral level, mobility of the fused vertebrae could be studied before and after an additional anterior endoscopic interbody fusion using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the in vivo primary lumbosacral stability of additional anterior interbody fusion after transpedicular screw fixation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

In vitro studies indicate a significant decrease in segmental motion after pedicle screw fixation and additional anterior fusion. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric studies demonstrate the adequacy of transpedicular lumbar instrumentation in posterolateral fusions. There are no studies examining the effect of additional anterior interbody fusion after posterior instrumentation in vivo.

METHODS

In this study, 15 patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis at L5-S1 underwent a two-stage open posterior and endoscopic anterior lumbar fusion using carbon fiber (Brantigan I/F) cages. At surgery, tantalum markers were implanted into the fifth lumbar (L5) and the first sacral (S1) vertebra. All the patients were examined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis after the first and second surgical procedures.

RESULTS

After implantation of the posterior pedicle system only, the mean intervertebral mobility determined by roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis was 0.23 mm in the transverse (x), 0.54 mm in the vertical (y), and 1.2 mm in the sagittal (z) axes. After additional anterior endoscopic fusion with carbon cages, the remaining translation between the fused segment L5/S1 decreased to 0.17 mm in the x, 0.16 mm in the y, and 0.44 mm in the z axes.

CONCLUSION

Anterior endoscopic lumbosacral fusion significantly increases the primary stability of the posterior fusion with a pedicle system in two axes of motion.

In vitro flexibility of an experimental pedicle screw and plate instrumentation system on the porcine lumbar spine

The positive correlation between spinal construct stiffness and fusion rate has led to the use of increasingly rigid surgical spinal instrumentation systems. Unfortunately, however, these rigid systems have also been correlated with sub-optimal fusion quality measures. To date, in vivo studies to explore these relationships have involved the use of different implants and surgical procedures to influence the biomechanical environment at the fusion site. In order to avoid these confounding variables, a novel experimental instrumentation system has been developed which is capable of independently controlling spinal construct flexibility (inverse of stiffness). In the present study, this experimental pedicle screw and plate system was subjected to rigorous pure moment flexibility testing in flexion-extension and lateral bending using an in vitro porcine lumbar spine model. Analysis of the data showed that the system provided a reproducible, stepwise-modulated spinal construct flexibility as measured by neutral zone flexibility, laxity angle and range of motion parameters. Differences in flexibility were most evident using the neutral zone parameters (neutral zone flexibility and laxity angle). This is of particular interest given that the clinical instability of a spinal segment may be related to its behaviour within the neutral zone. This information will ultimately guide the design of improved human spinal instrumentation systems.

Biomechanical effect of anterior grafting devices on the rotational stability of spinal constructs

In the thoracolumbar spine, frequently strut grafting is used to restore the anterior and middle column defects. Biomechanical stability of the surgical construct may be altered significantly depending on the type of anterior grafting devices. In this study, a biomechanical flexibility test was conducted to compare the stabilizing role of various types of anterior grafting devices, such as a polymethylmethacrylate block, tricortical iliac crest bone graft, one large Harms cage, and two small Harms cages using a calf lumbar corpectomy model. The Harms cage, especially one large cage, improved the axial rotational stability significantly in both anterior and posterior fixation groups as compared with the iliac bone or polymethylmethacrylate. No significant difference in the stabilizing role was found among different grafting devices in lateral bending, flexion, and extension. These results suggest that a more rigid spinal construct can be obtained by using a metal cage with improved friction at the cage-bone interface.

Stability analysis of an enhanced load sharing posterior fixation device and its equivalent conventional device in a calf spine model

STUDY DESIGN

An in vitro test of calf spine lumbar segments to compare biomechanical stabilization of a rigid versus a dynamic posterior fixation device.

OBJECTIVES

To compare flexibility of a dynamic pedicle screw fixation device with an equivalent rigid device.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Dynamic pedicle screw device studies are not as prevalent in the literature as studies of rigid devices. These devices contain the potential to enhance load sharing and optimize fusion potential while maintaining stability similar to that of rigid systems.

METHODS

Load-displacement tests were performed on intact and stabilized calf spines for the dynamic and rigid devices. Stability across a destabilized L3-L4 segment was restored by insertion of either a 6 mm x 40 mm dynamic or rigid pedicle screw fixation device across the L2-L4 segment. The screws then were removed, 7 mm x 45 mm pedicle screws of the opposite type were inserted, and the construct then was re-tested. Axial pull-out tests were performed to assess the likely effects of pedicle screw replacement on the load-displacement data.

RESULTS

Results indicated a 65% reduction in motion in flexion-extension and a 90% reduction in lateral bending across the destabilized level for both devices, compared with intact spine values. Reduction in axial rotation motion was much smaller than in other modes. Axial pull-out tests showed no weakening of the bone-screw interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Both devices provided significant stability of similar magnitudes in flexion, extension, and lateral bending. In axial rotation, the devices only could restore stability to levels similar to those in an intact spine. The dynamic device offers a design that may enhance load sharing without sacrificing construct stability.

The stability of reconstruction methods after thoracolumbar total spondylectomy. An in vitro investigation

STUDY DESIGN

After total spondylectomy, five types of spinal reconstruction techniques were compared biomechanically.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the stability provided by five reconstruction methods after total spondylectomy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Total spondylectomy presents a worst-case scenario for spinal reconstruction. However, few investigators have biomechanically investigated spinal reconstruction stability after total spondylectomy.

METHODS

Eight human cadaveric spines (T11-L5) were used. After intact analysis, a total spondylectomy was performed at L2 and reconstructed using Harms titanium mesh (Depuy-Motech, Warsaw, IN) as an anterior strut. Anterior, posterior, or circumferential instrumentation techniques were then performed using the Kaneda SR and ISOLA pedicle screw systems (AcroMed Corp., Cleveland, OH) as follows: 1) anterior instrumentation at L1-L3 with multisegmental posterior instrumentation at T12-L4 (AMP), 2) anterior instrumentation at L1-L3 with short posterior instrumentation at L1-L3 (ASP), 3) anterior instrumentation at L1-L3 (A), 4) multilevel posterior instrumentation at T12-L4 (MP), and 5) short posterior instrumentation at L1-L3 (SP). Nondestructive biomechanical testing was performed under axial compression, flexion-extension, and lateral bending loading modes.

RESULTS

Only circumferential instrumentation techniques (AMP, ASP) exhibited higher stiffness than the intact spine in all loading modes (P < 0.05). Short circumferential fixation provided more stability than did multilevel posterior instrumentation (P < 0.05). Multilevel posterior fixation provided more stiffness than did short posterior and anterior instrumentation alone (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Only circumferential fixation techniques provide more stability than the intact spine in all testing modes. Short circumferential instrumentation provides more stability than multilevel posterior instrumentation alone and requires fewer levels of spinal fusion.

Static and fatigue biomechanical properties of anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems. A synthetic testing model

STUDY DESIGN

A mechanical testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems was introduced, using a synthetic model. Twelve recent instrumentation systems were tested in static and fatigue modes.

OBJECTIVES

To establish the testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems using a synthetic model and to evaluate the static and fatigue biomechanical properties of 12 anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the biomechanics of anterior spinal instrumentation using a cadaveric or animal tissue, problems of specimen variation, lack of reproducibility, and inability to perform fatigue testing have been pointed out. In no studies has a precise synthetic testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems been described.

METHODS

An ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene cylinder was designed according to the anatomic dimensions of the vertebral body. Two cylinders spanned by spinal instrumentation simulated a total corpectomy defect, and a compressive lateral bending load was applied. The instrumentation assembly was precisely standardized. The static destructive and fatigue tests up to 2 million cycles at three load levels were conducted, followed by the failure mode analysis. Twelve anterior instrumentation systems, consisting of five plate and seven rod systems were compared in stiffness, bending strength, and cycles to failure.

RESULTS

Static and fatigue test parameters both demonstrated highly significant differences between devices. The stiffness ranged from 280.5 kN/m in the Synthes plate (Synthes, Paoli, PA) to 67.9 kN/m in the Z-plate ATL (SofamorDanek, Memphis, TN). The Synthes plate and Kaneda SR titanium (AcroMed, Cleveland, OH) formed the highest subset in bending strength of 1516.1 N and 1209.9 N, respectively, whereas the Z-plate showed the lowest value of 407.3 N. There were no substantial differences between plate and rod devices. In fatigue, only three systems: Synthes plate, Kaneda SR titanium, and Olerud plate (Nord Opedic AB, Sweden) withstood 2 million cycles at 600 N. The failure mode analysis demonstrated plate or bolt fractures in plate systems and rod fractures in rod systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The biomechanical testing standard for anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation systems was successfully designed. It provided a repeatable and consistent experimental condition and controlling dimensional and surgical factors. The comparison of 12 instrumentation systems highlights the importance of mechanically balanced device design without a weak link in the development of instrumentation.