1
|
Lirk P, Badaoui J, Stuempflen M, Hedayat M, Freys SM, Joshi GP. PROcedure-SPECific postoperative pain management guideline for laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A systematic review with recommendations for postoperative pain management. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2024; 41:161-173. [PMID: 38298101 DOI: 10.1097/eja.0000000000001945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common cancer diagnosed in women and third most common in men. Laparoscopic resection has become the standard surgical technique worldwide given its notable benefits, mainly the shorter length of stay and less postoperative pain. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current literature on postoperative pain management following laparoscopic colorectal surgery and update previous procedure-specific pain management recommendations. The primary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and opioid requirements. We also considered study quality, clinical relevance of trial design, and a comprehensive risk-benefit assessment of the analgesic intervention. We performed a literature search to identify randomised controlled studies (RCTs) published before January 2022. Seventy-two studies were included in the present analysis. Through the established PROSPECT process, we recommend basic analgesia (paracetamol for rectal surgery, and paracetamol with either a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug or cyclo-oxygenase-2-specific inhibitor for colonic surgery) and wound infiltration as first-line interventions. No consensus could be achieved either for the use of intrathecal morphine or intravenous lidocaine; no recommendation can be made for these interventions. However, intravenous lidocaine may be considered when basic analgesia cannot be provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Lirk
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital (PL, JB, MS), Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (MH), Department of Surgery, DIAKO Ev. Diakonie-Krankenhaus, Bremen, Germany (SMF) and Department of Anesthesiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA (GPJ)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bijkerk V, Jacobs LM, Albers KI, Gurusamy KS, van Laarhoven CJ, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1:CD013197. [PMID: 38288876 PMCID: PMC10825891 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013197.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred option for many procedures. To properly perform laparoscopic surgery, it is essential that sudden movements and abdominal contractions in patients are prevented, as it limits the surgeon's view. There has been a growing interest in the potential beneficial effect of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in laparoscopic surgery. Deep NMB improves the surgical field by preventing abdominal contractions, and it is thought to decrease postoperative pain. However, it is uncertain if deep NMB improves intraoperative safety and thereby improves clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of deep neuromuscular blockade versus no, shallow, or moderate neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic intra- or transperitoneal procedures in adults. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 31 July 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adults undergoing laparoscopic intra- or transperitoneal procedures comparing deep NMB to moderate, shallow, or no NMB. We excluded trials that did not report any of the primary or secondary outcomes of our review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. health-related quality of life, and 3. proportion of participants with serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 4. proportion of participants with non-serious adverse events, 5. readmissions within three months, 6. short-term pain scores, 7. measurements of postoperative recovery, and 8. operating time. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 42 randomised clinical trials with 3898 participants. Most trials included participants undergoing intraperitoneal oncological resection surgery. We present the Peto fixed-effect model for most dichotomous outcomes as only sparse events were reported. Comparison 1: deep versus moderate NMB Thirty-eight trials compared deep versus moderate NMB. Deep NMB may have no effect on mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (Peto odds ratio (OR) 7.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 115.43; 12 trials, 1390 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Deep NMB likely results in little to no difference in health-related quality of life up to four days postoperative (mean difference (MD) 4.53 favouring deep NMB on the Quality of Recovery-40 score, 95% CI 0.96 to 8.09; 5 trials, 440 participants; moderate-certainty evidence; mean difference lower than the mean clinically important difference of 10 points). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of deep NMB on intraoperatively serious adverse events (deep NMB 38/1150 versus moderate NMB 38/1076; Peto OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.52; 21 trials, 2231 participants; very low-certainty evidence), short-term serious adverse events (up to 60 days) (deep NMB 37/912 versus moderate NMB 42/852; Peto OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.42; 16 trials, 1764 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and short-term non-serious adverse events (Peto OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.35; 11 trials, 1232 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Deep NMB likely does not alter the duration of surgery (MD -0.51 minutes, 95% CI -3.35 to 2.32; 34 trials, 3143 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain if deep NMB alters the length of hospital stay (MD -0.22 days, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.06; 19 trials, 2084 participants; low-certainty evidence) or pain scores one hour after surgery (MD -0.31 points on the numeric rating scale, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.03; 22 trials, 1823 participants; very low-certainty evidence; mean clinically important difference 1 point) and 24 hours after surgery (MD -0.60 points on the numeric rating scale, 95% CI -1.05 to -0.15; 16 trials, 1404 participants; very low-certainty evidence; mean clinically important difference 1 point). Comparison 2: deep versus shallow NMB Three trials compared deep versus shallow NMB. The trials did not report on mortality and health-related quality of life. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of deep NMB compared to shallow NMB on the proportion of serious adverse events (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 5.57; 2 trials, 158 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Comparison 3: deep versus no NMB One trial compared deep versus no NMB. There was no mortality in this trial, and health-related quality of life was not reported. The proportion of serious adverse events was 0/25 in the deep NMB group and 1/25 in the no NMB group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the effects of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB on all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Deep NMB likely results in little to no difference in health-related quality of life and duration of surgery compared to moderate NMB, and it may have no effect on the length of hospital stay. Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we do not know what the effect is of deep NMB on non-serious adverse events, pain scores, or readmission rates. Randomised clinical trials with adequate reporting of all adverse events would reduce the current uncertainties. Due to the low number of identified trials and the very low certainty of evidence, we do not know what the effect of deep NMB on serious adverse events is compared to shallow NMB and no NMB. We found no trials evaluating mortality and health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Bijkerk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lotte Mc Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Kim I Albers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Christiaan Keijzer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Olesnicky BL, Farrell C, Clare P, Wen S, Leslie K, Delaney A. The effect of sugammadex on patient morbidity and quality of recovery after general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth 2024; 132:107-115. [PMID: 38036323 DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2023.10.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Residual neuromuscular block is associated with increased patient morbidity. Therefore prevention of residual neuromuscular block is an important component of general anaesthesia where neuromuscular blocking agents are used. Whereas sugammadex improves reversal based on neuromuscular twitch monitoring parameters, there have been no prospective, adequately powered definitive studies demonstrating that sugammadex is also associated with less patient morbidity. METHODS We performed a systematic review of randomised trials comparing sugammadex with anticholinesterase-based reversal or placebo reversal that reported important patient outcomes beyond the postanaesthesia care unit. RESULTS We identified 43 articles, including 5839 trial participants. Only one trial reported days alive and out of hospital to 30 days (DAOH-30), which showed that the number of DAOH-30 was similar in those allocated to sugammadex compared with neostigmine-based reversal (25 days [19-27] vs 24 days [21-27], median difference 0.00 [-2.15 to 2.15]). Pooled analyses of data from 16 trials showed an estimated odds ratio (OR) for postoperative pulmonary complications of 0.67 (95% confidence interval 0.47-0.95) with sugammadex use. Pooled analysis showed that pneumonia (eight trials OR 0.51 [0.24-1.01] with sugammadex use), hospital length of stay (23 trials, mean difference -0.31 [-0.84 to 0.22] with sugammadex use), and patient-reported quality of recovery (11 trials, varied depending on metric used) are similar in those allocated to sugammadex vs control. The difference seen in mortality (11 trials, OR 0.39 [0.15-1.01] with sugammadex use) would be considered to be clinically significant and warrants further investigation, however, the rarity of these events precludes drawing definitive conclusions. CONCLUSION Although few trials reported on DAOH-30 or important patient outcomes, sugammadex is associated with a reduction in postoperative pulmonary complications, however, this might not translate to a difference in hospital length of stay, patient-reported quality of recovery, or mortality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO database (CRD42022325858).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin L Olesnicky
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Northern Clinical School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Northern Sydney Anaesthetic Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Clare Farrell
- Department of Anaesthesia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phoebe Clare
- Department of Anaesthesia, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Northern Sydney Anaesthetic Research Institute, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shelly Wen
- Department of Anaesthesia, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kate Leslie
- Department of Critical Care, Melbourne Medical School, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony Delaney
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Critical Care Program, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Liu S, He B, Deng L, Li Q, Wang X. Does deep neuromuscular blockade provide improved perioperative outcomes in adult patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282790. [PMID: 36893114 PMCID: PMC9997990 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Deep neuromuscular blockade provides better surgical workspace conditions in laparoscopic surgery, but it is still not clear whether it improves perioperative outcomes, not to mention its role in other types of surgeries. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to investigate whether deep neuromuscular blockade versus other more superficial levels of neuromuscular blockade provides improved perioperative outcomes in adult patients in all types of surgeries. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar were searched from inception to June 25, 2022. Forty studies (3271 participants) were included. Deep neuromuscular blockade was associated with an increased rate of acceptable surgical condition (relative risk [RR]: 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [1.11, 1.27]), increased surgical condition score (MD: 0.52, 95% CI: [0.37, 0.67]), decreased rate of intraoperative movement (RR: 0.19, 95% CI: [0.10, 0.33]), fewer additional measures to improve the surgical condition (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: [0.43, 0.94]), and decreased pain score at 24 h (MD: -0.42, 95% CI: [-0.74, -0.10]). There was no significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss (MD: -22.80, 95% CI: [-48.83, 3.24]), duration of surgery (MD: -0.05, 95% CI: [-2.05, 1.95]), pain score at 48 h (MD: -0.49, 95% CI: [-1.03, 0.05]), or length of stay (MD: -0.05, 95% CI: [-0.19, 0.08]). These indicate that deep neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions and prevents intraoperative movement, and there is no sufficient evidence that deep neuromuscular blockade is associated with intraoperative blood loss, duration of surgery, complications, postoperative pain, and length of stay. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed, and more attention should be given to complications and the physiological mechanism behind deep neuromuscular blockade and postoperative outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyuan Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College & Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Bin He
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College & Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lei Deng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College & Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiyan Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College & Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xiong Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, Clinical Medical College & Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu EB, Hung CT, Luo SD, Wu SC, Lee TY, Chin JC, Tsai PN, Yang JCS. Analgesic and Anesthetic Efficacy of Rocuronium/Sugammadex in Otorhinolaryngologic Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15070894. [PMID: 35890192 PMCID: PMC9318942 DOI: 10.3390/ph15070894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of rocuronium/sugammadex in otorhinolaryngologic surgery improves intubation conditions and surgical rating scales. This study primarily aimed to evaluate the effect of the combination of rocuronium and sugammadex on intraoperative anesthetic consumption. The secondary outcomes were the intraoperative and postoperative morphine milligram equivalent (MME) consumption, duration of intraoperative hypertension, extubation time, incidence of delayed extubation and postoperative nausea and vomiting, pain score, and length of stay. A total of 2848 patients underwent otorhinolaryngologic surgery at a tertiary medical center in southern Taiwan. After applying the exclusion criteria, 2648 of these cases were included, with 167 and 2481 in the rocuronium/sugammadex and cisatracurium/neostigmine groups, respectively. To reduce potential bias, 119 patients in each group were matched by propensity scores for sex, age, body weight, and type of surgery. We found that the rocuronium/sugammadex group was associated with significant preservation of the intraoperative sevoflurane and MME consumption, with reductions of 14.2% (p = 0.009) and 11.8% (p = 0.035), respectively. The use of the combination of rocuronium and sugammadex also significantly increased the dose of intraoperative labetalol (p = 0.002), although there was no significant difference in intraoperative hypertensive events between both groups. In conclusion, our results may encourage the use of the combination of rocuronium and sugammadex as part of volatile-sparing and opioid-sparing anesthesia in otorhinolaryngologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- En-Bo Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Song Dist., Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (C.-T.H.); (S.-C.W.); (P.-N.T.)
| | - Chao-Ting Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Song Dist., Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (C.-T.H.); (S.-C.W.); (P.-N.T.)
| | - Sheng-Dean Luo
- Department of Otolaryngology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan;
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan
| | - Shao-Chun Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Song Dist., Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (C.-T.H.); (S.-C.W.); (P.-N.T.)
| | - Tsung-Yang Lee
- Department of Anesthesiology, Jen-Ai Hospital, Taichung 412, Taiwan;
| | - Jo-Chi Chin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Park One International Hospital, No. 100, Bo’ai 2nd Rd., Zuoying Dist., Kaohsiung City 813, Taiwan;
| | - Peng-Neng Tsai
- Department of Anesthesiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, No. 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Song Dist., Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan; (E.-B.W.); (C.-T.H.); (S.-C.W.); (P.-N.T.)
| | - Johnson Chia-Shen Yang
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 123, Ta-Pei Rd., Niao-Song Dist., Kaohsiung City 833, Taiwan
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +886-7-7317123 (ext. 2788)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deep versus Moderate Neuromuscular Blockade in Gynecologic Laparoscopic Operations: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12040561. [PMID: 35455677 PMCID: PMC9032163 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12040561] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: To investigate whether deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves surgical conditions and postoperative pain compared to moderate block, in patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Methods: A single blind, randomized, controlled trial was undertaken with laparoscopic gynecologic surgical patients, who were randomly assigned to one of the following two groups: patients in the first group received deep NMB (PTC 0-1) and in the other, moderate NMB (TOF 0-1). Primary outcomes included assessing the surgical conditions using a four-grade scale, ranging from 0 (extremely poor) to 3 (optimal), and patients’ postoperative pain was evaluated with a five-grade Likert scale and the analgesic consumption. Results: 144 patients were analyzed as follows: 73 patients received deep NMB and 71 moderate NMB. Mean surgical field scores were comparable between the two groups (2.44 for moderate vs. 2.68 for deep NMB). Regarding postoperative pain scores, the patients in the deep NMB experienced significantly less pain than in the group of moderate NMB (0.79 vs. 1.58, p < 0.001). Moreover, when the consumption of analgesic drugs was compared, the moderate NMB group needed more extra opioid analgesia than the deep NMB group (18.3% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.007). From the secondary endpoints, an interesting finding of the study was that patients on deep NMB had significantly fewer incidents of subcutaneous emphysema. Conclusions: Our data show that, during the performance of gynecologic laparoscopic surgery, deep NMB offers no advantage of operating filed conditions compared with moderate NMB. Patients may benefit from the deep block as it may reduce postoperative pain.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen C, Zhou K, Wang H, Lu Y, Wang Z, Xiao R, Lu T. TMSF-Net: Multi-series fusion network with treeconnect for colorectal tumor segmentation. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2022; 215:106613. [PMID: 34998166 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2021] [Revised: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/29/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal tumors are common clinical diseases. Automatic segmentation of colorectal tumors captured in computed tomography (CT) images can provide numerous possibilities for computer-assisted treatment. Obtaining large datasets is expensive, and completing labeling is time- and manpower-consuming. To solve the challenge using a limited pathological dataset, this paper proposes a multi-series fusion network with treeconnect (TMSF-Net), which can automatically achieve colorectal tumor segmentation using CT images. METHODS To drive the TMSF-Net, three-series enhanced CT images were collected from all patients to improve the data characteristics. In the TMSF-Net, the coding path was designed as a three-branch structure to realize the feature extraction of the different series. Subsequently, the three branches were merged to start the feature analysis in the decoding path. To achieve the objective of feature fusion, different layers in the decoding path fused feature maps from the upper layer in the encoding path to achieve a cross-scale fusion. In addition, to reduce the problem of parameter redundancy, this study adopted a three-dimensional treeconnect to complete data connection on three branches. RESULTS A total of 22 cases were conducted by ablation and comparative experiments to test the TMSF-Net. The results showed that the TMSF-Net can improve the network performance by multiseries fusion, and its expressiveness is better than many classic networks. CONCLUSION The TMSF-Net is a many-to-one structure network, which can enhance the network learning ability and improve the analysis of potential features. Therefore, it yields good results in colorectal tumor segmentation. It can provide a new direction for neural network models based on feature fusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng Chen
- The School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Kangneng Zhou
- The School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Huilin Wang
- The School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
| | - YuanYuan Lu
- The Department of Ultrasound, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Zhiliang Wang
- The School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
| | - Ruoxiu Xiao
- The School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China; Beijing Engineering and Technology Center for Convergence Networks and Ubiquitous Services, School of Computer and Communication Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.
| | - Tingting Lu
- The Department of Anorectal Surgery, The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110122, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Murphy GS. Pro: Deep neuromuscular blockade should be maintained during laparoscopic surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med 2021; 40:100918. [PMID: 34182167 DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Glenn S Murphy
- Illinois Masonic Hospital, 836 West Wellington Avenue; Suite 4815, Chicago, IL 60657, United States.
| |
Collapse
|