1
|
Albers-Warlé KI, Reijnders-Boerboom GTJA, Bijkerk V, Torensma B, Panhuizen IF, Snoeck MMJ, Fuchs-Buder T, Keijzer C, Dahan A, Warlé MC. A Practical Dosing Algorithm for Deep Neuromuscular Blockade During Total Intravenous Anesthesia: ROCURITHM. Anesthesiology 2024:141384. [PMID: 38728093 DOI: 10.1097/aln.0000000000005050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of trials investigating the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on surgical conditions and patient outcomes is steadily increasing. Consensus on which surgical procedures benefit from deep NMB (a post tetanic count of 1-2) and how to implement it has not been reached. The ESAIC does not advise routine application but recommends use of deep NMB to improve surgical conditions on indication. This study investigates the optimal dosing strategy to reach and maintain adequate deep NMB during total intravenous anesthesia. METHODS Data from three trials investigating deep NMB during laparoscopic surgery with TIVA (n=424) was pooled to analyze the required rocuronium dose, when to start continuous infusion and how to adjust. The resulting algorithm was validated (n=32) and compared to the success rate in ongoing studies where the algorithm was not used (n=180). RESULTS The mean rocuronium dose based on actual bodyweight for PTC 1-2 was 1.0 ± 0.27 mg.kg -1.h -1 in the trials where mean duration of surgery was ±2 hours (116 minutes). An induction dose of 0.6 mg.kg -1 lead to a PTC of 1-5 in a quarter of patients after a mean of 11 minutes. The remaining patients were equally divided over too shallow (additional bolus and direct start of continuous infusion) or too deep; a ±15-minute wait after PTC 0 for return of PTC to ≥1. Using the proposed algorithm, a mean 76% of all 5-minute measurements throughout surgery were on target PTC 1-2 in the validation cohort. The algorithm performed significantly better than anesthesiology residents without the algorithm, even after a learning curve from 0-20 patients (42% on target, P≤.001, Cohen's d=1.4 [95% CI 0.9, 1.8]) to 81-100 patients (61% on target, P≤.05, Cohen's d=0.7 [95% CI 0.1, 1.2]). CONCLUSIONS We propose a dosing algorithm for deep NMB with rocuronium in patients receiving TIVA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim I Albers-Warlé
- Resident, department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ; ;
| | | | - Veerle Bijkerk
- Resident, department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ; ;
| | - Bart Torensma
- Clinical epidemiologist, department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Ivo F Panhuizen
- Anesthesiologist, department of Anesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ;
| | - Marc M J Snoeck
- Anesthesiologist, department of Anesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. ;
| | - Thomas Fuchs-Buder
- Professor and anesthesiologist, département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy/Brabois, Nancy, France.
| | - Christiaan Keijzer
- Anesthesiologist, department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Dahan
- Professor and anesthesiologist, department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Associate professor and vascular surgeon, department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jacobs LM, Helder LS, Albers KI, Kranendonk J, Keijzer C, Joosten LA, Strobbe LJ, Warlé MC. The role of surgical tissue injury and intraoperative sympathetic activation in postoperative immunosuppression after breast-conserving surgery versus mastectomy: a prospective observational study. Breast Cancer Res 2024; 26:42. [PMID: 38468349 PMCID: PMC10926636 DOI: 10.1186/s13058-024-01801-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the second most common cause of death from cancer in women worldwide. Counterintuitively, large population-based retrospective trials report better survival after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) compared to mastectomy, corrected for tumour- and patient variables. More extensive surgical tissue injury and activation of the sympathetic nervous system by nociceptive stimuli are associated with immune suppression. We hypothesized that mastectomy causes a higher expression of plasma damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and more intraoperative sympathetic activation which induce postoperative immune dysregulation. Immune suppression can lead to postoperative complications and affect tumour-free survival. METHODS In this prospective observational study, plasma DAMPs (HMGB1, HSP70, S100A8/A9 and S100A12), intraoperative sympathetic activation (Nociception Level (NOL) index from 0 to 100), and postoperative immune function (plasma cytokine concentrations and ex vivo cytokine production capacity) were compared in patients undergoing elective BCS (n = 20) versus mastectomy (n = 20). RESULTS Ex vivo cytokine production capacity of TNF, IL-6 and IL-1β was nearly absent in both groups one hour after surgery. Levels appeared recovered on postoperative day 3 (POD3), with significantly higher ex vivo production capacity of IL-1β after BCS (p = .041) compared to mastectomy. Plasma concentration of IL-6 was higher one hour after mastectomy (p = .045). Concentrations of plasma alarmins S100A8/A9 and S100A12 were significantly higher on POD3 after mastectomy (p = .003 and p = .041, respectively). Regression analysis showed a significantly lower percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 (absence of nociception) during mastectomy when corrected for norepinephrine equivalents (36% versus 45% respectively, p = .038). Percentage of NOL measurements ≤ 8 of all patients correlated with ex vivo cytokine production capacity of IL-1β and TNF on POD3 (r = .408; p = .011 and r = .500; p = .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This pilot study revealed substantial early postoperative immune suppression after BCS and mastectomy that appears to recover in the following days. Differences between BCS and mastectomy in release of DAMPs and intraoperative sympathetic activation could affect postoperative immune homeostasis and thereby contribute to the better survival reported after BCS in previous large population-based retrospective trials. These results endorse further exploration of (1) S100 alarmins as potential therapeutic targets in breast cancer surgery and (2) suppression of intraoperative sympathetic activation to substantiate the observed association with postoperative immune dysregulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte Mc Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Leonie S Helder
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kim I Albers
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Josephine Kranendonk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands
| | | | - Leo Ab Joosten
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud Institute of Molecular Life Sciences, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Genetics, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj- Napoca, Romania
| | - Luc Ja Strobbe
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Groh LA, Willems LH, Fintelman P, Reijnen MMPJ, El Messaoudi S, Warlé MC. Dual-Pathway Inhibition with Rivaroxaban and Low-Dose Aspirin Does Not Alter Immune Cell Responsiveness and Distribution in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease. Cardiol Ther 2024; 13:233-242. [PMID: 38055176 PMCID: PMC10899137 DOI: 10.1007/s40119-023-00342-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are the leading cause of death globally. Inflammation is an important driver of CVD where tissue damage may lead to the formation of deadly thrombi. Therefore, antithrombotic drugs, such as platelet inhibitors, are crucial for secondary risk prevention in coronary artery disease (CAD) and peripheral artery disease (PAD). For severe forms of the disease, dual-pathway inhibition (DPI) where low-dose aspirin is combined with rivaroxaban has shown improved efficacy in reducing cardiovascular mortality. METHODS Given this greater improvement in mortality, and the importance of inflammation in driving atherosclerosis, the potential for off-target inflammation-lowering effects of these drugs was evaluated by looking at the change in immune cell distribution and responsiveness to ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation after 3 months of DPI in patients with CAD. RESULTS We observed no changes in whole blood or peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) immune cell responsiveness to LPS after 3 months of DPI. Additionally, we did not observe any changes in the distribution of total white blood cells, monocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, or platelets during the study course. Signs of systemic inflammation were studied using Olink proteomics in 33 patients with PAD after 3 months of DPI. No changes were observed in any of the inflammatory proteins measured after the treatment period, suggesting that the state of chronic inflammation was not altered in these subjects. CONCLUSION Three months of DPI does not result in any meaningful change in immune cell responsiveness and distribution in patients with CAD or PAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05210725.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laszlo A Groh
- Department of Surgery (Internal Address 618), Radboud University Medical Center, Postal Address 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Loes H Willems
- Department of Surgery (Internal Address 618), Radboud University Medical Center, Postal Address 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Paula Fintelman
- Department of Surgery (Internal Address 618), Radboud University Medical Center, Postal Address 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michel M P J Reijnen
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
- Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Saloua El Messaoudi
- Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery (Internal Address 618), Radboud University Medical Center, Postal Address 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mazzinari G, Rovira L, Albers-Warlé KI, Warlé MC, Argente-Navarro P, Flor B, Diaz-Cambronero O. Underneath Images and Robots, Looking Deeper into the Pneumoperitoneum: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:1080. [PMID: 38398395 PMCID: PMC10889570 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13041080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/10/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopy offers numerous advantages over open procedures, minimizing trauma, reducing pain, accelerating recovery, and shortening hospital stays. Despite other technical advancements, pneumoperitoneum insufflation has received little attention, barely evolving since its inception. We explore the impact of pneumoperitoneum on patient outcomes and advocate for a minimally invasive approach that prioritizes peritoneal homeostasis. The nonlinear relationship between intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) and intra-abdominal volume (IAV) is discussed, emphasizing IAP titration to balance physiological effects and surgical workspace. Maintaining IAP below 10 mmHg is generally recommended, but factors such as patient positioning and surgical complexity must be considered. The depth of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is explored as another variable affecting laparoscopic conditions. While deep NMB appears favorable for surgical stillness, achieving a balance between IAP and NMB depth is crucial. Temperature and humidity management during pneumoperitoneum are crucial for patient safety and optical field quality. Despite the debate over the significance of temperature drop, humidification and the warming of insufflated gas offer benefits in peritoneal homeostasis and visual clarity. In conclusion, there is potential for a paradigm shift in pneumoperitoneum management, with dynamic IAP adjustments and careful control of insufflated gas temperature and humidity to preserve peritoneal homeostasis and improve patient outcomes in minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
- Department of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Valencia, Calle Doctor Moliner 50, 46100 Burjassot, Spain
| | - Lucas Rovira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, L’Olivereta, 46014 València, Spain; (L.R.); (B.F.)
| | - Kim I. Albers-Warlé
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain;
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Departments of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | - Pilar Argente-Navarro
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
| | - Blas Flor
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, L’Olivereta, 46014 València, Spain; (L.R.); (B.F.)
| | - Oscar Diaz-Cambronero
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Health Research Institute la Fe, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain; (P.A.-N.); (O.D.-C.)
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fe University Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bijkerk V, Jacobs LM, Albers KI, Gurusamy KS, van Laarhoven CJ, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. Deep neuromuscular blockade in adults undergoing an abdominal laparoscopic procedure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2024; 1:CD013197. [PMID: 38288876 PMCID: PMC10825891 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd013197.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic surgery is the preferred option for many procedures. To properly perform laparoscopic surgery, it is essential that sudden movements and abdominal contractions in patients are prevented, as it limits the surgeon's view. There has been a growing interest in the potential beneficial effect of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) in laparoscopic surgery. Deep NMB improves the surgical field by preventing abdominal contractions, and it is thought to decrease postoperative pain. However, it is uncertain if deep NMB improves intraoperative safety and thereby improves clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the benefits and harms of deep neuromuscular blockade versus no, shallow, or moderate neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic intra- or transperitoneal procedures in adults. SEARCH METHODS We used standard, extensive Cochrane search methods. The latest search date was 31 July 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomised clinical trials (irrespective of language, blinding, or publication status) in adults undergoing laparoscopic intra- or transperitoneal procedures comparing deep NMB to moderate, shallow, or no NMB. We excluded trials that did not report any of the primary or secondary outcomes of our review. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were 1. all-cause mortality, 2. health-related quality of life, and 3. proportion of participants with serious adverse events. Our secondary outcomes were 4. proportion of participants with non-serious adverse events, 5. readmissions within three months, 6. short-term pain scores, 7. measurements of postoperative recovery, and 8. operating time. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS We included 42 randomised clinical trials with 3898 participants. Most trials included participants undergoing intraperitoneal oncological resection surgery. We present the Peto fixed-effect model for most dichotomous outcomes as only sparse events were reported. Comparison 1: deep versus moderate NMB Thirty-eight trials compared deep versus moderate NMB. Deep NMB may have no effect on mortality, but the evidence is very uncertain (Peto odds ratio (OR) 7.22, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45 to 115.43; 12 trials, 1390 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Deep NMB likely results in little to no difference in health-related quality of life up to four days postoperative (mean difference (MD) 4.53 favouring deep NMB on the Quality of Recovery-40 score, 95% CI 0.96 to 8.09; 5 trials, 440 participants; moderate-certainty evidence; mean difference lower than the mean clinically important difference of 10 points). The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of deep NMB on intraoperatively serious adverse events (deep NMB 38/1150 versus moderate NMB 38/1076; Peto OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.59 to 1.52; 21 trials, 2231 participants; very low-certainty evidence), short-term serious adverse events (up to 60 days) (deep NMB 37/912 versus moderate NMB 42/852; Peto OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.42; 16 trials, 1764 participants; very low-certainty evidence), and short-term non-serious adverse events (Peto OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65 to 1.35; 11 trials, 1232 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Deep NMB likely does not alter the duration of surgery (MD -0.51 minutes, 95% CI -3.35 to 2.32; 34 trials, 3143 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is uncertain if deep NMB alters the length of hospital stay (MD -0.22 days, 95% CI -0.49 to 0.06; 19 trials, 2084 participants; low-certainty evidence) or pain scores one hour after surgery (MD -0.31 points on the numeric rating scale, 95% CI -0.59 to -0.03; 22 trials, 1823 participants; very low-certainty evidence; mean clinically important difference 1 point) and 24 hours after surgery (MD -0.60 points on the numeric rating scale, 95% CI -1.05 to -0.15; 16 trials, 1404 participants; very low-certainty evidence; mean clinically important difference 1 point). Comparison 2: deep versus shallow NMB Three trials compared deep versus shallow NMB. The trials did not report on mortality and health-related quality of life. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of deep NMB compared to shallow NMB on the proportion of serious adverse events (RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.50 to 5.57; 2 trials, 158 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Comparison 3: deep versus no NMB One trial compared deep versus no NMB. There was no mortality in this trial, and health-related quality of life was not reported. The proportion of serious adverse events was 0/25 in the deep NMB group and 1/25 in the no NMB group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS There was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions about the effects of deep NMB compared to moderate NMB on all-cause mortality and serious adverse events. Deep NMB likely results in little to no difference in health-related quality of life and duration of surgery compared to moderate NMB, and it may have no effect on the length of hospital stay. Due to the very low-certainty evidence, we do not know what the effect is of deep NMB on non-serious adverse events, pain scores, or readmission rates. Randomised clinical trials with adequate reporting of all adverse events would reduce the current uncertainties. Due to the low number of identified trials and the very low certainty of evidence, we do not know what the effect of deep NMB on serious adverse events is compared to shallow NMB and no NMB. We found no trials evaluating mortality and health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Bijkerk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Lotte Mc Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Kim I Albers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Christiaan Keijzer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Mazzinari G, Albers-Warlé KI, Rovira L, Warlé MC, Diaz Cambronero O, Navarro MPA. The why and how of the minimally invasive pneumoperitoneum in present-day laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg 2024:S0002-9610(24)00022-9. [PMID: 38302368 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Revised: 12/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Mazzinari
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Statistics and Operational Research, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
| | - Kim I Albers-Warlé
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Lucas Rovira
- Department of Anesthesiology, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Departments of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Oscar Diaz Cambronero
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Maria Pilar Argente Navarro
- Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jacobs LMC, Wintjens MSJN, Nagy M, Willems L, ten Cate H, Spronk HMH, van Kuijk SMJ, Ghossein-Doha C, Netea MG, Groh LA, van Petersen AS, Warlé MC. Biomarkers of sustained systemic inflammation and microvascular dysfunction associated with post-COVID-19 condition symptoms at 24 months after SARS-CoV-2-infection. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1182182. [PMID: 37868959 PMCID: PMC10586198 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1182182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Comprehensive studies investigating sustained hypercoagulability, endothelial function, and/or inflammation in relation to post-COVID-19 (PCC) symptoms with a prolonged follow-up are currently lacking. Therefore, the aim of this single-centre cohort study was to investigate serum biomarkers of coagulation activation, microvascular dysfunction, and inflammation in relation to persisting symptoms two years after acute COVID-19. Methods Patients diagnosed with acute SARS-CoV-2 infection between February and June 2020 were recruited. Outcome measures included the CORona Follow-Up (CORFU) questionnaire, which is based on an internationally developed and partially validated basic questionnaire on persistent PCC symptoms. Additionally, plasma biomarkers reflecting coagulation activation, endothelial dysfunction and systemic inflammation were measured. Results 167 individuals were approached of which 148 (89%) completed the CORFU questionnaire. At 24 months after acute infection, fatigue was the most prevalent PCC symptom (84.5%). Over 50% of the patients experienced symptoms related to breathing, cognition, sleep or mobility; 30.3% still experienced at least one severe or extreme (4 or 5 on a 5-point scale) PCC symptom. Multiple correlations were found between several PCC symptoms and markers of endothelial dysfunction (endothelin-1 and von Willebrand factor) and systemic inflammation (Interleukin-1 Receptor antagonist). No positive correlations were found between PCC symptoms and coagulation complexes. Discussion In conclusion, this study shows that at 24 months after acute COVID-19 infection patients experience a high prevalence of PCC symptoms which correlate with inflammatory cytokine IL-1Ra and markers of endothelial dysfunction, especially endothelin-1. Our data may provide a rationale for the selection of treatment strategies for further clinical studies. Trial registration This study was performed in collaboration with the CORona Follow-Up (CORFU) study (NCT05240742, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/ NCT05240742).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte M. C. Jacobs
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Marieke S. J. N. Wintjens
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Magdolna Nagy
- Department of Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Loes Willems
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hugo ten Cate
- Department of Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Center for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Henri M. H. Spronk
- Department of Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Sander M. J. van Kuijk
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Chahinda Ghossein-Doha
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center+ (UMC+), Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Mihai G. Netea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Center for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology and Metabolism, Life & Medical Sciences Institute, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Laszlo A. Groh
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Center (UMC), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Alvi AS, Nasir JA, Nizam MA, Hamdani MM, Bhangar NA, Sibtain SA, Lalani AS, Warlé MC. Quadratus lumborum block and transversus abdominis plane block in laparoscopic nephrectomy: a meta-analysis. Pain Manag 2023; 13:555-567. [PMID: 37718911 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2023-0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: To study the efficacy of quadratus lumborum block (QLB) and transversus abdominis plane (TAP) in laparoscopic nephrectomy patients. Materials & methods: We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials for QLB and/or TAP technique compared with each other or a control. Results: Direct analysis of 24 h post-op pain score at rest for each compared with control showed significant reduction, QLB (mean differences [MD] [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.87,-0.36]; p = 0.004) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.36 [-0.59, -0.12]; p = 0.003). With movement both were respectively lower than control QLB (MD [95% CI]: -1.12 [-1.51, -0.72]; p = <0.0001) and TAP (MD [95% CI]: -0.50 [-0.95, -0.05]; p = 0.03). Moreover, QLB demonstrated less risk 24 h of post-op nausea vomiting (PONV) versus control (PONV; risk ratios [RR] [95% CI]: 0.64 [0.45,0.90]; p = 0.01). Conclusion: TAP and QLB reduce pain scores compared with control, whereas only QLB reduces PONV compared with control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul S Alvi
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Jamal A Nasir
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad A Nizam
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad M Hamdani
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Nabeel A Bhangar
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Syed A Sibtain
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Ali S Lalani
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Ziauddin University, Clifton, Karachi, Sindh, 75000, Pakistan
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bijkerk V, Visser J, Jacobs LMC, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. Deep versus moderate neuromuscular blockade during total hip arthroplasty to improve postoperative quality of recovery and immune function: protocol for a randomised controlled study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e073537. [PMID: 37640469 PMCID: PMC10462972 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-073537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There is accumulating evidence that deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves intraoperative surgical conditions during laparoscopic surgery. Studies investigating the effects of deep NMB in open surgery are scarce. In theory, by limiting surgical damage through deeper muscle relaxation, postoperative inflammation and concomitant immune suppression can be reduced. Therefore, this study will investigate the effects of deep NMB during total hip arthroplasty, which demands a relatively large exposure of the hip joint through and in between muscles. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This study is a monocentre blinded randomised controlled trial in 100 patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia. Patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion to an intervention group of intraoperative deep NMB (a post-tetanic count of 1-2) or a control group receiving moderate NMB (a train-of-four count of 1-2). NMB will be achieved by continuous or bolus administration of rocuronium, respectively. The primary endpoint is the quality of recovery at postoperative day 1 measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 Questionnaire, analysed by Analysis of Variance. The secondary endpoint is postoperative innate immune function, measured by ex vivo production capacity of tumour necrosis factor and interleukin-1β on endotoxin stimulation of whole blood. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for this study was granted by the Medical Ethics Committee 'METC Oost-Nederland' (reference number 2022-15754). Informed consent will be obtained prior to study participation. Study results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05562999) and EudraCT Registry (2022-002451-19).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veerle Bijkerk
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jetze Visser
- Department of Orthopedics, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Krijtenburg P, Bruintjes MHD, Fütterer JJ, van de Steeg G, d'Ancona F, Scheffer GJ, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. MRI measurement of the effects of moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade on the abdominal working space during laparoscopic surgery, a clinical study. BMC Anesthesiol 2023; 23:238. [PMID: 37452279 PMCID: PMC10347813 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02201-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicting data exist regarding the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on abdominal dimensions during laparoscopic procedures. We performed a clinical study to establish the influence of moderate and deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) on the abdominal working space, measured by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy with standard pressure (12 mmHg) pneumoperitoneum under sevoflurane anaesthesia. METHODS Ten patients were intraoperatively scanned three times in the lateral decubitus position, with pneumoperitoneum maintained by a mobile insufflator. The first scan without NMB (T1) was followed by scans with moderate (T2) and deep NMB (T3). The skin-sacral promontory (S-SP) distance was measured, and 3D pneumoperitoneum volumes were reconstructed. RESULTS The mean difference in the S-SP distance was -0.32 cm between T2 and T3 (95% CI -1.06 - 0.42 cm; p = 0.344) and + 2.1 cm between T1 and T2 (95% CI 0.81 - 3.39 cm; p = 0.006). The mean differences in pneumoperitoneum volume were 166 mL between T2 and T3 (95% CI, 5 - 327 mL; p = 0.044) and 108 mL between T1 and T2 (95% CI, -273 - 488 mL; p = 0.525). The pneumoperitoneum volume showed high inter-individual variability and no increase in three patients with a high volume at T1. CONCLUSIONS During laparoscopic surgery in the lateral decubitus position with standard pressure under sevoflurane anaesthesia, deep NMB did not increase the S-SP distance compared to moderate NMB. Moderate NMB increased the S-SP distance by a mean of 2.1 cm (15.2%) compared with no NMB. The mean pneumoperitoneum volume increased slightly from moderate to deep NMB, with high inter-individual variability. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03287388.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Krijtenburg
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Route 717, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frank d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gert Jan Scheffer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Route 717, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan Keijzer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboudumc, Route 717, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, 6525 GA, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Reijnders-Boerboom GT, Albers KI, Jacobs LM, van Helden E, Rosman C, Díaz-Cambronero O, Mazzinari G, Scheffer GJ, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. Low intra-abdominal pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2023; 109:1400-1411. [PMID: 37026807 PMCID: PMC10389627 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000000289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidelines do not provide clear recommendations with regard to the use of low intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis is to assess the influence of low versus standard IAP during laparoscopic surgery on the key-outcomes in perioperative medicine as defined by the StEP-COMPAC consensus group. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials comparing low IAP (<10 mmHg) with standard IAP (10 mmHg or higher) during laparoscopic surgery without time, language, or blinding restrictions. According to the PRISMA guidelines, two review authors independently identified trials and extracted data. Risk ratio (RR), and mean difference (MD), with 95% CIs were calculated using random-effects models with RevMan5. Main outcomes were based on StEP-COMPAC recommendations, and included postoperative complications, postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) scores, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS Eighty-five studies in a wide range of laparoscopic procedures (7349 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The available evidence indicates that the use of low IAP (<10 mmHg) leads to a lower incidence of mild (Clavien-Dindo grade 1-2) postoperative complications (RR=0.68, 95% CI: 0.53-0.86), lower pain scores (MD=-0.68, 95% CI: -0.82 to 0.54) and PONV incidence (RR=0.67, 95% CI: 0.51-0.88), and a reduced length of hospital stay (MD=-0.29, 95% CI: -0.46 to 0.11). Low IAP did not increase the risk of intraoperative complications (RR=1.15, 95% CI: 0.77-1.73). CONCLUSIONS Given the established safety and the reduced incidence of mild postoperative complications, lower pain scores, reduced incidence of PONV, and shorter length of stay, the available evidence supports a moderate to strong recommendation (1a level of evidence) in favor of low IAP during laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim I. Albers
- Departments of Anesthesiology
- Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Oscar Díaz-Cambronero
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fé University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Guido Mazzinari
- Department of Anesthesiology, La Fé University and Polytechnic Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Landman TRJ, Schoon Y, Warlé MC, Meijer FJA, Leeuw FED, Thijssen DHJ. The effect of repeated remote ischemic postconditioning after an ischemic stroke (REPOST): A randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke 2023; 18:296-303. [PMID: 35593677 PMCID: PMC9941800 DOI: 10.1177/17474930221104710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS A potential strategy to treat ischemic stroke may be the application of repeated remote ischemic postconditioning (rIPostC). This consists of several cycles of brief periods of limb ischemia followed by reperfusion, which can be applied by inflating a simple blood pressure cuff and subsequently could result in neuroprotection after stroke. METHODS Adult patients admitted with an ischemic stroke in the past 24 h were randomized 1:1 to repeated rIPostC or sham-conditioning. Repeated rIPostC was performed by inflating a blood pressure cuff around the upper arm (4 × 5 min at 200 mm Hg), which was repeated twice daily during hospitalization with a maximum of 4 days. Primary outcome was infarct size after 4 days or at discharge. Secondary outcomes included the modified Rankin Scale (mRS)-score after 12 weeks and the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) at discharge. RESULTS The trial was preliminarily stopped after we included 88 of the scheduled 180 patients (average age: 70 years, 68% male) into rIPostC (n = 40) and sham-conditioning (n = 48). Median infarct volume was 2.19 mL in rIPostC group and 5.90 mL in sham-conditioning, which was not significantly different between the two groups (median difference: 3.71; 95% CI: -0.56 to 6.09; p = 0.31). We found no significant shift in the mRS score distribution between groups. The adjusted common odds ratio was 2.09 (95% CI: 0.88-5.00). We found no significant difference in the NIHSS score between groups (median difference: 1.00; 95% CI: -0.99 to 1.40; p = 0.51). CONCLUSION This study found no significant improvement in infarct size or clinical outcome in patients with an acute ischemic stroke who were treated with repeated remote ischemic postconditioning. However, due to a lower-than-expected inclusion rate, no definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of rIPostC can be drawn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs RJ Landman
- Department of Physiology, Radboud
Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands,Thijs RJ Landman, Department of Physiology,
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert
Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
| | - Yvonne Schoon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine,
Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen,
The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud
University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frederick JA Meijer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud
University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank-Erik De Leeuw
- Donders Center for Medical
Neuroscience, Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen,
The Netherlands
| | - Dick HJ Thijssen
- Department of Physiology, Radboud
Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The
Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kerstens TP, Landman TRJ, Schoon Y, Meijer FJA, Warlé MC, de Leeuw FE, Thijssen DHJ. The Effect of Remote Ischemic Postconditioning on Quality of Life and Clinical Events after an Ischemic Stroke. Curr Neurovasc Res 2023; 20:472-479. [PMID: 38099530 DOI: 10.2174/0115672026275008231120063757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Repeated remote ischemic postconditioning (rIPostC) may be an easily applicable treatment following ischemic stroke to improve quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes. rIPostC consists of repeated, brief periods of limb ischemia (through inflation of a blood pressure cuff), followed by reperfusion. This study investigated the 1-year follow-up of rIPostC on QoL and clinical events. METHODS As part of a randomized controlled trial, adult patients with an ischemic stroke within 24 hours after onset of symptoms were randomized to repeated rIPostC or sham-conditioning. rIPostC was applied twice daily during hospitalization (maximum of 4 days). QoL and patientreported outcome measures (PROMs) were assessed at 12-week and 1-year follow-ups. Additionally, we explored the effect of repeated rIPostC on clinical events (recurrent cerebrovascular events, hospitalization, and mortality). RESULTS The trial was preliminarily stopped due to limitations in recruitment after the inclusion of 88 patients (rIPostC: 40; sham-conditioning: 48) (70 years, 68% male). Questionnaires were returned by 69 (78%) and 63 (72%) participants after 12 weeks and 1 year, respectively. The median difference of the stroke-specific QoL between rIPostC and sham-conditioning was 0.05 (p =0.986) and -0.16 (p =0.654) after 12 weeks and 1-year, respectively. No significant effect of rIPostC on the different domains of PROMs was detected. We observed no between-group differences in recurrent cerebrovascular events, hospitalization, or all-cause mortality (Hazard Ratios p >0.05). CONCLUSION In this exploratory analysis, we observed no significant difference between repeated rIPostC and usual care on QoL and clinical outcomes at 12 weeks and 1 year in patients with an ischemic stroke. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR6880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs P Kerstens
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
| | - Thijs R J Landman
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
| | - Yvonne Schoon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health sciences, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
| | - Frederick J A Meijer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
| | - Frank-Erik de Leeuw
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Donders Center for Medical Neuroscience PO Box 9101, 6500HB Nijmegen
| | - Dick H J Thijssen
- Department of Medical BioSciences, Radboud University Nijmegan Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6525GA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Roozen EA, Lomme RMLM, Calon NUB, Warlé MC, Van Goor H. Validity of a novel ex vivo porcine liver perfusion model for studying haemostatic products. Lab Anim 2022:236772221138398. [DOI: 10.1177/00236772221138398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction We developed a novel normothermic ex vivo porcine liver perfusion model with whole blood in order to have alternatives for animal experiments in the research and development of new local haemostatic agents. This study aims to assess the construct and content validity of this model. Methods In this study we performed two ex vivo experiments using nine livers and one in vivo experiment using six female Norsvin Topigs pigs: (1) ex vivo liver perfusion for establishing physiological blood parameters of the perfused liver and controlled heparinization, (2) ex vivo liver perfusion with a surgical injury and (3) a surgical liver injury in anaesthetized pigs with and without heparin. Results Ex vivo coagulation parameters were comparable to in vivo with heparin. Blood gas values and metabolic parameters were comparable between ex vivo and in vivo with heparin, but significantly different compared with in vivo baseline, with the exception of (partial pressure of oxygen (PO2). Activated clotting time (ACT) values significantly differed depending on the heparin doses. The coagulation parameters fibrinogen, activated partial thromboplastin time, prothrombin time and ACT were rather constant during the 4 h ex vivo perfusion. Haemostatic efficacy of commercially available products was comparable between in vivo with heparin and the ex vivo liver perfusion experiment. Conclusion This novel ex vivo liver perfusion model demonstrates good construct and content validity for at least 4 h of perfusion. The model is an easily accessible, table-top, tunable and effective alternative for the in vivo testing of (new) haemostatic products on their haemostatic properties. Validité d'un nouveau modèle de perfusion hépatique porcin ex-vivo pour l'étude des produits hémostatiques Résumé
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Harry Van Goor
- Radboud University Medical Centre, Department of Surgery, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kranendonk J, Willems LH, Vijver-Coppen RVD, Coenen M, Adang E, Donders R, Zeebregts CJ, Deneer V, Reijnen M, Kramers C, Warlé MC. CYP2C19 genotype-guided antithrombotic treatment versus conventional clopidogrel therapy in peripheral arterial disease: study design of a randomized controlled trial (GENPAD). Am Heart J 2022; 254:141-148. [PMID: 35988587 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2022] [Revised: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clopidogrel is recommended in international guidelines to prevent arterial thrombotic events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Clopidogrel itself is inactive and metabolism is dependent on the CYP2C19 enzyme. About 30% of Caucasian PAD patients receiving clopidogrel carry 1 or 2 CYP2C19 loss-of-function allele(s) and do not or to a limited extent convert the prodrug into its active metabolite. As a result, platelet inhibition may be inadequate which could lead to an increased risk of adverse clinical events related to arterial thrombosis. A CYP2C19 genotype-guided antithrombotic treatment might be beneficial for PAD patients. METHODS GENPAD is a multicenter randomized controlled trial involving 2,276 PAD patients with an indication for clopidogrel monotherapy. Patients with a separate indication for dual antiplatelet therapy or stronger antithrombotic therapy are not eligible for study participation. Patients randomized to the control group will receive clopidogrel 75 mg once daily without pharmacogenetic guidance. Patients randomized to the intervention group will be tested for carriage of CYP2C19 *2 and *3 loss-of-function alleles, followed by a genotype-guided antithrombotic treatment with either clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for normal metabolizers, clopidogrel 150 mg once daily for intermediate metabolizers, or acetylsalicylic acid 80 mg once daily plus rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily for poor metabolizers. The primary outcome is a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, cardiovascular death, acute or chronic limb ischemia, peripheral vascular interventions, or death. The secondary outcomes are the individual elements of the primary composite outcome and clinically relevant bleeding complications. CONCLUSION The aim of the GENPAD study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of a genotype-guided antithrombotic treatment strategy compared to conventional clopidogrel treatment in PAD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Kranendonk
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - L H Willems
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Coenen
- Department of Human Genetics, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - E Adang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University Of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Vhm Deneer
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Division of Laboratories, Pharmacy and Biomedical Genetics University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht university, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Mmpj Reijnen
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Multimodality Medical Imaging Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - C Kramers
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
de Graaff MR, Hogenbirk RNM, Janssen YF, Elfrink AKE, Liem RSL, Nienhuijs SW, de Vries JPPM, Elshof JW, Verdaasdonk E, Melenhorst J, van Westreenen HL, Besselink MGH, Ruurda JP, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Klaase JM, den Dulk M, van Heijl M, Hegeman JH, Braun J, Voeten DM, Würdemann FS, Warps ALK, Alberga AJ, Suurmeijer JA, Akpinar EO, Wolfhagen N, van den Boom AL, Bolster-van Eenennaam MJ, van Duijvendijk P, Heineman DJ, Wouters MWJM, Kruijff S, Koningswoud-Terhoeve CL, Belt E, van der Hoeven JAB, Marres GMH, Tozzi F, von Meyenfeldt EM, Coebergh RRJ, van den Braak, Huisman S, Rijken AM, Balm R, Daams F, Dickhoff C, Eshuis WJ, Gisbertz SS, Zandbergen HR, Hartemink KJ, Keessen SA, Kok NFM, Kuhlmann KFD, van Sandick JW, Veenhof AA, Wals A, van Diepen MS, Schoonderwoerd L, Stevens CT, Susa D, Bendermacher BLW, Olofsen N, van Himbeeck M, de Hingh IHJT, Janssen HJB, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Ramaekers M, Stacie R, Talsma AK, Tissink MW, Dolmans D, Berendsen R, Heisterkamp J, Jansen WA, de Kort-van Oudheusden M, Matthijsen RM, Grünhagen DJ, Lagarde SM, Maat APWM, van der Sluis PC, Waalboer RB, Brehm V, van Brussel JP, Morak M, Ponfoort ED, Sybrandy JEM, Klemm PL, Lastdrager W, Palamba HW, van Aalten SM, Tseng LNL, van der Bogt KEA, de Jong WJ, Oosterhuis JWA, Tummers Q, van der Wilden GM, Ooms S, Pasveer EH, Veger HTC, Molegraafb MJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Patijn GA, van der Veldt MEV, Boersma D, van Haelst STW, van Koeverden ID, Rots ML, Bonsing BA, Michiels N, Bijlstra OD, Braun J, Broekhuis D, Brummelaar HW, Hartgrink HH, Metselaar A, Mieog JSD, Schipper IB, de Steur WO, Fioole B, Terlouw EC, Biesmans C, Bosmans JWAM, Bouwense SAW, Clermonts SHEM, Coolsen MME, Mees BME, Schurink GWH, Duijff JW, van Gent T, de Nes LCF, Toonen D, Beverwijk MJ, van den Hoed E, Keizers B, Kelder W, Keller BPJA, Pultrum BB, van Rosum E, Wijma AG, van den Broek F, Leclercq WKG, Loos MJA, Sijmons JML, Vaes RHD, Vancoillie PJ, Consten ECJ, Jongen JMJ, Verheijen PM, van Weel V, Arts CHP, Jonker J, Murrmann-Boonstra G, Pierie JPEN, Swart J, van Duyn EB, Geelkerken RH, de Groot R, Moekotte NL, Stam A, Voshaar A, van Acker GJD, Bulder RMA, Swank DJ, Pereboom ITA, Hoffmann WH, Orsini M, Blok JJ, Lardenoije JHP, Reijne MMPJ, van Schaik P, Smeets L, van Sterkenburg SMM, Harlaar NJ, Mekke S, Verhaakt T, Cancrinus E, van Lammeren GW, Molenaar IQ, van Santvoort HC, Vos AWF, Schouten- van der Velden AP, Woensdregt K, Mooy-Vermaat SP, Scharn DM, Marsman HA, Rassam F, Halfwerk FR, Andela AJ, Buis CI, van Dam GM, ten Duis K, van Etten B, Lases L, Meerdink M, de Meijer VE, Pranger B, Ruiter S, Rurenga M, Wiersma A, Wijsmuller AR, Albers KI, van den Boezem PB, Klarenbeek B, van der Kolk BM, van Laarhoven CJHM, Matthée E, Peters N, Rosman C, Schroen AMA, Stommel MWJ, Verhagen AFTM, van der Vijver R, Warlé MC, de Wilt JHW, van den Berg JW, Bloemert T, de Borst GJ, van Hattum EH, Hazenberg CEVB, van Herwaarden JA, van Hillegerberg R, Kroese TE, Petri BJ, Toorop RJ, Aarts F, Janssen RJL, Janssen-Maessen SHP, Kool M, Verberght H, Moes DE, Smit JW, Wiersema AM, Vierhout BP, de Vos B, den Boer FC, Dekker NAM, Botman JMJ, van Det MJ, Folbert EC, de Jong E, Koenen JC, Kouwenhoven EA, Masselink I, Navis LH, Belgers HJ, Sosef MN, Stoot JHMB. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on surgical care in the Netherlands. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1282-1292. [PMID: 36811624 PMCID: PMC10364688 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 pandemic caused disruption of regular healthcare leading to reduced hospital attendances, repurposing of surgical facilities, and cancellation of cancer screening programmes. This study aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 on surgical care in the Netherlands. METHODS A nationwide study was conducted in collaboration with the Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing. Eight surgical audits were expanded with items regarding alterations in scheduling and treatment plans. Data on procedures performed in 2020 were compared with those from a historical cohort (2018-2019). Endpoints included total numbers of procedures performed and altered treatment plans. Secondary endpoints included complication, readmission, and mortality rates. RESULTS Some 12 154 procedures were performed in participating hospitals in 2020, representing a decrease of 13.6 per cent compared with 2018-2019. The largest reduction (29.2 per cent) was for non-cancer procedures during the first COVID-19 wave. Surgical treatment was postponed for 9.6 per cent of patients. Alterations in surgical treatment plans were observed in 1.7 per cent. Time from diagnosis to surgery decreased (to 28 days in 2020, from 34 days in 2019 and 36 days in 2018; P < 0.001). For cancer-related procedures, duration of hospital stay decreased (5 versus 6 days; P < 0.001). Audit-specific complications, readmission, and mortality rates were unchanged, but ICU admissions decreased (16.5 versus 16.8 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION The reduction in the number of surgical operations was greatest for those without cancer. Where surgery was undertaken, it appeared to be delivered safely, with similar complication and mortality rates, fewer admissions to ICU, and a shorter hospital stay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle R de Graaff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.,Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Gelre Ziekenhuizen, Apeldoorn, the Netherlands
| | - Rianne N M Hogenbirk
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Yester F Janssen
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arthur K E Elfrink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ronald S L Liem
- Department of Surgery, Dutch Obesity Clinic, Gouda, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, the Netherlands
| | - Simon W Nienhuijs
- Department of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Willem Elshof
- Department of Surgery, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo, the Netherlands
| | - Emiel Verdaasdonk
- Department of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's Hertogenbosch, the Netherlands
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Marc G H Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jelle P Ruurda
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Joost M Klaase
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Mark van Heijl
- Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H Hegeman
- Department of Surgery, Ziekenhuisgroep Twente Almelo-Hengelo, Almelo, Hengelo, the Netherlands
| | - Jerry Braun
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Daan M Voeten
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Franka S Würdemann
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anne-Loes K Warps
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Anna J Alberga
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Annelie Suurmeijer
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.,Cancer Centre Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erman O Akpinar
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Wolfhagen
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - David J Heineman
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michel W J M Wouters
- Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Scientific Bureau, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, the Netherlands.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Schelto Kruijff
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Nijsink H, Overduin CG, Willems LH, Warlé MC, Fütterer JJ. Current State of MRI-Guided Endovascular Arterial Interventions: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 56:1322-1342. [PMID: 35420239 PMCID: PMC9790618 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2022] [Revised: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND MRI guidance of arterial endovascular interventions could be beneficial as it does not require radiation exposure, allows intrinsic blood-tissue contrast, and enables three-dimensional and functional imaging, however, clinical applications are still limited. PURPOSE To review the current state of MRI-guided arterial endovascular interventions and to identify the most commonly reported challenges. STUDY TYPE Systematic review. POPULATION Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library were systematically searched to find relevant articles. The search strategy combined synonyms for vascular pathology, endovascular therapy, and real-time MRI guidance. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE No field strength or sequence restrictions were applied. ASSESSMENT Two reviewers independently identified and reviewed the original articles and extracted relevant data. STATISTICAL TESTS Results of the included original articles are reported. RESULTS A total of 24,809 studies were identified for screening. Eighty-eight studies were assessed for eligibility, after which data were extracted from 43 articles (6 phantom, 33 animal, and 4 human studies). Reported technical success rates for animal and human studies ranged between 42% to 100%, and the average complication rate was 5.8% (animal studies) and 8.8% (human studies). Main identified challenges were related to spatial and temporal resolution as well as safety, design, and scarcity of current MRI-compatible endovascular devices. DATA CONCLUSION MRI guidance of endovascular arterial interventions seems feasible, however, included articles included mostly small single-center case series. Several hurdles remain to be overcome before larger trials can be undertaken. Main areas of research should focus on adequate imaging protocols with integrated tracking of dedicated endovascular devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Nijsink
- Department of Medical ImagingRadboudumcNijmegenNetherlands
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Willems LH, Thijssen DHJ, Groh LA, Kooijman NI, Ten Cate H, Spronk HMH, Donders ART, van der Vijver-Coppen RJ, van Hoek F, Nagy M, Reijnen MMPJ, Warlé MC. Dual pathway inhibition as compared to acetylsalicylic acid monotherapy in relation to endothelial function in peripheral artery disease, a phase IV clinical trial. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:979819. [PMID: 36277757 PMCID: PMC9583941 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.979819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Dual pathway inhibition (DPI) by combining acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) with low-dose rivaroxaban has been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) when compared to ASA monotherapy. A potential explanation is that inhibition of factor Xa improves endothelial function through crosstalk between coagulation and inflammatory pathways, subsequently attenuating the occurrence of cardiovascular events. We hypothesize that the addition of rivaroxaban to ASA in PAD patients leads to improved endothelial function. Design An investigator-initiated, multicentre trial investigating the effect of DPI on endothelial function. Methods Patients, diagnosed with PAD, were enrolled in two cohorts: cohort A (Rutherford I-III) and cohort B (Rutherford IV-VI). Participants received ASA monotherapy for a 4-weeks run-in period, followed by 12 weeks of DPI. Macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction were studied by measuring carotid artery reactivity upon sympathetic stimulus and by measuring plasma endothelin-1 concentrations, respectively. All measurements were performed during the use of ASA (baseline) and after 12 weeks of DPI. Results 159 PAD patients (111 cohort A, 48 cohort B) were enrolled. Twenty patients discontinued study drugs early. Carotid artery constriction upon sympathetic stimulation at baseline (ASA) and after 12 weeks of DPI was similar in the total group, 22.0 vs. 22.7% (p = 1.000), and in the subgroups (Cohort A 22.6 vs. 23.7%, p = 1.000; cohort B 20.5 vs. 20.5%, p = 1.000), respectively. The mean concentration of plasma endothelin-1 at baseline and after 12 weeks of DPI did not differ, 1.70 ± 0.5 vs. 1.66 ± 0.64 pmol/L (p = 0.440) in the total group, 1.69 ± 0.59 vs. 1.62 ± 0.55 pmol/L in cohort A (p = 0.202), and 1.73 ± 0.53 vs. 1.77 ± 0.82 pmol/L in cohort B (p = 0.682), respectively. Conclusion Macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction, as reflected by carotid artery reactivity and plasma endothelin-1 concentrations, are not influenced in PAD patients by addition of low-dose rivaroxaban to ASA monotherapy for 12 weeks. Trial registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04218656.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes H. Willems
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands,*Correspondence: Loes H. Willems
| | - Dick H. J. Thijssen
- Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands,Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Laszlo A. Groh
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Nina I. Kooijman
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, Netherlands,Center for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - Henri M. H. Spronk
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - A. Rogier T. Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank van Hoek
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Magdolna Nagy
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC) and Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM) School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Michel M. P. J. Reijnen
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands,Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Willems LH, Maas DPMSM, Kramers K, Reijnen MMPJ, Riksen NP, Ten Cate H, van der Vijver-Coppen RJ, de Borst GJ, Mees BME, Zeebregts CJ, Hannink G, Warlé MC. Correction to: Antithrombotic Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Drugs 2022; 82:1435. [PMID: 36070076 PMCID: PMC9512859 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01776-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Loes H Willems
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101 (Intern 618), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Dominique P M S M Maas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Kramers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michel M P J Reijnen
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Niels P Riksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center and CARIM School for Cardiovascular diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Center for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Gert J de Borst
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Barend M E Mees
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101 (Intern 618), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Willems LH, Maas DPMSM, Kramers K, Reijnen MMPJ, Riksen NP, Ten Cate H, van der Vijver-Coppen RJ, de Borst GJ, Mees BMW, Zeebregts CJ, Hannink G, Warlé MC. Antithrombotic Therapy for Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Drugs 2022; 82:1287-1302. [PMID: 35997941 PMCID: PMC9499921 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-022-01756-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background High-quality evidence from trials directly comparing single antiplatelet therapies in symptomatic peripheral arterial disease (PAD) to dual antiplatelet therapies or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) plus low-dose rivaroxaban is lacking. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis on the effectiveness of all antithrombotic regimens studied in PAD. Methods A systematic search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials. The primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleedings. Secondary endpoints were major adverse limb events (MALE) and acute limb ischaemia (ALI). For each outcome, a frequentist network meta-analysis was used to compare relative risks (RRs) between medication and ASA. ASA was the universal comparator since a majority of studies used ASA as in the reference group. Results Twenty-four randomized controlled trials were identified including 48,759 patients. With regard to reducing MACE, clopidogrel [RR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.93], ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65–0.97), ASA plus ticagrelor (RR 0.79, 95% CI 0.64–0.97), and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.76–0.93) were more effective than ASA, and equally effective to one another. As compared to ASA, major bleedings occurred more frequently with vitamin K antagonists, rivaroxaban, ASA plus vitamin K antagonists, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban. All regimens were similar to ASA concerning MALE, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing ALI (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55–0.80). Subgroup analysis in patients undergoing peripheral revascularization revealed that ≥ 3 months after intervention, evidence of benefit regarding clopidogrel, ticagrelor, and ASA plus ticagrelor was lacking, while ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban was more effective in preventing MACE (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97) and MALE (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.81–0.97) compared to ASA. ASA plus clopidogrel was not superior to ASA in preventing MACE ≥ 3 months after revascularization. Evidence regarding antithrombotic treatment strategies within 3 months after a peripheral intervention was lacking. Conclusion Clopidogrel, ticagrelor, ASA plus ticagrelor, and ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban are superior to ASA monotherapy and equally effective to one another in preventing MACE in PAD. Of these four therapies, only ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban provides a higher risk of major bleedings. More than 3 months after peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban is superior in preventing MACE and MALE compared to ASA but again at the cost of a higher risk of bleeding, while other treatment regimens show non-superiority. Based on the current evidence, clopidogrel may be considered the antithrombotic therapy of choice for most PAD patients, while in patients who underwent a peripheral vascular intervention, ASA plus low-dose rivaroxaban could be considered for the long-term (> 3 months) prevention of MACE and MALE. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40265-022-01756-6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes H Willems
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101 (Intern 618), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Dominique P M S M Maas
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kees Kramers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michel M P J Reijnen
- Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, and Multi-Modality Medical Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Niels P Riksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Departments of Internal Medicine and Biochemistry, Maastricht University Medical Center and CARIM School for Cardiovascular diseases, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Center for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Gert J de Borst
- Department of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Barend M W Mees
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Clark J Zeebregts
- Department of Surgery (Division of Vascular Surgery), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Postbus 9101 (Intern 618), 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
van Helden EV, van Uitert A, Albers KI, Steegers MAH, Timmers HJLM, d'Ancona FCH, van der Wal SEI, Scheffer GJ, Keijzer C, Warlé MC, Langenhuijsen JF. Chronic postsurgical pain after minimally invasive adrenalectomy: prevalence and impact on quality of life. BMC Anesthesiol 2022; 22:153. [PMID: 35590236 PMCID: PMC9118616 DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01696-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive adrenalectomy is the standard of care for small adrenal tumours. Both the transperitoneal lateral approach and posterior retroperitoneal approach are widely used and have been proven to be safe and effective. However, the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain has not been specifically investigated in previous studies. The primary goal of this study was to identify the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain after minimally invasive adrenalectomy. METHODS A cross-sectional study was performed among all consecutive patients who had undergone minimally invasive adrenalectomy in a single university medical centre. The primary outcome was the prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain. Secondary outcomes were the prevalence of localized hypoesthesia, risk factors for the development of chronic postsurgical pain, and the Health-Related Quality of Life. Three questionnaires were used to measure the prevalence and severity of chronic postsurgical pain, hypoesthesia, and Health-Related Quality of Life. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for development of chronic postsurgical pain. RESULTS Six hundred two patients underwent minimally invasive adrenalectomy between January 2007 and September 2019, of whom 328 signed informed consent. The prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain was 14.9%. In the group of patients with chronic postsurgical pain, 33% reported hypoesthesia as well. Young age was a significant predictor for developing chronic postsurgical pain. The prevalence of localized hypoesthesia was 15.2%. In patients with chronic postsurgical pain, Health-Related Quality of Life was significantly lower, compared to patients without pain. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of chronic postsurgical pain following minimally invasive adrenalectomy is considerable. Furthermore, the presence of chronic postsurgical pain was correlated with a significant and clinically relevant lower Health-Related Quality of Life. These findings should be included in the preoperative counselling of the patient. In the absence of evidence for effective treatment in established chronic pain, prevention should be the key strategy and topic of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esmee V van Helden
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Allon van Uitert
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kim I Albers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Monique A H Steegers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081, HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henri J L M Timmers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank C H d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Selina E I van der Wal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gert Jan Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan Keijzer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Johan F Langenhuijsen
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nijsink H, Overduin CG, Brand P, De Jong SF, Borm PJA, Warlé MC, Fütterer JJ. Optimised passive marker device visibility and automatic marker detection for 3-T MRI-guided endovascular interventions: a pulsatile flow phantom study. Eur Radiol Exp 2022; 6:11. [PMID: 35199259 PMCID: PMC8866618 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-022-00262-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Passive paramagnetic markers on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-compatible endovascular devices induce susceptibility artifacts, enabling MRI-visibility and real-time MRI-guidance. Optimised visibility is crucial for automatic detection and device tracking but depends on MRI technical parameters and marker characteristics. We assessed marker visibility and automatic detection robustness for varying MRI parameters and marker characteristics in a pulsatile flow phantom. METHODS Guidewires with varying iron(II,III) oxide nanoparticle (IONP) concentration markers were imaged using gradient-echo (GRE) and balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequences at 3 T. Furthermore, echo time (TE), slice thickness (ST) and phase encoding direction (PED) were varied. Artifact width was measured and contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated. Marker visibility and image quality were scored by two MRI interventional radiologists. Additionally, a deep learning model for automatic marker detection was trained and the effects of the parameters on detection performance were evaluated. Two-tailed Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used (significance level, p < 0.05). RESULTS Medan artifact width (IQR) was larger in bSSFP compared to GRE images (12.7 mm (11.0-15.2) versus 8.4 mm (6.5-11.0)) (p < 0.001) and showed a positive relation with TE and IONP concentration. Switching PED and doubling ST had limited effect on artifact width. Image quality assessment scores were higher for GRE compared to bSSFP images. The deep learning model automatically detected the markers. However, the model performance was reduced after adjusting PED, TE, and IONP concentration. CONCLUSION Marker visibility was sufficient and a large range of artifact sizes was generated by adjusting TE and IONP concentration. Deep learning-based marker detection was feasible but performance decreased for altered MR parameters. These factors should be considered to optimise device visibility and ensure reliable automatic marker detectability in MRI-guided endovascular interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Han Nijsink
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, Nijmegen, GA, The Netherlands.
| | - Christiaan G Overduin
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, Nijmegen, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Patrick Brand
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, Nijmegen, GA, The Netherlands
| | - Sytse F De Jong
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Jurgen J Fütterer
- Department of Medical Imaging, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, Nijmegen, GA, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Willems LH, Nagy M, Ten Cate H, Spronk HMH, Groh LA, Leentjens J, Janssen NAF, Netea MG, Thijssen DHJ, Hannink G, van Petersen AS, Warlé MC. Sustained inflammation, coagulation activation and elevated endothelin-1 levels without macrovascular dysfunction at 3 months after COVID-19. Thromb Res 2021; 209:106-114. [PMID: 34922160 PMCID: PMC8642246 DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Revised: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Endothelial damage and thrombosis caused by COVID-19 may imperil cardiovascular health. More than a year since the WHO declared COVID-19 pandemic, information on its effects beyond the acute phase is lacking. We investigate endothelial dysfunction, coagulation and inflammation, 3 months post-COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS A cohort study was conducted including 203 patients with prior COVID-19. Macrovascular dysfunction was assessed by measuring the carotid artery diameter in response to hand immersion in ice-water. A historic cohort of 312 subjects served as controls. Propensity score matching corrected for baseline differences. Plasma concentrations of endothelin-1 were measured in patients post-COVID-19, during the acute phase, and in matched controls. Coagulation enzyme:inhibitor complexes and inflammatory cytokines were studied. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of macrovascular dysfunction did not differ between the COVID-19 (18.6%) and the historic cohort (22.5%, RD -4%, 95%CI: -15-7, p = 0.49). Endothelin-1 levels were significantly higher in acute COVID-19 (1.67 ± 0.64 pg/mL) as compared to controls (1.24 ± 0.37, p < 0.001), and further elevated 3 months post-COVID-19 (2.74 ± 1.81, p < 0.001). Thrombin:antithrombin(AT) was high in 48.3%. Markers of contact activation were increased in 16-30%. FVIIa:AT (35%) and Von Willebrand Factor:antigen (80.8%) were elevated. Inflammatory cytokine levels were high in a majority: interleukin(IL)-18 (73.9%), IL-6 (47.7%), and IL-1ra (48.9%). At 3 months after acute COVID-19 there was no indication of macrovascular dysfunction; there was evidence, however, of sustained endothelial cell involvement, coagulation activity and inflammation. Our data highlight the importance of further studies on SARS-CoV-2 related vascular inflammation and thrombosis, as well as longer follow-up in recovered patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L H Willems
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M Nagy
- Departments of Internal medicine and Biochemistry, MUMC and CARIM School for Cardiovascular diseases, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - H Ten Cate
- Departments of Internal medicine and Biochemistry, MUMC and CARIM School for Cardiovascular diseases, Maastricht, the Netherlands; Center for Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Gutenberg University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
| | - H M H Spronk
- Departments of Internal medicine and Biochemistry, MUMC and CARIM School for Cardiovascular diseases, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - L A Groh
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - J Leentjens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - N A F Janssen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M G Netea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - D H J Thijssen
- Department of Physiology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands/Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
| | - G Hannink
- Department of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - A S van Petersen
- Department of Surgery, Bernhoven Hospital, Uden, the Netherlands
| | - M C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Reijnders-Boerboom GTJA, van Helden EV, Minnee RC, Albers KI, Bruintjes MHD, Dahan A, Martini CH, d'Ancona FCH, Scheffer GJ, Keijzer C, Warlé MC. Deep neuromuscular block reduces the incidence of intra-operative complications during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials. Perioper Med (Lond) 2021; 10:56. [PMID: 34879862 PMCID: PMC8656013 DOI: 10.1186/s13741-021-00224-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Study objective To assess whether different intensities of intra-abdominal pressure and deep neuromuscular blockade influence the risk of intra-operative surgical complications during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Design A pooled analysis of ten previously performed prospective randomized controlled trials. Setting Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy performed in four academic hospitals in the Netherlands: Radboudumc, Leiden UMC, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, and Amsterdam UMC. Patients Five hundred fifty-six patients undergoing a transperitoneal, fully laparoscopic donor nephrectomy enrolled in ten prospective, randomized controlled trials conducted in the Netherlands from 2001 to 2017. Interventions Moderate (tetanic count of four > 1) versus deep (post-tetanic count 1–5) neuromuscular blockade and standard (≥10 mmHg) versus low (<10 mmHg) intra-abdominal pressure. Measurements The primary endpoint is the number of intra-operative surgical complications defined as any deviation from the ideal intra-operative course occurring between skin incision and closure with five severity grades, according to ClassIntra. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of intra- and postoperative complications. Main results In 53/556 (9.5%) patients, an intra-operative complication with ClassIntra grade ≥ 2 occurred. Multiple logistic regression analyses showed standard intra-abdominal pressure (OR 0.318, 95% CI 0.118–0.862; p = 0.024) as a predictor of less intra-operative complications and moderate neuromuscular blockade (OR 3.518, 95% CI 1.244–9.948; p = 0.018) as a predictor of more intra-operative complications. Postoperative complications occurred in 31/556 (6.8%), without significant predictors in multiple logistic regression analyses. Conclusions Our data indicate that the use of deep neuromuscular blockade could increase safety during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Future randomized clinical trials should be performed to confirm this and to pursue whether it also applies to other types of laparoscopic surgery. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov LEOPARD-2 (NCT02146417), LEOPARD-3 trial (NCT02602964), and RELAX-1 study (NCT02838134), Klop et al. (NTR 3096), Dols et al. 2014 (NTR1433).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabby T J A Reijnders-Boerboom
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Esmee V van Helden
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Robert C Minnee
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Doctor Molewaterplein 40, 3015, GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim I Albers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Moira H D Bruintjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Chris H Martini
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333, ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank C H d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Scheffer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan Keijzer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525, GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Willems LH, Nagy M, Ten Cate H, Spronk HMH, Jacobs LMC, Kranendonk J, van Leeuwen M, Meijer D, Middeldorp S, Groh LA, Warlé MC. ChAdOx1 vaccination, blood coagulation, and inflammation: No effect on coagulation but increased interleukin-6. Res Pract Thromb Haemost 2021; 5:e12630. [PMID: 34934894 PMCID: PMC8652129 DOI: 10.1002/rth2.12630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination is the leading approach in combatting the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination (ChAdOx1) has been linked to a higher frequency of rare thrombosis and thromboembolism. This study aimed to explore markers related to the blood coagulation system activation and inflammation, before and after ChAdOx1 vaccination. PATIENTS AND METHODS An observational cohort study including 40 health care workers. Whole blood samples were collected before, and either 1 or 2 days after vaccination. Activated coagulation factors in complex with their natural inhibitors were determined by custom ELISAs, including thrombin:antithrombin (T:AT), kallikrein:C1-esterase-inhibitor (PKa:C1Inh), factor(F)IXa:AT, FXa:AT, FXIaAT, FXIa:alpha-1-antitrypsin (α1AT), FXIa:C1inh, and FVIIa:AT. Plasma concentrations of interleukin (IL)-6 and IL-18 were quantified via ELISA. Analyses were performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS Levels of FVIIa:AT decreased with a median (IQR) of 707 (549-1028) pg/ml versus 598 (471-996) pg/ml, p = 0.01; and levels of IL-6 increased, 4.0 (1.9-6.8) pg/ml versus 6.9 (3.6-12.2) pg/ml, p = 0.02, after vaccination. No changes were observed in T:AT, PKa:C1Inh, FIXa:AT, FXa:AT, FXIaAT, FXIa:α1AT, FXIa:C1inh, and IL-18. CONCLUSION ChAdOx1 leads to an inflammatory response with increased levels of IL-6. We did not observe activation of the blood coagulation system 1-2 days following vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loes H. Willems
- Department of SurgeryRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Magdolna Nagy
- Departments of Internal Medicine and BiochemistryMUMC and CARIM School for Cardiovascular DiseasesMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Hugo Ten Cate
- Departments of Internal Medicine and BiochemistryMUMC and CARIM School for Cardiovascular DiseasesMaastrichtThe Netherlands
- Center for Thrombosis and HaemostasisGutenberg University Medical CenterMainzGermany
| | - Henri M. H. Spronk
- Departments of Internal Medicine and BiochemistryMUMC and CARIM School for Cardiovascular DiseasesMaastrichtThe Netherlands
| | - Lotte M. C. Jacobs
- Department of SurgeryRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Josephine Kranendonk
- Department of SurgeryRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Maaike van Leeuwen
- Department of SurgeryRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Danielle Meijer
- Department of Laboratory MedicineLaboratory of HematologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Saskia Middeldorp
- Department of Internal MedicineRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Laszlo A. Groh
- Department of SurgeryRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of SurgeryRadboud Institute of Health Sciences (RIHS)Radboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Roozen EA, Warlé MC, Lomme RMLM, Félix Lanao RP, van Goor H. New polyoxazoline loaded patches for hemostasis in experimental liver resection. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2021; 110:597-605. [PMID: 34536065 PMCID: PMC9290804 DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.34938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 08/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
A new cost‐effective NHS functionalized polyoxazoline (POx) loaded polymer with strong hemostatic properties has been developed. In this study, we investigate POx loaded hemostatic patches regarding hemostatic efficacy, local inflammatory reaction and wound‐healing, as compared to the non‐POx treated blanks and commercially available hemostatic products. Hundred and ten rats divided into 11 groups of 10 animals underwent partial liver lobe resection. Eight groups received experimental patches, two groups commercially available hemostatic patches (TachoSil® and Veriset™, positive controls), one group with gauzes (negative control). Each animal received twice a patch with a size 1.5 × 2.5 cm, on each partially resected lobe. Primary endpoint was time to hemostasis (TTH). The rats were sacrificed at different time points (1, 3, or 7 days) to measure local inflammatory response and early wound healing. Of the POx loaded patches, GFC NHS‐POx (TTH 20.4 s, p = .019) and GFC‐NHS‐POx1.5 (TTH 0.0 s, p = .003) showed significantly faster TTH compared to TachoSil® (TTH 95.4 s), and were comparable to Veriset™ (TTH 17.0 s). Three patches, GFC‐NHS‐POx 1.5 (TTH 0.0 s, p = .016), ORC NHS‐POx:NU‐POx (TTH 91.4 s, p = .033), and ORC‐PLGA NHS‐POx:NU‐POx (TTH 105.6 s, p = .04) had a lower TTH compared to their own blank carrier (TTH 74.9, 157.8, and 195.7 s, respectively). With regard to biocompatibility, all POx loaded patches showed results comparable to TachoSil® and Veriset™. NHS‐POx‐loaded hemostatic patch demonstrate fast and effective hemostasis, comparable or better than commercially available hemostatic patches, with similar early biocompatibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin A Roozen
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rosa P Félix Lanao
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,GATT Technologies BV, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry van Goor
- Department of Surgery, RadboudUMC, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Reijnen LM, Van der Veen D, Warlé MC, Holewijn S, Lardenoije JW, Reijnen MMPJ. The relation between physical fitness, frailty and all-cause mortality after elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2021; 74:1172-1182.e2. [PMID: 33940067 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.04.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate determination of probable surgical outcomes is fundamental in decision-making regarding appropriate abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment. These outcomes depend, among other factors, on patient-related factors such as physical fitness. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between physical fitness, measured by the metabolic equivalent of task (MET) score and the five-factor Modified Frailty Index (MFI-5), and all-cause mortality. METHODS Four hundred twenty-nine patients undergoing elective endovascular treatment of an infrarenal aortic aneurysm (EVAR) from January 2011 to September 2018 were identified in an existing local abdominal aortic aneurysm database. Physical fitness was measured by the MFI-5 and the METs as registered during preoperative screening. The primary end point was 1-year all-cause mortality and secondary end points included 5-year all-cause mortality, freedom from aneurysm-related mortality and aneurysm-related reinterventions. Correlations were analyzed using Spearman's rho and survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. The effect of physical fitness on mortality was assessed by binary logistics regression analyses. RESULTS There was a positive correlation between the MFI-5 and 1-year all-cause mortality (Rho = 0.163; P = .001), but not between the METs and 1-year all-cause mortality (Rho = -0.083; P = .124). A significant correlation between both MFI-5 and METs and 5-year all-cause mortality was observed (Rho = 0.255; P < .001 and Rho = -0.154; P = .004). When stratified by the MFI-5, the 1- and 5-year follow-up survival rates were 95.1% and 85.9%, respectively, in the group with the lowest MFI-5 and 74.5% and 33.1% in the group with the highest MFI-5 score (P = .007 and P < .001). When stratified by METs categories for 1-year follow-up, no significant differences in survival between the groups were observed (P = .090). The 5-year follow-up survival rate was 39.4% in the lowest METs category and 76.3% in the highest METs category (P = .039). Logistic regression analysis, assessing the impact of age, sex, METs, and the MFI-5 on the risk of all-cause mortality, showed that only age and the MFI-5 made a significant contribution. CONCLUSIONS There is a significant positive association between the MFI-5 and both the 1- and 5-year all-cause mortality rates after EVAR; METs only correlated with the 5-year all-cause mortality. Only age and the MFI-5 contributed to predicting overall survival after EVAR; therefore, it could be recommended to add the MFI-5 for guidance in preoperative counselling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne Holewijn
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michel M P J Reijnen
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Multi-Modality Medical Imaging group, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Luijten JC, Poyck PP, D'hauwers K, Warlé MC. The influence of internal iliac artery occlusion after endovascular abdominal aneurysm repair on buttock claudication and erectile dysfunction: a matched case-control study. J Cardiovasc Surg 2020; 61:451-458. [DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.19.10719-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
|
29
|
Albers KI, Polat F, Panhuizen IF, Snoeck MMJ, Scheffer GJ, de Boer HD, Warlé MC. The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the early quality of recovery with perioperative care according to the enhanced recovery principles (RECOVER): study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials 2020; 21:541. [PMID: 32552782 PMCID: PMC7301516 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-020-04496-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2019] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence for the use of lower insufflation pressures during laparoscopic surgery. Deep neuromuscular blockade allows for a safe reduction in intra-abdominal pressure without compromising the quality of the surgical field. While there is considerable evidence to support superior surgical conditions during deep neuromuscular blockade, there is only a limited amount of studies investigating patient outcomes. Moreover, results are not always consistent between studies and vary between different types of laparoscopic surgery. This study will investigate the effect of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum facilitated by deep NMB on quality of recovery after laparoscopic colorectal surgery. METHODS The RECOVER study is a multicenter double-blinded randomized controlled trial consisting of 204 patients who will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to group A, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (8 mmHg) facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade (post tetanic count of 1-2), or group B, normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mmHg) with moderate neuromuscular blockade (train-of-four response of 1-2). The primary outcome is quality of recovery on postoperative day 1, quantified by the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire. DISCUSSION Few studies have investigated the effect of lower insufflation pressures facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade on patient outcomes after laparoscopic colorectal procedures. This study will identify whether low pressure pneumoperitoneum and deep neuromuscular blockade will enhance recovery after colorectal laparoscopic surgery and, moreover, if this could be a valuable addition to the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT 2018-001485-42. Registered on April 9, 2018. Clinicaltrials.govNCT03608436. Registered on July 30, 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim I. Albers
- Department of Surgery and Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Fatih Polat
- Department of Surgery, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Ivo F. Panhuizen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Marc M. J. Snoeck
- Department of Anesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans D. de Boer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Martini General Hospital, Van Swietenplein 1, 9728 NT Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van den Heuvel SAS, van der Wal SEI, Bronkhorst EM, Warlé MC, Ronday M, Plat J, van Alfen N, Joosten LAB, Lerou JGC, Vissers KCP, Steegers MAH. Acute Cytokine Response During Breast Cancer Surgery: Potential Role of Dexamethasone and Lidocaine and Relationship with Postoperative Pain and Complications - Analysis of Three Pooled Pilot Randomized Controlled Trials. J Pain Res 2020; 13:1243-1254. [PMID: 32547185 PMCID: PMC7266394 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s252377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose An imbalance in perioperative cytokine response may cause acute pain and postoperative complications. Anesthetic drugs modulate this cytokine response, but their role in non-major breast cancer surgery is unclear. In an exploratory study, we investigated whether intravenous lidocaine and dexamethasone could modulate the cytokine response into an anti-inflammatory direction. We also evaluated interrelationships between cytokine levels, pain scores and postoperative complications. Our goal is to develop multimodal analgesia regimens optimizing outcome after breast cancer surgery. Patients and Methods Forty-eight patients undergoing a lumpectomy were randomly assigned to placebo or lidocaine (1.5 mg⋅kg−1 followed by 2 mg⋅kg−1⋅hour−1) supplemented by dexamethasone zero, 4 or 8 mg, yielding six groups of eight patients. Interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-10 levels and pain scores were measured at baseline and four hours postoperatively. We assessed postoperative complications occurring within 30 days. We noted persistent pain and infections as potential immune-related complications (PIRC). We used multiple regression to disentangle the effects of the individual study drugs (given by their partial regression coefficients (b)). Odds ratios (OR) estimated the link between pain scores and complications. Results Dexamethasone 8 mg increased IL-10 (b=12.70 (95% CI=8.06–17.34), P<0.001). Dexamethasone 4 mg and 8 mg decreased the ratio IL-6/IL-10 (b=−2.60 (−3.93 to −1.26), P<0.001 and b=−3.59 (−5.04 to −2.13), P<0.001, respectively). We could not show modulatory effects of lidocaine on cytokines. High pain scores were linked to the occurrence of PIRC’s (OR=2.028 (1.134–3.628), P=0.017). Cytokine levels were not related either to acute pain or PIRC. Conclusion Dexamethasone modulated the perioperative cytokine response into an anti-inflammatory direction. An overall lidocaine effect was not found. Patients with higher pain scores suffered from more 30-day PIRCs. Cytokine levels were not associated with pain or more postoperative complications, even not with PIRC. Larger studies in breast cancer surgery are needed to confirm these explorative results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra A S van den Heuvel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Selina E I van der Wal
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Ewald M Bronkhorst
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - May Ronday
- Department of Anesthesiology, Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Judith Plat
- Department of Anesthesiology, Alexander Monro Breast Cancer Hospital, Bilthoven, the Netherlands
| | - Nens van Alfen
- Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behavior, Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Leo A B Joosten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Radboud Centre for Infectious Diseases, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Jos G C Lerou
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Kris C P Vissers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique A H Steegers
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Albers KI, Polat F, Loonen T, Graat LJ, Mulier JP, Snoeck MMJ, Panhuizen IF, Vermulst AA, Scheffer GJ, Warlé MC. Visualising improved peritoneal perfusion at lower intra-abdominal pressure by fluorescent imaging during laparoscopic surgery: A randomised controlled study. Int J Surg 2020; 77:8-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
32
|
Jalalzadeh H, Indrakusuma R, Koelemay MJW, Balm R, Van den Akker LH, Van den Akker PJ, Akkersdijk GJ, Akkersdijk GP, Akkersdijk WL, van Andringa de Kempenaer MG, Arts CH, Avontuur JA, Baal JG, Bakker OJ, Balm R, Barendregt WB, Bender MH, Bendermacher BL, van den Berg M, Berger P, Beuk RJ, Blankensteijn JD, Bleker RJ, Bockel JH, Bodegom ME, Bogt KE, Boll AP, Booster MH, Borger van der Burg BL, de Borst GJ, Bos-van Rossum WT, Bosma J, Botman JM, Bouwman LH, Breek JC, Brehm V, Brinckman MJ, van den Broek TH, Brom HL, de Bruijn MT, de Bruin JL, Brummel P, van Brussel JP, Buijk SE, Buimer MG, Burger DH, Buscher HC, den Butter G, Cancrinus E, Castenmiller PH, Cazander G, Coveliers HM, Cuypers PH, Daemen JH, Dawson I, Derom AF, Dijkema AR, Diks J, Dinkelman MK, Dirven M, Dolmans DE, van Doorn RC, van Dortmont LM, van der Eb MM, Eefting D, van Eijck GJ, Elshof JW, Elsman BH, van der Elst A, van Engeland MI, van Eps RG, Faber MJ, de Fijter WM, Fioole B, Fritschy WM, Geelkerken RH, van Gent WB, Glade GJ, Govaert B, Groenendijk RP, de Groot HG, van den Haak RF, de Haan EF, Hajer GF, Hamming JF, van Hattum ES, Hazenberg CE, Hedeman Joosten PP, Helleman JN, van der Hem LG, Hendriks JM, van Herwaarden JA, Heyligers JM, Hinnen JW, Hissink RJ, Ho GH, den Hoed PT, Hoedt MT, van Hoek F, Hoencamp R, Hoffmann WH, Hoksbergen AW, Hollander EJ, Huisman LC, Hulsebos RG, Huntjens KM, Idu MM, Jacobs MJ, van der Jagt MF, Jansbeken JR, Janssen RJ, Jiang HH, de Jong SC, Jongkind V, Kapma MR, Keller BP, Khodadade Jahrome A, Kievit JK, Klemm PL, Klinkert P, Knippenberg B, Koedam NA, Koelemay MJ, Kolkert JL, Koning GG, Koning OH, Krasznai AG, Krol RM, Kropman RH, Kruse RR, van der Laan L, van der Laan MJ, van Laanen JH, Lardenoye JH, Lawson JA, Legemate DA, Leijdekkers VJ, Lemson MS, Lensvelt MM, Lijkwan MA, Lind RC, van der Linden FT, Liqui Lung PF, Loos MJ, Loubert MC, Mahmoud DE, Manshanden CG, Mattens EC, Meerwaldt R, Mees BM, Metz R, Minnee RC, de Mol van Otterloo JC, Moll FL, Montauban van Swijndregt YC, Morak MJ, van de Mortel RH, Mulder W, Nagesser SK, Naves CC, Nederhoed JH, Nevenzel-Putters AM, de Nie AJ, Nieuwenhuis DH, Nieuwenhuizen J, van Nieuwenhuizen RC, Nio D, Oomen AP, Oranen BI, Oskam J, Palamba HW, Peppelenbosch AG, van Petersen AS, Peterson TF, Petri BJ, Pierie ME, Ploeg AJ, Pol RA, Ponfoort ED, Poyck PP, Prent A, Ten Raa S, Raymakers JT, Reichart M, Reichmann BL, Reijnen MM, Rijbroek A, van Rijn MJ, de Roo RA, Rouwet EV, Rupert CG, Saleem BR, van Sambeek MR, Samyn MG, van 't Sant HP, van Schaik J, van Schaik PM, Scharn DM, Scheltinga MR, Schepers A, Schlejen PM, Schlosser FJ, Schol FP, Schouten O, Schreinemacher MH, Schreve MA, Schurink GW, Sikkink CJ, Siroen MP, Te Slaa A, Smeets HJ, Smeets L, de Smet AA, de Smit P, Smit PC, Smits TM, Snoeijs MG, Sondakh AO, van der Steenhoven TJ, van Sterkenburg SM, Stigter DA, Stigter H, Strating RP, Stultiëns GN, Sybrandy JE, Teijink JA, Telgenkamp BJ, Testroote MJ, The RM, Thijsse WJ, Tielliu IF, van Tongeren RB, Toorop RJ, Tordoir JH, Tournoij E, Truijers M, Türkcan K, Tutein Nolthenius RP, Ünlü Ç, Vafi AA, Vahl AC, Veen EJ, Veger HT, Veldman MG, Verhagen HJ, Verhoeven BA, Vermeulen CF, Vermeulen EG, Vierhout BP, Visser MJ, van der Vliet JA, Vlijmen-van Keulen CJ, Voesten HG, Voorhoeve R, Vos AW, de Vos B, Vos GA, Vriens BH, Vriens PW, de Vries AC, de Vries JP, de Vries M, van der Waal C, Waasdorp EJ, Wallis de Vries BM, van Walraven LA, van Wanroij JL, Warlé MC, van Weel V, van Well AM, Welten GM, Welten RJ, Wever JJ, Wiersema AM, Wikkeling OR, Willaert WI, Wille J, Willems MC, Willigendael EM, Wisselink W, Witte ME, Wittens CH, Wolf-de Jonge IC, Yazar O, Zeebregts CJ, van Zeeland ML. Editor's Choice - Nationwide Analysis of Patients Undergoing Iliac Artery Aneurysm Repair in the Netherlands. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2020; 60:49-55. [PMID: 32331994 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2020.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 02/04/2020] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The new 2019 guideline of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) recommends consideration for elective iliac artery aneurysm (eIAA) repair when the iliac diameter exceeds 3.5 cm, as opposed to 3.0 cm previously. The current study assessed diameters at time of eIAA repair and ruptured IAA (rIAA) repair and compared clinical outcomes after open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). METHODS This retrospective observational study used the nationwide Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) registry that includes all patients who undergo aorto-iliac aneurysm repair in the Netherlands. All patients who underwent primary IAA repair between 1 January 2014 and 1 January 2018 were included. Diameters at time of eIAA and rIAA repair were compared in a descriptive fashion. The anatomical location of the IAA was not registered in the registry. Patient characteristics and outcomes of OSR and EVAR were compared with appropriate statistical tests. RESULTS The DSAA registry comprised 974 patients who underwent IAA repair. A total of 851 patients were included after exclusion of patients undergoing revision surgery and patients with missing essential variables. eIAA repair was carried out in 713 patients, rIAA repair in 102, and symptomatic IAA repair in 36. OSR was performed in 205, EVAR in 618, and hybrid repairs and conversions in 28. The median maximum IAA diameter at the time of eIAA and rIAA repair was 43 (IQR 38-50) mm and 68 (IQR 58-85) mm, respectively. Mortality was 1.3% (95% CI 0.7-2.4) after eIAA repair and 25.5% (95% CI 18.0-34.7) after rIAA repair. Mortality was not significantly different between the OSR and EVAR subgroups. Elective OSR was associated with significantly more complications than EVAR (intra-operative: 9.8% vs. 3.6%, post-operative: 34.0% vs. 13.8%, respectively). CONCLUSION In the Netherlands, most eIAA repairs are performed at diameters larger than recommended by the ESVS guideline. These findings appear to support the recent increase in the threshold diameter for eIAA repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Jalalzadeh
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Reza Indrakusuma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mark J W Koelemay
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron Balm
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L H Van den Akker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P J Van den Akker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J Akkersdijk
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G P Akkersdijk
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W L Akkersdijk
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G van Andringa de Kempenaer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C H Arts
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A Avontuur
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J G Baal
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O J Bakker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Balm
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W B Barendregt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M H Bender
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B L Bendermacher
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M van den Berg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Berger
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Beuk
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J D Blankensteijn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Bleker
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H Bockel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M E Bodegom
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K E Bogt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A P Boll
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M H Booster
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B L Borger van der Burg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J de Borst
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W T Bos-van Rossum
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Bosma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Botman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L H Bouwman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J C Breek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V Brehm
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Brinckman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T H van den Broek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H L Brom
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M T de Bruijn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J L de Bruin
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Brummel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J P van Brussel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S E Buijk
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Buimer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D H Burger
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H C Buscher
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G den Butter
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Cancrinus
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P H Castenmiller
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G Cazander
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H M Coveliers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P H Cuypers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H Daemen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I Dawson
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A F Derom
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A R Dijkema
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Diks
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M K Dinkelman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Dirven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D E Dolmans
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C van Doorn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L M van Dortmont
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M M van der Eb
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Eefting
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J van Eijck
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W Elshof
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B H Elsman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A van der Elst
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M I van Engeland
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R G van Eps
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Faber
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W M de Fijter
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Fioole
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W M Fritschy
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R H Geelkerken
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W B van Gent
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G J Glade
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Govaert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R P Groenendijk
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H G de Groot
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R F van den Haak
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E F de Haan
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G F Hajer
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J F Hamming
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E S van Hattum
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C E Hazenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P P Hedeman Joosten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J N Helleman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L G van der Hem
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Hendriks
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A van Herwaarden
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J M Heyligers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J W Hinnen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Hissink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G H Ho
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P T den Hoed
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M T Hoedt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F van Hoek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Hoencamp
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W H Hoffmann
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A W Hoksbergen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Hollander
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L C Huisman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R G Hulsebos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K M Huntjens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M M Idu
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Jacobs
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M F van der Jagt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J R Jansbeken
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Janssen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H H Jiang
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S C de Jong
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V Jongkind
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M R Kapma
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B P Keller
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Khodadade Jahrome
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J K Kievit
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P L Klemm
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P Klinkert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Knippenberg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N A Koedam
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Koelemay
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J L Kolkert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G G Koning
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O H Koning
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A G Krasznai
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R M Krol
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R H Kropman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R R Kruse
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L van der Laan
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J van der Laan
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H van Laanen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H Lardenoye
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A Lawson
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D A Legemate
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V J Leijdekkers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M S Lemson
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M M Lensvelt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A Lijkwan
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C Lind
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F T van der Linden
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P F Liqui Lung
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Loos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C Loubert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D E Mahmoud
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C G Manshanden
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E C Mattens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Meerwaldt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B M Mees
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Metz
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C Minnee
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J C de Mol van Otterloo
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F L Moll
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Y C Montauban van Swijndregt
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Morak
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R H van de Mortel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W Mulder
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S K Nagesser
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C C Naves
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H Nederhoed
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A M Nevenzel-Putters
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A J de Nie
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D H Nieuwenhuis
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Nieuwenhuizen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R C van Nieuwenhuizen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Nio
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A P Oomen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B I Oranen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Oskam
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H W Palamba
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A G Peppelenbosch
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A S van Petersen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T F Peterson
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B J Petri
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M E Pierie
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A J Ploeg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R A Pol
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E D Ponfoort
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P P Poyck
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Prent
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Ten Raa
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J T Raymakers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Reichart
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B L Reichmann
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M M Reijnen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Rijbroek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J van Rijn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R A de Roo
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E V Rouwet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C G Rupert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B R Saleem
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M R van Sambeek
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Samyn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H P van 't Sant
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J van Schaik
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P M van Schaik
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D M Scharn
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M R Scheltinga
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Schepers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P M Schlejen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F J Schlosser
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - F P Schol
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O Schouten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M H Schreinemacher
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M A Schreve
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G W Schurink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J Sikkink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M P Siroen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Te Slaa
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H J Smeets
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L Smeets
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A A de Smet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P de Smit
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P C Smit
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T M Smits
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Snoeijs
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A O Sondakh
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - T J van der Steenhoven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S M van Sterkenburg
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D A Stigter
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Stigter
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R P Strating
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G N Stultiëns
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J E Sybrandy
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A Teijink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B J Telgenkamp
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Testroote
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R M The
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W J Thijsse
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I F Tielliu
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R B van Tongeren
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Toorop
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J H Tordoir
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Tournoij
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Truijers
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Türkcan
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R P Tutein Nolthenius
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ç Ünlü
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A A Vafi
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C Vahl
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Veen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H T Veger
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M G Veldman
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H J Verhagen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B A Verhoeven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C F Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E G Vermeulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B P Vierhout
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M J Visser
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J A van der Vliet
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J Vlijmen-van Keulen
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H G Voesten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R Voorhoeve
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A W Vos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B de Vos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G A Vos
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B H Vriens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P W Vriens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A C de Vries
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J P de Vries
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M de Vries
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C van der Waal
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E J Waasdorp
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B M Wallis de Vries
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - L A van Walraven
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J L van Wanroij
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C Warlé
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - V van Weel
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A M van Well
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - G M Welten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J Welten
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J J Wever
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A M Wiersema
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O R Wikkeling
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W I Willaert
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - J Wille
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M C Willems
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E M Willigendael
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - W Wisselink
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M E Witte
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C H Wittens
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - I C Wolf-de Jonge
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - O Yazar
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - C J Zeebregts
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M L van Zeeland
- Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bruintjes MHD, d'Ancona FCH, Zhu X, Hoitsma AJ, Warlé MC. An Update on Early Urological Complications in Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Study. Ann Transplant 2019; 24:617-624. [PMID: 31792196 PMCID: PMC6909919 DOI: 10.12659/aot.920086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
<strong>BACKGROUND</strong> This study aimed to provide an update on the occurrence of early urological complications in living-donor and deceased-donor kidney transplantation (KTX). <strong>MATERIAL AND METHODS</strong> Data on all kidney transplant recipients in the Netherlands between January 2005 and December 2015 were retrieved from the prospectively collected Dutch National Organ Transplant Registry Database (NOTR). We assessed the incidence of major urological complications (MUCs) within 3 months after KTX, defined as urinary leakage and ureteral obstruction. Outcomes of living donor and deceased donor kidney transplants were compared. We performed regression analysis to identify predictive factors of urological complications and studied the influence of early urological complications on graft and patient survival. We performed an additional sub-study to explore the influence of preservation of the peri-ureteric connective tissue in living-donor KTX on the occurrence of urological complications. <strong>RESULTS</strong> Among 3329 kidney transplant recipients, urological complications occurred in 208 patients (6.2%) within 3 months after surgery. There were no significant differences in complication rates between recipients from living donors and deceased donors. Multiple regression analysis showed that older donor age and previous cardiac events of the recipient were predictors for the development of urological complications. Graft and patient survival were not affected by early MUCs. The additional sub-study showed that preservation of peri-ureteric tissue within living-donor KTX was not independently associated with urological complications. <strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong> Many living- and deceased-donor KTX recipients have early urological complications. MUCs did not affect long-term graft or patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira H D Bruintjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.,Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Frank C H d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Xiaoye Zhu
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Bruintjes MHD, Langenhuijsen JF, Kusters A, Hilbrands LB, d'Ancona FCH, Warlé MC. Double J stent is superior to externally draining ureteric stent in enhancing recovery after kidney transplantation - A prospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2019; 71:175-181. [PMID: 31600570 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2019] [Revised: 09/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Routine intraoperative ureteric stenting lowers the rate of urological complications after kidney transplantation. However, there is no consensus about the optimal stent design and duration. The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compare the influence of double J (JJ) stents and externally draining percutaneous (PC) stents on the early quality of recovery after living donor kidney transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective cohort study was performed in two consecutive cohorts of 40 patients who underwent living donor kidney transplantation at the Radboud university medical center between April 2016 and October 2017. The first cohort of 40 patients received a 6-French externally draining PC stent. The second cohort of 40 patients received a 6-French/14 cm JJ stent. We compared the influence of the stent design on the quality of early post-operative recovery (measured by the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire) and the length of hospital stay. RESULTS Patients with a JJ stent scored significantly better on the Quality of Recovery score on the third and fifth postoperative day, when compared to patients with a PC stent. Furthermore, in comparison to patients with a PC stent, patients with a JJ stent were earlier mobilising and independent in daily activities, resulting in a shorter length of hospital stay. The number of postoperative urological complications was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION The use of JJ stents during living donor kidney transplantations improves the postoperative recovery and shortens the length of hospital stay, when compared to PC stents without compromising the number of postoperative urological complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira H D Bruintjes
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Anneke Kusters
- Department of Urology, Queen Beatrix Regional Hospital Winterswijk, the Netherlands.
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Frank C H d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bruintjes MHD, van Helden EV, de Vries M, Wirken L, Evers AWM, van Middendorp H, Kloke H, d'Ancona FCH, Langenhuijsen JF, Steegers MAH, Warlé MC. Chronic pain following laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy: Prevalence and impact on quality of life. Am J Transplant 2019; 19:2825-2832. [PMID: 30868731 PMCID: PMC6790588 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.15350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 03/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is a disregarded topic. In this cross-sectional study, all consecutive patients who underwent an LDN at the Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc; 2003-2016) were approached for participation. Five hundred twelve living kidney donors were included and asked to complete two questionnaires, including the McGill Pain Questionnaire and the RAND Short Form-36 Health Status Inventory (RAND SF-36) regarding their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The mean prevalence of CPSP following LDN was 5.7%, with a mean follow-up time of 6 years. Possible predictors of CPSP following LDN are severe early postoperative pain, previous abdominal surgery, and preexisting backache. The RAND SF-36 revealed an impaired HRQoL in patients with CPSP when compared to patients without CPSP. In conclusion, this study revealed that the prevalence of CPSP following LDN is substantial. Given the possible association between the presence of CPSP and impaired HRQoL scores, living kidney donors should be well informed in the preoperative phase about the risk of CPSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esmee V. van Helden
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Marjan de Vries
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Lieke Wirken
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology UnitLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands,Department of Medical PsychologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Andrea W. M. Evers
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology UnitLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands,Department of Medical PsychologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Henriët van Middendorp
- Institute of Psychology, Health, Medical and Neuropsychology UnitLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands,Department of Medical PsychologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Heinrich Kloke
- Department of NephrologyRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of SurgeryRadboud University Medical CenterNijmegenThe Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Albers KI, Diaz-Cambronero O, Keijzer C, Snoeck MMJ, Warlé MC, Fuchs-Buder T. Revisiting the Classification of Neuromuscular Blockade, Aligning Clinical Practice and Research. Anesth Analg 2019; 129:e176-e178. [PMID: 31498186 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000004407] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Kim I Albers
- Departments of Anaesthesiology and Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands, Department of Anaesthesiology, Hospital Universitari i Politecnic la Fe, Valencia, Spain, Perioperative Medicine Research Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria la Fe, Valencia, Spain Department of Anaesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Department of Anaesthesiology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands Département d'Anesthésie et de Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Nancy/Brabois, Nancy, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs R J Landman
- From the Department of Physiology (T.R.J.L., D.H.J.T.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Schoon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine (Y.S.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands (M.C.W.)
| | - Frank-Erik de Leeuw
- Department of Neurology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands (F.-E.d.L.)
| | - Dick H J Thijssen
- From the Department of Physiology (T.R.J.L., D.H.J.T.), Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Ergün M, Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Donders RART, Hilbrands LB, Hoitsma AJ, Warlé MC. Prolonged Duration of Brain Death was Associated with Better Kidney Allograft Function and Survival: A Prospective Cohort Analysis. Ann Transplant 2019; 24:147-154. [PMID: 30872563 PMCID: PMC6434611 DOI: 10.12659/aot.913869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brain death initiates hemodynamic, immunological, and hormonal changes that potentially compromise organ quality for transplantation. Therefore, it is generally believed that organs should be procured as soon as possible after the declaration of brain death. However, conflicting data exist regarding the impact of brain death duration on long-term graft function and survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS The effect of duration of brain death on graft survival and function of 1869 adult transplant recipients receiving kidneys from deceased donors after brain death was analyzed, using relevant donor and recipient characteristics and allograft related factors. RESULTS Duration of brain death was a significant predictor for long-term graft survival, whilst there was no significant effect of duration of brain death on the incidence of delayed graft function or acute graft rejection after kidney transplantation. After dividing the study population into a "short durBD" (<10.6 hours) group and a "long durBD" (>10.6 hours) group, the 15-year graft survival estimates were significantly higher and the serum creatinine at 3 months after transplantation was significantly lower in the "long durBD" group. CONCLUSIONS Duration of brain death does not affect the incidence of delayed graft function or acute rejection after kidney transplantation. However, longer duration of brain death is associated with better kidney allograft function and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Ergün
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Rogier A R T Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Albers KI, Martini CH, Scheffer GJ, Warlé MC. Letter to the editor: considering the effects of deep neuromuscular blockade on endoscopic surgical conditions during transurethral resection of a bladder tumor (TURB). World J Urol 2018; 36:2093-2094. [PMID: 30039389 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2417-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- K I Albers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. .,Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - C H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - G J Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Scheffer GJ, van der Jagt M, Langenhuijsen H, Dahan A, Mulder JEEA, Willems S, Hilbrands LB, Donders R, van Laarhoven CJHM, d'Ancona FA, Warlé MC. Quality of Recovery After Low-Pressure Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy Facilitated by Deep Neuromuscular Blockade: A Randomized Controlled Study. World J Surg 2018; 41:2950-2958. [PMID: 28608013 PMCID: PMC5643361 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-017-4080-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Background The use of low intra-abdominal pressure (<10 mmHg) reduces postoperative pain scores after laparoscopic surgery.
Objective To investigate whether low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with deep neuromuscular blockade improves the quality of recovery after laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN). Design, setting and participants In a single-center randomized controlled trial, 64 live kidney donors were randomly assigned to 6 or 12 mmHg insufflation pressure. A deep neuromuscular block was used in both groups. Surgical conditions were rated by the five-point Leiden-surgical rating scale (L-SRS), ranging from 5 (optimal) to 1 (extremely poor) conditions. If the L-SRS was insufficient, the pressure was increased stepwise.
Main outcome measure The primary outcome measure was the overall score on the quality of recovery-40 (QOR-40) questionnaire at postoperative day 1. Results The difference in the QOR-40 scores on day 1 between the low- and standard-pressure group was not significant (p = .06). Also the overall pain scores and analgesic consumption did not differ. Eight procedures (24%), initially started with low pressure, were converted to a standard pressure (≥10 mmHg). A L-SRS score of 5 was significantly more prevalent in the standard pressure as compared to the low-pressure group at 30 min after insufflation (p < .01). Conclusions Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum facilitated by deep neuromuscular blockade during LDN does not reduce postoperative pain scores nor improve the quality of recovery in the early postoperative phase. The question whether the use of deep neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic surgery reduces postoperative pain scores independent of the intra-abdominal pressure should be pursued in future studies. Trial registration The trial was registered at clinicaltrial.gov before the start of the trial (NCT02146417).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gert J Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michel van der Jagt
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Simone Willems
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rogier Donders
- Department of HTA, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J H M van Laarhoven
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bruintjes MH, Scheffer GJ, Dahan A, Warlé MC. Reply to: Does deep neuromuscular block optimise surgical space better than moderate block? Br J Anaesth 2017; 119:1059-1060. [PMID: 29077826 DOI: 10.1093/bja/aex371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
|
42
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Braat AE, van der Jagt MFP, Scheffer GJ, Martini CH, Langenhuijsen JF, Dam RE, Huurman VA, Lam D, d'Ancona FC, Dahan A, Warlé MC. Deep neuromuscular blockade improves surgical conditions during low-pressure pneumoperitoneum laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2017. [PMID: 28643056 PMCID: PMC5770501 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5670-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Evidence indicates that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (PNP) reduces postoperative pain and analgesic consumption. A lower insufflation pressure may hamper visibility and working space. The aim of the study is to investigate whether deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) improves surgical conditions during low-pressure PNP. Methods This study was a blinded randomized controlled multicenter trial. 34 kidney donors scheduled for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy randomly received low-pressure PNP (6 mmHg) with either deep (PTC 1–5) or moderate NMB (TOF 0–1). In case of insufficient surgical conditions, the insufflation pressure was increased stepwise. Surgical conditions were rated by the Leiden-Surgical Rating Scale (L-SRS) ranging from 1 (extremely poor) to 5 (optimal). Results Mean surgical conditions were significantly better for patients allocated to a deep NMB (SRS 4.5 versus 4.0; p < 0.01). The final insufflation pressure was 7.7 mmHg in patients with deep NMB as compared to 9.1 mmHg with moderate NMB (p = 0.19). The cumulative opiate consumption during the first 48 h was significantly lower in patients receiving deep NMB, while postoperative pain scores were similar. In four patients allocated to a moderate NMB, a significant intraoperative complication occurred, and in two of these patients a conversion to an open procedure was required. Conclusions Our data show that deep NMB facilitates the use of low-pressure PNP during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy by improving the quality of the surgical field. The relatively high incidence of intraoperative complications indicates that the use of low pressure with moderate NMB may compromise safety during LDN. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT 02602964.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D M D Özdemir-van Brunschot
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - M F P van der Jagt
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G J Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - C H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J F Langenhuijsen
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R E Dam
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - V A Huurman
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D Lam
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F C d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M C Warlé
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Bruintjes MHD, Braat AE, Dahan A, Scheffer GJ, Hilbrands LB, d'Ancona FCH, Donders RART, van Laarhoven CJHM, Warlé MC. Effectiveness of deep versus moderate muscle relaxation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in enhancing postoperative recovery: study protocol for a randomized controlled study. Trials 2017; 18:99. [PMID: 28259181 PMCID: PMC5336688 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-017-1785-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2016] [Accepted: 01/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative recovery after live donor nephrectomy is largely determined by the consequences of postoperative pain and analgesia consumptions. The use of deep neuromuscular blockade has been shown to reduce postoperative pain scores after laparoscopic surgery. In this study, we will investigate whether deep neuromuscular blockade also improves the early quality of recovery after live donor nephrectomy. METHODS The RELAX-study is a phase IV, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial, in which 96 patients, scheduled for living donor nephrectomy, will be randomized into two groups: one with deep and one with moderate neuromuscular blockade. Deep neuromuscular blockade is defined as a post-tetanic count of 1-2. Our primary outcome measurement will be the Quality of Recovery-40 questionnaire (overall score) at 24 h after extubation. DISCUSSION This study is, to our knowledge, the first randomized study to assess the effectiveness of deep neuromuscular blockade during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy in enhancing postoperative recovery. The study findings may also be applicable for other laparoscopic procedures. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02838134 . Registered on 29 June 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moira H D Bruintjes
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Andries E Braat
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Albert Dahan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank C H d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier A R T Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis J H M van Laarhoven
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Warlé MC. Is the Reluctance for the Implantation of Right Kidneys Justified: Reply. World J Surg 2016; 41:326-327. [PMID: 27853814 PMCID: PMC5209412 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-016-3808-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Wever KE, Bruintjes MHD, Warlé MC, Hooijmans CR. Renal Perfusion and Function during Pneumoperitoneum: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Animal Studies. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0163419. [PMID: 27657740 PMCID: PMC5033590 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/08/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Both preclinical and clinical studies indicate that raised intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) associated with pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgical procedures can cause renal damage, the severity of which may be influenced by variables such as pressure level and duration. Several of these variables have been investigated in animal studies, but synthesis of all preclinical data has not been performed. This systematic review summarizes all available pre-clinical evidence on this topic, including an assessment of its quality and risk of bias. We performed meta-analysis to assess which aspects of the pneumoperitoneum determine the severity of its adverse effects. A systematic search in two databases identified 55 studies on the effect of pneumoperitoneum on renal function which met our inclusion criteria. There was high heterogeneity between the studies regarding study design, species, sex, pressure and duration of pneumoperitoneum, and type of gas used. Measures to reduce bias were poorly reported, leading to an unclear risk of bias in the majority of studies. Details on randomisation, blinding and a sample size calculation were not reported in ≥80% of the studies. Meta-analysis showed an overall increase in serum creatinine during pneumoperitoneum, and a decrease in urine output and renal blood flow. Subgroup analysis indicated that for serum creatinine, this effect differed between species. Subgroup analysis of pressure level indicated that urine output decreased as IAP level increased. No differences between types of gas were observed. Data were insufficient to reliably assess whether sex or IAP duration modulate the effect of pneumoperitoneum. Four studies assessing long-term effects indicated that serum creatinine normalized ≥24 hours after desufflation of pneumoperitoneum at 15mmHg. We conclude that harmful effects on renal function and perfusion during pneumoperitoneum appear to be robust, but evidence on long-term effects is very limited. The reliability and clinical relevance of these findings for healthy patients and patients at high risk of renal impairment remain uncertain. We emphasize the need for rigorous reporting of preclinical research methodology, which is of vital importance for clinical translation of preclinical data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberley E. Wever
- Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn R. Hooijmans
- Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, de Sévaux RGL, van Hamersvelt HW, Warlé MC. Outcome of Kidney Allografts in Recipients With a Femoral Arteriovenous Fistula: Report of Two Cases. Urol Case Rep 2016; 8:21-3. [PMID: 27313989 PMCID: PMC4910141 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2016.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2016] [Accepted: 05/13/2016] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Two patients, who were on hemodialysis over a femoral arteriovenous fistula, were transplanted in our center. Despite adequate blood pressure, perfusion of the renal allograft remained poor after completion of the vascular anastomoses. Ligation of the femoral arteriovenous fistula (1.6 L/min) led to adequate perfusion. Initial graft function was good. Although it remains unclear whether ischemia of a renal allograft is caused by venous hypertension or vascular steal due to a femoral arteriovenous fistula, it might be necessary to ligate a femoral arteriovenous fistula to obtain adequate graft perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jonker SJ, Menting TP, Warlé MC, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Wever KE. Preclinical Evidence for the Efficacy of Ischemic Postconditioning against Renal Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury, a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0150863. [PMID: 26963819 PMCID: PMC4786316 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI) is a major cause of kidney damage after e.g. renal surgery and transplantation. Ischemic postconditioning (IPoC) is a promising treatment strategy for renal IRI, but early clinical trials have not yet replicated the promising results found in animal studies. METHOD We present a systematic review, quality assessment and meta-analysis of the preclinical evidence for renal IPoC, and identify factors which modify its efficacy. RESULTS We identified 39 publications studying >250 control animals undergoing renal IRI only and >290 animals undergoing renal IRI and IPoC. Healthy, male rats undergoing warm ischemia were used in the vast majority of studies. Four studies applied remote IPoC, all others used local IPoC. Meta-analysis showed that both local and remote IPoC ameliorated renal damage after IRI for the outcome measures serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen and renal histology. Subgroup analysis indicated that IPoC efficacy increased with the duration of index ischemia. Measures to reduce bias were insufficiently reported. CONCLUSION High efficacy of IPoC is observed in animal models, but factors pertaining to the internal and external validity of these studies may hamper the translation of IPoC to the clinical setting. The external validity of future animal studies should be increased by including females, comorbid animals, and transplantation models, in order to better inform clinical trial design. The severity of renal damage should be taken into account in the design and analysis of future clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone J. Jonker
- SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Theo P. Menting
- Department of surgery, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C. Warlé
- Department of surgery, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Merel Ritskes-Hoitinga
- SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kimberley E. Wever
- SYstematic Review Centre for Laboratory animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Brunschot DMDÖV, Hoitsma AJ, van der Jagt MFP, d'Ancona FC, Donders RART, van Laarhoven CJHM, Hilbrands LB, Warlé MC. Nighttime kidney transplantation is associated with less pure technical graft failure. World J Urol 2015; 34:955-61. [PMID: 26369548 PMCID: PMC4921110 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-015-1679-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 08/28/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To minimize cold ischemia time, transplantations with kidneys from deceased donors are frequently performed during the night.
However, sleep deprivation of those who perform the transplantation may have adverse effects on cognitive and psychomotor performance and may cause reduced cognitive flexibility. We hypothesize that renal transplantations performed during the night are associated with an increased incidence of pure technical graft failure. Methods A retrospective analysis of data of the Dutch Organ Transplant Registry concerning all transplants from deceased donors between 2000 and 2013 was performed. Nighttime surgery was defined as the start of the procedure between 8 p.m. and 8 a.m. The primary outcome measure was technical graft failure, defined as graft loss within 10 days after surgery without signs of (hyper)acute rejection. Results Of 4.519 renal transplantations in adult recipients, 1.480 were performed during the night. The incidence of pure technical graft failure was 1.0 % for procedures started during the night versus 2.6 % for daytime surgery (p = .001). In a multivariable model, correcting for relevant donor, recipient and graft factors, daytime surgery was an independent predictor of pure technical graft failure (p < .001). Conclusions Limitation of this study is mainly to its retrospective design, and the influence of some relevant variables, such as the experience level of the surgeon, could not be assessed. We conclude that nighttime surgery is associated with less pure technical graft failures. Further research is required to explore factors that may positively influence the performance of the surgical team during the night.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Andries J Hoitsma
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michel F P van der Jagt
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank C d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier A R T Donders
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cees J H M van Laarhoven
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Luuk B Hilbrands
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, Rottier SJ, den Ouden JE, van der Jagt MF, d'Ancona FC, Kloke H, van der Vliet DJA, Schultze Kool LJ, Warlé MC. Preoperative CT-Angiography Predicts Ex Vivo Vein Length for Right Kidneys After Laparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy. Ann Transplant 2015; 20:532-8. [PMID: 26356283 DOI: 10.12659/aot.894131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Implantation of a kidney with a short renal vein is technically more challenging and therefore prone for technique-related complications. It remains unclear whether pre-operative computed tomography angiography (CTA), to assess vascular anatomy of the donor kidney, can be used to predict renal vein length. MATERIAL AND METHODS Right and left renal vein lengths of 100 consecutive kidney donors were measured in an oblique-coronal plane multiplanar reconstruction image of 100 consecutive kidney donors in whom ex vivo vein length was measured after recovery. In a second retrospective cohort of 100 consecutive kidney donors donating a right kidney, preoperative CTA vein length measurements were correlated to anastomosis time and early graft outcome. RESULTS Left and right renal vein lengths, measured on CTA, were 43.2 mm and 30.0 mm, respectively. No correlation was found between CTA and ex vivo measurements for the left renal vein (p=.610), whereas a significant correlation was found for the right renal vein (p=.021). In the retrospective cohort, right renal vein length was significantly correlated with the anastomosis time but not with early graft outcome. CONCLUSIONS The length of the right, but not the left, renal vein can be predicted by preoperative CTA, but this does not hold true for the left renal vein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Simone J Rottier
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Judith E den Ouden
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Frank C d'Ancona
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Heinrich Kloke
- Department of Nephrology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | - Leo J Schultze Kool
- Department of Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Özdemir-van Brunschot DMD, van Laarhoven KCJHM, Scheffer GJ, Pouwels S, Wever KE, Warlé MC. What is the evidence for the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum? A systematic review. Surg Endosc 2015; 30:2049-65. [PMID: 26275545 PMCID: PMC4848341 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-015-4454-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2015] [Accepted: 07/16/2015] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Background Laparoscopic surgery has several advantages when compared to open surgery, including faster postoperative recovery and lower pain scores. However, for laparoscopy, a pneumoperitoneum is required to create workspace between the abdominal wall and intraabdominal organs. Increased intraabdominal pressure may also have negative implications on cardiovascular, pulmonary, and intraabdominal organ functionings. To overcome these negative consequences, several trials have been performed comparing low- versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Methods A systematic review of all randomized controlled clinical trials and observational studies comparing low- versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Results and conclusions Quality assessment showed that the overall quality of evidence was moderate to low. Postoperative pain scores were reduced by the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum. With appropriate perioperative measures, the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum does not seem to have clinical advantages as compared to standard pressure on cardiac and pulmonary function. Although there are indications that low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is associated with less liver and kidney injury when compared to standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum, this does not seem to have clinical implications for healthy individuals. The influence of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on adhesion formation, anastomosis healing, tumor metastasis, intraocular and intracerebral pressure, and thromboembolic complications remains uncertain, as no human clinical trials have been performed. The influence of pressure on surgical conditions and safety has not been established to date. In conclusion, the most important benefit of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum is lower postoperative pain scores, supported by a moderate quality of evidence. However, the quality of surgical conditions and safety of the use of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum need to be established, as are the values and preferences of physicians and patients regarding the potential benefits and risks. Therefore, the recommendation to use low-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy is weak, and more studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denise M D Özdemir-van Brunschot
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Kees C J H M van Laarhoven
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Gert-Jan Scheffer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Sjaak Pouwels
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Kim E Wever
- Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel C Warlé
- Division of Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein-Zuid 10, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|