Intraocular Pressure After 2 Hours of Small-Diameter Scleral Lens Wear

Prospective assessment of corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure after scleral lens wear: A 12-month follow-up study

PURPOSE

To investigate the long-term influence of scleral lens (SL) wear on corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure (IOP) in irregular and regular corneas. Secondary goal comprised evaluate the fluid reservoir (FR) thickness overtime and correlate it with the changes in corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP.

METHODS

Seventy (70) eyes with irregular corneas (IC Group) and 21 eyes with regular corneas (RC Group) were fitted with 16.4 mm SL and wore the lenses for 12 months. Corrected IOP (IOPcc), Goldmann equivalent IOP (IOPg) and corneal biomechanical parameters (Corneal Hysteresis (CH) and Corneal Resistance Factor (CRF)) were measured with Ocular Response Analyzer. Slit lamp images were analyzed with ImageJ software to assess FR thickness overtime. Measurements were taken at lens dispensing visit prior lens wear (LDV1) and after 60 min of lens wear (LDV2) and at 1, 6 and 12-month follow-up visits. Measurements were done immediately after lens removal.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences on IOPcc, IOPg, CRF and CH over the follow-up visits in both groups. Mean IOPcc and IOPg fluctuations overtime were clinically insignificant and below 1 mmHg in both groups. IOPg, CH and CRF were significantly lower on IC Group (p < 0.001), although no statistically significant differences were found between groups for IOPcc. Regarding FR thickness, statistically significant differences were found over the follow-up on both groups, with a mean decrease of 186.29 µm on IC Group and 175.32 µm on RC Group (p < 0.001). Statistically significant moderate to high negative correlations between FR and IOPg, CRF and CH were found only in the RC Group.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term SL wear was not associated to changes in corneal biomechanical parameters neither on IOP as measured after lens removal. Besides IOP measurement without SL removal, more studies are needed to investigate the potential relationship with SL fitting characteristics (namely FR thickness).

Effect of Scleral Contact Lens Size and Duration of Wear on Intraocular Pressure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of scleral lens size and the duration of wear on intraocular pressure (IOP) during lens wear.

METHODS

Healthy adults were recruited for this prospective and randomized study. Intraocular pressure measurements were performed using a pneumotonometer. A block randomization was used to assign the order of scleral lens diameter of either 15.6 mm or 18.0 mm for 5-hr bilateral wear over a course of two visits. Scleral IOP (sIOP) was measured during the predetermined intervals, 1.25 hr apart, during the 5-hr scleral lens wear. Corneal IOP (cIOP) was measured before and after the scleral lens wear. The primary outcome measure was the mean change in sIOP from prelens insertion baseline.

RESULTS

Corneal IOP unchanged after scleral lens removal compared with the baseline measurements ( P =0.878). Smaller and larger lenses introduced significantly higher sIOP at 2.5 hr after lens insertion with the mean (95% CI) increase of 1.16 (0.54, 1.78) mm Hg and 1.37 (0.76, 1.99) mm Hg, respectively. There was no difference in IOP change between the smaller and larger diameter lenses ( P =0.590).

CONCLUSIONS

Well-fitted scleral lenses do not result in clinically significant changes in intraocular pressure during 5-hr lens wear in young and healthy individuals.

Assessment by Optical Coherence Tomography of Short-Term Changes in IOP-Related Structures Caused by Wearing Scleral Lenses

BACKGROUND

The mechanism that could increase intraocular pressure (IOP) during scleral lens (SL) wear is not fully understood, although it may be related to compression of the landing zone on structures involved in aqueous humor drainage.

METHODS

Thirty healthy subjects were fitted with two SLs of different sizes (L1 = 15.8 mm, L2 = 16.8 mm) for 2 h in the right eye and left eye as a control. Central corneal thickness (CCT), parameters of iridocorneal angle (ICA), Schlemm's canal (SC), and optic nerve head were measured before and after wearing both SLs. IOP was measured with a Perkins applanation tonometer before and after lens removal and with a transpalpebral tonometer before, during (0 h, 1 h, and 2 h), and after lens wear.

RESULTS

CCT increased after wearing L1 (8.10 ± 4.21 µm; p < 0.01) and L2 (9.17 ± 4.41 µm; p < 0.01). After L1 removal, the ICA parameters decreased significantly (p < 0.05). With L2 removal, nasal and temporal SC area and length were reduced (p < 0.05). An increased IOP with transpalpebral tonometry was observed at 2 h of wearing L1 (2.55 ± 2.04 mmHg; p < 0.01) and L2 (2.53 ± 2.22 mmHg; p < 0.01), as well as an increased IOP with Perkins applanation tonometry after wearing L1 (0.43 ± 1.07 mmHg; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

In the short term, SL resulted in a slight increase in IOP in addition to small changes in ICA and SC parameters, although it did not seem to be clinically relevant in healthy subjects.

Current Trends in Scleral Lens Prescription, Management, and Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

To report current trends in scleral contact lens prescription and management, including lens designs prescribed, care products recommended, and procedures performed during routine scleral lens (SL) evaluation.

METHODS

An online survey was designed by the Scleral Lenses in Current Ophthalmic Practice Evaluation study team and administered to eye care practitioners attending a specialty contact lens meeting. The survey was available from November 8, 2019, through March 31, 2020. Participants' demographic data were collected, along with information on lens diameters, landing zone (LZ) designs, recommended care products, and components of routine SL evaluation.

RESULTS

In total, 715 participants responded to at least one of the survey items of interest. Most lenses prescribed (63%) were 16 mm or more in diameter. Lenses with toric LZs were the most frequently prescribed (48%), followed by spherical (40%), quadrant-specific (8%), and impression-based or image-based designs (3%). Most participants (61%) recommended hydrogen peroxide products for lens care. Nonpreserved saline in a single-use vial was most frequently recommended to fill the bowl of the lens before application. Intraocular pressure was measured during SL evaluation by 45% of participants; 38% of participants routinely measured corneal thickness.

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioners increasingly are prescribing SLs with advanced LZ designs. Most practitioners recommend hydrogen peroxide-based disinfection systems and single-use vials of nonpreserved saline for lens care and application. Because differences in components of routine SL evaluations were reported, clinicians may benefit from reaching a consensus on essential components of SL evaluation.

Anatomical and physiological considerations in scleral lens wear: Intraocular pressure

Intraocular pressure (IOP) is maintained through complex and interrelated systems which control aqueous production and drainage, and it has been suggested that scleral lens (SL) wear may disrupt these vital homeostatic processes. This review provides an overview of anatomical and physiological processes that control IOP, identifies potential effects of SLs on these regulatory mechanisms, and examines studies that have attempted to quantify the effect of SLs on IOP. Lack of access to the cornea during SL wear makes accurate assessment of IOP challenging; therefore, a range of different assessment techniques and instruments have been employed to quantify IOP during and following SL wear. Some studies have evaluated IOP using standard techniques prior to lens application and following lens removal, or through a large central fenestration. Other studies have utilised instruments that facilitate assessment of IOP on the peripheral cornea or conjunctiva overlying the sclera (e.g. Schiotz, transpalpebral, and pneumatonometry). Two studies have recently evaluated changes in optic nerve structure during SL wear. Conflicting results have been reported on this topic, much of which examines changes in IOP in healthy subjects over limited periods of time. Currently, only a few studies have reported on long-term effects of SL wear on IOP in habitual SL wearers (after lens removal). Future research in this area must not only consider the fact that ocular conditions treated with SLs may potentially alter corneal biomechanical properties which can influence IOP, but also that these properties may be further altered by SL wear. Monitoring other risk factors for glaucoma (permanent alterations in optic nerve physiology, visual field defects) could provide a more comprehensive assessment of potentially increased risk of glaucomatous optic neuropathy due to SL wear. Ongoing clinical assessment of optic nerve structure and function is advisable in patients at risk for glaucoma who require SLs.

Tear Exchange, Intraocular Pressure, and Wear Characteristics of Quadrant-specific Versus Spherical Haptic Scleral Lenses

OBJECTIVES

To compare scleral lenses (SLs) with a quadrant-specific (study lens) or a spherical (habitual lens) landing zone in a crossover study.

METHODS

Seven participants (eight eyes) wore each of two lenses for 2 weeks before measurements. We measured visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, intraocular pressure (IOP), fluid reservoir clearance, corneal thickness, tear exchange, and lens experience. Variables were compared between lenses and before and after 2 hr of wear.

RESULTS

The visual acuity was not different between the study lens, 0.12 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), and habitual lens, 0.18 logMAR (median, P = 1.0). Contrast sensitivity was 1.3% under the study lens and 1.6% under the habitual lens ( P = 0.94). IOP did not change after 2 hr of wear for either lens (study lens, P = 0.33 and habitual lens, P = 0.74), and corneal thickness did not change during wear of either lens ( P = 0.44). The fluorescein concentration under the study lens did not change after 2 hr (99% of initial concentration; P = 0.84) but decreased to 46% of initial concentration under the habitual lens ( P = 0.008). Lens comfort was slightly better with the study lens (5.0 vs. 4.0, respectively; P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

SLs with spherical or quadrant-specific landing zones provide good vision and do not affect IOP or corneal thickness. However, tear exchange is greater under spherical lenses than under quadrant-specific lenses. The quadrant-specific lens provides greater patient comfort.

Corneal Biomechanics and Intraocular Pressure Following Scleral Lens Wear in Penetrating Keratoplasty and Keratoconus

OBJECTIVE

To compare corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure (IOP) in keratoconus and penetrating keratoplasty eyes before and after nonfenestrated scleral lens wear.

METHODS

Twenty-three participants were enrolled, and 37 eyes were included in the analysis (11 penetrating keratoplasty and 26 keratoconus). A range of corneal biomechanical parameters and IOP were measured using the CORVIS ST before and after 8 hr of nonfenestrated scleral lens wear (Keracare, Acculens, Denver, CO).

RESULTS

Before lens wear, penetrating keratoplasty eyes displayed significantly greater median values for central corneal thickness (97 μm thicker, P=0.02), IOP (3.89 mm Hg higher, P=0.01), and biomechanical parameter A2 length (0.48 mm longer, P=0.003) compared with keratoconic eyes. No significant changes in corneal biomechanical parameters or IOP were observed after scleral lens wear in either group (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Although nonfenestrated scleral contact lenses can induce a subatmospheric pressure after lens settling and compress tissue surrounding the limbus, no significant changes were detected in the corneal biomechanical parameters studied using CORVIS ST after scleral lens wear in eyes with penetrating keratoplasty and keratoconus.

Scleral Tonometry Precision During Scleral Lens Wear: A Pilot Study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the reproducibility, and therefore the utility, of using traditional tonometry devices for measuring intraocular pressure (IOP), while a prosthetic replacement of the ocular surface ecosystem device (PD) or scleral lens is applied to the eye.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty subjects (40 eyes) with keratoconus were enrolled. With PD applied, the first 10 consecutive patients had IOP measured multiple times with a handheld tonometer (Tono-Pen AVIA, Reichert, Depew, NY) on the superotemporal sclera 1 mm posterior to the PD edge. This identical procedure was repeated for the next 10 consecutive patients with a pneumatonometer (Model 30, Reichert, Depew, NY). Once three reliable measurements, as defined by the study protocol, were obtained for an eye, the procedure was repeated with the same tonometer device on the fellow eye.

RESULTS

The mean standard deviation for reliable IOP measurements was ±2.92 mmHg, median (IQR) of 2.62 (1.68 to 3.53) mmHg in the handheld tonometer group and ±1.98 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.07). The mean IOP range for the reliable IOP measurements was 5.5 ± 3.80 mmHg, median (IQR) of 5 (3 to 7) mmHg for the handheld tonometer group and 3.71 ±1.12 mmHg in the pneumatonometer group. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Handheld tonometry and pneumatonometry have poor reproducibility when used to measure scleral IOP in keratoconus patients, while a PD is applied to the eye. An alternative research model and methodology should be investigated and confirmed to have precision prior to proceeding with further analysis of any relationship between scleral lens wear and IOP.

Comparison of Pneumatonometry and Transpalpebral Tonometry Measurements of Intraocular Pressure during Scleral Lens Wear

SIGNIFICANCE

As scleral lens wear becomes more common, understanding the impact of these lenses upon ocular physiology is critically important. Studies on the effect of scleral lens wear upon intraocular pressure (IOP) have used different instruments and have reported conflicting results.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare assessment of IOP during scleral lens wear using pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry.

METHODS

Twenty healthy subjects wore a small-diameter (15.2 mm) and a large-diameter (18.0 mm) scleral lens on the right eye, each for 1 hour in randomized order. IOP was assessed with pneumatonometry and transpalpebral tonometry on both eyes before lens application, immediately after lens application, after 1 hour of lens wear, and immediately after lens removal. Paired t test compared mean IOP in the study eye to the control eye. Repeated-measures ANOVA was performed to take instrumentation, lens diameter, and their interaction into account in an analysis of the change in IOP in the study eye.

RESULTS

Mean peripheral IOP measured with pneumatonometry was not significantly different from baseline at any subsequent measurement. Measurements with transpalpebral tonometry, however, were significantly different during scleral lens wear immediately after application and after 1 hour of wear with both diameter lenses (P < .005), but were not significantly different after either sized lens was removed. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed that the instrument used to measure IOP was a significant factor in IOP changes found during lens wear (P ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of IOP during scleral lens wear varies based upon the instrument that is used. Although further studies are clearly needed to further elucidate this issue, clinicians should continue to monitor optic nerve structure and function in scleral lens wearers, as they do in all patients.

IOP and Optic Nerve Head Morphology during Scleral Lens Wear

SIGNIFICANCE

Scleral lenses (SLs) are increasing in scope, and understanding their ocular health impact is imperative. The unique fit of an SL raises concern that the landing zone causes compression of conjunctival tissue that can lead to resistance of aqueous humor outflow and increased intraocular pressure (IOP).

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess changes in optic nerve head morphology as an indirect assessment of IOP and evaluate other IOP assessment methods during SL wear.

METHODS

Twenty-six healthy adults wore SL on one randomly selected eye for 6 hours, whereas the fellow eye served as a control. Global minimum rim width (optical coherence tomography) and IOP (Icare, Diaton) were measured at baseline, 2 and 6 hours after SL application, and again after SL removal. Central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and fluid reservoir depth were monitored.

RESULTS

Minimum rim width thinning was observed in the test (-8 μm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -11 to -6 μm) and control (-6 μm; 95% CI, -9 to -3 μm) eyes after 6 hours of SL wear (P < .01), although the magnitude of thinning was not significantly greater in the lens-wearing eyes (P = .09). Mean IOP (Icare) significantly increased +2 mmHg (95% CI, +1 to +3 mmHg) in the test eyes (P = .002), with no change in the control eyes. Mean IOP changes with Diaton were +0.3 mmHg (95% CI, -0.9 to +3.2 mmHg) in the test eyes and +0.4 mmHg (95% CI, -0.8 to +1.7 mmHg) in the control eyes. However, Diaton tonometry showed poor within-subject variation and poor correlation with Icare. No clinically significant changes were observed in central corneal thickness or anterior chamber depth.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that SLs have a minimal effect on IOP homeostasis in the normal eye during SL wear and an insignificant impact on the optic nerve head morphology in healthy adult eyes.

CLEAR - Scleral lenses

Scleral lenses were the first type of contact lens, developed in the late nineteenth century to restore vision and protect the ocular surface. With the advent of rigid corneal lenses in the middle of the twentieth century and soft lenses in the 1970's, the use of scleral lenses diminished; in recent times there has been a resurgence in their use driven by advances in manufacturing and ocular imaging technology. Scleral lenses are often the only viable form of contact lens wear across a range of clinical indications and can potentially delay the need for corneal surgery. This report provides a brief historical review of scleral lenses and a detailed account of contemporary scleral lens practice including common indications and recommended terminology. Recent research on ocular surface shape is presented, in addition to a comprehensive account of modern scleral lens fitting and on-eye evaluation. A range of optical and physiological challenges associated with scleral lenses are presented, including options for the clinical management of a range of ocular conditions. Future applications which take advantage of the stability of scleral lenses are also discussed. In summary, this report presents evidence-based recommendations to optimise patient outcomes in modern scleral lens practice.

Effects of Scleral Contact Lenses for Keratoconus Management on Visual Quality and Intraocular Pressure

Purpose

To evaluate the visual acuity level achieved by scleral contact lens (CL) fitting in patients affected by keratoconus and to evaluate possible intraocular pressure (IOP) changes during the scleral CL wear using a transpalpebral tonometer.

Methods

In a prospective case series a comparison was made between visual acuity obtained with glasses, RGP and 16.8mm diameter scleral CL in 30 consecutive patients affected by keratoconus. IOP was tested during scleral CL wear by transpalpebral Diaton Tonometer (DT) and also by Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) before and after scleral CL wear.

Results

The mean logMAR visual acuity improved from 0.2±0.25SD with glasses and 0.1±0.02SD with RGP, to −0.002±0.041SD when using the scleral CL (p<0.05). The mean IOP value before scleral CL wear was 12.93mmHg±2.20SD when measured with GAT and 7.85mmHg±2.27SD when measured with DT. During scleral CL wear, IOP was assessed through DT, with a mean value of 8.86mmHg±2.36SD; values were stable after 8 hours of scleral CL use. Immediately after scleral CL removal, the mean IOP measured with GAT was 12.85mmHg ±2.40SD and the mean IOP measured with DT was 7.66mmHg±1.88SD. Therefore, during scleral CL wear, it was evidenced a small but statistically significant increase of the mean IOP value (1.01mmHg; p<0.01), with a reversion to values prior to application when scleral CL was removed.

Conclusion

Scleral CLs remarkably improved visual acuity in keratoconus patients when compared to glasses or RGP contact lenses. Even if it was evidenced a small increase of the mean IOP value during their wear, it may not be significant in otherwise healthy eyes. Statistical analysis demonstrated good agreement between GAT and DT but their numerical values presented a constant gap, that should be taken into account when there is a need to relate the DT values to the reference ones.

[Intraocular pressure with miniscleral contact lenses]

According to literature data, some experts do not exclude the possibility that scleral lens wear could influence intraocular pressure.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence of rigid gas permeable miniscleral contact lenses on intraocular pressure (IOP), keratometry readings and corneal thickness, and to study the correlation between scleral (IOPs) and corneal (IOPc) intraocular pressure using the Icare ic100 tonometer (model TAO11, Icare Finland Oy).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 99 volunteers without history of ocular diseases. The first group consisted of 66 participants (122 eyes) aged 22.3±2.2 years - IOPc and IOPs were measured by the Icare ic100 tonometer in order to determine the correlation. The second group (33 participants, aged 22.7±1.7 years) - day 1, diurnal IOPc and IOPs fluctuations were measured; on day 2, a miniscleral lens (diameter 14.9 mm) was placed on the study eye and was worn for 6 hours, the paired eye served as control. IOP was measured before, after lens placement, after 2 hours of lens wear, and before and after lens removal. Corneal topography was evaluated before and after lens removal.

RESULTS

In the first group, there was a weak but significant correlation between IOPc and IOPs (Spearman correlation coefficient 0.285, p=0.001). In the second group, IOPc in the study eye before lens placement (14.8±3.8 mm Hg) and IOPc after its removal (13.6±3.9 mm Hg) were not different from those in the control eye. There were also no statistically significant changes in IOPs before, during lens wear, and after lens removal. The central corneal thickness increased by 2.9% (p<0.001) after 6 hours of lens wear.

CONCLUSION

In young individuals without history of ocular diseases, wearing the miniscleral lens for 6 hours does not have significant influence on IOP and does not cause clinically significant corneal edema.

Intraocular pressure changes in neophyte scleral lens wearers: A prospective study

PURPOSE

To examine the variation in intraocular pressure (IOP) during the first six months of scleral lens wear.

METHODS

Thirty-two neophyte scleral lens wearers were recruited and IOP was measured using Goldman applanation tonometry before, and after 1 and 6 months of scleral lens wear (following lens removal). All scleral lenses were designed based on scleral topography or an impression of the ocular surface. Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir thickness were quantified using optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

Post-lens removal IOP displayed an increasing trend after 1 and 6 months of lens wear, but the magnitude of change was not clinically or statistically significant using several repeated measures analyses to account for sporadic missing longitudinal data (mean increase of 1 mmHg or less, p > 0.05). Central corneal thickness and the central post-lens fluid reservoir remained stable throughout the first six months of lens wear.

CONCLUSION

IOP measured following lens removal did not vary significantly during the first 6 months of lens wear in scleral lens neophytes. Further research is required to determine if IOP varies during lens wear, following lens removal, or after longer-term lens wear due to suction forces or tissue compression beneath the landing zone.

The impact of short-term fenestrated scleral lens wear on intraocular pressure

PURPOSE

To examine the influence of short-term fenestrated scleral lens wear on intraocular pressure (IOP) in healthy eyes.

METHODS

IOP was measured before, during, and after a brief period (1-2 min) of fenestrated, scleral lens wear, using a rebound tonometer, in fifty, young healthy adults (mean age 23 ± 4 years) with normal corneas.

RESULTS

Immediately following lens insertion, 48 of the 50 (96 %) of participants displayed an increase in IOP (mean ± SD increase in these participants of 3.8 ± 2.0 mmHg). Immediately following lens removal, 50 % of participants displayed a reduction in IOP, equal to or lower than, the pre-insertion IOP (-1.0 ± 0.8 mmHg lower than baseline). The remaining 50 % of participants displayed an IOP slightly greater than the pre-insertion IOP (1.6 ± 1.0 mmHg greater) after lens removal.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term fenestrated scleral lens wear resulted in a small, but statistically significant, increase in IOP in 96 % of young healthy participants (< 4 mmHg on average), which decreased to a level similar to pre-lens insertion IOP levels immediately following lens removal. Further research is required to determine if this measured change in IOP during scleral lens wear is artefactual, or an elevation in the true IOP.

Optical coherence tomography and scleral contact lenses: clinical and research applications

Anterior segment optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides a wealth of opportunities for modern contact lens practice. OCT imaging has numerous clinical and research applications related to the tear film, cornea, conjunctiva, sclera and ocular adnexae, in addition to soft, rigid, and hybrid contact lenses. This review summarises the potential use of OCT imaging in modern scleral contact lens practice including initial lens selection, assessing the scleral contact lens fit with respect to the cornea and sclera, and accurately quantifying the ocular response to lens wear. Recent advances in the understanding of anterior segment metrics including scleral thickness, curvature, toricity, and the anatomy of the corneoscleral limbal junction are also discussed.

Intra-ocular pressure variation associated with the wear of scleral lenses of different diameters

PURPOSE

To evaluate the variation of intra-ocular pressure during scleral lens wear, and the influence of the lens diameter on the results.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized study performed on Caucasian subjects (16 F; 5 M), aged 24.7 + 4.1 y.o. A diurnal variation pattern (IOPg) was established, then, transpalpebral IOP (IOPt) was taken before and during SL wear. One eye, randomly fitted with a 15.8 diameter SL (L1), was compared to the fellow eye, fitted with an 18 mm SL of the same design, thickness and material (L2). Anterior segment tomography was taken pre-and after lens removal.

RESULTS

Baseline IOPg (L1:15.2 + 3.1 mm HG; L2: 15.1 +/- 2.8 mm) did not reveal significant diurnal variations. Wearing L1, IOPt rose from 10.1 + 1.9 mm HG to 14.4 + 5.5 mm HG after 4.5 + 0.3 hrs, while with L2, it rose from 9.2 + 2.1 mm HG to 14.4 + 4.8 mm Hg. This difference is statistically significant based on time but not on lenses. Anterior segment parameters did not vary except for the anterior chamber volume (L1: -1.53 + 7.61 mm³; L2: -3.47 + 6.4 mm³), and for the corneal thickness (+2.1% with L1 and L2).

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that, as evaluated with a non-standard transpalpebral methodology, IOP during scleral lens wear may be increased in average by 5 mm Hg, regardless of the lens diameter. More work is needed to confirm if practitioners should be warned when using SL on populations at risk for glaucoma.