Whistleblowing in Healthcare: Allegations to Actions

The relationship between ethical position and whistleblowing: A cross-sectional study among nurses

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to determine nurses' ethical positions, whistleblowing intention and its causes, and to analyse the correlation between them, while revealing the personal and professional characteristics causing significant difference.

BACKGROUND

In today's challenging healthcare settings, ethical dilemmas are inherent to nursing practices, leading to situations whereby nurses must consider whistleblowing and reasons such as reporting medical errors or misbehaviors.

DESIGN

The study is descriptive, cross-sectional and correlational.

METHODS

The data were collected from a convenience sample consisting of 294 nurses between 1 April and 30 June 2019, in four hospitals in two cities. An introductory information form, Ethics Position Questionnaire, Whistleblowing Scale and Causes of Whistleblowing Scale were employed to collect data. The data were analysed with descriptive, correlational, comparative and internal consistency analyses (Guidelines for reporting cross-sectional studies (Data S1)).

RESULTS

It was found that nurses encountered (31.3%) and reported (85.9%) unethical incidents. According to the subscales, they obtained higher scores from idealism (4.37 ± 0.52), supportive whistleblowing (3.75 ± 0.72), and moral and professional values (3.77 ± 0.67). The Ethics Position Questionnaire, as well as the Whistleblowing Scale (r = .302) and the Causes of Whistleblowing Scale (r = .211) had a positive weak correlation (p < .001). Nurses' age, marital status, and professional and institutional experiences all created a significant difference (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

The nurses mostly encountered unethical incidents associated with management. The rates of reporting the unethical incidents were high, and they were found not hesitating to report using whistleblowing, yet intended to keep the incidents within the institution. In addition, idealistic nurses were more likely to whistleblow, and their causes for whistleblowing were mostly associated with moral and professional values.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

It is recommended that nurses' ethical position, and whistleblowing intentions and causes should be supported and improved through the corporate culture.

The principle of double effect and external whistleblowing in nursing

Nurses are generally expected to raise concerns when a harm or wrongdoing is committed against patients. Should their concerns not be adequately addressed, then nurses may take the decision to engage in external whistleblowing. Given that it could have a negative effect on the health care organization or service, nurses may question whether they should engage in external whistleblowing. Consequently, is there an ethical criterion to discern whether the negative effect on the health care organization or service is ethically permissible? This paper argues for the suitability of the Principle of Double Effect as an ethical criterion. The position of this paper is that external whistleblowing by a nurse when understood as an advocacy act with two effects (i.e. the effect of defending a patient and the further negative effect on the health care organization or service) can be ethically permissible through meeting the conditions of the Principle of Double Effect.