1
|
Kearns AJ. The principle of double effect and external whistleblowing in nursing. Nurs Outlook 2022; 70:807-819. [PMID: 36400577 DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 09/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Nurses are generally expected to raise concerns when a harm or wrongdoing is committed against patients. Should their concerns not be adequately addressed, then nurses may take the decision to engage in external whistleblowing. Given that it could have a negative effect on the health care organization or service, nurses may question whether they should engage in external whistleblowing. Consequently, is there an ethical criterion to discern whether the negative effect on the health care organization or service is ethically permissible? This paper argues for the suitability of the Principle of Double Effect as an ethical criterion. The position of this paper is that external whistleblowing by a nurse when understood as an advocacy act with two effects (i.e. the effect of defending a patient and the further negative effect on the health care organization or service) can be ethically permissible through meeting the conditions of the Principle of Double Effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan J Kearns
- School of Theology, Philosophy, and Music, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Palliative sedation is a well-recognized and commonly used medical practice at the end of life for patients who are experiencing refractory symptoms that cannot be controlled by other means of medical management. Given concerns about potentially hastening death by suppressing patients' respiratory drive, traditionally this medical practice has been considered ethically justifiable via application of the ethical doctrine known as the Principle of Double Effect. And even though most recent evidence suggests that palliative sedation is a safe and effective practice that does not hasten death when the sedative medications are properly titrated, the Principle of Double Effect is still commonly utilized to justify the practice of palliative sedation and any risk-however small-it may entail of hastening the death of patients. One less common clinical scenario where the Principle of Double Effect may still be appropriate ethical justification for palliative sedation is when the practice of palliative sedation is pursued concurrently with the active withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment-particularly the practice of compassionate extubation. This case study then describes an unconventional case of palliative sedation with concurrent compassionate extubation where Principle of Double Effect reasoning was effectively employed to ethically justify continuing to palliatively sedate a patient during compassionate extubation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan Potter
- Ethics Program, 5325Wellstar Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Steven Shields
- Ethics Program, 5325Wellstar Health System, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Renée Breen
- Palliative Medicine, 1366Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Davison S. The Doctrine of Double Effect and Potential Criminal Liability of Medical Practitioners in Australia. J Law Med 2021; 28:503-520. [PMID: 33768755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Recent parliamentary inquiries into end-of-life choices identify the need to provide legal certainty for health practitioners working in end-of-life care. A concern identified is the lack of clarity surrounding the operation, status and application of the doctrine of double effect. This discussion clarifies these concerns. Although the doctrine is judicially recognised in several overseas jurisdictions, in Australia the doctrine of precedent means that it does not form part of the common law. In most jurisdictions, the fault element for murder includes recklessness, and application of the doctrine does not avoid criminal liability being established against orthodox criminal law principles. Although the prosecution of a medical practitioner who incidentally causes death in the proper course of medical treatment is a rare event, it remains a live issue. Legislative protection of medical practitioners, as has occurred in Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia, is the means to achieve the certainty sought.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Davison
- Barrister, Victorian Bar, C/- Lennon's List, Melbourne
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sahin A, Prasad P, Cantin B, Rey A. [Extreme end-of-life situations and opioids : the double effect principle, a helpful guide]. Rev Med Suisse 2021; 17:147-149. [PMID: 33470572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
The death of a patient taking opioids can generate strong feelings of guilt. « Have I hastened my patient's death by my administration of opioids ? » Doubts may arise in certain situations, despite the proven safety of appropriate opioid use in the management of dyspnea and pain in the palliative care setting. Fearing the harms of opioid administration, some medical practitioners may undertreat patients, forsaking them to suffering. Other doctors, desperate to relieve their excruciating suffering at all cost, may in fact have recourse to euthanizing acts. This article seeks to answer this ethical dilemma with an overview of the double effect principle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayhan Sahin
- Médecine interne, Hôpital fribourgeois, 1708 Fribourg
| | - Pawan Prasad
- Médecine interne, Hôpital fribourgeois, 1708 Fribourg
| | - Boris Cantin
- Service de soins palliatifs, Hôpital fribourgeois, 1708 Fribourg
| | - Alicia Rey
- Service de soins palliatifs, Hôpital fribourgeois, 1708 Fribourg
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Arima H. Continuous deep sedation and the doctrine of double effect: Do physicians not intend to make the patient unconscious until death if they gradually increase the sedatives? Bioethics 2020; 34:977-983. [PMID: 32666526 PMCID: PMC7754306 DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Continuous deep sedation (CDS) has the effect of making the patient unconscious until death, and that it has this effect is clearly an undesirable aspect of CDS. However, some authors have recently maintained that many physicians do not intend this effect when practicing CDS. According to these authors, CDS is differentiated into two types; in what is called "gradual" CDS (or CDS as a result of proportionate palliative sedation), physicians start with low doses of sedatives and increase them only gradually, whereas in "rapid" CDS (or palliative sedation to unconsciousness), physicians rapidly administer a heavy dose that clearly induces unconsciousness from the beginning. The claim is that the physicians intend permanent unconsciousness only if they rapidly administer a heavy dose, but they do not intend it when the unconsciousness is the result of a gradual increase of sedatives. This paper attempts to refute these claims based on a close examination of the protocol of gradual CDS. If my argument is valid, the doctrine of double effect would not be useful in justifying most, if not all, cases of CDS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Affiliation(s)
- Scott D Halpern
- Palliative and Advanced Illness Research (PAIR) Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
- Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - Robert D Truog
- Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Franklin G Miller
- Division of Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giebel H. Ethical end-of-life palliative care: response to Riisfeldt. J Med Ethics 2020; 46:51-52. [PMID: 31395696 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2019-105451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2019] [Revised: 07/02/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
In a recent article, 1 Riisfeldt attempts to show that the principle of double effect (PDE) is unsound as an ethical principle and problematic in its application to palliative opioid and sedative use in end-of-life care. Specifically, he claims that (1) routine, non-lethal opioid and sedative administration may be "intrinsically bad" by PDE's standards, (2) continuous deep palliative sedation (or "terminal sedation") should be treated as a bad effect akin to death for purposes of PDE, (3) PDE cannot coherently be applied in cases where death "indirectly" furthers an agent's intended end of pain relief via medically appropriate palliative care, and (4) application of PDE requires sacrificing common beliefs about the sanctity of human life. I respond by showing that Riisfeldt's understanding of PDE is seriously mistaken: he misattributes Kantian and Millian reasoning to the principle and conflates acts' intrinsic properties with their effects. Further, a corrected understanding of PDE can address Riisfeldt's case-specific objections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Giebel
- Philosophy, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lorenzo Izquierdo D. [Bioethics theories, the protection of life and natural law]. Cuad Bioet 2019; 30:263-274. [PMID: 31618589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2018] [Accepted: 05/03/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Principlist Bioethics by Beauchamp and Childress has reached a prominent status in contemporary Bioethics. Nevertheless, it includes some important theoretical problems: some lacks when defining some concepts, a tendency to ethical relativism, etc. Among the ethical alternative approaches from which such problems can be solved, we think that the most appropiate is the Natural Law theory. It offers a reasoned reflection on the concept of good and on human basic goods and their relation with moral general principles. From such goods, this ethical theory supports the existence of actions that are always maleficent acts, that is, intrinsically and universally evil acts. The article applies the Natural Law theory to issues related to the protection of human life (abortion, euthanasia, self-defense and genetic manipulation)..
Collapse
|
9
|
Symons X. Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia. J Med Ethics 2018; 44:266-269. [PMID: 28899906 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2017-104230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 06/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/16/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The doctrine of double effect (DDE) is a principle of crucial importance in law and medicine. In medicine, the principle is generally accepted to apply in cases where the treatment necessary to relieve pain and physical suffering runs the risk of hastening the patient's death. More controversially, it has also been used as a justification for withdrawal of treatment from living individuals and physician-assisted suicide. In this paper, I will critique the findings of the controversial Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT) hearing Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia In that hearing, Dr Rodney Syme, a urologist and euthanasia advocate, was defending his practice of prescribing barbiturates to terminally ill patients. Syme claimed that he prescribed the drugs with the intention of relieving their existential suffering and not to assist in suicide; he argued that the DDE could be applied. Pace VCAT, I argue that this is an illegitimate application of DDE. I argue that a close scrutiny of Syme's actions reveals that, at the very least, he intended to give patients the option of suicide. He furthermore used what on a traditional definition of DDE would be considered a 'bad' means-the prescription of Nembutal-to achieve a 'good' end-the relief of suffering. The case demonstrates the crucial importance of analysing an agent's 'intention' and the 'effects' of their actions when applying DDE. Ethicists and, indeed, the judiciary need to attend to the ethical complexities of DDE when they assess the applicability of DDE to end of life care. If they fail to do this, the doctrine risks losing its legitimacy as an ethical principle.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Aberrant degradation of proteins is associated with many pathological states, including cancers. Mass spectrometric analysis of the tumor peptidome has the potential to provide biological insights on proteolytic processing in cancer. However, attempts to use the tumors peptidome information in cancer research have been fairly limited to date, largely due to the lack of effective approaches for robust peptidomics identification and quantification, and the prevalence of confounding factors and biases associated with sample handling and processing. To address this need, we have recently developed an effective and robust analytical platform as well as a novel informatics approach for comprehensive analyses of tissue peptidomes. The ability of this new peptidomics pipeline for high-throughput, comprehensive, and quantitative peptidomics analysis, as well as the suitability of clinical ovarian tumor samples with postexcision delay limited to less than 60min before freezing for peptidomics analysis, has been demonstrated. These initial analyses set a stage for further determination of molecular details and functional significance of the peptidomic activities in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao Liu
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Karin D Rodland
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States
| | - Richard D Smith
- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gavaghan C, King M. Can facilitated aid in dying be permitted by 'double effect'? Some reflections from a recent New Zealand case. J Med Ethics 2016; 42:361-366. [PMID: 27030484 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2016] [Accepted: 02/15/2016] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
While the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) remains controversial in ethical circles, it continues to be recognised in common law courts. In 2015, the High Court of New Zealand became the latest to acknowledge the existence of the DDE, in a case that challenged the prohibition on physician assisted dying. In so doing, the possibility was raised that the DDE could potentially be used in an untraditional way to provide a prima facie justification of "facilitated aid in dying" (FAID) in some cases.In this article, we develop and offer justification for this line of reasoning. If it can be shown that FAID sometimes satisfies the conditions for DDE, this, we suggest, may have significant implications for the aid in dying debate, not only in New Zealand, but more widely. Even if all of the elements of the DDE are not met in such cases, though, we suggest that one of those elements - the doctor's intent in providing FAID - may not always be such as to attract moral blame or criminal culpability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Gavaghan
- Faculty of Law, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Mike King
- Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Affiliation(s)
- Lih-Mei Liao
- University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | - Dan Wood
- University College London Hospitals, London NW1 2PG, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
This paper examines the recent prominent view in medical ethics that withdrawing life-sustaining treatment (LST) is an act of killing. I trace this view to the rejection of the traditional claim that withdrawing LST is an omission rather than an act. Although that traditional claim is not as problematic as this recent prominent view suggests, my main claim is that even if we accepted that withdrawing LST should be classified as an act rather than as an omission, it could still be classified as letting die rather than killing. Even though omissions are contrasted with acts, letting die need not be, for one can let die by means of acts. The remainder of the paper is devoted to establishing this claim and addresses certain objections to it.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
The Rule of Double Effect (RDE) holds that it may be permissible to harm an individual while acting for the sake of a proportionate good, given that the harm is not an intended means to the good but merely a foreseen side-effect. Although frequently used in medical ethical reasoning, the rule has been repeatedly questioned in the past few decades. However, Daniel Sulmasy, a proponent who has done a lot of work lately defending the RDE, has recently presented a reformulated and more detailed version of the rule. Thanks to its greater precision, this reinvented RDE avoids several problems thought to plague the traditional RDE. Although an improvement compared with the traditional version, we argue that Sulmasy's reinvented RDE will not stand closer scrutiny. Not only has the range of proper applicability narrowed significantly, but, more importantly, Sulmasy fails to establish that there is a morally relevant distinction between intended and foreseen effects. In particular, he fails to establish that there is any distinction that can account for the alleged moral difference between sedation therapy and euthanasia.
Collapse
|
15
|
Rath J, Ischi M, Perkins D. Evolution of different dual-use concepts in international and national law and its implications on research ethics and governance. Sci Eng Ethics 2014; 20:769-790. [PMID: 24497004 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9519-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2013] [Accepted: 01/20/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
This paper provides an overview of the various dual-use concepts applied in national and international non-proliferation and anti-terrorism legislation, such as the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, the Chemical Weapons Convention and United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540, and national export control legislation and in relevant codes of conduct. While there is a vast literature covering dual-use concepts in particular with regard to life sciences, this is the first paper that incorporates into such discussion the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1540. In addition, recent developments such as the extension of dual-use export control legislation in the area of human rights protection are also identified and reviewed. The discussion of dual-use concepts is hereby undertaken in the context of human- and/or national-security-based approaches to security. This paper discusses four main concepts of dual use as applied today in international and national law: civilian versus military, peaceful versus non-peaceful, legitimate versus illegitimate and benevolent versus malevolent. In addition, the usage of the term to describe positive technology spin-offs between civilian and military applications is also briefly addressed. Attention is also given to the roles civil society and research ethics may play in the governance of dual-use sciences and technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Rath
- Department Integrative Zoologie, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Australian end-of-life care, practicing euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide is illegal. Despite this, death hastening practices are common across medical settings. Practices can be clandestine or overt but in many instances physicians are forced to seek protection behind ambiguous medico-legal imperatives such as the Principle of Double Effect. Moreover, the way they conceptualise and experience such practices is inconsistent. To complement the available statistical data, the purpose of this study was to understand the reasoning behind how and why physicians in Australia will hasten death. METHOD A qualitative investigation was focused on palliative and critical/acute settings. A thematic analysis was conducted on semi-structured in-depth interviews with 13 specialist physicians. Attention was given to eliciting meanings and experiences in Australian end-of-life care. RESULTS Highlighting the importance of a multidimensional approach, physicians negotiated multiple influences when death was regarded as hastened. The way they understood and experienced end-of-life care practices were affected by politico-religious and cultural influences, medico-legal imperatives, and personal values and beliefs. Interpersonal and intrapsychic aspects further emphasised the emotional and psychological investment physicians have with patients and others. In most cases death occurred as a result of treating suffering, and sometimes to fulfil the wishes of patients and others who requested death. Experience was especially subject to the efficacy with which physicians negotiated complex but context-specific situations, and was reflective of how they considered a good death. Although many were compelled to draw on the Principle of Double Effect, every physician reported its inadequacy as a medico-legal guideline. CONCLUSIONS The Principle of Double Effect, as a simplistic and generalised guideline, was identified as a convenient mechanism to protect physicians who inadvertently or intentionally hastened death. But its narrow focus on the physician's intent illuminated how easily it may be manipulated, thus impairing transparency and a physician's capacity for honesty. It is suggested the concept of "force majeure" be examined for its applicability in Australian medical end-of-life law where, consistent with a multidimensional and complex world, a physician's motivations can also be understood in terms of the emotional and psychological pressures they face in situations that hasten death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven A Trankle
- Centre for Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clark PM. Defining the scope of Casey and Salzman's application of the rule of double effect to the therapeutic and prophylactic uses of combined oral contraceptives. Am J Bioeth 2014; 14:35-38. [PMID: 24978408 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.922369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
|
18
|
Howe EG. New approaches with surrogate decision makers. J Clin Ethics 2014; 25:261-272. [PMID: 25517562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
A first principle in ethics consultation is that reasoning is essential. A second principle is that the religious and cultural views of patients and their surrogates are usually respected. What can be done when these principles collide-when patients or surrogates have religious or cultural views and beliefs that clinicians find unreasonable or even offensive? Mediation may provide some approaches to assist us in providing the most ethically appropriate assistance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund G Howe
- Programs in Medical Ethics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814 USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lucke J. The prophylactic effects of intentional contraception. Am J Bioeth 2014; 14:38-39. [PMID: 24978409 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.918207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jayne Lucke
- a LaTrobe University and University of Queensland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Casey MJ, Salzman TA. Therapeutic, prophylactic, untoward, and contraceptive effects of combined oral contraceptives: catholic teaching, natural law, and the principle of double effect when deciding to prescribe and use. Am J Bioeth 2014; 14:20-34. [PMID: 24978407 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.919364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Combined oral contraceptives (COC) have been demonstrated to have significant benefits for the treatment and prevention of disease. These medications also are associated with untoward health effects, and they may be directly contraceptive. Prescribers and users must compare and weigh the intended beneficial health effects against foreseeable but unintended possible adverse effects in their decisions to prescribe and use. Additionally, those who intend to abide by Catholic teachings must consider prohibitions against contraception. Ethical judgments concerning both health benefits and contraception are approached in this essay through an overview of the therapeutic, prophylactic, untoward, and contraceptive effects of COC and discussion of magisterial and traditional Catholic teachings from natural law. Discerning through the principle of double effect, proportionate reason, and evidence gathered from the sciences, medical and moral conclusions are drawn that we believe to be fully compliant with good medicine and Catholic teaching.
Collapse
|
21
|
|
22
|
Di Nucci E. Contraception and double effect. Am J Bioeth 2014; 14:42-43. [PMID: 24978411 DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2014.918205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
|
23
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Wilkinson
- Department of Neonatal Medicine, Women's and Children's Hospital, 72 King William Rd, North Adelaide 5006, South Australia, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Capitaine L, Devolder K, Pennings G. Lifespan extension and the doctrine of double effect. Theor Med Bioeth 2013; 34:207-226. [PMID: 23686728 DOI: 10.1007/s11017-013-9257-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Recent developments in biogerontology--the study of the biology of ageing--suggest that it may eventually be possible to intervene in the human ageing process. This, in turn, offers the prospect of significantly postponing the onset of age-related diseases. The biogerontological project, however, has met with strong resistance, especially by deontologists. They consider the act of intervening in the ageing process impermissible on the grounds that it would (most probably) bring about an extended maximum lifespan--a state of affairs that they deem intrinsically bad. In a bid to convince their deontological opponents of the permissibility of this act, proponents of biogerontology invoke an argument which is grounded in the doctrine of double effect. Surprisingly, their argument, which we refer to as the 'double effect argument', has gone unnoticed. This article exposes and critically evaluates this 'double effect argument'. To this end, we first review a series of excerpts from the ethical debate on biogerontology in order to substantiate the presence of double effect reasoning. Next, we attempt to determine the role that the 'double effect argument' is meant to fulfil within this debate. Finally, we assess whether the act of intervening in ageing actually can be justified using double effect reasoning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Capitaine
- Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Douglas CD, Kerridge IH, Ankeny RA. Narratives of 'terminal sedation', and the importance of the intention-foresight distinction in palliative care practice. Bioethics 2013; 27:1-11. [PMID: 21726263 DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01895.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
The moral importance of the 'intention-foresight' distinction has long been a matter of philosophical controversy, particularly in the context of end-of-life care. Previous empirical research in Australia has suggested that general physicians and surgeons may use analgesic or sedative infusions with ambiguous intentions, their actions sometimes approximating 'slow euthanasia'. In this paper, we report findings from a qualitative study of 18 Australian palliative care medical specialists, using in-depth interviews to address the use of sedation at the end of life. The majority of subjects were agnostic or atheistic. In contrast to their colleagues in acute medical practice, these Australian palliative care specialists were almost unanimously committed to distinguishing their actions from euthanasia. This commitment appeared to arise principally from the need to maintain a clear professional role, and not obviously from an ideological opposition to euthanasia. While some respondents acknowledged that there are difficult cases that require considered reflection upon one's intention, and where there may be some 'mental gymnastics,' the nearly unanimous view was that it is important, even in these difficult cases, to cultivate an intention that focuses exclusively on the relief of symptoms. We present four narratives of 'terminal' sedation--cases where sedation was administered in significant doses just before death, and may well have hastened death. Considerable ambiguities of intention were evident in some instances, but the discussion around these clearly exceptional cases illustrates the importance of intention to palliative care specialists in maintaining their professional roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles D Douglas
- University of Newcastle, Clinical Ethics and Health Law, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Janssens R, van Delden JJM, Widdershoven GAM. Palliative sedation: not just normal medical practice. Ethical reflections on the Royal Dutch Medical Association's guideline on palliative sedation. J Med Ethics 2012; 38:664-668. [PMID: 22811556 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
The main premise of the Royal Dutch Medical Association's (RDMA) guideline on palliative sedation is that palliative sedation, contrary to euthanasia, is normal medical practice. Although we do not deny the ethical distinctions between euthanasia and palliative sedation, we will critically analyse the guideline's argumentation strategy with which euthanasia is demarcated from palliative sedation. First, we will analyse the guideline's main premise, which entails that palliative sedation is normal medical treatment. After this, we will critically discuss three crucial propositions of the guideline that are used to support this premise: (1) the patient's life expectancy should not exceed 2 weeks; (2) the aim of the physician should be to relieve suffering and (3) expert consultation is optional. We will conclude that, if inherent problematic aspects of palliative sedation are taken seriously, palliative sedation is less normal than it is now depicted in the guideline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rien Janssens
- Department of Medical Humanities, EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
This article applies the anthropological concept of liminality to reconceptualize palliative care ethics. Liminality possesses both spatial and temporal dimensions. Both these aspects are analyzed to provide insight into the intersubjective relationship between patient and caregiver in the context of palliative care. Aristotelian practical wisdom, or phronesis, is considered to be the appropriate model for palliative care ethics, provided it is able to account for liminality. Moreover, this article argues for the importance of liminality for providing an ethical structure that grounds the doctrine of double effect and overcomes the impasse of phronesis in the treatment of the terminally ill.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillel Braude
- Faculty of Religious Studies, McGill University, 3520 University Street, Montreal, QC, H3A 2A7, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Macauley R. The role of the principle of double effect in ethics education at US medical schools and its potential impact on pain management at the end of life. J Med Ethics 2012; 38:174-178. [PMID: 21947800 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Because opioids can suppress respiratory drive, the principle of double effect (PDE) has been used to justify their use for terminally ill patients. Recent studies, however, suggest that the risk of respiratory depression in typical end-of-life (EOL) situations may be overstated and that heightened concern for this rare occurrence can lead to inadequate treatment of pain. The purpose of this study is to examine the role of the PDE in medical school ethics education, with specific reference to its potential impact on pain management at EOL. METHOD After obtaining institutional review board approval, an electronic survey was sent to ethics educators at every allopathic medical school in the USA. RESULTS One-third of ethics educators felt that opioids were 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death. Educators' opinions of opioid effects did not influence their view of the relevance of the PDE, with approximately 70% deeming it relevant to EOL care. Only 15% of ethics educators believed that associating the PDE with opioid use might discourage clinicians from optimally treating pain, out of concern for respiratory depression. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that a significant minority of ethics educators believe, contrary to current evidence, that opioids are 'likely' to cause significant respiratory depression that could hasten death in terminally ill patients. Yet, many of those who do not feel this is likely still rely on the PDE to justify this possibility, potentially (and unknowingly) contributing to clinical misperceptions and underutilisation of opioids at EOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Macauley
- Department of Clinical Ethics, Fletcher Allen Health Care, 111 Colchester Avenue, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
de la Brière A, Tocheport P. [Changing the collective impression of palliative care]. Soins 2011:34-37. [PMID: 22003790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The general public and health professionals may have a mistaken impression of palliative care and the Leonetti law. Thanks to training and information on the measures taken by the government with regard to the development of palliative care, the palliative culture is gradually becoming integrated into healthcare structures and mentalities.
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
As media reports have made widely known, in November 2009, the ethics committee of St. Joseph's Hospital in Phoenix, Arizona, permitted the abortion of an eleven-week-old fetus in order to save the life of its mother. This woman was suffering from acute pulmonary hypertension, which her doctors judged would prove fatal for both her and her previable child. The ethics committee believed abortion to be permitted in this case under the so-called principle of double effect, but Thomas J. Olmsted, the bishop of Phoenix, disagreed with the committee and pronounced its chair, Sister Margaret McBride, excommunicated latae sententiae, "by the very commission of the act." In this article, I take the much discussed Phoenix case as an occasion to subject the principle of double effect to another round of philosophical scrutiny. In particular, I examine the third condition of the principle in its textbook formulation, namely, that the evil effect in question may not be the means to the good effect. My argument, in brief, is that the textbook formulation of the principle does not withstand philosophical scrutiny. Nevertheless, in the end, I do not claim that we should then "do away" with the principle altogether. Instead, we do well to understand it within the context of casuistry, the tradition of moral reasoning from which it issued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernard G Prusak
- Center for Liberal Education, Villanova University, 800 Lancaster Ave., Villanova, PA 19085, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The rule of double effect is regularly invoked in ethical discussions about palliative sedation, terminal extubation and other clinical acts that may be viewed as hastening death for imminently dying patients. Unfortunately, the literature tends to employ this useful principle in a fashion suggesting that it offers the final word on the moral acceptability of such medical procedures. In fact, the rule cannot be applied appropriately without invoking moral theories that are not explicit in the rule itself. Four tenets of the rule each require their own ethical justification. A variety of moral theories are relevant to making judgements in a pluralistic society. Much of the rich moral conversation germane to the rule has been reflected in arguments about physician-assisted suicide and voluntary active euthanasia, but the rule itself has limited relevance to these debates, and requires its own moral justifications when applied to other practices that might hasten death.
Collapse
|
32
|
Figueroa G R. [To kill, let die and euthanasia in the bill of rights of patients and in the Chilean doctrine]. Rev Med Chil 2011; 139:655-659. [PMID: 22051718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The Bill of Rights for Patients provides the patient with autonomy for disposing of his life, enabling him to reject those treatments that unnecessarily prolong his life. However, the bill does not allow an artificial acceleration of death. Therefore, the bill does not permit euthanasia (at least, certain form of it) nor assisted-suicide. However, according to the practice of medicine and also Chilean doctrine, it is permitted to inject morphine to a patient to relieve his pain, even though that could hasten his death. In consequence, it is allowed for the patient to dispose of his life and also to inject in him morphine for pain relief, endangering his life, but neither euthanasia nor assisted-suicide is allowed. Is this coherent? According to Chilean doctrine, it could be coherent under the condition of accepting the distinction between killing and letting die and also the double effect doctrine. The problem is that there is abundant English literature in the realm of moral philosophy to disregard both conditions. Therefore, it is possible to claim that the Bill is not coherent and that the Chilean doctrine is based upon a distinction and a doctrine that are not acceptable.
Collapse
|
33
|
Mailly M, Bourrié D, Escassut P, Cadilhac MB, Guldner E. [The principle of double effect in palliative care]. Soins 2011:45-46. [PMID: 21574315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Caregivers sometimes feel powerless in complex end-of-life situations. Some therapies used to relieve the patient can have the effect of shortening the patient's life. This is why it is essential to explain clearly the principle known as the double effect.
Collapse
|
34
|
[Indirect euthanasia from the ethical viewpoint]. Neuere Med Wiss Quellen Stud 2011; 27:117-68. [PMID: 21999017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
|
35
|
Rothrauff TC, Abraham AJ, Bride BE, Roman PM. Occupational turnover intentions among substance abuse counselors. J Subst Abuse Treat 2010; 40:67-76. [PMID: 20947285 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2010.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2010] [Revised: 08/09/2010] [Accepted: 08/25/2010] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
This study examined predictor, moderator, and mediator variables of occupational turnover intention (OcTI) among substance abuse counselors. Data were obtained via questionnaires from 929 counselors working in 225 private substance abuse treatment (SAT) programs across the United States. Hierarchical multiple regression models were conducted to assess predictor, moderator, and mediator variables of OcTI. OcTI scores were relatively low on a 7-point scale, indicating that very few counselors definitely intended to leave the SAT field. Age, certification, positive perceptions of procedural and distributive justice, and hospital-based status negatively predicted OcTI. Counselors' substance use disorder-impacted history moderated the association between organizational commitment and OcTI. Organizational turnover intention partially mediated the link between organizational commitment and OcTI. Workforce stability might be achieved by promoting perceptions of advantages to working in a particular treatment program, having organizational commitment, showing appreciation for counselors' work, and valuing employees from diverse backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanja C Rothrauff
- Institute for Behavioral Research, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-2401, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Keuleyan E. Liberty to decide on dual use biomedical research: an acknowledged necessity. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:43-58. [PMID: 18427955 PMCID: PMC7089121 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9064-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2007] [Accepted: 03/27/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Humanity entered the twenty-first century with revolutionary achievements in biomedical research. At the same time multiple "dual-use" results have been published. The battle against infectious diseases is meeting new challenges, with newly emerging and re-emerging infections. Both natural disaster epidemics, such as SARS, avian influenza, haemorrhagic fevers, XDR and MDR tuberculosis and many others, and the possibility of intentional mis-use, such as letters containing anthrax spores in USA, 2001, have raised awareness of the real threats. Many great men, including Goethe, Spinoza, J.B. Shaw, Fr. Engels, J.F. Kennedy and others, have recognized that liberty is also a responsibility. That is why the liberty to decide now represents an acknowledged necessity: biomedical research should be supported, conducted and published with appropriate measures to prevent potential "dual use". Biomedical scientists should work according to the ethical principles of their Code of Conduct, an analogue of Hippocrates Oath of doctors; and they should inform government, society and their juniors about the problem. National science consulting boards of experts should be created to prepare guidelines and control the problem at state level. An international board should develop minimum standards to be applicable by each country. Bio-preparedness is considered another key-measure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Keuleyan
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Medical Institute, Ministry of the Interior, Sofia 1606, Bulgaria.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Adamis D, Treloar A, Martin FC, Macdonald AJD. Ethical research in delirium: arguments for including decisionally incapacitated subjects. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:169-174. [PMID: 19247810 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9120-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2008] [Accepted: 01/28/2009] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Here we describe how more important findings were obtained in a delirium study by using an informal assessment of mental capacity, and, in those who lacked capacity, obtaining consent later when or if capacity returned or a proxy was found. From a total of 233 patients 23 patients lacked capacity as judged by our informal capacity judgment and 210 did not. Of those who lacked capacity, 13 agreed to enter in the study. Six of them regained capacity later. When these 13 participants were excluded from analysis, significant findings were no longer evident. These results show that by the inclusion of subjects who lacked capacity the results of analyses of the condition from whish they suffer are altered. We suggest that this approach to the study of delirium is more ethical than the usual system of strict exclusion of people who lack capacity to give consent and for whom assent is not available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Adamis
- Research and Academic Institute of Athens, 27 Themistokleous Street & Akadimias, Athens 106 77, Greece.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Koepsell D. On genies and bottles: scientists' moral responsibility and dangerous technology R&D. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:119-33. [PMID: 19644770 PMCID: PMC2832882 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9158-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2009] [Accepted: 07/21/2009] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
The age-old maxim of scientists whose work has resulted in deadly or dangerous technologies is: scientists are not to blame, but rather technologists and politicians must be morally culpable for the uses of science. As new technologies threaten not just populations but species and biospheres, scientists should reassess their moral culpability when researching fields whose impact may be catastrophic. Looking at real-world examples such as smallpox research and the Australian "mousepox trick", and considering fictional or future technologies like Kurt Vonnegut's "ice-nine" from Cat's Cradle, and the "grey goo" scenario in nanotechnology, this paper suggests how ethical principles developed in biomedicine can be adjusted for science in general. An "extended moral horizon" may require looking not just to the effects of research on individual human subjects, but also to effects on humanity as a whole. Moreover, a crude utilitarian calculus can help scientists make moral decisions about which technologies to pursue and disseminate when catastrophes may result. Finally, institutions should be devised to teach these moral principles to scientists, and require moral education for future funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Koepsell
- Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Technology, Policy, and Management, Delft University of Technology, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Abstract
UNESCO is an intergovernmental organization with 193 Member States. It is concerned with a broad range of issues regarding education, science and culture. It is the only UN organisation with a mandate in science. Since 1993 it is addressing ethics of science and technology, with special emphasis on bioethics. One major objective of the ethics programme is the development of international normative standards. This is particularly important since many Member States only have a limited infrastructure in bioethics, lacking expertise, educational programs, bioethics committees and legal frameworks. UNESCO has recently adopted the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights. The focus of current activities is now on implementation of this Declaration. Three activities are discussed that aim at improving and reinforcing the ethics infrastructure in relation to science and technology: the Global Ethics Observatory, the Ethics Education Programme and the Assisting Bioethics Committees project.
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
The technological advances of the 20th century resulted in the creation of the Internet and its introduction into everyday life on a global scale. The Internet provides access to information and the sale and purchase of goods. Medications are also subject to trade. Their sale is conducted by online pharmacies and their global turnover amounts to hundreds of billions of dollars. Medications ordered over the Internet are sent by mail all over the world. Considering the events of recent years, we cannot exclude the risk of a terrorist attack through online pharmacies. Terrorists can establish such companies, legally or illegally, or acquire ones already existing. Parcels, which are highly trusted by the customers of online pharmacies, can, for example, be contaminated with dangerous materials. The sale of online medications in the international system is potentially dangerous and requires international regulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sławomir Letkiewicz
- Katowice School of Economics, Harcerzy Września 3, 40-659 Katowice, Piotrowice, Poland.
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ross A, Athanassoulis N. The social nature of engineering and its implications for risk taking. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:147-168. [PMID: 19350417 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9125-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2008] [Accepted: 03/18/2009] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Making decisions with an, often significant, element of risk seems to be an integral part of many of the projects of the diverse profession of engineering. Whether it be decisions about the design of products, manufacturing processes, public works, or developing technological solutions to environmental, social and global problems, risk taking seems inherent to the profession. Despite this, little attention has been paid to the topic and specifically to how our understanding of engineering as a distinctive profession might affect how we should make decisions under risk. This paper seeks to remedy this, firstly by offering a nuanced account of risk and then by considering how specific claims about our understanding of engineering as a social profession, with corresponding social values and obligations, should inform how we make decisions about risk in this context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Ross
- Centre for Professional Ethics, Keele University, Keele ST5 5BG, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
Biological research with legitimate scientific purpose that may be misused to pose a biological threat to public health and/or national security is termed dual use. In Poland there are adequate conditions for conducting experiments that could be qualified as dual use research, and therefore, a risk of attack on Poland or other countries exists. Optimal solutions for limiting such threats are required, and the national system of biosecurity should enable early, reliable, and complete identification of this type of research. Scientists should have a fundamental role in this process, their duty being to immediately, upon identification, report research with dual use potential. An important entity in the identification system of dual use research should also be the Central Register of Biological and Biomedical Research, which gathers information about all biological and biomedical research being conducted in a given country. Publishers, editors, and review committees of journals and other scientific publications should be involved in evaluating results of clinical trials. The National Council of Biosecurity should be the governmental institution responsible for developing a system of dual use research threat prevention. Its role would be to develop codes of conduct, form counsel of expertise, and monitor the problem at national level, while the Dual Use Research Committee would be responsible for individual cases. In Poland, current actions aiming to provide biological safety were based on developing and passing an act about genetically modified organisms (GMO's) and creating a GMO Committee. Considering experiences of other nations, one should view these actions as fragmentary, and thus insufficient protection against dual use research threats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marek Czarkowski
- Department of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1A, 02-097 Warsaw, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
The advancement of science and the dilemma of dual use: why we can't afford to fail. Proceedings of a conference. November 9-10, 2007. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:1-215. [PMID: 20593547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
|
44
|
Spier RE. "Dual use" and "intentionality": seeking to prevent the manifestation of deliberately harmful objectives: A summary and some reflections on 'The Advancement of Science and the Dilemma of Dual Use: Why We Can't Afford to Fail'. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:1-6. [PMID: 19798590 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9169-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
|
45
|
Lekka-Kowalik A. Why science cannot be value-free: understanding the rationality and responsibility of science. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:33-41. [PMID: 19343542 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-009-9128-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2008] [Accepted: 03/18/2009] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Against the ideal of value-free science I argue that science is not--and cannot be--value-free and that relevant values are both cognitive and moral. I develop an argument by indicating various aspects of the value-ladenness of science. The recognition of the value-ladenness of science requires rethinking our understanding of the rationality and responsibility of science. Its rationality cannot be seen as merely instrumental--as it was seen by the ideal of value-free science--for this would result in limiting the autonomy of science and reducing scientists to "minds to hire". The scientific rationality must be seen as practical rationality which takes into account the full horizon of values. The scientific responsibility must also be broaden in scope and type. On this basis I draw three practical conclusions concerning the organization of research and training of young scientists, appealing to Plato's claim that those most capable of healing are also those most capable of harming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Lekka-Kowalik
- Department of Philosophy, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14, 20-950 Lublin, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Abstract
This paper argues that the current stock of anti-personnel cluster bombs are temporally indiscriminate, and, therefore, unjust weapons. The paper introduces and explains the idea of temporal indiscriminateness. It argues that to honor non-combatant immunity-in addition to not targeting civilians-one must adequately target combatants. Due to their high dud rate, cluster submunitions fail to target combatants with sufficient temporal accuracy, and, thereby, result in avoidable serious harm to non-combatants. The paper concludes that non-combatant immunity and the principle of discrimination require a moratorium on the use of current cluster munitions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Cavanaugh
- Department of Philosophy, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94117-1080, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Friedman D, Rager-Zisman B, Bibi E, Keynan A. The bioterrorism threat and dual-use biotechnological research: an Israeli perspective. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:85-97. [PMID: 18563629 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9075-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2007] [Accepted: 05/28/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Israel has a long history of concern with chemical and biological threats, since several hostile states in the Middle East are likely to possess such weapons. The Twin-Tower terrorist attacks and Anthrax envelope scares of 2001 were a watershed for public perceptions of the threat of unconventional terror in general and of biological terror in particular. New advances in biotechnology will only increase the ability of terrorists to exploit the burgeoning availability of related information to develop ever-more destructive bioweapons. Many areas of modern biological research are unavoidably dual-use by nature. They thus have a great potential for both help and harm; and facilitating the former while preventing the latter remains a serious challenge to researchers and governments alike. This article addresses how Israel might best (1) prevent hostile elements from obtaining, from Israel's biological research system, materials, information and technologies that might facilitate their carrying out a biological attack, while (2) continuing to promote academic openness, excellence and other hallmarks of that system. This important and sensitive issue was assessed by a special national committee, and their recommendations are presented and discussed. One particularly innovative element is the restructuring and use of Israel's extensive biosafety system to also address biosecurity goals, with minimal disruption or delay.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Friedman
- Institute for National Security Studies, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Abstract
The term dual use technologies refers to research and technology with the potential both to yield valuable scientific knowledge and to be used for nefarious purposes with serious consequences for public health or the environment. There are two main approaches to assessing dual use technologies: pragmatic and metaphysical. A pragmatic approach relies on ethical principles and norms to generate specific guidance and policy for dual use technologies. A metaphysical approach exhorts us to the deeper study of human nature, our intentions, goals, values ideals and social relations when considering dual use technology. Use of science and technology (S and T) is determined by two components of human nature: human intentions and choices. We have drawn a distinction between specific measures, goals and intentions with respect to technologies in order to show that moral judgment about technologies must precede their use. Understanding of our intentionality and values, and our moral ideals, as a measurable, tangible part of the real world is important for the prevention of any possible harm from S and T. In the context of dual use technologies, we stress the importance of three main understandings of human nature: vulnerability, responsibility and narrative identity. These can become a strong ontological "antidote" to technology's poisoning of modern man. Each new technology can be measured and compared with man's values, traditions and societal norms. This can be done bearing in mind the concept that human nature is not dualistic, but pluralistic. A system of ethical principles that includes the principles of good intentions, the correspondence of goals and means, the balancing of risks and benefits, simplicity, and contextuality, will help ensure that technologies are more humanistic and friendly to human beings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Svitlana V Pustovit
- Philosophy Department, National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education named after P. L. Shupyk, Dorogozhits'ka 9, Kiev 04112, Ukraine.
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
While there has been much interest in this topic, no generally accepted definition of dual use has been forthcoming. As a contribution to this issue, it is maintained that three related kinds of things comprise the category of dual use: research, technologies and artefacts. In regard to all three kinds, difficulties are identified in making clear distinctions between those that are and are not dual use. It is suggested that our classification should take account of actual capacities and willingness to make use of these objects for 'bad ends' and not the mere possibility that this could be done, and here three 'contextual factors' are identified. A (provisional) definition is proposed that takes account of threats and risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Forge
- Unit for History and Philosophy of Science, Sydney University, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Kant L, Mourya DT. Managing dual use technology: it takes two to tango. Sci Eng Ethics 2010; 16:77-83. [PMID: 18438721 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-008-9062-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2008] [Accepted: 03/27/2008] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
Like nuclear energy, most technologies could have dual use-for health and well being and disaster and terror. Some research publications have brought to the forefront the tragic consequences of the latter potential through their possible use. Monitoring life science research and development (R&D) to prevent possible misuse is a challenging task globally, more so in developing economies like India, which are emerging as major biotech hubs. As a signatory to the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention, India has put in motion a process of evolving a series of measures to manage dual-use technology. The Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) has taken a lead in drafting model codes of conduct, ethics and practice for use by other S&T agencies to tailor them as per their requirements. Taking cue from the discussions held by the editors of the various medical and science journals in the developed world, the Indian Journal of Medical Research, the official publication of the ICMR, is working on policy and uniform practice of publication of dual-use research results. The Government of India too has promulgated legal provisions to minimize the risks of misuse of technology, like the Weapons of Mass Destruction Act. Clearly, no single agency would be able to manage the dual-use of technology effectively. Multiple agencies have to come together to work in tandem for effective implementation of various measure and also like Janus, ensure that they are neither too restrictive nor intrusive to discourage the development of science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lalit Kant
- Indian Council of Medical Research, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi 110029, India
| | | |
Collapse
|