1
|
Rosenvilde JJ, Lauritsen J, Bandak M, Wagner T, Agerbæk M, Dysager L, Aagaard M, Daugaard G. Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lumpectomy in Patients with Nonseminoma Testicular Cancer: A Nationwide Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(23)00293-6. [PMID: 38199869 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Revised: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Optimal treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic nonseminoma testicular cancer are achieved with chemotherapy and subsequent surgery in cases with residual tumor. In Denmark, postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lumpectomy (RPLP) is performed in patients with residual tumors >1 cm. There is a need to clarify whether this surgical method provides acceptable treatment results. Our objective was to describe morbidity and oncological outcomes of postchemotherapy RPLP. METHODS This was a retrospective population-based multicenter study including patients with nonseminoma testicular cancer and postchemotherapy RPLP performed in Denmark between 1990 and 2015. A total of 219 patients were eligible, with median follow-up of 19 yr. Postoperative complications were evaluated according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. The cumulative incidence of recurrence inside or outside the borders of a bilateral surgical template, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS After median follow-up of 19 yr, 31/219 patients (14%) experienced a surgical complication, of which 5% were Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III. In total, 37 patients experienced a recurrence. The 5-yr, 10-yr, and 20-yr cumulative risk of recurrence inside a bilateral template was 4.3%, 5.9%, and 5.9%, respectively. The 10-yr PFS rate was 83% and the 10-yr overall survival rate was 96%. The main limitation of the study is the retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS With few patients experiencing a major postoperative complication and a 10-yr cumulative rate of 5.9% for recurrence inside a bilateral surgical template, postchemotherapy RPLP appears to be a safe alternative to template surgery for disseminated nonseminoma. PATIENT SUMMARY We looked at minimal surgery to remove tumor tissue remaining after chemotherapy in patients with testicular cancer. We found a low frequency of complications, tumor recurrence, and death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jakob Lauritsen
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mikkel Bandak
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Thomas Wagner
- Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Mads Agerbæk
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lars Dysager
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Mikael Aagaard
- Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gedske Daugaard
- Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital-Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gerdtsson A, Torisson G, Thor A, Grenabo Bergdahl A, Almås B, Håkansson U, Törnblom M, Negaard HFS, Glimelius I, Halvorsen D, Karlsdóttir Á, Haugnes HS, Larsen SM, Holmberg G, Wahlqvist R, Tandstad T, Cohn-Cedermark G, Ståhl O, Kjellman A. Validation of a prediction model for post-chemotherapy fibrosis in nonseminoma patients. BJU Int 2023; 132:329-336. [PMID: 37129962 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To validate Vergouwe's prediction model using the Swedish and Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group (SWENOTECA) RETROP database and to define its clinical utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS Vergouwe's prediction model for benign histopathology in post-chemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) uses the following variables: presence of teratoma in orchiectomy specimen; pre-chemotherapy level of alpha-fetoprotein; β-Human chorionic gonadotropin and lactate dehydrogenase; and lymph node size pre- and post-chemotherapy. Our validation cohort consisted of patients included in RETROP, a prospective population-based database of patients in Sweden and Norway with metastatic nonseminoma, who underwent PC-RPLND in the period 2007-2014. Discrimination and calibration analyses were used to validate Vergouwe's prediction model results. Calibration plots were created and a Hosmer-Lemeshow test was calculated. Clinical utility, expressed as opt-out net benefit (NBopt-out ), was analysed using decision curve analysis. RESULTS Overall, 284 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 130 (46%) had benign histology after PC-RPLND. Discrimination analysis showed good reproducibility, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.77-0.87) compared to Vergouwe's prediction model (AUC between 0.77 and 0.84). Calibration was acceptable with no recalibration. Using a prediction threshold of 70% for benign histopathology, NBopt-out was 0.098. Using the model and this threshold, 61 patients would have been spared surgery. However, only 51 of 61 were correctly classified as benign. CONCLUSIONS The model was externally validated with good reproducibility. In a clinical setting, the model may identify patients with a high chance of benign histopathology, thereby sparing patients of surgery. However, meticulous follow-up is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Gerdtsson
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Gustav Torisson
- Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anna Thor
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Grenabo Bergdahl
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenborg, Sweden
| | - Bjarte Almås
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Magnus Törnblom
- Section of Urology, Department of Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Visby County Hospital, Visby, Sweden
| | | | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Dag Halvorsen
- Department of Urology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Ása Karlsdóttir
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Hege Sagstuen Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | | | - Göran Holmberg
- Department of Urology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenborg, Sweden
| | - Rolf Wahlqvist
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, The Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Ståhl
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Anders Kjellman
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
King JM, Cheng M, Kesler K, Ashkar R, Althouse SK, Hanna NH, Einhorn LH, Adra N. Management of Residual Nonretroperitoneal Disease in Postchemotherapy Nonseminomatous Germ-Cell Tumors. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3939-3944. [PMID: 36758196 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02205] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The majority of patients with advanced nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor are cured with combination chemotherapy and surgical resection of residual disease when appropriate. In patients with both retroperitoneal (RP) and non-RP postchemotherapy residual disease, management of the non-RP disease is typically guided by pathologic findings at the time of RP resection. There are limited data to help guide management decisions in patients with non-RP postchemotherapy residual disease alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS The prospectively maintained Indiana University testicular cancer database was queried for patients with metastatic nonseminomatous germ-cell tumor treated between 1990 and 2021 who had residual non-RP disease in the absence of residual RP disease after completing either first-line or salvage chemotherapy. RESULTS One hundred twenty-nine patients met eligibility and were included in this analysis. Seventy-five patients had teratoma in the primary tumor site, while 54 did not. Of those with teratoma in the primary, 55% had at least one postchemotherapy non-RP surgical specimen with teratomatous elements compared with 17% of those without teratoma in the primary (P < .001). Of those without teratoma in the primary site, 56% had at least one postchemotherapy non-RP surgical specimen with active germ-cell tumor compared with 31% of those with teratoma in the primary (P = .0046). CONCLUSION The presence of teratoma in the primary tumor site is associated with a higher rate of teratoma in postchemotherapy residual non-RP disease. Patients without teratoma in the primary tumor should still be considered for resection of residual postchemotherapy disease that could harbor teratoma or active germ-cell tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer M King
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Michael Cheng
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Kenneth Kesler
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Ryan Ashkar
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Sandra K Althouse
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nasser H Hanna
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Lawrence H Einhorn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Nabil Adra
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gilligan TD. Resection of Residual Masses After Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors in Adolescents and Adults. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:3899-3904. [PMID: 37410968 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00654] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Optimal treatment of patients with testicular germ cell tumors requires a coordinated multidisciplinary approach, so that surgery, chemotherapy, and, when appropriate, radiation therapy can be integrated into a coherent and comprehensive treatment plan. Nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) are often a mixture of teratoma and cancer (choriocarcinoma, embryonal carcinoma, seminoma, and/or yolk sac tumor). While the cancers are highly sensitive to and often cured by chemotherapy, teratoma is resistant to chemotherapy and radiation therapy and generally must be resected surgically to be successfully treated. Therefore, the standard of care for metastatic NSGCT is to resect all resectable residual masses after chemotherapy. If such resection reveals only teratoma and/or necrosis/fibrosis, then patients are put on a surveillance schedule to monitor for relapse. If viable cancer is found and there are positive margins or 10% or more of any of the residual masses consists of viable cancer, then two cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Testicular cancer is a curable cancer. The success of physicians in curing the disease is underpinned by multidisciplinary advances. Cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy and the refinement of post-chemotherapy surgical procedures and diagnostic strategies have greatly improved long term survival in most patients. Despite such excellent outcomes, several controversial dilemmas exist in the approaches to clinical stage I disease, salvage chemotherapy, post-chemotherapy surgical procedures, and implementing innovative imaging studies. Relapse after salvage chemotherapy has a poor prognosis and the optimal treatment is not apparent. Recent research has provided insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying cisplatin resistance. Phase 2 studies with targeted agents have failed to show adequate efficacy; however, our understanding of cisplatin resistant disease is rapidly expanding. This review summarizes recent advances and discusses relevant issues in the biology and management of testicular cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Comenius University, National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Liang Cheng
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Lifespan Academic Medical Center, Providence, RI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
RATIONALE Germ cell tumors in the head and neck are very rare. In cases of germ cell tumors, it is uncommon for lymph node metastasis to be the only and initial symptom, and this can easily lead to a misdiagnosis. Herein, we report about a 28-year-old woman with lymph node metastasis, in whom a primary tumor appeared in the nasal cavity. PATIENT CONCERNS A 28-year-old woman presented with enlarged left submandibular lymph nodes. No other mass was found on whole-body screening using positron emission tomography-computed tomography. DIAGNOSIS After partial submandibular lymphadenectomy was performed, histopathological and immunohistochemical examinations revealed a metastatic germ cell tumor. However, it was difficult to further classify and affirm the origin. INTERVENTIONS As the patient was receiving four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy, a primary tumor emerged in the nasal cavity, which was finally confirmed as an immature teratoma of a high World Health Organization histological grade and Norris grade 3. This tumor was found to contain similar components to lymph nodes with respect to histopathological and immunohistochemical characteristics, especially the immature neural tubes or nervous tissue in the nasal cavity. Fortunately, the patient recovered well with no signs of relapse, and the size of residual lymph nodes remained unchanged after she received another four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin chemotherapy and two cycles of doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) chemotherapy. OUTCOMES Unfortunately, 11 months later, during the coronavirus disease pandemic, the patient died owing to respiratory failure and pulmonary infection. CONCLUSIONS In cases of malignant tumor in the submandibular lymph nodes of adults, the metastasis of a germ cell tumor should be considered an important differential diagnosis even if a primary tumor does not emerge. In this case, adequate postoperative chemotherapy is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Guo
- Department of Pathology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hongbing Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Heshun Xia
- Department of Pathology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hongwei Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Peng Xu
- Department of Digestive and Respiratory, Shiyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China
- *Correspondence: Guoliang Pi, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China (e-mail: ) and Peng Xu, Department of Digestive and Respiratory, Shiyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China (e-mail: )
| | - Guoliang Pi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- *Correspondence: Guoliang Pi, Department of Radiation Oncology, Hubei Cancer Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430079, China (e-mail: ) and Peng Xu, Department of Digestive and Respiratory, Shiyan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|