Clinical efficacy of intravesical electrical stimulation on detrusor underactivity: 8 Years of experience from a single center

Underactive Bladder and Detrusor Underactivity: New Advances and Prospectives

Underactive bladder (UAB) is a prevalent but under-researched lower urinary tract symptom that typically occurs alongside detrusor underactivity (DU). Unlike UAB, DU is a urodynamic diagnosis which the International Continence Society (ICS) defines as "a contraction of reduced strength and/or duration, resulting in prolonged bladder emptying and/or a failure to achieve complete bladder emptying within a normal time span". Despite the widespread prevalence of UAB/DU, there are significant gaps in our understanding of its pathophysiological mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment compared with overactive bladder (OAB) and detrusor overactivity (DO). These gaps are such that clinicians regard UAB/DU as an incurable condition. In recent years, the understanding of UAB has increased. The definition of UAB has been clarified, and the diagnostic criteria for DU have been considered more comprehensively. Meanwhile, a number of non-invasive diagnostic methods have also been reported. Clinical trials involving novel drugs, electrical stimulation, and stem cell therapy have shown promising results. Therefore, this review summarizes recent reports on UAB and DU and highlights the latest advances in their diagnosis and treatment.

Randomized controlled trial of intravesical electrical stimulation for underactive bladder

AIM

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravesical electrical stimulation (IVES) performed with a novel device in patients with underactive bladder (UAB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a multicentre, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial of patients with UAB in China. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive conventional IVES (n = 38) or IVES with an open circuit (n = 38). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline in post-void residual urine volume (PVR) after 4 weeks of treatment. Secondary efficacy measures included changes in maximum urinary flow rate (Q_max ), bladder voiding efficiency (BVE), number of 24-h clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) procedures, and Patient Perception of Bladder Condition-Scale (PPBC-S) and American Urological Association Symptom Index Quality of Life (AUA-SI-QoL) scores from baseline after 4 weeks of treatment. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored throughout the trial.

RESULTS

In the full analysis set (FAS), the mean (sd) PVR changes in the trial and control groups at 4 weeks were -97.1 (107.5) mL and -10.5 (86.7) mL, respectively (P < 0.01). Similar results were obtained in the per-protocol set (PPS): -102.9 (100.0) mL vs 0.7 (82.5) mL (P < 0.01). In the FAS and PPS, Q_max improved significantly at 4 weeks (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03). In the FAS and PPS, BVE was significantly improved at 4 weeks in the two groups (P < 0.01 and P < 0.01), whereas no significant differences in the number of 24-h CIC procedures, PPBC-S score or AUA-SI-QoL score were observed between the groups. Six possible therapy-related AEs occurred in six patients (four in the trial group and two in the control group; P = 0.67), all of which were urinary tract infections. No severe AEs were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this clinical study strongly demonstrate that UAB patients benefit from this novel IVES device. More research is needed to validate the clinical utility of this device.

Urinary dysfunction in acute brain injury: A narrative review

The frontal lobe urinary control center is an important regulator of urinary function. Neurologic injury often causes damage or temporary dysfunction of this center and other related urinary control pathways. Little has been reported about this topic in the literature although a majority of neurologic injury patients suffer from some type of urinary dysfunction. In this review, we highlight what is known about urinary dysfunction based on injury type (traumatic brain injury, hemorrhagic stroke, ischemic stroke, subarachnoid hemorrhage, subdural hematoma, and epilepsy). We discuss both clinical and pre-clinical data and pinpoint areas warranting further investigation. In the final section, we provide proposed practice suggestions for managing these patients clinically with the intended goal for refinement in these approaches following further clinical trials.

Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells for treating osteoarthritis of the knee: a single-arm, open-label study

BACKGROUND

Despite being a common cause of quality-of-life impairment, there are no efficacious therapies that could prevent the progression of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). We conducted an open-label trial of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUC-MSCs) and hyaluronic acid (HA) for treating KOA.

METHODS

This open-label study was conducted from July 2015 to December 2018 at Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia. Patients diagnosed with KOA were injected three times, comprising of 10 × 106 units of hUC-MSCs in 2-ml secretome implantation and 2-ml hyaluronic acid (HA) injection in the first week, followed with 2-ml HA injection twice in the second and third week.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects (57 knees) were recruited. Seventeen (58.6%) subjects were male, and the mean age was 58.3 ± 9.6 years. Thirty-three (57.9%) knees were classified into Kellgren-Lawrence grade I-II KOA (mild OA). hUC-MSCs significantly decreased pain measured by visual analogue scale in severe KOA from initial to 6th month follow-up [5 ± 2.97 to 3.38 ± 2.44 (p = 0.035)]. The International Knee Documentation Committee score significantly increased at 6th month follow-up (53.26 ± 16.66 to 65.49 ± 13.01, p < 0.001, in subjects with grade I-II and 48.84 ± 18.41 to 61.83 ± 18.83, p = 0.008, in subjects with severe KOA). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis decreased significantly in both groups from initial to 6th month follow-up (from 22.55 ± 15.94 to 13.23 ± 10.29, p = 0.003, and from 27.57 ± 15.99 to 17.92 ± 19.1, p = 0.003, in those with mild and severe KOA, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

hUC-MSCs could be a potentially new regenerative treatment for KOA. The maximum effect of hUC-MSCs was achieved after 6 months of injection.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level II.

Electrical stimulation in the treatment of bladder dysfunction: technology update

The urinary bladder has two functions: urine storage and voiding. Clinically, two major categories of lower urinary tract symptoms can be defined: storage symptoms such as incontinence and urgency, and voiding symptoms such as feeling of incomplete bladder emptying and slow urinary stream. Urgency to void with or without incontinence is called overactive bladder (OAB). Slow urinary stream, hesitancy, and straining to void with the feeling of incomplete bladder emptying are often called underactive bladder (UAB). The underlying causes of OAB or UAB can be either non-neurogenic (also referred to as idiopathic) and neurogenic, for example due to spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. OAB and UAB can be treated conservatively by lifestyle intervention or medication. In the case that conservative treatment does not provide sufficient benefit, electrical stimulation can be used. Sacral neurostimulation or neuromodulation (SNM) is offered as a third-line therapy to patients with non-neurogenic OAB or UAB. In SNM, the third or fourth sacral nerve root is stimulated and after a test period, a neuromodulator is implanted in the buttock. Until recently only a non-rechargeable neuromodulator was approved for clinical use. However, nowadays, a rechargeable sacral neuromodulator is also on the market, with similar safety and effectiveness to the non-rechargeable SNM system. The rechargeable device was approved for full body 1.5T and 3T MRI in Europe in February 2019. Regarding neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, electrical stimulation only seems to benefit a selected group of patients.

Detrusor Underactivity and the Underactive Bladder: A Systematic Review of Preclinical and Clinical Studies

CONTEXT

Detrusor underactivity (DUA) is a common but relatively under-researched bladder dysfunction. Underactive bladder (UAB) is the symptom-based correlate of DUA. Recently, there has been renewed interest in this topic.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review and summarise the most recent literature and discuss this in the context of what is already known.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A systematic review of the literature was performed in December 2017 using Medline and Scopus databases. Separate searches of each database used a complex search strategy including "free text" protocols. Search terms included "underactive bladder", "detrusor underactivity", "acontractile bladder", "detrusor failure", "detrusor areflexia", "atonic bladder", "chronic retention", and "impaired bladder contractility".

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The initial search retrieved a total of 1690 studies; of these 44 were included in the final analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there has been an expansion in the literature concerning all aspects of DUA and UAB, knowledge on its epidemiology and aetiopathogenesis is still lacking; there remains a need to develop accurate reproducible diagnostic criteria and effective treatments, in particular drug therapies.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Recently, there has been renewed interest in underactive bladder with expanding research in this area. The lack of simple, reproducible, noninvasive diagnostic criteria has precluded an accurate estimation of the magnitude of the problem. Recent studies have highlighted the potential role of impaired bladder blood supply in causing bladder underactivity.