Out with the old, in with the new: immunosuppression minimization in children

Steroids in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a complex entity with high potential for harm and healthcare resource utilization. Despite multiple clinical advances in its ventilatory management, ARDS continues to be one of the most challenging disease processes for intensivists. It continues to lack a direct, proven and desperately needed effective therapeutic intervention. Given their biologic rationale, corticosteroids have been widely used by clinicians and considered useful by many in the management of ARDS since its first description. Adult data is abundant, yet contradictory. Controversy remains regarding the routine use of corticosteroids in ARDS. Therefore, widespread evidence-based recommendations for this heterogeneous disease process have not been made. In this article, our aim was to provide a summary of available evidence for the role of steroids in the treatment of ARDS, while giving special focus on pediatric ARDS (PARDS).

Rationale for Prolonged Glucocorticoid Use in Pediatric ARDS: What the Adults Can Teach Us

Based on molecular mechanisms and physiologic data, a strong association has been established between dysregulated systemic inflammation and progression of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). In ARDS patients, glucocorticoid receptor-mediated downregulation of systemic inflammation is essential to restore homeostasis, decrease morbidity and improve survival and can be significantly enhanced with prolonged low-to-moderate dose glucocorticoid treatment. A large body of evidence supports a strong association between prolonged glucocorticoid treatment-induced downregulation of the inflammatory response and improvement in pulmonary and extrapulmonary physiology. The balance of the available data from eight controlled trials (n = 622) provides consistent strong level of evidence for improving patient-centered outcomes and hospital survival. The sizable increase in mechanical ventilation-free days (weighted mean difference, 6.48 days; CI 95% 2.57-10.38, p < 0.0001) and intensive care unit-free days (weighted mean difference, 7.7 days; 95% CI, 3.13-12.20, p < 0.0001) by day 28 is superior to any investigated intervention in ARDS. For treatment initiated before day 14 of ARDS, the increased in hospital survival (70 vs. 52%, OR 2.41, CI 95% 1.50-3.87, p = 0.0003) translates into a number needed to treat to save one life of 5.5. Importantly, prolonged glucocorticoid treatment is not associated with increased risk for nosocomial infections (22 vs. 27%, OR 0.61, CI 95% 0.35-1.04, p = 0.07). Treatment decisions involve a tradeoff between benefits and risks, as well as costs. This low-cost, highly effective therapy is familiar to every physician and has a low risk profile when secondary prevention measures are implemented.

Everolimus in heart transplantation: an update

The evidence base relating to the use of everolimus in heart transplantation has expanded considerably in recent years, providing clinically relevant information regarding its use in clinical practice. Unless there are special considerations to take into account, all de novo heart transplant patients can be regarded as potential candidates for immunosuppression with everolimus and reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor therapy. Caution about the use of everolimus immediately after transplantation should be exercised in certain patients with the risk of severe proteinuria, with poor wound healing, or with uncontrolled severe hyperlipidemia. Initiation of everolimus in the early phase aftertransplant is not advisable in patients with severe pretransplant end-organ dysfunction or in patients on a left ventricular assist device beforetransplant who are at high risk of infection or of wound healing complications. The most frequent reason for introducing everolimus in maintenance heart transplant patients is to support minimization or withdrawal of calcineurin inhibitor therapy, for example, due to impaired renal function or malignancy. Due to its potential to inhibit the progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy and to reduce cytomegalovirus infection, everolimus should be initiated as soon as possible after heart transplantation. Immediate and adequate reduction of CNI exposure is mandatory from the start of everolimus therapy.

Medical adherence in pediatric organ transplantation: what are the next steps?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Adherence within pediatric transplantation has gained importance as the complexities of long-term medical management of these patients are identified and knowledge regarding the negative consequences of nonadherence accumulates. We review recent findings to highlight gaps in the literature and make suggestions for future directions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most research has focused on medication nonadherence, and a recent meta-analysis indicates that nonadherence is more prevalent in adolescent transplant recipients than in younger children. Nonadherence to other areas of the regimen (e.g. clinic attendance) may be even more common than medication nonadherence. However, work to date is based primarily on kidney and liver pediatric transplant patients, with a paucity of research on heart, lung and intestinal recipients. Risk factors for nonadherence after pediatric transplantation include poor family and child functioning. Intervention research remains rare. Challenges include the need for clearer definitions of what constitutes clinically significant nonadherence, longitudinal and prospective assessment of a wider range of potential risk factors, and the development and evaluation of interventions to treat or prevent nonadherence.

SUMMARY

Adherence research in pediatric transplantation is in its infancy. Significant opportunities exist to advance the field and create standards for effective identification, measurement, and treatment of nonadherence.

Psychiatric issues in pediatric organ transplantation

Solid organ transplantation has become the first line of treatment for a growing number of life-threatening pediatric illnesses. With improved survival, research into the long-term outcome of transplant recipients has become important to clinicians. Adherence to medical instructions remains a challenge, particularly in the adolescent population. New immunosuppressant approaches promise to expand organ transplantation in additional directions. Extension of transplantation into replacement of organs such as faces and hands raises complex ethical issues.

Immunosuppression therapy for pediatric heart transplantation

OPINION STATEMENT

Outcomes following cardiac transplantation in childhood continue to improve. Advances in immunosuppressive therapy over the past two decades likely have contributed to this trend. The evolution in the management of immunosuppression in children has been based on clinical experience rather than on evidence-based medicine; indeed, there have been no pivotal randomized controlled trials of any form of immunosuppression in pediatric thoracic transplantation. Important trends in immunosuppressive therapy and transplant outcomes have been obtained from large transplant registries. Several trends have been identified since the last review of this topic in this journal. First, there is increased knowledge of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of immunosuppressive drugs in children, with notable advances in the field of pharmacogenomics. These studies help explain individual variations in drug exposure, efficacy, and adverse events. They also help explain racial and ethnic variations in drug metabolism and efficacy. Second, there have been clear trends in the use of specific immunosuppressive medications. Use of induction therapy, especially polyclonal T cell-depleting antibody preparations, has increased significantly in recent years. The calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) tacrolimus is being used as the cornerstone of maintenance therapy in lieu of cyclosporine in more and more centers. Mounting evidence suggests that use of adjunctive agents (notably mycophenolate mofetil [MMF]) may improve outcomes, including survival, suggesting that monotherapy with CNIs is not the ideal maintenance therapy. Despite its increased cost, MMF has largely replaced azathioprine as the adjunctive agent of choice. Inhibitors of the mammalian target of rapamycin (i.e., sirolimus and everolimus) have not yet assumed a major place as adjunctive agents, as their safety and efficacy have not been well established in children. With the improvements in immunosuppressive therapy, the justification for routine corticosteroid use is far from clear, and many centers have shown excellent outcomes with complete steroid avoidance. Third, there is increasing interest in the importance of anti-HLA antibodies as important risk factors for adverse graft and patient outcomes. This is generating intense interest in treatments that target B cells and plasma cells. Finally, there is increasing realization that the "one size fits all" approach to immunosuppressive therapy is an obsolete concept and that the ultimate goal is to tailor immunosuppressive therapy to the needs of the individual patient. The development of reliable biomarkers of the patient's immune response to the allograft will be essential for optimal individualized immunosuppressive management.

Toxicity and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapy used in systemic autoimmune diseases

Systemic autoimmune diseases may be progressive and lead to organ system dysfunction and premature death. Current treatment paradigms are usually predominantly based on the administration of immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory drug therapy. Such therapy can stabilize systemic manifestations of connective tissue disease (CTD) and may put the disease into remission, and many of these agents are commonly used to treat CTD-associated interstitial lung disease (ILD). Although these agents have largely revolutionized the treatment of the systemic autoimmune diseases, adverse reactions, which can be serious and life threatening, to the various immunosuppressive agents used in the treatment of CTD can occur. Treating physicians must be aware of mechanisms of action of various immunosuppressive agents and be able to recognize the potential adverse reactions that may occur with therapy as well as potentially harmful effects on fetal development. Appropriate monitoring may prevent or limit toxicity from these agents, and knowledge of drug-drug interactions is essential when these agents are prescribed.

Psychiatric issues in pediatric organ transplantation

Solid organ transplantation has become the first line of treatment for a growing number of life-threatening pediatric illnesses. With improved survival, research into the long-term outcome of transplant recipients has become important to clinicians. Adherence to medical instructions remains a challenge, particularly in the adolescent population. New immunosuppressant approaches promise to expand organ transplantation in additional directions. Extension of transplantation into replacement of organs such as faces and hands raises complex ethical issues.

Tolerance induction by removal of alloreactive T cells: in-vivo and pruning strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Current depletion strategies used in clinical transplantation can prevent acute rejection of a transplanted organ; however, they are nonspecific and are limited by their efficacy or the side effects of wide ranging cellular depletion. This review will focus on strategies that prevent rejection of allografts using specific allodepletion of the T cells that mediate rejection.

RECENT FINDINGS

Strategies that use either in-vivo targeting of alloreactive T cells or ex-vivo manipulation to specifically reduce the alloreactive T-cell pool have been developed. The advantage of these approaches is that they are specific, by depleting cells that cause rejection while leaving the remaining immune system intact, thereby minimizing the detrimental complications associated with standard immunosuppression.

SUMMARY

Strategies to reduce the proportion of alloreactive T cells that initiate transplant rejection are emphasized. This factor has the specific advantage of leaving the remaining T-cell repertoire intact and may therefore be used in combination with other immunemodulating and tolerance strategies.

Calcineurin inhibitor minimization in pediatric liver allograft recipients

The use of CNI in pediatric LTx has dramatically improved the outcome for children with end-stage liver disease by significantly reducing the rate of acute and chronic rejection. Long-term concerns about CNI-induced nephrotoxicity and other adverse effects remain an issue, particularly as the emphasis moves from short-term survival to long-term quality of life. This review summarizes lessons learnt from pediatric and adult solid organ transplantation in minimizing CNI use in immunosuppression protocols in children following LTx. There are three models for CNI minimization: dose reduction, withdrawal or avoidance, supplemented by the use of IL-2 receptor blocking antibodies in the peri-transplant period, and early transition to alternate drugs such as MMF or SRL. Prospective studies evaluating reduction or withdrawal protocols in adult and pediatric LTx indicate that rejection rates are comparable with traditional CNI-based immunosuppression and that two and five yr patient and graft survival are similar, with recovery in renal function. There are few studies evaluating complete avoidance of CNI, apart from that in renal transplantation, although the benefits of long-term reduction in cardiovascular, metabolic, and possibly neoplastic side effects may justify this approach. It is not clear yet how CNI minimization will affect the development of tolerance but experimental and preliminary clinical studies indicate that CNI and steroid avoidance or minimization in the peri-operative period may favor the development of long-term graft tolerance. In summary, CNI minimization may be safe and effective in the short term but large-scale pediatric randomized studies are required to evaluate the long-term efficacy of these regimes in the development of chronic rejection, PTLD, and graft tolerance.