Clinical Characteristics and Short-Term Outcomes of Children With Asparaginase-Associated Pancreatitis

Anticancer therapy-induced adverse drug reactions in children and preventive and control measures

In recent years, considerable achievements have been made in pediatric oncology with the innovation and development of antitumor drugs. However, compared to adults, children as a special group have not yet matured fully in terms of liver and kidney function. Moreover, pediatric patients are prone to more adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from the accumulation of antineoplastic drugs due to their smaller body size and larger body surface area. Chemotherapy-related ADRs have become a non-negligible factor that affects cancer remission. To date, studies on ADRs in pediatric cancer patients have emerged internationally, but few systematic summaries are available. Here, we reviewed the various systemic ADRs associated with antitumor drugs in children and adolescent patients, as well as the advances in strategies to cope with ADRs, which consisted of neurotoxicity, hematological toxicity, cardiotoxicity, ADRs of the respiratory system and gastrointestinal system and urinary system, ADRs of the skin and its adnexa, allergic reactions, and other ADRs. For clinicians and researchers, understanding the causes, symptoms, and coping strategies for ADRs caused by anticancer treatments will undoubtedly benefit more children.

Pancreatitis-Associated Medication Use in Hospitalized Pediatric and Young Adult Patients With Acute Pancreatitis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is (1) to describe the prevalence of pancreatitis-associated medication (PAM) use at admission and discharge in pediatric and young adult patients hospitalized with acute pancreatitis (AP) and (2) to describe the prevalence of PAM use at admission in patients classified as having idiopathic AP.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-center retrospective study of patients <21 years who were hospitalized with AP or acute recurrent pancreatitis from March 2015 to July 2017 was performed. Charts were reviewed for demographic data, etiology of pancreatitis, comorbidities, and use of PAMs at admission and discharge. PAMs were defined and scored based on an evidence-based classification system, with class I PAMs having strongest evidence for causation. Standard descriptive statistics were used to report prevalence data.

RESULTS

Our cohort was comprised of 119 patients; 50% of patients were using a PAM at admission and 67% were taking a PAM at discharge, reflecting a significant change (P = 0.0009); 44% of patients classified as having idiopathic pancreatitis were taking a PAM on admission, reflecting a possibly missed role of medication in their presentation. Comorbidities significantly associated with PAM use included seizure disorder (P = 0.005) and oncologic disease (P = 0.005). The most commonly used class I PAMs were omeprazole, trimethoprim-sulfamethazole, valproic acid, and 6-mercaptopurine. The increase in prevalence of PAM use at discharge compared to admission was partially driven by addition of omeprazole to the outpatient medication regimen during the hospital stay (P = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Medications likely play an under-recognized role in pediatric AP. The practice of using proton pump inhibitors in management of AP warrants further study.

Macrophage Subsets and Death Are Responsible for Atherosclerotic Plaque Formation

Cardiovascular diseases, the notorious killer, are mainly caused by atherosclerosis (AS) characterized by lipids, cholesterol, and iron overload in plaques. Macrophages are effector cells and accumulate to the damaged and inflamed sites of arteries to internalize native and chemically modified lipoproteins to transform them into cholesterol-loaded foam cells. Foam cell formation is determined by the capacity of phagocytosis, migration, scavenging, and the features of phenotypes. Macrophages are diverse, and the subsets and functions are controlled by their surrounding microenvironment. Generally, macrophages are divided into classically activated (M1) and alternatively activated (M2). Recently, intraplaque macrophage phenotypes are recognized by the stimulation of CXCL4 (M4), oxidized phospholipids (Mox), hemoglobin/haptoglobin complexes [HA-mac/M(Hb)], and heme (Mhem). The pro-atherogenic or anti-atherosclerotic phenotypes of macrophages decide the progression of AS. Besides, apoptosis, necrosis, ferroptosis, autophagy and pyrotopsis determine plaque formation and cardiovascular vulnerability, which may be associated with macrophage polarization phenotypes. In this review, we first summarize the three most popular hypotheses for AS and find the common key factors for further discussion. Secondly, we discuss the factors affecting macrophage polarization and five types of macrophage death in AS progression, especially ferroptosis. A comprehensive understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of plaque formation is conducive to disentangling the candidate targets of macrophage-targeting therapies for clinical intervention at various stages of AS.