1
|
Dray J, Soubieux A, Chenailler C, Varin R, Dujardin F, Curado J, Barat E. Economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector: a review of the literature. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2024:ejhpharm-2023-003727. [PMID: 38503475 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2023-003727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review of the literature aimed to evaluate the economic impact of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector. METHODS The review followed the PRISMA recommendations. A bibliographic search was conducted on 23 June 2023 using PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science. All articles in French or English with economic data on clinical pharmacy activities in orthopaedics were included. Articles not mentioning the term 'orthopaedics' and those published prior to 1990 were excluded. Data from the studies were compiled in an Excel table. A bias analysis using the ROBINS-I Cochrane tool was performed. The methodology of the studies was compared and weighted using the CHEERS and STROBE checklists. RESULTS Among 529 articles initially identified, 10 were included in the review. The cost-benefit ratio of a clinical pharmacist in orthopaedics ranged from 0.47:1 to 28:1. The maximum savings reached US$73 410 /year in the American study and €1 42 356 /year in the French study. For three studies, the cost of a clinical pharmacist was not evaluated. Eight studies showed a positive economic impact. The Dutch study showed a balance and the Danish study showed a negative economic impact of €3442/month. CONCLUSIONS This literature review has shown an economic benefit of a clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector despite several biases and methodological limitations. The two studies that did not confirm this benefit only evaluated a limited number of expected benefits. Nevertheless, the economic impact of the clinical pharmacist in the orthopaedic sector seems positive and undervalued.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua Dray
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | | | - Remi Varin
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Franck Dujardin
- Department of Orthopedics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Jonathan Curado
- Department of Orthopedics, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Eric Barat
- Department of Pharmacy, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bailly R, Wuyts S, Toelen L, Mets T, Van Hauwermeiren C, Scheerlinck T, Cortoos PJ, Lieten S. Introducing a pharmacist-led transmural care program to reduce drug-related problems in orthogeriatric patients: a prospective interventional study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:47. [PMID: 38212699 PMCID: PMC10782737 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-023-04591-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthogeriatric patients have an increased risk for complications due to underlying comorbidities, chronic drug therapy and frequent treatment changes during hospitalization. The clinical pharmacist (CP) plays a key role in transmural communication concerning polypharmacy to improve continuity of care by the general practitioner (GP) after discharge. In this study, a pharmacist-led transmural care program, tailored to orthogeriatric patients, was evaluated to reduce drug related problems (DRPs) after discharge. METHODS An interventional study was performed (pre-period: 1/10/2021-31/12/2021; post-period: 1/01/2022-31/03/2022). Patients (≥ 65 years) from the orthopedic department were included. The pre-group received usual care, the post-group received the pharmacist-led transmural care program. The DRP reduction rate one month after discharge was calculated. Associated factors for the DRP reduction rate were determined in a multiple linear regression analysis. The GP acceptance rate was determined for the proposed interventions, as well as their clinical impact using the Clinical, Economic and Organizational (CLEO) tool. Readmissions one month after discharge were evaluated. RESULTS Overall, 127 patients were included (control n = 61, intervention n = 66). The DRP reduction rate was statistically significantly higher in the intervention group compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The pharmacist's intervention was associated with an increased DRP reduction rate (+ 1.750, 95% confidence interval 1.222-2.278). In total, 141 interventions were suggested by the CP, of which 71% were accepted one month after discharge. In both periods, four patients were readmitted one month after discharge. 58% of the interventions had a clinical impact (≥ 2 C level using the CLEO-tool) according to the geriatrician and for the CP it was 45%, indicating that they had the potential to avoid patient harm. CONCLUSIONS The pharmacist-led transmural care program significantly reduced DRPs in geriatric patients from the orthopedic department one month after discharge. The transmural communication with GPs resulted in a high acceptance rate of the proposed interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Bailly
- Departement of Pharmacy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Stephanie Wuyts
- Departement of Pharmacy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Research Group Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Loic Toelen
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tony Mets
- Department of Geriatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Thierry Scheerlinck
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Pieter-Jan Cortoos
- Departement of Pharmacy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Siddhartha Lieten
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Geriatrics, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Van De Sijpe G, Hublou W, Declercq P, Metsemakers WJ, Sermon A, Casteels M, Foulon V, Quintens C, Spriet I. Bedside check of medication appropriateness (BED-CMA) as a risk-based tool for bedside clinical pharmacy services: A proof-of-concept study at the trauma surgery ward. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2023; 22:58-65. [PMID: 38022766 PMCID: PMC10656193 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Bedside clinical pharmacy prevents drug-related problems, but is not feasible in many countries due to limited resources. Hence, clinical rules using structural information in the electronic health record can help identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs). We aimed to develop and implement a risk-based clinical pharmacy service and evaluate its impact on prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Methods The proportion of residual PIPs per day, i.e. the number of PIPs that persisted up to 24 h after pharmacist intervention divided by the number of PIPs at T0, was evaluated before and after implementation of the intervention in an interrupted time series analysis. The pre-intervention cohort received usual pharmacy services, i.e. a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee. Fifteen clinical rules, targeting antimicrobial, anticoagulant and analgesic therapy were implemented in the post-intervention period. The pre-intervention period was compared to two post-intervention scenarios: A) clinical rule alerts reviewed by a 0.3 FTE clinical pharmacist trainee; and B) clinical rule alerts reviewed daily for approximately 1 h by a clinical pharmacist trainee. Results Pre-intervention, a median proportion of 67% (range 0%-100%) residual PIPs per day was observed. Scenario A showed an immediate relative reduction of 14% (p = 0.72) and scenario B a significant immediate relative reduction of 85% (p = 0.0015) in residual PIPs per day. In scenario A, recommendations were provided for 19% of clinical rule alerts, of which 67% was accepted by the surgeon within 24 h. In scenario B, recommendations were given for 56% of alerts, of which 84% was accepted. Conclusions Using clinical rules is an effective approach to organize bedside clinical pharmacy services and improves prescribing at the trauma surgery ward. Advanced training and daily follow-up of the clinical rules are two requirements to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greet Van De Sijpe
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Wencke Hublou
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Declercq
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - An Sermon
- Department of Trauma Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Minne Casteels
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Charlotte Quintens
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabel Spriet
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mahomedradja RF, Schinkel M, Sigaloff KCE, Reumerman MO, Otten RHJ, Tichelaar J, van Agtmael MA. Factors influencing in-hospital prescribing errors: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2023; 89:1724-1735. [PMID: 36805648 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM In-hospital prescribing errors (PEs) may result in patient harm, prolonged hospitalization and hospital (re)admission. These events are associated with pressure on healthcare services and significant healthcare costs. To develop targeted interventions to prevent or reduce in-hospital PEs, identification and understanding of facilitating and protective factors influencing in-hospital PEs in current daily practice is necessary, adopting a Safety-II perspective. The aim of this systematic review was to create an overview of all factors reported in the literature, both protective and facilitating, as influencing in-hospital PEs. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE.com and the Cochrane Library (via Wiley) were searched, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement, for studies that identified factors influencing in-hospital PEs. Both qualitative and quantitative study designs were included. RESULTS Overall, 19 articles (6 qualitative and 13 quantitative studies) were included and 40 unique factors influencing in-hospital PEs were identified. These factors were categorized into five domains according to the Eindhoven classification ('organization-related', 'prescriber-related', 'prescription-related', 'technology-related' and 'unclassified') and visualized in an Ishikawa (Fishbone) diagram. Most of the identified factors (87.5%; n = 40) facilitated in-hospital PEs. The most frequently identified facilitating factor (39.6%; n = 19) was 'insufficient (drug) knowledge, prescribing skills and/or experience of prescribers'. CONCLUSION The findings of this review could be used to identify points of engagement for future intervention studies and help hospitals determine how to optimize prescribing. A multifaceted intervention, targeting multiple factors might help to circumvent the complex challenge of in-hospital PEs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashudy F Mahomedradja
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Schinkel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (CEMM), Amsterdam UMC location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim C E Sigaloff
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michael O Reumerman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - René H J Otten
- University Library, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Tichelaar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel A van Agtmael
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Xie J, Huang X, Gao M, Wei L, Wang R, Chen J, Zeng Y, Ji B, Liu T, Wang J, Wu H, Wang Y, Qin L, Wang Y, Zheng Z, Xue J, Wu J, Chen X, Zheng Z, Li X. Surgical Pharmacy for Optimizing Medication Therapy Management Services within Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS(®)) Programs. J Clin Med 2023; 12. [PMID: 36675560 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Drug-related problems (DRPs) are common among surgical patients, especially older patients with polypharmacy and underlying diseases. DRPs can potentially lead to morbidity, mortality, and increased treatment costs. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) system has shown great advantages in managing surgical patients. Medication therapy management for surgical patients (established as "surgical pharmacy" by Guangdong Province Pharmaceutical Association (GDPA)) is an important part of the ERAS system. Improper medication therapy management can lead to serious consequences and even death. In order to reduce DRPs further, and promote the rapid recovery of surgical patients, the need for pharmacists in the ERAS program is even more pressing. However, the medication therapy management services of surgical pharmacy and how surgical pharmacists should participate in ERAS programs are still unclear worldwide. Therefore, this article reviews the main perioperative medical management strategies and precautions from several aspects, including antimicrobial agents, antithrombotic agents, pain medication, nutritional therapy, blood glucose monitoring, blood pressure treatment, fluid management, treatment of nausea and vomiting, and management of postoperative delirium. Additionally, the way surgical pharmacists participate in perioperative medication management, and the relevant medication pathways are explored for optimizing medication therapy management services within the ERAS programs. This study will greatly assist surgical pharmacists' work, contributing to surgeons accepting that pharmacists have an important role in the multidisciplinary team, benefitting medical workers in treating, counseling, and advocating for their patients, and further improving the effectiveness, safety and economy of medication therapy for patients and promoting patient recovery.
Collapse
|
6
|
Parrish RH, Bodenstab HM, Carneal D, Cassity RM, Dager WE, Hyland SJ, Lovely JK, Pollock A, Sparkes TM, Wong S. Positive Patient Postoperative Outcomes with Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review including Perioperative-Specialty Pharmacist Interviews. J Clin Med 2022; 11:5628. [PMID: 36233497 PMCID: PMC9572852 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The influence of pharmacotherapy regimens on surgical patient outcomes is increasingly appreciated in the era of enhanced recovery protocols and institutional focus on reducing postoperative complications. Specifics related to medication selection, dosing, frequency of administration, and duration of therapy are evolving to optimize pharmacotherapeutic regimens for many enhanced recovery protocolized elements. This review provides a summary of recent pharmacotherapeutic strategies, including those configured within electronic health record (EHR) applications and functionalities, that are associated with the minimization of the frequency and severity of postoperative complications (POCs), shortened hospital length of stay (LOS), reduced readmission rates, and cost or revenue impacts. Further, it will highlight preventive pharmacotherapy regimens that are correlated with improved patient preparation, especially those related to surgical site infection (SSI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative ileus (POI), and emergence delirium (PoD) as well as less commonly encountered POCs such as acute kidney injury (AKI) and atrial fibrillation (AF). The importance of interprofessional collaboration in all periprocedural phases, focusing on medication management through shared responsibilities for drug therapy outcomes, will be emphasized. Finally, examples of collaborative care through shared mental models of drug stewardship and non-medical practice agreements to improve operative throughput, reduce operative stress, and increase patient satisfaction are illustrated.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mohammed M, Bayissa B, Getachew M, Adem F. Drug-related problems and determinants among elective surgical patients: A prospective observational study. SAGE Open Med 2022; 10:20503121221122438. [PMID: 36093421 PMCID: PMC9459467 DOI: 10.1177/20503121221122438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to assess drug-related problems and determinants among elective surgical patients admitted to Jimma University Medical Center. Methods A hospital-based prospective observational study was conducted at Jimma University Medical Center, from April 10 to July 10, 2018. Data were collected through patients' interview and physicians' medication orders and charts review using pre-tested questionnaire and data abstraction formats. Drug-related problems were assessed for each patient using drug-related problem classification tool. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for Social Science for windows; version 21.0. The predictors of drug-related problems were determined by multivariable logistic regression analysis. A p-value of less than or equal to 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Results Of the total 141 participants, 98 (69.5%) of them had at least one drug-related problem during their hospital stay. A total of 152 drug-related problems were identified among 141 elective surgical patients. The most common identified drug-related problems were indication-related problems (39%) followed by effectiveness-related problems (21%) and safety-related problems (21%). The presence of complication (adjusted odds ratio = 2.90, 95% confidence interval (1.302, 3.460)), American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status ⩾ 2 (adjusted odds ratio = 6.01, 95% confidence interval (1.0011, 9.500)), and postoperative antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio = 6.027, 95% confidence interval (1.594, 22.792)) were independent predictors of drug-related problems. Conclusion The prevalence of drug-related problems is high among elective surgical patients. The indication-related problems were the most common category of drug-related problem identified among elective surgical patients. The presence of complication, American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status ⩾ 2, and postoperative antibiotics were the independent predictors of drug-related problems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesud Mohammed
- Department of Pharmacy, School of Medicine, Madda Walabu University, Goba, Ethiopia
| | - Bodena Bayissa
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Mestawet Getachew
- School of Pharmacy, Institute of Health Sciences, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia
| | - Fuad Adem
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Dire Dawa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jung-Poppe L, Nicolaus HF, Roggenhofer A, Altenbuchner A, Dormann H, Pfistermeister B, Maas R. Systematic Review of Risk Factors Assessed in Predictive Scoring Tools for Drug-Related Problems in Inpatients. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11175185. [PMID: 36079114 PMCID: PMC9457151 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Drug-related problems (DRP, defined as adverse drug events/reactions and medication errors) are a common threat for patient safety. With the aim to aid improved allocation of specialist resources and to improve detection and prevention of DRP, numerous predictive scoring tools have been proposed. The external validation and evidence for the transferability of these tools still faces limitations. However, the proposed scoring tools include partly overlapping sets of similar factors, which may allow a new approach to estimate the external usability and validity of individual risk factors. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and analysis. We identified 14 key studies that assessed 844 candidate risk factors for inclusion into predictive scoring tools. After consolidation to account for overlapping terminology and variable definitions, we assessed each risk factor in the number of studies it was assessed, and, if it was found to be a significant predictor of DRP, whether it was included in a final scoring tool. The latter included intake of ≥ 8 drugs, drugs of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) class N, ≥1 comorbidity, an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min and age ≥60 years. The methodological approach and the individual risk factors presented in this review may provide a new starting point for improved risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lea Jung-Poppe
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: (L.J.-P.); (R.M.)
| | - Hagen Fabian Nicolaus
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Roggenhofer
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Anna Altenbuchner
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Harald Dormann
- Central Emergency Department, Fürth Hospital, 90766 Fürth, Germany
| | | | - Renke Maas
- Institute of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
- Correspondence: (L.J.-P.); (R.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abu Hammour K, Abu Farha R, Ya’acoub R, Salman Z, Basheti I. Impact of Pharmacist-Directed Medication Reconciliation in Reducing Medication Discrepancies: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Hosp Pharm 2022; 75:169-177. [PMID: 35847464 PMCID: PMC9245405 DOI: 10.4212/cjhp.3143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Background In hospital surgical wards, patients are at higher risk for medication errors, in part because physicians may not consider themselves sufficiently trained to prescribe medications. Hence, collaborative teamwork involving the pharmacist is needed. Objectives To assess the impact of medication reconciliation directed by pharmacists on decreasing medication discrepancies after discharge from the surgical ward. Methods Patients admitted to the surgical unit at a tertiary teaching hospital in Amman, Jordan, between July 2017 and July 2018 were selected and randomly assigned to either the control or the intervention group. Upon admission, the number and kinds of unintentional medication discrepancies were determined for both groups. Medication reconciliation was then provided to patients in the intervention group. The number of unintentional discrepancies was re-evaluated upon discharge for both groups. To assess differences between the control and intervention groups, the χ2 or Fisher exact test was used for categorical variables and an independent-sample t test for continuous data. A paired t test was conducted to determine whether the number of medication discrepancies was reduced as a result of pharmacists' recommendations. Results A total of 123 patients met the inclusion criteria, 61 in the intervention group and 62 in the control group. Discrepancies of omission and wrong dose constituted 41 (77%) of the 53 discrepancies in the intervention group and 25 (76%) of the 33 discrepancies in the control group. The number of unintentional discrepancies was significantly reduced from admission to discharge in both the intervention group (p = 0.002) and the control group (p = 0.007). Of 53 recommendations made by pharmacists, 20 (38%) were accepted by the treating physician, and all of these discrepancies were resolved. Conclusions This study sheds light on the existence of unintentional medication discrepancies upon admission for surgical patients, which may expose the patients to potential harm upon discharge from hospital. Additional studies with a larger sample size are needed to gain further insights on pharmacists' role in implementing medication reconciliation for surgical patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Marsh KM, Turrentine FE, Knight K, Attridge E, Chen X, Vittitow S, Jones RS. Defining and Studying Errors in Surgical Care: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg 2021. [PMID: 34954760 DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to determine the extent surgical disciplines categorize, define, and study errors, then use this information to provide recommendations for both current practice and future study. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA The report "To Err is Human" brought the ubiquity of medical errors to public attention. Variability in subsequent literature suggests the true prevalence of error remains unknown. METHODS In January 2020, PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Only studies with Oxford Level of Evidence Level 3 or higher were included. RESULTS Of 3,064 studies, 92 met inclusion criteria: 6 randomized controlled trials, 4 systematic reviews, 24 cohort, 10 before-after, 35 outcome/audit, 5 cross sectional and 8 case-control studies. Over 15,933,430 patients and 162,113 errors were represented. There were 6 broad error categories, 13 different definitions of error, and 14 study methods. CONCLUSIONS Reported prevalence of error varied widely due to a lack of standardized categorization, definitions, and study methods. Future research should focus on immediately recognizing errors to minimize harm.
Collapse
|
11
|
Renaudin P, Coste A, Audurier Y, Berbis J, Canovas F, Jalabert A, Castet-Nicolas A, Mercier G, Villiet M, Dagneaux L, Breuker C. Clinical, Economic, and Organizational Impact of the Clinical Pharmacist in an Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery Department. J Patient Saf 2021; 17:e1507-e1513. [PMID: 30365407 DOI: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical, economic, and organizational impact of clinical pharmacist services added to an adult orthopedic and trauma surgery unit in a university hospital. METHODS This was a prospective, observational study performed from January to February 2017. All pharmacists' interventions were documented, and their clinical, economic, and organizational impact and the probability of adverse drug events (ADEs) were assessed using the clinical, economic and organizational scale three-dimensional scale. An expert panel composed of three clinical pharmacists, one surgeon and one anesthetist classified the pharmacist intervention. The potential clinical impact was determined through a consensus by the expert panel. Cost avoidance was calculated for serious ADEs with a major impact by avoiding an additional cost of €4912 per event and taking into account the probability of ADE occurrence. RESULTS The pharmacists performed 1014 interventions for 28 days with a 95.3% acceptance rate by prescribers. Thirty-nine interventions were rated to have a major clinical impact (3.8%). The organizational impact was estimated favorable for 856 (84.4%) pharmacist interventions. Cost avoidance was estimated at €24,364, and the indirect costs benefit was estimated at €11,864 during the study. The cost-benefit ratio of the clinical pharmacist intervention was €1.94 in savings for every €1 invested. CONCLUSIONS Clinical pharmacist services in an orthopedic and trauma surgery department have the potential to improve patient outcomes and avoid healthcare costs. Furthermore, the presence of a pharmacist in surgical units allows for communication between the unit and the pharmacy, which produces better fluidity and improves the quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Annabelle Coste
- From the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Pharmacie, Département de Pharmacie Clinique Dispensation et Economie de Santé
| | | | - Julie Berbis
- Aix-Marseille Université, EA 3279 - Centre d'Études et de Recherche sur les Services de Santé et la Qualité de Vie, Faculté de Médecine Timone, Marseille
| | - François Canovas
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique du Membre Inferieur et de Traumatologie
| | - Anne Jalabert
- From the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Pharmacie, Département de Pharmacie Clinique Dispensation et Economie de Santé
| | | | - Gregoire Mercier
- Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Medical Information, Montpellier University Hospital
| | - Maxime Villiet
- From the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Pharmacie, Département de Pharmacie Clinique Dispensation et Economie de Santé
| | - Louis Dagneaux
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Département de Chirurgie Orthopédique du Membre Inferieur et de Traumatologie
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shang J, Ning W, Gong J, Su D, Jia X, Wang Y. Impact of clinical pharmacist services on anticoagulation management of total joint arthroplasty: A retrospective observational study. J Clin Pharm Ther 2021; 46:1301-1307. [PMID: 33904165 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2021] [Revised: 03/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Even if total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients have received conventional antithrombotic therapy, the incidence of thrombosis remains high. Clinical pharmacists have been involved in the multidisciplinary team of orthopaedics, but their roles and functions are not yet defined. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of clinical pharmacist services on the use of anticoagulant drugs, the rationality of medication and the incidence of thrombosis in patients with TJA. METHODS This retrospective, observational cohort study was conducted for patients undergoing TJA procedures. Study variables were collected for a baseline period of 1 January 2016 to 30 June 2017 and an intervention period of 1 January 2018 to 30 June 2019, allowing for a 6-month run-in period. For demographic characteristics, the use of anticoagulant drugs and the incidence of thrombosis between the baseline and intervention periods, the data were statistically analysed. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION During the 36-month study timeframe, a total of 591 TJA procedures were performed. A total of 577 participants were included in the study (240 in the baseline group and 377 in the intervention group). After clinical pharmacist participation, the prevention rate of anticoagulant drugs (p < 0.05), the proportion of oral anticoagulants (p = 0.000) and the course of preventive treatment (p = 0.004) increased significantly. The time of administration was shortened from after 24 h to within 24 h post-surgery (p = 0.000). Although the incidence of symptomatic DVT reduced in the intervention period, there was no statistical difference in either the hospital, 1-month follow-up, or 3-month follow-up after surgery (all p > 0.05). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION Within the limitations of a retrospective study, clinical pharmacist intervention was associated with improvements in anticoagulation management of TJA procedures, likely conferring beneficial effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingjing Shang
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Wei Ning
- Department of Pharmacy, Hunan Provincial Peoples' Hospital, Changsha, China
| | - Jinhong Gong
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Dan Su
- Department of Pharmacy, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Xiaojun Jia
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| | - Yuji Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Quintens C, De Coster J, Van der Linden L, Morlion B, Nijns E, Van den Bosch B, Peetermans WE, Spriet I. Impact of Check of Medication Appropriateness (CMA) in optimizing analgesic prescribing: An interrupted time series analysis. Eur J Pain 2020; 25:704-713. [PMID: 33259703 DOI: 10.1002/ejp.1705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain therapy in inpatients is regularly suboptimal and might be improved by clinical pharmacy services. In our hospital, we have implemented a software-supported 'Check of Medication Appropriateness' (CMA), which is a centralized pharmacist-led service consisting of a clinical rule-based screening for potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs), and a subsequent medication review by pharmacists. We aimed to investigate the impact of the CMA on pain-related prescribing. METHODS A quasi-experimental study was performed in a large teaching hospital, using an interrupted time series design. Pre-implementation, patients were exposed to standard of care. Afterwards, a pain-focused CMA comprising 12 specific clinical rules pertaining to analgesic prescribing were implemented in the post-implementation period. A regression model was used to assess the impact of the intervention on the number of pain-related residual PIPs between both periods. The total number of recommendations and acceptance rate was recorded for the post-implementation period. RESULTS At baseline, a median number of 13.1 (range: 9.5-15.8) residual PIPs per day was observed. After the CMA intervention, the number was reduced to 2.2 (range: 0-9.5) per day. Clinical rules showed an immediate relative reduction of 66% (p < .0001) in pain-related residual PIPs. A significant decreasing time trend was observed during the post-implementation period. Post-implementation, 1683 recommendations were given over 1 year with an acceptance rate of 74.3%. CONCLUSIONS We proved that the CMA approach reduced the number of pain-related residual PIPs. More pharmacist involvement and the use of clinical rules during hospital stay should be further promoted to optimize appropriate prescribing of analgesics. SIGNIFICANCE Prescribing of analgesics should be improved in inpatients to optimize pain control and to reduce iatrogenic harm. The Check of Medication Appropriateness (CMA) approach, comprising a clinical rule-based screening for patients at risk and a targeted medication review by pharmacists, reduced the number of pain-related potentially inappropriate prescriptions in a highly significant and sustained manner. This study presents the opportunities of a centralized clinical pharmacy service to help clinicians to further improve analgesic prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Quintens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan De Coster
- Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lorenz Van der Linden
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Morlion
- Leuven Centre for Algology & Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Egon Nijns
- Department of Information Technology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Bart Van den Bosch
- Department of Information Technology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Willy E Peetermans
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabel Spriet
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mahomedradja RF, Sigaloff KCE, Bekema JK, Dekker MJHJ, Brinkman DJ, Kuijvenhoven MA, van Beneden MLH, Lissenberg-Witte BI, Tichelaar J, van Agtmael MA. The pharmacotherapy team: A novel strategy to improve appropriate in-hospital prescribing using a participatory intervention action method. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 87:565-576. [PMID: 32520431 PMCID: PMC9328271 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2019] [Revised: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Prescribing medication is a complex process that, when done inappropriately, can lead to adverse drug events, resulting in patient harm and hospital admissions. Worldwide cost is estimated at 42 billion USD each year. Despite several efforts in the past years, medication-related harm has not declined. The aim was to determine whether a prescriber-focussed participatory action intervention, initiated by a multidisciplinary pharmacotherapy team, is able to reduce the number of in-hospital prescriptions containing ≥1 prescribing error (PE), by identifying and reducing challenges in appropriate prescribing. METHODS A prospective single-centre before- and after study was conducted in an academic hospital in the Netherlands. Twelve clinical wards (medical, surgical, mixed and paediatric) were recruited. RESULTS Overall, 321 patients with a total of 2978 prescriptions at baseline were compared with 201 patients with 2438 prescriptions postintervention. Of these, m456 prescriptions contained ≥1 PE (15.3%) at baseline and 357 prescriptions contained ≥1 PEs (14.6%) postintervention. PEs were determined in multidisciplinary consensus. On some study wards, a trend toward a decreasing number of PEs was observed. The intervention was associated with a nonsignificant difference in PEs (incidence rate ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.83-1.10), which was unaltered after correction. The most important identified challenges were insufficient knowledge beyond own expertise, unawareness of guidelines and a heavy workload. CONCLUSION The tailored interventions developed with and implemented by stakeholders led to a statistically nonsignificant reduction in inappropriate in-hospital prescribing after a 6-month intervention period. Our prescriber-focussed participatory action intervention identified challenges in appropriate in-hospital prescribing on prescriber- and organizational level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashudy F Mahomedradja
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kim C E Sigaloff
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jessica K Bekema
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J H J Dekker
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - David J Brinkman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marianne A Kuijvenhoven
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marlou L H van Beneden
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit I Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jelle Tichelaar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel A van Agtmael
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section Pharmacotherapy, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Research and Expertise Center in Pharmacotherapy Education (RECIPE), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Baumgartner AD, Clark CM, LaValley SA, Monte SV, Wahler RG, Singh R. Interventions to deprescribe potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly: Lost in translation? J Clin Pharm Ther 2020; 45:453-461. [PMID: 31873955 PMCID: PMC7200270 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Revised: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 11/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE Use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) remains common in older adults, despite the easy availability of screening tools such as the Beers and Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria. Multiple published studies have implemented these screening tools to encourage deprescribing of PIMs, with mixed results. Little is known about the reasons behind the success or failure of these interventions, or what could be done to improve their impact. Implementation science (IS) provides a set of theories, models and frameworks to address these questions. The goal of this study was to conduct a focused narrative review of the deprescribing literature through an IS lens-to determine the extent to which implementation factors were identified and the intermediate steps in the intervention were measured. A better understanding of the existing literature, including its gaps, may provide a roadmap for future research. METHODS PubMed search from 2000-2019 using appropriate MeSH headings. INCLUSION CRITERIA controlled trials or prospective cohort studies intended to reduce PIMs in the elderly that used hospitalizations and/or emergency department visits as outcome measures. Studies were reviewed to identify potential implementation factors (known as determinants), using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guide. In addition, intermediate outcomes were extracted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Of the 548 reviewed abstracts, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and underwent detailed analysis. Of the 14 studies, 10 acknowledged potential implementation determinants that could be mapped onto CFIR. The most commonly identified determinant was the degree of pharmacist integration into the medical team (seven of 14 studies), which mapped onto the CFIR construct of 'networks and communication'. Several important CFIR constructs were absent in the reviewed literature. Intermediate measures were captured by 12 of the 14 reviewed papers, but the choice of measures was inconsistent across studies. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION In recent high-quality studies of deprescribing interventions, we found limited acknowledgement of factors known to be important to successful implementation and inconsistent reporting of intermediate outcomes. These findings indicate missed opportunities to understand the factors underlying study outcomes. As a result, we run the risk of rejecting worthwhile interventions due to negative results, when the correct interpretation might be that they failed in implementation. In other words, they were 'lost in translation'. Studies that rigorously examine and report on the implementation process are needed to tease apart this important distinction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew D Baumgartner
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Collin M Clark
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Susan A LaValley
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Scott V Monte
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Robert G Wahler
- School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Ranjit Singh
- Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Liu S, Gnjidic D, Nguyen J, Penm J. Effectiveness of interventions on the appropriate use of opioids for noncancer pain among hospital inpatients: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2020; 86:210-243. [PMID: 31863503 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS To summarise the effectiveness of interventions on appropriate opioid use for noncancer pain among hospital inpatients. METHODS Two reviewers independently searched 6 databases up to March 2018 original research articles reporting on quantitative outcomes of interventions on appropriate opioid use among hospital inpatients. Appropriate opioid use was measured by changes in prescribing, such as the lowest effective opioid dose and duration, or clinical outcomes such as adequate pain control. Quality and intervention complexity assessments were performed by 2 independent reviewers. The full methodological approach was published on PROSPERO (ID: CRD42019145947). RESULTS Of 398 full-text articles assessed for eligibility, 37 articles were included in the review. Most articles had a moderate or high risk of bias (27 of 37 studies). Thirty-one articles primarily addressed appropriate opioid use and 6 articles targeted opioid safety as a secondary outcome. A multifaceted approach was the most common primary intervention (16 studies) and adequate pain control was the main outcome measured (14 studies). Health provider education, reinforced by hard-copy material and feedback, was associated with a 13.0 to 29.5% increase in the proportion of opioid prescriptions written in concordance with local guidelines and reduced pain scores ranging from 7.0 to 34.5%. Interventions to improve opioid safety in patient-controlled analgesia reduced medication errors by up to 89.1%. CONCLUSION Interventions involving academic detailing and education, especially when reinforced by feedback, show positive effects on appropriate opioid use among hospital inpatients. Future studies investigating the impact of administrative interventions on opioid use and related outcomes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shania Liu
- Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.,Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jessica Nguyen
- Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jonathan Penm
- Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Xie C, Mu X, Hu Z, Wang W, Huang W, Huang G, Wang C, Yin D. Impact of pharmaceutical care in the orthopaedic department. J Clin Pharm Ther 2019; 45:401-407. [PMID: 31800132 DOI: 10.1111/jcpt.13091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 11/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE In the mid-1960s, clinical pharmacy developed in the USA, and as the demand for pharmaceutical services continued to grow, their impact began to be taken seriously. However, the participation of clinical pharmacists as members of the multidisciplinary team in the orthopaedic department is still in its infancy, although its role in orthopaedics has not been defined. The object of this study was to identify and discuss the impact of pharmaceutical care in the orthopaedic department. METHODS A literature search was conducted on MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) for papers published between 1998 and 2019, using the keywords pharmacy, pharmacist, and medication or drug combined with orthopaedic. Other available resources were also used to identify relevant articles. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Based on the available evidence in 74 articles, it was found that clinical pharmacists play an important role in all aspects of rational use of medications, medication review and reconciliation, monitoring adverse drug events, risk assessment, and medication education and counselling. In addition, clinical pharmacy services were developed to minimize medication errors, adverse drug events and medical costs, but clinical pharmacy is still in its early stages in orthopaedics. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION A multidisciplinary approach should be adopted in the orthopaedic department, as pharmacist interventions can be vital for promoting the safety, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of pharmacotherapy. Although pharmacists' contributions to orthopaedics are not yet fully recognized, pharmaceutical services can undoubtedly contribute to both clinical and societal outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengxin Xie
- Faculty of Graduate Studies, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
| | - Xiaoping Mu
- Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Zhuangming Hu
- Faculty of Nursing, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Faculty of Graduate Studies, Guangxi University of Chinese Medicine, Nanning, China
| | - Wenwen Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Ge Huang
- Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Chenglong Wang
- Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| | - Dong Yin
- Department of Orthopedics, The People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Van der Linden L, Decoutere L, Beerten L, Delva T, Spriet I, Flamaing J, Tournoy J. External validation of a clinical pharmacy intervention in geriatric inpatients: a controlled study. Int J Clin Pharm 2019; 41:853-858. [PMID: 31093941 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-019-00846-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 05/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Background Clinical pharmacist interventions have been shown to improve drug use in older adults. Study findings are seldom externally validated however. Objective First, to validate a minimized iteration of a previously tested intervention of clinical pharmacists in a non-academic setting with limited staffing resources. Second, to compare the potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) reduction to two previous controlled interventional studies. Methods A controlled study was performed at geriatric wards. The control group received usual care. The intervention group was exposed to a clinical pharmacist led medication review, based on the use of the RASP list, (the Rationalization of Home Medication by an Adjusted STOPP list in Older Patients). Drug use on admission and at discharge were evaluated, including the number of RASP-identified potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). The PIM reduction was compared to two previous controlled study findings using a linear mixed model. Results Drug use declined during hospital stay, without differences between control (n = 29) and intervention group (n = 32). Antidepressants and hypnotic drugs were discontinued more frequently in IG patients. More PIMs were reduced in the intervention patients (control vs. intervention: 1.0 vs. 3.0, p < 0.001). Across three controlled studies, a robust reduction of 1.56 PIMs (95% confidence interval 1.10-2.02, p < 0.001) was observed in favor of the CP interventions. Conclusion The minimal CP intervention resulted in fewer RASP PIMs. No net reduction of drug use was observed, yet fewer antidepressants and hypnotic drugs were used. The RASP PIM reduction was comparable to previous investigations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorenz Van der Linden
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. .,Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
| | | | - Leen Beerten
- Pharmacy Department, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Toon Delva
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Jessa Hospital, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Isabel Spriet
- Pharmacy Department, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium.,Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Johan Flamaing
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Jos Tournoy
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.,Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bos JM, Kalkman GA, Groenewoud H, van den Bemt PMLA, De Smet PAGM, Nagtegaal JE, Wieringa A, van der Wilt GJ, Kramers C. Prediction of clinically relevant adverse drug events in surgical patients. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0201645. [PMID: 30138343 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification of hospital patients for adverse drug events would enable targeting patients who may benefit from interventions aimed at reducing drug-related morbidity. It would support clinicians and hospital pharmacists in selecting patients to deliver a more efficient health care service. This study aimed to develop a prediction model that helps to identify patients on the day of hospital admission who are at increased risk of developing a clinically relevant, preventable adverse drug event during their stay on a surgical ward. METHODS Data of the pre-intervention measurement period of the P-REVIEW study were used. This study was designed to assess the impact of a multifaceted educational intervention on clinically relevant, preventable adverse drug events in surgical patients. Thirty-nine variables were evaluated in a univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis, respectively. Model performance was expressed in the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristics. Bootstrapping was used for model validation. RESULTS 6780 admissions of patients at surgical wards were included during the pre-intervention period of the PREVIEW trial. 102 patients experienced a clinically relevant, adverse drug event during their hospital stay. The prediction model comprised five variables: age, number of biochemical tests ordered, heparin/LMWH in therapeutic dose, use of opioids, and use of cardiovascular drugs. The AUROC was 0.86 (95% CI 0.83-0.88). The model had a sensitivity of 80.4% and a specificity of 73.4%. The positive and negative predictive values were 4.5% and 99.6%, respectively. Bootstrapping generated parameters in the same boundaries. CONCLUSIONS The combined use of a limited set of easily ascertainable patient characteristics can help physicians and pharmacists to identify, at the time of admission, surgical patients who are at increased risk of developing ADEs during their hospital stay. This may serve as a basis for taking extra precautions to ensure medication safety in those patients.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bos JM, Natsch S, van den Bemt PMLA, Pot JLW, Nagtegaal JE, Wieringa A, van der Wilt GJ, De Smet PAGM, Kramers C. A multifaceted intervention to reduce guideline non-adherence among prescribing physicians in Dutch hospitals. Int J Clin Pharm 2017; 39:1211-1219. [PMID: 29101616 PMCID: PMC5694513 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-017-0553-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Despite the potential of clinical practice guidelines to improve patient outcomes, adherence to guidelines by prescribers is inconsistent. Objective The aim of the study was to determine whether an approach of introducing an educational programme for prescribers in the hospital combined with audit and feedback by the hospital pharmacist reduces non-adherence of prescribing physicians to key pharmacotherapeutic guidelines. Setting This prospective intervention study with a before–after design evaluated patients at surgical, urological and orthopaedic wards. Method An educational program covering pain management, antithrombotics, fluid and electrolyte management, prescribing in case of renal insufficiency, application of radiographic contrast agents and surgical antibiotic prophylaxis was presented to prescribers on the participating wards. Hospital pharmacists performed medication safety consultations, combining medication review of patients who are at risk for drug related problems with visits to ward physicians. Main outcome measure The outcome measure was the proportion of the admissions of patients in which the physician did not adhere to one or more of the included guidelines. Difference was expressed in odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed. Results 1435 Admissions of 1378 patients during the usual care period and 1195 admissions of 1090 patients during the intervention period were included. Non-adherence was observed significantly less often during the intervention period [21.8% (193/886)] as compared to the usual care period [30.5% (332/1089)]. The adjusted OR was 0.61 (95% CI 0.49–0.76). Conclusion This study shows that education and support of the prescribing physician can reduce guideline non-adherence at surgical wards.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline M Bos
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Stephanie Natsch
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Johan L W Pot
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - J Elsbeth Nagtegaal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Andre Wieringa
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Gert Jan van der Wilt
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter A G M De Smet
- Department of Pharmacy, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Kramers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Weg door Jonkerbos 100, 6532 SZ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bos JM, van den Bemt PMLA, Kievit W, Pot JLW, Nagtegaal JE, Wieringa A, van der Westerlaken MML, van der Wilt GJ, de Smet PAGM, Kramers C. A multifaceted intervention to reduce drug-related complications in surgical patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 83:664-677. [PMID: 27670813 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2016] [Revised: 08/31/2016] [Accepted: 09/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
AIM The P-REVIEW study was a prospective, multicenter, open intervention study, designed to determine whether a multifaceted intervention of educating the prescriber combined with medication review and pharmaceutical visits to the ward by the hospital pharmacist could lead to a reduction in drug-related complications among surgical patients. METHODS A total of 6780 admissions of 5940 patients to surgical, urological and orthopaedic wards during the usual care period and 6484 admissions of 5711 patients during the intervention period were included. An educational programme covering pain management, antithrombotics, fluid and electrolyte management, prescription in case of renal insufficiency and antibiotics was developed. National and local hospital guidelines were included. Hospital pharmacists performed medication safety consultations, combining medication review of high-risk patients and a visit to the physician on the ward. RESULTS A significantly lower proportion of admissions with one or more clinically relevant, potentially preventable, drug-related problems (including death, temporary or sustained disability, increased length of hospital stay or readmission within 30 days) occurred in the intervention period (1.1% (73/6484) compared to the usual care period [1.6% (106/6780)] (P = 0.029). The relative risk (RR) was 0.72 (95% CI 0.53-0.97). Several types of drug-related problems occurred less frequently. Costs incurred as result of time spent on study-related activities were not different before and after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS The P-REVIEW study shows that education and support of the prescribing physician with respect to high-risk patients in surgical departments leads to a significant, clinically relevant benefit for patients without generating additional costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline M Bos
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Wietske Kievit
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johan L W Pot
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - J Elsbeth Nagtegaal
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, the Netherlands
| | - André Wieringa
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | | | - Gert Jan van der Wilt
- Department of Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Peter A G M de Smet
- Department Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Kramers
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|