1
|
Martens N, Hindori-Mohangoo AD, Hindori MP, Damme AV, Beeckman K, Reis R, Crone MR, van der Kleij RR. Anticipated benefits and challenges of implementing group care in Suriname's maternity and child care sector: a contextual analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:592. [PMID: 37596532 PMCID: PMC10436662 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05904-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suriname is a uppermiddle-income country with a relatively high prevalence of preventable pregnancy complications. Access to and usage of high-quality maternity care services are lacking. The implementation of group care (GC) may yield maternal and child health improvements. However, before introducing a complex intervention it is pivotal to develop an understanding of the local context to inform the implementation process. METHODS A context analysis was conducted to identify local needs toward maternity and postnatal care services, and to assess contextual factor relevant to implementability of GC. During a Rapid Qualitative Inquiry, 63 online and face-to-face semi-structured interviews were held with parents, community members, on-and off-site healthcare professionals, policy makers, and one focus group with parents was conducted. Audio recordings were transcribed in verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis and Framework Method. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research served as a base for the coding tree, which was complemented with inductively derived codes. RESULTS Ten themes related to implementability, one theme related to sustainability, and seven themes related to reaching and participation of the target population in GC were identified. Factors related to health care professionals (e.g., workload, compatibility, ownership, role clarity), to GC, to recipients and to planning impact the implementability of GC, while sustainability is in particular hampered by sparse financial and human resources. Reach affects both implementability and sustainability. Yet, outer setting and attitudinal barriers of health professionals will likely affect reach. CONCLUSIONS Multi-layered contextual factors impact not only implementability and sustainability of GC, but also reach of parents. We advise future researchers and implementors of GC to investigate not only determinants for implementability and sustainability, but also those factors that may hamper, or facilitate up-take. Practical, attitudinal and cultural barriers to GC participation need to be examined. Themes identified in this study will inspire the development of adaptations and implementation strategies at a later stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nele Martens
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Manodj P Hindori
- Foundation for Perinatal Interventions and Research in Suriname (Perisur), Paramaribo, Suriname
| | - Astrid Van Damme
- Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery Research Group (NUMID), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Jette, Belgium
| | - Katrien Beeckman
- Department of Public Health, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Jette, Belgium
- Department of Nursing and Midwifery Research Group (NUMID), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Jette, Belgium
- Centre for Research and Innovation in Care, Universiteit Antwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Ria Reis
- Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Amsterdam, Netherlands
- University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Niessink-Beckers S, Verhoeven CJ, Nahuis MJ, Horvat-Gitsels LA, Gitsels-van der Wal JT. Maternal characteristics associated with referral to obstetrician-led care in low-risk pregnant women in the Netherlands: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0282883. [PMID: 36921011 PMCID: PMC10016726 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Netherlands, maternity care is divided into midwife-led care (for low-risk women) and obstetrician-led care (for high-risk women). Referrals from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care have increased over the past decade. The majority of women are referred during their pregnancy or labour. Referrals are based on a continuous risk assessment of the health and characteristics of mother and child, yet referral for non-medical factors and characteristics remain unclear. This study investigated which maternal characteristics are associated with women's referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective cohort study in one midwife-led care practice in the Netherlands included 1096 low-risk women during January 2015-17. The primary outcomes were referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care in (1) the antepartum period and (2) the intrapartum period. In total, 11 maternal characteristics were identified. Logistic regression models of referral in each period were fitted and stratified by parity. RESULTS In the antepartum period, referral among nulliparous women was associated with an older maternal age (aOR, 1.07; 95%CI, 1.05-1.09), being underweight (0.45; 0.31-0.64), overweight (2.29; 1.91-2.74), or obese (2.65; 2.06-3.42), a preconception period >1 year (1.34; 1.07-1.66), medium education level (0.76; 0.58-1.00), deprivation (1.87; 1.54-2.26), and sexual abuse (1.44; 1.14-1.82). Among multiparous women, a referral was associated with being underweight (0.40; 0.26-0.60), obese (1.61; 1.30-1.98), a preconception period >1 year (1.71; 1.27-2.28), employment (1.38; 1.19-1.61), deprivation (1.23; 1.03-1.46), highest education level (0.63; 0.51-0.80), psychological problems (1.24; 1.06-1.44), and one or multiple consultations with an obstetrician (0.68; 0.58-0.80 and 0.64; 0.54-0.76, respectively). In the intrapartum period, referral among nulliparous women was associated with an older maternal age (1.02; 1.00-1.05), being underweight (1.67; 1.15-2.42), a preconception period >1 year (0.42; 0.31-0.57), medium or high level of education (2.09; 1.49-2.91 or 1.56; 1.10-2.22, respectively), sexual abuse (0.46; 0.33-0.63), and multiple consultations with an obstetrician (1.49; 1.15-1.94). Among multiparous women, referral was associated with an older maternal age (1.02; 1.00-1.04), being overweight (0.65; 0.51-0.83), a preconception period >1 year (0.33; 0.17-0.65), non-Dutch ethnicity (1.98; 1.61-2.45), smoking (0.75; 0.57-0.97), sexual abuse (1.49; 1.09-2.02), and one or multiple consultations with an obstetrician (1.34; 1.06-1.70 and 2.09; 1.63-2.69, respectively). CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study showed that several non-medical maternal characteristics of low-risk pregnant women are associated with referral from midwife-led to obstetrician-led care, and how these differ by parity and partum period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Niessink-Beckers
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- * E-mail:
| | - Corine J. Verhoeven
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maxima Medical Center, Veldhoven, Netherlands
- Division of Midwifery, School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Marleen J. Nahuis
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Noordwest Hospital Group location Alkmaar, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - Lisanne A. Horvat-Gitsels
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, Faculty of Population Health Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crockett AH, Chen L, Heberlein EC, Britt JL, Covington-Kolb S, Witrick B, Doherty E, Zhang L, Borders A, Keenan-Devlin L, Smart B, Heo M. Group vs traditional prenatal care for improving racial equity in preterm birth and low birthweight: the Centering and Racial Disparities randomized clinical trial study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 227:893.e1-893.e15. [PMID: 36113576 PMCID: PMC9729420 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.06.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The United States has persistently high rates of preterm birth and low birthweight and is characterized by significant racial disparities in these rates. Innovative group prenatal care models, such as CenteringPregnancy, have been proposed as a potential approach to improve the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight and to reduce disparities in these pregnancy outcomes. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to test whether participation in group prenatal care would reduce the rates of preterm birth and low birthweight compared with individual prenatal care and whether group prenatal care would reduce the racial disparity in these rates between Black and White patients. STUDY DESIGN This was a randomized controlled trial among medically low-risk pregnant patients at a single study site. Eligible patients were stratified by self-identified race and ethnicity and randomly allocated 1:1 between group and individual prenatal care. The primary outcomes were preterm birth at <37 weeks of gestation and low birthweight of <2500 g. The primary analysis was performed according to the intent-to-treat principle. The secondary analyses were performed according to the as-treated principle using modified intent-to-treat and per-compliance approaches. The analysis of effect modification by race and ethnicity was planned. RESULTS A total of 2350 participants were enrolled, with 1176 assigned to group prenatal care and 1174 assigned to individual prenatal care. The study population included 952 Black (40.5%), 502 Hispanic (21.4%), 863 White (36.8%), and 31 "other races or ethnicity" (1.3%) participants. Group prenatal care did not reduce the rate of preterm birth (10.4% vs 8.7%; odds ratio, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.92-1.63; P=.17) or low birthweight (9.6% vs 8.9%; odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.80-1.45; P=.62) compared with individual prenatal care. In subgroup analysis, greater attendance in prenatal care was associated with lower rates of preterm birth and low birthweight. This effect was most noticeable for the rates of low birthweight for Black participants in group care: intent to treat (51/409 [12.5%]), modified intent to treat (36/313 [11.5%]), and per compliance (20/240 [8.3%]). Although the rates of low birthweight were significantly higher for Black participants than White participants seen in individual care (adjusted odds ratio, 2.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-3.50), the difference was not significant for Black participants in group care compared with their White counterparts (adjusted odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-3.34). CONCLUSION There was no difference in the overall rates of preterm birth or low birthweight between group and individual prenatal care. With increased participation in group prenatal care, lower rates of preterm birth and low birthweight for Black participants were observed. The role of group care models in reducing racial disparities in these birth outcomes requires further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy H Crockett
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health and the University of South Carolina School of Medicine, Greenville, SC.
| | - Liwei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Emily C Heberlein
- Georgia Health Policy Center, Andrew Young School of Policy Studies, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA
| | - Jessica L Britt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prisma Health, Greenville, SC
| | - Sarah Covington-Kolb
- Center for Community Health Alignment, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
| | - Brian Witrick
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Emily Doherty
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Lu Zhang
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| | - Ann Borders
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Lauren Keenan-Devlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Britney Smart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL
| | - Moonseong Heo
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social, and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lazar J, Boned-Rico L, Olander EK, McCourt C. A systematic review of providers' experiences of facilitating group antenatal care. Reprod Health 2021; 18:180. [PMID: 34493314 PMCID: PMC8425020 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-021-01200-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Group antenatal care is a rapidly expanding alternative antenatal care delivery model. Research has shown it to be a safe and effective care model for women, but less is known about the perspectives of the providers leading this care. This systematic review examined published literature that considered health care professionals’ experiences of facilitating group antenatal care. Methods Systematic searches were conducted in seven databases (Cinahl, Medline, Psychinfo, Embase, Ovid Emcare, Global Health and MIDRS) in April 2020. Qualitative or mixed methods studies with a significant qualitative component were eligible for inclusion if they included a focus on the experiences of health care providers who had facilitated group antenatal care. Prisma screening guidelines were followed and study quality was critically appraised by three independent reviewers. The findings were synthesised thematically. Results Nineteen papers from nine countries were included. Three main themes emerged within provider experiences of group antenatal care. The first theme, ‘Giving women the care providers feel they want and need’, addresses richer use of time, more personal care, more support, and continuity of care. The second theme, ‘Building skills and relationships’, highlights autonomy, role development and hierarchy dissolution. The final theme, ‘Value proposition of group antenatal care’, discusses provider investment and workload. Conclusions Health care providers’ experience of delivering group antenatal care was positive overall. Opportunities to deliver high-quality care that benefits women and allows providers to develop their professional role were appreciated. Questions about the providers’ perspectives on workload, task shifting, and the structural changes needed to support the sustainability of group antenatal care warrant further exploration. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01200-0. Receiving antenatal care in a group setting has been found to be safe and satisfying for women and is supported by international public health guidelines. However, questions remain about the experience of health care professionals tasked with providing this model, such as whether they like working in this model and whether they support its expansion. To answer these questions, the team searched for studies about the experiences of health care providers with group antenatal care, and only included those studies where providers themselves spoke about their own experiences of providing this kind of care. Our review demonstrated that midwives, doctors, nurses and community health workers mostly enjoyed facilitating group antenatal care. They particularly appreciated the ability to give women the kind of care they felt women want and need. Health care providers also experienced some changes in their professional roles, in relation to both the women they serve and their colleagues and organizations. In order to determine if group antenatal care models are a satisfying and sustainable option for health care professionals in the long term, more research is needed.
Collapse
|
5
|
Tsiamparlis-Wildeboer AHC, Feijen-De Jong EI, Scheele F. Factors influencing patient education in shared medical appointments: Integrative literature review. Patient Educ Couns 2020; 103:1667-1676. [PMID: 32376140 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2019] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This integrative literature review investigates the factors influencing patient education in Shared Medical Appointments. METHODS Following template analysis method, we used key concepts of the Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and Social Constructivism as a priori themes. After detailed analysis of the included studies, we deduced subthemes, forming a final template. Based on this final template, we analysed our data again as a final check. RESULTS We included 22 studies. We found that the factors feeling of bonding, humour, feeling of safety, access to information, time, relationship participants-staff, modelling and self-regulation influence the education of SMA participants. Furthermore, we found that health care providers function both as leaders and peers. CONCLUSION We found eight factors that influence the education of SMA participants. Health care providers exert influence on these factors, but in turn, they are also influenced by them in their transfer of knowledge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS In order to create a climate of learning and to promote transfer of knowledge, these eight factors should be considered. Health care providers should be aware of their roles and they might need some extra skills for their leadership roles. This can also lead to practical implications for the curriculum in medical schools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H C Tsiamparlis-Wildeboer
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands; AVAG (Academy Midwifery Amsterdam and Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Esther I Feijen-De Jong
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Midwifery Science, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of General Practice & Elderly Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands; AVAG (Academy Midwifery Amsterdam and Groningen), Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Fedde Scheele
- Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Athena Institute for Transdisciplinary Research, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cadée F, Nieuwenhuijze MJ, Lagro-Janssen ALM, de Vries R. Paving the way for successful twinning:: Using grounded theory to understand the contribution of twin pairs in twinning collaborations. Women Birth 2020; 34:14-21. [PMID: 32089457 DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 01/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Twinning collaborations, where two groups - from educational institutions, hospitals or towns - work together cross-culturally on joint goals, are increasingly common worldwide. Pairing up individuals, so-called twin pairs, is thought to contribute to successful collaboration in twinning projects, but as yet, there is no empirical evidence or theory that offers insight into the value of the pair relationship for twinning. AIM To explore the contribution of one-to-one relationships between twins to twinning projects, as exemplified in projects between Dutch and Moroccan, and Dutch and Sierra Leone midwives. METHODS We conducted thirteen in-depth interviews with midwives from two twinning collaborations. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using an iterative, grounded theory process, yielding a theoretical understanding of one-to-one twinning relationships for twinning collaborations. FINDINGS Participant comments fell into four substantive categories: 1) Being named a twin, 2) moving beyond culture to the personal level, 3) searching for common ground to engage, 4) going above and beyond the twinning collaboration. Their interplay demonstrates the value of twin pairs in paving the way for successful twinning. DISCUSSION A complex combination of contextual inequities, personality, and cultural differences affect the twin relationship. Trusting relationships promote effective collaboration, however, as 'trust' cannot be mandated, it must be built by coaching twins in personal flexibility and (cultural) communication. CONCLUSION By offering original insights into the ways twinning relationships are built, our research explores how twin pairs can enhance the success of twinning projects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franka Cadée
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Marianne J Nieuwenhuijze
- Research Centre for Midwifery Science, Zuyd University, Universiteitssingel 60, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - A L M Lagro-Janssen
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Raymond de Vries
- Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine University of Michigan Medical School, North Campus Research Complex, 2800 Plymouth Road, Building 16, 419W, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2800, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koster D, Romijn C, Sakko E, Stam C, Steenhuis N, de Vries D, van Willigen I, Fontein-Kuipers Y. Traumatic childbirth experiences: practice-based implications for maternity care professionals from the woman's perspective. Scand J Caring Sci 2019; 34:792-799. [PMID: 31657049 DOI: 10.1111/scs.12786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore women's traumatic childbirth experiences in order to make maternity care professionals more aware of women's intrapartum care needs. METHOD A qualitative exploratory study with a constant comparison/grounded theory design was performed. Thirty-six interviews were conducted with women who had given birth in a Dutch birth setting. FINDINGS Three themes, playing a profound role in the occurrence of traumatic birth experiences, emerged: (i) lack of information and consent - maternity care professionals' unilateral decision making during intrapartum care, lacking informed-consent. (ii) feeling excluded - women's mal-adaptive response to the healthcare professionals's one-sided decision making, leaving women feeling distant and estranged from the childbirth event and the experience. (iii) discrepancies - inconsistency between women's expectations and the reality of labour and birth - on an intrapersonal level. CONCLUSION Women's intrapartum care needs cohere with the concept of woman-centred care, including personalised care and reflecting humanising values. Care should include informed consent and shared decision-making. Maternity care professionals need to continuously evaluate whether the woman is consistently part of her own childbearing process. Maternity care professionals should maintain an ongoing dialogue with the woman, including women's internalised ideas of birth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Koster
- Women's Counselling & Theray Services, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Chantal Romijn
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elvira Sakko
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Catelijne Stam
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nienke Steenhuis
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle de Vries
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ilze van Willigen
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne Fontein-Kuipers
- Research Centre Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.,School of Midwifery, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Rijnders M, Jans S, Aalhuizen I, Detmar S, Crone M. Women-centered care: Implementation of CenteringPregnancy® in The Netherlands. Birth 2019; 46:450-460. [PMID: 30592082 DOI: 10.1111/birt.12413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2018] [Revised: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In response to a relatively high perinatal mortality rate in The Netherlands, the Dutch Health Ministry recommended changes to maternity care, opening a pathway toward more integrated woman-centered services. Because of its potential to positively influence risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes, CenteringPregnancy (CP) group prenatal care was implemented. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study (n = 2318) and survey on women's experiences (n = 222) in eight primary care midwifery practices to investigate outcome differences between CP and traditional individual prenatal care. Data from the period 2011-2013 were analyzed. RESULTS Primiparous and multiparous CP women attended more prenatal care visits compared with women who received individual care (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.23 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-1.29] and 1.29 [1.21-1.36]). Fewer primiparous CP women used pain relief during labor (0.56 [0.43-0.73]), and they initiated breastfeeding more often (1.74 [1.15-2.62]). Women participating in CP were more likely to feel that their wishes with respect to medication use (69.1% vs 54.4%, P = 0.039), physical activities (72.8% vs 52.5%, P = 0.008), and relaxation exercises (67.9% vs 35.6%, P ≤ 0.001) were listened to by care providers. They also felt more supported to actively participate in their care (89.6% vs 68.5%, P = 0.001) and felt more able to voice opinions about care (92.7% vs 73.9%, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS The CP model is a good approach aligning with Dutch policy calling for women-centered care and responding to the needs of pregnant women. This study supports CP scale-up in The Netherlands and adds to the pool of international knowledge about CP implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Suze Jans
- Department of Child Health, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Symone Detmar
- Department of Child Health, TNO, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sapp JE, Torre DM, Larsen KL, Holmboe ES, Durning SJ. Trust in Group Decisions: a scoping review. BMC Med Educ 2019; 19:309. [PMID: 31412860 PMCID: PMC6693175 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-019-1726-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/24/2019] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Trust is a critical component of competency committees given their high-stakes decisions. Research from outside of medicine on group trust has not focused on trust in group decisions, and "group trust" has not been clearly defined. The purpose was twofold: to examine the definition of trust in the context of group decisions and to explore what factors may influence trust from the perspective of those who rely on competency committees through a proposed group trust model. METHODS The authors conducted a literature search of four online databases, seeking articles published on trust in group settings. Reviewers extracted, coded, and analyzed key data including definitions of trust and factors pertaining to group trust. RESULTS The authors selected 42 articles for full text review. Although reviewers found multiple general definitions of trust, they were unable to find a clear definition of group trust and propose the following: a group-directed willingness to accept vulnerability to actions of the members based on the expectation that members will perform a particular action important to the group, encompassing social exchange, collective perceptions, and interpersonal trust. Additionally, the authors propose a model encompassing individual level factors (trustor and trustee), interpersonal interactions, group level factors (structure and processes), and environmental factors. CONCLUSIONS Higher degrees of trust at the individual and group levels have been associated with attitudinal and performance outcomes, such as quality of group decisions. Developing a deeper understanding of trust in competency committees may help these committees implement more effective and meaningful processes to make collective decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason E. Sapp
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
- Department of Medicine, Tripler Army Medical Center, 1 Jarrett White Rd, Tripler AMC, HI 96859 USA
| | - Dario M. Torre
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
| | - Kelsey L. Larsen
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
| | - Eric S. Holmboe
- Milestones Development and Evaluation, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical, Education, Suite 2000, 401 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
| | - Steven J. Durning
- Department of Medicine, Division of Health Professions Education, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Rd, Bethesda, MD 20814 USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lori JR, Chuey M, Munro-Kramer ML, Ofosu-Darkwah H, Adanu RMK. Increasing postpartum family planning uptake through group antenatal care: a longitudinal prospective cohort design. Reprod Health 2018; 15:208. [PMID: 30558677 PMCID: PMC6296041 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-018-0644-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2018] [Accepted: 11/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite significant improvements, postpartum family planning uptake remains low for women in sub-Saharan Africa. Transmitting family planning education in a comprehensible way during antenatal care (ANC) has the potential for long-term positive impact on contraceptive use. We followed women for one-year postpartum to examine the uptake and continuation of family planning following enrollment in group versus individual ANC. METHODS A longitudinal, prospective cohort design was used. Two hundred forty women were assigned to group ANC (n = 120) or standard, individual care (n = 120) at their first ANC visit. Principal outcome measures included intent to use family planning immediately postpartum and use of a modern family planning method at one-year postpartum. Additionally, data were collected on intended and actual length of exclusive breastfeeding at one-year postpartum. Pearson chi-square tests were used to test for statistically significant differences between group and individual ANC groups. Odds ratios and adjusted odds ratios were calculated using logistic regression. RESULTS Women who participated in group ANC were more likely to use modern and non-modern contraception than those in individual care (59.1% vs. 19%, p < .001). This relationship improved when controlled for intention, age, religion, gravida, and education (AOR = 6.690, 95% CI: 2.724, 16,420). Women who participated in group ANC had higher odds of using a modern family planning method than those in individual care (AOR = 8.063, p < .001). Those who participated in group ANC were more likely to exclusively breastfeed for more than 6 months than those in individual care (75.5% vs. 50%, p < .001). This relationship remained statistically significant when adjusted for age, religion, gravida, and education (AOR = 3.796, 95% CI: 1.558, 9.247). CONCLUSIONS Group ANC has the potential to be an effective model for improving the uptake and continuation of post-partum family planning up to one-year. Antenatal care presents a unique opportunity to influence the adoption of postpartum family planning. This is the first study to examine the impact of group ANC on family planning intent and use in a low-resource setting. Group ANC holds the potential to increase postpartum family planning uptake and long-term continuation. TRIAL REGISTRATION Not applicable. No health related outcomes reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jody R. Lori
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Meagan Chuey
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | - Michelle L. Munro-Kramer
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, University of Michigan, School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls Bldg, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Sanders PDJ, de Vries PDR, Besseling S, Nieuwenhuijze PDM. ‘Such a waste’ – conflicting communicative roles of Dutch midwifery students in childbirth decision making. Midwifery 2018; 64:115-21. [DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2017] [Revised: 01/16/2018] [Accepted: 06/10/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|