Alternative RNA splicing of the GIT1 gene is associated with neuroendocrine prostate cancer

METTL3 suppresses anlotinib sensitivity by regulating m6A modification of FGFR3 in oral squamous cell carcinoma

Background

N6-methyladenosine (m⁶A) is an abundant nucleotide modification in mRNA, but there were few studies on its role in cancer drug sensitivity and resistance. Anlotinib has been proved to have effective antitumor effects in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) in our previous study. Here, we sought to investigate the treatment target of anlotinib and the function and mechanisms of m⁶A modification in regulating anlotinib effect in OSCC.

Methods

Anlotinib treatment in a dose-dependent manner, western blotting, qRT-PCR and cell lost-of-function assays were used to study the treatment target of anlotinib in OSCC. RNA m⁶A dot blot assays, the m⁶A MeRIP-seq and MeRIP-qPCR, RNA and protein stability assays were used to explore the m⁶A modification of the treatment target of anlotinib. Cell lost-of-function assays after METTL3 depletion were conducted to investigate the effect of m⁶A modification level on the therapeutic effect of anlotinib in OSCC. Patient-derived tumor xenograft (PDX) models and immunohistochemistry staining were performed to study the relationship of METTL3 and antitumor sensitivity of anlotinib in vivo.

Results

Anlotinib targeted FGFR3 in the treatment of OSCC and inhibited tumor cell proliferation and promoted apoptosis by inactivating the FGFR3/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. METTL3 was identified to target and modify FGFR3 m⁶A methylation and then decrease the stability of mRNA. METTL3 expression level was related to the anlotinib sensitivity in OSCC cells in vitro and METTL3 knockdown promoted anlotinib sensitivity of OSCC cells by inhibiting the FGFR3 expression. PDX models samples furthermore showed that METTL3 and FGFR3 levels were tightly correlated with the anlotinib efficacy in OSCC.

Conclusions

In summary, our work revealed that FGFR3 was served as the treatment target of anlotinib and METTL3-mediated FGFR3 m⁶A modification played a critical function in the anlotinib sensitivity in OSCC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02715-7.

Anti-Androgen Receptor Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Brief Update and Perspective

Prostate cancer is a major health issue in western countries and is the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Prostate cancer depends on the androgen receptor (AR), a transcriptional factor critical for prostate cancer growth and progression. Castration by surgery or medical treatment reduces androgen levels, resulting in prostatic atrophy and prostate cancer regression. Thus, metastatic prostate cancers are initially managed with androgen deprivation therapy. Unfortunately, prostate cancers rapidly relapse after castration therapy and progress to a disease stage called castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Currently, clinical treatment for CRPCs is focused on suppressing AR activity with antagonists like Enzalutamide or by reducing androgen production with Abiraterone. In clinical practice, these treatments fail to yield a curative benefit in CRPC patients in part due to AR gene mutations or splicing variations, resulting in AR reactivation. It is conceivable that eliminating the AR protein in prostate cancer cells is a promising solution to provide a potential curative outcome. Multiple strategies have emerged, and several potent agents that reduce AR protein levels were reported to eliminate xenograft tumor growth in preclinical models via distinct mechanisms, including proteasome-mediated degradation, heat-shock protein inhibition, AR splicing suppression, blockage of AR nuclear localization, AR N-terminal suppression. A few small chemical compounds are undergoing clinical trials combined with existing AR antagonists. AR protein elimination by enhanced protein or mRNA degradation is a realistic solution for avoiding AR reactivation during androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancers.

Aggressive variants of prostate cancer: underlying mechanisms of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation

Prostate cancer is a hormone-driven disease and its tumor cell growth highly relies on increased androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Therefore, targeted therapy directed against androgen synthesis or AR activation is broadly used and continually improved. However, a subset of patients eventually progresses to castration-resistant disease. To date, various mechanisms of resistance have been identified including the development of AR-independent aggressive variant prostate cancer based on neuroendocrine transdifferentiation (NED). Here, we review the highly complex processes contributing to NED. Genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional aberrations and posttranscriptional modifications are highlighted and the potential interplay of the different factors is discussed. Background Aggressive variant prostate cancer (AVPC) with traits of neuroendocrine differentiation emerges in a rising number of patients in recent years. Among others, advanced therapies targeting the androgen receptor axis have been considered causative for this development. Cell growth of AVPC often occurs completely independent of the androgen receptor signal transduction pathway and cells have mostly lost the typical cellular features of prostate adenocarcinoma. This complicates both diagnosis and treatment of this very aggressive disease. We believe that a deeper understanding of the complex molecular pathological mechanisms contributing to transdifferentiation will help to improve diagnostic procedures and develop effective treatment strategies. Indeed, in recent years, many scientists have made important contributions to unravel possible causes and mechanisms in the context of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation. However, the complexity of the diverse molecular pathways has not been captured completely, yet. This narrative review comprehensively highlights the individual steps of neuroendocrine transdifferentiation and makes an important contribution in bringing together the results found so far.

Prostate cancer: Alternatively spliced mRNA transcripts in tumor progression and their uses as therapeutic targets

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and second leading cause of cancer deaths among American men. Current therapies show early antitumor responses, but ultimately lead to treatment resistance, relapse and poorer survival in patients. Alternative RNA splicing, a cell mechanism increasing the proteome diversity by producing multiple transcripts from a single gene, has been associated with prostate cancer development/progression. Reports showed that many aberrant mRNA splice variants are upregulated in prostate cancer, promoting malignancy through enhanced proliferation, metastasis, tumor growth, anti-apoptosis, and/or treatment resistance. Here, we discuss the oncogenic properties of aberrant splicing mechanisms underlying prostate cancer pathogenesis, as well as the uses of the splicing variants as potential diagnostics and treatment targets. Finally, we discuss the pharmacologic and molecular approaches for targeting aberrant splicing mechanisms as effective therapies to correct the splicing errors and overcome the drug resistance, ultimately improving the clinical outcome of prostate cancer patients.

Systematic Analysis of Survival-Associated Alternative Splicing Signatures in Thyroid Carcinoma

Alternative splicing (AS) is a key mechanism involved in regulating gene expression and is closely related to tumorigenesis. The incidence of thyroid cancer (THCA) has increased during the past decade, and the role of AS in THCA is still unclear. Here, we used TCGA and to generate AS maps in patients with THCA. Univariate analysis revealed 825 AS events related to the survival of THCA. Five prognostic models of AA, AD, AT, ES, and ME events were obtained through lasso and multivariate analyses, and the final prediction model was established by integrating all the AS events in the five prediction models. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis revealed that the overall survival rate of patients in the high-risk group was significantly shorter than that of patients in the low-risk group. The ROC results revealed that the prognostic capabilities of each model at 3, 5, and 8 years were all greater than 0.7, and the final prognostic capabilities of the models were all greater than 0.9. By reviewing other databases and utilizing qPCR, we verified the established THCA gene model. In addition, gene set enrichment analysis showed that abnormal AS events might play key roles in tumor development and progression of THCA by participating in changes in molecular structure, homeostasis of the cell environment and in cell energy. Finally, a splicing correlation network was established to reveal the potential regulatory patterns between the predicted splicing factors and AS event candidates. In summary, AS should be considered an important prognostic indicator of THCA. Our results will help to elucidate the underlying mechanism of AS in the process of THCA tumorigenesis and broaden the prognostic and clinical application of molecular targeted therapy for THCA.

Many Voices in a Choir: Tumor-Induced Neurogenesis and Neuronal Driven Alternative Splicing Sound Like Suspects in Tumor Growth and Dissemination

Simple Summary

Significant progress has recently been made in understanding the role of the neuronal system in cancer biology, in many solid tumors such as prostate, breast, pancreatic, gastric and brain cancers. Solid tumors and the nervous system appear to influence each other’s development both directly and indirectly. A recurring element in such interactions is constituted by nerve-related substances such as neurotransmitters and neurotrophins, to which the first part of the current review is devoted. The second part of the review focuses on the potential role played by alternative splicing in cancer progression associated with neural signaling. Alternative splicing is the process where pre-mRNA is cut and re-ligated in different ways to give rise to multiple protein isoforms whose expression profile is often cancer specific. Alternative splicing is known to take place in the mRNA of genes that code for proteins involved in neuronal development and the creation of new nerve fibers. The change in alternative splicing patterns that occur as tumors develop and progress may make these splice variants potential targets for the development of drug treatments. They may also serve as diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers.

Abstract

During development, as tissues expand and grow, they require circulatory, lymphatic, and nervous system expansion for proper function and support. Similarly, as tumors arise and develop, they also require the expansion of these systems to support them. While the contribution of blood and lymphatic systems to the development and progression of cancer is well known and is targeted with anticancer drugs, the contribution of the nervous system is less well studied and understood. Recent studies have shown that the interaction between neurons and a tumor are bilateral and promote metastasis on one hand, and the formation of new nerve structures (neoneurogenesis) on the other. Substances such as neurotransmitters and neurotrophins being the main actors in such interplay, it seems reasonable to expect that alternative splicing and the different populations of protein isoforms can affect tumor-derived neurogenesis. Here, we report the different, documented ways in which neurons contribute to the development and progression of cancer and investigate what is currently known regarding cancer-neuronal interaction in several specific cancer types. Furthermore, we discuss the incidence of alternative splicing that have been identified as playing a role in tumor-induced neoneurogenesis, cancer development and progression. Several examples of changes in alternative splicing that give rise to different isoforms in nerve tissue that support cancer progression, growth and development have also been investigated. Finally, we discuss the potential of our knowledge in alternative splicing to improve tumor diagnosis and treatment.

Prognostic significance of survival-associated alternative splicing events in gastric cancer

Alternative splicing events are a major source of transcript and protein diversity in eukaryotes. Aberrant alternative splicing events have been increasingly reported in various cancers, including gastric cancer. To further explore the prognostic significance of alternative splicing events in gastric cancer patients, a comprehensive and systematic investigation was conducted by integrating alternative splicing event data and clinical information. Univariate Cox regression analysis identified 1383 alternative splicing events to be significantly associated with the overall survival of gastric cancer patients. Then, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox analyses were performed for the development of prognostic signatures. The final prognostic signature based on all seven types of alternative splicing events can act as an independent prognostic indicator after multivariate adjustment of several clinical parameters. Furthermore, the correlation and function analysis identified CELF2, BAG2, RBFOX2, PTBP2 and QKI as hub splicing factors, and the focal adhesion signaling pathway was most significantly correlated with survival-associated alternative splicing events. The results of this study may establish a foundation for further research investigating the underlying mechanism of alternative splicing events in the progression of gastric cancer.

Application of magnetic nanoparticles in nucleic acid detection

Nucleic acid is the main material for storing, copying, and transmitting genetic information. Gene sequencing is of great significance in DNA damage research, gene therapy, mutation analysis, bacterial infection, drug development, and clinical diagnosis. Gene detection has a wide range of applications, such as environmental, biomedical, pharmaceutical, agriculture and forensic medicine to name a few. Compared with Sanger sequencing, high-throughput sequencing technology has the advantages of larger output, high resolution, and low cost which greatly promotes the application of sequencing technology in life science research. Magnetic nanoparticles, as an important part of nanomaterials, have been widely used in various applications because of their good dispersion, high surface area, low cost, easy separation in buffer systems and signal detection. Based on the above, the application of magnetic nanoparticles in nucleic acid detection was reviewed.

Understanding aberrant RNA splicing to facilitate cancer diagnosis and therapy

Almost all genes in normal cells undergo alternative RNA splicing to generate a greater extent of diversification of gene products for normal cellular functions. RNA splicing is tightly regulated and closely interplays with genetic and epigenetic machinery. While DNA polymorphism and somatic mutations modulate alternative splicing patterns, RNA splicing also controls genomic stability, chromatin organization, and transcriptome. Tumor cells, in turn, often take advantage of aberrant RNA splicing to develop, grow and progress into therapy-resistant tumors. Understanding alternative RNA splicing in tumor cells would, therefore, provide us opportunities to gain further insights into tumor biology, identify diagnostic or prognosis biomarkers, as well as to design effective therapeutic means to control tumor progression. Here, we provide an overview of RNA splicing mechanisms and use prostate cancer as an example to review recent advancements in our understanding of RNA splicing in cancer progression and therapy resistance. We also discuss emerging diagnostic and therapeutic potentials of RNA splicing events or RNA splicing factors.

Characterization of a Prostate- and Prostate Cancer-Specific Circular RNA Encoded by the Androgen Receptor Gene

The linear mRNAs transcribed under alternative RNA splicing and overexpression/amplification of the androgen receptor (AR) gene are poor prognostic biomarkers of castrate-resistant prostate cancer (PCa). Whether the AR gene also transcribes non-coding circular RNAs that are associated with PCa development and tumor progression remains unclear. Here, we identified and characterized an AR circular RNA, called circAR3, that is widely expressed in PCa cell models and prostate tumors. circAR3 can be secreted into culture media of PCa cell lines and is detectable in the serum from mice bearing PCa xenografts. In PCa patient tissues, circAR3 is highly expressed in benign prostate and hormone naive PCa but downregulated when tumors were treated with neoadjuvant hormone therapy and further reduced when tumors progressed to the castrate-resistant stage. However, circAR3 levels in plasma are extremely low in patients with benign prostate, are upregulated in PCa patients with high Gleason scores and lymph node metastasis, and become undetectable in men after radical prostatectomy. circAR3 does not affect AR signaling, PCa cell proliferation, and invasion rates. Our results demonstrated that the origin of the detectable plasma circAR3 is from the prostate/PCa. Plasma circAR3 may be developed to be a PCa biomarker to monitor PCa development and tumor progression.

Oncogenic splicing abnormalities induced by DEAD-Box Helicase 56 amplification in colorectal cancer

Alternative splicing, regulated by DEAD‐Box Helicase (DDX) families, plays an important role in cancer. However, the relationship between the DDX family and cancer has not been fully elucidated. In the present study, we identified a candidate oncogene DDX56 on Ch.7p by a bioinformatics approach using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset of colorectal cancer (CRC). DDX56 expression was measured by RT‐qPCR and immunochemical staining in 108 CRC patients. Clinicopathological and survival analyses were carried out using three CRC datasets. Biological roles of DDX56 were explored by gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), and cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo, cell cycle assays, and using DDX56‐knockdown or overexpressed CRC cells. RNA sequencing was carried out to elucidate the effect of DDX56 on mRNA splicing. We found that DDX56 expression was positively correlated with the amplification of DDX56 and was upregulated in CRC cells. High DDX56 expression was associated with lymphatic invasion and distant metastasis and was an independent poor prognostic factor. In vitro analysis, in vivo analysis and GSEA showed that DDX56 promoted proliferation ability through regulating the cell cycle. DDX56 knockdown reduced intron retention and tumor suppressor WEE1 expression, which functions as a G2‐M DNA damage checkpoint. We have identified DDX56 as a novel oncogene and prognostic biomarker of CRC that promotes alternative splicing of WEE1.

Alternative RNA splicing of the GIT1 gene is associated with neuroendocrine prostate cancer

Potent androgen receptor pathway inhibition (ARPI) therapies have given rise to a lethal, aggressive subtype of castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) called treatment‐induced neuroendocrine prostate cancer (t‐NEPC). Now, t‐NEPC poses a major clinical problem as approximately 20% of CRPC cases bear this subtype—a rate of occurrence that is predicted to rise with the widespread use of ARPI therapies. Unfortunately, there are no targeted therapies currently available to treat t‐NEPC as the origin and molecular underpinnings of t‐NEPC development remain unclear. In the present study, we identify that RNA splicing of the G protein‐coupled receptor kinase‐interacting protein 1 (GIT1) gene is a unique event in t‐NEPC patients. Specifically, upregulation of the GIT1‐A splice variant and downregulation of the GIT1‐C variant expressions are associated with t‐NEPC patient tumors, patient‐derived xenografts, and cell models. RNA‐binding assays show that RNA splicing of GIT1 is directly driven by SRRM4 and is associated with the neuroendocrine phenotype in CRPC cohorts. We show that GIT1‐A and GIT1‐C regulate differential transcriptomes in prostate cancer cells, where GIT1‐A regulates genes associated with morphogenesis, neural function, environmental sensing via cell‐adhesion processes, and epigenetic regulation. Consistent with our transcriptomic analyses, we report opposing functions of GIT1‐A and GIT1‐C in the stability of focal adhesions, whereby GIT1‐A promotes focal adhesion stability. In summary, our study is the first to report that alternative RNA splicing of the GIT1 gene is associated with t‐NEPC and reprograms its function involving FA‐mediated signaling and cell processes, which may contribute to t‐NEPC development.