Lymphovascular invasion in early gastric cancer: impact of ancillary D2-40 and elastin staining on interobserver agreement

Ensemble Deep Learning Model to Predict Lymphovascular Invasion in Gastric Cancer

Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is one of the most important prognostic factors in gastric cancer as it indicates a higher likelihood of lymph node metastasis and poorer overall outcome for the patient. Despite its importance, the detection of LVI(+) in histopathology specimens of gastric cancer can be a challenging task for pathologists as invasion can be subtle and difficult to discern. Herein, we propose a deep learning-based LVI(+) detection method using H&E-stained whole-slide images. The ConViT model showed the best performance in terms of both AUROC and AURPC among the classification models (AUROC: 0.9796; AUPRC: 0.9648). The AUROC and AUPRC of YOLOX computed based on the augmented patch-level confidence score were slightly lower (AUROC: -0.0094; AUPRC: -0.0225) than those of the ConViT classification model. With weighted averaging of the patch-level confidence scores, the ensemble model exhibited the best AUROC, AUPRC, and F1 scores of 0.9880, 0.9769, and 0.9280, respectively. The proposed model is expected to contribute to precision medicine by potentially saving examination-related time and labor and reducing disagreements among pathologists.

Desmin immunostaining is effective for improving interobserver variability in the depth assessment of the submucosal invasion of colorectal cancers

Tumor depth evaluation is essential for pathological tumor staging because it affects clinical management as an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis in colorectal cancers. However, poor interobserver variability of invasion depth has been reported. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of desmin immunostaining in the histological diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Overall, 63 sets of slides of colorectal cancer stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and desmin were prepared and independently reviewed by four examiners. After reviewing the desmin-stained slides, the interobserver variability of H&E slides alone was significantly improved for all examiners. For the assessment of Tis vs. T1, the sensitivity and accuracy were significantly improved for all examiners by combining H&E and desmin immunostaining. For the diagnosis of T1b vs. Tis or T1a, specificity and accuracy were significantly improved by adding desmin immunostaining. Ancillary desmin staining to assess submucosal invasion in colorectal cancers significantly improved interobserver agreement, led to efficient screening of T1 cancers, and reduced excessive T1b diagnoses. The combination of desmin immunostaining and H&E staining is highly recommended for diagnosing invasive colorectal cancer.

The Usefulness of Elastin Staining to Detect Vascular Invasion in Cancer

Tumor prognosis hinges on accurate cancer staging, a pivotal process influenced by the identification of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), i.e., blood vessel and lymphatic vessel invasion. Protocols by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the World Health Organization (WHO) have been established to assess LVI in various tumor types, including, but not limited to, breast cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), pancreatic exocrine tumors, and thyroid carcinomas. The CAP refers to blood vessel invasion as "angioinvasion" (vascular invasion) to differentiate it from lymphatic vessel invasion (lymphatic invasion). For clarity, the latter terms will be used throughout this review. The presence of lymphatic and/or vascular invasion has emerged as a pivotal prognostic factor; therefore, its accurate identification is crucial not only for staging but also for providing the patient with an honest understanding of his/her prognosis. Given the prognostic importance of the correct identification of LVI, specific staining techniques are employed to distinguish lymphatic vessel invasion from angioinvasion and to differentiate true LVI from artifact. These encompass hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, elastic staining, Factor VIII staining, Ulex europaeus I agglutinin staining, CD31, CD34, D2-40, ERG, and D2-40 (podoplanin) immunohistochemical (IHC) stains among others. Based on a review of numerous publications regarding the efficacy of various methods for LVI detection, elastin staining demonstrated superior accuracy and prognostic value, allowing for more targeted treatment strategies. The clinical significance of accurately detecting LVI cannot be overstated, as it is strongly linked to higher cancer-related mortality and an increased risk of tumor recurrence. This review aims to examine the existing literature on the use of elastin stains in the detection of vascular invasion among different types of tumors and its prognostic value.

Lymphatic and vascular invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma: Implications for recurrence and survival in a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies analyzed lymphovascular invasion (LVI) in various malignant diseases, however, little is known about the role of lymphatic invasion (LI) as well as vascular invasion (VI) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The aim of this study is to illuminate the role of LI and VI in a population-based cohort study.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 745 primarily resected OSCC patients in Eastern Bavaria for histopathologically verified LI and VI. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated, whereas analysis was performed by uni- and multivariate statistics. Mean follow-up time was 7.4 years.

RESULTS

LI was found in 115 patients (15.4%), VI was diagnosed in 23 cases (3.1%). LI correlated significantly with distinct anatomical sites (p = 0.004), increasing pT-classification (p < 0.001), lymph node involvement (p < 0.001), higher grading (p < 0.001), advanced UICC-stages (p < 0.001) and adjuvant therapies (p < 0.001). Similar results were found for VI. Survival analysis resulted in a significantly decreased five-year OS and RFS in patients with diagnosed LI (OS: 41.1%, RFS: 38.3%) in contrast to LI-negative cases (OS: 66.8%, RFS: 59.7.7%, p < 0.001). Analogous outcomes were seen for patients with VI. Additionally, LI was identified as a predictive parameter, indicating individual patients' response to adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSION

This population-based cohort study underlines the unfavorable aspect of LI and VI on outcome in OSCC. Including LI and VI in existing staging systems could help to stratify patients' risk for adverse outcome and consecutively determine adjuvant treatment in malignant disease.