Comparison of the performance of two automatic cell morphology analyzers for peripheral-blood leukocyte morphology analysis: Mindray MC-100i and Sysmex DI-60

Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60

BACKGROUND

The MC-80 (Mindray, Shenzhen, China), a newly available artificial intelligence (AI)-based digital morphology analyzer, is the focus of this study. We aim to compare the leukocyte differential performance of the Mindray MC-80 with that of the Sysmex DI-60 and the gold standard, manual microscopy.

METHODS

A total of 100 abnormal peripheral blood (PB) smears were compared across the MC-80, DI-60, and manual microscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, and efficiency were calculated according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) EP12-A2 guidelines. Comparisons were made using Bland-Altman analysis and Passing-Bablok regression analysis. Additionally, within-run imprecision was evaluated using five samples, each with varying percentages of mature leukocytes and blasts, in accordance with CLSI EP05-A3 guidelines.

RESULTS

The within-run coefficient of variation (%CV) of the MC-80 for most cell classes in the five samples was lower than that of the DI-60. Sensitivities for the MC-80 ranged from 98.2% for nucleated red blood cells (NRBC) to 28.6% for reactive lymphocytes. The DI-60's sensitivities varied between 100% for basophils and reactive lymphocytes, and 11.1% for metamyelocytes. Both analyzers demonstrated high specificity, negative predictive value, and efficiency, with over 90% for most cell classes. However, the DI-60 showed relatively lower specificity for lymphocytes (73.2%) and lower efficiency for blasts and lymphocytes (80.1% and 78.6%, respectively) compared with the MC-80. Bland-Altman analysis indicated that the absolute mean differences (%) ranged from 0.01 to 4.57 in MC-80 versus manual differential and 0.01 to 3.39 in DI-60 versus manual differential. After verification by technicians, both analyzers exhibited a very high correlation (r = 0.90-1.00) with the manual differential results in neutrophils, lymphocytes, and blasts.

CONCLUSIONS

The Mindray MC-80 demonstrated good performance for leukocyte differential in PB smears, notably exhibiting higher sensitivity for blasts identification than the DI-60.

Performance of the digital cell morphology analyzer MC-100i in a multicenter study in tertiary hospitals in China

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the performance of the MC-100i, a pre-commercial digital morphology analyzer utilizing a convolutional neural network algorithm, in a multicentric setting involving up to 11 tertiary hospitals in China.

METHODS

Blood smears were analyzed by MC-100i, verified by morphologists, and manually differentiated. The classification performance on WBCs and RBCs was evaluated by comparing the classification results using different methods. The PLT and PLT clump counting performance was also assessed. The total assay time including hands-on time was evaluated.

RESULTS

The agreements between pre- and post-classification were high for normal WBCs (κ > 0.96) and lower for overall abnormal WBCs (κ = 0.90). The post-classification results correlated well with manual differentials for both normal and abnormal WBCs (r > 0.93), except for basophils (r = 0.8480) and atypical lymphocytes (r = 0.8211). The clinical sensitivity and specificity of each RBC abnormality after verification were above 90 % using microscopy reviews as the reference. The PLTs counted by the MC-100i before and after verification correlated well with those measured by the PLT-O mode (r = 0.98). Moreover, PLT clumps were successfully classified by the analyzer in EDTA-dependent pseudothrombocytopenia blood samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The MC-100i is an accurate and reliable digital cell morphology analyzer, offering another intelligent option for hematology laboratories.