14th International HLA and Immunogenetics Workshop: Report on the Prospective Chronic Rejection Project

Diseases association with the polymorphic major histocompatibility complex class I related chain a: MICA gene

The Major Histocompatibility Complex class I chain-related molecule A (MICA) genes encode a highly polymorphic glycoprotein among the cell surface antigens that trigger an immune response after allograft transplantation. It is encoded by the MICA gene, a member of the glycosylated MIC genes. Discovered in 1994, the MICA gene is located within the MHC class I region. Moreover, its biological function is achieved through the interaction with the NKG2D receptor. Unlike the classical HLA molecules, MICA protein is not associated with β2- microglobulin nor binds peptides. MICA gene expression may result in a cytotoxic response and IFN-γ secretion through the up-regulation by heat shock proteins in response to infection (Human Cytomegalovirus HCMV), mediated by NKG2D-expressing cells. Anti-MICA antibodies were identified as significant risk factors for antibody mediated rejection after being detected in sera of patients with graft rejection. In addition, soluble MICA proteins (sMICA) has been detected in the serum of transplant recipients with cancers. Furthermore, the association of MICA polymorphisms with infectious diseases, various autoimmune diseases, cancer, and allograft rejection or graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) has been studied. Moreover, numerous advanced disease studies centered on MICA polymorphism are independent of HLA association. In this review, we discussed the up-to-date data about MICA and the association of MICA polymorphism with infections, autoimmune diseases, graft-versus-host disease, and cancer.

Routine C4d immunohistochemistry in cardiac allografts: Long-term outcomes

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, C4d has emerged as a potential marker for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR); however, evidence on its use as a prognostic tool has been controversial. Although the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation guideline recommends early routine surveillance of C4d in heart transplantation, there is no consensus on its value in the pathologic assessment of AMR. Herein we present a correlation analysis of C4d immunoreactivity in endomyocardial biopsies with clinical cardiac dysfunction, cellular rejection, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) status, cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and death.

METHODS

A total of 5,840 endomyocardial biopsies from 296 heart transplant recipients (January 2004 to December 2014) were stained prospectively for C4d. Strong, diffuse endothelial staining was considered positive. All patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. Positive C4d staining was present in 53 biopsies from 28 patients. Sixteen of 28 patients had clinically significant cardiac dysfunction at the time of positive biopsy. In C4d-positive patients, the mean panel-reactive antibody (PRA) level was 33%. Ten patients demonstrated a first C4d positivity within the first year post-transplant, whereas 18 patients had C4d positivity after 1 year post-transplant. At autopsy, all 11 C4d-positive patients examined demonstrated cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) as the underlying cause of death. In contrast, only 2 of 8 (25%) C4d-negative patients had CAV at autopsy. In the surviving cohort, there was an angiographic diagnosis of higher-than-moderate CAV in 10 patients (3.8%).

RESULTS

C4d-positive patients contributed to 67% of the overall institutional mortality in heart transplant recipients. Late C4d positivity (>1 year post-transplant) demonstrated an even higher risk for developing CAV and poor prognosis than early C4d positivity (within 1 year). In the C4d-negative group with postmortem examination, 75% (6 of 8) deaths were due to non-cardiac causes.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show a positive association of C4d with CAV and death. We identified a prognostic role for C4d in heart transplantation warranting routine long-term detection of this marker in the pathologic evaluation of cardiac AMR.

Associations of HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C alleles frequency with prevalence of herpes simplex virus infections and diseases across global populations: implication for the development of an universal CD8+ T-cell epitope-based vaccine

A significant portion of the world's population is infected with herpes simplex virus type 1 and/or type 2 (HSV-1 and/or HSV-2), that cause a wide range of diseases including genital herpes, oro-facial herpes, and the potentially blinding ocular herpes. While the global prevalence and distribution of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections cannot be exactly established, the general trends indicate that: (i) HSV-1 infections are much more prevalent globally than HSV-2; (ii) over a half billion people worldwide are infected with HSV-2; (iii) the sub-Saharan African populations account for a disproportionate burden of genital herpes infections and diseases; (iv) the dramatic differences in the prevalence of herpes infections between regions of the world appear to be associated with differences in the frequencies of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) alleles. The present report: (i) analyzes the prevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections across various regions of the world; (ii) analyzes potential associations of common HLA-A, HLA-B and HLA-C alleles with the prevalence of HSV-1 and HSV-2 infections in the Caucasoid, Oriental, Hispanic and Black major populations; and (iii) discusses how our recently developed HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C transgenic/H-2 class I null mice will help validate HLA/herpes prevalence associations. Overall, high prevalence of herpes infection and disease appears to be associated with high frequency of HLA-A(∗)24, HLA-B(∗)27, HLA-B(∗)53 and HLA-B(∗)58 alleles. In contrast, low prevalence of herpes infection and disease appears to be associated with high frequency of HLA-B(∗)44 allele. The finding will aid in developing a T-cell epitope-based universal herpes vaccine and immunotherapy.

Anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies in liver transplant recipients: effect on long-term graft survival

Objective. Presence of anti-HLA antibodies has a well-known impact on kidney grafts survival; however their role in liver transplantation has not been fully elucidated. We conducted a 7-year prospective study to show correlation between presence of anti-HLA and anti-MICA antibodies and liver graft survival. Methods. Blood samples from 123 liver transplant recipients were collected during patients routine visits. Time from transplantation to blood sample collection was different for each patient. Blood samples were tested for anti-HLA (separately class I and II) and MICA antibodies using Luminex assays. Results. There were 32 (26%) patients with positive anti-HLA and 37 (30%) with positive anti-MICA antibodies. Graft loss occurred in 7 cases (23%) in anti-HLA positive group compared to 20 (22%) in anti-HLA negative group (P = ns) and in 8 cases (22%) in anti-MICA positive group but 19 (23%) in anti-MICA negative group (P = ns). No correlations were detected between presence of antibodies and acute graft rejection (AGR). Presence of any antibodies (anti-HLA or anti-MICA antibodies) correlated with late graft rejection (P = 0.04). Conclusion. Presence of anti-HLA or anti-MICA had no impact on long-term liver graft survival; however, detection of any antibodies was correlated with episodes of late graft rejection.

Effector mechanisms of rejection

Organ transplantation appears today to be the best alternative to replace the loss of vital organs induced by various diseases. Transplants can, however, also be rejected by the recipient. In this review, we provide an overview of the mechanisms and the cells/molecules involved in acute and chronic rejections. T cells and B cells mainly control the antigen-specific rejection and act either as effector, regulatory, or memory cells. On the other hand, nonspecific cells such as endothelial cells, NK cells, macrophages, or polymorphonuclear cells are also crucial actors of transplant rejection. Last, beyond cells, the high contribution of antibodies, chemokines, and complement molecules in graft rejection is discussed in this article. The understanding of the different components involved in graft rejection is essential as some of them are used in the clinic as biomarkers to detect and quantify the level of rejection.

Vaccination against Streptococcus pneumoniae does not induce antibodies against HLA or MICA in clinically stable kidney transplant recipients

There are concerns in the community that immune activation after vaccination could lead to (subclinical) rejection. Our aim was to define if pneumococcal vaccination induced HLA antibodies using highly sensitive methods. Forty-nine kidney transplant recipients were immunized with Pneumovax 23. The median interval between transplantation and vaccination was 6.5 years, the median serum creatinine concentration 1.3, 1.3 and 1.4 mg/dL pre-vaccination, at month 1 and 15 post-vaccination, respectively. In none of the patients biopsy-proven acute rejection was diagnosed within three years post-vaccination. Pneumococcal, HLA class I and II and major histocompatibility class I-related chain A (MICA) antibodies were determined by Luminex™ technology (xMAP™ Pneumococcal Immunity Panel and LABScreen™ Mixed beads, respectively) and HLA antibodies also by ELISA (Lambda Antigen Tray™). While pneumococcal antibodies were significantly higher at month 1 and 15 post- vs. pre-vaccination (p<0.0001 each), HLA/MICA antibodies remained unchanged as determined by Luminex™ and ELISA. Positive Luminex™ reactions were present in 63%, 67% and 63% (HLA class I), 47%, 47% and 55% (HLA class II) and 29%, 29% and 29% (MICA) pre-vaccination, at month 1 and 15, respectively. In clinically stable kidney transplant recipients there is no evidence for an increase in HLA antibodies after pneumococcal vaccination.

Antibodies, isotypes and complement in allograft rejection. Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2008;13:411-418. [PMID: 18685338 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0b013e3283028312]

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Classical complement activation is a key step in the process of antibody-mediated rejection. Emphasizing novel diagnostic strategies, this study will discuss recent studies highlighting the particular relevance of alloantibodies with complement-fixing ability.

RECENT FINDINGS

Reinforcing the pivotal role of complement, numerous studies have shown tight associations of capillary C4d deposition, a 'footprint' of alloantibody-triggered complement activation, with the occurrence of allograft injury. Distribution patterns of immunoglobulin isotypes or subclasses, which strongly differ in their ability to activate complement, may not adequately reflect the actual pathogenetic relevance of detected allosensitization. This fact may be explained by the finding that other variables, such as antibody-binding density or a synergism of antibodies against different epitopes of the same antigen, may contribute to complement activation. An attractive approach to distinguish between complement-fixing and presumably less harmful noncomplement-fixing alloreactivities could be the detection of C4d deposition in vitro. Applying such techniques, recent studies have shown that human leukocyte antigen reactivity with C4d-fixing ability, in contrast to noncomplement-fixing sensitization, may strongly predict antibody-mediated rejection and inferior graft survival.

SUMMARY

Considering the pivotal role of complement, technologies that uncover the complement-fixing ability of alloantibodies may be of particular interest for the selective detection of deleterious sensitization.

HLA tissue typing has no effect on the outcome of patients undergoing a living-donor liver transplant: a single-center experience in Egypt

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effect of human leukocyte antigen tissue typing on outcome of live-donor liver transplant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty recipients underwent live-donor liver transplant in the Dar Al-Fouad Hospital in Egypt and were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were classified into 2 groups: those with human leukocyte antigen +ve, and those with human leukocyte antigen -ve and donors. Hepatitis C virus-related end-stage liver disease was the main indication for transplant. Demographic data, preoperative laboratory data, results of human leukocyte antigen tissue typing, Child score, model for end-stage liver disease score, graft/recipient weight-ratio, ischemia times, surgical complications, postoperative laboratory data, liver biopsy, immunosuppression, and pulse steroids were collected. Graft and patient survivals were studied using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The mean model end-stage liver disease score was 18 ± 3.61 in group 1 and 17.73 ± 3.72 in group 2, with no significant difference. Graft/recipient weight ratio, ischemia times, and postoperative complications showed P = NS. Cyclosporine and tacrolimus were used in 5/9, 8/41, and 4/9 in group 1, and 32/41 in group 2 (P = NS). Rejection and pulse steroids were reported in 3/9 and 12/41 of group 1, and 3/12 and 11/41 of group 2 (P = NS). Hepatitis C virus-recurrence was diagnosed in 5/9 of patients (55%) and 8/41 of patients (29.5%) in groups 1 and 2 (P < .05). No statistical difference was found regarding mortality; 5-year patient and graft survival was 35/50 (70% in group 1 [human leukocyte antigen +ve]), 7/9 (77.8%), and 28/41 in group 2 (68.3%) (human leukocyte antigen -ve).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive human leukocyte antigen typing before live-donor liver transplant has no effect on the incidence of postoperative complications, rejection episodes, and patient or graft survival. Recipients with positive human leukocyte antigen typing may have increased risk of hepatitis C virus-recurrence after live-donor liver transplant.

Efficacy and safety of early cyclosporine conversion to sirolimus with continued MMF-four-year results of the Postconcept study

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) withdrawal has been used as a strategy to improve renal allograft function. We previously reported that conversion from cyclosporine A (CsA) to sirolimus (SRL) 3 months after transplantation significantly improved renal function at 1 year. In the Postconcept trial, 77 patients in the SRL group and 85 in the CsA group were followed for 48 months. Renal function (Cockcroft and Gault) was significantly better at month 48 (M48) in the SRL group both in the intent-to-treat population (ITT): 62.6 mL/min/1.73 m(2) versus 57.1 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.013) and in the on-treatment population (OT): 67.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) versus 57.4 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.002). Two biopsy proven acute rejection episodes occurred after M12 in each group. Graft and patient survival were comparable (graft survival: 97.4 vs. 100%; patient survival: 97.4 vs. 97.6%, respectively). The incidence of new-onset diabetes was numerically increased in the SRL group (7 vs. 2). In OT, three cancers occurred in the SRL group versus nine in the CsA group and mean proteinuria was increased in the SRL group (0.42 ± 0.44 vs. 0.26 ± 0.37; p = 0.018). In summary, the renal benefits associated with conversion of CsA to SRL, at 3 months posttransplantation, in combination with MMF were maintained for 4 years posttransplantation.

The effect of MICA antigens on transplant outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Human major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene A (MICA) is reportedly associated with poor transplant outcomes and a high risk of acute and chronic rejection in solid organ transplantation. However, studies on these risks have found conflicting results. In order to identify areas in which additional research is needed, we have undertaken the first systematic review of evidence concerning the risk of anti-MICA antibodies in recipients' sera.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for original reports of clinical studies involving detection of MICA abs in transplant recipients' sera which used survival rate, acute rejection, and/or chronic rejection as outcome measures. RevMan 5.0.15 was used to calculate relative risk (RR), odds ratios (ORs), and 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs).

RESULTS

We found 18 relevant articles, with a total of 6,607 recipients. Follow-up duration ranged from 1 to 15 years. In studies with more than 2 years of follow-up, anti-MICA abs positive in kidney recipients' post-transplant sera was associated with a lower graft survival rate (4 years: RR = 2.04, 95%CI 1.30 to 3.22; 3 years: OR = 3.56, 95%CI 1.47 to 8.62; 2 years: RR = 2.17, 95%CI 1.09 to 4.31) and a higher acute rejection rate (RR = 1.92, 95%CI 1.27 to 2.91), but there was no clear association with chronic rejection. Similar conclusions could not be drawn for heart or liver transplantation due to possible confounding by anti-HLA abs and the small sample sizes of the available studies.

CONCLUSION

Anti-MICA antibodies in recipients' sera may associated with poor graft survival rates and high risk of acute and chronic rejection in solid organ transplantation, but more rigorous studies are needed to confirm or refute this relationship. Current immunosuppressive therapy may fail to suppress the harmful effect of MICA antigens.

Surveillance of alloantibodies after transplantation identifies the risk of chronic rejection

The monitoring of the levels of alloantibodies following transplantation might facilitate early diagnosis of chronic rejection (CR), the leading cause of renal allograft failure. Here, we used serial alloantibody surveillance to monitor patients with preoperative positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM). Sixty-nine of 308 renal transplant patients in our center had preoperative positive FCXM. Blood was collected quarterly during the first postoperative year and tested by FCXM and single antigen bead luminometry, more sensitive techniques than complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatching. Distinct post-transplant profiles emerged and were associated with different clinical outcomes. Two-thirds of patients showed complete elimination of FCXM and solid-phase assay reactions within 1 year, had few adverse events, and a 95% 3-year graft survival. In contrast, the remaining third failed to eliminate flow FCXM or solid-phase reactions directed against HLA class I or II antibodies. The inferior graft survival (67%) with loss in this latter group was primarily due to CR. Thus, systematic assessment of longitudinal changes in alloantibody levels, either by FCXM or solid-phase assay, can help identify patients at greater risk of developing CR.

[Rejection of kidney graft: mechanism and prevention]

Rejection occurs after the introduction of a genetically different graft, in a recipient. Nowadays, it is still a major obstacle in renal transplantation and reflects a normal protective immune response of a recipient against a foreign antigen. Involving many mechanisms of the innate and adaptive immunity, this reaction results in renal parenchymal lesions witch may progress to graft destruction and loss of its function. Several ways are currently used to reduce the action of the immune system and consequently reduce the risk of rejection. After a presentation of the main actors and the sequence of events leading to rejection, we will describe the strategy used by antirejection teams' transplantation. We will successively consider the prevention (pre-transplant immunological assessment, preventive immunosuppressive therapy), the monitoring (search for antibodies, biopsies) and the treatment.

The role of HIF-1 in up-regulating MICA expression on human renal proximal tubular epithelial cells during hypoxia/reoxygenation

Background

Human major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) plays a dual role in adaptive and innate immune responses. Increasing evidence demonstrates that MICA is closely correlated with acute and chronic kidney allograft rejection. Therefore, understanding the activation mechanisms of MICA is important in kidney transplantation. We previously demonstrated that ischemia/reperfusion injury (IRI) could up-regulate MICA expression on mouse kidney allografts. Since hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) is the master regulator of cellular adaptive responses to hypoxia during IRI, here we investigate whether HIF-1 could up-regulate MICA expression and its influence on NK cell cytotoxicity.

Results

We find that HIF-1alpha plays an important role in up-regulating MICA expression, inducing IFNgamma secretion and NK cell cytotoxicity during hypoxia/reoxygenation. First, we generated a HIF-1alphaDELTAODD-expressing adenovirus to stably and functionally express HIF-1alpha in human renal proximal tubular epithelial (HK-2) cells under normoxia conditions. HIF-1alpha over-expression in HK-2 cells induces MICA expression and enhances NK cell cytotoxic activity towards cells that express HIF-1alpha. Second, we used a hypoxia/reoxygenation cell model to simulate IRI in vitro and found that the suppression of HIF-1alpha by RNAi induces down-regulation of MICA expression and inhibits NK cytotoxicity. In antibody blocking experiments, an anti-MICA mAb was able to down-regulate NK cell cytotoxic activity towards HK-2 cells that over-expressed HIF-1alpha. Moreover, when NK cells were co-cultured with the HK-2 cells expressing MICA, which was up-regulated by over-expression of HIF-1alpha, there was a significant increase in the secretion of IFNgamma. In the presence of the blocking MICA mAb, IFNgamma secretion was significantly decreased.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate that hypoxia/reoxygenation-promoted MICA expression on HK-2 cells is through a HIF-1 pathway. The increased IFNgamma secretion and enhanced NK cell cytotoxicity was mainly due to the surface expression of MICA induced by over-expression of HIF-1alpha. This study enhances our understanding of MICA activation mechanisms during kidney transplantation and provides insights into how IRI can influence transplant outcome. Moreover, these findings might be also important for developing strategies to reduce the effect of MICA in kidney transplant outcomes in the future.

Impact of human leukocyte antigen mismatching on outcomes of liver transplantation: A meta-analysis

AIM: To assess the effect of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatching on liver graft outcome and acute rejection from a meta-analysis of available cohort studies.

METHODS: Articles in PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane database from January 1970 to June 2009, including non-English literature identified in these databases, were searched. Only studies comparing HLA or sub-phenotype matching with mismatching were extracted. The percentage of graft survival was extracted by “Engauge Digitizer” from survival curves if the raw data were not displayed. A meta-analysis was performed when at least 3 studies provided data.

RESULTS: Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. A lower number of HLA mismatches (0-2 vs 3-6) did reduce the incidence of acute rejection (relative risk: 0.77, P = 0.03). The degree of HLA mismatching (0-2 vs 3-6) had no significant effect on 1-year [hazard ratio (HR): 1.04, P = 0.68] and 5-year (HR: 1.09, P = 0.38) graft survival. In sub-phenotype analysis, the degree of HLA-A, B and DR mismatching (0 vs 1-2) had no significant effect on 1-year and 5-year graft survival, either. The HRs and P-values were 0.95, 0.71 (HLA-A, 1-year); 1.06, 0.60 (HLA-A, 5-year); 0.77, 0.16 (HLA-B, 1-year); 1.07, 0.56 (HLA-DR, 1-year); 1.18, 0.23 (HLA-DR, 5-year), respectively.

CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review imply that good HLA compatibility can reduce the incidence of acute rejection in spite of having no influence on graft outcomes. To obtain a short recovery time and minimize rejection post transplantation, HLA matching studies should be considered before the operation.

Development of a cross-platform biomarker signature to detect renal transplant tolerance in humans

Identifying transplant recipients in whom immunological tolerance is established or is developing would allow an individually tailored approach to their posttransplantation management. In this study, we aimed to develop reliable and reproducible in vitro assays capable of detecting tolerance in renal transplant recipients. Several biomarkers and bioassays were screened on a training set that included 11 operationally tolerant renal transplant recipients, recipient groups following different immunosuppressive regimes, recipients undergoing chronic rejection, and healthy controls. Highly predictive assays were repeated on an independent test set that included 24 tolerant renal transplant recipients. Tolerant patients displayed an expansion of peripheral blood B and NK lymphocytes, fewer activated CD4+ T cells, a lack of donor-specific antibodies, donor-specific hyporesponsiveness of CD4+ T cells, and a high ratio of forkhead box P3 to alpha-1,2-mannosidase gene expression. Microarray analysis further revealed in tolerant recipients a bias toward differential expression of B cell-related genes and their associated molecular pathways. By combining these indices of tolerance as a cross-platform biomarker signature, we were able to identify tolerant recipients in both the training set and the test set. This study provides an immunological profile of the tolerant state that, with further validation, should inform and shape drug-weaning protocols in renal transplant recipients.

Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chains A and B (MIC A/B): a novel role in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis

Stress-induced soluble major histocompatibility complex class I-related chains A/B (MIC A/B) are increased in chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular malignancy. We investigated the impact of these molecules on liver injury, apoptosis, and fibrosis in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Blood and liver tissue were obtained from 40 patients with NASH undergoing bariatric surgery for obesity. The control group consisted of 10 healthy individuals. We also investigated 10 patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver (NAFL). Polymerase chain reaction was used to measure messenger RNA (mRNA) transcripts of MIC A/B, natural killer cell receptor G2D (NKG2D), CD95/Fas, and tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-death receptor 5 (DR5). Apoptosis was quantified by way of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) (intrahepatic) and M30/M65 (systemic). Liver injury was assessed histopathologically and serologically (alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase). Fibrosis was identified by Sirius red staining, quantitative morphometry, and alpha-smooth muscle actin and collagen 1alpha transcripts. Compared with controls, patients with NASH revealed significant increases in (1) NKG2D mRNA (13.1-fold) and MIC A/B mRNA (3.6-fold and 15.8-fold, respectively); (2) TRAIL-DR5 and CD95/Fas mRNA (2.7-fold and 3.6-fold, respectively); (3) TUNEL-positive hepatocytes (4.0-fold); and (4) M30 and M65 levels (4.6-fold and 3.4-fold, respectively). We found relevant correlations between MIC protein expression rates and NAS and fibrosis stages. In contrast, NKG2D and MIC A/B transcripts were attenuated in patients with NAFL compared with NASH. Histopathologically, NASH patients revealed increased NAS scores, an accumulation of natural killer cells, and 2.7-fold increased hepatic fibrosis by quantitative morphometry.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest an important role for MIC A/B in liver injury. Therapeutic intervention aimed at reducing MIC A/B levels may beneficially affect the progression of NASH.

Unexpected anti-HLA-DR and -DQ alloantibodies after nephrectomy of an HLA-DR and -DQ identical first renal transplant

The development of the single antigen beads assay by Luminex technology enables accurate identification of allele-specific antibodies. Herein, we report the identification of donor-specific HLA-DR and -DQ antibodies in a first kidney transplant recipient who received a DR and DQ identical kidney transplant. The recipient was a non-sensitized, non-transfused male patient suffering from an end-stage renal failure due to focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis. Two weeks after graft nephrectomy, anti-class I (donor-specific and non-donor specific) and class II antibodies were detected. The single antigen beads technique identified class II antibodies directed against DRB3*0202 and HLA-DQB1*0603 alleles. High-resolution class II typing revealed five allelic incompatibilities between donor and recipient. Amino-acid sequence alignment showed why this post-transplant highly immunized patient developed only these two allele-specific antibodies. Minimizing HLA mismatches between donor and recipient is important, but it is also useful to consider the combination of all HLA molecules present in the donor and recipient in order to define the antibody epitopes responsible for alloantibody responses.

Antibody-mediated rejection: treatment alternatives and outcomes

Over the past 10 years, thanks to the development of sensitive methods of antibody detection and markers of antibody injury such as C4d staining, the role of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and non-HLA alloantibodies as effectors of acute and chronic immune allograft injury has been revisited. Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) defines all allograft rejection caused by antibodies directed against donor-specific HLA molecules, blood group antigen (ABO)-isoagglutinins, or endothelial cell antigens. Antibody-mediated rejection can be a recalcitrant process, resistant to therapy and carries an ominous prognosis to the graft. In concordance with these views, treatment protocols for AMR use permutations of a multiple-prong approach that include (1) the suppression of the T-cell dependent antibody response, (2) the removal of donor reactive antibody, (3) the blockade of the residual alloantibody, and (4) the depletion of naive and memory B-cells. Although all published protocols report a variable rate of success, a major weakness of all current protocols is the lack of effective anti-plasma cell agents. In comparison to acute AMR, the treatment for chronic AMR (CAMR) is not well characterized. Although in acute AMR large titers of pre-existent alloantibodies result in massive activation of the complement system and lytic injury of the graft endothelium, thereby requiring aggressive and fast removal of the offending agents, in CAMR, complement activation results in sublytic endothelial cell injury and activation. Although this type of injury results in chronic graft failure, its slow progression likely renders it amenable of suppression by heightening of maintenance immunosuppression and anti-idiotypic blockade of the circulating alloantibody without the need of plasma exchange. In this review, we will discuss the rationale behind the design of treatment protocols for acute AMR and CAMR as well as their reported results and complications.

Anti-major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A antibodies in organ transplantation

Candidate trigger antigens for alloreactive responses have been appearing continuously in the organ transplant scenario. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A (MICA) is a polymorphic gene family, located near the HLA-B locus on chromosome 6, that encode a 62-kd cell surface glycoprotein. Endothelial cells, in addition to many cell lines, express MICA, whereas resting lymphocytes do not, making this polymorphic molecule a target for both cellular and humoral immune responses. Major histocompatibility complex class I-related chain A antigens are able to elicit the synthesis of alloantibodies in transplant recipients. These antibodies have been found in association with irreversible allograft rejection, an increased frequency of acute rejection episodes, and a significantly lower deceased donor graft survival, as well as in the eluates from rejected grafts. This review summarizes currently available information on MICA in the transplant setting. Undoubtedly, the questions that have surfaced surpass in excess the currently available answers.

Relevance of MICA and other non-HLA antibodies in clinical transplantation

The clinical importance of HLA-specific antibodies for organ allograft outcome is well established. In the past few years, there has been an increasing interest in non-HLA antigens as targets of injury in organ transplant recipients. This increased interest has been spurred by the fact that HLA-identical kidney transplants also undergo immunological rejections. Polymorphisms within non-HLA genes associated with evoking an immune response to alloantigens are currently being studied for their association with transplant outcome. Non-HLA antigens, such as the polymorphic MHC class I-related chain A (MICA), expressed on endothelial cells have been implicated in the pathogenesis of hyperacute, acute and chronic organ allograft rejections. Use of endothelial cells as targets may clarify the specificities of other clinically relevant non-HLA antibodies in graft rejections. This review summarizes past and current knowledge of the clinical importance and specificities of non-HLA antibodies, and mechanisms by which these antibodies may contribute to graft destruction in clinical transplantation. The aims of current research into the role of non-HLA antigens and their genetics in predicting outcome are to develop an improved insight into the basic science of transplantation and to develop a risk or prognostic index for use in the clinical setting. Non-HLA antibody responses are receiving increasing interest in acute and chronic rejection and specificity, affinity, and pathogenicity need to be investigated to estimate their contribution. Undoubtedly, this will continue to be an area of interest in terms of fully understanding the role of non-HLA antigens as targets of immune-mediated injury and the potential for clinical intervention.