1
|
Kikuchi R, Kingston P, Hao A, Sadrolashrafi K, Yamamoto RK, Tolson H, Bilimoria SN, Guo L, Yee D, Ochoa MT, Armstrong AW. Shared decision-making in psoriasis care: Evaluation of how patients' perception of clinicians' delivery of care changes by age and sex. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0303058. [PMID: 38728289 PMCID: PMC11086864 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) refers to a collaborative process in which clinicians assist patients in making medically informed, evidence-based decisions that align with their values and preferences. There is a paucity of literature on SDM in dermatology. OBJECTIVE We aim to assess whether male and female psoriasis patients evaluate their clinicians' engagement in SDM differently across different age groups. METHODS Cross-sectional study using data from the 2014-2017 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPS). RESULTS A weighted total of 7,795,608 psoriasis patients were identified. SDM Scores ranged from 1 to 4, with 4 representing the most favorable patient evaluation of their clinicians' engagement in SDM. We conducted multivariate linear regression to compare mean SDM Scores in male psoriasis patients versus female psoriasis patients across different patient age groups. Female patients ages 60-69 perceived significantly greater clinician engagement in SDM compared to age-matched male patients (female patient perception of SDM 3.65 [95%CI:3.61-3.69] vs. male patient perception of SDM 3.50 [95%CI:3.43-3.58], p<0.005). The same trend of older female patients evaluating their clinicians' engagement in SDM significantly higher than their age-matched male counterparts exists for the age group >70 (p<0.005). No significant differences between male and female patients' evaluations of their clinicians' engagement in SDM were demonstrated in subjects younger than 60. All calculations were adjusted for demographic and clinical factors. CONCLUSIONS Compared to older male psoriasis patients, older female psoriasis patients evaluated their clinicians to be more engaged in shared decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin Kikuchi
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Paige Kingston
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Audrey Hao
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Kaviyon Sadrolashrafi
- Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, Nevada, United States of America
| | - Rebecca K. Yamamoto
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Hannah Tolson
- University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Sara N. Bilimoria
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Lily Guo
- Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Danielle Yee
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Maria T. Ochoa
- Department of Dermatology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - April W. Armstrong
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Scott M, Watermeyer J, Wessels TM. A balancing act: Non-directive communication, risk perceptions, and meeting patient needs in genetic counseling: A South African case study. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:462-472. [PMID: 37323090 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1741] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Genetic counseling (GC) traditionally follows a non-directive counseling approach. Although a cornerstone of GC teaching and theory, there has been debate on whether GC is, can be, or should be a patient-led service due to challenges in practice, as well as the advancement and complexity of genetic testing. Personal risk perceptions and patient expectations within particular contexts may further affect how genetic counselors discuss risk information, even while attempting to remain neutral. Less is known about the process of GC communication in non-Western settings. This paper presents empirical evidence from a South African prenatal GC consultation where tensions become apparent due to differing risk perceptions and expectations between a genetic counselor and a patient, which ultimately impacts non-directive communication practice. The case study forms part of a larger qualitative study focusing on risk and uncertainty communication within GC consultations in Cape Town, South Africa. A blended sociolinguistic approach drawing on principles of conversation analysis (CA) and theme-orientated discourse analysis (TODA) provides evidence of the complexity of imparting risk information and challenging patients to reflect on their decision-making, whilst refraining from sharing personal risk perceptions during everyday practice. The case study demonstrates how a genetic counselor may become implicitly and explicitly directive in their communication approach within the same consult which may reveal their personal risk perceptions on the matter discussed. In addition, the case study reveals how a genetic counselor may grapple with the dilemma of honoring the non-directive guidelines of the profession, whilst simultaneously supporting a patient who requests advice. The ongoing debate on non-directive counseling, decision-making, and patient care in GC is important for the reflection and development of the profession to understand how to assist and support patients facing sensitive and difficult decisions, in a meaningful, and contextually-tailored manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Scott
- The Health Communication Research Unit (HCRU), School of Human & Community Development, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Jennifer Watermeyer
- The Health Communication Research Unit (HCRU), School of Human & Community Development, Faculty of Humanities, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Tina-Marie Wessels
- Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pathology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Clemens S, Iglseder B, Alzner R, Kogler M, Rose O, Kutschar P, Krutter S, Kanduth K, Dückelmann C, Flamm M, Pachmayr J. Effects of medication management in geriatric patients who have fallen: results of the EMMA mixed-methods study. Age Ageing 2024; 53:afae070. [PMID: 38619121 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afae070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND comprehensive medication management (CMM) can reduce medication-related risks of falling. However, knowledge about inter-individual treatment effects and patient-related barriers remains scarce. OBJECTIVE to gain in-depth insights into how geriatric patients who have fallen view their medication-related risks of falling and to identify effects and barriers of a CMM in preventing falls. DESIGN complementary mixed-methods pre-post study, based on an embedded quasi-experimental model. SETTING geriatric fracture centre. METHODS qualitative, semi-structured interviews framed the CMM intervention, including a follow-up period of 12 weeks. Interviews explored themes of falling, medication-related risks, post-discharge acceptability and sustainability of interventions using qualitative content analysis. Optimisation of pharmacotherapy was assessed via changes in the weighted and summated Medication Appropriateness Index (MAI) score, number of fall-risk-increasing drugs (FRID) and potentially inappropriate medications (PIM) according to the Fit fOR The Aged and PRISCUS lists using parametric testing. RESULTS thirty community-dwelling patients aged ≥65 years, taking ≥5 drugs and admitted after an injurious fall were recruited. The MAI was significantly reduced, but number of FRID and PIM remained largely unchanged. Many patients were open to medication reduction/discontinuation, but expressed fear when it came to their personal medication. Psychosocial issues and pain increased the number of indications. Safe alternatives for FRID were frequently not available. Psychosocial burden of living alone, fear, lack of supportive care and insomnia increased after discharge. CONCLUSION as patients' individual attitudes towards trauma and medication were not predictable, an individual and longitudinal CMM is required. A standardised approach is not helpful in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Clemens
- Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology and Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Center of Public Health and Health Services Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Bernhard Iglseder
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, A-5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Reinhard Alzner
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Christian Doppler Klinik, Paracelsus Medical University, Ignaz-Harrer-Straße 79, A-5020, Salzburg, Austria
| | | | - Olaf Rose
- Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology and Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Patrick Kutschar
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Simon Krutter
- Institute of Nursing Science and Practice, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Karin Kanduth
- Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology and Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Christina Dückelmann
- Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology and Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Landesapotheke Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Maria Flamm
- Institute of General Practice, Family Medicine and Preventive Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johanna Pachmayr
- Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Biology and Clinical Pharmacy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Center of Public Health and Health Services Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lyu Y, Xu Q, Liu J. Exploring the medical decision-making patterns and influencing factors among the general Chinese public: a binary logistic regression analysis. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:887. [PMID: 38523310 PMCID: PMC10962172 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18338-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With the ongoing evolution of the healthcare system and shifts in cultural paradigms, there is a pressing need to delve into the medical decision-making behaviors of general Chinese public and understand their underlying motivations. This research seeks to elucidate the prevailing tendencies in these decision-making processes and to empirically validate the pivotal factors that shape their choices, offering valuable insights for healthcare policymakers and institutions. METHOD A comprehensive survey was administered to 2,696 Chinese residents to examine their medical decision-making patterns. These patterns were classified into two primary categories: Unilateral Decision-making (Doctor-dominant, Family-centric, and Patient-driven subtypes) and Collaborative Decision-making (Doctor-led, Doctor-Patient, Patient-Family, and Doctor-Patient-Family subtypes). Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to empirically pinpoint the significant factors influencing these decision-making frameworks. RESULTS The study's analysis reveals distinct preferences in medical decision-making among Chinese residents. In the Collaborative Decision-making category, chosen by 70.81% of participants, the subtypes are as follows: Doctor-led (29.90%), Doctor-Patient (13.54%), Patient-Family (2.93%), and Doctor-Patient-Family (24.44%). The Unilateral Decision-making, preferred by 29.19%, includes Doctor-dominant (23.22%), Family-centric (1.74%), and Patient-driven (4.23%) models. The preference for Collaborative Decision-making is associated with higher educational levels, specific marital statuses (particularly married but childless), and choices of rural residents' basic medical insurance or occupational basic medical insurance. In contrast, Unilateral Decision-making correlates with males, individuals with religious beliefs, certain occupational roles (like civil servants), and holders of commercial or publicly funded medical insurance. CONCLUSION This study elucidates the complex interplay of socio-cultural and individual determinants shaping medical decision-making in China. The findings reveal a marked inclination towards collaborative models, closely linked to educational level, marital status, and specific insurance types, reflecting an evolving trend towards participatory healthcare. Simultaneously, the persistence of unilateral models, influenced by gender, religious beliefs, and occupational roles, highlights the heterogeneity within Chinese healthcare preferences. These insights are crucial for policymakers and healthcare practitioners, underscoring the need for adaptable, culturally attuned healthcare frameworks that cater to this diversity, thereby enhancing patient engagement and healthcare efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuwen Lyu
- Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China
| | - Qian Xu
- School of Health Management, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China
| | - Junrong Liu
- Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 511436, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hughes G, Stephens TJ, Seuren LM, Pearse RM, Shaw SE. Clinical context and communication in shared decision-making about major surgery: Findings from a qualitative study with colorectal, orthopaedic and cardiac patients. Health (London) 2024:13634593241238857. [PMID: 38514999 DOI: 10.1177/13634593241238857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
Increasing numbers of older people undergo major surgery in the United Kingdom (UK), with many at high risk of complications due to age, co-morbidities or frailty. This article reports on a study of such patients and their clinicians engaged in shared decision-making. Shared decision-making is a collaborative approach that seeks to value and centre patients' preferences, potentially addressing asymmetries of knowledge and power between clinicians and patients by countering medical authority with greater patient empowerment. We studied shared decision-making practices in the context of major surgery by recruiting 16 patients contemplating either colorectal, cardiac or joint replacement surgery in the UK National Health Service (NHS). Over 18 months 2019-2020, we observed and video-recorded decision-making consultations, studied the organisational and clinical context for consultations, and interviewed patients and clinicians about their experiences of making decisions. Linguistic ethnography, the study of communication and interaction in context, guided us to analyse the interplay between interactions (during consultations between clinicians, patients and family members) and clinical and organisational features of the contexts for those interactions. We found that the framing of consultations as being about life-saving or life-enhancing procedures was important in producing three different genres of consultations focused variously on: resolving problems, deliberation of options and evaluation of benefits of surgery. We conclude that medical authority persists, but can be used to create more deliberative opportunities for decision-making through amending the context for consultations in addition to adopting appropriate communication practices during surgical consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Hughes
- University of Leicester, UK
- University of Oxford, UK
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Engelsma C. Sharing a medical decision. Med Health Care Philos 2024; 27:3-14. [PMID: 38010578 PMCID: PMC10904442 DOI: 10.1007/s11019-023-10179-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
During the last decades, shared decision making (SDM) has become a very popular model for the physician-patient relationship. SDM can refer to a process (making a decision in a shared way) and a product (making a shared decision). In the literature, by far most attention is devoted to the process. In this paper, I investigate the product, wondering what is involved by a medical decision being shared. I argue that the degree to which a decision to implement a medical alternative is shared should be determined by taking into account six considerations: (i) how the physician and the patient rank that alternative, (ii) the individual preference scores the physician and the patient (would) assign to that alternative, (iii) the similarity of the preference scores, (iv) the similarity of the rankings, (v) the total concession size, and (vi) the similarity of the concession sizes. I explain why shared medical decisions are valuable, and sketch implications of the analysis for the physician-patient relationship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Coos Engelsma
- Department of Ethics, Centre for Dentistry and Oral Hygiene, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yin R, Neyens DM. Examining how information presentation methods and a chatbot impact the use and effectiveness of electronic health record patient portals: An exploratory study. Patient Educ Couns 2024; 119:108055. [PMID: 37976665 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examining information presentation strategies that may facilitate patient education through patient portals is important for effective health education. METHODS A randomized exploratory study evaluated information presentation (text or videos) and a chatbot in patient education and examined several performance and outcome variables (e.g., search duration, Decisional Conflict Scale, and eye-tracking measures), along with a simple descriptive qualitative content analysis of the transcript of chatbot. RESULTS Of the 92 participants, those within the text conditions (n = 46, p < 0.001), had chatbot experiences (B =-74.85, p = 0.046), knew someone with IBD (B =-98.66, p = 0.039), and preferred to engage in medical decision-making (B =102.32, p = 0.006) were more efficient in information-searching. Participants with videos spent longer in information-searching (mean=666.5 (SD=171.6) VS 480.3 (SD=159.5) seconds, p < 0.001) but felt more informed (mean score=18.8 (SD=17.6) VS 27.4 (SD=18.9), p = 0.027). The participants' average eye fixation duration with videos was significantly higher (mean= 473.8 ms, SD=52.9, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Participants in video conditions were less efficient but more effective in information seeking. Exploring the trade-offs between efficiency and effectiveness for user interface designs is important to appropriately deliver education within patient portals. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This study suggests that user interface designs and chatbots impact health information's efficiency and effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Yin
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Pittsburg Institute, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
| | - David M Neyens
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Department of Bioengineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gupta M, Madhavan S, Teo FSY, Low JK, Shelat VG. Perceptions of Singaporeans towards informed consent: a cross-sectional survey. Singapore Med J 2024; 65:91-98. [PMID: 34717299 PMCID: PMC10942135 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2021163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In a patient-centric health system, it is essential to know patients' views about informed consent. The objective of this study was to understand the perceptions of the local population regarding informed consent. METHODS Spanning 6 weeks from January 2016 to March 2016, a cross-sectional survey of adults attending the General Surgery outpatient clinics at Tan Tock Seng Hospital was conducted. Sociodemographic data, lifestyle- and health-related information, perception and purpose of consent forms, and decision-making preferences were studied. RESULTS A total of 445 adults participated in the survey. Most participants were aged below 40 years ( n = 265, 60.1%), female ( n = 309, 70.1%) and degree holders ( n = 196, 44.4%). Also, 56.9% of participants wanted to know every possible risk, while 28.3% wanted to know the common and serious risks. On multivariate analysis, age (61-74 years: odds ratio [OR] 11.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.2-56.1, P = 0.004; age >75 years: OR 22.2, 95% CI 1.8-279.1, P = 0.017) was a predictor of not wanting to know any risks. Age also predicted risk of disclosure for death (age 61-74 years: OR 13.4, 95% CI 4.2-42.6, P < 0.001; age >75 years: OR 32.0, 95% CI 4.5-228.0, P = 0.001). Most participants (48.1%) preferred making shared decisions with doctors, and an important predictor was employment status (OR 4.8, 95% CI 1.9-12.2, P = 0.001). CONCLUSION Sociodemographic factors and educational level influence decision-making, and therefore, the informed consent process should be tailored for each patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehek Gupta
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Sudharsan Madhavan
- Ministry of Health Holdings, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | | | - Jee Keem Low
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| | - Vishal G. Shelat
- Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Resnicow K, Delacroix E, Sonneville KR, Considine S, Grundmeier RW, Shu D, Faerber JA, Fiks AG, Steffes J, Harris D, Woo H, Proctor T, Wright ME, Shone LP, Barlow SE, Wasserman RC, Siegel R, Stockwell MS. Outcome of BMI2+: Motivational Interviewing to Reduce BMI Through Primary Care AAP PROS Practices. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023062462. [PMID: 38282541 PMCID: PMC10827646 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-062462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pediatric obesity rates in the United States remain at an all-time high. Pediatric primary care clinicians and registered dietitians can help treat childhood obesity, and motivational interviewing (MI) has shown promising effects in prior trials. METHODS We randomized 18 pediatric primary care practices to receive the Brief Motivational Interviewing to Reduce BMI or BMI2+ intervention or continue with usual care (UC). Practices were recruited through the American Academy of Pediatrics Pediatric Research in Office Settings network. The intervention comprised 4 components1: in-person and telehealth MI counseling by pediatric clinicians; 4 recommended sessions,2 6 telephone MI counseling sessions from a registered dietitian,3 text message reminders and tailored motivational messages, and4 parent educational materials. The main outcome was the change in the percentage of the 95th percentile of BMI. The study was conducted 2017 through 2021. RESULTS There was a significant treatment x time interaction (b = 0.017, 95% confidence interval: [0.0066-0.027]) for the main outcome, favoring the UC group, with youth in the intervention arm showing a greater relative increase in their percent of the 95th percentile. CONCLUSIONS There was no overall benefit of the intervention and, contrary to expectations, youth in the intervention arm gained more weight, based on percent of the distance from the 95th percentile than matched youth from UC practices. The absolute excess weight gain among intervention relative to UC youth was small, approximately 0.5 BMI units and 1 kg over 2 years. We offer several potential explanations for these unexpected findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ken Resnicow
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Emerson Delacroix
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Shannon Considine
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Di Shu
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Alexander G. Fiks
- Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jennifer Steffes
- Primary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, Illinois
| | - Donna Harris
- Primary Care Research, American Academy of Pediatrics, Itasca, Illinois
| | - Heide Woo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tim Proctor
- Physician’s Computer Company, Winooski, Vermont
| | | | | | - Sarah E. Barlow
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Robert Siegel
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Melissa S. Stockwell
- Division of Child Adolescent Health, Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons and Department of Population and Family Health, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
MacDonald BJ, Turgeon RD. Some disproven misconceptions about shared decision-making. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2024; 157:10-12. [PMID: 38125631 PMCID: PMC10729717 DOI: 10.1177/17151635231213293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Blair J. MacDonald
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - Ricky D. Turgeon
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Shih HJ, Xue H, Min H, Wojtusiak J, Chang J. Informing Patient-Provider Engagement for Shared Decision Making Through Mobile Health Applications. Patient Prefer Adherence 2023; 17:3489-3501. [PMID: 38146503 PMCID: PMC10749551 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s438710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The study utilized a cross-sectional dataset to identify demographic and health factors associated with patient utilization of mHealth applications for engaging with healthcare providers. The focus was on adults with chronic health conditions as the primary app user group. The goal was to reveal specific barriers and facilitators to app adoption among smartphone users, with the aim of highlighting opportunities for upgrades that promote patient empowerment as a prerequisite for shared decision-making (SDM). Methods Data from the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS 5, Cycle 4, 2020) with 3865 respondents (≥18 years old) stratified analyses and weighted logistic regression were used. Results The study found that individuals having a wellness app on a smartphone increased the likelihood (OR 2.68, CI: 2.02-3.56, p-value < 0.0001) of discussing health conditions with providers. Furthermore, individuals with multiple chronic health conditions were more likely (OR 1.93, CI 1.26-2.95, p-value < 0.01) to use apps to use mobile health applications to engage with healthcare providers. Other significant variables affecting app usage such as race, marital status, and educational level. Conclusion Due to difficulties obtaining in-person healthcare, the COVID-19 epidemic forced a swift deployment of mHealth technologies. Even in the absence of a crisis, mobile health applications continue to be crucial for improving patient-provider engagement and developing novel approaches to healthcare delivery. During the pandemic, people with numerous chronic diseases used apps to stay in touch with doctors and maintain their reliance on these platforms. Nonetheless, different smartphone users continue to use mHealth application in different ways. The findings revealing barriers in mHealth app adoption among certain patient subgroups suggest opportunities for developers, in collaboration with users and providers, to enhance inclusion and acceptability when upgrading mHealth application platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huan-Ju Shih
- Department of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax City, VA, USA
| | - Hong Xue
- Department of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax City, VA, USA
| | - Hua Min
- Department of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax City, VA, USA
| | - Janusz Wojtusiak
- Department of Health and Human Services, George Mason University, Fairfax City, VA, USA
| | - Jongwha Chang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Irma Lerma Rangel School of Pharmacy, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Shaik T, Aggarwal K, Singh B, Sawhney A, Naguluri R, Jain R, Jain R. A comprehensive analysis of different types of clinical rounds in hospital medicine. Proc AMIA Symp 2023; 37:135-141. [PMID: 38173995 PMCID: PMC10761014 DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2023.2261086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Table rounds and bedside rounds are two methods healthcare professionals employ during clinical rounds for patient care and medical education. Bedside rounds involve direct patient engagement and physical examination, thus significantly impacting patient outcomes, such as improving communication and patient satisfaction. Table rounds occur in a conference room without the patient present and involve discussing patient data, which is more effective in fostering structured medical education. Both bedside and table rounds have pros and cons, and healthcare professionals should consider the specific requirements of their patients and medical trainees when deciding which approach to use. This research utilized a comprehensive search to identify relevant resources, such as university website links, as well as a PubMed search using relevant keywords such as 'bedside rounding,' 'table rounding,' and 'patient satisfaction.' Relevance, publication date, and study design were the basis for inclusion criteria. This study compared the effectiveness of these two methods based on physician communication, medical education, patient care, and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanveer Shaik
- Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao
| | | | | | - Aanchal Sawhney
- Department of Internal Medicine, Crozer Chester Medical Center, Upland, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Riya Naguluri
- Great Valley High School, Malvern, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rohit Jain
- Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao
| | - Rahul Jain
- Avalon University School of Medicine, Willemstad, Curacao
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Damiaens A, Van Hecke A, Foulon V. The RESPECT-brochure: Development of a tool to inform and empower residents and informal caregivers on the medicines' pathway in nursing homes. PEC Innov 2023; 3:100195. [PMID: 37583597 PMCID: PMC10423891 DOI: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023]
Abstract
Objective To develop and evaluate a tool to inform and empower nursing home (NH) residents and informal caregivers regarding the medicines' pathway. Methods Feedback on the tool's text, drafted by the research team, was collected from a professional organization; the lay-out was designed by an illustrator. The tool was pilot tested in NHs, focusing on feasibility, appropriateness, and meaningfulness. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with residents, informal caregivers, and healthcare professionals were performed, as well as document analysis. Qualitative data were analyzed inductively. Results The RESPECT-brochure was developed and described each process of the medicines' pathway. Piloting showed that the tool was well perceived among residents and informal caregivers and offered opportunities to discuss medication-related questions and concerns, but that skills to tailor the conversation, especially given the changing NH population, a matching vision and local champion are required for the tool's uptake. Conclusion An informative and empowering tool has been successfully developed and pilot tested in NHs. Future research should investigate which strategies for implementation work best and can explore the impact of the tool's use in daily practice. Innovation The tool is the first in its kind and grants nursing home staff a new strategy to promote person-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Damiaens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, UGent, Department of Nursing director, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alkhaibari RA, Smith-Merry J, Forsyth R. "I am not just a place for implementation. I should be a partner": a qualitative study of patient-centered care from the perspective of diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:1412. [PMID: 38098092 PMCID: PMC10722796 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10391-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient involvement in care is a major component of high quality of care and is becoming recognized worldwide with many beneficial for improving patient outcomes. However, a little is known about patient involvement in the Middle East region and Saudi Arabia in particular. OBJECTIVES To evaluate patients' perceptions of their involvement during their interactions with healthcare providers in Saudi Arabia. METHODS A qualitative exploratory study using semi structured interview was conducted from February 2022 to March 2022. Responses were transcribed and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS We conducted seven interviews with patients with diabetes ranging in age from 19 to 69 years old. We identified the following themes:1) patients' perceptions of their involvement in care, 2) barriers to patient involvement, 3) effective communication, 4) empathy, and 5) culture. We found that patients had minimal knowledge of patient involvement in care. CONCLUSION There is a clear need to improve education and awareness of patient involvement in Saudi Arabia. By educating patients about the possibilities of patient involvement and explaining their role it will make it easier for patients to understand appropriate levels of involvement. In addition, there is a need to understand the patient-centred care culture in Saudi Arabia through establishing frameworks with the focus on culture and patient-centred healthcare delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reeham Ahmed Alkhaibari
- Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- College of Nursing, Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Jennifer Smith-Merry
- Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Sydney School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rowena Forsyth
- Cyberpsychology Research Group, Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health Theme, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rubens ME, Mayo TP, Smith RK, Glasgow SC, Politi MC. A Qualitative Exploration of Stakeholders' Preferences for Early-Stage Rectal Cancer Treatment. Ann Surg Open 2023; 4:e364. [PMID: 38144488 PMCID: PMC10735060 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023] Open
Abstract
As treatment options for patients with rectal cancer evolve, patients with early-stage rectal cancer may have a treatment choice between surgery and a trial of nonoperative management. Patients must consider the treatments' clinical tradeoffs alongside their personal goals and preferences. Shared decision-making (SDM) between patients and clinicians can improve decision quality when patients are faced with preference-sensitive care options. We interviewed 28 stakeholders (13 clinicians and 15 patients) to understand their perspectives on early-stage rectal cancer treatment decision-making. Clinicians included surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists who treat rectal cancer. Adult patients included those diagnosed with early-stage rectal cancer in the past 5 years, recruited from an institutional database. A semi-structured interview guide was developed based on a well-established decision support framework and reviewed by the research team and stakeholders. Interviews were conducted between January 2022 and January 2023. Transcripts were coded by 2 raters and analyzed using thematic analysis. Both clinicians and patients recognized the importance of SDM to support high-quality decisions about the treatment of early-stage rectal cancer. Barriers to SDM included variable clinician motivation due to lack of training or perception of patients' desires or abilities to engage, as well as time-constrained encounters. A decision aid could help facilitate SDM for early-stage rectal cancer by providing standardized, evidence-based information about treatment options that align with clinicians' and patients' decision needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Mary C. Politi
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wells D, Moustafa Y, Vasquez AR. End-of-Life Care Considerations for the Hispanic Patient in the United States #469. J Palliat Med 2023; 26:1744-1745. [PMID: 38060319 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
|
17
|
Chen SY, Radomski SN, Stem M, Papanikolaou A, Gabre-Kidan A, Gearhart SL, Efron JE, Atallah C. Factors associated with not undergoing surgery for locally advanced rectal cancers: An NCDB propensity-matched analysis. Surgery 2023; 174:1323-1333. [PMID: 37852832 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The traditional treatment paradigm for patients with locally advanced rectal cancers has been neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by curative intent surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to assess surgery trends for locally advanced rectal cancers, factors associated with forgoing surgery, and overall survival outcomes. METHODS Adults with locally advanced rectal cancers were retrospectively analyzed using the National Cancer Database (2004-2019). Propensity score matching was performed. Factors associated with not undergoing surgery were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for 5-year overall survival analysis, stratified by stage and treatment type. RESULTS A total of 72,653 patients were identified, with 64,396 (88.64%) patients undergoing neoadjuvant + surgery ± adjuvant therapy, 579 (0.80%) chemotherapy only, 916 (1.26%) radiation only, and 6,762 (9.31%) chemoradiation only. The proportion of patients who underwent surgery declined over the study period (95.61% in 2006 to 92.29% in 2019, P trend < .001), whereas the proportion of patients who refused surgery increased (1.45%-4.48%, P trend < .001). Factors associated with not undergoing surgery for locally advanced rectal cancers included older age, Black race (odds ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.35-1.60, P < .001), higher Charlson-Deyo score (score ≥3: 1.79, 1.58-2.04, P < .001), stage II cancer (1.22, 1.17-1.28, P < .001), lower median household income, and non-private insurance. Neoadjuvant + surgery ± adjuvant therapy was associated with the best 5-year overall survival, regardless of stage, in unmatched and matched cohorts. CONCLUSION Despite surgery remaining an integral component in the management of locally advanced rectal cancers, there is a concerning decline in guideline-concordant surgical care for rectal cancer in the United States, with evidence of persistent socioeconomic disparities. Providers should seek to understand patient perspectives/barriers and guide them toward surgery if appropriate candidates. Continued standardization, implementation, and evaluation of rectal cancer care through national accreditation programs are necessary to ensure that all patients receive optimal treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Y Chen
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Shannon N Radomski
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Miloslawa Stem
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Angelos Papanikolaou
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYC, NY
| | - Alodia Gabre-Kidan
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Susan L Gearhart
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Jonathan E Efron
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Chady Atallah
- Colorectal Research Unit, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD; Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health, NYC, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Murray A, Francks L, Hassanein ZM, Lee R, Wilson E. Breast cancer surgical decision-making. Experiences of Non-Caucasian women globally. A qualitative systematic review. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:107109. [PMID: 37866153 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a qualitative systematic review exploring the influencing factors within the surgical decision-making (SDM) processes following a breast cancer diagnosis in non-caucasian women globally. STUDY DESIGN Qualitative systemic review following PRISMA guidelines. METHODS A comprehensive search strategy was applied to four databases. 5243 papers were screened using a composed inclusion and exclusion criteria resulting in 10 total papers to be included. These papers underwent JBI quality assessment and ConQual assessment to ensure strength in validation, reliability, and quality. RESULTS Six main overarching themes relating to SDM were determined: fear, information, patient-doctor relationship, wellbeing, external influences, and culture. All ethnicities experienced fear in one way. Misinformation was widely experienced in concordance with either a lack of education (Iranian and Ghanian women) or language barriers (immigrant populations). Trust was overarching in all patient-doctor relationships, some being overshadowed by an authoritative dynamic in Ghanian and Iranian women. Well-being, both psychological and body image was noted in all but the Ghanian and Iranian women. Every ethnicity experienced external influences involving either others, time or cost. Lastly, cultural expectations and beliefs of the doctor was present in all native or immigrant Asian communities. CONCLUSIONS The study identified several factors which were common between ethnicities, notably multifactorial fear, well-being factors, opinions and trust of others, and timing. Conversely, information availability and the nature of patient-doctor relationships varied widely between ethnicities. The study has identified some realistic and achievable focus areas for practice improvement, but also notes the challenges of changing long-established cultural norms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annabel Murray
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | - Lucy Francks
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Zeinab M Hassanein
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Rachel Lee
- Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Wilson
- Nottingham Centre for Public Health and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; Nottingham Centre for Evidence-Based Healthcare, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom; Nottingham Breast Institute, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schneider AR, Ravani P, King-Shier KM, Quinn RR, MacRae JM, Love S, Oliver MJ, Hiremath S, James MT, Ortiz M, Manns BR, Elliott MJ. Alignment Among Patient, Caregiver, and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Hemodialysis Vascular Access Decision-Making: A Qualitative Study. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2023; 10:20543581231215858. [PMID: 38033483 PMCID: PMC10685780 DOI: 10.1177/20543581231215858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Updates to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access emphasize the "right access, in the right patient, at the right time, for the right reasons." Although this implies a collaborative approach, little is known about how patients, their caregivers, and health care providers engage in vascular access (VA) decision-making. Objective To explore how the perspectives of patients receiving hemodialysis, their caregivers, and hemodialysis care team align and diverge in relation to VA selection. Design Qualitative descriptive study. Setting Five outpatient hemodialysis centers in Calgary, Alberta. Participants Our purposive sample included 19 patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis, 2 caregivers, and 21 health care providers (7 hemodialysis nurses, 6 VA nurses, and 8 nephrologists). Methods We conducted semi-structured interviews with consenting participants. Using an inductive thematic analysis approach, we coded transcripts in duplicate and characterized themes addressing our research objective. Results While participants across roles shared some perspectives related to VA decision-making, we identified areas where views diverged. Areas of alignment included (1) optimizing patient preparedness-acknowledging decisional readiness and timing, and (2) value placed on trusting relationships with the kidney care team-respecting decisional autonomy with guidance. Perspectives diverged in the following aspects: (1) differing VA priorities and preferences-patients' emphasis on minimizing disruptions to normalcy contrasted with providers' preferences for fistulas and optimizing biomedical parameters of dialysis; (2) influence of personal and peer experience-patients preferred pragmatic, experiential knowledge, whereas providers emphasized informational credibility; and (3) endpoints for VA review-reassessment of VA decisions was prompted by access dissatisfaction for patients and a medical imperative to achieve a functioning access for health care providers. Limitations Participation was limited to individuals comfortable communicating in English and from urban, in-center hemodialysis units. Few informal caregivers of people receiving hemodialysis and younger patients participated in this study. Conclusions Although patients, caregivers, and healthcare providers share perspectives on important aspects of VA decisions, conflicting priorities and preferences may impact the decisional outcome. Findings highlight opportunities to bridge knowledge and readiness gaps and integrate shared decision-making in the VA selection process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pietro Ravani
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kathryn M. King-Shier
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Robert R. Quinn
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Jennifer M. MacRae
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Shannan Love
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | | | - Swapnil Hiremath
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Matthew T. James
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Mia Ortiz
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Braden R. Manns
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Meghan J. Elliott
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ey JD, Herath MB, Reid JL, Bradshaw EL, Ting YY, Treloar EC, Maddern GJ. Improving communication and patient information recall via a question prompt list: randomized clinical trial. Br J Surg 2023; 110:1793-1799. [PMID: 37768034 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-surgeon communication is an important component of the success of a consultation and is known to impact patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a document called a question prompt list, containing suggested questions that a patient may like to ask their doctor, improved communication. METHODS A prospective RCT was conducted from October 2021 to October 2022 at The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia. Patients 16 years or older, seeing a general surgeon for a pre-surgical consultation, not requiring a translator, were randomized to receive a question prompt list (intervention) or standard care without a question prompt list (control). The primary outcomes were number of questions asked, talk time, and mutual eye gaze. Secondary outcomes were patient recall of information, anxiety, and consultation duration. Randomization was achieved using a computer program, with allocation concealment by opaque sequentially numbered envelopes. Patients were blinded to study group; surgeons were aware of study group, but blinded to outcomes. RESULTS Patients (59) were randomly allocated to receive the question prompt list (31) or to the control group (28). A patient from the intervention group withdrew before consultation, resulting in 58 patients being included in the analysis. In the question prompt list consultations, 24 per cent more questions were asked (incidence rate ratio = 1.25, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.42; P = 0.001). The intervention group recalled 9 per cent more items than the control group (incidence rate ratio = 1.09, 95 per cent c.i. 1.02 to 1.17; P = 0.012). The control group were 26 per cent less likely to correctly recall information about surgical treatment (OR = 0.26, 95 per cent c.i. 0.10 to 0.68; P = 0.006). No statistically significant differences between study arms for talk time, mutual eye gaze, anxiety, or consultation duration were demonstrated. CONCLUSION The question prompt list was associated with increased question asking and greater patient recall of medical information. It did not increase patient anxiety or consultation duration. REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12623000089639 (http://www.ANZCTR.org.au).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesse D Ey
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matheesha B Herath
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jessica L Reid
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Emma L Bradshaw
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ying Yang Ting
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Ellie C Treloar
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Guy J Maddern
- Department of Surgery, The University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Blum L, Jarach CM, Ellen ME. Perceptions of shared decision making in gastroenterology and inflammatory bowel disease: A qualitative analysis. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 115:107877. [PMID: 37437510 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2023] [Revised: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Shared decision-making (SDM) is the partnership and discussion between clinicians and patients to make an appropriate decision based on scientific evidence and patient preferences. Many benefits are associated with SDM; however, little is known about its awareness or use by inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinicians in gastroenterology departments across Israel. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators in implementing SDM as standard practice to achieve optimal disease management and personalized care for patients with IBD. METHODS Sixteen semi-structured interviews were conducted with IBD clinicians across Israel to identify the barriers and facilitators for SDM use. An interview guide was developed, based on the systematic approach of the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF). Interview transcripts were coded into theoretical domains to identify factors that may impact SDM. RESULTS Sixteen gastroenterologists from nine different hospitals were interviewed. Common TDF domains that presented as barriers were: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, environmental context and resources, and reinforcement. Most participants had never heard the precise term "shared decision making" and lacked formal training on SDM. CONCLUSION This study identified key barriers and facilitators to SDM in IBD clinics across Israel. Main barriers of SDM include limited or nonexistent training; clinicians were unaware of SDM guidelines or techniques. The main facilitators of SDM were clinicians' social and professional role and identity and their beliefs about the influence of IBD and/or CD. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS These influencing factors and TDF domains identified provide a basis for developing future interventions to improve the implementation of SDM within IBD management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Livnat Blum
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
| | - Carlotta Micaela Jarach
- Laboratory of Lifestyle Research, Department of Medical Epidemiology, Mario Negri Institute of Pharmacological Research, IRCCS, Italy.
| | - Moriah E Ellen
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Guilford Glazer Faculty of Business and Management and Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel; Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada; Israel Implementation Science and Policy Engagement Centre, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Eghrari-Sabet J, Williams D, Bukstein DA, Winders T, Gardner DD. Real-world use and perceptions of shared decision-making for allergy and asthma care in a US population. World Allergy Organ J 2023; 16:100828. [PMID: 37859758 PMCID: PMC10582489 DOI: 10.1016/j.waojou.2023.100828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Shared decision-making (SDM), the process of engaging patients in their healthcare decisions, is an integral component of personalized medicine. The use of SDM in real-world allergy and asthma care in the United States (US) is unknown. Cross-sectional surveys of allergists and patients in a US population were conducted to assess the use and perceptions of SDM and SDM tools in real-world allergy and asthma care. Methods Allergists (N = 101) who were members of the American College of Allergy Asthma & Immunology (ACAAI) and who were also Dynata (a marketing research firm) research partners or in the Allergy & Asthma Network customer database completed an online survey from February-March 2022. Adult patients (N = 110) with asthma, allergy, and/or eczema in the United States who were participants of online research panels hosted by Dynata completed on online survey from February 1-7, 2022. Results Based on their own definition, 98% of the allergists reported familiarity with SDM, and 79% reported using it frequently. Allergists reported using SDM with an average of 44% of their patients. The most commonly used tool was the Immunotherapy SDM toolkit (40%); 43% had not used any SDM tool. Among allergists not using SDM or using it infrequently (n = 19), 42% considered it too time-consuming and 37% believed their patients have low health literacy. Of the surveyed patients, 25% reported their provider used SDM "frequently" or "occasionally" when being treated for allergies, asthma, or eczema, and 22% reported using SDM tools with their provider at some point. The most commonly used tool was the Asthma and Allergy Symptom Test (60%). Among patients whose allergists used SDM infrequently or never (n = 56), 70% reported they would be likely to ask their allergist to use SDM more often. Conclusion Survey responses revealed a disconnect between allergists and patients regarding SDM use. Barriers to SDM are consistent with those across the healthcare industry. Patients clearly expressed their desire for SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dennis Williams
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Olchowska-Kotala A, Strządała A, Barański J. Patients' Values and Desire for Autonomy: An Empirical Study from Poland. J Bioeth Inq 2023; 20:409-419. [PMID: 36961586 PMCID: PMC10624733 DOI: 10.1007/s11673-023-10241-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
There is a growing body of literature concerning factors that can influence patients' perception, preferences, or expectations with regard to autonomy in making healthcare decisions. Although many factors responsible for the desire for autonomy in medical decision-making are already recognized, little is known about how the desire for autonomy is related to values, which refer to important goals of human actions. The present study was designed to determine the relationship between the desire for autonomy and basic personal values drawn on Schwartz's value theory. We conducted survey in two age groups: younger and older adults. In the group of younger adults, the desire for autonomy was associated with the need to be appreciated as a person, motivation to act independently, and the abandonment of traditional order and values, whereas in the group of older adults, with independent thinking and a lack of humility. Our study highlighted that the desire for autonomy may result from slightly different reasons in people of particular age groups. These findings might be helpful for medical professionals in developing accurate communication patterns with different age groups of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnieszka Olchowska-Kotala
- Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, ul Mikulicza-Radeckiego 7, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Agata Strządała
- Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, ul Mikulicza-Radeckiego 7, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland.
| | - Jarosław Barański
- Department of Medical Humanities and Social Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, ul Mikulicza-Radeckiego 7, 50-368, Wroclaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lazaridis C. Informed Consent and Decision-Making for Patients with Acquired Cognitive Impairment. Neurol Clin 2023; 41:433-442. [PMID: 37407097 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2023.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
Informed consent (IC) is an ethical and legal requirement grounded in the principle of autonomy. Cognitive impairment may often interfere with decision-making capacity necessitating alternative models of ethically sound deliberation. In cases where the patient lacks decision-making capacity, one must determine the appropriate decision-maker and the criteria used in making a medical decision appropriate for the patient. In this article, I critically discuss the traditional approaches of IC, advance directives, substituted judgment, and best interests. A further suggestion is that thinking about sufficient reasons for or against a course of action is a conceptual enrichment in addition to the concepts of interests and well-being. Finally, I propose another model of collective consensus-seeking decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christos Lazaridis
- Department of Neurology, University of Chicago, IL, USA; Department of Neurosurgery, University of Chicago, IL, USA; MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, University of Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Büdenbender B, Köther AK, Kriegmair MC, Grüne B, Michel MS, Alpers GW. Getting specific: participation preference in urooncological decision-making. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023; 23:114. [PMID: 37407999 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-023-02201-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making is the gold standard for good clinical practice, and thus, psychometric instruments have been established to assess patients' generic preference for participation (e.g., the Autonomy Preference Index, API). However, patients' preferences may vary depending on the specific disease and with respect to the specific decision context. With a modified preference index (API-Uro), we assessed patients' specific participation preference in preference-sensitive decisions pertaining to urological cancer treatments and compared this with their generic participation preference. METHODS In Study 1, we recruited (N = 469) urological outpatients (43.1% urooncological) at a large university hospital. Participation preference was assessed with generic measures (API and API case vignettes) and with the disease-specific API-Uro (urooncological case vignettes describing medical decisions of variable difficulty). A polychoric exploratory factor analysis was used to establish factorial validity and reduce items. In Study 2, we collected data from N = 204 bladder cancer patients in a multicenter study to validate the factorial structure with confirmatory factor analysis. Differences between the participation preference for different decision contexts were analyzed. RESULTS Study 1: Scores on the specific urooncological case vignettes (API-Uro) correlated with the generic measure (r = .44) but also provided incremental information. Among the disease-specific vignettes of the API-Uro, there were two factors with good internal consistency (α ≥ .8): treatment versus diagnostic decisions. Patients desired more participation for treatment decisions (77.8%) than for diagnostic decisions (22%), χ2(1) = 245.1, p ≤ .001. Study 2: Replicated the correlation of the API-Uro with the API (r = .39) and its factorial structure (SRMR = .08; CFI = .974). Bladder cancer patients also desired more participation for treatment decisions (57.4%) than for diagnostic decisions (13.3%), χ²(1) =84, p ≤ .001. CONCLUSIONS The desire to participate varies between treatment versus diagnostic decisions among urological patients. This underscores the importance of assessing participation preference for specific contexts. Overall, the new API-Uro has good psychometric properties and is well suited to assess patients' preferences. In routine care, measures of participation preference for specific decision contexts may provide incremental, allowing clinicians to better address their patients' individual needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Büdenbender
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, L 15-17, 68131, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anja K Köther
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, L 15-17, 68131, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Britta Grüne
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maurice S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg W Alpers
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, L 15-17, 68131, Mannheim, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Panahi S, Spearman B, Sundrud J, Lunceford M, Kamimura A. The Impact of Patient Autonomy Among Uninsured Free Clinic Patients. J Patient Exp 2023; 10:23743735231179041. [PMID: 37323759 PMCID: PMC10265317 DOI: 10.1177/23743735231179041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Uninsured primary care patients tend to experience barriers to autonomy in clinical decision-making due to limited choices of healthcare facilities and low health literacy. This study examined whether certain factors, including the component of patient-centeredness, are associated with patient autonomy among these populations and contribute to reducing disparities in healthcare. This was a cross-sectional study using a convenience sample of free clinic patients aged 18 years and older who spoke English and/or Spanish. Multiple regression analyses were performed to understand factors associated with Ideal Patient's Autonomy. Data were collected from September to December 2019. Findings conclude that Spanish-speaking patients at the free clinic have a stronger belief in a paternalist model of the provider-patient relationship (P < .01). Better communication between patients and providers results in higher levels of autonomy (P < .01). Higher levels of educational attainment and better communication partnership were associated with higher levels of a free clinic patient's understanding of treatment risks (P < .01). This research study found that components of patient-centeredness are important considerations for improving patient autonomy among free clinic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samin Panahi
- Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | | | | | | | - Akiko Kamimura
- Department of Sociology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Galasiński D, Ziółkowska J, Elwyn G. Epistemic justice is the basis of shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 111:107681. [PMID: 36871402 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little evidence that share decision-making (SDM) is being successfully implemented, with a significant gap between theory and clinical practice. In this article we look at SDM explicitly acknowledging its social and cultural situatedness and examine it as a set of practices (e.g. actions, such as communicating, referring, or prescribing, and decisions relating to them). We study clinicians' communicative performance as anchored in the context of professional and institutional practice and within the expected behavioural norms of actors situated in clinical encounters. DISCUSSION We propose to see conditions for shared decision-making in terms of epistemic justice, an explicit acknowledgment and acceptance of the legitimacy of healthcare users and their accounts and knowledges. We propose that shared decision-making is primarily a communicative encounter which requires both participants to have equal communicative rights. It is a process that is started by the clinician's decision and requires the suspension of their inherent interactional advantage. CONCLUSION The epistemic-justice perspective we adopt leads to at least three implications for clinical practices. First, clinical training must go beyond the development of communication skills and focus more on an understanding of healthcare as a set of social practices. Second, we suggest medicine develop a stronger relationship with humanities and the social sciences. Third, we advocate that shared decision-making has issues of justice, equity, and agency at its core.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dariusz Galasiński
- Centre for Interdisciplinary Research into Health and Illness,University of Wrocław, Św. Jadwigi 3/4, 50-266 Wrocław, Poland.
| | - Justyna Ziółkowska
- University of Social Sciences and Humanities, ul. Ostrowskiego 30b, 53-238 Wrocław, Poland
| | - Glyn Elwyn
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy & Clinical Practice, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Birkeland S, Bismark M, Barry MJ, Möller S. 'My doctor should decide' - Predictors for healthcare users' stated preferences regarding medical decision-making. Patient Educ Couns 2023; 114:107825. [PMID: 37269622 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate predictors for healthcare users' declared decision control preferences and test their association with satisfaction in vignettes detailing various decision-making. METHODS Cross-sectional vignette survey within a representative general male population aged 45-70 years (response rate 30%). Survey vignettes illustrated different levels of patient involvement. Participants rated their satisfaction with healthcare illustrated and separately rated their 'control preferences'. Comparisons were conducted with linear regression. RESULTS Preferring the doctor to predominantly or exclusively decide (1588/6755 respondents) was associated with older age, being single, lower education, having chronic illness, and living in low-income and less populated areas, with fewer non-western immigrants. Following adjustment, lower education and chronic illness remained statistically significant. Personalities with less openness had preference for least control. When presented with specific clinical scenarios, respondents preferring active or passive roles were equally satisfied with scenarios demonstrating shared decision-making. DISCUSSION Some groups of healthcare users were more likely to say that they preferred their doctor to decide. However, findings suggest that control preference statements, prior to facing a decision, should be interpreted with caution. PRACTICAL VALUE Study findings highlight that patients vary regarding their expressed wish for control in medical decision-making but they seem equally satisfied with shared decision-making scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Søren Birkeland
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9 a, 3. floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.
| | - Marie Bismark
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Michael J Barry
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Sören Möller
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark and Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, J. B. Winsløws Vej 9 a, 3. floor, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mayer TK, Becker-Hebly I, Elaut E, Heylens G, Kreukels BPC, Nieder TO. Desired decision-making role and treatment satisfaction among trans people during medical transition: results from the ENIGI follow-up study. J Sex Med 2023; 20:893-904. [PMID: 37037786 DOI: 10.1093/jsxmed/qdad039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/01/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making (SDM) is particularly important in transition-related medical interventions (TRMIs) given the nature of treatment and history of gatekeeping in transgender health care. Yet few studies have investigated trans people's desired decision-making role within TRMI and factors that influence these desires. AIMS The study investigated trans people's desired level of decision making during medical transition as well as possible sociodemographic predictors and correlations between decision-making desires and satisfaction with treatment. METHODS Data were collected from a clinical sample from 3 trans health care centers, as part of the larger ENIGI study. The data consisted of 568 trans individuals (60.2% assigned male at birth) 20 to 82 years of age (mean age = 38.58 years) who took part in the study 4 to 6 years after initial clinical contact. Binary logistic regressions were conducted to determine whether independent variables predicted group membership in decision-making role subgroups while a Spearman rank-order correlation was conducted to determine the relationship between desired decision-making involvement and satisfaction with care. OUTCOMES Main measures were desired decision-making role, satisfaction with treatment, age, education level, country of residence, treatment status, individual treatment progress score (ITPS), gender identity, and sex assigned at birth. RESULTS The vast majority of participants wanted to make medical decisions themselves. Age, education level, country of residence, treatment status, gender identity, and sex assigned at birth showed no significant effects in desired level of decision making, while the ITPS neared significance. Satisfaction with treatment was overall very high. For participants assigned male at birth, desire for a more active role in decision making was negatively correlated with satisfaction of labia surgery. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS A desired decision-making role cannot be predicted based on the trans person's sociodemographic characteristics. More involvement from health professionals addressing medical information and education obligations may be needed when offering surgical construction of labia to individuals assigned male at birth. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS This study builds on the few existing analyses of desired levels of decision-making role among trans people during transition. It is the first to investigate the role of education level and treatment status/ITPS on the desire of decision-making role. Gender identity and influence of nonbinary identity were not investigated for treatment satisfaction as these items were presented based on sex assigned at birth. CONCLUSION This study highlights that trans people in 3 European trans health care centers during medical transition desire a more active role in decision making. Satisfaction with treatment received was overall very high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toby K Mayer
- Institute for Sex Research, Sexual Medicine, and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Inga Becker-Hebly
- Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Els Elaut
- Department of Experimental, Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
- Center of Sexology and Gender, University Hospital Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Gunter Heylens
- Center of Sexology and Gender, University Hospital Ghent, 9000 Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
| | - Baudewijntje P C Kreukels
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Timo O Nieder
- Interdisciplinary Transgender Health Care Center Hamburg, Department for Sex Research and Forensic Psychiatry, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Damiaens A, Van Hecke A, Foulon V. Medication Decision-Making and the Medicines' Pathway in Nursing Homes: Experiences and Expectations of Involvement of Residents and Informal Caregivers. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2023; 20:5936. [PMID: 37297540 PMCID: PMC10253180 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20115936] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information on how residents and their informal caregivers are involved in the medicines' pathway in nursing homes is scarce. Likewise, it is not known how they would prefer to be involved therein. METHODS A generic qualitative study using semi-structured interviews with 17 residents and 10 informal caregivers from four nursing homes was performed. Interview transcripts were analyzed using an inductive thematic framework. RESULTS Four themes were derived to describe resident and informal caregiver involvement in the medicines' pathway. First, residents and informal caregivers show behaviors of involvement across the medicines' pathway. Second, their attitude towards involvement was mainly one of resignation, but variation was noted in their involvement preferences, ranging from minimal information to active participation needs. Third, institutional and personal factors were found to contribute to the resigned attitude. Last, situations were identified that drive residents and informal caregivers to act, regardless of their resigned attitude. CONCLUSIONS Resident and informal caregiver involvement in the medicines' pathway is limited. Nevertheless, interviews show that information and participation needs are present and show potential for residents' and informal caregivers' contribution to the medicines' pathway. Future research should explore initiatives to increase the understanding and acknowledgement of opportunities for involvement and to empower residents and informal caregivers to take on their roles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amber Damiaens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Hecke
- Department of Nursing Director, Ghent University Hospital, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
| | - Veerle Foulon
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Büdenbender B, Köther AK, Grüne B, Michel MS, Kriegmair MC, Alpers GW. When attitudes and beliefs get in the way of shared decision-making: A mediation analysis of participation preference. Health Expect 2023; 26:740-751. [PMID: 36639880 PMCID: PMC10010103 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 11/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Certain sociodemographic characteristics (e.g., older age) have previously been identified as barriers to patients' participation preference in shared decision-making (SDM). We aim to demonstrate that this relationship is mediated by the perceived power imbalance that manifests itself in patients' negative attitudes and beliefs about their role in decision-making. METHODS We recruited a large sample (N = 434) of outpatients with a range of urological diagnoses (42.2% urooncological). Before the medical consultation at a university hospital, patients completed the Patients' Attitudes and Beliefs Scale and the Autonomy Preference Index. We evaluated attitudes as a mediator between sociodemographic factors and participation preference in a path model. RESULTS We replicated associations between relevant sociodemographic factors and participation preference. Importantly, attitudes and beliefs about one's own role as a patient mediated this relationship. The mediation path model explained a substantial proportion of the variance in participation preference (27.8%). Participation preferences and attitudes did not differ for oncological and nononcological patients. CONCLUSION Patients' attitudes and beliefs about their role determine whether they are willing to participate in medical decision-making. Thus, inviting patients to participate in SDM should encompass an assessment of their attitudes and beliefs. Importantly, negative attitudes may be accessible to change. Unlike stable sociodemographic characteristics, such values are promising targets for interventions to foster more active participation in SDM. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This study was part of a larger project on implementing SDM in urological practice. Several stakeholders were involved in the design, planning and conduction of this study, for example, three authors are practising urologists, and three are psychologists with experience in patient care. In addition, the survey was piloted with patients, and their feedback was integrated into the questionnaire. The data presented in this study is based on patients' responses. Results may help to empower our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Björn Büdenbender
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Anja K Köther
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Britta Grüne
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maurice S Michel
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Maximilian C Kriegmair
- Department of Urology and Urosurgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Georg W Alpers
- Department of Psychology, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Nogueira-Leite D, Cruz-Correia R. Attitudes of Physicians and Individuals Toward Digital Mental Health Tools: Protocol for a Web-Based Survey Research Project. JMIR Res Protoc 2023; 12:e41040. [PMID: 36917172 PMCID: PMC10131781 DOI: 10.2196/41040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital transformation is impacting health care delivery. Great market dynamism is bringing opportunities and concerns alike into public discussion. Digital health apps are a vibrant segment where regulation is emerging, with Germany paving the way with its DiGA (Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen, in German, meaning digital health apps) program. Simultaneously, mental ill-health constitutes a global health concern, and prevalence is expected to worsen due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its containment measures. Portugal and its National Health System may be a useful testbed for digital health interventions. OBJECTIVE The paper outlines the protocol for a research project on the attitudes of physicians and potential users toward digital mental health apps to improve access to care, patient outcomes, and reduce the burden of disease of mental ill-health. METHODS Web surveys will be conducted to acquire data from the main stakeholders (physicians and the academic community). Data analysis will replicate the statistical analysis performed in the studies from Dahlhausen and Borghouts to derive conclusions regarding the relative acceptance and likelihood of successful implementation of digital mental health apps in Portugal. RESULTS The findings of the proposed studies will elicit important information on how physicians and individuals perceive digital mental health app interventions to improve access to care, patient outcomes, and reduce the burden of disease of mental ill-health. Data collection ran between September 26 and November 6, 2022, for the first study and September 20 and October 20, 2022, for the second study. We obtained 160 responses to the first study's survey and 539 answers to the second study's survey. Data analysis is concluded, and both studies' results are expected to be published in 2023. CONCLUSIONS The results of the studies projected in this research protocol will have implications for researchers and academia, industry, and policy makers concerning the adoption and implementation of digital health mental apps and associated interventions. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/41040.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diogo Nogueira-Leite
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Nova School of Business and Economics Health and Economics Knowledge Center, New University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.,Programme in Health Data Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ricardo Cruz-Correia
- Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Carlisle EM, Shinkunas LA, Lieberman MT, Hoffman RM, Reisinger HS. "Reading the room:" A qualitative analysis of pediatric surgeons' approach to clinical counseling. J Pediatr Surg 2023; 58:503-509. [PMID: 35973862 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In our prior analysis of parental preferences for discussions with pediatric surgeons, we identified that parents prefer more guidance from surgeons when discussing cancer surgery, emergency surgery, or surgery for infants, and they prefer to engage surgeons by asking questions. In this study, we investigate surgeon preferences for decision making discussions in pediatric surgery. METHODS We conducted a thematic content analysis of interviews of pediatric surgeons regarding their preferences for discussing surgery with parents. Board certified/board eligible pediatric surgeons who had been in practice for at least one year and spoke English were eligible. Fifteen surgeons were invited, and twelve 30-minute semi-structured interviews were completed (80%). Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Thematic content analysis was performed using deductive and inductive methods. RESULTS Data saturation was achieved after 12 interviews [6 women (50%), median years in practice 6.25, 10 in academic practice (83%), 8 from Midwest (67%)]. 5 themes emerged: (1) Collaboration to promote parental engagement; (2) "Cancer is distinct but not unique;" (3) "Read the room:" tailoring discussions to specific parental needs; (4) Perceived role of the surgeon; (5) Limited experience with decision support tools in pediatric surgery. CONCLUSIONS Pediatric surgeons prefer a collaborative approach to counseling that engages parents through education. They prioritize tailoring discussions to meet parental needs. Few have utilized decision support tools, however most expressed interest. Insight gained from our work will guide development of a decision support tool that empowers parental participation in counseling for pediatric surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erica M Carlisle
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Department of Surgery, Division of Pediatric Surgery, Iowa City, IA, USA; University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Program in Bioethics and Humanities, Iowa City, IA, USA.
| | - Laura A Shinkunas
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Program in Bioethics and Humanities, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | | | - Richard M Hoffman
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, Department of Internal Medicine, USA
| | - Heather Schacht Reisinger
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Program in Bioethics and Humanities, Iowa City, IA, USA; University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, Department of Internal Medicine, USA; University of Original article Iowa, Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Mellqvist UH, Steinmetz HT, Perrot A, Aerts E, Williams P, Vallejo A, Morgan K, Plate A, Rodríguez-Leboeuf AM, Desgraz R, Franck EH, De Costa L, Brescianini A, Ludwig H. Patient Confidence and Information Preferences during the Treatment Decision-making Process: Results from a Large Multiple Myeloma Patient Survey Across 12 Countries in Europe and Israel. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia 2023; 23:e240-e251.e12. [PMID: 36967243 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The relapsing nature of multiple myeloma (MM) means that patients typically receive different and multiple lines of therapy, requiring many treatment decisions over the disease course. The aim of this study was to explore patient confidence and information preferences during the treatment decision-making process. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multinational, cross-sectional survey enrolled patients with MM. It was co-developed and distributed by Myeloma Patients Europe across 12 countries in Europe and Israel from May 2019 to March 2020. Eligibility criteria included a self-reported diagnosis of MM and being able to recall the decision-making process at the start of their latest treatment line. RESULTS A total of 1559 patients were included, with complete responses received from 1081 (69%) patients. The median age range was 54 to 64 years; there was an equal gender split and 57% had their latest treatment decision made within the past year. Overall, 54% of patients felt "very confident" in the latest treatment decision. Patients deemed the most important information to be safety/tolerability and treatment effectiveness, but the latter was among the least frequently received. Most patients reported that their primary physician treating MM was their main source for all types of information (range, 62%-94%), with 87% of patients reporting a "very good" or "good" relationship with them. CONCLUSION Over half of patients felt very confident in their latest treatment decision; however, patients reported not routinely receiving important treatment effectiveness information. Addressing the discrepancies between information that patients receive and consider important may enhance confidence in decision-making.
Collapse
|
35
|
Patti F, Chisari CG, Toscano S, Annovazzi P, Banfi P, Bergamaschi R, Clerici R, Conti MZ, Cortese A, Fantozzi R, Ferraro D, Fischetti M, Frigo M, Gatto M, Immovilli P, Leoni S, Malucchi S, Maniscalco G, Marfia GA, Paolicelli D, Perini P, Serrati C, Totaro R, Turano G, Valentino P, Zaffaroni M, Zuliani C, Centonze D. Patients with multiple sclerosis choose a collaborative role in making treatment decision: results from the Italian multicenter SWITCH study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 70:104474. [PMID: 36584654 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinicians are increasingly recognizing the importance of shared decision-making in complex treatment choices, highlighting the importance of the patient's rationale and motivation for switching therapies. This study aimed to evaluate the association between different modalities of changing multiple sclerosis (MS) treatments, cognitive profile and attitude and preferences of patients concerning treatment choice. METHODS This multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted at 28 Italian MS centers in the period between June 2016 and June 2017. We screened all MS patients treated with any DMT, with a treatment compliance of at least 80% of therapy administered during the 3 last months who needed to modify MS therapy because of efficacy, safety or other reasons during a follow-up visit. At the time of switching the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) and the Control Preference Scale (CPS) were evaluated. According to the CPS, patients were classified as "active" (i.e. who prefer making the medical decision themselves), "collaborative" (i.e. who prefer decisions be made jointly with the physician), or "passive" (i.e. who prefer the physician make the decision). RESULTS Out of 13,657 patients recorded in the log, 409 (3%) changed therapy. Of these, 336 (2.5%) patients, 69.6% were female and with mean age 40.6 ± 10.5 years, were enrolled. According to the CPS score evaluation, a significant high percentage of patients (51.1%) were considered collaborative, 74 patients (22.5%) were passive, and 60 (18.2%) patients were active. Stratifying according to CPS results, we found a higher SDMT score among collaborative patients compared to active and passive ones (45.8 ± 12.3 versus 41.0 ± 13.2 versus 41.7 ± 12.8, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION In this study, the CPS evaluation showed that more than 50% of patients who needed to change therapy chose a "collaborative" role in making treatment decision. Cognitive profile with SDMT seems to correlate with patients' preference on treatment decision, showing better scores in collaborative patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Patti
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, via S. Sofia 78, Catania 95129, Italy.
| | - Clara Grazia Chisari
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Simona Toscano
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, via S. Sofia 78, Catania 95129, Italy
| | - Pietro Annovazzi
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Hospital of Gallarate - ASST della Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | - Paola Banfi
- Operative Unit of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Varese, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Cortese
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza, University of Rome, Italy
| | | | - Diana Ferraro
- Department of Neuroscience, UO of Neurology, AOU Policlinico OB, Modena, Italy
| | | | - Maura Frigo
- Neurology Department, San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy
| | - Maurizia Gatto
- Department of Neurology, General Regional Hospital "Miulli", Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Paolo Immovilli
- Emergency Department, Neurology Unit, G. da Saliceto Hospital, Piacenza, Italy
| | | | - Simona Malucchi
- SCDO Neurologia-CRESM, University Hospital San Luigi Gonzaga, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Girolama Alessandra Marfia
- Department of Systems Medicine, Multiple Sclerosis Clinical & Research Center, "Tor Vergata" University, Rome, Italy
| | - Damiano Paolicelli
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Perini
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Neurological Clinic, University Hospital of Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Serrati
- Operative Unit of Neurology and Stroke Unit, IRCCS Hospital San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Rocco Totaro
- Department of Neurology, Demyelinating Disease Center, San Salvatore Hospital, L'Aquila, Italy
| | - Gabriella Turano
- Department of Neurology, Mondovì General Hospital, Local Health Authority CN1, Mondovì, Cuneo, Italy
| | | | - Mauro Zaffaroni
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Hospital of Gallarate - ASST della Valle Olona, Gallarate, Italy
| | | | - Diego Centonze
- Department "GF Ingrassia" Section of Neurosciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy; Unit of Neurology - IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, Isernia, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Wu M, Li Y, Ma C. Patients' choice preferences for specialist outpatient online consultations: A discrete choice experiment. Front Public Health 2023; 10:1075146. [PMID: 36684861 PMCID: PMC9850164 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1075146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Internet hospitals are multiplying with solid support from the Chinese government. In internet hospitals, specialist outpatient online consultations (SOOC) are the primary services. However, the acceptance and utilization rates of this service are still low. Thus, the study of patients' choice preferences for SOOC is needed. Objective To analyze the choice preference of patients' SOOC via a discrete choice experiment, understand the influence of each factor and promote the development of internet hospitals. Methods Via a discrete selection experiment, a total of 162 patients from two general hospitals and three specialized hospitals in Beijing were selected for the questionnaire survey. The choice preferences were analyzed by conditional logit regression. Results From high to low, patients' willingness to pay (WTP) for the attributes of SOOC is as follows: doctors' recommendation rate (β highly recommend = 0.999), the convenience of applying SOOC services (β Convenient = 0.760), the increasing ratio of medical insurance payment for online services compared to offline (β Increase by 10% = 0.545), and the disease's severity (β severe = -3.024). The results of the subgroup analysis showed differences in patient choice preference by age, whether the patients had chronic diseases, income, and medical insurance types. Conclusion Both price and nonprice attributes influence the choice preference of SOOC for patients. Among them, patients are more inclined to choose SOOC when doctors highly recommend it, when it is convenient to apply, when medical insurance increases by 10%, and when disease severity is mild. The current findings show the government and medical institutions formulate auxiliary policies and welfare strategies by clarifying core attributes and adjusting the levels of different attributes to improve patients' acceptance of SOOC. The utility of SOOC and the further development of internet hospitals are radically promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mengqiu Wu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Laboratory of Genetics, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhan Li
- School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Chengyu Ma
- School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Gregory EF, Cronholm PF, Johnson GT, Maddox AI, Kellom K, Levine LD, Lorch SA, Fiks AG, Resnicow K. A Qualitative Study of Perspectives of Black Women on Autonomy and Motivational Interviewing. Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle) 2023; 4:94-102. [PMID: 36874236 PMCID: PMC9983129 DOI: 10.1089/whr.2022.0094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Motivational interviewing (MI) is an evidence-based strategy to modify health behaviors, including some risk factors for adverse birth outcomes. Black women, who have disproportionately high rates of adverse birth outcomes, have reported mixed preferences on MI. This study explored the acceptability of MI among Black women who are at high risk for adverse birth outcomes. Methods We conducted qualitative interviews with women with a history of preterm birth. Participants were English-language proficient and had Medicaid-insured infants. We purposively oversampled women whose infants had medical complexity. Interviews explored experiences with health care and health behaviors after birth. The interview guide was iteratively developed to obtain specific reactions to MI by including videos demonstrating MI-consistent and MI-inconsistent counseling. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded following an integrated approach in which we applied a priori codes related to MI and allowed themes to emerge from the data. Results We interviewed 30 non-Hispanic Black women from October 2018 to July 2021. Eleven viewed the videos. Participants emphasized the importance of autonomy in decision-making and health behavior. Participants expressed a preference for MI-consistent clinical approaches, including autonomy support and building rapport, considering them respectful, nonjudgmental, and likely to support change. Conclusions In this sample of Black women with a history of preterm birth, participants valued an MI-consistent clinical approach. Incorporating MI into clinical care may improve the experience of health care among Black women, thus serving as one strategy to promote equity in birth outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily F Gregory
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Peter F Cronholm
- PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Geminesse T Johnson
- Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Adya I Maddox
- Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Katherine Kellom
- PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lisa D Levine
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Maternal Fetal Medicine Research Program, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Scott A Lorch
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Alexander G Fiks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,Clinical Futures, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.,PolicyLab, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kenneth Resnicow
- Department of Health Behavior and Health Education, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Austin JD, Shelton E, Crookes DM, Tehranifar P, Neugut AI, Shelton RC. Involvement in Chemotherapy Decision Making among Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer. MDM Policy Pract 2023; 8:23814683231163189. [PMID: 37009635 PMCID: PMC10052499 DOI: 10.1177/23814683231163189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background. To explore preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making among stage II and III colon cancer (CC) patients by sociodemographic, interpersonal, and intrapersonal communication factors. Methods. Cross-sectional exploratory study collecting self-reported survey data from stage II and III CC patients from 2 cancer centers located in northern Manhattan. Results. Of 88 patients approached, 56 completed the survey. Only 19.3% reported shared involvement in their chemotherapy decisions. We observed significant differences in preferred involvement by gender, with women preferring more physician-controlled decisions. CC patients with higher levels of decisional self-efficacy significantly preferred shared decisions (F = 4.4 [2], P = 0.02). Actual involvement in decisions differed by race (physician controlled 33% for White v. 67% for Other, P < 0.01), age (shared control 18% for ≤55 y, 55% for 55-64 y, and 27% for 65+ y, P = 0.04), and perception of choice (shared control 73% "yes" v. 27% "no,"P = 0.02). Actual or preferred involvement did not differ by stage. Significantly higher levels of medical mistrust (discrimination t = 2.8 [50], P = 0.01; lack of support t = 3.6 [49], P < 0.01), and lower levels of decisional self-efficacy (t = 2.5 [49], P = 0.01) were reported among women. Discussion. Reports of shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions is limited among CC patients. Factors influencing preferred versus actual chemotherapy decision making are complex and may differ; hence, more research is needed to understand and address factors contributing to discordance between preferred and actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making for CC patients. Highlights Shared involvement around chemotherapy decisions remains limited for patients diagnosed with colon cancer.Sociodemographic (age, race, gender), interpersonal (medical mistrust), and intrapersonal (decisional self-efficacy, perception of choice) factors that influence preferred involvement in chemotherapy decision making may differ from those influencing actual involvement in chemotherapy decision making.Shared involvement in chemotherapy decisions may look different than currently conceptualized, notably when uncertainty around the benefits exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica D. Austin
- Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Sciences, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Elizabeth Shelton
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Danielle M. Crookes
- Department of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anthropology and Sociology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Parisa Tehranifar
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of
Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alfred I. Neugut
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Rachel C. Shelton
- Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kang E, Jethani P, Foster ER. Person-centered goal setting is feasible in people with Parkinson's disease who have subjective cognitive decline: a mixed methods study. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:90-97. [PMID: 35023794 PMCID: PMC9719695 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2025930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Revised: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluate the feasibility of person-centered goal setting in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have subjective cognitive decline and explore characteristics of the formulated goals. MATERIALS AND METHODS Participants completed person-centered goal setting as a part of two cognitive intervention studies. Participants were guided to develop at least three goals and rate the importance of each goal using a 10-point scale (1: not at all important - 10: extremely important). To evaluate the feasibility of person-centered goal setting, we calculated the mean number of formulated goals per person and the importance level of all goals. To explore goal characteristics, two independent authors coded all goals and synthesized them using deductive content analysis in consultation with the senior author. RESULTS Thirty participants formulated a total of 166 goals. The mean number of formulated goals per participant was 5.53 (SD = 2.22, range = 3 - 10). The mean importance level of all formulated goals was 8.3 (SD = 1.49, range = 4 - 10). Formulated goals ranged across diverse domains and categories. CONCLUSIONS Person-centered goal setting is feasible to guide people with PD to formulate personally meaningful goals. Findings highlight the diverse cognitive rehabilitation needs of people with PD, potential cognitive rehabilitation priorities, and future goal setting research directions.Implications for rehabilitationRehabilitation clinicians and researchers should not assume that people with PD who have subjective cognitive decline are not capable of engaging in their goal setting.Rehabilitation clinicians and researchers should acknowledge and act on our responsibility to enable people with PD who have subjective cognitive decline to engage in goal setting.Rehabilitation clinicians and researchers are encouraged to explore diverse goal domains to optimize goal setting and rehabilitation care among people with PD who have subjective cognitive decline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunyoung Kang
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Pooja Jethani
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Louisiana State University of Health Sciences, Shreveport, LA, USA
| | - Erin R. Foster
- Program in Occupational Therapy, Department of Neurology, & Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jessurun CAC, Broekman MLD. True shared decision-making in neurosurgical oncology: does it really exist? Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2023; 165:11-13. [PMID: 36571627 DOI: 10.1007/s00701-022-05452-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Charissa A C Jessurun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512VA, The Hague, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Marike L D Broekman
- Department of Neurosurgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333ZA, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
- Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center, Lijnbaan 32, 2512VA, The Hague, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Catalán À, Gastaldo I, Roura E, Massanes T, Escarrabill J, Moizé V. Influence of Nutrition Training, Eating Habits, and Culinary Skills of Health Care Professionals and Its Impact in the Promotion of Healthy Eating Habits. TOP CLIN NUTR 2023; 38:66-76. [DOI: 10.1097/tin.0000000000000307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
42
|
Latortue-Albino P, Delgado S, Perkins R, Yarrington C, Mehta P. Voices on Zika: Reproductive Autonomy and Shared Decision-Making During an Evolving Epidemic. Womens Health Issues 2022:S1049-3867(22)00141-4. [PMID: 36566090 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aimed to understand the degree to which pregnant individuals exposed to emerging infections, such as Zika, are engaged by providers in shared decision-making and explore potential barriers to inform strategies to improve care for those most at risk for inequities. Studies have demonstrated that Latinx and Black people are less likely to engage in shared decision-making and are less engaged by providers. Limited research explores factors impacting shared decision-making in prenatal care and in the setting of recent epidemics. METHODS We conducted an exploratory qualitative study of individuals eligible for prenatal screening owing to Zika exposure during pregnancy. Given an established connection between autonomy and shared decision-making, we used the Reproductive Autonomy Scale and the Three Talk Model for shared decision-making to inform our semistructured interview guide. Interviews were conducted in Spanish or English. and participants were recruited from a federally qualified health center and a tertiary care obstetric clinic until thematic saturation was achieved. Interviews were recorded, translated, and transcribed and two coders used modified grounded theory to generate themes. RESULTS We interviewed 18 participants from May to December 2017. Participant narratives demonstrated reproductive autonomy in pregnancy decision-making, with decision support from families, fatalism in pregnancy planning, and limited engagement by providers around decisions and implications of Zika virus testing. Hierarchy in provider dynamics, perceived stigma around emigration and travel, and language barriers impacted participant engagement in shared decision-making. CONCLUSIONS Participants demonstrated personal autonomy in reproductive decision-making, but demonstrated limited engagement in shared decision-making with regard to prenatal Zika testing. Provider promotion of shared decision-making using culturally centered decision tools to elicit underlying beliefs and deepen context for option, choice, and decision talk is critical in prenatal counseling to support equitable outcomes during evolving pandemics.
Collapse
|
43
|
Barragan-Carrillo R, Pabon CM, Chavarri-Guerra Y, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Duma N. End-of-Life Care and Advanced Directives in Hispanic/Latinx Patients: Challenges and Solutions for the Practicing Oncologist. Oncologist 2022; 27:1074-1080. [PMID: 36288534 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Advanced end-of-life care (EOL) comprises a group of strategies to provide comfort to patients at the end of life. These are associated with better quality of life, better satisfaction, and a lower rate of hospitalizations and aggressive medical treatment. Advanced EOL care, including advanced directives completion and hospice enrollment, is suboptimal among Hispanic/Latinx patients with cancer due to personal, socio-cultural, financial, and health system-related barriers, as well as due to a lack of studies specifically designed for this population. In addition, the extrapolation of programs that increase participation in EOL for non-white Hispanics may not work appropriately for Hispanic/Latinx patients and lead to overall lower satisfaction and enrollment in EOL care. This review will provide the practicing oncologist with the tools to address EOL in the Hispanic/Latinx population. Some promising strategies to address the EOL care disparities in Latinx/Hispanic patients have been culturally tailored patient navigation programs, geriatric assessment-guided multidisciplinary interventions, counseling sessions, and educational interventions. Through these strategies, we encourage oncologists to take advantage of every clinical setting to discuss EOL care. Treating physicians can engage family members in caring for their loved ones while practicing cultural humility and respecting cultural preferences, incorporating policies to foster treatment for the underserved migrant population, and providing patients with validated Spanish language tools.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Barragan-Carrillo
- Hematology-Oncology Department Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Cindy M Pabon
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Yanin Chavarri-Guerra
- Hematology-Oncology Department Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | | | - Narjust Duma
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Funk LM, Mackenzie CS, Cherba M, Del Rosario N, Krawczyk M, Rounce A, Stajduhar K, Cohen SR. Where would Canadians prefer to die? Variation by situational severity, support for family obligations, and age in a national study. Palliat Care 2022; 21:139. [PMID: 35909120 PMCID: PMC9340714 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-022-01023-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Death at home has been identified as a key quality indicator for Canadian health care systems and is often assumed to reflect the wishes of the entire Canadian public. Although research in other countries has begun to question this assumption, there is a dearth of rigorous evidence of a national scope in Canada. This study addresses this gap and extends it by exploring three factors that moderate preferences for setting of death: situational severity (entailing both symptoms and supports), perceptions of family obligation, and respondent age.
Methods
Two thousand five hundred adult respondents from the general population were recruited using online panels between August 2019 and January 2020. The online survey included three vignettes, representing distinct dying scenarios which increased in severity based on symptom management alongside availability of formal and informal support. Following each vignette respondents rated their preference for each setting of death (home, acute/intensive care, palliative care unit, nursing home) for that scenario. They also provided sociodemographic information and completed a measure of beliefs about family obligations for end-of-life care.
Results
Home was the clearly preferred setting only for respondents in the mild severity scenario. As the dying scenario worsened, preferences fell for home death and increased for the other options, such that in the severe scenario, most respondents preferred a palliative care or hospice setting. This pattern was particularly distinct among respondents who also were less supportive of family obligation norms, and for adults 65 years of age and older.
Conclusions
Home is not universally the preferred setting for dying. The public, especially older persons and those expressing lower expectations of families in general, express greater preference for palliative care settings in situations where they might have less family or formal supports accompanied by more severe and uncontrolled symptoms. Findings suggest a) the need for public policy and health system quality indicators to reflect the nuances of public preferences, b) the need for adequate investment in hospices and palliative care settings, and c) continuing efforts to ensure that home-based formal services are available to help people manage symptoms and meet their preferences for setting of death.
Collapse
|
45
|
Reid HW, Parente V, Gupta MD, Hantzmon S, Olsen MK, Yang H, Jackson LR, Johnson KS, Pollak KI. Examining the relationship between clinician communication and patient participatory behaviors in cardiology encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2022; 105:3473-3478. [PMID: 36137906 PMCID: PMC9903298 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 09/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Examine the association of coder ratings of cardiologist behaviors and global scores of cardiologist communication style with patient participation in clinic encounters. METHODS We coded transcripts of clinic encounters for patient participatory behaviors: asking questions, assertive statements, and expressing negative emotions; clinician behavior counts: reflective statements, open-ended questions, empathic statements, and eliciting questions. We used general linear regression models to examine associations of mean number of patient participatory behaviors with clinician behaviors. RESULTS Our sample included 161 patients of 40 cardiologists. Patient female gender was associated with on average 2.1 (CI: 0.06, 4.1; p = 0.04) more patient participatory behaviors. In an adjusted model, clinician reflective statements were associated with on average 0.3 (CI: 0.04, 0.4; p = 0.02) more patient participatory behaviors. A clinician making at least one empathic statement was associated with on average 3.7 (CI: 0.2, 7.1; p = 0.04) more patient participatory behaviors. CONCLUSIONS These results demonstrate that some individual clinician behaviors are associated with higher patient participation in cardiology encounters. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinician reflective and empathic statements may be important targets in communication training to increase patient participation. SECTION Communication Studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Victoria Parente
- Department of Pediatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| | - Maya Das Gupta
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, USA
| | - Sarah Hantzmon
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, USA
| | - Maren K Olsen
- Duke University Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, USA; Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Durham, USA
| | - Hongqiu Yang
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Larry R Jackson
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Kimberly S Johnson
- Department of Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA; Center for Aging and Human Development, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA; Geriatrics Research Education and Clinical Center, Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Kathryn I Pollak
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, USA; Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Romero SA, Rasmussen A, Raue PJ. Treatment Decision-Making Preferences of Older Depressed Minority Primary Care Patients. Community Ment Health J 2022; 59:719-727. [PMID: 36445539 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01055-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Little research examined the decision-making preferences of older, racially and ethnically diverse minority patients with untreated depression. The study's aims were to identify decision-making preferences and the characteristics associated with a more active preference in the decision-making process for general medical and depression treatment decisions. We assessed the preferred involvement in making general medical and depression treatment decisions of 201 older primary care patients with untreated depression. Linear regressions examined the association of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics with decision-making preference for both decision types. Majority of patients preferred shared decision-making for general medical and depression treatments. Female gender was associated with a preference for active decision-making for depression treatment. For this sample older depressed patients preferred sharing the decision-making responsibilities with physicians. To improve communication and the initiation and adherence to mental health care, physicians must consider older, minority patients' preferences for involvement in the decision-making process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara A Romero
- Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, 02115, Boston, MA, USA.
| | | | - Patrick J Raue
- University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Seale H, Carlson SJ, Maley M, Clezy K, Torda A, Konecny P. Lifting the curtains of silence: Patient perceptions towards needs and responsibilities in contributing to the prevention of healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial resistance. Am J Infect Control 2022:S0196-6553(22)00814-8. [PMID: 36442687 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 11/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beyond the use of policy and system-focused approaches, it has been established globally that patients can play a role in enhancing the health care landscape. However, efforts to meaningfully translate patient engagement strategies that promote participation by hospitalized patients in relevant infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship activities have not yet been realized. This study mapped the key factors acting as barriers and facilitators of patient engagement using a theoretical framework to identify potential new approaches to promote engagement. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted with 36 patients from 3 major hospitals in Sydney, Australia, in 2019. Transcripts were inductively analyzed, with the resulting themes categorized into the components of the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation-Behavior model. RESULTS The themes regarding barriers to patient engagement with relevant infection prevention and antimicrobial stewardship activities were: (1) Capability: misunderstanding and knowledge gaps about antimicrobial resistance; (2) Opportunity: strong family/patient support networks and good relationships with nursing staff provide an opportunity to support engagement; (3) Motivation: those who have some level of understanding or experience see the benefit and are most likely to engage actively. CONCLUSIONS Assuming patients are inclined to participate in efforts, a logical starting point would be to build awareness amongst patients and providers; however, education will not suffice. There needs to be a system and policy shift to ensure that patient engagement is recognized as a worthy endeavor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Seale
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
| | - Samantha J Carlson
- Wesfarmers Centre of Vaccines and Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; School of Social Sciences, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Maley
- Department of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, New South Wales Health Pathology, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kate Clezy
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Clinical Excellence Commission, NSW Health, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney New South Wales, Australia
| | - Adrienne Torda
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Pamela Konecny
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Department of Infectious Diseases, Immunology & Sexual Health, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Rishworth A, Cao T, Niraula A, Wilson K. Health Care Use and Barriers to Care for Chronic Inflammatory Diseases (CID) among First and Second Generation South Asian Immigrant Children and Parents in Ontario Canada. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022; 19:14608. [PMID: 36361486 PMCID: PMC9655293 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Although immigrants are disproportionately impacted by growing chronic inflammatory disease (CIDs) rates, yet suffer barriers to access health care, little attention has been given to their primary healthcare or specialist healthcare access as it relates to complex, chronic diseases in Canada, a country with universal health care. This study aims to investigate CID health care use and barriers to care among first- and second-generation immigrant South Asian children and parents in the Greater Toronto Area, Ontario. Drawing on analysis of 24 in depth interviews with children and parents (14 children, 10 parents), the results reveal that although CIDs disproportionately affects South Asian immigrants, they encounter health system, geographic, interpersonal, and knowledge barriers to access requisite care. These barriers exist despite participants having a GP, and are compounded further by limited familial systems, culturally insensitive care, and structural inequities that in some instances make parents choose between health access or other basic needs. Although all participants recognized the importance of specialized care, only 11 participants regularly accessed specialized care, creating new schisms in CID management. The findings suggest that a multisectoral approach that address individual and structural level socio-structural drivers of health inequities are needed to create more equitable healthcare access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Rishworth
- Department of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, Faculty Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
| | - Tiffany Cao
- Department of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, Faculty Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
| | - Ashika Niraula
- CERC in Migration and Integration, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - Kathi Wilson
- Department of Geography, Geomatics and Environment, Faculty Geography, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON L5L 1C6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing evidence for the potential benefits and harms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) medications in older people (>75 years) prompting updating of clinical guidelines. We explored the views of older people about CVD medication to inform guideline development. METHODS Qualitative study using semistructured interviews and focus groups. An ethnically diverse group of community dwelling older people were purposefully recruited from northern New Zealand using flyers in primary care clinics, local libraries, social groups, and places of worship, and by word of mouth. Interviews and focus groups were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed using an iterative and inductive approach to thematic analysis. RESULTS Thirty-nine participants from 4 ethnic groups were recruited (mean 74 years; range 61-91 years; Māori (7), South Asian (8), European (9), and Pasifika (15)). Most participants were taking CVD medication/s. Four main themes emerged: (i) emphasizing the benefits of CVD medication and downplaying the harms; (ii) feeling compelled to take medication; (iii) trusting "my" doctor; and (iv) expecting medication to be continued. CONCLUSION Findings raise questions about older people's agency in decision-making regarding CVD medication. CVD risk management guidelines for older people could include strategies to support effective communication of the potential benefits and harms of CVD medication in older people, balancing life expectancy, and the expected duration of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharine A Wallis
- School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- General Practice Clinical Unit, The University of Queensland, Level 8, Health Sciences Building, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | | | - Elizabeth F Fanueli
- School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | | - Susan Wells
- School of Population Health, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Raman S, Powell LE, Andersen ES, Nigro LC. One Size Does Not Fit All; Patient Preference for Breast Reconstruction. Eplasty 2022; 22:e44. [PMID: 36212604 PMCID: PMC9516762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A myriad of patient education modalities for breast reconstruction exist, although the optimal tools for patient education remain undetermined. The aim of this study is to determine patient preferences for breast reconstruction education modalities based on demographic variables. METHODS A prospective observational study at a tertiary care university health system was conducted between November 2020 and May 2021. A questionnaire was administered to breast reconstruction patients to collect information on demographics, research sources used before the initial appointment, and preferred education modalities. Differences based on age were analyzed using an independent samples t test, whereas a Fisher exact test was used to analyze differences based on ethnicity and education level. Statistical significance was defined as P < .05. RESULTS The most preferred patient education tools overall were books/written materials and videos. Younger patients were significantly more likely than older patients to have referenced additional physician sources (P = .0174) and to seek out information on the institution's website (P = .0465). Those with a college degree were significantly more likely to have performed research prior to the initial appointment (P = .0206). White patients were significantly more likely than nonwhite patients to talk to friends/family as a research source (P = .0150). CONCLUSIONS Regardless of age, education, or ethnicity, most patients prefer books/written materials and video presentations for education on breast reconstruction. Providers should strive to include written and video options to meet the needs of this diverse patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shreya Raman
- Department of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Lauren E Powell
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Emily S Andersen
- Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA
| | - Lauren C Nigro
- Breast Reconstruction & Restoration Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|