The Eastern European experience on occupational skin diseases. Make underreporting an issue?

Secondary and Tertiary Prevention: Medical Rehabilitation

Allergies are a major public health burden, and targeted measures are required in terms of prevention and treatment. The most common allergic conditions encompass atopic dermatitis (AD), food allergy (FA), allergic asthma (AA), and allergic rhino-conjunctivitis (AR). Primary prevention aims at preventing the onset of allergic disease, before the disease process begins. Secondary prevention aims at preventing progression and exacerbation of allergic disease whereas tertiary prevention aims at reducing disease burden in patients with established disease, by allergen immunotherapy (AIT) or medical rehabilitation. Rehabilitation programs are used for treatment of AA and AD and usually consist of extensive patient assessment, optimization of treatment management, patient education, and behavioral interventions, ideally involving a multidisciplinary treatment team and sometimes provided in a specific climate, usually alpine or maritime. Similarly, prevention of occupational skin diseases requires interdisciplinary approaches on the level of secondary and tertiary preventive intervention; if this is provided, then prevention programs have proven highly (cost-) effective. Unfortunately, the recently published Minimal Standards of Prevention of these dermatoses, underlining especially the importance of meticulous allergological diagnosis and subsequent multidisciplinary patient education, are so far being adhered to only in very few European countries.

Prevention of Hand Eczema among Nurse Apprentice (PREVEDERM): An Interventional Study

BACKGROUND

Workers in the healthcare sector are at high risk of developing occupational hand eczema mainly due to frequent exposure to irritants and/or allergens. Amongst workers in healthcare, nurses are at higher risk of developing hand dermatitis.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a short educational intervention program in preventing occupational hand eczema in nurse apprentices, using two objective tools, namely TEWL and EH, and the HECSI score.

METHODS

Data regarding professions, wet work exposure, activities performed during working hours, self-reported eczema were collected from 230 nurse students, divided in two study groups: the intervention and the control group (CG). The intervention group (IG) was given education about risks and proper skin care and was provided with cosmeceuticals to be used for skin care during hospital activity. The evaluation of skin properties was performed using questionnaires, HECSI score, measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and epidermal hydration (EH).

RESULTS

A number of 139 apprentice nurses completed the study. Of those participants who completed the study, 19.1% from CG and 19.6% from IG reported, at T1, hand eczema in the last 3 months, while at T2 (3 months later), 59.52 % of the CG and only 11.34 % from the IG stated having eczema in the last 3 months. In the IG, results showed an improvement of CM with 17% and of TEWL with 16%, with only a 0.5% improvement of CM in CG and a marked impairment of TEWL by 33%.

CONCLUSION

Hand eczema is a common occupational dermatosis affecting the medical staff, even during apprenticeship. Early preventive training programs are effective in reducing the burden of occupational contact dermatitis.

Is Occupational Skin Cancer More Aggressive than Sporadic Skin Cancer?

Background: Non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) represents the most frequently diagnosed cancer in humans. Occupational solar UV radiation exposure is associated with a higher-risk of developing NMSC, but still Romania does not acknowledge this affliction as an occupational disease. The study aims to determine if occupationally-induced NMSC is associated with more aggressive clinical and histopathological features compared to sporadic NMSC. Material and methods: A retrospective, analytical, comparative study was conducted during 2017-2019 in a University Department of Dermato-venereology in Bucharest, Romania, with focus on patients presenting with NMSC who underwent surgical excision of lesions followed by histopathological examination, classified as outdoor or indoor workers. High-risk clinical and histopathological characteristics were analysed and correlated with outdoor UV exposure. Outcomes: The study included 51 consecutive patients diagnosed with NMSC, of which 25 outdoor workers (OW) and 26 controls as indoor workers with no occupational UV exposure background. OW presented with 21 BCC and four SCC, while controls with 22 BCC and four SCC. Males were predominant in both groups and most patients came from urban environment. The mean age value was lower for the OW group compared to controls. OW had a 4.66 times higher risk of developing NMSC with aggressive location and size χ² (1, N=51) = 6.246, p=0.013, OR=4.66 (95% CI: 1.34, 16.23) and a 24-fold risk of developing NMSC with clinically poorly defined margins χ² (1, N=51) = 21.697, p<0.001, OR=24.44 (95% CI: 5.38,110.92). The risk of developing a high-risk histopathological subtype was 15 times greater for OW χ² (1, N=51) = 13.814, p<0.001, OR=15.27 (95% CI: 2.94,79.08). Moderate to severe desmoplastic reaction was 8.57 more frequent in controls χ² (1, N=51) = 12.244, p=0.001, OR=8.57 (95% CI: 2.42, 30.30). Grades 2 and 3 of actinic elastosis were significantly associated with outdoor work (χ² (1, N=51) = 33.382, p<0.001, OR=131.25 (95% CI: 13.60, 1266.37). The presence of ulceration and pigment association of tumors on the histopathological report were not significantly associated with outdoor working. Conclusion: 1. Occupational NMSC in Romania is associated with high-risk clinical features; 2. Poorly defined borders is a significant clinical high-risk factor associated with occupational UV exposure in NMSC; 3. High-risk histopathological subtypes are more frequently encountered in outdoor workers diagnosed with NMSC compared to indoor workers with no occupational UV exposure background; 4. Occupational NMSC is associated with significantly higher grades of desmoplastic reaction and of actinic elastosis compared to indoor workers.

Personal solar ultraviolet radiation dosimetry in an occupational setting across Europe

BACKGROUND

Work-related solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is an important factor in the pathogenesis of non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). The World Health Organization, through the International Agency for Research on Cancer, has classified solar UVR as a group 1 carcinogen since 2012. The main problems encountered so far in the study of occupationally induced skin cancer include the lack of accurate occupational UVR dosimetry as well as insufficient distinction between occupational and leisure UVR exposure and underreporting of NMSC.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to collect long-term individual UVR measurements in outdoor workers across European countries.

METHODS

A prospective study was initiated through the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, Healthy Skin@Work Campaign, measuring UVR exposure doses at occupational settings of masons from five European countries. Measurements were performed for several consecutive months using the GENESIS-UV measurement system.

RESULTS

The results identified alarming UVR exposure data. Average daily UVR doses ranged 148.40-680.48 J/m² in Romania, 342.4-640.8 J/m² in Italy, 165.5-466.2 J/m² in Croatia, 41.8-473.8 J/m² in Denmark and 88.15-400.22 J/m² in Germany. Results showed an expected latitude dependence with increasing UVR yearly dosage from the north to the south of Europe.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that outdoor workers from EU countries included in this study are exposed to high levels of occupational solar UVR, vastly exceeding the occupational exposure limits for solar UVR exposure, considered to be 1-1.33 SED/day in the period from May to September. This finding may serve as an evidence-based recommendation to authorities on implementing occupational skin cancer prevention strategies.

Occupational Exposure to Solar UV Radiation of a Group of Fishermen Working in the Italian North Adriatic Sea

Occupational solar radiation exposure is a relevant heath risk in the fishing sector. Our aim was to provide a detailed evaluation of individual UV exposure in three different fishing activities in Italy, with personal UV dosimeters and a simple formula to calculate the fraction of ambient erythemal UV dose received by the workers. The potential individual UV exposure of the fishermen was between 65 and 542 Joules/m². The percentages of the ambient exposure were estimated between 2.5% and 65.3%. Workers’ UV exposure was mainly influenced by the characteristics of the work activity, the postures adopted, and the type of boats. Overall, our data showed that 43% of the daily measurements could result largely above the occupational limits of 1–1.3 standard erythemal dose (i.e., 100 Joules/m²) per day, in case of exposure of uncovered skin areas. Measurements of individual UV exposure are important not only to assess the risk but also to increase workers’ perception and stimulate the adoption of preventive measures to reduce solar UV risk. Furthermore, the simple method proposed, linking ambient erythemal UV dose to the workers’ exposure, can be a promising tool for a reliable assessment of the UV risk, as time series of environmental UV dose are widely available.

Skin cancer in outdoor workers exposed to solar radiation: a largely underreported occupational disease in Italy

Background

Solar UV radiation (sUVR) is one of the main carcinogen exposures in occupational settings, and UV‐induced skin cancers are the most frequent tumours in fair‐skinned individuals worldwide.

Objectives

According to this premise, we should expect a high number of occupational skin cancers reported to the national workers’ compensation authorities each year, also considering that the incidence of skin cancers has been constantly increased in recent years

Methods

We examined the data on reported non‐melanoma skin cancers (NMSC) and actinic keratoses (AK) to the Italian National Workers Compensation Authority (INAIL) from 2012 to 2017, and we compared the number of reported skin cancers for outdoor workers with the expected numbers, obtained from currently available NMSC incidence rates for the Italian population applied to the occupational sUVR‐exposed workers estimated with the CAREX methodology in Italy in 2005.

Results

The cases of NMSC reported each year to INAIL in Italy are 34 per year on average, while for AK the mean number of reported cases is of only 15/year. We estimated a number of expected NMSC cases in Italy for solar UV‐exposed workers ranging between 432 and 983, representing a proportion between reported vs. expected skin cancers of only 3.5–6.2%.

Conclusions

Our study clearly shows that occupational skin cancers in Italy are largely underreported, and, accordingly, urgent initiatives should be taken to raise appropriate awareness to the problem of occupational sUVR‐induced skin cancers, so that adequate preventive measures can be implemented rapidly.

Physicians' opinions about the causes of underreporting of occupational diseases

Occupational diseases cause an important burden on health and economy; however, they are substantially underestimated. We aimed to investigate the opinions of physicians about causes of underreporting of occupational diseases. We collected data with a questionnaire, listing 30 possible causes for underreporting of occupational diseases. 478 physicians participated in the study. The first 3 most frequent causes perceived as "very important" are; employers' perception of occupational safety and health services as a loss of revenue (64.9%), prevalent employment without a legal contract (64.6%), and prevalent employment as subcontracted (59.4%). 52.1% of the physicians worked or currently working as an occupational physician. With the increase of working year as an occupational physician, there was a statistically significant decrease in the strength of importance for 17 of the 30 statements. This finding may be one of the important causes of underreporting of occupational diseases.