Treatment of a bilaterally severely resorbed posterior mandible due to early tooth loss by Guided Bone Regeneration using customized allogeneic bone blocks: A case report with 24 months follow-up data

Customized three-dimensional printed ceramic bone grafts for osseous defects: a prospective randomized study

Ridge resorption can result in insufficient bone volume for implant surgery, necessitating bone substitutes to restore the resorption area. Recent advances in computer-aided design and manufacturing enable the use of alloplastic bone graft materials with customizable compositions or shapes. This randomized study evaluated the clinical effectiveness of a customized three-dimensional (3D) printed alloplastic bone material. Sixty patients requiring guided bone regeneration for implant installation following tooth extraction due to alveolar bone resorption were recruited at two institutions. The participants were randomly allocated to either a group that received 3D-printed patient-customized bone graft material or a group that received conventional block bone graft material. Implant installation with bone harvesting was performed approximately 5 months after bone grafting. Histological and radiological assessments of the harvested bone area were performed. The experimental group had a significantly higher percent bone volume and a smaller tissue surface than the control group. Bone volume, bone surface, bone surface/volume ratio, bone surface density (bone surface/total volume), and bone mineral density did not differ significantly between groups. Patient-customized bone graft materials offer convenience and reduce patient discomfort. The findings suggest 3D-printed patient-customized bone graft materials could be used as an alternative for simpler bone grafting procedures.

Application of biodegradable Patient-specific scaffolds for maxillofacial bone regeneration: a scoping review of clinical studies

This study aimed to systematically review clinical studies in which biodegradable patient-specific scaffolds were used for bone regeneration. Studies in which biodegradable scaffolds were fabricated through computer-assisted design and computer-assisted manufacturing (CAD-CAM) procedures were included. Those that applied non-biodegradable materials or used biodegradable materials in a condensable powder or block form were excluded. Among a total of 26 included studies, 11 used customised allogeneic bone blocks, five used polycaprolactone (PCL)-containing scaffolds, four used hydroxyapatite (HA) scaffolds, and four biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP). The majority of the studies applied scaffolds for minor intraoral defects. All the large defects were reconstructed with polymer-containing scaffolds. Results of the included studies showed partial to complete filling of the defect following the application of biodegradable scaffolds. However, limited graft exposure was reported when using PCL, BCP, and HA scaffolds. Tissue engineering can be considered a potential method for the treatment of maxillofacial bone defects. However, more evidence is required, especially for the application of biodegradable scaffolds in large defects.

Ex Vivo and In Vivo Analyses of Novel 3D-Printed Bone Substitute Scaffolds Incorporating Biphasic Calcium Phosphate Granules for Bone Regeneration

(1) Background: The aim of this study was examining the ex vivo and in vivo properties of a composite made from polycaprolactone (PCL) and biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP) (synprint, ScientiFY GmbH) fabricated via fused deposition modelling (FDM); (2) Methods: Scaffolds were tested ex vivo for their mechanical properties using porous and solid designs. Subcutaneous implantation model analyzed the biocompatibility of PCL + BCP and PCL scaffolds. Calvaria implantation model analyzed the osteoconductive properties of PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds compared to BCP as control group. Established histological, histopathological and histomorphometrical methods were performed to evaluate new bone formation.; (3) Results Mechanical testing demonstrated no significant differences between PCL and PCL + BCP for both designs. Similar biocompatibility was observed subcutaneously for PCL and PCL + BCP scaffolds. In the calvaria model, new bone formation was observed for all groups with largest new bone formation in the BCP group, followed by the PCL + BCP group, and the PCL group. This finding was influenced by the initial volume of biomaterial implanted and remaining volume after 90 days. All materials showed osteoconductive properties and PCL + BCP tailored the tissue responses towards higher cellular biodegradability. Moreover, this material combination led to a reduced swelling in PCL + BCP; (4) Conclusions: Altogether, the results show that the newly developed composite is biocompatible and leads to successful osteoconductive bone regeneration. The new biomaterial combines the structural stability provided by PCL with bioactive characteristics of BCP-based BSM. 3D-printed BSM provides an integration behavior in accordance with the concept of guided bone regeneration (GBR) by directing new bone growth for proper function and restoration.

The Influence of Different Guided Bone Regeneration Procedures on the Contour of Bone Graft after Wound Closure: A Retrospective Cohort Study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of different guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures on bone graft contour after wound closure in lateral ridge augmentation. A total of 48 patients with 63 augmented sites were included in this study. Participants were divided into 4 groups (n = 12 in each group) based on different surgical procedures: group 1: particulate bone substitute + collagen membrane; group 2: particulate bone substitute + collagen membrane + healing cap, group 3: particulate bone substitute + injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) + collagen membrane; group 4: particulate bone substitute + i-PRF + surgical template + collagen membrane. After wound closure, the thickness of labial graft was measured at 0–5 mm apical to the implant shoulder (T0–T5). At T0–T2, the thickness of labial graft in group 4 was significantly higher than the other three groups (p < 0.05). And group 4 showed significantly more labial graft thickness than group 1 and group 2 at T3–T5 (p < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, the use of i-PRF in combination with the surgical template in GBR may contribute to achieving an appropriate bone graft contour after wound closure.

Customized allogeneic bone grafts for maxillary horizontal augmentation: A 5-year follow-up radiographic and histologic evaluation

We report the histological evaluation of an individualized allogeneic bone block 5 years after alveolar ridge augmentation. The biopsy showed a well-vascularized lamellar bone with fatty incorporations without any avital allograft remnants. The presence of osteocytes, lining cells, macrophages, and blood vessels indicated a healthy and vital bone tissue.

Osseous ingrowth in allogeneic bone blocks applied for vertical bone augmentation: a preclinical randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present study was the qualitative and quantitative evaluation of osseous graft consolidation using allogeneic bone blocks for vertical bone augmentation in an animal model.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Standardised allogeneic and autologous bone blocks were fixed on the frontal skull of 20 adult female pigs and covered with a resorbable collagen membrane. Animals were sacrificed after 2 and 6 months. Specimens were histologically and histomorphometrically analysed focusing on the amount of vital bone, residual bone substitute material and connective tissue. Furthermore, the amount of expression of bone matrix proteins (collagen type I and osteocalcin) and de novo vessel formation (von Willebrand factor) were quantified by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Significantly more allogeneic bone blocks failed for both evaluation time points (p < 0.05). Allogeneic blocks showed significantly less vital bone with more connective tissue formation compared to autologous bone blocks. Increased vessel formation could be detected for both evaluation time points in the contact area of autologous bone with local bone. The expression of collagen type I and osteocalcin was significantly lower in the allogeneic bone graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Allogeneic cancellous bone blocks showed a significantly higher failure rate compared to autologous bone blocks. Allogeneic bone blocks seemed to negatively affect bone formation or negatively influence the host in the long term, and increased connective tissue formation and block loss should be anticipated.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

In order to maintain patient safety and treatment success clinicians should be persuaded to make a conscious choice of the applied biomaterials with regard to their components and structure.