Six-month outcomes in postapproval HeartMate3 patients: A single-center US experience

Mechanical pump complication after HeartMate 3 implantation

BACKGROUND

With the improvement in postoperative complications and long-term survival post LVAD, continuing to improve clinical outcomes will require efforts to decrease long-term complications. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence of mechanical pump failure requiring surgery, which we define as pump failure secondary to either outflow graft compression, outflow graft obstruction, or pump thrombosis requiring surgical intervention.

METHODS

141 consecutive adult patients who underwent HeartMate3 Implantation using the "cut-then-sew" implantation technique between September 2015 and September 2021 were included in our study. The primary outcome measure was mechanical pump complication (outflow graft obstruction and or pump thrombosis) requiring surgical intervention. Secondary outcome measures included incidence of bleeding, stroke, renal failure, length of stay, and overall survival. Median follow up was 27.3 months.

RESULTS

Eleven (7.8%) of patients developed mechanical pump complications. Six patients developed outflow graft obstruction. Five patients developed acute pump thrombosis. Median time to a mechanical complication was 828 days. Of the 11 patients who underwent surgery, 10 patients (90%) survived to discharge. Overall survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82.9%, 69.1% and 55.2% respectively for the entire cohort.

CONCLUSION

The mechanical pump complication rate of 7.8% which is quite high may be related to duration of follow up, as the median time to mechanical complication was 828 days. This study highlights an important late complication that occurs post LVAD implantation.

Early Postoperative Neurologic Events Are Associated With Worse Outcome and Fatal Midterm Survival After Adult Heart Transplantation

Background Neurologic events during primary stay in heart transplant (HTx) recipients may be associated with reduced outcome and survival, which we aim to explore with the current study. Methods and Results We screened and included all patients undergoing HTx in our center between September 2010 and December 2022 (n=268) and checked for the occurrence of neurologic events within their index stay. Neurologic events were defined as ischemic stroke, hemorrhage, hypoxic ischemic injury, or acute symptomatic neurologic dysfunction without central nervous system injury. The cohort was then divided into recipients with (n=33) and without (n=235) neurologic events after HTx. Using a multivariable Cox regression model, the association of neurologic events after HTx and survival was assessed. Recipients with neurologic events displayed a longer intensive care unit stay (30 versus 16 days; P=0.009), longer mechanical ventilation (192 versus 48 hours; P<0.001), and higher need for blood transfusion, and need for hemodialysis after HTx was substantially higher (81% versus 55%; P=0.01). Resternotomy (36% versus 26%; P=0.05) and mechanical life support (extracorporeal life support) after HTx (46% versus 24%; P=0.02) were also significantly higher in patients with neurologic events. Covariable-adjusted multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed a significant independent association of neurologic events and increased 30-day (hazard ratio [HR], 2.5 [95% CI, 1.0-6.0]; P=0.049), 1-year (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.1-4.3]; P=0.019), and overall (HR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.5-4.2]; P<0.001) mortality after HTx and reduced Kaplan-Meier survival up to 5 years after HTx (P<0.001). Conclusions Neurologic events after HTx were strongly and independently associated with worse postoperative outcome and reduced survival up to 5 years after HTx.

Commentary: The value of nonrandom and uncontrolled

BACKGROUND

The HeartMate 3 (HM3) (Abbott Laboratories, Illinois) was approved by the FDA in 2018.

AIMS

In this issue of the Journal, Bansal et al perform a single center review of their experience with implantation of the HeartMate 3 before and after FDA approval.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The analysis by Bansal et al included 82 patients who were part of the RCT pre-approval group and 92 patients who underwent HM3 implantation after FDA approval.

RESULTS

The authors found that the post-approval group was younger, had a higher preoperative INR, was more likely to be undergoing HM3 implantation as part of a bridge to transplant strategy, more likely to have other mechanical support pre-operatively, and included more patients with an INTERMACS profile.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the weakness of randomized controlled trials in that they do not reflect the reality of clinical practice which underscores the need for studies such as this one for a complete understanding of any medical intervention or technology.