Awareness of venous thromboembolism in mental health services for older people

Psychiatric comorbidity and trauma: impact on inpatient outcomes and implications for future management

PURPOSE

This study aimed to quantify the impact of pre-existing psychiatric illness on inpatient outcomes after major trauma and to assess acuity of psychiatric presentation as a predictor of outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center cohort study identified adult trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16 between January 2018 and December 2019. Bivariate analysis assessed patient characteristics, injury characteristics, and injury outcomes between patients with and without psychiatric comorbidity. A sub-group analysis explored further effects of psychiatric history and need for inpatient psychiatric consultation on outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 640 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 99 patients (15.4%) had at least one psychiatric comorbidity. Patients with psychiatric comorbidity sustained distinct mechanisms of injury and higher in-hospital morbidity (44% vs. 26%, OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.17-3.3, p = 0.01), including pulmonary morbidity (31% vs. 21%, p < 0.01), neurologic morbidity (18% vs 7%, p < 0.01), and deep wound infection (8% vs. 2%, p < 0.01) than the control cohort. Psychiatric patients also had significantly greater median intensive care unit (ICU), length of stay (LOS) (1 day vs. 0 days, p = 0.04), median inpatient ward LOS (10 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.02), and median overall hospital LOS (16 days vs. 11 days, p < 0.01). In sub-group analysis, patients with a history of psychiatric illness alone had comparable outcomes to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychiatric comorbidity negatively impacts inpatient morbidity and inpatient LOS. This effect is most pronounced among acute psychiatric episodes with or without a history of mental illness.

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in mental healthcare: do the benefits outweigh the risks?

Venous thromboembolism is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. In recent years, growing awareness has led to the development of strategies to prevent venous thromboembolism in individuals admitted to hospital who are deemed to be at high risk. However, there remains a considerable degree of uncertainty over whether these strategies are of overall benefit and there are few published studies on people who are admitted to psychiatric hospitals. In this editorial I review current clinical practice and areas of uncertainty with respect to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis and its implementation in mental healthcare settings.