A different perspective on sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment of patients with HCV genotype 1b cirrhosis: The ital-c network study

Updating the Clinical Application of Blood Biomarkers and Their Algorithms in the Diagnosis and Surveillance of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Critical Review

The most common primary liver cancer is hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and its mortality rate is increasing globally. The overall 5-year survival of patients with liver cancer is currently 10-20%. Moreover, because early diagnosis can significantly improve prognosis, which is highly correlated with tumor stage, early detection of HCC is critical. International guidelines advise using α-FP biomarker with/without ultrasonography for HCC surveillance in patients with advanced liver disease. However, traditional biomarkers are sub-optimal for risk stratification of HCC development in high-risk populations, early diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment response prediction. Since about 20% of HCCs do not produce α-FP due to its biological diversity, combining α-FP with novel biomarkers can enhance HCC detection sensitivity. There is a chance to offer promising cancer management methods in high-risk populations by utilizing HCC screening strategies derived from new tumor biomarkers and prognostic scores created by combining biomarkers with distinct clinical parameters. Despite numerous efforts to identify molecules as potential biomarkers, there is no single ideal marker in HCC. When combined with other clinical parameters, the detection of some biomarkers has higher sensitivity and specificity in comparison with a single biomarker. Therefore, newer biomarkers and models, such as the Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of Alpha-fetoprotein (α-FP), α-FP-L3, Des-γ-carboxy-prothrombin (DCP or PIVKA-II), and the GALAD score, are being used more frequently in the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC. Notably, the GALAD algorithm was effective in HCC prevention, particularly for cirrhotic patients, regardless of the cause of their liver disease. Although the role of these biomarkers in surveillance is still being researched, they may provide a more practical alternative to traditional imaging-based surveillance. Finally, looking for new diagnostic/surveillance tools may help improve patients' survival. This review discusses the current roles of the most used biomarkers and prognostic scores that may aid in the clinical management of HCC patients.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus in elderly patients (≥65 years old): A systematic review and meta-analysis

Direct-acting agents (DAAs) have launched a new era of hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment. As aged individuals comprise a large percentage of HCV-infected patients, the effectiveness and safety of DAAs in the elderly have come under scrutiny. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DAAs in elderly patients. After a systematic search in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, OVID MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and other databases, two investigators reviewed relevant abstracts and selected manuscripts for examination. The sustained virologic response (SVR) and adverse event (AE) rates were calculated with a random-effects model. Ninety studies evaluating SVR rates of elderly patients (≥65 years old) receiving DAAs were selected. DAAs in elderly patients exhibited a notable SVR rate of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 95%-97%), accompanied by comparable rates in subgroup analyses. The comparison of SVR rates in elderly and non-elderly patients indicated no significant discrepancy (odds ratio [OR] 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.01). The overall event rate of AEs was 45% (95% CI: 31%-60%), though AE rates varied by subgroups. Furthermore, AEs were comparatively more frequent (OR 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.28) in the elderly than non-elderly, especially in subgroups such as SAE (OR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.52-2.36) and dose reduction in ribavirin (OR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.53-2.36). However, in the ribavirin (RBV)-free regimen, there was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs between the elderly and non-elderly groups. DAAs have high efficacy in elderly patients. Considering the possibility of AE, the RBV-free regimen should be given prior consideration for the treatment of elderly patients with HCV.

Minimal portosystemic encephalopathy: A new nosological entity in patients with hereditary haemorrhagic telangiectasia

BACKGROUND

Portosystemic shunts in Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia (HHT) are often overlooked by conventional imaging although they could reduce hepatic clearance of gut-derived toxins.

AIMS

To evaluate, the presence of subclinical neurological alterations (SNAs), that we named "minimal portosystemic encephalopathy" (mPSE) in HHT patients without advanced liver disease (ALD).

METHODS

In this cross sectional study, consecutive HHT outpatients were firstly screened by critical flicker frequency (CFF) test (abnormal ≤39Hz), and the simplified animal naming test (S-ANT₁) (abnormal <15) was used to confirm the diagnosis of mPSE. Furthermore, we evaluated the effect of lactulose administration on mPSE. Multi-slice CT, cerebral dynamic magnetic resonance, laboratory analyses and transient elastography were also used.

RESULTS

None of the 37 enrolled patients showed portosystemic shunts at imaging techniques. However, 33 patients had normal CFF values (CFF-) and 4 displayed CFF alterations (37.0±0.7Hz, CFF+). The S-ANT₁ confirmed an impaired neurological performance (10.2±2.8) in CFF+ patients thus confirming the presence of mPSE. Noteworthy, lactulose administration determined a CFF increase (39.1±0.4Hz) and S-ANT₁ normalization in these patients. Neither mPSE- nor mPSE+ patients had ALD and showed similar demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters. Finally, no mPSE+ patient showed radiologically-detectable brain vascular malformations or other brain abnormalities at imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

HHT patients represent a human model of mPSE secondary to portosystemic shunts escaping radiological detection. mPSE evaluation should be incorporated in HHT surveillance protocols since it can affect both health-related/social aspects and pharmacokinetics of orally administered drugs with a narrow therapeutic index and high hepatic first-pass uptake.

Treatment optimisation for hepatitis C in the era of combination direct-acting antiviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Prior to direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy, personalised medicine played an important role in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV). Whilst simplified treatment strategies are central to treatment scale-up, some patients will benefit from treatment optimisation. This systematic review and meta-analysis explores treatment optimisation strategies in the DAA era. Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, and Web of Science for studies that adopted a stratified or personalised strategy using a licensed combination DAA regimen, alone or with additional agents. We performed a thematic analysis to classify optimisation strategies and a meta-analysis of sustained virologic response rates (SVR), exploring heterogeneity with subgroup analyses and meta-regression. Results: We included 64 studies (9450 participants). Thematic analysis found evidence of three approaches: duration, combination, and/or dose optimisation. We separated strategies into those aiming to maintain SVR in the absence of predictors of failure, and those aiming to improve SVR in the presence of predictors of failure. Shortened duration regimens achieve pooled SVR rates of 94.2% (92.3-95.9%) for 8 weeks, 81.1% (75.1-86.6%) for 6 weeks, and 63.1% (39.9-83.7%) for ≤4 weeks. Personalised strategies (100% vs 87.6%; p<0.001) and therapy shortened according to ≥3 host/viral factors (92.9% vs 81.4% or 87.2% for 1 or 2 host/viral factors, respectively; p=0.008) offer higher SVR rates when shortening therapy. Hard-to-treat HCV genotype 3 patients suffer lower SVR rates despite treatment optimisation (92.6% vs 98.2%; p=0.001). Conclusions: Treatment optimisation for individuals with multiple predictors of treatment failure can offer high SVR rates. More evidence is needed to identify with confidence those individuals in whom SVR can be achieved with shortened duration treatment.

Sustained virologic response to direct-acting antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C and hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The effect of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on the response to interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection remains unclear. Using a systematic review and meta-analysis approach, we aimed to investigate the effect of DAA therapy on sustained virologic response (SVR) among patients with CHC and either active, inactive or no HCC.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from 1/1/2013 to 9/24/2018. The pooled SVR rates were computed using DerSimonian-Laird random-effects models.

RESULTS

We included 49 studies from 15 countries, comprised of 3,341 patients with HCC and 35,701 without HCC. Overall, the pooled SVR was lower in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (89.6%, 95% CI 86.8-92.1%, I² = 79.1% vs. 93.3%, 95% CI 91.9-94.7%, I² = 95.0%, p = 0.0012), translating to a 4.8% (95% CI 0.2-7.4%) SVR reduction by meta-regression analysis. The largest SVR reduction (18.8%) occurred in patients with active/residual HCC vs. inactive/ablated HCC (SVR 73.1% vs. 92.6%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, patients with HCC who received a prior liver transplant had higher SVR rates than those who did not (p <0.001). Regarding specific DAA regimens, patients with HCC treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir had lower SVR rates than patients without HCC (92.6%, n = 884 vs. 97.8%, n = 13,141, p = 0.026), but heterogeneity was high (I² = 84.7%, p <0.001). The SVR rate was similar in patients with/without HCC who were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir ± dasabuvir (n = 101) (97.2% vs. 94.8%, p = 0.79), or daclatasvir/asunaprevir (91.7% vs. 89.8%, p = 0.66).

CONCLUSION

Overall, SVR rates were lower in patients with HCC, especially with active HCC, compared to those without HCC, though heterogeneity was high. Continued efforts are needed to aggressively screen, diagnose, and treat HCC to ensure higher CHC cure rates.

LAY SUMMARY

There are now medications (direct-acting antivirals or "DAAs") that can "cure" hepatitis C virus, but patients with hepatitis C and liver cancer may be less likely to achieve cure than those without liver cancer. However, patients with liver cancer are also more likely to have advanced liver disease and risk factors that can decrease cure rates, so better controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt does not affect the efficacy and safety of direct-acting antivirals in patients with advanced cirrhosis: A real-life, case-control study

BACKGROUND

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) is a well-established treatment for complications of portal hypertension.

AIMS

To analyze the impact of TIPS on virologic response and safety profile in patients treated with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).

METHODS

We analyzed data from HCV-positive cirrhotic patients treated with DAAs. Twenty-one patients with previous TIPS placement were compared with 42 matched subjects without TIPS. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of hepatic function worsening and adverse events.

RESULTS

No differences were found between the two groups in particular regarding sustained virologic response (92.5 and 97.6% in TIPS vs no-TIPS, p = 0.559). Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) of both TIPS and no-TIPS groups declined from baseline to week 24 of follow-up (from 12.5 ± 3.5 to 10.8 ± 3.4 and from 11.1 ± 3.5 to 10.3 ± 3.4, p = 0.044 and 0.025). There were no differences in adverse event rates. At univariate analysis, age was associated with MELD increase from baseline to week 24 (OR 1.111, 95% CI 1.019-1.211, p = 0.017), and patients with higher baseline MELD developed serious adverse events more frequently (OR 0.815, 95% CI 0.658-1.010, p = 0.062). Patients with or without TIPS did not show differences in transplant-free survival.

CONCLUSION

TIPS placement does not affect virologic response and clinical outcome of patients receiving DAAs.

Recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with treated hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis C virus-associated cirrhosis after ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir+dasabuvir+ribavirin therapy

Introduction

Recent studies have suggested a higher recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with a history of HCC and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-associated cirrhosis treated with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents.

Material and methods

We conducted a prospective analysis of 24 patients with HCV-associated cirrhosis and treated HCC who received ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir+dasabuvir+ribavirin for 12 weeks. Prior therapies for HCC included resection (9/24 patients), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) (7/24) and trans-arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (8/24). All patients were eligible for treatment if they had no HCC recurrence 6 months after their last procedure. A control group was defined. All patients were followed every 6 months, with dynamic computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging.

Results

The sustained virological response rate per protocol was 21/24 (87.5%). The study group included 14 (59%) males, median age 64 years (51-77), 50% with associated non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and 24% with Child-Pugh A6 points. HCC recurrence rate/100 patient-years was lower in the DAA-HCC group versus control: 5.5 versus 24.6% patient-years for the resection+RFA group (p = 0.044), respectively, and 18.6 versus 72.7% patient-years for TACE group (p = 0.002). Survival without recurrence was higher in the resection+RFA group (45 compared to 18 months (p < 0.001)) and also in the TACE group (44 compared to 11.5 months (p = 0.002)).

Conclusions

DAA therapy significantly reduced the recurrence rate of HCC and improved survival without recurrence in patients with treated HCV-associated HCC.

Clinical relevance of serum non-organ-specific antibodies in patients with HCV infection receiving direct-acting antiviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with production of different serum non-organ-specific antibodies (NOSA) and risk for developing autoimmune disorders. The clinical significance of these phenomena is not fully understood.

AIM

To assess non-organ-specific antibodies before and 24 weeks after the end of therapy with direct-acting antivirals in patients with HCV-related infection, to better clarify the clinical relevance of these antibodies in terms of treatment response and prognostic value.

METHODS

Patients enrolled (191) were considered non-organ-specific antibody-positive for titres ≥1:40 on at least two determinations before treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline, 46 patients were positive and 145 were negative for autoantibodies. The prevalence of autoimmune thyroiditis was significantly higher in non-organ-specific antibody-positive group than non-organ-specific antibody-negative group (P = 0.02). HCV-RNA 24 weeks after the end of antiviral therapy was 100% negative in patients with antibodies positivity and 98.6% in antibody-negative patients (P = 1.0). In the former group, autoantibodies disappeared in 30 of 46 patients (65.2%). On multivariate analysis, non-organ-specific antibody-negativity was significantly reduced in patients with hepatic hilar lymphadenopathy (OR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.02-0.94, P = 0.04). None of the adverse events occurring during antiviral therapy was related to autoimmune disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis C virus clearance frequently reduces non-organ-specific antibody positivity suggesting that they represent an epiphenomenon of the viral infection. However, in patients who did not become negative, long-term monitoring would establish whether they could hide an underlying process that may progress into a clear autoimmune or rheumatologic disease. (Trial registration number: NCT03566966).