1
|
Padoan A, Cosma C, Di Chiara C, Furlan G, Gastaldo S, Talli I, Donà D, Basso D, Giaquinto C, Plebani M. Clinical and Analytical Performance of ELISA Salivary Serologic Assay to Detect SARS-CoV-2 IgG in Children and Adults. Antibodies (Basel) 2024; 13:6. [PMID: 38247570 PMCID: PMC10801479 DOI: 10.3390/antib13010006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Revised: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Saliva is a promising matrix with several purposes. Our aim is to verify if salivary anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody determination is suitable for monitoring immune responses. One hundred eighty-seven subjects were enrolled at University-Hospital Padova: 105 females (56.1%) and 82 males (43.9%), 95 (50.8%) children and 92 (49.2%) adults. Subjects self-collected saliva using Salivette; nineteen subjects collected three different samples within the day. A serum sample was obtained for all individuals. The N/S anti-SARS-CoV-2 salivary IgG (sal-IgG) and serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD IgG (ser-IgG) were used for determining anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The mean (min-max) age was 9.0 (1-18) for children and 42.5 (20-61) for adults. Of 187 samples, 63 were negative for sal-IgG (33.7%), while 7 were negative for ser-IgG (3.7%). Spearman's correlation was 0.56 (p < 0.001). Sal-IgG and ser-IgG levels were correlated with age but not with gender, comorbidities, prolonged therapy, previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, or time from last COVID-19 infection/vaccination. The repeatability ranged from 23.8% (7.4 kAU/L) to 4.0% (3.77 kAU/L). The linearity of the assay was missed in 4/6 samples. No significant intrasubject differences were observed in sal-IgG across samples collected at different time points. Sal-IgG has good agreement with ser-IgG. Noninvasive saliva collection represents an alternative method for antibody measurement, especially in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Padoan
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (A.P.); (C.C.); (D.B.); (M.P.)
- UOC of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, 35011 Padova, Italy;
| | - Chiara Cosma
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (A.P.); (C.C.); (D.B.); (M.P.)
- UOC of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, 35011 Padova, Italy;
| | - Costanza Di Chiara
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy (S.G.); (D.D.); (C.G.)
- Penta–Child Health Research, 35127 Padua, Italy
| | - Giulia Furlan
- QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, 35011 Padova, Italy;
| | - Stefano Gastaldo
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy (S.G.); (D.D.); (C.G.)
| | - Ilaria Talli
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (A.P.); (C.C.); (D.B.); (M.P.)
- UOC of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Daniele Donà
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy (S.G.); (D.D.); (C.G.)
- Penta–Child Health Research, 35127 Padua, Italy
| | - Daniela Basso
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (A.P.); (C.C.); (D.B.); (M.P.)
- UOC of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, 35011 Padova, Italy;
| | - Carlo Giaquinto
- Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy (S.G.); (D.D.); (C.G.)
- Penta–Child Health Research, 35127 Padua, Italy
| | - Mario Plebani
- Department of Medicine (DIMED), University of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy; (A.P.); (C.C.); (D.B.); (M.P.)
- UOC of Laboratory Medicine, University-Hospital of Padova, 35128 Padova, Italy
- QI.LAB.MED, Spin-off of the University of Padova, 35011 Padova, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ling-Hu T, Rios-Guzman E, Lorenzo-Redondo R, Ozer EA, Hultquist JF. Challenges and Opportunities for Global Genomic Surveillance Strategies in the COVID-19 Era. Viruses 2022; 14:2532. [PMID: 36423141 PMCID: PMC9698389 DOI: 10.3390/v14112532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/11/2022] [Accepted: 11/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance efforts have provided critical data on the ongoing evolution of the virus to inform best practices in clinical care and public health throughout the pandemic. Impactful genomic surveillance strategies generally follow a multi-disciplinary pipeline involving clinical sample collection, viral genotyping, metadata linkage, data reporting, and public health responses. Unfortunately, current limitations in each of these steps have compromised the overall effectiveness of these strategies. Biases from convenience-based sampling methods can obfuscate the true distribution of circulating variants. The lack of standardization in genotyping strategies and bioinformatic expertise can create bottlenecks in data processing and complicate interpretation. Limitations and inconsistencies in clinical and demographic data collection and sharing can slow the compilation and limit the utility of comprehensive datasets. This likewise can complicate data reporting, restricting the availability of timely data. Finally, gaps and delays in the implementation of genomic surveillance data in the public health sphere can prevent officials from formulating effective mitigation strategies to prevent outbreaks. In this review, we outline current SARS-CoV-2 global genomic surveillance methods and assess roadblocks at each step of the pipeline to identify potential solutions. Evaluating the current obstacles that impede effective surveillance can improve both global coordination efforts and pandemic preparedness for future outbreaks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ted Ling-Hu
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Center for Pathogen Genomics and Microbial Evolution, Robert J. Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Estefany Rios-Guzman
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Center for Pathogen Genomics and Microbial Evolution, Robert J. Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Ramon Lorenzo-Redondo
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Center for Pathogen Genomics and Microbial Evolution, Robert J. Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Egon A. Ozer
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Center for Pathogen Genomics and Microbial Evolution, Robert J. Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| | - Judd F. Hultquist
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
- Center for Pathogen Genomics and Microbial Evolution, Robert J. Havey, MD Institute for Global Health, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|